BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the invention generally relate to the application and adaptations to a non-acoustic sensor as alternative microphone means to sense free-field sounds and to be placed on any part of the user's head to obtain high speech intelligibility in noisy environments.
2. Description of the Related Art
It is difficult to obtain high speech-intelligibility/noise immunity in acoustically-noisy environments. High noise immunity is high signal-to-noise ratio where the signal is the user's voice and the noise is the ambient environmental noise. Prior-art inventions that improve noise immunity include employing an array of microphones to sense free-field sounds or/and a non-acoustic sensor such as the accelerometer placed on the boney part (skull, temple or mastoid) or throat of the user's head or in his ear (concha) to sense vibrations, and signal processing. The latter in general yields poor audio quality. In electronic devices, e.g., a smartphone or tablet, the prior-art application of the non-acoustic sensor therein is for ascertaining movement direction and/or navigation.
Put simply, there is no prior-art application of the non-acoustic sensor to sense free-field acoustics (sounds).
Further, there is no prior-art means of adapting the non-acoustic sensor to improve its polar directivity to free-field acoustics.
A commonality of all prior-art noise suppression techniques/apparatus is the employment of one or more prior-art acoustic microphones or an accelerometer to sense vibrations on selected parts of the user's head. Nevertheless, the noise immunity remains insufficient, including insufficient directivity, costs and form factor, complex signal processing, etc. In short, there is a need to ascertain inventions means to obtain better noise immunity and address the aforesaid shortcomings of prior-art inventions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Generally, the invention relates to a transducer apparatus to provide audio sensing with high noise immunity in an acoustically-noisy environment, thereby providing high speech intelligibility. This invention involves replacing the prior-art acoustic microphone with a non-acoustic sensor, including an accelerometer, shock sensor, gyroscope, vibration microphone, or vibration sensor, and the combinations of the non-acoustic sensor(s) with acoustic microphones. The embodiments of the invention is an application of the non-acoustic sensor is to sense vibrations or movement in free-field (not on a surface as prior-art), to improve the polar directivity of the non-acoustic sensor, to employ the non-acoustic sensor with other non-acoustic sensors and acoustic microphone, and to employ non-acoustic sensors in an innovative fashion to sense vibrations on or movement near the skin.
In the first embodiment, the non-acoustic sensor replaces the acoustic microphone to sense free-field acoustics. In the second embodiment, the sensitivity of one side of the non-acoustic sensor is adapted to be different from the other side. In the third embodiment, multiple transducers are adapted to provide higher directivity and/or noise suppression. In the fourth embodiment, the non-acoustic sensor placed within the enclosure of an electronic device or its attachment. There are several adaptations in each of the four embodiments of the invention.
The summary does not describe an exhaustive list of all aspects of the present invention. It is anticipated that the present invention includes all methods, apparatus and systems that can be practiced from all appropriate combinations and permutations of the various aspects in this summary, as well as that delineated below. Such combinations and permutations may have specific advantages not specially described in this summary.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements. It should be noted that references to “an” or “one” embodiment of the invention herein are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and they mean at least one.
FIG. 1A to 1E depicts the definition of the spatial 3-axes for the orientation of a non-acoustic sensor (accelerometer, shock sensor, gyroscope, vibration microphone, vibration sensor) and an acoustic microphone. This includes the front and back directions of these 3-axes.
FIGS. 2A and 2B depicts the polar response plots of prior-art omni-directional and cardioid acoustic microphones.
FIGS. 3A and 3B depicts a prior-art application of an acoustic microphone placed close to the mouth of a user and connected to an electronic device.
FIGS. 4A and 4B depicts the first embodiment of the invention where a non-acoustic sensor is placed close to the mouth of a user and connected to an electronic device.
FIGS. 5A and 5B depicts the polar plots of a single-axis non-acoustic sensor and another whose sensitivity in one direction is less sensitive than the opposite direction.
FIG. 6A to 6F depicts the second embodiment of the invention where various adaptation means are invented to obtain the polar plot of the non-acoustic sensor whose sensitivity in one direction is adapted to be less sensitive than the other opposite direction.
FIG. 7A to 7E depicts the third embodiment of the invention where various adaptation means are invented to combine the functionality of a non-acoustic sensor with other non-acoustic sensors and/or with acoustic microphones.
FIG. 8A to 8D depicts the fourth embodiment of the invention where various adaptation means are invented to sense vibrations arising the user's voice by means of a non-acoustic sensor(s) in the electronic device or its attachment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Numerous specific details are set forth in the following descriptions. It is however understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced with or without these specific details. In other instances, circuits, structures, methods and techniques that are known do not avoid obscuring the understanding of this description. Furthermore, the following embodiments of the invention may be described as a process, which may be described as a flowchart, a flow diagram, a structure diagram, or a block diagram. The operations in the flowchart, flow diagram, structure diagram or block diagram may be a sequential process, parallel or concurrent process, and the order of the operations may be re-arranged. A process may correspond to a technique, methodology, procedure, etc.
FIG. 1(a) depicts established definitions of the axes in three dimensions, x-axis, y-axis and z-axis. FIG. 1 (b) depicts the same with respect to a Non-acoustic Sensor 1 where the subscripts f and b refer to the front and back, respectively, to the surface of Non-acoustic Sensor 1. For sake of definition, 0° azimuth for a given location for the x-axis is opposite direction of xf and 180° azimuth is the opposite direction of xb. Non-acoustic Sensor 1 has Front Surface 2 and Back Surface 3, and as a single-axis non-acoustic sensor, it is sensitive to movement along the x-axis. FIG. 1(c) depicts the same Non-acoustic Sensor 1 from a different view, with Back Surface 3 shaded. FIGS. 1(d) and 1(e) depicts the same as FIGS. 1(b) and 1(c), respectively, for an Acoustic Microphone 10 having Front Surface 11, Back Surface 12 and Acoustic Input Port 13. Also, as before, 0° azimuth for a given location for the x-axis is opposite direction of xf and 180° azimuth is the opposite direction of xb. In prior-art, the non-acoustic sensor is usually an accelerometer.
FIG. 2(a) depicts a typical polar response of a prior-art Acoustic Microphone 10, e.g. FIGS. 1(d) and (e), whose polar response is omni-directional. FIG. 2(b) depicts a typical polar response of a prior-art acoustic microphone whose polar response is directional—cardioid. There are several prior-art different polar responses involving multiple acoustic microphones.
FIG. 3(a) depicts a prior-art application of a single Acoustic Microphone 10 connected to an Electronic Device 20. Acoustic Input Port 13 of Acoustic Microphone 10 is directed to the mouth of the user of Electronic Device 20. By definition of the 3-axes in FIG. 3(a), Acoustic Input Port 13 is 0° azimuth along the x-axis.
FIG. 4(a) depicts the first embodiment of the invention where Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is placed close to the mouth of the user of Electronic Device 20. Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is preferably a single-axis no-acoustic sensor, e.g., an accelerometer, whose internal mass movement is sensitive to the direction perpendicular to the user's mouth, along the x-axis in FIG. 4(b). Front Surface 2 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is placed in front and parallel to the surface of the user's mouth, i.e., 0° azimuth along the x-axis.
Consequent to the appropriate placement of the single-axis Non-acoustic Sensor 1, the polar response of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 as an acoustic transducer that senses sounds is depicted in FIG. 5(a). In FIGS. 5(a) and (b), the 0° and 180° azimuths are respectively the direction along the x-axis that is perpendicular to Front Surface 2 and Back Surface 3 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 in FIG. 4. It can be appreciated that the polar response of Accelerator 1 is very directive—substantially more directive than the prior-art single Acoustic Microphone 10 and prior-art array of acoustic microphones.
Nevertheless, the high sensitivity of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 at 180° azimuth in FIG. 5(a) is undesirable. This is because in this first embodiment of the invention in FIG. 4, the signal most of the voice of the user is at 0° azimuth and most of the noise is present at 180° azimuth, i.e., both voice and noise are sensed. In other words, it desirable that the sensitivity at 180° azimuth be heavily attenuated while the sensitivity at 0° remains unchanged (or accentuated), as depicted in FIG. 5(b).
FIGS. 6 (a)-(f) depict the second embodiment of the invention where various adaptation means are invented to adapt the polar plot of the single-axis Non-acoustic Sensor in FIG. 5(a) to FIG. 5(b)—to obtain high polar directivity, hence noise immunity. Specifically, the four adaptations in FIGS. 6(a)-6(e) serve to reduce the sensitivity of the lobe at the 180° azimuth in FIG. 5(b)—the noise. The fifth adaptation in FIG. 6(f), on the other hand, serves to increase the sensitivity of the lobe at the 0° azimuth in FIG. 5(b)—the signal—and simultaneously reduce the sensitivity of the lobe at the 180° azimuth if the adaptations in FIGS. 6(a)-(e) are applied.
FIG. 6(a) depicts the first invented adaptation of the second embodiment of the invention. Here, Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is encapsulated in Enclosure 100a. Enclosure 100a has Enclosure Front Surface 102a and Enclosure Back Surface 103a. Front Surface 2 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 touches inner surface of Enclosure Front Surface 102a, preferably mechanically adhered thereto. There is an Air Gap 104a (i.e., an empty space) between Back Surface 3 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 and Enclosure Back Surface 103a. As before, Front Surface 2 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 (and Enclosure Front Surface 102a) is placed in front and parallel to the surface of the user's mouth as depicted in FIG. 4. With respect to FIG. 5(a) or 5(b), Front Surface 2 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 (and Enclosure Front Surface 102a) is 0° azimuth and Back Surface 3 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 (and Enclosure Back Surface 103a) is 180° azimuth.
With respect to FIG. 4, the user's voice is at 0° azimuth and the sounds at 180° azimuth are noise in an acoustically noisy environment, along the x-axis. The noise sounds at 180° azimuth are perpendicular to (and strikes) Enclosure Back Surface 103a. Because an air gap now separates Enclosure Back Surface 103a and Back Surface 3 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1, the vibrations (arising from noise) sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1 at 180° azimuth is attenuated. In this fashion, this first adaptation of the second embodiment of the invention in FIG. 6(a) provides for the adaptation of a single-axis Non-acoustic Sensor 1 whose its original polar response in FIG. 5(a) is now adapted to FIG. 5(b). The outcome is the attenuated sensitivity of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 at 180° azimuth, hence an increasingly directive polar response.
FIG. 6(b) depicts the second invented adaptation of the second embodiment of the invention. This second adaptation is similar to the aforesaid first invented adaptation but with a change to the shape of the back of the enclosure. Specifically, the flat surface of Enclosure Back Surface 103a of Enclosure 100a in FIG. 6(a) is now made a curved surface of Enclosure Back Surface 103b of Enclosure 100b in FIG. 6(b). The intention here is reduce the effective surface area that contributes to the sensitivity of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 at 180° azimuth. This would further reduce the sensitivity of the 180° azimuth lobe of the polar plot in FIG. 5(b), hence further accentuating the directivity of the polar response.
It is obvious to one skilled in the art that there are several other adaptations to shape the Enclosure Back Surface 103a and 103b to reduce effective surface area that contributes to the sensitivity of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 at 180° azimuth. An example is to make the Enclosure Back Surface 103a or 103b hemispherical-like or pyramid-like.
FIG. 6(c) depicts the third invented adaptation of the second embodiment of the invention. This third invented adaptation differs from the aforesaid first and second adaptations by removing Air Gap 104a or 104b in Enclosures 100a and 100b in FIGS. 6(a) and 6(b), respectively. Instead Back Surface 3 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 now makes contact with Enclosure Back Surface 103c of Enclosure 100c by means of Feet 105c made from a compliant material, such as rubber. FIG. 6(d) depicts the four different Feet 105c placed on the four corners of Back Surface 3 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1.
In this fashion, only a small portion of the vibrations arising from perpendicular noisy sounds at 180° azimuth that strikes Enclosure Back Surface 103c is transferred to the Back Surface 3 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1. The outcome of this third invented adaptation is the same as the aforesaid first and second invented adaptations—the sensitivity of the 180° azimuth lobe of the polar plot in FIG. 5(b) is attenuated, hence accentuating the directivity of the polar response.
FIG. 6(e) depicts the fourth invented adaptation of the second embodiment of the invention. In this adaptation, instead of having an enclosure with a back surface to attenuate the sounds striking Back Surface 3 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1, a Backing 105e is simply adhered to Back Surface 3 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1. In this fashion, the enclosure that embodies Non-acoustic Sensor 1 need not have a back surface, i.e., it can be an open enclosure with five surfaces with an open back. Backing 105e serves the same function as the Enclosure Back Surfaces 103a, 103b and 103c respectively in Enclosure 100a (FIG. 6(a)), 100b (FIG. 6(b)) and 100c (FIG. 6(c)).
In summary, the four adaptations in FIGS. 6(a)-6(e) serve to reduce the sensitivity of the lobe at the 180° azimuth in FIG. 5(b)—the noise. Consider now the fifth adaptation in FIG. 6(f) which conversely serves to increase the sensitivity of the lobe at the 0° azimuth in FIG. 5(a)—the signal.
In FIG. 6(f), Enclosure 100f has Enclosure Front Surface 102f and Enclosure Back Surface 103f. For sake of illustration, Back Surface 3 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 makes contact to Enclosure Back Surface 103f by means of Feet 105f similar to Feet 105c in FIGS. 6(c) and 6(d).
To increase the sensitivity of the lobe at the 0° azimuth in FIG. 5(b), the effect of the sounds from the user's voice at 0° azimuth (FIG. 4) striking the Top Surface 2 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 needs to be accentuated. This is obtained by a mechanical resonance means, for example a thin film that preferably has compliance in the direction of 0° azimuth and that is placed on the Front Surface 2 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1. In FIG. 6(f), sounds from the user's voice at 0° azimuth strikes this Mechanical Resonance Means 106f via Holes 107f in Enclosure Front Surface 102f. Because of the mechanical resonance, the ensuing mechanical vibrations on the Front Surface 2 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is increased, thereby increasing the sensitivity of the lobe at the 0° azimuth in FIG. 5(b).
Consider now the third embodiment of the invention where the first embodiment of the invention depicted in FIG. 4 is now augmented with other non-acoustic sensor(s) and acoustical microphone transducer(s). For ease of illustration, FIG. 7(a) depicts the reference 3-axes. Note, as before, that the 0° azimuth along the x-axis is perpendicular to the top surface of Non-Acoustic Sensor 1 and pointing to the mouth of the user.
FIG. 7(b) depicts the first invented adaptation of the third embodiment of the invention, involving two non-acoustic sensors. The intention is to obtain high noise immunity by sensing the user's strong voice signal and weak noise signal at 0° azimuth from a first non-acoustic sensor, and sensing the strong noise signal and the user's weak voice signal at 180° azimuth from a second non-acoustic sensor. This is obtained by spatially placing the two non-acoustic sensors differently and orienting them according their directivity, preferably with the adaptions in FIGS. 6(a)-(f). Further noise immunity can be obtained by signal processing, largely by cancelling the weak noise signal sensed by the first non-acoustic sensor from the strong noise signal obtained from the second non-acoustic sensor.
In FIG. 7(b), the first and second single-axis non-acoustic sensors are respectively Non-acoustic Sensor 1 and Non-acoustic Sensor 1a. Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is arranged such that its Top Surface 2 is placed close to and in parallel to (in front of) the user's mouth, i.e., at 0° azimuth in FIG. 7(a) and FIG. 5(a). Back Surface 3 of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is then at 180° azimuth, i.e., facing away from the user's mouth. Non-acoustic Sensor 1b is arranged such that Top Surface 2a is conversely at 180° azimuth, and its Bottom Surface 3a is at 0° azimuth.
The outputs of Non-acoustic Sensors 1 and 1a are connected to Electronic Device 20, for example a smartphone. In an example of a smartphone assembly, Non-acoustic Sensor 1 may be placed at the bottom of the smartphone with Top Surface 2 placed parallel or at 45° to its screen side (top side); see FIG. 8(a) later for a parallel placement. Non-acoustic Sensor 1a, on the other hand, may be placed on the top of the smartphone with Top Surface 2a placed parallel or at 45° to the back surface of the smartphone.
The acoustical signal sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is mostly the user's voice from 0° azimuth and some noise at 180° azimuth. This is because Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is placed close to the user's mouth. The high directivity from Non-acoustic Sensor 1 provides some noise immunity. The acoustical signal sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1a, on the other hand, is mostly noise from 180° azimuth and some voice because it is relatively far from the user's mouth. By means of signal processing in Electronic Device 20 where some noise sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is cancelled by the mostly noise sensed from Non-acoustic Sensor 1a, high noise immunity is obtained.
In a slightly modified first adaptation of the third embodiment of the invention, the noise sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1 at 180° azimuth can be reduced by one or more of the invented adaptations of the second embodiment of the invention depicted in FIGS. 6(a)-6(f). In this fashion, the acoustical signal sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is mostly the user's voice from 0° azimuth and very little noise at 180° azimuth—the noise is much smaller than in the aforesaid first adaptation of the third embodiment of the invention. By the same means, the acoustical signal sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1a, conversely, is mostly noise from 180° azimuth and very little voice from 0° azimuth. Higher noise immunity can be obtained by signal processing, where the very little noise sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is cancelled by the mostly noise sensed from Non-acoustic Sensor 1a.
FIG. 7(c) depicts the second adaptation of the third embodiment of the invention involving three single-axis non-acoustic sensors, Non-acoustic Sensor 1, Non-acoustic Sensor 1b and Non-acoustic Sensor 1c. The intention of this adaptation is to suppress noise in the direction of the two axes perpendicular to the axis of the user's voice. For example, with respect to orientations defined in FIG. 7(a), the voice is along the x-axis while the noise is in the y- and z-axes. One single-axis non-acoustic sensor is used for each axis.
Non-acoustic Sensor 1, Non-acoustic Sensor 1b and Non-acoustic Sensor 1c respectively senses signals along the x-axis, z-axis and y-axis. As the user's voice is at 0° azimuth in front of Front Surface 2 and noise at 180° azimuth of the x-axis, Non-acoustic Sensor 1 senses both voice and noise—see FIG. 5(a). Non-acoustic Sensor 1b, with its Front Surface 2b and Back Surface 3b oriented to the z-axis, senses mostly noise along the z-axis. Non-acoustic Sensor 1c, with its Front Surface 2c and Back Surface 3c oriented to they-axis, senses mostly noise along they-axis.
The outputs of the three non-acoustic sensors are connected to electronic device 20. The signal processing involves cancelling/reducing the noise in the signals from Non-acoustic Sensor 1 from the noise signals obtained from Non-acoustic Sensors 1b and 1c, hence high noise immunity.
Note that it may not be necessary to use three independent single-axis non-acoustic sensors in this second adaptation of the third embodiment of the invention. Instead, one 3-axes non-acoustic sensor that is sensitive to three independent axes may be used.
In a slightly modified second adaptation of the third embodiment of the invention, the noise sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1 at 180° azimuth can be reduced by one or more of the invented adaptations of the second embodiment of the invention depicted in FIG. 6(a)-6(f). By this means, the signal sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is mostly voice at 0° azimuth with a small amount of noise at 180° azimuth along the x-axis, and Non-acoustic Sensors 1b and 1c sensing mostly noise.
FIG. 7(d) depicts a further slightly modified second adaptation of the third embodiment of the invention. In this further slightly modified adaptation, a fourth non-acoustic sensor, Non-acoustic Sensor 1a, is augmented to the three single-axis non-acoustic sensors, Non-acoustic Sensor 1, Non-acoustic Sensor 1b and Non-acoustic Sensor 1c in FIG. 7(c). This fourth non-acoustic sensor, Non-acoustic Sensor 1a, is the same Non-acoustic Sensor 1a in FIG. 7(b) and serves the same function—the first invented adaptation of the third embodiment of the invention. Specifically, in the x-axis, Non-acoustic Sensor 1a being further away from the user's mouth, it senses much more noise than Non-acoustic Sensor 1, and this much more noise signal from Non-acoustic Sensor 1a is used to cancel the noise sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1. This cancellation is obtained by signal processing in Electronic Device 20. To further accentuate further slightly modified second adaptation, the invented adaptations in FIGS. 6(a)-6(f) may be adopted for Non-acoustic Sensor 1 and Non-acoustic Sensor 1a.
FIG. 7(e) depicts the third adaptation of the third embodiment of the invention involving one single-axis non-acoustic sensor, Non-acoustic Sensor 1, and four acoustic microphones, Acoustic Microphone 10, Acoustic Microphone 10a, Acoustic Microphone 10b and Acoustic Microphone 10c. Note that in many contemporary smartphones, there are 3-4 acoustical microphones therein and they are often used for noise immunity based on prior-art techniques such as beamforming, noise reduction algorithms, etc., and often take advantage of their spatial locations. An example of this spatial location is the position of Acoustic Microphone 10 placed close to the mouth of the user and Acoustic Microphone 10a that is placed relatively far away from the mouth. These spatial positions are obtained by placements at various parts of the smartphone; see FIG. 8(a) later.
In this third adaptation of the third embodiment of the invention, the signal sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is mostly the user's voice at 0° azimuth and some noise at 180° azimuth along the x-axis (FIG. 7(a)). The ratio of the user's voice signal over noise sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1 would be much higher than that sensed by Acoustic Microphone 10 as Acoustic Microphone 10 is omni-directional (FIG. 2(a)) or slightly directional (FIG. 2(b)). Because of this improved signal-to-noise ratio obtained from Non-acoustic Sensor 1 over Acoustic Microphone 10, the signal processing in Electronic Device 20 would be able to provide improved noise immunity over the prior-art multiple-microphone system in contemporary smartphones.
A modified third adaptation of the third embodiment would be to employ one or more of the invented adaptations in second embodiment of the invention to Non-acoustic Sensor 1, i.e., one or more adaptations in FIG. 6(a)-(f). In this fashion, the noise sensed by Non-acoustic Sensor 1 at 180° azimuth is reduced.
Consider now the fourth embodiment of the invention where the Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is embodied in an electronic device or its attachment. In FIG. 8(a)-(d), Electronic Device 200 is preferably a smartphone or tablet that can be used for communications as a smartphone.
Contemporary electronic devices have several acoustic microphones, typically two or more, located at different locations within its enclosure. In the example of Electronic Device 200 depicted in FIG. 8(a), there are four acoustic microphones—Acoustic Microphone 202a in Acoustic Port 201a, Acoustic Microphone 202b in Acoustic Port 201b, Acoustic Microphone 202c in Earspeaker Port 201c, and Acoustic Microphone 202d in the back surface of Electronic Device 200.
In the first invented adaptation of the fourth embodiment of the invention, Electronic Device 200 in FIG. 8(a) further embodies Non-acoustic Sensor 1.
In contemporary electronic devices, this non-acoustic sensor is an accelerometer and not used for acoustic applications—it is used for ascertaining the orientation of the electronic device, movement and for navigational purposes. The various acoustic microphones are typically used for noise immunity in noisy environments, for example Acoustic Microphones 202a and 202b may be used for beamforming towards the mouth of the noise, and Acoustic Microphones 202c and 202d used for sensing mostly noise. A signal processor in contemporary electronic devices sample the output of these different microphones for acoustic noise cancellation, hence noise immunity.
In this first invented adaptation of the fourth embodiment of the invention, when Electronic Device 1 is used normally, it is oriented such that Earspeaker Port 201c is placed on, touches or pressed against on the pinna of the user, and Acoustic Microphone 202a (and Acoustic Microphone 202b, if present) is oriented to be close to the mouth of the user.
Unlike contemporary electronic devices where the non-acoustic sensor is not used for acoustic purposes, this invention conversely employs Non-acoustic Sensor 1 for acoustic purposes. Particularly, in this invention, it is applied to sense free-field vibrations or movement arising from the user's voice—as that described in the first embodiment of the invention in FIG. 4. To improve the directivity of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 towards the mouth of the speaker as depicted in FIG. 5(b) where the 0° azimuth is the direction towards the mouth, the various invented adaptations of the second embodiment of the invention depicted in FIG. 6(a)-(f) are applicable.
This second adaption of the fourth invention includes multiple Non-acoustic Sensors 1 similar to that described in the various adaptions of the third embodiments of the invention depicted in FIGS. 7(b)-(d). In this case where Electronic Device 1 is used normally, the other Non-acoustic Sensors 1a, 1b and 1c in FIG. 7(b)-(d) spatially placed at different parts of Electronic Device 1 are usually used to primarily sense noise while Non-acoustic Sensor 1 in FIG. 8(a) senses primarily voice and some noise. The signal processor in Electronic Device 1 processes two or more of the various outputs of these non-acoustic sensors, possibly including one or more acoustic microphones in Electronic Device 1, to obtain high noise immunity.
In some situations, one or more Non-acoustic Sensors 1a, 1b and 1c in FIG. 7(b)-(d) spatially placed at different parts of Electronic Device 1 can be used to conversely sense both voice and noise. For example, consider the case where Non-acoustic sensor 2a in FIG. 7(b) is placed in Earspeaker Port 201c in FIG. 8(a) and oriented or arranged to be sensitive to vibrations on or movement near the surface of Earspeaker Port 201c—note that this orientation is the same as Non-acoustic Sensor 1 and opposite to Non-acoustic sensor 1a depicted in FIG. 7(b). In a noisy environment, the user usually pushes Electronic Device 1 against his head, particularly pushing Earspeaker Port 201c in FIG. 8(a) against his pinna. In this fashion, Non-acoustic sensor 2a placed in Earspeaker Port 201c of Electronic Device 1 (not shown) can now sense vibrations on or movement around the user's head, including on the skin of the user's pinna, where the vibrations or movement resemble or arising from the user's voice.
FIG. 8(b) depicts the invented third adaptation of the fourth embodiment of the invention where Attachment 300 may be attached to Electronic Device 200 by means of Male Plug Connector 203m in Attachment 300 inserted into Female Socket Connector 203f in Electronic Device 200. In contemporary electronic devices, these connectors are typically the Micro-USB, USB-C or lightning connectors. In this third adaption, Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is now placed in the enclosure of Attachment 300. The function of Non-acoustic Sensor 1 in Attachment 300 in FIG. 8(b) is the same as Non-acoustic Sensor 1 in FIG. 8(a).
FIG. 8(c) depicts the invented fourth adaptation of the fourth embodiment of the invention where Attachment 300 now has Arm 304 that may be swung from a pivot. In this adaptation, Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is placed in Arm 304. In non-noisy environments, Arm 304 may be pushed into Cavity 305. In noisy environments, Arm 304 is swung open such that Non-acoustic Sensor 1 is now arranged to be placed closer to the mouth of the user to sense free-field vibrations or movements near the user's mouth. If Arm 304 is swung sufficiently, Non-acoustic Sensor 1 may now touch or press against the skin of the user—the region is close to the user's mouth. Non-acoustic Sensor 1 now senses the vibrations or movement on the skin surface close to the user's mouth.
FIG. 8(d) depicts the invented fifth adaptation of the fourth embodiment of the invention. In this adaption, Arm 304 and cavity 305 in FIG. 8(c) is now respectively Arm 204 and Cavity 205. Arm 204 and Cavity 205 are within the enclosure of Electronic Device 200, and they respectively serve the same function as Arm 304 and cavity 305 in FIG. 8(c).
The aforesaid descriptions are merely illustrative of the principles of this invention and many configurations, variations, and various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The foresaid embodiments may be designed, realized and implemented individually or in any combination or permutations.
PATENT CITATIONS
|
Publication
|
Cited Patent
Filing Date
Date
Applicant
Title
|
|
U.S. Pat. No. 4,607,383
Aug. 18, 1983
19 Aug. 1986
Robert Ingalls
Throat microphone
|
U.S. Pat. No. 3,787,641
5 Jun. 1972
22 Jan. 1974
Santori C
Bone conduction
|
microphone assembly
|
US 20050244020
1 Sep. 2003
3 Nov. 2005
Yoshitaka
Microphone and
|
A1
Nakajima,
communication interface
|
Makoto
system
|
Shozakai
|
US 20100172519
8 Dec. 2009
8 Jul. 2010
Tominori
Bone-conduction
|
A1
Kimura
microphone built-in headset
|
U.S. Pat. No. 5,282,253
26 Feb. 1991
25 Jan. 1994
Masao Konomi
Bone conduction
|
microphone mount
|
U.S. Pat. No. 9,363,596
15 Mar. 2013
7 Jun. 2016
Sorin V Dusan,
System and method of
|
Aram Lindahl,
mixing accelerometer and
|
Esge B.
microphone signals to
|
Anderson
improve voice quality in a
|
mobile device
|
|
Patent Application
20210314700
