This application is a national stage application of PCT/EP2010/055640, filed on Apr. 27, 2010, which claims the benefit of and priority to Italian Patent Application No. MI2009A 001214, filed on Jul. 9, 2009, the entire contents of each are incorporated by reference herein.
Certain known cable transportation systems comprise a number of transportation units movable between at least two turnaround stations, and normally comprising cars or chairs. A cable transportation system comprising only cars is known as a cable-car, and one comprising only chairs is known as a chair-lift. In recent years, combination cable transportation systems comprising both chairs and cars have also become popular.
Chair-lifts, or any cable transportation system comprising chairs, involve safety issues, to prevent passengers from falling off.
Certain known chair-lift transportation units normally comprise a supporting frame attached to a draw cable; and a chair comprising a bench and a backrest. To prevent passengers from falling off the chair, each transportation unit is equipped with a safety frame hinged to the supporting frame and movable between a closed position and an open position allowing passengers on and off the chair. The safety frame comprises a front bar which, in the closed position, is located over the bench and in front of the backrest, to prevent passengers from falling off.
Some known transportation units comprise locking devices for locking the safety frame in the closed position along the route between the turnaround stations, and only releasing the safety frame along the route inside the turnaround stations.
The safety frame and locking devices of these known transportation units have done a lot to improve the safety of chair-lifts, but concern over passengers falling off still remains, owing to the safety frame and locking devices failing to prevent passengers from slipping off between the bench and the front bar, even when this is in the closed position. Incidents of this sort mainly involve passengers of small build, such as children, on account of the chairs, and therefore the distance between the front bar and the bench, normally being configured for adult passengers of medium build.
Various solutions have been proposed to at least partly solve the problem of passengers falling off the chair.
A first solution, chronologically, provides in fixing safety barriers to the front bar, as shown on page 10, FIG. 16 of the No. 2/1989 issue of Rivista Internazionale delle Funivie magazine, or on page 15, FIG. 6 of the No. 5/1989 issue of Revue Internationale des Téléphériques magazine.
The above magazines are substantially two issues of the same magazine in different languages, and show the same photograph of a chair produced by the Swiss company Von Roll, and wherein the safety barriers comprise brackets fixed to the front bar. Each bracket is located in front of and centrally with respect to a respective passenger seat, and extends between the front bar and the bench and centrally with respect to the passenger seat when the safety frame is in the closed position. In actual use, the safety barrier is located at least partly between the passenger's thighs, to prevent the passenger from falling off.
This technical solution was later taken up by the Swiss company Garaventa in Austrian Patent No. 411,046 B, in which the bracket is fitted in rotary manner to the front bar.
Other solutions proposed by Innova Patent GmbH in European Patent No. 1,721,801 B1 substantially all comprise a safety barrier having a contact surface located under and extending parallel to the front bar, and pressed elastically against the legs of the passenger(s) sitting in the chair.
The safety barriers described in European Patent No. 1,721,801 B1 are characterized by adapting elastically to the passenger's build, but are sometimes expensive to produce, call for careful maintenance, cause a certain amount of discomfort by exerting concentrated pressure on a small area of the passenger's thighs, and may give rise to lateral buckling under combined bending and compressive stress, when the movable member is not guided properly.
Generally speaking, the above-described solutions pose drawbacks in terms of passenger comfort.
The present disclosure relates to a transportation unit for cable transportation systems.
According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, there is provided a transportation unit for cable transportation systems, wherein the transportation unit is movable in a travelling direction, and comprises a chair with a bench; a safety frame movable between an open position and a closed position and comprising a front bar; and at least one safety barrier, which is fixed to the front bar, extends predominantly between the front bar and the bench when the safety frame is in the closed position, and comprises a support with an anchoring portion fixed to the front bar, and at least one projecting portion, which projects from the anchoring portion, is elastically flexible under stress oriented in given or designated directions, and is substantially rigid under stress oriented in other directions.
The barrier can be located centrally with respect to a seat on the bench, and, being flexible under stress in given or designated directions, causes no injury to passengers in the event of accidental contact, and reduces the section through which the passenger's body could otherwise slip accidentally off the bench. Moreover, flexibility is easily controllable and poses no lateral buckling problems.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the projecting portion comprises at least one wall crosswise to the travelling direction, integral with the anchoring portion, and having at least one weakened portion to promote flexibility of the projecting portion and so define the given or designated stress directions.
The flexibility of the projecting portion can thus be controlled easily, to achieve a good safety-comfort compromise for passengers of any build.
It is thus an advantage of the present disclosure to provide a transportation unit for cable transportation systems, which is highly effective in preventing passengers from falling off, and at the same time provides for a high degree of comfort for passengers of any build.
Additional features and advantages are described in, and will be apparent from, the following Detailed Description and the figures.
A number of non-limiting embodiments of the present disclosure will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring now to the example embodiments of the present disclosure illustrated in
Transportation unit 1 is movable in a travelling direction D (as seen in
Chair 5 comprises a bench 7—in the example shown, a bench 7 with eight seats 8—and a backrest 9; and each seat 8 is formed ergonomically in the body of bench 7.
Safety frame 6 comprises a front bar 10 extending along an axis A2 parallel to axis A1; and two side bars 11, each connecting front bar 10 to a respective hinge 12 at backrest 9.
Safety frame 6 comprises four foot-rest devices 13 equally spaced along front bar 10, and each comprising a hub 14, a supporting bar 15, and a foot-rest 16. Hub 14 is fixed to front bar 10 and connected by supporting bar 15 to foot-rest 16, which extends parallel to front bar 10 and on opposite sides of supporting bar 15.
In one alternative embodiment, hub 14 is mounted to rotate about front bar 10, so foot-rest 16 can be adjusted even when safety frame 6 is locked in the closed position.
Safety frame 6 also comprises eight safety barriers 17, each located at a seat 8—more specifically, centrally with respect to seat 8 when safety frame 6 is in the closed position, so that each safety barrier 17 extends partly between the legs of the passenger (not shown in
Each safety barrier 17 is fixed to front bar 10, and comprises a sleeve 18 fitted about front bar 10; and a projection 19 extending from sleeve 18 towards bench 7. Depending on requirements, projection 19 may be of different lengths, even to the point of the free end of projection 19 contacting bench 7 (as shown by the dash line in
With reference to
In one embodiment, support 20 is fixed rigidly to front bar 10, and cover 21 fully encloses support 20 and portions of front bar 10 adjacent to support 20. In other words, support 20 supports cover 21, which is made of more elastic material than support 20. In addition, cover 21 is elastically deformable in any direction, whereas support 20 only flexes elastically under stress oriented in given or designated directions. In one such embodiment, support 20 is made of polymer material, and cover 21 of polymer foam. And the flexibility of support 20 is substantially determined by its geometry.
With reference to
With reference to
Under stress in the opposite direction to the one described, wall 25 acts as a tie, preventing flexing of wall 24.
With reference to
Anchoring portion 22 comprises two half-shells 29, 30 parallel to front bar 10 and fitted together, to grip front bar 10, by screws or other fasteners (not shown in the drawings). In the example shown, walls 24 and 25 are integral with each other and formed integrally with half-shell 29.
In other words, the geometry of support 20 permits flexing of projecting portion 23. More specifically, the location of groove 28 determines the flexing path and direction of projecting portion 23; and the amount by which projecting portion 23 flexes is substantially determined by the depth and width of groove 28.
Elastic deformation under stress of support 20 of safety barrier 17 can thus be controlled, to achieve transportation units 1 which ensure effective fall prevention combined with a high degree of passenger comfort.
Though specific reference is made herein to a chair 5 with eight seats 8, it is understood that the present disclosure also applies to transportation units comprising any number or quantity of seats.
Number 31 in
For each seat 8, transportation unit 31 comprises a safety barrier 34 which, in use, extends partly about the thighs 33 of passenger (e.g., dummy) 32.
With reference to
Support 35 is fixed rigidly to front bar 10, is flexible under stress oriented in given or designated directions, and is substantially rigid under stress in other directions.
In one embodiment, support 35 and flexible sheets 36 are formed integral with one another from polymer material. In one embodiment, support 35 and flexible sheets 36 are formed integral with one another, with a shell of polymer material filled with foam material. The flexibility of support 35 is substantially determined by its geometry.
In the example shown, support 35 comprises an anchoring portion 37 fixed to and extending parallel to front bar 10; and three projecting portions 38, each of which projects from anchoring portion 37 towards bench 7 when frame 6 is in the closed position (as seen in
In one embodiment, each wall 39 has weakened portions to promote elastic deformation in given or designated areas. More specifically, each wall 39 has a face 40; a face 41 opposite face 40 (as seen in
Faces 40 of walls 39 are substantially triangular, with a vertex of the triangle facing bench 7 (as seen in
With reference to
In one embodiment, anchoring portion 37 comprises a tubular member 45, which has a longitudinal slit 46 by which to insert front bar 10, and is fixed to front bar 10 by bolts 47. Anchoring portion 37 also comprises a finned plate 48 and a plate 49, which are incorporated in tubular member 45 to increase the rigidity of tubular member 45, and are engaged by bolts 47, which also engage front bar 10.
With reference to
With reference to
In one embodiment, safety barrier 34 is flat, to form a sort of shield in front of the passenger. This shield ensures a high degree of safety by virtue of the large area covered, performs rigidly to prevent the passenger from falling (sliding off between the bench and front bar), but flexes in response to other than falling passenger movements, thus combining both passenger safety and comfort.
Despite covering a large area, safety barrier 34 is relatively compact, and is easy to produce and install, even on transportation units not originally configured for this type of fixture.
