The present invention relates to auto-balancing transportation devices and, more specifically, to strategically enabling and disabling auto-balancing in such devices.
The prior art includes several auto-balancing transport devices. These include the Segway, developed by Kamen et al and disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,230 (among others) and the Solowheel (U.S. Pat. No. 8,807,250) and Hovertrak (U.S. Pat. No. 8,738,278) by Chen, the inventor herein. These three patents are hereby incorporated by reference as though disclosed in their entirety herein.
The prior art also includes Iota™. Iota is a central wheel structure auto-balancing device, like the SoloWheel. A central wheel structure infers that the wheel structure is between (or central) to two foot platforms, a rider straddling the wheel structure while riding. The wheel structure can be a single wheel (rim and tire) or a single rim with multiple tires, or multiple rims and tires coupled together, or the like.
In Iota, the foot platforms are located relatively close to the ground, compared, for example, to SoloWheel and similar devices. Also, since Iota is fairly low in height, i.e., smaller radius wheel, there may be less vertically ascending structure to contact the lower leg of a rider and thereby enhance stability and control (by providing another point of contact).
Specifically, when mounting Iota, a rider typically places one foot on a foot platform, while the other foot remains on the ground. This tilts the device laterally (to the side). If the ground under the rider is sloped in fore-aft, the foot platform the rider is standing on will likely slope also thereby moving the platform from a neutral pitch angle and causing the auto-balance function to move the device to recover the neutral pitch. Similarly, if the placement of the rider's foot on the platform causes the platform to rock or move out of neutral pitch, the auto-balance function will begin moving the device. Movement of the device in this manner makes mounting, for example, placement of the second foot on its platform difficult.
A need thus exists to control the enabling of auto-balance based driving when a rider is mounting the device. Needs also exist for better managing the transition from mounting to riding, for detecting and accommodating rider wobble, and for other rider experiences, such as spin, dismounting and related actions.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an auto-balancing transportation device that overcomes the shortcomings of the prior art.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an auto-balancing transportation device that affords a better mounting and/or use experience for a rider.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide an auto-balancing transportation device that utilizes fore-aft pitch, lateral tilt and/or the presence of a rider's foot or feet to control or influence auto-balance based drive.
These and related objects of the present invention are achieved by use of a transportation device with selective enabling of fore-aft auto-balancing as described herein.
The attainment of the foregoing and related advantages and features of the invention should be more readily apparent to those skilled in the art, after review of the following more detailed description of the invention taken together with the drawings.
Referring to
Device 10 preferably includes two foot platforms 20, 30, a wheel structure 40, a motor 50 (interior to the device) that drives wheel structure 40, a position sensor 50 capable of detecting fore-aft pitch angle and lateral tilt angle, a control circuit 60, a battery 90, a housing 92, a handle 94, and an on/off switch 96. The foot platforms preferably fold in when not in use. Device 10 employs auto-balance based control that detects a deviation of the foot platforms from a neutral pitch and drives the wheel structure forward or backward based on the magnitude and direction of the deviation from the neutral pitch. Auto-balancing devices of this type are known in the art and include those mentioned in the Background of the Invention section above, among others.
Wheel structure 40 is preferably centrally located, side-to-side, and in the embodiment of
Position sensor 50 may be a gyroscopic sensor. A gyroscopic sensor can sense fore-aft pitch angle, lateral tilt angle, acceleration and other parameters. A separate fore-aft pitch angle sensor, lateral tilt sensor, accelerometer(s), and the like, may be used without departing from the present invention.
Control circuit 60 may include a microprocessor or other suitable processing device or arrangement.
Device 10 may also include foot presence sensors 25, 35. These sensors may take several forms, including but not limited to pressure that detect the weight of a rider on a given foot platform, or an electro-magnetic radiation based sensors that detects a foot (or a blockage or reflection of EM radiation) at the foot platforms, or other suitable sensors. In
In an upright position, shown in
In
The present invention strategically controls auto-balancing and related device function to enhance the rider experience, improve safety and facilitate ease of use.
Various experiences and situations that a rider may encounter (and device function related thereto) are now discussed.
At device mounting, a rider typically places one foot on a first foot platform and the other foot on the other foot platform. Since wheel structure 40 is centrally located, stepping on one platform first causes the device to tilt. A user then steps on the other foot platform and the device returns to a laterally upright position.
As discussed above, if auto-balancing is enabled when a user places the first foot on the device, and the ground is sloped in fore-aft, or placement of that foot causes the fore-aft pitch angle to deviate from neutral, then the device will begin to move. Typically, this movement will be rotation as the wheel pivots about the contact point caused by end 21 touching the ground. Movement of the device in this, or any, manner creates a “moving target” for placement of the second foot which, of course, makes mounting additionally difficult.
Accordingly, control circuit 60 is preferably configured to sense the lateral tilt position of the device and not enable auto-balancing (at mounting) until the lateral tilt of the device is less than a threshold value. For example, in
Control circuit 60 is preferably configured to enable auto-balancing at a lateral tilt angle that facilitates mounting and, generally, ease of use. In use embodiment, the tilt angle for AB activation is one at which a rider foot has likely been placed (or is being placed) on the foot platform. In this example above, this might be at 112 or 10 degrees. In this manner, AB is enable soon after foot contact is made, yet not until the rider has both feet contacting the device and thus can better respond or cause device movement.
If it is desired for the device to be more laterally stable before AB is enabled then the tilt angle for AB activation can be less, such as 5 degrees or still less, etc.
The preferred tilt angle for AB activation may vary without departing from the present invention based on factors such as the dimensions of the device (tire, platform size), rider level and other. It may also be programmable (or selected) by the rider.
If, when auto-balancing is being enabled, the device is not at (or near) a neutral fore-aft pitch angle, then the device may quickly lunge forward or backward as it drives toward neutral pitch. This is destabilizing to a rider.
Thus, control circuit 60 is preferably configured such that at auto-balance enabling, if the device is not at the neutral pitch angle, then the reference pitch angle for auto-balance is set at the pitch angle at activation. The reference pitch angle for auto-balance is then shifted to the neutral pitch angle (over a short period of time).
It should be recognized that a goal is to make smooth (or smoother than in prior art devices) the transition to neutral pitch based auto-balance. It should be noted that the value of the initial reference pitch angle and the speed of the shift to the neutral pitch angle may vary without departing from the present invention.
Lateral wobble refers to lateral instability of a rider on the platform and, more specifically, to rapid and alternating changes in the amount and direction of lateral tilt of the device. Accelerometers can detect these rapid and changing movements. Control circuit 60 is preferably configured such that when the rider displays wobble, that the device is “forgiving” and does not disable auto-balancing even when the lateral tilt angle exceeds a threshold for disabling auto-balancing, in the absence of wobbling. In the example above, if auto-balancing is enabled at 10 degrees (and disable if over 10), then in response to a wobble mode detection, the control circuit would allow auto-balancing to continue even if the threshold for disabling is exceeded, for example, until 13 degrees or the like.
In other words, the control circuit is preferably configured to sense rapid alternating lateral accelerations and modify the enabling of fore-aft auto-balance, when detected, to give a rider extended opportunity to recover.
As alluded to above, spin may occur when device 10 moves circularly around the pivot point caused by the foot platform touching the ground. The occurs of spin can be determined or “guessed” by accelerometers and position sensors. In one embodiment, when the lateral tilt angle exceeds a threshold and the gyroscopic sensor indicates rotational movement, auto-balancing is disable to allow the user to regain lateral balance.
In another embodiment, auto-balancing is not disable during spin to allow the user to do tight turns and tricks. In yet another embodiment, disabling due to spin or the degree of spin may be adjusted by the rider, for example, through a mobile device app wirelessly coupled to the device, or by an interface on device 10, or other.
Various types of foot presence sensors are known in the art. While the lateral tilt angle may be used alone for enabling auto-balance, the determination to enable or disable auto-balancing may be done in concert with foot presence sensors 25, 35. For example, control circuit 60 may be configured to enable auto-balancing when the tilt angle is less than a given threshold and the foot presence sensors detects a foot at both platforms.
In a related determination, auto-balancing may be disabled if the absence of a foot is sensed, and/or if that absence is sensed for a predefined period of time.
In yet another embodiment, control circuit 60 may be configured to turn on auto-balancing when a foot is detected at both foot platforms, regardless of lateral tilt angle. This presence may be indicated by the weight of a rider on the platforms or by a detection of the side of the rider's foot electromagnetically or by other methods.
Control circuit 60 may be configured to disable auto-balance when the lateral tilt angle has exceeded a threshold angle. An angle greater than this threshold may suggest that a user has fallen off and is trying to remount, or that the device has crashed and is at an odd angle. The threshold angle for disabling can be the “same” as that for enabling (“same” here may mean 10 or less for enabling and greater than 10 for disabling), or the threshold angles for disabling and enabling may be different, for example, enabling at 10 degrees and disabling at 12 degrees, i.e., once the rider is on the device, the angle for disabling is expanded over that for mounting ease.
While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modification, and this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth, and as fall within the scope of the invention and the limits of the appended claims.
The present application claims the benefit of provisional application No. 62/634,115, filed Feb. 22, 2018, for Selective balancing modes for auto-balancing personal transportation devices by the inventor herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62634115 | Feb 2018 | US |