This application is a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/414,769 filed on Nov. 17, 2010 and entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS HAVING SEGMENTED STATOR LAMINATIONS.”
This application is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/414,774 filed on Nov. 17, 2010 and entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM COIL CONCEPTS.”
This application is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/414,781 filed on Nov. 17, 2010 and entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS HAVING LAMINATED AND POWDERED METAL PORTIONS.”
This application is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/453,075 filed on Mar. 15, 2011 and entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS HAVING LAMINATED AND POWDERED METAL PORTIONS.” The entire contents of all the foregoing applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present disclosure relates to electrical systems, and in particular to transverse flux machines and commutated flux machines.
Motors and alternators are typically designed for high efficiency, high power density, and low cost. High power density in a motor or alternator may be achieved by operating at high rotational speed and therefore high electrical frequency. However, many applications require lower rotational speeds. A common solution to this is to use a gear reduction. Gear reduction reduces efficiency, adds complexity, adds weight, and adds space requirements. Additionally, gear reduction increases system costs and increases mechanical failure rates.
Additionally, if a high rotational speed is not desired, and gear reduction is undesirable, then a motor or alternator typically must have a large number of poles to provide a higher electrical frequency at a lower rotational speed. However, there is often a practical limit to the number of poles a particular motor or alternator can have, for example due to space limitations. Once the practical limit is reached, in order to achieve a desired power level the motor or alternator must be relatively large, and thus have a corresponding lower power density.
Moreover, existing multipole windings for alternators and electric motors typically require winding geometry and often complex winding machines in order to meet size and/or power needs. As the number of poles increases, the winding problem is typically made worse. Additionally, as pole count increases, coil losses also increase (for example, due to resistive effects in the copper wire or other material comprising the coil). However, greater numbers of poles have certain advantages, for example allowing a higher voltage constant per turn, providing higher torque density, and producing voltage at a higher frequency.
Most commonly, electric motors are of a radial flux type. To a far lesser extent, some electric motors are implemented as transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines. It is desirable to develop improved electric motor and/or alternator performance and/or configurability. In particular, improved transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines are desirable, including those configured with laminated and/or powdered metal portions and combinations thereof.
With reference to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings:
The following description is of various exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the present disclosure in any way. Rather, the following description is intended to provide a convenient illustration for implementing various embodiments including the best mode. As will become apparent, various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of the elements described in these embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended statements.
For the sake of brevity, conventional techniques for electrical system construction, management, operation, measurement, optimization, and/or control, as well as conventional techniques for magnetic flux utilization, concentration, control, and/or management, may not be described in detail herein. Furthermore, the connecting lines shown in various figures contained herein are intended to represent exemplary functional relationships and/or physical couplings between various elements. It should be noted that many alternative or additional functional relationships or physical connections may be present in a practical electrical system, for example an AC synchronous electric motor, a generator, and/or the like.
Various shortcomings of prior electrical machines can be addressed by utilizing transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines configured in accordance with principles of the present disclosure. As used herein, a “transverse flux machine” and/or “commutated flux machine” may be any electrical machine wherein magnetic flux paths have sections where the flux is generally transverse to a rotational plane of the machine. In an exemplary embodiment, when a magnet and/or flux concentrating components are on a rotor and/or are moved as the machine operates, the electrical machine may be a pure “transverse” flux machine. In another exemplary embodiment, when a magnet and/or flux concentrating components are on a stator and/or are held stationary as the machine operates, the electrical machine may be a pure “commutated” flux machine. As is readily apparent, in certain configurations a “transverse flux machine” may be considered to be a “commutated flux machine” by fixing the rotor and moving the stator, and vice versa. Moreover, a coil may be fixed to a stator; alternatively, a coil may be fixed to a rotor.
There is a spectrum of functionality and device designs bridging the gap between a commutated flux machine and a transverse flux machine. Certain designs may rightly fall between these two categories, or be considered to belong to both simultaneously. Therefore, as will be apparent to one skilled in the art, in this disclosure a reference to a “transverse flux machine” may be equally applicable to a “commutated flux machine” and vice versa.
Moreover, transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines may be configured in multiple ways. For example, with reference to
With reference now to
Yet further, many prior electric motors have offered limited torque density. As used herein, “torque density” refers to Newton-meters of continuous torque produced per kilogram of active electrical and magnetic materials in the motor. In an exemplary embodiment, continuous torque is defined as a level of output torque that produces a maximum (spatial) equilibrium temperature of 100 degrees Celsius in the motor stator, responsive to a load of duty type S1 as defined in International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard 60034-1, given ambient temperature of 25 degrees Celsius and airflow of 8 kilometers per hour around the motor.
For example, many prior electric motors are configured with a torque density of between about 0.5 Newton-meters per kilogram and about 3 Newton-meters per kilogram. Consequently, a motor of sufficient torque and/or power for a particular application may be difficult or even impossible to fit in an available area, for example when a motor sized to produce sufficient torque becomes too massive to fit in a confined space. In the case of e-bikes, the associated space constraints (for example, the limited space available in a bicycle wheel hub) often result in inclusion of comparatively underpowered and/or overweight motors, for example motors having a maximum power output of about 500 to about 900 watts.
A transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine in accordance with principles of the present disclosure may be configured with any suitable components, structures, and/or elements in order to provide desired electrical, magnetic, and/or physical properties. For example, a transverse flux machine having a continuous, thermally stable torque density in excess of 30 Newton-meters per kilogram of active electrical and magnetic material may be achieved by utilizing powdered metal teeth in connection with lamination stacks. As used herein, “continuous, thermally stable torque density” refers to a torque density maintainable by a motor, without active cooling, during continuous operation over a period of one hour or more. Moreover, in general, a continuous, thermally stable torque density may be considered to be a torque density maintainable by a motor for an extended duration of continuous operation, for example one hour or more, without significant thermal performance degradation and/or damage.
Additionally, in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured to achieve a higher voltage constant. In this manner, the number of turns in the machine may be reduced, in connection with a higher frequency. A corresponding reduction in coil resistance and/or the number of turns in the coil may thus be achieved. Similarly, as the voltage may be higher, the current may be smaller, resulting in a more efficient machine.
Yet further, in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured to achieve a high flux switching frequency, for example a flux switching frequency in excess of 500 Hz. Because flux is switched at a high frequency, torque density may be increased.
An electrical machine, for example an electric motor, may be any system configured to facilitate the switching of magnetic flux. In various exemplary embodiments, an electric motor may comprise a transverse flux machine and/or a commutated flux machine. In general, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine comprises a rotor, a stator, and a coil. A flux switch may be located on the stator or the rotor. As used herein, a “flux switch” may be any component, mechanism, or device configured to open and/or close a magnetic circuit (i.e., a portion where the permeability is significantly higher than air). A magnet may be located on the stator or the rotor. Optionally, flux concentrating portions may be included on the stator and/or the rotor.
A coil may be at least partially enclosed and/or partially surrounded by the stator or the rotor. In an exemplary embodiment, a “partially enclosed” or “partially surrounded” coil may be considered to be a coil wherein more than 50% of the coil exterior is surrounded by the stator and/or rotor. In another exemplary embodiment, a “partially enclosed” or “partially surrounded” coil may be considered to be a coil wherein a magnet, a flux concentrator, and/or a flux switch surrounds the coil by greater than 180 degrees (i.e., more than halfway around the coil).
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, and with renewed reference to
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, and with reference to
Turning now to
With reference now to
Additional details regarding side laminations, lamination stacks, segmented lamination stacks, materials for laminations and the like may be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/291,373 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS HAVING SEGMENTED STATOR LAMINATIONS” having the same filing date as the present application, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Turning now to
In an exemplary embodiment, tooth 516 has a width of about 3 mm, a height of about 5 mm, and a length of about 10.25 mm. In another exemplary embodiment, tooth 516 has a width of about 4.5 mm, a height of about 5 mm, and a length of about 10.25 mm. In various exemplary embodiments, tooth 516 is configured with a width of between about 2 mm and about 15 mm, a height of between about 2 mm and about 15 mm, and a length of between about 7 mm and about 25 mm. Moreover, tooth 516 may be configured with any suitable dimensions, geometries, and/or materials in order to facilitate switching of magnetic flux in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine.
In an exemplary embodiment, tooth 516 has a volume of about 200 cubic millimeters. In another exemplary embodiment, tooth 516 has a volume of about 150 cubic millimeters. In various exemplary embodiments, tooth 516 has a volume of between about 100 cubic millimeters and about 2 cubic centimeters. In various exemplary embodiments, tooth 516 has a mass of between about 1 gram and about 15 grams. In various exemplary embodiments, tooth 516 has a density of between about 4 grams per cubic centimeter and about 8 grams per cubic centimeter. Moreover, tooth 516 may be configured with any suitable volume, density, and/or mass in order to facilitate switching of magnetic flux in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine.
In various exemplary embodiments, tooth 516 is configured with a switching surface 5165 intended to face an air gap in a transverse flux machine and/or a commutated flux machine. Switching surface 516S may be planar; alternatively, switching surface 516S may be convex and/or concave. Switching surface 516S may be configured with various lengths, widths, curves, and/or the like, as suitable. For example, in an exemplary embodiment the length and width of switching surface 516S may be selected based on dimensions of a portion of a rotor with which tooth 516 is intended to interface. For example, switching surface 516S may be configured to have a width about the same width as a flux concentrator in a rotor of a transverse flux machine. Moreover, switching surface 516S may be configured to have a width wider than the width of a flux concentrator in a rotor of a transverse flux machine.
For example, in an exemplary embodiment switching surface 516S is configured with a width about 1.2 times the width of a flux concentrator in a rotor. In another exemplary embodiment, switching surface 516S is configured with a width about 1.5 times the width of a flux concentrator in a rotor. In another exemplary embodiment, switching surface 516S is configured with a width about 1.875 times the width of a flux concentrator in a rotor. In various exemplary embodiments, switching surface 516S is configured with a width of between about 1 time to about 2 times the width of a flux concentrator in a rotor. Moreover, a desirable ratio of the width of switching surface 516S to the width of a flux concentrator in a rotor may vary, for example based on dimensions of an air gap in a transverse flux machine.
In various exemplary embodiments, switching surface 516S may be configured to have a desired configuration, for example a desired width, at least in part as a function of a pole pitch in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine. With reference now to
In an exemplary embodiment, W is about 4.5 mm, P is about 5.7 mm, and transverse flux machine 500 is configured with 60 poles. In this exemplary embodiment, the ratio of W to P is about 0.79. In another exemplary embodiment, W is about 3 mm, P is about 4.75 mm, and transverse flux machine 500 is configured with 72 poles. In this exemplary embodiment, the ratio of W to P is about 0.63. In various exemplary embodiments, the ratio of W to P may be between about 0.5 and about 0.95. Moreover, the ratio of W to P may be selected based on one or more of a desired cogging torque in transverse flux machine 500, the diameter of rotor 550, the number of poles in transverse flux machine 500, the dimensions of an air gap in transverse flux machine 500, and/or the like, as suitable, in order to achieve one or more desired operational and/or performance characteristics of transverse flux machine 500. Moreover, stated generally, switching surface 516S may be configured to maximize the amount of flux switched between a rotor and a stator in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine.
In various exemplary embodiments, switching surface 516S may be configured for switching a sufficient amount of magnetic flux in order to saturate or nearly saturate other components of a magnetic flux path in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine. Moreover, switching surface 516S and/or other portions of tooth 516 may be configured to reduce flux leakage in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine.
In various exemplary embodiments, tooth 516 is configured to be generally rectangular in cross section at one end, and at least partially tapered in one or more dimensions toward another end. Moreover, in certain exemplary embodiments a portion of tooth 516 may be at least partially flared and/or dovetail-shaped, for example in order to facilitate mechanical, dovetail-like coupling to a lamination stack 414. Additionally, tooth 516 may be configured with various cutouts, trenches, extrusions, depressions, ridges, steps, notches, and/or other geometric features configured to allow tooth 516 to at least partially align with extensions 412X and/or other portions of a lamination stack 414. In an exemplary embodiment, with momentary reference to
The shape of tooth 516 may be configured to maximize the engagement and transfer of flux over a mating surface of tooth 516, for example over switching surface 516S (where flux may be received from and/or transferred to a rotor), over the “bottom” (e.g., the side of tooth 516 opposite switching surface 516S, where flux may be received from and/or transferred to lamination stack 414) and/or the sides of tooth 516 (where flux may be received from and/or transferred to lamination stack 414).
Moreover, the shape of tooth 516 may be configured to maximize the engagement of flux over a mating surface of tooth 516 while generating a flow of flux around a coil in a desired direction. In various exemplary embodiments the shape of tooth 516 is configured to reduce hysteresis losses in a rotor, for example by extending a desired axial distance along a flux concentrator in a rotor. Additionally, in various exemplary embodiments, the shape of tooth 516 contributes to reduced eddy current losses in a coil, for example by at least partially shielding the coil from flux switching across an air gap in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine. In an exemplary embodiment, the shape of tooth 516 is selected to produce an electrical machine with a high torque density, for example by acting as a flux concentrator for flux transferred through lamination stack 414. Additionally, the shape of tooth 516 may be selected to produce an electrical machine with a smaller physical footprint, such as a reduced length along the axis of rotation of a transverse flux machine, by shortening the length of tooth 516. Yet further, the shape of tooth 516 may be configured to reduce cogging torque in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine.
Turning now to
With reference now to
In various exemplary embodiments, cuts 615 may be configured to interlock portions of adjacent lamination stacks 614, for example as illustrated in
In an exemplary embodiment, portions of cuts 615 in lamination stack 614 define generally “female” portions of lamination stack 614. A non-magnetic coupling component, for example a “double dovetail”-like insert 617 configured with two “male” portions, may then be coupled to the corresponding female portions of adjacent lamination stacks 614 order to couple adjacent lamination stacks 614. It will be appreciated that the respective location of male and female portions on lamination stack 614 and inserts 617 may also be reversed, as suitable. Moreover, any suitable combination of male and female portions may be utilized, as desired. While a dovetail-like interlocking is illustrated in
Moreover, multiple lamination stacks 614 may be coupled together via the use of various non-magnetic coupling components such as inserts 617, for example in order to form a generally ring-shaped structure. Stated generally, cuts 615 may be configured to provide features for mechanical connection between lamination stacks 614, and/or between lamination stacks 614 and other components of a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine, for example inserts 617.
In various exemplary embodiments, with continued reference to
In an exemplary embodiment, turning now to
With additional reference now to
Additional details regarding back return laminations are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/291,373 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS HAVING SEGMENTED STATOR LAMINATIONS” having the same filing date as the present application, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
In an exemplary embodiment, with reference now to
In rotor 750, magnets 754 may be configured to be “extended” with respect to flux concentrators 752, for example by magnets 754 extending a first distance in a direction away from a coil in transverse flux machine 700 while flux concentrators 752 extend a second, shorter distance in the direction away from the coil. Moreover, rotor 750 may be configured to be at least partially overhung with respect to polyphase stator assembly 710, for example by overhanging a first side of polyphase stator assembly 710 and a second side of polyphase stator assembly 710 in a direction parallel to an air gap between rotor 750 and polyphase stator assembly 710. Additional details regarding extended magnets and/or overhung rotors are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/772,958 filed on May 3, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,053,944 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS CONFIGURED TO PROVIDE REDUCED FLUX LEAKAGE, HYSTERESIS LOSS REDUCTION, AND PHASE MATCHING”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
When transverse flux machine 700 is operated as a motor, responsive to a polyphase input current (for example, an AC input current differing in phase in each of dual wound coils 720A, 720B, and 720C, rotor 750 is driven to rotate with respect to polyphase stator assembly 710. When transverse flux machine 700 is operated as a generator, responsive to a mechanical force causing rotor 750 to rotate, an AC output current is induced in each of dual wound coils 720A, 720B, and 720C.
In various exemplary embodiments, transverse flux machine 700 is configured with a voltage constant KE (also referred to as back EMF constant) of between about 0.06 to about 0.3 in each phase in polyphase stator assembly 710, when KE is calculated as (volts phase-to-phase)/(RPMs). In certain exemplary embodiments, transverse flux machine 700 having a particular diameter is configured with a voltage constant KE of between about 0.03 to about 0.5. In contrast, various prior art electric motors having a similar diameter, for example electric motors configured for use as bicycle motors, are configured with a voltage constant KE of about 0.03 to about 0.015. Because transverse flux machine 700 may be configured with a higher voltage constant KE compared to various prior motors, transverse flux machine 700 can offer improved performance. Moreover, voltage constants in electrical machines may vary based at least in part on the diameter and/or width of an electrical machine. As such, the examples provided above are illustrative and not exhaustive.
In various exemplary embodiments, when transverse flux machine 700 is configured with three phases (each phase having an axial thickness of about 20 mm, for a total axial thickness of about 60 mm), and a diameter of about 120 mm, transverse flux machine 700 is configured with a motor constant KM of between about 3 Newton-meters per root watt (Nm/√W) and about 5 Newton-meters per root watt. In various other exemplary embodiments, when transverse flux machine 700 is configured with three phases (each phase having an axial thickness of about 35 mm, for a total axial thickness of about 105 mm), and a diameter of about 330 mm, transverse flux machine 700 is configured with a motor constant KM of between about 24 Newton-meters per root watt and about 36 Newton-meters per root watt Moreover, motor constants in electrical machines may vary based at least in part on the diameter of an electrical machine. As such, the examples provided above are illustrative and not exhaustive.
Because transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines configured in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, for example transverse flux machine 700, may be configured with a higher motor constant KM compared to various prior motors of similar diameters and number of phases, transverse flux machine 700 can offer improved performance. For example, transverse flux machine 700 can provide for extended operational times and/or vehicle ranges for a particular battery, use of less expensive battery chemistries having lower peak current draw capability (as transverse flux machine 700 often requires a lower current to produce a particular output torque when compared to various prior motors of similar diameters and number of phases), reduced and/or eliminated cooling components due to reduced thermal losses, and/or the like.
In various exemplary embodiments, transverse flux machine 700 is configured with between about 12 turns and about 24 turns in each of dual wound coils 720A, 720B, and 720C. In an exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 700 is configured to achieve an output torque of about 10 Newton-meters at a current level of about 100 amp-turns in each of dual wound coils 720A, 720B, and 720C. In another exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 700 is configured to achieve an output torque of about 5 Newton-meters at a current level of about 100 amp-turns in each of dual wound coils 720A, 720B, and 720C.
Yet further, in an exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 700 is configured to achieve an output torque of about 88 Newton-meters at a current level of about 1000 amp-turns in each of dual wound coils 720A, 720B, and 720C. In another exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 700 is configured to achieve an output torque of about 45 Newton-meters at a current level of about 1000 amp-turns in each of dual wound coils 720A, 720B, and 720C. Moreover, in various exemplary embodiments, transverse flux machine 700 is configured to achieve an output torque of between about 2 Newton-meters and about 50 Newton-meters at a current level of between about 50 amp-turns and about 500 amp-turns in each of dual wound coils 720A, 720B, and 720C. In certain exemplary embodiments, transverse flux machine 700 is configured to operate at a current level of between about 1 amp-turn and about 3000 amp-turns in each of dual wound coils 720A, 720B, and 720C.
Turning now to
Stator assembly 810 may be configured with any suitable shapes, geometries, and/or dimensions configured to facilitate the flow of flux around coil 820. In one exemplary embodiment, stator assembly 810 comprises stator half 810-1 and stator half 810-2. Stator half 810-1 and stator half 810-2 are coupled by one or more back return laminations 818 to provide flux paths around coil 820. In an exemplary embodiment, stator assembly 810 is configured to interface with rotor 850 in a face engaged configuration. In another exemplary embodiment, stator assembly 810 is configured to be cavity engaged with rotor 850.
In an exemplary embodiment, with reference again to
Coil 820 may have any suitable length, diameter and/or other dimensions and/or geometries, as desired. In an exemplary embodiment, coil 820 is substantially circular about an axis of rotation of transverse flux machine 800. In an exemplary embodiment, coil 820 is coupled to an interior surface of stator assembly 810. Coil 820 may be desirably spaced away from and/or magnetically insulated from rotor 850 and/or stator assembly 810. For example, coil 820 may be desirably spaced away from and/or magnetically insulated from rotor 850 and/or stator assembly 810 in order to reduce eddy currents and/or other induced effects in coil 820 responsive to flux switching.
In an exemplary embodiment, coil 820 is electrically coupled to a current source. The current source may be any suitable current source, but in various exemplary embodiments, the current source is alternating current.
In an exemplary embodiment, coil 820 is generally constructed from copper. However, coil 820 may be made out of any suitable electrically conductive material and/or materials such as silver, gold, aluminum, superconducting materials, and/or the like. Furthermore, coil 820 may be one solid piece, or may be made by coiling, layering, stacking, and/or otherwise joining many smaller strands or wires of electrically conductive material and/or low-loss materials together. In various exemplary embodiments, coil 820 may be dual wound, edge-wound or flat-wound, as suitable, in order to reduce eddy currents and/or other losses. Additional details regarding exemplary coil shapes and configurations are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/611,737 filed on Nov. 3, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,868,508 entitled “POLYPHASE TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS”, and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/291,385 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM COIL CONCEPTS” having the same filing date as the present application, the contents of each which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, stator assembly 810 and rotor 850 interact to create a magnetic flux circuit. Flux conduction is created, for example, by the switching opposite pole flux concentrators 852 of rotor 850 approaching switching surfaces 816S of teeth 816 in stator half 810-1 and 810-2 (e.g., switching surfaces 816S-1 and 816S-2). In an exemplary embodiment, opposite pole flux concentrators 852 are adjacent and interleaved in rotor 850. In various exemplary embodiments, a flux path is created through the switching elements of stator assembly 810. In an exemplary embodiment, AC synchronous flux flow is generated in response to similar flux conduction and flux paths being created simultaneously in adjacent flux concentrators 852. In another exemplary embodiment, asynchronous flux flow is generated in response to flux conduction and flux paths being created in adjacent flux concentrators 852 at slightly delayed intervals.
In an exemplary embodiment wherein transverse flux machine 800 operates as a generator, as rotor 850 moves from a first position to a second position relative to stator assembly 810, flux flows in an opposite direction within stator assembly 810, as compared to the first (prior) position of rotor 850. The change in flux direction in stator assembly 810 causes the flux to be conducted around coil 820 in alternating directions. The alternating flux direction results in generation of alternating electrical output in coil 820.
In various exemplary embodiments, rotor 850 is driven to rotate. Rotor 850 movement may be controlled by a control system which controls, for example, rotor RPM, axial positioning, acceleration, rotational direction, deceleration, starting, and/or stopping. In an exemplary embodiment, rotor 850 is driven in either rotational direction (clockwise or counterclockwise), for example depending on a preference of an operator and/or according to programming. The control system may further comprise programming memory, and a user interface, which may include graphics. The control system may include ports for coupling to additional electrical devices and/or may be coupled to additional electrical devices wirelessly. The control system may further comprise sensors for monitoring and measuring desired values of the system. These values may include one or more of phase matching, phase propagation, input waveforms, output waveforms, flux density, voltage constant, torque constant, webers of flux switched, RPM, amperes of current, wattage, system malfunctions, and/or the like. A power source may be coupled to the control system. This power source may be any suitable power source for operation of the control system, such as alternating current, direct current, capacitive charge, and/or inductance. In an exemplary embodiment, the power source is a DC battery.
Portions of rotor 850 and/or stator assembly 810 may comprise any suitable flux conducting material and/or materials, such as steel, silicon steel, amorphous metals, metallic glass alloys, powdered metals such as powdered iron, and/or the like. In an exemplary embodiment, portions of transverse flux machine 800, such as portions of stator assembly 810 and/or rotor 850, may be comprised of Metglas® brand amorphous metal products produced by Hitachi Metals America, for example Metglas® brand magnetic alloy 2605SA1 and/or the like. Moreover, portions of stator assembly 810 and/or rotor 850 may comprise nickel-iron alloys, for example “Carpenter 49” material manufactured by Carpenter Technology Corporation, and/or the like. Additionally, portions of stator assembly 810 and/or rotor 850 may comprise cobalt-iron alloys, for example “Hiperco 50” material manufactured by Carpenter Technology Corporation, and/or the like. Yet further, portions of stator assembly 810 and/or rotor 850 may comprise powdered metal and/or other soft magnetic composite materials. In general, portions of stator assembly 810 and/or rotor 850 may comprise any suitable material or materials having a desired electrical resistivity and/or magnetic permeability.
In an exemplary embodiment, portions of transverse flux machine 800, such as portions of magnets 854, may comprise permanent magnets, for example rare earth magnets. The magnetic material may comprise any suitable material, for example neodymium-iron-boron (NIB) material. In an exemplary embodiment, the rare earth permanent magnets have a suitable magnetic field, for example a field in the range of about 0.5 Tesla to about 2.5 Tesla.
In other exemplary embodiments, magnets 854 may comprise ceramic magnets, for example hard ferrites comprising iron and barium or strontium oxides. In an exemplary embodiment, magnets 854 may comprise FB9N-class material (SrO6Fe2O3) manufactured by TDK Corporation. In an exemplary embodiment, the ceramic magnets have a suitable magnetic field, for example a field in the range of about 0.1 Tesla to about 0.35 Tesla. In other exemplary embodiments, magnets 854 comprise inducted magnets and/or electromagnets. The inducted magnets and/or electromagnets may be made out of iron, iron alloys, metallic alloys, and/or the like, as well as other suitable materials as is known.
In various exemplary embodiments, teeth 816 are configured to reduce flux leakage in transverse flux machine 800. For example, in an exemplary embodiment teeth 816 taper towards one end in order to maintain a desired separation distance between teeth 816 in stator half 810-1 and teeth 816 in stator half 810-2. In this manner, more teeth 816 may be placed in transverse flux machine 800 while maintaining a desired minimum separation distance between teeth 816. In contrast, if teeth 816 were configured as generally non-tapering, rectangular structures, then the outer corners of adjacent teeth 816 would be closer to one another, increasing flux leakage therebetween.
In an exemplary embodiment, tooth 816 spans a distance LT from side S1 of stator assembly 810 to less than side S2 of stator assembly 810. In another exemplary embodiment, tooth 816 spans a distance LT from side S2 of stator assembly 810 to less than side S1 of stator assembly 810. In some exemplary embodiments, at least one tooth 816 spans distance DS from side S1 to side S2 of stator assembly 810.
In various exemplary embodiments, distance LT may be selected based on a number of poles in transverse flux machine 800. Stated generally, distance LT may vary in an inverse relationship with the number of poles in transverse flux machine 800. Moreover, teeth 816 in stator half 810-1 may be configured with a first distance LT, and teeth 816 in stator half 810-2 may be configured with a second distance LT. First distance LT and second distance LT may be the same, or they may differ from one another.
In an exemplary embodiment, tooth 816 spans distance LT, where distance LT is at least 20 mm. In various exemplary embodiments tooth 816 spans distance LT, where distance LT is between about 5 mm and about 50 mm. In other exemplary embodiments, tooth 816 spans distance LT, where distance LT is between about 4 mm and about 10 cm. Moreover, tooth 816 may span any suitable distance LT. In various exemplary embodiments, tooth 816 may extend from one side of stator assembly 810 to about the middle of stator assembly 810. In these embodiments, stator assembly 810 may be understood to be configured with a stator tooth overlap of about 0%. “0% overlap” may also be understood to mean alternating teeth 816 extending from the side of stator assembly 810 to a position other than about the middle of stator assembly 810, provided teeth 816 originating on side S1 of stator assembly 810 extend to about the same location as teeth 816 originating on the opposing side (e.g., side S2) of stator assembly 810. Moreover, stator assembly 810 may be configured with any suitable amount of stator tooth overlap, as desired. Additional details regarding stator tooth overlap are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/772,958 filed on May 3, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,053,944 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS CONFIGURED TO PROVIDE REDUCED FLUX LEAKAGE, HYSTERESIS LOSS REDUCTION, AND PHASE MATCHING”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
In various exemplary embodiments, tooth 816 decreases in thickness (e.g., tapers and/or otherwise varies in one or more dimensions) as tooth 816 extends from one side of stator assembly 810 toward the other side of stator assembly 810. In an exemplary embodiment, tooth 816 is configured with a substantially constant thickness where tooth 816 contacts lamination stack 814, and with a varying thickness (e.g., taper) in the area where tooth 816 extends beyond the edge of lamination stack 814. In other exemplary embodiments, tooth 816 is configured with a constant thickness as tooth 816 extends from one side of stator assembly 810 toward another side of stator assembly 810.
In an exemplary embodiment, the size of the distance of the air gap between stator assembly 810 and rotor 850 is substantially constant across switching surface 816S. In an alternative embodiment, the size of the air gap between stator assembly 810 and rotor 850 may be variable over switching surface 816S.
In various exemplary embodiments, tooth 816 is configured to facilitate flow of flux in one or more directions, including a radial direction, a rotational direction, and/or an axial direction in transverse flux machine 800. In contrast, lamination stacks 814 are configured to facilitate flow of flux generally in a radial direction (and/or to a lesser degree, a rotational direction). Moreover, back return laminations 818 are configured to facilitate flow of flux generally in an axial direction (and/or to a lesser degree, a radial direction).
With additional reference now to
In various exemplary embodiments, tooth 816 may be configured to act as a flux concentrator, increasing the amount of flux switched across switching surface 816S when compared to other materials and/or configurations. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, tooth 816 generally switches more flux across an air gap in a transverse flux machine than an alternative approach wherein portions of lamination stack 814 are extended to form a switch having similar area to switching surface 816S.
In accordance with principles of the present disclosure, components for transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines, including components forming a stator half (e.g., stator half, 710-1, 810-1, and/or the like) may be manufactured in a variety of ways. Turning now to
In an exemplary embodiment, ring 901 is coupled to 30 teeth 916. In another exemplary embodiment, ring 901 is integrally formed with 30 teeth 916. Moreover, more or fewer teeth 916 may be utilized, for example depending on a desired number of poles in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine.
In an exemplary embodiment, teeth 916 are distributed evenly around ring 901. In other exemplary embodiments, teeth 916 are distributed unevenly around ring 901, for example in order to implement a sixth phase offset or other desired phase offset.
Once teeth 916 are coupled to ring 901, lamination stacks 914 are placed inside ring 901. Teeth 916 slide into trenches on lamination stacks 914. Lamination stacks 914 may also interlock with one another. Epoxy or other suitable adhesive and/or structural material may be applied, infused, and/or otherwise utilized in order to secure teeth 916 to lamination stacks 914, and to secure lamination stacks 914 with respect to one another. In an exemplary embodiment, lamination stacks 914 and teeth 916 are coupled via a two part epoxy, for example Rhino brand 1310L-6 resin and 3138 hardener. Moreover, any suitable adhesive, structural material, and/or bonding agent may be utilized.
Once teeth 916 and lamination stacks 914 are secured with respect to one another, ring 901 may be removed, for example by cutting, grinding, machining, or other suitable process or method. The process of removing ring 901 may also be utilized to configure, shape, and/or prepare switching surfaces on teeth 916, for example by controlling the height to which teeth 916 extend beyond the edge of trenches in lamination stacks 914.
In other exemplary embodiments, one or more teeth 916 may be secured to a lamination stack 914. Subsequently, multiple lamination stacks 914 having teeth 916 therein may be linked together to form a stator half.
With reference now to
In another exemplary embodiment, a method 980 for constructing a stator half comprises forming a ring with slots therein (step 981), placing teeth in the slots (step 982), placing a lamination stack in the ring (step 983), infusing a bonding agent to couple the lamination stack to a tooth (step 985), and removing the ring (step 987).
In various exemplary embodiments, with reference now to
In an exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 1000 may be generally configured with an outer form factor at least partially defined by rotor body 1056. Transverse flux machine 1000 may be coupled to a wheel, for example a bicycle wheel, via a plurality of spoke holes 1059. Transverse flux machine 1000 may also be coupled to gear cassette 1080 and/or other suitable components in order to allow transverse flux machine 1000 to interface with various driveline and/or control components of a bicycle or other LEV (e.g., brake calipers, foot pedals, chains, belts, and/or the like).
In various exemplary embodiments, transverse flux machine 1000 is configured to be located in the same location as and/or replace the hub of a wheel, such as an e-bike wheel. Stated another way, in certain exemplary embodiments transverse flux machine 1000 may be no wider along the axis of rotation than an available distance in a wheel, for example the distance between gear cassette 1080 and a brake disc of a bicycle. Moreover, in many exemplary embodiments transverse flux machine 100 may be configured to be lightweight, for example having a total mass of less than about 5 kilograms including all structural, mechanical, electrical, and magnetic components. Additionally, transverse flux machine 1000 may be configured to be compact, for example having a volume less than 2,000 cubic centimeters (cc), less than 1000 cc, and/or less than 750 cc. Yet further, transverse flux machine 1000 may be configured to utilize a suitable mass of active electrical and/or magnetic components, for example between about 3.3 kilograms and about 4 kilograms of active electrical and/or magnetic components.
In various exemplary embodiments, transverse flux machine 1000 may provide a continuous, thermally stable output torque of about 5 Newton-meters to about 30 Newton-meters, and a peak output torque of about 10 Newton-meters to about 100 Newton-meters. Yet further, transverse flux machine 1000 may be operative at a high efficiency, for example an efficiency above 90%, over a particular output torque range, for example between an output torque of about 15 Newton-meters to about 45 Newton-meters, and/or over a particular RPM range, for example between about 25 RPM and about 300 RPM. Stated generally, transverse flux machine 1000 may be more compact, torque dense, efficient, and/or powerful than various prior electrical machines, particularly electrical machines of a similar size and/or mass.
In various exemplary embodiments, transverse flux machine 1000 may be configured with various sensors, including torque sensors, strain gauges, Hall effect sensors, temperature sensors, and/or the like, in order to facilitate operation and/or characterization and assessment of transverse flux machine 1000. Additional details regarding utilization of transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines in electric bicycles and other light electric vehicles are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/772,959 filed on May 3, 2010, now U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0169381 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS FOR ELECTRIC BICYCLES”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
In accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may desirably be utilized to provide mechanical output to robotic devices, prosthetic limbs, powered exoskeletons, industrial equipment, and/or the like. Moreover, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may desirably be utilized to provide mechanical output to relatively lightweight vehicles such as bicycles, scooters, motorcycles, quads, golf carts, or other vehicles. Yet further, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may desirably be utilized to power an automobile, a truck, bus, or other passenger vehicle. Additionally, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may desirably be utilized in small engine applications, for example portable generators, power tools, and other electrical equipment. A transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may also desirably be utilized to provide mechanical output to propeller-driven devices, for example boats, airplanes, and/or the like. A transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may also desirably be utilized in various machine tools, for example rotating spindles, tables configured to move large masses, and/or the like. Yet further, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may also be desirably utilized in large-scale power generation applications, for example in fixed installations providing 10 Kw or more of electrical power. In general, transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines may be utilized to provide electrical and/or mechanical input and/or output to and/or from any suitable devices.
Electrical machines configured in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, for example transverse flux machine 700, transverse flux machine 800 and/or transverse flux machine 1000, may be configured to operate at any suitable voltage and/or voltages. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate at a voltage of about 24 volts in coil 820. In another exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate at a voltage of about 48 volts in coil 820. In another exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate at a voltage of about 160 volts in coil 820. In another exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate at a voltage of about 600 volts in coil 820. Moreover, transverse flux machine 800 may be configured to operate at any suitable voltage and/or voltages, as desired.
Electrical machines configured in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, for example transverse flux machine 700, transverse flux machine 800 and/or transverse flux machine 1000, may be configured to operate in connection with any suitable controller and/or controllers. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate in connection with a pulse width modulation (PWM) controller. In various exemplary embodiments, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate in connection with a sinusoidal drive, a trapezoidal drive, and/or the like. Moreover, transverse flux machine 800 may be configured to operate in connection with field-oriented control, block commutation, and/or the like.
In accordance with various exemplary embodiments, turning now to
For example, with reference to
For example, a prior art bicycle motor achieves an output torque of about 15 Newton-meters while incurring resistive coil losses of about 50 watts. In contrast, TFM 1100-1 achieves an output torque of about 15 Newton-meters while incurring resistive coil losses of only about 12 watts. Moreover, TFM 1100-2 achieves an output torque of about 15 Newton-meters while incurring resistive coil losses of only about 4 watts. Because TFM 1100-1 and TFM 1100-2 incur lower resistive coil losses when operated at a similar level of output torque as a prior art motor, TFM 1100-1 and TFM 1100-2 operate at reduced temperatures.
Moreover, in various exemplary embodiments, TFM 1100-1 and TFM 1100-2 can offer torque output levels that a prior art motor simply cannot achieve. Moreover, TFM 1100-1 and 1100-2 may offer continuous, thermally stable output torque levels that exceed the peak torque achievable by a prior art motor. Continuing to reference
Moreover, TFM 1100-2 achieves an output torque of about 60 Newton-meters while incurring resistive coil losses of about 50 watts. TFM 1100-2 is thermally stable at this level of resistive coil loss, and thus TFM 1100-2 may be configured with a continuous, thermally stable torque density exceeding the peak torque of a prior art bicycle hub motor.
As can be appreciated, utilizing an electric motor configured in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, for example TFM 1100-1 and/or TFM 1100-2 having the ability to produce higher torque at a given level of resistive coil losses compared to a prior art motor, allows an electric bicycle or LEV to travel further on a comparable battery charge, to climb a wider range of grades and engage headwinds more effectively, and to propel heavier riders and/or other loads.
Turning now to
Moreover, when operated at about 500 amp-turns per coil, the prior art motor achieves about 33 Newton-meters of output torque. In contrast, when operated at about 500 amp-turns per coil, TFM 1100-1 achieves about 43 Newton-meters of output torque. Yet further, when operated at about 500 amp-turns per coil, TFM 1100-2 achieves about 54 Newton-meters of output torque.
Because TFM 1100-1 and/or TFM 1100-2 achieve higher output torque per amp-turn compared to a prior art motor, TFM 1100-1 and/or TFM 1100-2 may operate at a higher continuous, thermally stable torque level as compared to the prior art motor.
Principles of the present disclosure may suitably be combined with various other principles related to transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines. For example, principles of the present disclosure may suitably be combined with principles for stators in transverse flux machines and commutated flux machines, for example principles for partial stators and/or gapped stators, as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/611,728 filed on Nov. 3, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,851,965 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM STATOR CONCEPTS”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles for rotors in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines, for example tape wound rotors and/or multipath rotors, as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/611,733 filed on Nov. 3, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,923,886 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM ROTOR CONCEPTS”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of polyphase transverse flux machines and/or polyphase commutated flux machines as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/611,737 filed on Nov. 3, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,868,508 entitled “POLYPHASE TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of extended magnets, overhung rotors, and/or stator tooth overlap in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/772,958 filed on May 3, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,053,944 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS CONFIGURED TO PROVIDE REDUCED FLUX LEAKAGE, HYSTERESIS LOSS REDUCTION, AND PHASE MATCHING”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of utilization of transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines in electric bicycles as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/772,959 filed on May 3, 2010, now U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0169381 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS FOR ELECTRIC BICYCLES”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of phase offset in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/772,962 filed on May 3, 2010, now U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0169366 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED SYSTEMS HAVING PHASE OFFSET”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of electrical isolation and/or segmentation in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/291,373 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS HAVING SEGMENTED STATOR LAMINATIONS” having the same filing date as the present application, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of coils, including dual wound coils in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/291,385 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM COIL CONCEPTS” having the same filing date as the present application, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of isolated torque sensing systems as disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/453,000 filed Mar. 15, 2011 entitled “ISOLATED TORQUE SENSOR”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of adjustable Hall effect sensor systems as disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/453,006 filed Mar. 15, 2011 and entitled “ADJUSTABLE HALL EFFECT SENSOR SYSTEM”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Moreover, principles of the present disclosure may suitably be combined with any number of principles disclosed in any one of and/or all of the U.S. patents and/or patent applications incorporated by reference herein. Thus, for example, a particular transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may incorporate use of segmented stator laminations, use of rainbow-like back return laminations, use of a dual wound coil, use of a lamination stack with powdered metal teeth, use of a sixth-phase offset, use of extended magnets, use of an overhung rotor, use of stator tooth overlap, use of a tape wound rotor, use of a multipath rotor, use of a partial stator, use of a polyphase design, use of a torque sensor, use of an adjustable Hall effect sensor system, and/or the like. All such combinations, permutations, and/or other interrelationships are considered to be within the scope of the present disclosure.
While the principles of this disclosure have been shown in various embodiments, many modifications of structure, arrangements, proportions, the elements, materials and components, used in practice, which are particularly adapted for a specific environment and operating requirements may be used without departing from the principles and scope of this disclosure. These and other changes or modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure and may be expressed in the following claims.
The present disclosure has been described with reference to various embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the specification is to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. Likewise, benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to various embodiments. However, benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Also, as used herein, the terms “coupled,” “coupling,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a physical connection, an electrical connection, a magnetic connection, an optical connection, a communicative connection, a functional connection, and/or any other connection. When language similar to “at least one of A, B, or C” is used in the claims, the phrase is intended to mean any of the following: (1) at least one of A; (2) at least one of B; (3) at least one of C; (4) at least one of A and at least one of B; (5) at least one of B and at least one of C; (6) at least one of A and at least one of C; or (7) at least one of A, at least one of B, and at least one of C.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1361136 | Burke | Dec 1920 | A |
1783527 | Sundhaussen | Dec 1930 | A |
1809197 | Fendrich, Jr. | Jun 1931 | A |
2078668 | Kilgore | Apr 1937 | A |
2122307 | Welch | Jun 1938 | A |
3403273 | Higuchi | Sep 1968 | A |
3437854 | Oiso | Apr 1969 | A |
3558941 | Visconti Brebbia et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3700942 | Alth | Oct 1972 | A |
3710158 | Bachle et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3774059 | Cox | Nov 1973 | A |
3869625 | Sawyer | Mar 1975 | A |
3984711 | Kordik | Oct 1976 | A |
3999107 | Reuting | Dec 1976 | A |
4021691 | Dukshtau et al. | May 1977 | A |
4114057 | Esters | Sep 1978 | A |
4127802 | Johnson | Nov 1978 | A |
4206374 | Goddijn | Jun 1980 | A |
4237396 | Blenkinsop et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4237397 | Mohr et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4255684 | Mischler et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4255696 | Field, II | Mar 1981 | A |
4286180 | Langley | Aug 1981 | A |
4306164 | Itoh et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4339875 | Muller | Jul 1982 | A |
4363988 | Kliman | Dec 1982 | A |
4388545 | Honsinger et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4392072 | Rosenberry | Jul 1983 | A |
4459501 | Fawzy | Jul 1984 | A |
4501980 | Welburn | Feb 1985 | A |
4508984 | Guedj | Apr 1985 | A |
4605874 | Whiteley | Aug 1986 | A |
4611139 | Godkin et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4620752 | Fremerey et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4639626 | McGee | Jan 1987 | A |
4647802 | Konecny | Mar 1987 | A |
4658166 | Oudet | Apr 1987 | A |
4704555 | Stokes | Nov 1987 | A |
4794286 | Taenzer | Dec 1988 | A |
4797602 | West | Jan 1989 | A |
4801834 | Stokes | Jan 1989 | A |
4835840 | Stokes | Jun 1989 | A |
4850100 | Stokes | Jul 1989 | A |
4857786 | Nihei et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4883999 | Hendershot | Nov 1989 | A |
4899072 | Ohta | Feb 1990 | A |
4900965 | Fisher | Feb 1990 | A |
4959577 | Radomski | Sep 1990 | A |
4990812 | Nam | Feb 1991 | A |
5015903 | Hancock | May 1991 | A |
5038066 | Pawlak et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5051641 | Weh | Sep 1991 | A |
5062012 | Maeda et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5097167 | Kanayama et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5117142 | von Zweygbergk | May 1992 | A |
5130595 | Arora | Jul 1992 | A |
5132581 | Kusase | Jul 1992 | A |
5177054 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5195231 | Fanning et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5208503 | Hisey | May 1993 | A |
5212419 | Fisher et al. | May 1993 | A |
5214333 | Kawamura | May 1993 | A |
5250865 | Meeks | Oct 1993 | A |
5262746 | Masuda | Nov 1993 | A |
5278470 | Neag | Jan 1994 | A |
5289072 | Lange | Feb 1994 | A |
5306977 | Hayashi | Apr 1994 | A |
5338996 | Yamamoto | Aug 1994 | A |
5370200 | Takata | Dec 1994 | A |
5382859 | Huang et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386166 | Reimer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5474148 | Takata | Dec 1995 | A |
5477841 | Trost et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5485072 | Fehringer | Jan 1996 | A |
5530308 | Fanning et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5543674 | Koehler | Aug 1996 | A |
5543677 | Fakler | Aug 1996 | A |
5633551 | Weh | May 1997 | A |
5650680 | Chula | Jul 1997 | A |
5696419 | Rakestraw et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712521 | Detela | Jan 1998 | A |
5717262 | Muller et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5723921 | Sugiura | Mar 1998 | A |
5726514 | Wurz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729065 | Fremery et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731649 | Caamano | Mar 1998 | A |
5773910 | Lange | Jun 1998 | A |
5777418 | Lange et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5780953 | Umeda et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5814907 | Bandera | Sep 1998 | A |
5839530 | Dietzel | Nov 1998 | A |
5879265 | Bek | Mar 1999 | A |
5886449 | Mitcham | Mar 1999 | A |
5889348 | Muhlberger et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894183 | Borchert | Apr 1999 | A |
5909339 | Hong | Jun 1999 | A |
5925965 | Li et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942828 | Hill | Aug 1999 | A |
5954779 | Dietzel | Sep 1999 | A |
5973436 | Mitcham | Oct 1999 | A |
5994802 | Shichijyo et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994814 | Kawabata | Nov 1999 | A |
6028377 | Sakamoto | Feb 2000 | A |
6043579 | Hill | Mar 2000 | A |
6060810 | Lee et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066906 | Kalsi | May 2000 | A |
6097118 | Hull | Aug 2000 | A |
6097126 | Takura | Aug 2000 | A |
6118159 | Willer | Sep 2000 | A |
6121712 | Sakamoto | Sep 2000 | A |
6133655 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133664 | Torok et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133669 | Tupper | Oct 2000 | A |
6137202 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154013 | Caamano | Nov 2000 | A |
6163097 | Smith et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175177 | Sabinski et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177748 | Katcher et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181035 | Acquaviva | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194799 | Miekka et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6215616 | Phan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229238 | Graef | May 2001 | B1 |
6232693 | Gierer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236131 | Schafer | May 2001 | B1 |
6246561 | Flynn | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6276479 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278216 | Li | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288467 | Lange et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300702 | Jack et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304010 | Sugiura | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6333582 | Asao | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342746 | Flynn | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6365999 | Muhlberger et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6445105 | Kliman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448687 | Higashino et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6455970 | Shafer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6472792 | Jack et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6492758 | Gianni et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508321 | Mueller | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6545382 | Bennett | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6603060 | Ohashi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603237 | Caamano | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629574 | Turner | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6657329 | Kastinger et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664704 | Calley | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6700271 | Detela | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707208 | Durham et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717297 | Sadarangani et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6750582 | Neet | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765321 | Sakamoto | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774512 | Takagi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6791225 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794791 | Ben Ahmed et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806602 | Hilzinger | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815863 | Jack et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6835941 | Tanaka | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6841908 | Hasegawa | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847135 | Kastinger et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849985 | Jack et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853112 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866111 | Dube | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6867530 | Gamm et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879080 | Caamano | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882066 | Kastinger | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882077 | Neet | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885124 | Neet | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885129 | Oohashi et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888272 | Kastinger | May 2005 | B2 |
6891299 | Coupart et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6924576 | Zierer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6924579 | Calley | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940197 | Fujita et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949855 | Dubois et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952068 | Gieras | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960860 | DeCristofaro | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6960862 | Hill | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979925 | Schwamm | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6989622 | Chen et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7015603 | Barrho et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7026737 | Angerer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030529 | Dommsch et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030534 | Caamano | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034425 | Detela | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7064469 | Jack et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067954 | Kuribayashi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071593 | Matsushita et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7124495 | Gieras | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126313 | Dooley | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129602 | Lange et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135802 | Seki et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7208856 | Imai et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211922 | Isoda et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7216732 | Angerer | May 2007 | B2 |
7230361 | Hirzel | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242118 | Sakamoto | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245055 | Jack | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250704 | Sortore et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7259483 | Komiya et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261186 | Deplazes | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265472 | Mitcham | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7268456 | Harada et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275844 | Watanabe | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279820 | Grundl et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7358639 | Caamano | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7385329 | Hill | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7385330 | Trzynadlowski et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7420312 | Kitamura et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7466057 | Imai et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7474030 | Mitcham | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7560840 | Lange | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568714 | Sasnowski et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579742 | Rittenhouse | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7585258 | Watson et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7592735 | Hamada | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602095 | Kusase et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7626308 | Kang | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7638919 | Pulnikov et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7679253 | Neet | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7719156 | Muhlberger | May 2010 | B2 |
7800275 | Calley | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7816830 | Dickes | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7851965 | Calley | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859141 | Sadarangani | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863797 | Calley | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7868508 | Calley et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7868511 | Calley | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7876019 | Calley | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7923886 | Calley et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7952252 | Kang | May 2011 | B2 |
7973446 | Calley et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20010001528 | Ragaly | May 2001 | A1 |
20010030479 | Mohler | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030486 | Pijanowski | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030487 | Higashino et | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020070627 | Ward et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020113520 | Kastinger et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020135242 | Kawai | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020171315 | Kastinger | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175586 | Hill | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190585 | Sakamoto | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030048018 | Sadarangani | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030102751 | Bryant | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030122439 | Horst | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030122440 | Horst | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030122442 | Jack et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040027021 | Karrelmeyer | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036370 | Hilzinger | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046478 | Zierer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061396 | Narita et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040135458 | Neet | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140730 | Barrho et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040145269 | Barrho et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150288 | Calley | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040189138 | Jack | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191519 | Kejzelman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207281 | Detela | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207283 | Oohashi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212267 | Jack et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040222706 | Ickinger | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232793 | Fujita et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232799 | Chen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239207 | Kloepzig et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251759 | Hirzel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251761 | Hirzel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262105 | Li et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006978 | Bradfield | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050012427 | Seki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050029879 | Endo | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050062348 | Ohnishi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062352 | Kastinger | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088056 | Kuribayashi | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050116575 | Zepp et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050121983 | Ehrhart | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139038 | Kjellen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156479 | Fujita et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156480 | Imai | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050212381 | Gilmour et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242679 | Walter et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060012259 | Kerlin | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060012263 | Smith et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060055280 | Isoda | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060082237 | Kerlin | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087180 | Woo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060091755 | Carlisle | May 2006 | A1 |
20060131974 | Sadarangani et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060131986 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060186754 | Kitamura et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060192453 | Gieras et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060220477 | Okumoto et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261688 | Akita et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070013253 | Dubois et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070046137 | Ooiwa | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070046139 | Ishizuka | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075605 | Enomoto et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070138900 | Imai et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152528 | Kang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070176505 | Trzynadlowski et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188037 | Lau | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070252447 | Ionel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080007126 | Popov et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080042507 | Edelson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080169776 | Acker | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179982 | Kramer | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080211326 | Kang et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080211336 | Sadarangani | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238237 | Nishihama et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080246362 | Hirzel | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080265707 | Bradfield | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080309188 | Calley | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080315700 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090021099 | Shkondin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026853 | Groening | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026866 | Groening et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090042051 | Skarman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090085415 | Ionel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090127942 | Rahman et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090152489 | Kjellen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090206693 | Calley et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090208771 | Janecek | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090243406 | Jack et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090255924 | Lovens | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284253 | Finkler et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295237 | Gloor | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322165 | Rittenhouse | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013341 | Vollmer | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100013343 | Bi | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100015432 | Bergmark et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019588 | Makino et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026135 | Hussey | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038580 | Ye et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052467 | Gieras | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100109462 | Calley et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123426 | Nashiki et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100253171 | El-Refaie et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110025140 | Pennander et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110025141 | Nord et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110037329 | Nord et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050010 | Calley et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062723 | Calley et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110133485 | Gieras | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169357 | Gieras | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1513856 | Apr 1969 | DE |
3626149 | Aug 1986 | DE |
3602687 | Aug 1987 | DE |
8711725 | Aug 1987 | DE |
3904516 | Jun 1990 | DE |
3927453 | Feb 1991 | DE |
4132340 | Mar 1993 | DE |
19639670 | Apr 1998 | DE |
19634949 | May 1998 | DE |
19650572 | Jun 1998 | DE |
19753261 | Jun 1998 | DE |
19753320 | Jun 1998 | DE |
199650697 | Jun 1998 | DE |
19704392 | Aug 1998 | DE |
19743906 | Apr 1999 | DE |
19960737 | Jul 2001 | DE |
10047675 | Apr 2002 | DE |
10053265 | May 2002 | DE |
10062073 | Jun 2002 | DE |
10128646 | Jan 2003 | DE |
10130702 | Jan 2003 | DE |
10145820 | Apr 2003 | DE |
102006026719 | Jun 2006 | DE |
102005020952 | Nov 2006 | DE |
102006048561 | Apr 2008 | DE |
102006051234 | May 2008 | DE |
102007018930 | Oct 2008 | DE |
102008054381 | Jun 2010 | DE |
102009060955 | Jul 2011 | DE |
102009060956 | Jul 2011 | DE |
102009060959 | Jul 2011 | DE |
0544200 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0707374 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0718959 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0796758 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0833429 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0998010 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1063754 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1117168 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1227566 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1921730 | May 2008 | EP |
1923683 | May 2008 | EP |
518298 | Sep 1938 | GB |
2052176 | Jan 1986 | GB |
60241758 | Nov 1985 | JP |
61042248 | Feb 1986 | JP |
2001025197 | Jan 2001 | JP |
1007577330000 | Sep 2007 | KR |
10-2008-006141 | Sep 2008 | KR |
WO 9314551 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9934497 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0130643 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 02075895 | Sep 2002 | WO |
03003548 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004111591 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005091475 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006117210 | May 2006 | WO |
2006091089 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007024184 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2008128659 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009027938 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009116935 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009116936 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009116937 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009133295 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009156297 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010036221 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010048928 | May 2010 | WO |
2010076081 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010094515 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2011080285 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011080293 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011080294 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 29, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/721,765. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 13, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/679,806. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 30, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,238. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 3, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 30, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931. |
Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/679,806. |
Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,935. |
Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/721,765. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 15, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063301. |
IPRP dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063301. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 20, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063236. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 17, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063236. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 24, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063336. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 17, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063336. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 15, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063287. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063287. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063268. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063268. |
Technical Project Presentation—Development of a High-Performance Generator for Wind Turbines—by Andrzej M. Trzynadlowski, PhD, University of Nevada, Reno, FIEEE. |
Technical Project Presentation—Development of a High-Performance Generator for Wind Turbines—Final Report—University of Nevada, Reno—Feb. 2004. |
“Magnetic Field Calculation of Claw Pole Permanent Magnet Machines Using Magnetic Network Method”, by Y.G. Guo et al., Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology, Sydney. |
“Applications of Power Electronics in Automotive Power Generation”,—by David J. Perreault et al., Laboratory for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 21-22, 2006—Paris. |
“Thermal Modeling of Lundell Alternators”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 20, No. 1, Mar. 2005. |
“Iron Loss Calculation in a Claw-Pole Structure”, by A. Reinap et al., Lund University. |
“Permanent Magnet Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Motor Design and Performance Improvement”,—A Dissertation by Peyman Niazi, Texas A&M University, Dec. 2005. |
“New Design of Hybrid-Type Self-Bearing Motor for Small, High-Speed Spindle”,—by Hideki Kanebako et al., IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 8, No. 1, Mar. 2003, retrieved Jan. 8, 2010. |
“Evaluation of Rotor Conducting Screens on the Single-Phase Switched Reluctance Machine”,—by M.M. Mahmoud et al., School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, May 3, 2005. |
“Analytical Interpretation and Quantification of Rotational Losses in Stator Cores of Induction Motors”,—IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43, No. 10, Oct. 2007, retrieved Jan. 8, 2010. |
Hasubek, B.E. et al.; “Design Limitations of Reduced Magnet Material Passive Rotor Transverse Flux Motors Investigated Using 3D Finite Element Analysis”; 2000; pp. 365-369, retrieved Oct. 24, 2008. |
Dubois, Maxine R. et al.; “Clawpole Transverse-Flux Machine with Hybrid Stator”; pp. 1-6. |
Henneberger, G. et al.; “On the Parameters Computation of a Single Sided Transverse Flux Motor”; Workshop on Electrical Machines' Parameters, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, May 26, 2001; pp. 35-40. |
Woolmer, MD, T.J., et al., “Analysis of the Yokeless and Segmented Armature Machine”, Electric Machines & Drives Conference, 2007. IEMDC apos; 07. IEEE International, May 3-5, 2007, pp. 704-708, vol. 1, Oxford University, Engineering Department, Parks Road, Oxford, UK. |
Husband, S.M. et al.; “The Rolls-Royce Transverse Flux Motor Development”; Electric Machines and Drives Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1435-1440, IEEE, 2003. |
Theory of SR Motor Operation (Power Point Presentation), copyright 2002 by George Holling and Rocky Mountain Technologies Inc. |
Development of a PM Transverse Flux Motor With Soft Magnetic Composite Core—IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 21, No. 2., Jun. 2006. |
Fundamental Modeling for Optimal Design of Transverse Flux Motors—Genevieve Patterson et al., University of Tokyo. |
www.higenmotor.com/eng/aboutus/about06read.asp?id=notice&no=87 dated Jan. 15, 2010. |
Lyng Eltorque QT 800—2.0 User Manual, version 1.0—dated Jul. 3, 2007. |
Motors: Emerging Concepts by George Holling, Apr. 2007. |
www.iem.rwth-aachen.de/index.pl/new materials and machines?makePrintable=1; retrieved Jan. 15, 2010. |
Raser Technologies Company Brochure. |
Response to Office Action filed Jan. 15, 2010 for Japanese Patent Application No. JPPA-2003-548374. |
Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931. |
Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,934. |
Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 22, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,936. |
Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,935. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 4, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 10, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/063145. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 10, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/063142. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 18, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/063147. |
Office Action dated May 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,934. |
Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,936. |
Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,733. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 12, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,728. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,737. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 8, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,934. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 6, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,935. |
Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 20, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,933. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,936. |
Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 24, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/942,495. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 28, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,936. |
“Two Dimensional Finite Analysis of Passive Rotor Transverse Flux Motors with Slanted Rotor Design” by B.E. Hasubek, et al., May 1999. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 2, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/847,991. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 9, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,733. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 3, 2011, PCT/US2009/063142. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 3, 2011, PCT/US2009/063145. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 3, 2011, PCT/US2009/063147. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 23, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,837. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 8, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,958. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 7, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,959. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 7, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,962. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 24, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,933. |
Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,962. |
Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,959. |
Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/112,619. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2012 of U.S. Appl. No. 13/291,373, filed Nov. 8, 2011 (now US Patent No. 8405275 issued Mar. 26, 2013) (12 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120119599 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61414769 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61414774 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61414781 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61453075 | Mar 2011 | US |