Motor refers to an electric motor or an electric generator. Core refers to a stator or rotor core. Winding refers to a stator or rotor winding. To create flux density in a core of a motor, a number of turns composed of conductors are wound into the slots of a core. The set of turns wound together in a slot is referred to as a coil. The number of turns per each coil is calculated based on the supply voltage, the winding configuration (e.g., number of parallel circuits, winding pitch, winding connection, i.e., star or delta, etc.), the number of poles, and the motor rating. A stack refers to the combination of all the turns together.
However, there are physical constraints on how the coils can be constructed.
The density of the core flux (also referred to as the flux density) is proportional to the flux value and inversely proportional to the available core area. Thus, as the slot size increases, the core tooth area decreases and the core flux density increases. As the core flux density increases, the losses in the core increase as well. These losses are primarily generated in the form of heat, but may also be generated in the form of core vibrations.
The current that flows in the conductors also generate losses that are dependent on the current density. The current density is proportional to the current flowing in the conductor and inversely proportional to the area of the conductor. The losses in the conductor are proportional to the square of the current and proportional to the resistance of the conductor. The resistance of the conductor is inversely proportional to the cross sectional area of the conductor. Accordingly, losses in the conductor are inversely proportional to the cross sectional area of the conductor.
Accordingly, stator cores need balance between core area and conductor size. A larger core area reduces the core losses (due to reduced flux density) but increases the conductor losses (due to smaller slot sizes and reduced conductor area). A smaller core area increases the core losses (due to an increase in flux density) but decreases conductor losses (due to a larger slot and increased conductor area).
Additional constraints include the slot widths being large enough to be mechanically strong to avoid breakage and resonance vibrations. Traditionally, the ratio of the width of the conductor to the thickness of the conductor is limited to (a) not more than 4:1 for a conductor between 1 and 2 mm thick, (b) not more than 5:1 for a conductor thicker than 2 mm, and (c) not less than 1.5:1. When the conductor width to thickness ratio is too large, the conductor insulation may become damaged during manufacturing, or the conductor may deform during manufacturing. When the conductor is too close to a square, manufacturing of the coils becomes difficult, and the conductors tend to twist.
It is typical that the leg of two different coils are inserted into the same slot. Thus, the available slot height under the wedge is consumed by the total of the two coils. Additionally, each conductor is insulated using either one layer of insulation or a combination of multiple layers of insulation. This insulation is referred to herein as conductor insulation.
In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a transposition coil including a plurality of conductor turns arranged in at least two separate stacks and an outer main wall insulation that encircles the at least two separate stacks. Each of the at least two separate stacks is provided with dedicated main wall insulation that encircles exactly one of the at least two separate stacks.
In some instances, the at least two separate stacks include a first stack having n number of turns and a second stack having n+1 number of turns. In some instances, the plurality of conductor turns are arranged in exactly two stacks, and the total number of conductor turns is odd. In some instances, the total number of conductor turns is 27. In some instances, the total number of conductor turns is 35. In some instances, a width of each conductor of the plurality of conductors is less than or equal to approximately 10 millimeters, and a height of each conductor of the plurality of conductors is greater than or equal to approximately 0.5 millimeters. In some instances, each conductor turn of the plurality of conductor turns is independently insulated. In some instances, the plurality of conductor turns are arranged in exactly three separate stacks. In some instances, the exactly three separate stacks includes a first stack having n number of turns, a second stack having n number of turns, and a third stack having n−1 number or n+1 number of turns. In some instances, the total number of conductor turns is 34. In some instances, the total number of conductor turns is 36.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a transposition coil including a plurality of turns arranged in three or more separately-insulated stacks. The three or more stacks are cooperatively insulated with an outer main wall insulation that encircles the three or more separate stacks.
In some instances, the number of turns per stack is different among the three or more separate stacks. In some instances, the three or more separate stacks includes a first stack having n number of turns, a second stack having n number of turns, and a third stack having n−1 number or n+1 number of turns. In some instances, the plurality of conductor turns are arranged in exactly three stacks, and the total number of conductor turns is odd. In some instances, the total number of conductor turns is 35. In some instances, the total number of conductor turns is 34. In some instances, the total number of conductor turns is 36. In some instances, a width of each conductor of the plurality of conductors is less than or equal to approximately 10 millimeters, and a height of each conductor of the plurality of conductors is greater than or equal to approximately 0.5 millimeters.
In another aspects, the present disclosure provides a method of manufacturing a transposition coil stack. The method includes providing a conductor and forming a first turn of the transposition coil stack. Forming the first turn includes defining, by bending the conductor, a start of a loop, winding a first straight portion of the conductor toward a first looping pin, wherein the first straight portion extends substantially along a first axis, winding a first loop portion of the conductor around the first looping pin, winding a second straight portion of the conductor toward a second looping pin located on an opposite side of the loop from the first looping pin, winding a second loop portion of the conductor around the second looping pin, and winding a third straight portion of the conductor toward the start of the loop, wherein the third straight portion extends substantially along the first axis.
In some instances, the method includes forming a bend in the conductor. In some instances, forming the bend includes bending a first bend portion of the conductor on a conductor edge at an angle of approximately 45 degrees to the first axis and bending a second bend portion of the conductor on the conductor edge such that a portion of the conductor extends along a second axis parallel to the first axis. In some instances, the method includes forming a second turn. In some instances, the method includes bending a third bend portion of the conductor upwards along a y-axis and bending a fourth bend portion of the conductor downwards along the y-axis, wherein a bottom of the conductor is in contact with a top of the conductor, and wherein the third bend portion and the fourth bend portion extend along the first axis or the second axis. In some instances, the method includes bending a first bend portion of the conductor on a conductor edge at an angle of approximately 45 degrees to a second axis and bending a second bend portion of the conductor on the conductor edge such that a portion of the conductor extends along the first axis and the first axis is parallel to the second axis. In some instances, the method includes bending the conductor on a conductor edge in an S shape such that a first bend portion of the conductor extends across the first axis and a second bend portion of the conductor extends across a second axis. In some instances, the method is repeated until a total of six turns are created. In some instances, the method includes forming a plurality of subsequent turns.
In another aspects, the present disclosure provides a method of manufacturing a transposition coil stack. The method includes providing a conductor, forming, by bending the conductor, six turns of the transposition coil stack, calculating a volts per turn value, determining, using the calculated volts per turn value, a thickness of turn insulation to be used in the transposition coil stack, and applying the turn insulation to the transposition coil stack.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method of manufacturing a transposition coil. The method includes providing a first conductor and a second conductor in at least two separate stacks, wherein the first conductor extends along a first axis and the second conductor extends along a second axis, forming a double stack, forming a bridge connection between the at least two separate stacks, providing each of the two separate stacks with a dedicated main wall insulation that encircles exactly one of the at least two separate stacks, and providing an outer main wall insulation that encircles the at least two separate stacks.
In some instances, the method includes insulating the bridge connection. In some instances, the bridge connection is a double series stack top to bottom side bridge design. In some instances, forming the bridge connection includes bending a first end portion of the second conductor on a conductor edge substantially 90 degrees away from the first conductor such that at least part of the first end portion extends along an axis orthogonal to the first axis, bending a second end portion of the second conductor substantially 90 degrees downward along a y-axis such that the second end portion is in contact with the conductor edge, and bending a bottom end portion such that the second end is bent at substantially 90 degrees toward the first conductor, wherein the bottom end portion is configured to pass across a first turn of the second conductor and the bottom end portion is in contact with a bottom of the second conductor. In some instances, the method includes winding the at least two separate stacks in opposite directions. In some instances, the bridge connection includes connecting a top of one stack to a bottom of a separate stack. In some instances, the method includes forming a plurality of turns. In some instances, the method includes forming an odd number of turns. In some instances, forming the bridge connection includes extending a turn of the first conductor around the stack of the second conductor, and connecting the turn of the first conductor to a flipped-over stack of the second conductor. In some instances, forming the bridge connection includes extending a turn of the second conductor around a turn of the first conductor and connecting the turn of the second conductor to a flipped-over turn of the first conductor.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
Before the method is described, it is noted that
Depending on the machine design, a dedicated turn insulation 3 may be applied. For example, each turn A-E is covered with one or more layers of mica paper reinforced with glass cloth, polyester film, or polyester mat that constitute the turn insulation 3. The turn insulation 3 extends around the collection of insulated conductors 1 in the turn, rather than around the individual insulated conductors 1. Main wall insulation 4 is provided outside the turn insulation 3, if present, and includes several layers of tape, that may include one or more layers of mica paper reinforced with glass cloth, polyester film, or polyester mat, and polyimide film, one or more layers of layers of mica paper reinforced with glass cloth, polyester film, and one or more layer of aramid-backed mica tape reinforced with glass or polyester. The main wall insulation 4 is wrapped around the turns A-E of the coil collectively, rather than wrapped around the turns individually like the turn insulation 3. Furthermore, a corona shield tape 5 can be provided outside the main wall insulation 4. The corona shield tape 5 is a low resistivity tape (e.g., 300 to 1000 Ohm/cm) including glass fabric, impregnated with an electrically conductive varnish, and optionally nano particles, to improve electrical and thermal properties as well as erosion resistance.
A stress grading tape 6 can be provided outside the corona shield tape 5. The stress grading tape 6 is a voltage variable resistivity tape including woven polyester fabric tape with selvage, impregnated with an electrically semi conductive varnish. A sealing tape 7 can be provided outside the stress grading tape 6. The sealing tape 7 forms an outer layer that is smooth (reducing build-up of surface contaminants) and waterproof surface finish. The sealing tape 7 can be a glass or polyester fabric tape impregnated with a thermosetting epoxy resin.
Table 1 provides an example calculation of a possible conductor size for a 1×1 conductor (e.g., one conductor in the width and one conductor in the height, per turn). The turn size is provided as 1×(11.96×2.02)×1, meaning (from left to right) one conductor in width, with a width of 11.96 by a thickness of 2.02, and one conductor in weight, per turn. As shown in Table 1, the resulting conductor ratio is larger than the desired maximum ratio of 5:1.
In some instances, the conductor may be split into two or more parallel conductors in the direction of the width. Table 2 provides an example calculation of a possible conductor size with a 2×1 split (e.g., two conductors in the width and one conductor in the height, per turn). The turn size is provided as 2×(5.88×2.02)×1. As shown in Table 2, a 2×1 conductor section has the desired width to thickness ratio (less than 5:1).
Alternatively, conductors may be in series instead of in parallel, thereby doubling the number of turns per slot. Coils having conductors in series may henceforth be referred to as a terrace coil or a transposition coil. In a terrace or transposition coil, the windings may be configured to be two conductors in width and one conductor in height. However, the two conductors in width are connected in series, and the one conductor in height is singular. Effectively, half the number of turns is achieved by each of the two vertical sets of conductors. Table 4 provides an example calculation for terrace coils.
Embodiments described herein provide manufacturing methods for terrace coils. Conductors are not always cut until the coil is complete, but figures and embodiments provided herein may illustrate cut sections for illustrative purposes only. Dotted arrows are provided to illustrate the direction of looping of the coils.
One method of manufacturing provides for the manufacturing of a “Zig-Zag-Then-Step” coil. For example,
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil; and
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts).
In a parallel conductor coil, such as that shown in
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
This calculated Maximum Volt Per Turn value impacts the determination of the type and thickness of turn insulation to be used in the parallel conductor coil, and may impact the overall size of the insulated coil. For terrace coils, however the Maximum Volt Per Turn is not necessarily equal to the Simple Volt Per Turn. For example, the Maximum Volt Per Turn for the terrace coil of
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
Vtmax.zzts=Calculated Maximum Volt Per Turn for Zig-Zag-Then-Step coil (in Volts).
Accordingly, by comparing Equations 2 and 3, one can see that conductor insulation may be significantly thicker or of a different material for the Zig-Zag-Then-Step coil compared to a parallel conductor coil in order to compensate for the higher Maximum Volt Per Turn.
Additionally, as the number of turns increase, the length required for these transitions increases proportionally, limiting how many turns can be manufactured onto the overhang portion of the coil. The overhang portion is, for example, a portion of the winding that is longer than the stator core length, and therefore “hangs” past the stator core. In some instances, the transitions of the turns may be distributed around the conductor 40 to increase the number of turns that may be accommodated. For example,
Another method of manufacturing described herein provides for an “-Then-Step-Zig-Zag” coil. For example,
For the example six turn, -Then-Step-Zig-Zag series coil illustrated in
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil; and
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts).
In a parallel conductor coil, such as that shown in
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
This calculated Maximum Volt Per Turn value impacts the determination of the type and thickness of turn insulation to be used in the parallel conductor coil, and may impact the overall size of the insulated coil. For series coils, however the Maximum Volt Per Turn is not necessarily equal to the Simple Volt Per Turn. For example, the Maximum Volt Per Turn for the series coil of
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
Vtmax.εtszz=Calculated Maximum Volt Per Turn for -Then-Step-Zig-Zag coil (in Volts).
Accordingly, by comparing Equations 5 and 6, one can see that conductor insulation may be significantly thicker or of a different material for the -Then-Step-Zig-Zag coil compared to a parallel conductor coil in order to compensate for the higher Maximum Volt Per Turn, however less so than the Zig-Zag-Then-Step coil.
Additionally, as the number of turns increase, the length required for these transitions increases proportionally, limiting how many turns can be manufactured onto the overhand portion of the coil. In some instances, the transitions of the turns may be distributed around the conductor 170 to increase the number of turns that may be accommodated. For example,
As shown in
The -Then-Step-Zig-Zag method of manufacturing the terrace coils provides reduced risk of pinch points in the insulation, as the “Zig-Zag” transitions and the “Step” transitions are manufactured separately. Additionally, the -Then-Step-Zig-Zag method introduces less physical stress on the conductor 170, thereby reducing risk of stress fractures and hairline cracks, and reducing risk of inter-turn failures.
Another method of manufacturing described herein provides for a “Double-series-stack-top-to-bottom-bridge” coil. For example,
The bending illustrated between
To achieve a series connection, the top of one stack is connected to the bottom of the other stack, forming a “bridge connection.”
Referring now to
The bridge connection 364 needs to be insulated from the conductors in the stack. In some instances, this is achieved by insulating or taping the bridge connection 364 instead of increasing the conductor cover (as done for the Zig-Zag-Then-Step coil and the -Then-Step-Zig-Zag). While only six total turns are provided in the example of
Excluding the bridge connection and ignoring the stack-to-stack volt per turn, the volt per turn can be calculated in a similar manner as previously described. For the example six turn, Double-series-stack-top-to-bottom-side-bridge coil illustrated in
Turn in each coil is provided using Equation 7:
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil; and
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts).
In a parallel conductor coil, such as that shown in
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
This calculated Maximum Volt Per Turn value impacts the determination of the type and thickness of turn insulation to be used in the parallel conductor coil, and may impact the overall size of the insulated coil. For series coils, however the Maximum Volt Per Turn is not necessarily equal to the Simple Volt Per Turn. For example, the Maximum Volt Per Turn for the series coil of
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
Vtmax.Dssttbsb=Calculated Maximum Volt Per Turn for Double-series-stack-top-to-bottom-side-bridge coil (in Volts).
One advantage of the Double-series-stack-top-to-bottom-side-bridge method of manufacturing coils is that the space needed for the bridge connection 364 is not dependent on the total number of turns. For example,
An alternative method of creating the bridge connection includes placing the bridge connection between two stacks. For example, starting with the double stack 350 from
Referring now to
The bridge connection 414 needs to be insulated from the conductors in the stack. In some instances, this is achieved by insulating or taping the bridge connection 414 instead of increasing the conductor cover (as done for the Zig-Zag-Then-Step coil and the -Then-Step-Zig-Zag). While only six total turns are provided in the example of
Excluding the bridge connection and ignoring the stack-to-stack volt per turn, the volt per turn can be calculated in a similar manner as previously described. For the example six turn, Double-series-stack-top-to-bottom-center-bridge coil illustrated in
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil; and
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts).
In a parallel conductor coil, such as that shown in
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
This calculated Maximum Volt Per Turn value impacts the determination of the type and thickness of turn insulation to be used in the parallel conductor coil, and may impact the overall size of the insulated coil. For series coils, however the Maximum Volt Per Turn is not necessarily equal to the Simple Volt Per Turn. For example, the Maximum Volt Per Turn for the series coil of
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
Vtmax.Dssttbsb=Calculated Maximum Volt Per Turn for Double-series-stack-top-to-bottom-center-bridge coil (in Volts).
One advantage of the Double-series-stack-top-to-bottom-center-bridge method of manufacturing coils is that the space needed for the bridge connection 414 is not dependent on the total number of turns. For example,
Another method of manufacturing described herein provides for a “Reverse-wound-double-series-stack” coil. For example,
For the Reverse-wound-double-series-stack coil, the second stack is wound in the opposite direction. Beginning with
As illustrated in
To achieve a series connection, the top of one stack is connected to the top of the other stack. The inter-stack connection may henceforth be referred to as a “bridge connection”. The bridge connection may be made using either one of the ends of the stacks, or may be made using an additional piece of conductor. With reference to
The bridge connection needs to be insulated from the conductors in the stack. In some instances, this is achieved by insulating or taping the bridge connection instead of increasing the conductor cover (as done for the Zig-Zag-Then-Step coil and the -Then-Step-Zig-Zag). While only six total turns are provided in the example of
Excluding the bridge connection and ignoring the stack-to-stack volt per turn, the volt per turn can be calculated in a similar manner as previously described. For the example six turn, Reverse-wound-double-series-stack coil illustrated in
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil; and
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts).
In a parallel conductor coil, such as that shown in
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
For series coils, the Maximum Volt Per Turn is not necessarily equal to the Simple Volt Per Turn. For example, the Maximum Volt Per Turn for the series coil of
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
Vtmax.rwdss=Calculated Maximum Volt Per Turn for Reverse-wound-double-series-stack coil (in Volts).
One advantage of the Reverse-wound-double-series-stack method of manufacturing coils is that the space needed for the bridge connection is not dependent on the total number of turns. For example,
Returning to the double stack 350 from
Next, the second conductor 351 is flipped over and aligned next to the first conductor 310, as shown in
In another embodiment of forming the bridge connection, the inner or outer turn of the first conductor 310 may be extended around and connected to the flipped-over inner or outer stack of the second conductor 351. In another embodiment, the inner or outer turn from the second conductor 351 can be extended around and connected to the flipped-over inner or outer turn of the first conductor 310. The coil leads “in” and “out” may also be adjusted for a given coil and winding (i.e., to enter and exit the coil either adjacent or separate at the top or bottom, inside or outside of either of the stacks). A cross-section of the Overhang-knuckle-series-bridge coil is provided in
The bridge connection needs to be insulated from the conductors in the stack. In some instances, this is achieved by insulating or taping the bridge connection instead of increasing the conductor cover (as done for the Zig-Zag-Then-Step coil and the -Then-Step-Zig-Zag). While only six total turns are provided in the example of
Excluding the bridge connection and ignoring the stack-to-stack volt per turn, the volt per turn can be calculated in a similar manner as previously described. For the example six turn, Overhang-knuckle-series-bridge coil illustrated in
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil; and
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts).
In a parallel conductor coil, such as that shown in
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
For series coils, the Maximum Volt Per Turn is not necessarily equal to the Simple Volt Per Turn. For example, the Maximum Volt Per Turn for the series coil of
Vc=Volts per coil;
t=Number of turns in the coil;
vt=Calculated Simple Volt Per Turn (in Volts); and
Vtmax.oksb=Calculated Maximum Volt Per Turn for Overhang-knuckle-series-bridge coil (in Volts).
One advantage of the Overhang-knuckle-series-bridge method of manufacturing coils is that the space needed for the bridge connection is not dependent on the total number of turns. For example,
Next, main wall insulation is provided to address the high turn to turn voltages between the different stacks. As previously described, the traditional method of manufacturing coils insulated the combined stack with a number of layers dependent on the required voltage insulation. In embodiments described herein, some layers of the main wall insulation are used to insulate each stack individually. Next, the remaining layers of tape are taped around the combined stack, as shown in
Equation 19 provides the minimum main wall insulation thickness:
thmin.main.wall=Minimum main wall insulation thickness;
Vphase=Phase voltage of winding; and
Vtmax=Maximum allowed voltage per unit of measure thickness.
In some embodiments, Vtmax is 2500 V/mm. In such an embodiment, for a 13800 V machine with a phase voltage of 7967 V, the minimum main wall insulation is 3.19 mm (or 125.5 mil). In an embodiment where Vtmax is 3000 V/mm, for a 13800 V machine with a phase voltage of 7967 V, the minimum main wall insulation is 2.66 mm (or 104.6 mil).
In some instances, the insulation may be taped with a 50% overlap (also referred to as a half lap). The number of layers of tape can thus be calculated with Equation 20:
thmin.main.wall=Minimum main wall insulation thickness;
lamain.wall=Number of layers of tape;
thtape=Thickness of tape; and
lap=Overlap % of tape.
As one example, for a 13800 V machine with a phase voltage of 7967 V, where Vtmax is 2500 V/mm, the minimum main wall insulation is 3.19 mm (or 125.5 mil). If the main wall insulation is taped with a 50% lap of 6 mil tape, 11 layers of tape are required. In contrast, the distributed main wall insulation portion is not dependent on the machine voltage, but the simple turn voltage (vt) (previously calculated in Equation 1). For example, Equation 21 provides the minimum distributed main wall insulation:
thmin.dist.main.wall=Minimum distributed main wall insulation thickness;
Vt=Simple turn voltage; and
Vt2max=Maximum allowed voltage per unit of measure thickness. A different material may be used for the distributed main wall insulation that the rest of the main wall insulation.
For a Vt2max value of 1000 V/mm, and a machine with a simple volt per turn of 100 V, the minimum main wall insulation is 0.1 mm. In cases with insulation tape with a 50% overlap, the number of layers of distributed main wall tape is calculated with Equation 22:
thdist.min.main.wall=Minimum distributed main wall insulation thickness;
ladist.main.wall=Number of layers of tape;
thtape=Thickness of tape; and
lap=Overlap % of tape.
For example, for a machine with a simple volt per turn of 100 V, a minimum main wall insulation of 0.1 mm, and a distributed main wall insulation taped with a 50% lap of 0.1 mm thick tape, 1 layer of tape will be required. The practical thickness of the distributed main wall insulation is provided by Equation 23:
Thus, the main wall tape thickness can be reduced by the thickness of the distributed main wall insulation, and thus fewer layers of main wall tape are applied. This has advantages to the configuration of the inter-stack connections that can be used, as the maximum volt per turn will remain equal to the simple volt per turn, reducing the need for thicker or different material additional turn insulation applied to each turn. The total main wall insulation thus remains constant on all sides of the stacks, ensuring sufficient insulation for the required voltage class, with only the additional tape in-between needed for the stack-to-stack voltages.
To keep the final coil shape rectangular, the stack heights of each stack are kept close to identical. Accordingly, in the Zig-Zag-Then-Step and -Then-Step-Zig-Zag manufacturing methods, the conductor sizes and number of turns per stack may be equal. However, as a result, the number of turns per coil are an equal number. When designing the motor and generator, the number of turns is one of the determining factors of the flux density in the core, teeth, air gap, and the like. These influence the overall performance of the design. Having only an equal number of turns available for selection may limit the design configurations that can be manufactured.
One example motor has design constraints of 564.6 hp, 6900 V, 4 pole, 50 Hz, 80 Kelvin temperature rise, starting current maximum of 6.00 pu (=600%), starting torque of at least 1.00 pu (=100%), pull out torque of at least 1.85 pu (=185%), and flux densities in any part of the core not to exceed 1.6 T. Using coils that can only have equal number of turns, the maximum rating of this frame size is 544.5 hp, while adhering to the design constraints. Table 5 provides performance data of such an example motor with 22 turns per coil.
Calculations decreasing the turns in Table 5 to the next lower equal number (20 turns) are provided in Table 6. A motor having 20 turns per coil with the same design constraints is unable to achieve the desired performance. Although the output power rating may be achieved, the starting current exceeds the requirements by more than 10% and the stator core is saturing, as the top of slot flux density exceeds 1.6 T. To correct this, a larger frame size may need to be implemented.
However, the Double-series-stack-top-to-bottom-bridge, the Reverse-wound-double-series-stack, and the Overhang-knuckle-series-bridge Manufacturing methods allow for using an odd number of turns. Table 7 provides an example motor including 21 turns per coil and having the same design restrictions as previously listed. As shown in Table 7, the example motor meets the design requirements while maintaining the same frame size.
However, to maintain the coil as a rectangular section, the number of turns per coil in one stack can not be reduced and does not provide an executable coil. Rather, an odd number of turns may be achieved by adjusting the conductor size of the second stack to maintain the original conductor cross sectional area, while adhering to the total stack height required to match the first stack, as provided below in Equations 24, 25, and 26.
A
conductor
=w
stack1
·h
stack1
=w
stack2
·h
stack2 [Equation 24]
Aconductor=Area of the conductor;
wstack1=Width of conductor in stack 1;
hstack1=Height (or thickness) of conductor in stack 1;
wstack2=Width of conductor in stack 2; and
hstack2=Height (or thickness) of conductor in stack 2.
H
stack
=t
stack1·(hstack1+2·cconductor)=tstack2·(hstack2+2·cconductor) [Equation 25]
Hstack=Height of the stack (not including dispersed main wall insulation);
tstack1=number of turns in stack 1;
hstack1=Height (or thickness) of conductor in stack 1;
Cconductor=Thickness of conductor covering per side;
tstack2=number of turns in stack 2; and
hstack2=Height (or thickness) of conductor in stack 2.
t
stack2
=t
stack1−1 [Equation 26]
tstack1=number of turns in stack 1; and
tstack2=number of turns in stack 2.
Accordingly, the 28 turn design shown in
Accordingly, for the Zig-Zag-Then-Step and -Then-Step-Zig-Zag manufacturing methods, the number of stacks are limited to two. However, for the Double-series-stack-top-to-bottom-bridge, the Reverse-wound-double-series-stack, and the Overhang-knuckle-series-bridge manufacturing methods, it may be possible to have more than two stacks (referred to as a multi-stack transposition winding). However, practical limits to the size of conductors limit the maximum number of turns, as shown by Equations 27, 28 and 29.
w=Width of conductor; and
h=Height (or thickness) of conductor.
w≤10mm [Equation 28]
w=Width of conductor.
h≥0.5mm [Equation 29]
h=Height (or thickness) of conductor.
These limitations may limit the maximum number of turns in a stack. Utilizing the Double-series-stack-top-to-bottom-bridge, the Reverse-wound-double-series-stack, and the Overhang-knuckle-series-bridge manufacturing methods, however, may allow for more than two stacks. These manufacturing methods may be combined with the Odd turns transposition winding method.
For example, for a motor where it is impractical to fit sufficient number of turns into a 2-stack coils, as shown in the example above where a total of 34, 35, or 36 turns may be needed. Utilizing the Double-series-stack-top-to-bottom-bridge, the Reverse-wound-double-series-stack, and the Overhang-knuckle-series-bridge manufacturing method, combined with the odd turns transposition winding method, provides for these coil configurations, shown in
While
As one example implementation of embodiments described herein, a 300 hp synchronous hydro generator may be redesigned from 11000 V to 13800 V, eliminating the need for a step-up transformer. Table 8 provides the original 11000 V generator.
Increasing the output voltage to 13800 V, while maintaining the flux density, requires 35 turns. In this example, an overhang-knuckle-series-bridge manufacturing method is implemented with dispersed main wall insulation, odd turns transposition winding, and multi-stack transposition winding methods to manufacture 35 turns, as shown in Table 9.
Additionally, the cross sectional area may be increased such that the output of the
generator increases to 603.5 hp, 13800 V, as shown in Table 10.
Accordingly, embodiments described herein provide transposition coils and manufacturing methods for transposition coils. Various features and advantages of the aspects described herein are set forth in the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/399,573, filed on Aug. 19, 2022, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63399573 | Aug 2022 | US |