This is a National Phase Application filed under 35 U.S.C. 371 as a national stage of PCT/EP2017/071953, filed Sep. 1, 2017, an application claiming the benefit of European Application No. 16186986.2, filed Sep. 2, 2016, the content of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a transportation and storage system for a wind turbine blade. In another aspect, the present invention relates to the use of the system for transporting and/or storing one or more wind turbine blades.
Wind power is becoming increasingly popular due to its clean and environmentally friendly production of energy. The rotor blades of modern wind turbines capture kinetic wind energy by using sophisticated blade design created to maximize efficiency. Turbine blades may today exceed 80 metres in length and 4 metres in width. The blades are typically made from a fibre-reinforced polymer material and comprise a pressure side shell half and a suction side shell half. The cross-sectional profile of a typical blade includes an airfoil for creating an air flow leading to a pressure difference between both sides. The resulting lift force generates torque for producing electricity.
Transporting wind turbine blades from a production site to a wind power plant requires many transportation steps. Typically, the blades are transported by truck, train or ship and again by truck to the site of the wind power plant. Additionally, reloading between the different types of transportation is needed. Finally, the blades are stored at the production facility and at the site of the wind turbine power plant. Due to the size and fragility of large rotor blades, the blades may be damaged during transport as well as during loading and unloading. Such damage may seriously degrade the performance of the blades. Therefore, the blades need to be carefully packaged in order to ensure that they are not damaged.
In view of the increasing dimensions of modern wind turbine blades, it is becoming more challenging and costly to transport the blades. Transportation costs may amount to as much as 20 percent of the total costs for manufacturing, transporting and mounting the wind turbine blade on the rotor of a wind turbine blade. In addition, some blades are transported to the wind power plant using different modes of transport, such as by truck, train and ship. Some of these modes of transports may have restrictions on large loads, maximum heights, maximum widths, maximum distances between transport frames or supports, for instance dictated by local regulations. Therefore, there exists a logistic problem of providing transport solutions that are suitable for various types of transport.
Overall, there is a demand for making transport solutions simpler, safer and cheaper. In particular, there is a demand for making such systems more flexible such that adaption to a certain transportation situation is possible. This applies for example to shifting from land transport to sea transport. While height restrictions require lowest possible inter-blade spacings, sea transport may require an increased inter-blade spacing to avoid contact between blades during sea disturbance.
WO 2014/064247 describes a transportation and storage system for at least two wind turbine blades. The system is adapted to stack the blades in an alternating root end to tip end arrangement. The tip end of the second wind turbine blade may extend beyond the root end of the first wind turbine blade, and the tip end of the first wind turbine blade may extend beyond the root end of the second wind turbine blade, when the first and the second wind turbine blades are arranged in the packaging system.
EP1387802 discloses a method and system for transporting two straight wind turbine blades, where the root end of a first blade is arranged in a first package frame, and the tip end of a second, neighbouring blade is arranged in a second package frame that is arranged next to and connected to the first package frame with the effect that the blades are stored compactly alongside each other in a “tip-to-root” arrangement. However, in this transport system the tip end frames support the blades at the very tip of the blades, where they are mechanically most fragile. Further, the package frames are arranged at the root end face and the blade tip. Therefore, the distance between the package frames are approximately equal to the length of the blades. For very long blades of 45 metres or longer, this might not be possible due to local regulations and restrictions on transport.
Using some of these prior art approaches for transporting and/or storing increasingly larger wind turbine blades involves the challenge of providing a structure having low weight and high flexibility while maintaining a high standard of structural stability and safety.
It is therefore a first object of the present invention to provide a transportation and storage system for wind turbine blades which overcomes or ameliorates at least one of the disadvantages of the prior art or which provides a useful alternative.
Particularly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a transportation and storage system that is sufficiently light, yet mechanically stable.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a transport and storage solution that is simple and cost-efficient.
In a first aspect, the present invention relates to a transportation and storage system for a wind turbine blade, the blade having a profiled contour including a pressure side and a suction side, and a leading edge and a trailing edge with a chord having a chord length extending therebetween, the wind turbine blade extending in a spanwise direction between a root end and a tip end, wherein the system comprises a root frame assembly comprising at least one root end receptacle and a root end frame, wherein the root end receptacle is mounted to the root end frame, the system further comprising a tip frame assembly comprising at least one tip end receptacle and a tip end frame, wherein the tip end receptacle is mounted to the tip end frame, wherein the root end frame and/or the tip end frame each comprises a first lateral frame part and a second lateral frame part being laterally spaced apart and being mutually rigidly connected by means of at least one transversely extending transverse frame part, wherein each lateral frame part comprises
The first and the second upper inclined beams may extend in the same plane. The first and the second lower inclined beams may extend in the same plane. The first and second upper inclined beams and the first and second lower inclined beams may extend in the same plane.
The first lateral frame part may extend in a first lateral plane. The second lateral frame part may extend in a second lateral plane. The first lateral plane and the second lateral plane may be parallel. The first lateral plane and/or the second lateral plane may be perpendicular to the at least one transversely extending transverse frame part.
The present inventors have found that this setup allows a better and lighter design in comparison to some of the prior art arrangements, while maintaining the necessary mechanical stability. In a preferred embodiment, the first upper inclined beam and the second upper inclined beam form an acute angle and/or the first lower inclined beam and the second lower inclined beam form an acute angle. Preferably, the first and second upper inclined beams extend from the two respective opposing ends of the top member, whereas the first and second lower inclined beams extend from the two respective opposing ends of the bottom member.
In another embodiment, the angle formed between the first upper inclined beam and the second upper inclined beam is the same as the angle formed between the first lower inclined beam and the second lower inclined beam. According to another embodiment, the first upper inclined beam has the same length as the second upper inclined beam and/or the first lower inclined beam has the same length as the second lower inclined beam. Preferably, all inclined beams have the same length.
In a preferred embodiment, the center beam, the first and second upper inclined beams and the first and second lower inclined beams are arranged symmetrically. In such arrangement, the first and second upper inclined beams advantageously form a V-shape, and the first and second lower inclined beams form an inverted V-shape.
In another embodiment, the respective first and second upper inclined beams and the respective first and second lower inclined beams are fastened to the center beam within a region of the center beam which is spaced from the upper and lower end thereof by at least 30% of the total vertical length of the center beam. It is thus preferred that the point of contact between the center beam and the respective inclined beams is close to the midpoint of the center beam as seen in its vertical extension. Preferably, all inclined beams contact the center beam within a region corresponding to not more than 30% of its vertical extension, i.e. a region that is spaced plus/minus 15% of its midpoint.
Preferably, each tip end frame is stackable on top of a root end frame and vice versa, such that the system is operable to stack successive wind turbine blades in an alternating root end to tip end arrangement. In a preferred embodiment, the tip end frame and the root end frame each comprise lower stacking means in a base part thereof and upper stacking means at a top thereof, said lower stacking means being arranged so as to be connected with the upper stacking means by means of locking means to allow stacking of a first tip end frame on top of a second tip end frame, said lower stacking means defining at least a portion of the bottom surface of the tip end frame. Thus, tip end frames and root end frames can be stacked in a tip end to root end configuration. However, with an intermediate frame they can also be stacked in a root end to root end configuration.
In one embodiment, the top member comprises a substantially horizontal upper surface, said upper surface comprising one or more protrusions, and wherein the bottom member comprises a substantially horizontal lower surface, said lower surface comprising one or more cavities for receiving the one more protrusion on the upper surface of the top member of another root end frame or tip end frame in a stacked arrangement.
According to another embodiment, two trapezoid shaped blocks are secured to opposite sides of the center beam for receiving end portions of the first and second upper and lower inclined beams. This was found to result in a particularly stable design.
According to another embodiment, the center beam has a rectangular cross section. In a preferred embodiment, the inclined beams have a rectangular cross section. Preferably, the center beam and/or the inclined beams are hollow. Thus, the frame assemblies of the present invention have an advantageous light design.
In one embodiment, the root end receptacle is hingedly mounted to the root end frame, preferably along a horizontal axis. The root end receptacles may be hingedly supported to prevent large bending moments from entering into the frames.
The root end receptacle may be mounted to the center beam of the first lateral frame part and/or the center beam of the second lateral frame part.
In a preferred embodiment, the root end receptacle is releasably mounted to the root end frame. The root end receptacles may advantageously be dismounted from the root end frame and installed on the blade before loading into the main frame. According to another embodiment, the system comprises two root end receptacles mounted to the root end frame.
Advantageously, each root end receptacle comprises a plurality of through holes for bolting the root end of a wind turbine blade to the root end receptacle. In a preferred embodiment, the through holes are arranged in at least one arc and/or at least one line.
Preferably, the through holes are arranged for bolting root ends of at least two different diameters to the root end receptacle. It is particularly preferred that the through holes are arranged to receive three different blade types with different bolt patterns.
According to another embodiment, the root end receptacle comprises a block of material, said block comprising an arched supporting surface for receiving the root end of a wind turbine blade. The arched supporting surface advantageously corresponds to part of the outer surface of the root end of a wind turbine blade and is preferably made of a material preventing scratching of the surface of the blade. In one embodiment, the supporting surface of the root end receptacle is shaped so as to at least partly conform to a surface contour of root end of the blade.
In a preferred embodiment, the tip end receptacle is a tip end clamp. The tip end clamp may comprise a supporting surface for receiving the wind turbine blade close to its tip end. The supporting surface may be made of a flexible material being able to at least partially adapt to the surface of the blade. The supporting surface is preferably made of a material preventing scratching of the surface of the blade. The non-scratching supporting surface can be formed of a wood material, a rubber material, a textile material or a polymer material, e.g. a foamed polymer, such as foamed polyurethane.
The supporting surface of the tip end clamp may furthermore comprise a padding that is graded in hardness so that the largest forces are diverted to the main laminate on which the blade is supported.
According to another embodiment, the tip end receptacle is slidable in at least one direction, preferably a horizontal direction. Preferably, the tip end receptacle is slidable in the z-direction, such as plus/minus 50 mm, to allow the blade to move freely when swinging. The tip end receptacle may also hinge around the x-direction. The tip end receptacles may be removed without the requirement to remove the entire frame.
In one embodiment, the tip end receptacle is hingedly mounted to the tip end frame. According to another embodiment, the tip end receptacle is releasably mounted to the tip end frame.
The tip end receptacle may be mounted to the center beam of the first lateral frame part and/or the center beam of the second lateral frame part.
In one embodiment, the transverse frame part comprises one or more horizontally arranged bars interconnecting the first and second lateral frame parts. In a preferred embodiment, the horizontally arranged bar has a circular cross section for receiving at least one clamp ring of a root end receptacle. In addition, the transverse frame part may further comprise a first and a second reinforcing bar, preferably in an inclined orientation, and a transverse, substantially horizontally arranged, base member interconnecting the first and second lateral frame parts.
According to another embodiment, the root frame assembly and/or the tip frame assembly comprises at least one ladder, preferably two ladders. This is advantageous for allowing operational staff to install and dismount receptacles and/or blades.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to the use of a system according to the present invention for transporting and/or storing one or more wind turbine blades.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a transportation and storage system for a wind turbine blade, the blade having a profiled contour including a pressure side and a suction side, and a leading edge and a trailing edge with a chord having a chord length extending therebetween, the wind turbine blade extending in a spanwise direction between a root end and a tip end, wherein the system comprises a root frame assembly comprising at least one root end receptacle and a root end frame, wherein the root end receptacle is mounted to the root end frame, wherein the root end receptacle comprises a block of material, said block comprising an arched supporting surface for receiving the root end of a wind turbine blade, wherein the root end frame assembly, such as the root end frame, comprises an upwardly open space, such as a plurality of upwardly open spaces, for receiving a plurality of stay bolts fixed to the root end of a wind turbine blade. The block may comprise the plurality of upwardly open spaces.
The advantage of this root frame assembly is that it can easily be used for offshore blades since the blades can be removed directly vertically upwards and out of the assembly whilst on installation vessels. This is in particular facilitated by the block with the arched supporting surface, preferably having the shape of a half moon. The block with the half moon surface is preferably hingedly connected to the root end frame. The arched supporting surface advantageously corresponds to part of the outer surface of the root end of a wind turbine blade and is preferably made of a material preventing scratching of the surface of the blade.
The invention is explained in detail below with reference to embodiments shown in the drawings, in which
The airfoil region 34 (also called the profiled region) has an ideal or almost ideal blade shape with respect to generating lift, whereas the root region 30 due to structural considerations has a substantially circular or elliptical cross-section, which for instance makes it easier and safer to mount the blade 10 to the hub. The diameter (or the chord) of the root region 30 may be constant along the entire root area 30. The transition region 32 has a transitional profile gradually changing from the circular or elliptical shape of the root region 30 to the airfoil profile of the airfoil region 34. The chord length of the transition region 32 typically increases with increasing distance r from the hub. The airfoil region 34 has an airfoil profile with a chord extending between the leading edge 18 and the trailing edge 20 of the blade 10. The width of the chord decreases with increasing distance r from the hub.
A shoulder 40 of the blade 10 is defined as the position, where the blade 10 has its largest chord length. The shoulder 40 is typically provided at the boundary between the transition region 32 and the airfoil region 34.
It should be noted that the chords of different sections of the blade normally do not lie in a common plane, since the blade may be twisted and/or curved (i.e. pre-bent), thus providing the chord plane with a correspondingly twisted and/or curved course, this being most often the case in order to compensate for the local velocity of the blade being dependent on the radius from the hub.
Airfoil profiles are often characterised by the following parameters: the chord length c, the maximum camber f, the position df of the maximum camber f, the maximum airfoil thickness t, which is the largest diameter of the inscribed circles along the median camber line 62, the position dt of the maximum thickness t, and a nose radius (not shown). These parameters are typically defined as ratios to the chord length c. Thus, a local relative blade thickness t/c is given as the ratio between the local maximum thickness t and the local chord length c. Further, the position dp of the maximum pressure side camber may be used as a design parameter, and of course also the position of the maximum suction side camber.
The lateral frame parts 72, 74 also comprise a center beam 88 arranged substantially vertically and connecting the top member 84 to the bottom member 86. A first and a second upper inclined beam 90, 92 are arranged in a V-shaped configuration, wherein each upper inclined beam 90, 92 extends between the top member 84 and the center beam 88. Similarly, a first and a second lower inclined beam 94, 96 are arranged in a V-shaped configuration, wherein each lower inclined beam 94, 96 extends between the bottom member 86 and the center beam 88.
Both the first upper inclined beam 90 and the second upper inclined beam 92 form an acute angle as well as the first lower inclined beam 94 and the second lower inclined beam 96 resulting in a symmetric arrangement of the center beam 88, the inclined beams 90, 92, 94, 96 and the top and bottom members 84, 86. This is best seen in the cross sectional view of
As seen in
As best seen in
As seen in the enlarged view of
The invention is not limited to the embodiments described herein, and may be modified or adapted without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16186986 | Sep 2016 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/071953 | 9/1/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/041993 | 3/8/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6983844 | O'Kane | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7591621 | Landrum | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7690875 | Grabau | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704024 | Kootstra | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7967536 | Broderick | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8056203 | Madsen | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8177462 | Riddell | May 2012 | B2 |
8240962 | Livingston | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8313272 | Koike | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8342491 | Jorgensen | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8511921 | Riddell | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8562302 | Bakhuis | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8602700 | Johnson | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8622670 | Vitor | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632286 | Wessel | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8672131 | Nogueira | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8753050 | Cyrus | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8967929 | Frederiksen | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9086052 | Hiremath | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9199570 | Pedersen | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9260875 | Bjoernskov | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9347426 | Landrum | May 2016 | B2 |
9434291 | Kelly | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9494140 | Sigurdsson | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20060251517 | Grabau | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070177954 | Kootstra | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189895 | Kootstra | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070253829 | Wessel | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090003957 | Llorente Gonzalez | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020445 | Koike | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090169323 | Livingston | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100252977 | Jorgensen | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110142660 | Bakhuis | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110308205 | Vitor | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120124833 | Arendt | May 2012 | A1 |
20120192420 | Krogh | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130119002 | Frederiksen | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121780 | Ressel | May 2013 | A1 |
20130216325 | Johnson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130319891 | Lieberknecht | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140193255 | Hancock | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140305743 | Poulsen | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140314576 | Lieberknecht | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140353266 | Frederiksen | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150192104 | Lulker | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150198140 | Sigurdsson | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150369209 | Datta | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102010003694 | Oct 2011 | DE |
2333315 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2832988 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2418376 | Apr 2016 | EP |
2628945 | Nov 2017 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Oct. 5, 2017 corresponding to application No. PCT/EP2017/071953. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190219031 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |