This application is the National Stage of PCT/IB2009/006927 filed on Aug. 6, 2009, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 of German Application No. 10 2008 038 670.7 filed on Aug. 12, 2008 and German Application No. 10 2008 047 586.6 filed on Sep. 17, 2008, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference. The international application under PCT article 21(2) was not published in English.
The invention relates to a transport container made of plastic, having side walls that rise from a bottom part, which walls are reinforced, on their surface that faces outward, by means of vertical and/or horizontal ribs that project away from the walls. This can be a small-load or also a large-load carrier, in which the side walls can also be configured in collapsible manner.
Such load carriers are placed on top of one another in the loaded state, so that rather great forces act on the side walls.
The weight and the ability to withstand mechanical stress play an ever greater role, particularly in the case of small-load carriers made of plastic.
The demand for ever greater stacking loads can be met in that more rigid and therefore more brittle materials are used, additional ribs are introduced, predominantly in the corner regions, or steel reinforcements are screwed on or riveted on.
If one manufactures the load carrier from a rigid material, it is true that the stacking load can be increased, but on the other hand, the products break significantly more quickly, as the result of the brittleness of the material.
It is true that additional ribs can increase the stacking load by 20% to 30%, but they are significantly more difficult to clean and increase the weight.
Steel reinforcements are extremely expensive and the combination of plastic and steel is difficult to recycle.
For this reason, the invention is based on the task of configuring a transport container of the type stated initially, in such a manner that while the elasticity of the transport container remains the same, the stacking load can increase by at least 100%, without recycling being connected with additional effort, and without an increase in the weight of the transport container.
The invention accomplishes this task in that panels made of plastic filled with additives that increase stability are applied to the outside of at least two side walls that lie opposite one another.
Stable, rigid panels are applied to a plastic container made of an elastic plastic material, produced in normal manner.
The combination of the two materials fulfills the partial stated task of being able to increase the stacking load without worsening the elasticity of the transport container.
Another advantage of the transport container configured according to the invention that can be named is the cleaning-friendliness that results from the smooth outer surface.
Furthermore, transport container and panel can be recycled together.
However, a main advantage can be seen in that the base container can be produced from an elastic material, whereby furthermore material can be saved, since the actual stability and strength of the container are produced by means of the panels that are applied.
Glass fibers, hemp fibers, steel fibers, talcum, chalk, and similar materials that increase stability can be provided as additives. In addition, however, the panels can also consist of materials that are more rigid in themselves, such as, for example, polyamide, POM, etc.
According to one embodiment, it is provided that the plastic panels filled with the additives are welded onto reinforcement ribs on the surface of the side walls.
Alternatively, it is provided that the plastic panels filled with the additives are screwed onto or riveted onto the reinforcement ribs.
In an advantageous embodiment, it is provided that the plastic panels filled with the additives stand on a rib that runs around the circumference at the level of the bottom of the container, with their lower edge, and that the upper edge of the plastic panel, in each instance, butts up against a rib that surrounds the upper edge of the container and projects outward.
The plastic panel filled with the additives is therefore supported at the bottom and at the top, and therefore can well absorb forces that are introduced vertically into the side walls from above.
Depending on the embodiment and the purpose of use, the plastic panels filled with the additives can be disposed merely in the corner regions of the side wall. This means that the reinforced panels are configured in strip shape and are used in the region in which two side walls abut one another.
Alternatively, it is provided according to claim 6 that the plastic panels filled with the additives are disposed centered on the side walls.
Thus, the panels cover practically the entire surface of a side wall of the base transport container.
In an extreme case, it can, of course, also be provided that such panels made of reinforced plastic are disposed not only centered on the side walls but also in the corner regions.
In order to further increase the stability of such a design, a layer of pressed paperboard is enclosed between the side surface and the plastic panel filled with the additives.
However, a reinforcement composed of metal parts, which are introduced into the interstice, can also be provided.
Alternatively, it can be provided according to one aspect of the invention that a layer of wood is enclosed between side wall surface and the plastic panel filled with the additives, whereby it is provided according to a further aspect that the grain of the wood runs in the direction from the bottom to the edge of the container.
Thus, the forces introduced into the side walls vertically can be absorbed even more effectively.
The additives, for example the glass fibers in the plastic panels, can also have such an orientation, so that a further increase in stacking load is made possible in this way.
In the following, the invention will be shown and explained using drawings.
These show:
In
It consists of a bottom part 2 and side walls 3, 4, 5, and 6 that rise vertically from this bottom part 2.
In the bottom region, a rib 7 that projects horizontally outward is provided on the circumference. Correspondingly, a rib 8 that projects horizontally outward is provided on the circumference of the upper edge of the container 1.
In the region between these ribs 7 and 8, reinforcement ribs 9 and 10 that run horizontally around the circumference and disposed vertically are provided on the top of the side walls 3 to 6, but these ribs do not project as far outward as the ribs 7 and 8.
For reinforcement of the transport container 1 shown in
This fiberglass-reinforced panel 11 is supported on the lower rib 7, on the one hand, and abuts against the underside of the rib 8 with its upper edge, on the other hand.
In this connection, the fiberglass-reinforced panel 11 covers almost the entire side wall 3, 4. It is welded onto the horizontal or vertical ribs 9 and 10, for example. However, it can also be screwed on or riveted on.
In
Finally, in
In
This filler material can be pressed paperboard, for example, or also wood, whereby it is advantageous if the wood runs from the bottom to the upper edge of the container 1 in its grain direction. This filler further increases the stacking load capacity of the container, but does not disturb the recycling process, since the paperboard or the wood can be separated by the plastic by means of wind screening.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 038 670 | Aug 2008 | DE | national |
10 2008 047 586 | Sep 2008 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2009/006927 | 8/6/2009 | WO | 00 | 2/1/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/018462 | 2/18/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
574987 | Farrell | Jan 1897 | A |
3501047 | Raabe | Mar 1970 | A |
3620399 | Rapeaud | Nov 1971 | A |
3622037 | Gildart | Nov 1971 | A |
3895258 | Gruetman | Jul 1975 | A |
4082882 | Weinstein et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4107362 | Valyi | Aug 1978 | A |
4597503 | Lates | Jul 1986 | A |
5351846 | Carter | Oct 1994 | A |
5449081 | Sjostedt et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5531352 | Kraft et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5586675 | Borsboom et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5622306 | Grigsby, Sr. | Apr 1997 | A |
5720403 | Sawyer | Feb 1998 | A |
D415866 | Huang | Oct 1999 | S |
5960975 | Lennartsson | Oct 1999 | A |
5979684 | Ohnishi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6077579 | De Laforcade | Jun 2000 | A |
6135287 | Hartwall | Oct 2000 | A |
6955273 | Hartwall | Oct 2005 | B2 |
20040112907 | Donnelly et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050150892 | Miller | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070245651 | Hardigg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080023538 | Robertson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080203089 | Hartwall | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090114645 | Zemer | May 2009 | A1 |
20100012550 | Dedmon et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
683091 | Jan 1994 | CH |
92 06 973 | Sep 1992 | DE |
2 591 453 | Jun 1987 | FR |
2 612 493 | Sep 1988 | FR |
2 697 800 | May 1994 | FR |
2040880 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2103184 | Feb 1983 | GB |
2 255 968 | Nov 1992 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110127275 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |