The present invention relates generally to a method of implanting a phrenic nerve stimulation lead system and a related phrenic nerve stimulation lead for use with an implanted pulse generator (IPG) for treating a breathing disorder.
Many patients with breathing disorders such as central sleep apnea (CSA) display periods of rapid respiration followed by a relatively long compensatory pause in respiration. The clinical manifestation of the disorder is a period of shallow rapid breathing followed by frank apnea or hypopnea. This pattern repeats episodically and is called Cheyne Stokes Respiration (CSR). Several treatment regimes have been proposed to alleviate CSR, including a technique presented in detail in the utility application incorporated by reference.
Historically, the ability to control respiration via phrenic nerve stimulation is widely known and well reported in the literature. Early work shows the use of phrenic nerve stimulation to treat paralyzed patients to initiate and support respiration. A substantial body of animal research discloses the basic mechanisms for respiration control though stimulation of the phrenic nerve.
Although phrenic nerve stimulation is known in the art there is a continuing need to improve the “leads” devices for accessing and electrically stimulating the phrenic nerve. And there is a continuing need to improve the stimulation methodology.
The phrenic nerve stimulation lead device has a flexible elongate lead body with a proximal connector and a distal tip. In use the lead is permanently implanted in a vein near one portion of the phrenic nerve. The lead has physical features and properties important for successful transvenous deployment and stimulation of the phrenic nerve from the left pericardiophrenic vein.
The stimulation lead has a distal tip tapered into a “rats tail”. The presence of this extended tapered section will serve to orient and stabilize the lead and the electrodes in the vessel by restricting movement of the lead with respect to the vessel. The additional surface area of the lead provides additional friction and ensures that the vessel and lead do not move relative to each other. One or more and preferably two electrode sites are placed proximal of this distal tip. Each electrode is typically formed as a ring and individually electrically coupled to the proximal connector by internal conductors within the lead.
In one embodiment a guidewire lumen is carried entirely through the lead body and the lumen is concentric with the distal tip at the distal tip. In an alternate embodiment the lead is stiffened by a removable stylet that is inserted into the lead into a stylet lumen.
An optional mechanical stop feature may be included within the lead body to intercept and interact with a finishing guide wire to stabilize the lead during placement.
The lead is acutely repositionable but anticipated foreign-body response will render it permanent in the vessel. The lead may have steroid eluting features to regulate this physiologic process.
The shape of the lead body includes two or more curves, bends or loops near the distal end of the lead. These curves in the lead body lie in two planes and direct the tip at an angle. These features stabilize the lead in a large companion vessel while biasing the distal “rats tail” into a stable position in the smaller target vessel.
The preferred implantation process requires a percutaneous puncture to access the subclavian vein. The implanted pulse generator (IPG) will be implanted in a subcutaneous pocket nearby. A guide catheter having a shaped tip is navigated along the subclavian vein using a guidewire. The catheter and wire pass through the brachiocephalic vein in to the ostium of the left pericardiophrenic vein. Normal contrast venography techniques are used to illuminate and access this location. The guidewire is inserted several centimeters into the left pericardiophrenic vein and the mouth of the guide catheter is passed into the ostium of the left pericardiophrenic vein. Next the stimulation lead is delivered to a target location through the guide catheter over the guidewire alone or with the use of a stylet. When the electrodes are well positioned near the phrenic nerve target location the stylet or guidewire is removed and the optional stabilizing or finishing guidewire wire is exchanged and inserted into the lead body. Relative traction between the finishing guide wire and the guide sheath allows for the smooth removal of the guide catheter without dislodging the lead. In essence the “rats tail” remains biased and stationary in the left pericardiophrenic vein as the lead “relaxes” and assumes its natural low mechanical energy state while the guide catheter is removed. Withdrawal of the finishing wire if used or the guidewire or stylet activates the complementary shaped curves of the lead. As the curves bend and unfurl into contact with the larger brachiocephalic vein the most distal tip of the of the lead in the smaller vessel becomes stabilized. Next the proximal connector of the lead is coupled to the IPG. The IPG provides stimulation that completes the implantation method and the method of therapy.
Identical reference numerals indicate identical features throughout the figures of the drawing, wherein:
Stimulation Regime
The applicant has incorporated a utility patent reference that discloses in detail a medical device (IPG) that can detect and treat CSR and other forms of breathing disorders by the transvenous electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve.
For purposes of this disclosure it is sufficient to understand that the disclosed technique uses electrical stimulation of one phrenic nerve to arrest or still the motion of one hemidiaphragm of the patient. This process lowers the observed breathing rate post therapy and over time drives the blood gases to an improved state of oxygen saturation and carbon dioxide elimination.
The implanted pulse generator (IPG) 12 has the ability to detect the respiration process in real time. Preferably impedance plesthysmography is used to detect both the rate of respiration and the turning points within a single breath. It is anticipated that the companion IPG 12 includes an impedance plethysmograph that emits minute electrical pulses between electrodes on a measurement lead system (not shown in the present figures). These impedance signals are used to measure the volume of the lung and rate of change of volume of the lung.
The phrenic nerve stimulation therapy is provided after the start of a breath but before the natural end of the breath. The magnitude of the stimulation is sufficient to arrest the motion of the diaphragm. By essentially stopping the breathing for a moment the overall duration of the breath is extended. This breath hold process lowers the observed rate of breathing of at least one lung.
This stimulation therapy may be supplied to each breath for a series of breaths or on a less frequent basis. The stimulation may be supplied in response to a detected episode of CSR or it may be provided to prevent progression to CSR. For example, stimulation may be initiated upon the detected occurrence of CSR. Alternatively an activity sensor may report that the patient is supine and at rest and this set of criteria may be necessary and sufficient to invoke therapeutic stimulation. Regardless of the specific intervention criteria, the IPG will delivery the appropriate amount of energy to still the breath, via the transvenous stimulation lead.
System Architecture
In summary after implantation the lead 10 system delivers electrical stimulation to the phrenic nerve to arrest diaphragm 26 motion by the delivery of electrical energy after the onset of inspiration indicated by motion arrow 32 in the figure and the electrical energy delivered is sufficient to pause that diaphragm motion. In this fashion the lead 10 system and the IPG 12 are used for stimulating the phrenic nerve 24 of a patient to treat defects in respiration.
Stimulation Lead
Next, an intermediate shaped segment is shown at numeral 60. The shaped segment includes two or more bends or loops or curves. The bend curve 48 lies in the XZ plane in the figure. The bend curve 46 rises out of the XZ plane in the Y direction. Preferably the axis of the distal segment 50 makes an included angle of about 15 degrees with respect to the XZ plane.
The most proximal segment includes a connector pin assembly 52 that allows conductors within the lead to communicate with the two electrodes. For clarity the conductors are not shown. The construction of the conductors is well known in this art and need not be shown in detail. Preferably and overall the elongate portion 54 of the shaped segment 60 and the distal segment 50 are not coplanar and the major axis of the elongate portion 54 and major axis of the distal segment 50 are not coaxial. These geometric constraints place the elongate segment 54 and the distal segment 50 in separate planes and the major axes of these sections of the lead are not collinear.
The lead may also have a through lumen to accept a guide wire 56 as depicted in the figure passing into the connector 52 pin and traveling beyond the distal tip and emerging at reference numeral 56. As an alternative, a stylet lumen may be located within the lead to permit the use of a stylet to stiffen the lead. It may also be desirable to have a mechanical stop in the stylet or guide wire lumen to accept a “finishing wire”. This optional finishing wire can be used to supply a force to the lead to keep it in position as the guide catheter is removed. In general the finishing wire is of slightly larger diameter and it bottoms out at a location near but still proximal of the electrode and shaped segments of the lead. Pulling on the guide catheter while pushing on the finishing wire at the same time prevents the lead to guide catheter friction from dislodging or moving the electrodes from their preferred location.
Method of Implantation
Lead Interactions
Turning to
Steroid eluting features may be provided on portions of the lead system to reduce inflammation associated with the placement of the leads. Other coatings maybe used to enhance or reduce friction to help stabilize the lead.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/150,654 filed Apr. 30, 2008 titled “Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation System,” now U.S. Pat. No. 10,406,366, which claims the benefit of and incorporates by reference U.S. Provisional Application 60/926,910 filed Apr. 30, 2007 titled “Leads for Transvenous Phrenic Stimulation.” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/150,654 also claims the benefit of and incorporates by reference and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/601,150 filed Nov. 17, 2006 titled “System and Method to Modulate Phrenic Nerve to Prevent Sleep Apnea,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,244,359, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/737,808 filed Nov. 18, 2005 titled “System and Method to Modulate Phrenic Nerve to Prevent Sleep Apnea,” U.S. Provisional Application 60/743,062 filed Dec. 21, 2005 titled “System and Method to Modulate Phrenic Nerve to Prevent Sleep Apnea,” and U.S. Provisional Application 60/743,326 filed Feb. 21, 2006 titled “System and Method to Modulate Phrenic Nerve to Prevent Sleep Apnea.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4129125 | Lester et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4169479 | Muto | Oct 1979 | A |
4827935 | Geddes et al. | May 1989 | A |
4830008 | Meer | May 1989 | A |
5056519 | Vince | Oct 1991 | A |
5146918 | Kallok et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5170802 | Mehra | Dec 1992 | A |
5174287 | Kallok et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5184621 | Vogel et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5211173 | Kallok et al. | May 1993 | A |
5265604 | Vince | Nov 1993 | A |
5483969 | Testerman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485851 | Erickson | Jan 1996 | A |
5531781 | Alferness et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
6006134 | Hill et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6132384 | Christopherson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6212435 | Lattner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266564 | Hill et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6301507 | Bakels | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6360740 | Ward et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6415183 | Scheiner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449507 | Hill et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456863 | Levin et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463327 | Lurie et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6532388 | Hill et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537228 | Lambert | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542774 | Hill et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6587726 | Lurie et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589188 | Street et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6641542 | Cho et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6684101 | Daum | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6714823 | De Lurgio et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718208 | Hill et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
RE38705 | Hill et al. | Feb 2005 | E |
6881192 | Park | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6890306 | Poezevera | May 2005 | B2 |
6928324 | Park et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934583 | Weinberg et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937903 | Schuler et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6964641 | Cho et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7025730 | Cho et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7070568 | Koh | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7077132 | Berthon-Jones | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082331 | Park et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7094207 | Koh | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7155278 | King et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7179229 | Koh | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7184829 | Hill et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7200442 | Koh et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7212862 | Park et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223244 | Koh | May 2007 | B1 |
7225019 | Jahns et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225021 | Park et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7245971 | Park et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7269457 | Shafer et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7269459 | Koh | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7277757 | Casavant et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7340302 | Falkenberg et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7357775 | Koh | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7361146 | Bharmi et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7363086 | Koh et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7371220 | Koh et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7628801 | Westlund et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647115 | Levin et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7747323 | Libbus et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7787946 | Stahmann et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8086314 | Kieval | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8131372 | Levin et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8200336 | Tehrani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8244359 | Gelfand et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255056 | Tehrani | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8280513 | Tehrani et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290595 | Kieval et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8348941 | Tehrani | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8463401 | Jones et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
10406366 | Westlund et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10518090 | Gelfand et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
20010003799 | Boveja | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020165535 | Lesh et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020165536 | Kelley | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030050681 | Pianca | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030195571 | Burnes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040088015 | Casavant et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050043765 | Williams et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050061320 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085734 | Tehrani | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085865 | Tehrani | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085866 | Tehrani | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085867 | Tehrani et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085868 | Tehrani et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085869 | Tehrani et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050165457 | Benser et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050197588 | Freeberg | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240240 | Park et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050288729 | Libbus et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288759 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030894 | Tehrani | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036294 | Tehrani | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041277 | Deem | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041295 | Osypka | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060084060 | Nagahama et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122662 | Tehrani et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142815 | Tehrani et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149334 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155341 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167523 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060229677 | Moffitt | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247729 | Tehrani et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060247750 | Seifert et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070021795 | Tehrani | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070118183 | Gelfand et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129643 | Kwok et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070260285 | Libbus et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282376 | Shuros | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080154330 | Tehrani et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161878 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167695 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177347 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183239 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183240 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183264 | Bly et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188903 | Tehrani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188904 | Tehrani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090036947 | Westlund et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20130165989 | Gelfand et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20160001072 | Gelfand et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20220176119 | Gelfand et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1588735 | Oct 2005 | EP |
2371416 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2008092246 | Aug 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Javaheri, Shahrokh, MD, CPAP Should Not be Used for Central Sleep Apnea in Congestive Heart Failure Patients, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, vol. 2. No. 4, 2006. |
Shaul, Donald B., et al., Thoracoscopic Placement of Phrenic Nerve Electrodes for Diaphragmatic Pacing in Children, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 974-978, 2002. |
Office Action from corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,865,410, dated Feb. 3, 2021. |
Redline, Susan et al., Beyond the Fat Boy, Journal of Applied Physiology 2005, vol. 99: pp. 1243-1244. |
Esler, Murray et al., Is Obstructive Sleep Apnea the Cause of Sympathetic Nervous Activation in Human Obesity?, Journal of Applied Physiology 2006, vol. 100, pp. 11-12. |
Caples, Sean M. et al., Influence of Cardiac Function and Failure on Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Journal of Applied Physiology 2005, vol. 99, pp. 2433-2439. |
Punjabi, Naresh M. et al., Disorders of Glucose Metabolism in Sleep Apnea, Journal of Applied Physiology 2005, vol. 99, pp. 1998-2007. |
Leuenberger, Ursa. et al., Hypoxia Augments Apnea-Induced Peripheral Vasoconstriction in Humans, Journal of Applied Physiology 2001, vol. 90, pp. 1516-1522. |
Oliven, Arie, et al., Upper Airway Response to Electrical Stimulation of the Genioglossus in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Journal of Applied Physiology 2003, vol. 95, pp. 2023-2029. |
Parati, Gianfranco et al., Sleep Apnea: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Relation to Cardiovascular Risk, Am Journal Physiological Society 2007, vol. 293, pp. R1671-R1683. |
Gottfried, Stewart B. et al., Effects of Phrenic Stimulation on Upper Airway Resistance in Anesthetized Dogs, Am Physiological Society 1983, 0161-7567/83, pp. 419-426. |
Planas, Roque F. et al., Diaphragmatic Pressures: Transvenous vs. Direct Phrenic Nerve Stimulation, Am Physiological Society 1985, 0161-7567/85, pp. 269-273. |
Series, F. et al., Site of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation-Induced Upper Airway Collapse: Influence of Expiratory Time, Journal of Applied Physiology 2002, vol. 92, pp. 665-671. |
Kingma, John G. Jr. et al., Neuromodulation Therapy Does Not Influence Blood Flow Distribution or Left-Ventricular Dynamics During Acute Myocardial Ischemia, Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical 91 (2001) pp. 47-54. |
Linderoth, Bengt, MD, PHD et al., Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Syndromes: Role of Animal Models, American Academy of Pain Medicine, vol. 7, No. S14-S26, 2006. |
Tanaka, Satoshi et al., Mechanisms of Sustained Cutaneous Vasodilation Induced by Spinal Cord Stimulation, Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical114 (2004) pp. 55-60. |
Lorenzi-Filho, Geraldo et al., Cheyne-Stokes Respiration in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Causes and Consequences, Clinics 2005; 60(4):333-44. |
Brack, Thomas, Cheyne-Stokes Respiration in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure, Swiss Med Wkly 2003; 133:605-610, www.smw.ch. |
Yumino, Dai et al., Central Sleep Apnea and Cheyne-Stokes Respiration, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 2008, vol. 5, pp. 226-236. |
Garrido-Garcia, H. et al., Treatment of Chronic Ventilatory Failure Using a Diaphragmatic Pacemaker, Spinal Cord (1998) 36, 310-314. |
Diedrichs, Holger et al., Symptomatic Relief Precedes Improvement of Myocardial Blood Flow in Patients Under Spinal Goard Stimulation, BioMed Central, 2005, pp. 1-7. |
Kaneko, S. et al., A New Approach to Respiratory Assist for Phrenic Nerve Paralysis, Trans Am Soc. Artif Intern Organs, 1985, vol. XXXI, pp. 301-304. |
MacIntyre, Neil R., MD, Setting the Frequency-Tidal Volume Pattern, www.rcjournal.com/contents/03.02/03.02.0266.asp. |
Kohnlein, T. et al., Central Sleep Apnoea Syndrome in Patients with Chronic Heart Disease: A Critical Review of the Current Literature, Thorax 2002; 57:547-554. |
Javaheri, Shahrokh, MD, Central Sleep Apnea in Congestive Heart Failure: Prevalence, Mechanisms, Impact, and Therapeutic Options, Seminars in Respiratory and Critcal Care Medicine, 2005, vol. 26, No. 1. |
Dobelle, William H., Use of Breathing Pacemakers to Suppress Intractable Hiccups of up to Thirteen Years Duration, ASAIO Journal1999, pp. 524-525. |
Series, Frederic, Assessment of Upper Airway Dynamics in Awake Patients with Sleep Apnea Using Phrenic Nerve Stimulation, Am Journal Respir Crit Care Med, 2000, vol. 162., pp. 795-800. |
Bilgutay, A.M. et al., Augmented Ventilation by Synchronous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation, Trans. Amer. Soc. Artif. Int. Organs, 1970, vol. XVI, pp. 213-217. |
Yasuma, Fumihiko et al., Eight-Year Follow-Up Study of a Patient with Central Alveolar Hypoventilation Treated with Diaphragm Pacing, Respiration, 1998; 65:313-316. |
Handa, Y. et al., Basic Studies on Electrophrenic Respiration Part 2—Assisted Ventilation by the Synchronous Electrophrenic Respirator, Medical and Biological Engineering, Jul. 1976. |
Kimura, M. et al., A Heart-Rate-Responsive Diaphragm Pacemaker, Med. & Biol. Eng. & Comput., 1987, 25, 458-462. |
Kimura, M. et al., Heart Rate and Body Temperature Sensitive Diaphragm Pacing, Med. & Bioi. Eng. & Comput. 1992,30, 155-161. |
Kimura, M. et al., Addition to an RF-Coupled Phrenic Nerve Stimulator Implant to Provide Outward Transmission of Body Temperature, Med. & Bioi. Eng. & Comput. 1986, 24, 659-661. |
Taira, Takaomi, MD, Ph.D et al., Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Diaphragm Pacing with a Spinal Cord Stimulator, Elsevier Science, Surg Neural, 2003; 59:128-32. |
Chatfield, Paul 0. et al., Role of Pulmonary Proprioceptive Reflexes in Suppression of Spontaneous Breathing During Electrophrenic Respiration, Dept. of Physiology, Harvard Medical School, and Dept. of Physiology, Harvard School of Public Health, vol. 163. |
Sarnoff, Stanley J. et al., Electrophrenic Respiration. III. Mechanism of the Inhibition of Spontaneous Respiration, Dept. of Physiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 1948, vol. 155, pp. 203-207. |
Sarnoff, Stanley J. et al., Electrophrenic Respiration IV. The Effectiveness of Contralateral Ventilation During Activity of One Phrenic Nerve, Dept. of Physiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 1949, pp. 929-937. |
Stemmer, Edward A. MD et al., Diaphragmatic Pacing in the Treatment of Hypoventilation Syndrome, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 54, No. 5, 1967, pp. 649-657. |
Furman, Seymour, MD et al., Transvenous Stimulation of the Phrenic Nerves, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 62, No. 5, 1971, pp. 743-751. |
Aiyar, Harish et al., Diaphragm Pacing for Chronic Respiratory Insufficient, CRC Press, LLC, 2001, Chapter 9. |
International Search Report of international application PCT/US2006/044788 (Aug. 15, 2007). 3 pp. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority of international application PCT/US2006/044788 (Apr. 12, 2007). 3 pp. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of international application PCT/US2006/044788 (May 20, 2008). 4 pp. |
Prosecution History for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/538,713 including: Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due mailed Aug. 19, 2019, Final Rejection mailed May 15, 2019, Non-Final Rejection mailed Nov. 2, 2018, Final Rejection mailed Aug. 9, 2017, Non-Final Rejection mailed Nov. 9, 2016, Final Rejection mailed Jan. 15, 2016, Non-Final Rejection mailed Apr. 14, 2015, Final Rejection mailed Apr. 21, 2014; and Non-Final Rejection mailed Jun. 19, 2013. |
Prosecution History for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/601,150 including: Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due mailed Jun. 4, 2012, Final Rejection mailed Jun. 8, 2010, Non-Final Rejection mailed Aug. 20, 2009; and Requirement for Restriction/Election mailed Mar. 23, 2009. |
Prosecution History for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,128 including: Advisory Action mailed Feb. 19, 2021, Final Rejection mailed Dec. 9, 2020, Non-Final Rejection mailed Jun. 5, 2020, Advisory Action mailed Mar. 3, 2020, Final Rejection mailed Nov. 14, 2019, Non-Final Rejection mailed Jun. 26, 2019, Advisory Action mailed May 21, 2019, Final Rejection mailed Jan. 23, 2019, Non-Final Rejection mailed Mar. 12, 2018; and Requirement for Restriction/Election mailed May 2, 2017. |
Prosecution History for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,654 including: Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due mailed Apr. 30, 2019, Non-Final Rejection mailed Apr. 6, 2018, Final Rejection mailed Mar. 2, 2017, Non-Final Rejection mailed May 5, 2016, Final Rejection mailed Jul. 30, 2013, Non-Final Rejection mailed Oct. 11, 2012, Non-Final Rejection mailed Dec. 19, 2011; and Requirement for Restriction/Election mailed May 16, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190351229 A1 | Nov 2019 | US | |
20220212005 A9 | Jul 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60926910 | Apr 2007 | US | |
60743326 | Feb 2006 | US | |
60743062 | Dec 2005 | US | |
60737808 | Nov 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12150654 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 16525060 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11601150 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 12150654 | US |