The present disclosure also covers embodiments not described herein and equivalent embodiments, which nevertheless fall within the protective scope of the accompanying Claims. That is, it should be understood that various changes and modifications to the presently preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present subject matter and without diminishing its intended advantages. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MI2009A1214 | Jul 2009 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/055640 | 4/27/2010 | WO | 00 | 3/23/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/003639 | 1/13/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
472211 | Fralinger | Apr 1892 | A |
1944446 | McGowen | Jan 1934 | A |
2662587 | McIlvaine | Dec 1953 | A |
2710650 | Sowder | Jun 1955 | A |
2985224 | Sowder | May 1961 | A |
3170412 | Sowder | Feb 1965 | A |
3934517 | Hirsig | Jan 1976 | A |
3975037 | Hontschik et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4185562 | Hatori et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4226187 | Paulsen et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4269123 | Segafredo | May 1981 | A |
4280411 | Katayose et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4462314 | Kunczynski | Jul 1984 | A |
4470355 | Kunczynski | Sep 1984 | A |
4473011 | Wuschek | Sep 1984 | A |
4640197 | Brian | Feb 1987 | A |
4641587 | Dalliard | Feb 1987 | A |
4671187 | Kunczynski | Jun 1987 | A |
4833997 | Cathiard | May 1989 | A |
4858997 | Shubin | Aug 1989 | A |
4898100 | Brochand | Feb 1990 | A |
4909574 | Sedlack | Mar 1990 | A |
5107771 | Kainz | Apr 1992 | A |
5113768 | Brown | May 1992 | A |
5226368 | Brochand et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5515789 | Brochand et al. | May 1996 | A |
5562040 | Egli | Oct 1996 | A |
5582109 | Levi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5595122 | Levi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
6036282 | Clarke et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6345578 | Pabst | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6543366 | Pabst et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6585232 | Rechenmacher | Jul 2003 | B2 |
7410068 | Andreetto | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7549377 | Pabst | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20020026839 | Lehtovaara | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020088368 | Pabst et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20060249718 | Levi | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070169660 | Pabst | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070246993 | Switzeny | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080115689 | Heil et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090165666 | Pabst et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165668 | Andreetto | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
315910 | Jun 1974 | AT |
342655 | Apr 1978 | AT |
373832 | Feb 1984 | AT |
388146 | May 1989 | AT |
390926 | Jul 1990 | AT |
404010 | Jul 1998 | AT |
405269 | Jun 1999 | AT |
411046 | Sep 2003 | AT |
389087 | Mar 2008 | AT |
259291 | Jan 1949 | CH |
360704 | Mar 1962 | CH |
542740 | Oct 1973 | CH |
554761 | Oct 1974 | CH |
671929 | Oct 1989 | CH |
423865 | Jan 1926 | DE |
2020746 | Dec 1971 | DE |
2101743 | Sep 1972 | DE |
2636888 | May 1977 | DE |
3109294 | Oct 1982 | DE |
3834116 | May 1989 | DE |
3927757 | Mar 1991 | DE |
4127373 | Feb 1993 | DE |
9405016 | Jun 1994 | DE |
202007006169 | Jul 2007 | DE |
0055955 | Jul 1982 | EP |
0135239 | Mar 1985 | EP |
0158095 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0218306 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0218897 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0281205 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0491632 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0517622 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0613807 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0640518 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0678433 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0687607 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0692418 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0745526 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0970864 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1077167 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1088729 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1174323 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1195305 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1209055 | May 2002 | EP |
1331151 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1364853 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1419950 | May 2004 | EP |
1721801 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1930224 | Jun 2008 | EP |
891743 | Mar 1944 | FR |
913146 | Aug 1946 | FR |
1100001 | Sep 1955 | FR |
1199721 | Dec 1959 | FR |
1423648 | Jan 1966 | FR |
2340895 | Sep 1977 | FR |
2387830 | Nov 1978 | FR |
2391450 | Dec 1978 | FR |
2392858 | Dec 1978 | FR |
2562857 | Oct 1985 | FR |
2640247 | Jun 1990 | FR |
2670452 | Jun 1992 | FR |
2706404 | Dec 1994 | FR |
2823482 | Oct 2002 | FR |
2854853 | Nov 2004 | FR |
2867142 | Sep 2005 | FR |
1326264 | Aug 1973 | GB |
1353030 | May 1974 | GB |
1460106 | Dec 1976 | GB |
2017024 | Sep 1979 | GB |
WO2004067347 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO2004085221 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2005032901 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2008020021 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO2008129017 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2008129019 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009000059 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO2009019259 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO2009053485 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Magazine Article entitled: No. Feb. 1989 Issue of Rivista Internazionale delle Funivie, p. 10, Figure 16, Nov. 1989. |
Magazine Article entitled: No. May 1989 Issue of Revue Internationale des Telepheriques, p. 15, Figure 6, Jul. 1989. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120186485 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |