This application is a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/414,769 filed on Nov. 17, 2010 and entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS HAVING SEGMENTED STATOR LAMINATIONS.”
This application is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/414,774 filed on Nov. 17, 2010 and entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM COIL CONCEPTS.”
This application is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/414,781 filed on Nov. 17, 2010 and entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS HAVING LAMINATED AND POWDERED METAL PORTIONS.”
This application is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/453,075 filed on Mar. 15, 2011 and entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS HAVING LAMINATED AND POWDERED METAL PORTIONS.” The entire contents of all the foregoing applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present disclosure relates to electrical systems, and in particular to transverse flux machines and commutated flux machines.
Electric motors and generators are utilized in a wide variety of applications. Many prior approaches to electric motors and generators have been attempted. However, performance of such motors and generators is often limited, and consequently, performance of electric vehicles or other devices utilizing such motors and/or generators is also limited. Additionally, electric bicycles (“e-bikes”) and other light electric vehicles (“LEVs”), for example electric scooters, motorcycles, golf carts, and/or the like, continue to increase in popularity. Such devices provide convenient transportation, particularly in congested urban areas. It remains desirable to provide improved electric motors and/or generators, for example electric motors and/or generators configured as transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines, and particularly for use in light electric vehicles, electric automobiles, and the like.
With reference to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings:
The following description is of various exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the present disclosure in any way. Rather, the following description is intended to provide a convenient illustration for implementing various embodiments including the best mode. As will become apparent, various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of the elements described in these embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
For the sake of brevity, conventional techniques for electrical system construction, management, operation, measurement, optimization, and/or control, as well as conventional techniques for magnetic flux utilization, concentration, control, and/or management, may not be described in detail herein. Furthermore, the connecting lines shown in various figures contained herein are intended to represent exemplary functional relationships and/or physical couplings between various elements. It should be noted that many alternative or additional functional relationships or physical connections may be present in a practical electrical system, for example an AC synchronous electric motor.
Prior electric motors, for example brushless DC motors, synchronous AC motors, and/or the like, may suffer from various deficiencies. For example, many prior electric motors and associated motor controllers as utilized in light electric vehicles have combined efficiencies of only up to about 80%. Additionally, the efficiency may fall off sharply as torque output and/or RPM increases. Thus, range of the light electric vehicle is reduced, due to the power lost to inefficiencies of the system. Additionally, such motors often offer only limited power output in order to maintain efficiency, resulting in reduced performance under demanding loads such as hill climbing.
Yet further, many prior electric motors have offered limited torque density. As used herein, “torque density” refers to Newton-meters of continuous torque produced per kilogram of active electrical and magnetic materials in the motor. In an exemplary embodiment, continuous torque is defined as a level of output torque that produces a maximum (spatial) equilibrium temperature of 100 degrees Celsius in the motor stator, responsive to a load of duty type S1 as defined in International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard 60034-1, given ambient temperature of 25 degrees Celsius and airflow of 8 kilometers per hour around the motor.
For example, many prior electric motors are configured with a torque density of between about 0.5 Newton-meters per kilogram and about 3 Newton-meters per kilogram. Consequently, a motor of sufficient torque and/or power for a particular application may be difficult or even impossible to fit in an available area, for example when a motor sized to produce sufficient torque becomes too massive to fit in a confined space. In the case of e-bikes, the associated space constraints (for example, the limited space available in a bicycle wheel hub) often result in inclusion of comparatively underpowered and/or overweight motors, for example motors having a maximum power output of about 500 to about 900 watts.
In contrast, efficient, compact, and/or torque-dense electric motors, including motors for e-bikes and other LEVs, may be achieved by utilizing a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine configured in accordance with principles of the present disclosure. As used herein, a “transverse flux machine” and/or “commutated flux machine” may be any electrical machine wherein magnetic flux paths have sections where the flux is generally transverse to a rotational plane of the machine. In an exemplary embodiment, when a magnet and/or flux concentrating components are on a rotor and/or are moved as the electrical machine operates, the electrical machine may be a pure “transverse” flux machine. In another exemplary embodiment, when a magnet and/or flux concentrating components are on a stator and/or are held stationary as the electrical machine operates, the electrical machine may be a pure “commutated” flux machine. As is readily apparent, in certain configurations a “transverse flux machine” may be considered to be a “commutated flux machine” by fixing the rotor and moving the stator, and vice versa. Moreover, a coil may be fixed to a stator; alternatively, a coil may be fixed to a rotor.
Moreover, there is a spectrum of functionality and device designs bridging the gap between a commutated flux machine and a transverse flux machine. Certain designs may rightly fall between these two categories, or be considered to belong to both simultaneously. Therefore, as will be apparent to one skilled in the art, in this disclosure a reference to a “transverse flux machine” may be equally applicable to a “commutated flux machine” and vice versa.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, and with reference to
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, and with reference to
Moreover, transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines may be configured in multiple ways. For example, with reference to
With reference now to
With reference now to
Side lamination 412 may be any shape configured to facilitate transmission of magnetic flux in a desired manner and/or direction. In various exemplary embodiments, side lamination 412 comprises a generally ring-shaped structure. Moreover, side lamination 412 may be configured with one or more teeth 416. In an exemplary embodiment, teeth 416 are located on the outer edge of side lamination 412 and/or on the inner edge of side lamination 412. In various exemplary embodiments, teeth 416 may be disposed to generally face the radial interior of the ring (for example, in connection with the use of an “inner” rotor in an axial gap configuration), the radial exterior of the ring (for example, in connection with the use of an “outer” rotor in an axial gap configuration), and/or an axial side of the ring (for example, in connection with the use of a “side by side” rotor in a radial gap configuration).
Teeth 416 are configured as one or more regions configured for switching flux, for example across an air gap in a transverse flux machine. Teeth 416 may be configured with substantially flat outer surfaces having trenches therebetween, for example generally hemispherical trenches. Moreover, teeth 416 may be configured with any suitable shape. Teeth 416 may also be separated from one another by trenches comprising a cylindrical shape, an elliptical shape, a triangular shape, a rectangular shape, a trapezoidal shape, and/or any suitable shape(s).
The center to center distance between adjacent teeth 416 may be any suitable distance. The center to center distance may be the same between teeth 416 in side lamination 412, or the center to center distance between teeth 416 in side lamination 412 may be variable. In various exemplary embodiments, the center to center distance may be a function of a pole pitch in a transverse flux machine. The on-center spacing between adjacent teeth 416 may similarly be varied, for example in order to cause an on-center spacing between certain teeth 416 to align with an on-center spacing between flux concentrating rotor portions in a particular rotor. Moreover, in various exemplary embodiments, on side lamination 412, teeth 416 may be located, spaced, shaped, and/or otherwise configured in accordance with principles of phase offset in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/772,962 filed on May 3, 2010, now U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0169366 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED SYSTEMS HAVING PHASE OFFSET”. In this manner, side laminations 412 may be configured to reduce cogging torque, vibration, and/or other undesirable operational characteristics.
Side lamination 412 typically comprises a material suitable for transmission of magnetic flux. In various exemplary embodiments, side lamination 412 comprises silicon steel. In an exemplary embodiment, side lamination 412 comprises M19 silicon steel. Side lamination 412 may also comprise cold rolled grain oriented (“CRGO”) silicon steel, nickel-based alloys (e.g., Carpenter brand high-permeability “49” alloy and/or the like), cobalt-based alloys (e.g., Carpenter brand “Hiperco” cobalt-based materials and/or the like), nickel-cobalt alloys, and/or the like. Moreover, side lamination 412 may comprise any suitable material having a desired electrical resistivity and/or magnetic permeability.
In an exemplary embodiment, side lamination 412 has a thickness of about 0.35 mm. In another exemplary embodiment, side lamination 412 has a thickness of between about 0.3 mm and about 0.4 mm. In various exemplary embodiments, side lamination 412 has a thickness between about 0.18 mm and about 0.65 mm.
In various exemplary embodiments, side lamination 412 is configured with an electrically insulating coating and/or finish on at least a portion of the exterior of side lamination 412. The insulating coating may comprise any suitable coating configured to provide a desired level of electrical insulation. For example, in one exemplary embodiment side lamination 412 is coated with an oxide finish. In another exemplary embodiment, side lamination 412 is coated with an organic-based varnish. In various exemplary embodiments, side lamination 412 is coated with one or more of oxidized silicon, a “C-5” coating, and/or a polyimide film (e.g., Kapton® brand film and/or the like). Moreover, side lamination 412 may be coated, covered, finished, and/or otherwise at least partially electrically insulated via any suitable method or process, and with any suitable material or combination of materials.
In various exemplary embodiments, with reference now to
Lamination stack 414 may comprise any suitable number of side laminations 412. In an exemplary embodiment, lamination stack 414 comprises three side laminations 412. In another exemplary embodiment, lamination stack 414 comprises ten side laminations 412. In various exemplary embodiments, lamination stack 414 may comprise 17 side laminations 412, 25 side laminations 412, 40 side laminations 412, and/or more side laminations 412. Moreover, lamination stack 414 may comprise a number of side laminations 412 selected based at least in part on a desired thickness of lamination stack 414, the thickness of one or more side laminations 412, a space available in an electrical machine, and/or the like.
With reference now to
By providing electrically insulating material on the exterior of side lamination 412, lamination stack 414 may be configured with very high electrical resistivity between layers, reducing unwanted currents between layers and thus reducing associated losses.
However, when utilized in certain electrical machines, continuous (for example, ring-shaped) side laminations 412 and/or lamination stacks 414 can suffer from undesirable losses due to flux linking of certain side laminations 412 as explained in more detail below. Stated generally, in certain electrical machines, including in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines, any component or combination of components which provide a closed electrical circuit passing through a magnetic flux loop will have an electric current induced therein responsive to variations in the magnetic field. Typically, it is desirable to induce an electrical current in a conductive coil of an electrical machine (i.e. a portion of the electrical machine intended to supply an output current and/or provide an input current), but undesirable to induce an electrical current in other portions of the machine (e.g., portions of the rotor and/or stator intended to facilitate switching of magnetic flux). Such currents induced outside a conductive coil can lead to unwanted eddy currents, thermal losses, and even device failure.
For example, returning to
Turning now to
For ease of illustration, lamination stack 414 as illustrated in
In various exemplary embodiments, a varying magnetic field is provided by rotor 450. Rotor 450 comprises one or more portions having a first magnetic polarity (for example, rotor portion 451), and one or more portions having the opposite magnetic polarity (for example, rotor portion 452). Rotor 450 may comprise various permanent magnets, electromagnets, flux concentrators, and/or the like, as desired.
As illustrated in
Similarly, a certain amount of flux takes flux path P2 out of rotor 450, across the air gap to tooth 416L and into side lamination 412-L2, down through side lamination 412-L2 into back return lamination 418, through back return lamination 418 into side lamination 412-R2, up through side lamination 412-R2, out of tooth 416R, and across the air gap into rotor 450.
Likewise, a certain amount of flux takes flux path P3 out of rotor 450, across the air gap to tooth 416L and into side lamination 412-L3, down through side lamination 412-L3 into back return lamination 418, through back return lamination 418 into side lamination 412-R3, up through side lamination 412-R3, out of tooth 416R and across the air gap into rotor 450.
Flux taking path P1 links side laminations 412-L2, 412-L3, 412-R2, and 412-R3, as these side laminations 412 are inside the flux loop defined by path P1. Similarly, flux taking path P2 links side laminations 412-L3 and 412-R3. Because flux path P3 is the innermost path, flux taking path P3 does not link any side laminations 412 exterior to flux path P3. Stated generally, flux passing through a particular side lamination 412 links all other side laminations 412 that are “inside” (i.e., closer to coil 420) that particular side lamination 412.
Moreover, the voltage induced in a particular side lamination 412 as a result of flux linking varies depending on the position of that side lamination 412 in lamination stack 414. For example, innermost side laminations 412-L3 and 412-R3 are linked by flux passing through all other side laminations 412, so the voltage induced in side laminations 412-L3 and 412-R3 is higher than in other side laminations 412. The voltage induced in a particular side lamination 412 decreases as the position of side lamination 412 moves outward in lamination stack 414. At the edge of lamination stack 414, side laminations 412-L1 and 412-L2 are linked by no other side laminations 412, so the voltage in side laminations 412-L1 and 412-L2 are lower than in other side laminations 412.
Voltages induced in side laminations 412 may vary based upon a voltage constant of a transverse flux machine, an RPM of a transverse flux machine, the number of poles in a transverse flux machine, and/or the like. In an exemplary embodiment, a voltage of approximately 1 volt AC is induced in the innermost side lamination 412 when rotor 450 rotates at about 300 RPM. In other exemplary embodiments, a voltage of between about 0.5 volts AC and about 2 volts AC is induced in the innermost side lamination 412 when rotor 450 rotates at about 300 RPM.
Moreover, the voltage induced in a particular side lamination 412 in a lamination stack may vary in a generally stepwise linear fashion based on the position of side lamination 412 in the lamination stack. Stated another way, for example, when a voltage of about 1 volt is induced in an innermost side lamination 412, and a voltage of about 0 volts is induced in an outermost side lamination 412, a voltage of about 0.5 volts is induced in a side lamination 412 located halfway between the inner and outer edges of lamination stack 414.
Moreover, because differing voltages are induced in different side laminations 412 in lamination stack 414 responsive to rotation of rotor 450, a voltage exists between adjacent side laminations 412 in lamination stack 414. For example, in a lamination stack 414 comprising 20 side laminations 412, when a voltage of about 1 volt is induced in an innermost side lamination 412, and a voltage of about 0 volts is induced in an outermost side lamination 412, adjacent side laminations 412 may have a voltage therebetween of about 0.05 volts (i.e., about one-twentieth of the voltage difference between the innermost side lamination 412 and the outermost side lamination 412). Such voltages induced in side laminations 412 may be high enough to generate appreciable currents between side laminations 412 in lamination stack 414, despite the presence of insulating material.
In an exemplary embodiment, losses associated with voltages induced in side laminations 412 may result in about 2 Newton-meters of effective drag at 100 RPM. In another exemplary embodiment, losses associated with voltages induced in side laminations 412 may exceed 50 watts at 100 RPM. In various exemplary embodiments, losses associated with voltages induced in side laminations 412 may comprise between about 10% to about 70% of all losses in a particular transverse flux machine, for example transverse flux machine 400.
Turning now to
In various exemplary embodiments multiple cuts 513 may be made in side lamination 512. In an exemplary embodiment, side lamination 512 is configured with 2 cuts 513. In another exemplary embodiment, side lamination 512 is configured with 10 cuts 513. Side lamination 512 may be configured with 3 cuts, 12 cuts, 25 cuts, and/or any other suitable number of cuts, as desired. Considered another way, a generally ring-shaped structure in a transverse flux machine may be considered to be made up of a plurality of side lamination 512 as “segments” or portions thereof, each least partially electrically and/or physically separated from one another by one or more cuts 513. Stated generally, while the word “cut” is often used herein, it will be appreciated that various approaches for forming gaps, voids, spaces, segments, and/or the like are all contemplated in accordance with principles of the present disclosure.
Similarly, with reference now to
In an exemplary embodiment, creation of a single cut 513 in a lamination stack 514 reduced losses associated with that lamination stack 514 by about 50% (compared to a lamination stack 514 lacking a cut 513) when the cut lamination stack 514 was utilized in a transverse flux machine. In another exemplary embodiment, creation of a single cut 513 in a lamination stack 514 reduced losses associated with that lamination stack 514 by about 70% (compared to a lamination stack 514 lacking a cut 513) when utilized in a transverse flux machine. In various exemplary embodiments, creation of a single cut 513 in a lamination stack 514 reduced losses associated with that lamination stack 514 by between about 10% and about 90% (compared to a lamination stack 514 lacking a cut 513) when utilized in a transverse flux machine. Moreover, the effect of a single cut 513 varies with the effectiveness of electrically insulating material on the exterior of side laminations 512. In general, the more effective the insulator, the more losses are reduced by a single cut. Generally stated, a larger number of cuts 513 more effectively interrupt electrical paths around lamination stack 514; however, as the number of cuts 513 grows, the complexity associated with manufacturing lamination stacks 514 and/or integrating cut laminations stacks 514 into a functional electrical machine may also grow. Additionally, as the number of cuts grows, the voltages induced in side laminations 512 of lamination stacks 514 are reduced, as lamination stack 514 extends a shorter angular distance around a transverse flux machine and is thus linked by less magnetic flux.
In various exemplary embodiments, a side lamination 512 and/or lamination stack 514 may be formed from oriented materials. Stated generally, the shorter angular distance a particular side lamination 512 and/or lamination stack 514 extends around a transverse flux machine, the greater the benefit in using oriented materials in that side lamination 512 and/or lamination stack 514. This can be seen due to the fact that as a side lamination 512 and/or lamination stack 514 extends a shorter angular distance, flux in that side lamination 512 and/or lamination stack 514 can travel more closely in a single direction (e.g., a radial direction), which can be configured to be generally parallel to the grain of the oriented material.
For example, with reference now to
In an exemplary embodiment, oriented materials are utilized in lamination stack 514 when lamination stack 514 extends an angular distance of up to about 60 degrees around a transverse flux machine. Stated another way, oriented materials are utilized in lamination stack 514 when six or more similarly sized lamination stacks 514 are utilized to form a generally ring-shaped structure in a transverse flux machine. In another exemplary embodiment, oriented materials are utilized in lamination stack 514 when lamination stack 514 extends an angular distance of up to about 30 degrees around a transverse flux machine. In various exemplary embodiments, oriented materials are utilized in lamination stack 514 when lamination stack 514 extends an angular distance of between about 10 degrees and about 60 degrees around a transverse flux machine. Moreover, oriented materials may be utilized in any suitable configuration of lamination stack 514.
In various exemplary embodiments, oriented materials are utilized in lamination stacks 514 such that the orientation direction near the middle of a lamination stack 514 is generally parallel to the radial direction. Stated another way, in various exemplary embodiments, lamination stacks 514 are configured to reduce the degree to which flux flow in lamination stacks 514 is out of alignment with the grain orientation. For example, in an exemplary embodiment wherein lamination stack 514 extends an angular distance of about 60 degrees around a transverse flux machine, and wherein the grain orientation is about parallel to the radial direction at about the middle of lamination stack 514, flux flow in lamination stack 514 is thus within about +/−30 degrees of the grain orientation. In various exemplary embodiments, lamination stack 514 is configured such that the grain orientation in lamination stack 514 is never more than 30 degrees out of alignment with the radial direction. In other exemplary embodiments, lamination stack 514 is configured such that the grain orientation in lamination stack 514 is never more than 15 degrees out of alignment with the radial direction. Moreover, lamination stack 514 may be configured to cause the grain orientation to be within any suitable specified number of degrees of the radial direction, as desired.
In an exemplary embodiment, with reference now to
Cuts and/or segmentation in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured to provide electrical separation while also providing and/or maintaining desirable mechanical properties. Turning now to
Moreover, multiple cuts 615 may be made. In an exemplary embodiment, one ring-shaped side lamination 612 may be divided into ten side laminations 612 via ten cuts 615. The ten resulting side laminations 612 may be interlocked with one another to form a generally ring-shaped structure. The ring-shaped structure may be dimensionally similar to a ring-shaped side lamination 612 lacking cuts 615. Stated another way, multiple side laminations 612 configured with cuts 615 may be used in place of a single ring-shaped side lamination 612 lacking a cut 615. As will be appreciated, side laminations 612 may also be individually formed via stamping, die cutting, laser cutting, water jet cutting, electrical discharge machining, and/or the like, and examples provided herein are by way of illustration and not of limitation.
Similarly, a lamination stack 614 may be configured with one or more cuts 615 therethrough. Lamination stack 614 may be formed as a continuous ring, and then cuts 615 may be made therein. Alternatively, a lamination stack 614 may be formed from side laminations 615 which were pre-cut or otherwise pre-shaped or configured prior to forming lamination stack 614. Multiple lamination stacks 614 may be interlocked with one another to form a generally ring-shaped structure.
In various exemplary embodiments, cuts 615 may be configured to interlock portions of adjacent lamination stacks 614, for example as illustrated in
In an exemplary embodiment, portions of cuts 615 in lamination stack 614 define generally “female” portions of lamination stack 614. A non-magnetic coupling component, for example a “double dovetail”-like insert 617 configured with two “male” portions, may then be coupled to the corresponding female portions of adjacent lamination stacks 614 order to couple adjacent lamination stacks 614. It will be appreciated that the respective location of male and female portions on lamination stack 614 and inserts 617 may also be reversed, as suitable. While a dovetail-like interlocking is illustrated in
Multiple lamination stacks 614 may be coupled together via the use of various non-magnetic coupling components such as inserts 617, for example in order to form a generally ring-shaped structure. Stated generally, cuts 615 may be configured to provide features for mechanical connection between lamination stacks 614, and/or between lamination stacks 614 and other components of a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine, for example inserts 617.
Turning now to
By configuring side laminations 612 in an at least partially offset and/or overlapping manner between layers, side laminations 612 in adjacent layers may each be least partially electrically and/or physically separated and/or insulated from one another. This reduces electrical currents induced in side laminations 612, for example responsive to switching of magnetic flux around side laminations 612.
In various exemplary embodiments, side laminations 612 in adjacent layers may be disposed with an offset of approximately one-half of the width of a single side lamination 612 (e.g., in a manner similar to a “stretcher bond” brickwork pattern). In other exemplary embodiments, side laminations 612 in adjacent layers may be disposed with an offset of between about 10% and about 49% of the width of a single side lamination 612 (e.g., in a manner similar to a “raking stretcher bond” brickwork pattern). Moreover, any suitable offset may be utilized.
In various exemplary embodiments, side laminations 612 in adjacent layers have identical shapes. In other exemplary embodiments, side laminations 612 in adjacent layers differ in shape from one another. In this manner, side laminations 612 may be offset from one another, as desired, while still causing teeth 616 in side laminations 612 in adjacent layers to align with one another to form a flux switch.
Moreover, in various exemplary embodiments, multiple layers of side laminations 612 may be stacked together to form a lamination stack 614, and thereafter teeth 616 may be formed on lamination stack 614 (for example via embossing, laser cutting, and/or any other suitable technique, machinery, or procedure). In these exemplary embodiments, improved manufacturability of teeth 616 is facilitated, as the need to precisely align side laminations 612 (and corresponding previously formed teeth 616) in successive layers is reduced and/or eliminated. Rather, multiple layers of side laminations 612 may be roughly aligned and/or coupled to one another, and then teeth 616 may be precisely formed and located via embossing and/or cutting of multiple layers of side laminations 612 simultaneously.
Any suitable number of layers of side laminations 612 may be utilized to form a structure. In an exemplary embodiment, multiple layers of side laminations 612 are utilized to form a lamination stack 614, for example a lamination stack 614 having a generally ring-shaped structure. In an exemplary embodiment, 8 layers of side laminations 612 are utilized (for example, as illustrated in
By utilizing a stator comprising one or more “cut” or “segmented” lamination stacks, for example lamination stacks 514, 614, and/or the like, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured to achieve higher output torque, higher efficiency, lower temperature operation, reduced thermal losses, reduced eddy currents, and/or other similar operational improvements. Additionally, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured with improved manufacturability, improved mechanical and/or structural properties, and/or the like.
In addition to principles of segmented side laminations in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines, principles of the present disclosure contemplate use of laminated materials as “back iron”. In these configurations, laminated materials provide magnetic flux paths from one side of a stator to another, generally on the “back” side of the stator (e.g., the side of the stator opposite the rotor). For example, laminated materials may be utilized to provide flux paths from a lamination stack on a first side of a stator to a lamination stack on an opposing side of a stator. Moreover, in addition to laminated materials, principles of the present disclosure contemplate the use of powdered metal and/or other suitable magnetic material as “back iron”.
Turning now to
Back return lamination 718 is sized and/or shaped to extend at least partway in an axial direction in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine. In an exemplary embodiment, back return lamination 718 comprises a generally rectangular shape having a length of about 62 mm, a width of about 6.5 mm, and a thickness of about 0.35 mm. In various exemplary embodiments, back return lamination 718 is configured with a length of between about 20 mm and about 120 mm, a width of between about 2.5 mm and about 15 mm, and a thickness of between about 0.18 mm and about 0.65 mm. Moreover, back return lamination 718 may be configured with any suitable dimensions and/or geometries, for example depending on the size of a particular transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine.
In various exemplary embodiments, with momentary reference to
Holes 719 may be generally triangular, rectangular, circular, oval, irregular, and/or any other suitable shape. Holes 719 may be configured to reduce the mass of a particular electrical machine; moreover, holes 719 may also be configured to reduce, guide, and/or modify flux sharing between phases of a polyphase transverse flux machine as discussed below.
In various exemplary embodiments, with reference now to
In an exemplary transverse flux machine having a rotor interior to a stator, the “rainbow” of back return laminations 718 may be disposed generally toward the outside of the transverse flux machine (i.e., generally on the opposite side of the stator from the rotor). In another exemplary transverse flux machine having a rotor exterior to a stator, the “rainbow” of back return laminations 718 may be disposed generally toward the inside of the transverse flux machine (again, generally on the opposite side of the stator from the rotor).
Any suitable number of back return laminations 718 may be arranged in a rainbow configuration. In an exemplary embodiment, a particular transverse flux machine is configured with 200 back return laminations 718 in a rainbow configuration. In another exemplary embodiment, a transverse flux machine is configured with 150 back return laminations 718 in a rainbow configuration. In various exemplary embodiments, a transverse flux machine is configured with between about 50 back return laminations 718 and about 500 back return laminations 718 in a rainbow configuration.
In various exemplary embodiments, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may comprise a rainbow of back return laminations 718 made from differing materials. For example, back return laminations 718 made from a first material may be interleaved with back return laminations 718 made from a second material. In this manner, improved mechanical, electrical, thermal, and/or magnetic characteristics and/or performance may be achieved.
For example, back return laminations 718 having a highly insulated coating may be interleaved with back return laminations 718 having a less electrically insulating and/or less expensive coating. Overall, the combined back return laminations 718 may thus achieve similar electrically insulative properties at a potentially reduced cost.
In another example, back return laminations 718 having a first set of magnetic characteristics may be interleaved with back return laminations 718 having a second set of magnetic characteristics. In this manner, the combined back return laminations 718 may achieve improved high-frequency flux switching performance, reduced hysteresis losses, and/or the like.
Turning now to
With reference now to
In various exemplary embodiments, when a dual wound coil is utilized in polyphase stator assembly 710, for example as illustrated in
Additional details regarding principles of dual wound coils and low resistance coils are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/291,385 filed on Nov. 8, 2011 and entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM COIL CONCEPTS”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
In various exemplary embodiments, back return laminations 718 comprise laminated and/or generally planar materials. In other exemplary embodiments, back return laminations 718 may comprise powdered metal, metallic glasses, and/or the like. In certain exemplary embodiments, back return laminations 718 may be configured as one or more portions of powdered metal forming a generally rainbow-like shape. Stated differently, one or more back return laminations 718 may be considered to be functionally similar to and/or interchangeable with a powdered metal component having a similar shape (or shape approximating that of a group of back return laminations 718). It will be appreciated that any suitable shape extending at least partially in an axial direction may be utilized, for example in order to provide a back return path for magnetic flux in a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine.
Principles of the present disclosure may be applied in single-phase electrical machines, dual-phase electrical machines, and/or electrical machines having three or more phases. Turning now to
In an exemplary embodiment, stator phases 810A, 810B, and 810C are configured to be about 120 degrees out of phase from one another. In other exemplary embodiments, stator phases 810A, 810B, and 810C may be configured with phase offsets greater than and/or less than 120 degrees. In an exemplary embodiment, stator phases 810A, 810B, and 810C are about in phase with one another.
When operated as a generator, stator assembly 810 interfaces with a rotor driven by an external force, causing magnetic flux to be conducted around coils 820A, 820B, and 820C, and thus inducing a current in coils 820A, 820B, and 820C. When stator assembly 810 is operated as a motor, an input current is provided to coils 820A, 820B, and 820C, resulting in movement of a coupled rotor.
In certain exemplary embodiments, with reference now to
In certain exemplary embodiments, flux sharing may be reduced by increasing the spacing between stator phases, for example by providing a gap of between about 0.05 mm and about 2 mm between stator phases along the rotational axis. Additionally, flux sharing may be reduced by configuring stator phases 810A, 810B, and 810C to differ in phase from one another, for example differing in phase by about 120 degrees. Flux sharing may also be reduced by modifying the size and/or configuration of holes 719 in back return laminations 718, for example by reducing the volume of back return laminations 718 located generally near the border of stator phases 810A, 810B, and 810C.
Yet further, flux sharing may be reduced by configuring back return laminations 718 as multiple pieces of generally planar material stacked end to end, with portions of material having a low magnetic permeability therebetween. The portions of low magnetic permeability may be configured to generally align with the edges of stator phases 810A, 810B, and 810C. In this manner, magnetic flux may be hindered from flowing between stator phases 810A, 810B, and 810C through back return laminations 718.
In various exemplary embodiments, flux sharing may be increased by decreasing the spacing between stator phases, for example by placing stator phases within about 1.5 mm of one another along the rotational axis. Flux sharing may also be increased by aligning stator phases 810A, 810B, and/or 810C more closely in phase with one another, and/or by providing sufficient volume of back return laminations 718 located generally near the border of stator phases 810A, 810B, and 810C.
In various exemplary embodiments, stator phases 810A, 810B, and/or 810C may be at least partially electrically and/or magnetically insulated and/or isolated from one another. For example, an electrically insulating coating, film, sheet, or other suitable material may be disposed between stator phases 810A and 810B and between stator phases 810B and 810C. In this manner, resistive and other losses in polyphase stator assembly 810 can be further reduced. Moreover, stator phases 810A, 810B, and/or 810C may be physically spaced apart and/or separated from one another. The spacing may be accomplished by disposing an insulating material between stator phases, for example as disclosed above; alternatively, the spacing may be implemented simply as an air gap. In various exemplary embodiments, the spacing between adjacent stator phases in polyphase stator assembly 810 (for example, stator phase 810-A and 810B) may be a distance of between about 0.002 inches (0.05 mm) and about 0.0787 inches (2 mm).
In various exemplary embodiments, teeth 816 in stator phases 810A, 810B, and/or 810C are configured to modify, control, and/or otherwise configure the timing of flux switching in an electrical machine. For example, teeth 816 in stator phases 810A, 810B, and/or 810C may be configured to implement a phase offset, for example a sixth phase offset. In an exemplary embodiment, teeth 816 on the right side of stator phase 810C (i.e., teeth 816C-R) and/or teeth 816 on the left side of stator phase 810C (i.e., teeth 816C-L) are configured to implement a sixth phase offset over the circumference of stator phase 810C. In another exemplary embodiment, teeth 816C-R and/or 816C-L are configured to implement a double sixth phase offset over the circumference of stator phase 810C.
In various exemplary embodiments, teeth 816 on one lamination stack 814 are configured to implement a sixth phase offset. In other exemplary embodiments, teeth 816 on a lamination stack 814 are configured to implement a sixth phase offset when two such lamination stacks 814 are coupled together. Stated another way, in these exemplary embodiments a sixth phase offset is distributed across the teeth 816 of two lamination stacks 814. Moreover, a sixth phase offset may be implemented in and/or distributed across three lamination stacks 814, four laminations stacks 814, and/or any suitable number of lamination stacks 814 or any suitable portion of stator assembly 810, as desired. Additional details regarding principles of phase offset in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/772,962 filed on May 3, 2010, now U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0169366 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED SYSTEMS HAVING PHASE OFFSET”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
With reference now to
In an exemplary embodiment, turning to
Electrical machines configured in accordance with principles of the present disclosure may be configured to operate at any suitable voltage and/or voltages. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate at a voltage of about 24 volts in each of coils 820A, 820B, and 820C. In another exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate at a voltage of about 48 volts in each of coils 820A, 820B, and 820C. In another exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate at a voltage of about 160 volts in each of coils 820A, 820B, and 820C. In another exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate at a voltage of about 600 volts in each of coils 820A, 820B, and 820C. Moreover, transverse flux machine 800 may be configured to operate at any suitable voltage and/or voltages, as desired.
Electrical machines configured in accordance with principles of the present disclosure may be configured to operate in connection with any suitable controller and/or controllers. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate in connection with a pulse width modulation (PWM) controller. In various exemplary embodiments, transverse flux machine 800 is configured to operate in connection with a sinusoidal drive, a trapezoidal drive, and/or the like. Moreover, transverse flux machine 800 may be configured to operate in connection with field-oriented control, block commutation, and/or the like.
Principles of the present disclosure may suitably be combined with various other principles related to transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines. For example, principles of the present disclosure may suitably be combined with principles for stators in transverse flux machines and commutated flux machines, for example principles for partial stators and/or gapped stators, as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/611,728 filed on Nov. 3, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,851,965 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM STATOR CONCEPTS”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles for rotors in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines, for example tape wound rotors and/or multipath rotors, as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/611,733 filed on Nov. 3, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,923,886 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM ROTOR CONCEPTS”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of polyphase transverse flux machines and/or polyphase commutated flux machines as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/611,737 filed on Nov. 3, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,868,508 entitled “POLYPHASE TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of extended magnets, overhung rotors, and/or stator tooth overlap in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/772,958 filed on May 3, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,053,944 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS CONFIGURED TO PROVIDE REDUCED FLUX LEAKAGE, HYSTERESIS LOSS REDUCTION, AND PHASE MATCHING”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of utilization of transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines in electric bicycles as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/772,959 filed on May 3, 2010, now U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0169381 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS FOR ELECTRIC BICYCLES”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of phase offset in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/772,962 filed on May 3, 2010, now U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0169366 entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED SYSTEMS HAVING PHASE OFFSET”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of coils, including dual wound coils in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/291,385 filed on Nov. 8, 2011 and entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM COIL CONCEPTS”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of laminations combined with powdered metal portions in transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/291,392 filed on Nov. 8, 2011 and entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEMS HAVING LAMINATED AND POWDERED METAL PORTIONS”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of isolated torque sensing systems as disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/453,000 filed Mar. 15, 2011 entitled “ISOLATED TORQUE SENSOR”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles of adjustable Hall effect sensor systems as disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/453,006 filed Mar. 15, 2011 and entitled “ADJUSTABLE HALL EFFECT SENSOR SYSTEM”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Moreover, principles of the present disclosure may suitably be combined with any number of principles disclosed in any one of and/or all of the U.S. Patents and/or patent applications incorporated by reference herein. Thus, for example, a particular transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may incorporate use of segmented stator laminations, use of rainbow-like back return laminations, use of a dual wound coil, use of a lamination stack with powdered metal teeth, use of a sixth-phase offset, use of extended magnets, use of an overhung rotor, use of stator tooth overlap, use of a tape wound rotor, use of a multipath rotor, use of a partial stator, use of a polyphase design, and/or the like. All such combinations, permutations, and/or other interrelationships are considered to be within the scope of the present disclosure.
While the principles of this disclosure have been shown in various embodiments, many modifications of structure, arrangements, proportions, the elements, materials and components, used in practice, which are particularly adapted for a specific environment and operating requirements may be used without departing from the principles and scope of this disclosure. These and other changes or modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure and may be expressed in the following claims.
The present disclosure has been described with reference to various embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the specification is to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. Likewise, benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to various embodiments. However, benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Also, as used herein, the terms “coupled,” “coupling,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a physical connection, an electrical connection, a magnetic connection, an optical connection, a communicative connection, a functional connection, and/or any other connection. When language similar to “at least one of A, B, or C” is used in the claims, the phrase is intended to mean any of the following: (1) at least one of A; (2) at least one of B; (3) at least one of C; (4) at least one of A and at least one of B; (5) at least one of B and at least one of C; (6) at least one of A and at least one of C; or (7) at least one of A, at least one of B, and at least one of C.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1361136 | Burke | Dec 1920 | A |
1809197 | Fendrich, Jr. | Jun 1931 | A |
2078668 | Kilgore | Apr 1937 | A |
2122307 | Welch | Jun 1938 | A |
3403273 | Higuchi | Sep 1968 | A |
3437854 | Oiso | Apr 1969 | A |
3558941 | Visconti Brebbia et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3700942 | Alth | Oct 1972 | A |
3710158 | Bachle et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3774059 | Cox | Nov 1973 | A |
3869625 | Sawyer | Mar 1975 | A |
3984711 | Kordik | Oct 1976 | A |
3999107 | Reuting | Dec 1976 | A |
4021691 | Dukshtau et al. | May 1977 | A |
4114057 | Esters | Sep 1978 | A |
4127802 | Johnson | Nov 1978 | A |
4206374 | Goddijn | Jun 1980 | A |
4237396 | Blenkinsop et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4237397 | Mohr et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4255684 | Mischler et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4255696 | Field, II | Mar 1981 | A |
4286180 | Langley | Aug 1981 | A |
4306164 | Itoh et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4339875 | Muller | Jul 1982 | A |
4363988 | Kliman | Dec 1982 | A |
4388545 | Honsinger et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4392072 | Rosenberry | Jul 1983 | A |
4459501 | Fawzy | Jul 1984 | A |
4501980 | Welburn | Feb 1985 | A |
4508984 | Guedj | Apr 1985 | A |
4605874 | Whiteley | Aug 1986 | A |
4611139 | Godkin et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4620752 | Fremerey et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4639626 | McGee | Jan 1987 | A |
4658166 | Oudet | Apr 1987 | A |
4704555 | Stokes | Nov 1987 | A |
4794286 | Taenzer | Dec 1988 | A |
4797602 | West | Jan 1989 | A |
4801834 | Stokes | Jan 1989 | A |
4835840 | Stokes | Jun 1989 | A |
4850100 | Stokes | Jul 1989 | A |
4857786 | Nihei et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4883999 | Hendershot | Nov 1989 | A |
4899072 | Ohta | Feb 1990 | A |
4900965 | Fisher | Feb 1990 | A |
4959577 | Radomski | Sep 1990 | A |
4990812 | Nam | Feb 1991 | A |
5015903 | Hancock | May 1991 | A |
5038066 | Pawlak et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5051641 | Weh | Sep 1991 | A |
5062012 | Maeda et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5097167 | Kanayama et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5117142 | von Zweygbergk | May 1992 | A |
5130595 | Arora | Jul 1992 | A |
5132581 | Kusase | Jul 1992 | A |
5177054 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5195231 | Fanning et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5208503 | Hisey | May 1993 | A |
5212419 | Fisher et al. | May 1993 | A |
5214333 | Kawamura | May 1993 | A |
5250865 | Meeks | Oct 1993 | A |
5262746 | Masuda | Nov 1993 | A |
5278470 | Neag | Jan 1994 | A |
5289072 | Lange | Feb 1994 | A |
5306977 | Hayashi | Apr 1994 | A |
5338996 | Yamamoto | Aug 1994 | A |
5370200 | Takata | Dec 1994 | A |
5382859 | Huang et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386166 | Reimer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5474148 | Takata | Dec 1995 | A |
5477841 | Trost et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5485072 | Fehringer | Jan 1996 | A |
5530308 | Fanning et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5543674 | Koehler | Aug 1996 | A |
5543677 | Fakler | Aug 1996 | A |
5633551 | Weh | May 1997 | A |
5650680 | Chula | Jul 1997 | A |
5696419 | Rakestraw et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712521 | Detela | Jan 1998 | A |
5717262 | Muller et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5723921 | Sugiura | Mar 1998 | A |
5726514 | Wurz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729065 | Fremery et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731649 | Caamano | Mar 1998 | A |
5773910 | Lange | Jun 1998 | A |
5777418 | Lange et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5780953 | Umeda et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5814907 | Bandera | Sep 1998 | A |
5839530 | Dietzel | Nov 1998 | A |
5879265 | Bek | Mar 1999 | A |
5886449 | Mitcham | Mar 1999 | A |
5889348 | Muhlberger et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894183 | Borchert | Apr 1999 | A |
5909339 | Hong | Jun 1999 | A |
5925965 | Li et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942828 | Hill | Aug 1999 | A |
5954779 | Dietzel | Sep 1999 | A |
5973436 | Mitcham | Oct 1999 | A |
5994802 | Shichijyo et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994814 | Kawabata | Nov 1999 | A |
6028377 | Sakamoto | Feb 2000 | A |
6043579 | Hill | Mar 2000 | A |
6060810 | Lee et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066906 | Kalsi | May 2000 | A |
6097118 | Hull | Aug 2000 | A |
6097126 | Takura | Aug 2000 | A |
6118663 | Fan | Sep 2000 | A |
6121712 | Sakamoto | Sep 2000 | A |
6133655 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133664 | Torok et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133669 | Tupper | Oct 2000 | A |
6137202 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154013 | Caamano | Nov 2000 | A |
6163097 | Smith et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175177 | Sabinski et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177748 | Katcher et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181035 | Acquaviva | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194799 | Miekka et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6215616 | Phan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229238 | Graef | May 2001 | B1 |
6232693 | Gierer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236131 | Schafer | May 2001 | B1 |
6246561 | Flynn | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6276479 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278216 | Li | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288467 | Lange et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300702 | Jack et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304010 | Sugiura | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6333582 | Asao | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342746 | Flynn | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6365999 | Muhlberger et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6445105 | Kliman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448687 | Higashino et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6455970 | Shafer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6472792 | Jack et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6492758 | Gianni et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508321 | Mueller | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6545382 | Bennett | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6603060 | Ohashi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603237 | Caamano | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629574 | Turner | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6657329 | Kastinger et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664704 | Calley | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6700271 | Detela | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707208 | Durham et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717297 | Sadarangani et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6750582 | Neet | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765321 | Sakamoto | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774512 | Takagi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6791225 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794791 | Ben Ahmed et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806602 | Hilzinger | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815863 | Jack et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6835941 | Tanaka | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6841908 | Hasegawa | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847135 | Kastinger et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849985 | Jack et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853112 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866111 | Dube | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6867530 | Gamm et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879080 | Caamano | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882066 | Kastinger | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882077 | Neet | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885124 | Neet | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885129 | Oohashi et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888272 | Kastinger | May 2005 | B2 |
6924576 | Zierer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6924579 | Calley | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940197 | Fujita et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949855 | Dubois et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952068 | Gieras | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960860 | DeCristofaro | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6960862 | Hill | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979925 | Schwamm | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6989622 | Chen et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7015603 | Barrho et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7026737 | Angerer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030529 | Dommsch et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030534 | Caamano | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034425 | Detela | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7064469 | Jack et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067954 | Kuribayashi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071593 | Matsushita et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7124495 | Gieras | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126313 | Dooley | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129602 | Lange et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135802 | Seki et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7208856 | Imai et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211922 | Isoda et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7216732 | Angerer | May 2007 | B2 |
7230361 | Hirzel | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242118 | Sakamoto | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245055 | Jack | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250704 | Sortore et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7259483 | Komiya et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261186 | Deplazes | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265472 | Mitcham | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7268456 | Harada et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275844 | Watanabe | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279820 | Grundl et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7358639 | Caamano | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7385329 | Hill | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7385330 | Trzynadlowski et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7420312 | Kitamura et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7466057 | Imai et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7474030 | Mitcham | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7560840 | Lange | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568714 | Sasnowski et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579742 | Rittenhouse | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7585258 | Watson et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7592735 | Hamada | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602095 | Kusase | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7626308 | Kang | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7638919 | Pulnikov et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7679253 | Neet | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7719156 | Muehlberger | May 2010 | B2 |
7800275 | Calley | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7816830 | Dickes | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7851965 | Calley | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859141 | Sadarangani | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863797 | Calley | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7868508 | Calley et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7868511 | Calley | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7876019 | Calley | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7923886 | Calley et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7952252 | Kang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7973446 | Calley et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20010001528 | Ragaly | May 2001 | A1 |
20010030479 | Mohler | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030486 | Pijanowski | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030487 | Higashino | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020070627 | Ward et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020113520 | Kastinger et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020135242 | Kawai | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020171315 | Kastinger | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190585 | Sakamoto | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030048018 | Sadarangani | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030102751 | Bryant | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030122439 | Horst | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030122440 | Horst | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030122442 | Jack et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040027021 | Karrelmeyer | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036370 | Hilzinger | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046478 | Zierer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061396 | Narita et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040140730 | Barrho et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040145269 | Barrho et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150288 | Calley | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040189138 | Jack | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191519 | Kejzelman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207281 | Detela | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207283 | Oohashi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212267 | Jack et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040222706 | Ickinger | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232793 | Fujita et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232799 | Chen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239207 | Kloepzig et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251759 | Hirzel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251761 | Hirzel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262105 | Li et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006978 | Bradfield | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050012427 | Seki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050029879 | Endo | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050062348 | Ohnishi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062352 | Kastinger | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088056 | Kuribayashi | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050121983 | Ehrhart | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139038 | Kjellen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156479 | Fujita et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156480 | Imai | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050212381 | Gilmour et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242679 | Walter et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060012259 | Kerlin | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060012263 | Smith et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060055280 | Isoda | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060082237 | Kerlin | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087180 | Woo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060091755 | Carlisle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060131974 | Sadarangani et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060131986 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060186754 | Kitamura et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060192453 | Gieras et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060220477 | Okumoto et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261688 | Akita et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070013253 | Dubois et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070046137 | Ooiwa | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070046139 | Ishizuka | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075605 | Enomoto et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070138900 | Imai et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152528 | Kang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070176505 | Trzynadlowski et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188037 | Lau | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080007126 | Popov et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080042507 | Edelson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080169776 | Acker | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179982 | Kramer | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080211326 | Kang et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080211336 | Sadarangani | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238237 | Nishihama et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080246362 | Hirzel | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080265707 | Bradfield | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080309188 | Calley | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080315700 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090021099 | Shkondin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026853 | Groening | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026866 | Groening et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090042051 | Skarman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090085415 | Ionel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090127942 | Rahman et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090152489 | Kjellen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090206693 | Calley et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090208771 | Janecek | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090243406 | Jack et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090255924 | Lovens | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284253 | Finkler et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295237 | Gloor | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322165 | Rittenhouse | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013341 | Vollmer | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100013343 | Bi | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100015432 | Bergmark et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026135 | Hussey | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038580 | Ye et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052467 | Gieras | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110025140 | Pennander et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110025141 | Nord et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110037329 | Nord et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050010 | Calley et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062723 | Calley et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110133485 | Gieras | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169357 | Gieras | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1513856 | Apr 1969 | DE |
3626149 | Aug 1986 | DE |
3602687 | Aug 1987 | DE |
8711725 | Aug 1987 | DE |
3904516 | Jun 1990 | DE |
3927453 | Feb 1991 | DE |
4132340 | Mar 1993 | DE |
19639670 | Apr 1998 | DE |
19634949 | May 1998 | DE |
19650572 | Jun 1998 | DE |
19753261 | Jun 1998 | DE |
19753320 | Jun 1998 | DE |
199650697 | Jun 1998 | DE |
19704392 | Aug 1998 | DE |
19743906 | Apr 1999 | DE |
19960737 | Jul 2001 | DE |
10047675 | Apr 2002 | DE |
10053265 | May 2002 | DE |
10062073 | Jun 2002 | DE |
10128646 | Jan 2003 | DE |
10130702 | Jan 2003 | DE |
10145820 | Apr 2003 | DE |
102006026719 | Jun 2006 | DE |
102005020952 | Nov 2006 | DE |
102006048561 | Apr 2008 | DE |
102006051234 | May 2008 | DE |
102007018930 | Oct 2008 | DE |
102008054381 | Jun 2010 | DE |
102009060955 | Jul 2011 | DE |
102009060956 | Jul 2011 | DE |
102009060959 | Jul 2011 | DE |
0544200 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0707374 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0718959 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0796758 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0833429 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0998010 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1063754 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1117168 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1227566 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1921730 | May 2008 | EP |
1923683 | May 2008 | EP |
518298 | Sep 1938 | GB |
2052176 | Jan 1986 | GB |
60241758 | Nov 1985 | JP |
61042248 | Feb 1986 | JP |
2001025197 | Jan 2001 | JP |
1007577330000 | Sep 2007 | KR |
10-2008-0061415 | Sep 2008 | KR |
WO 9314551 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9934497 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0130643 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 02075895 | Sep 2002 | WO |
03003548 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004111591 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005091475 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006117210 | May 2006 | WO |
2006091089 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007024184 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2008128659 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009027938 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009116935 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009116936 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009116937 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009133295 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009156297 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010036221 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010048928 | May 2010 | WO |
2010076081 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010094515 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2011080285 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011080293 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011080294 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 29, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/721,765. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 13, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/679,806. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 30, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,238. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 3, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 30, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931. |
Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/679,806. |
Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,935. |
Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/721,765. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 15, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063301. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063301. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 20, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063236. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 17, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063236. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 24, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063336. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 17, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063336. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 15, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063287. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063287. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063268. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063268. |
Technical Project Presentation—Development of a High-Performance Generator for Wind Turbines—by Andrzej M. Trzynadlowski, PhD, University of Nevada, Reno, FIEEE. |
Technical Project Presentation—Development of a High-Performance Generator for Wind Turbines—Final Report—University of Nevada, Reno—Feb. 2004. |
“Magnetic Field Calculation of Claw Pole Permanent Magnet Machines Using Magnetic Network Method”, by Y.G. Guo et al., Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology, Sydney. |
“Applications of Power Electronics in Automotive Power Generation”,—by David J. Perreault et al., Laboratory for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 21-22, 2006—Paris. |
“Thermal Modeling of Lundell Alternators”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 20, No. 1, Mar. 2005. |
“Iron Loss Calculation in a Claw-Pole Structure”, by A. Reinap et al., Lund University. |
“Permanent Magnet Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Motor Design and Performance Improvement”,—A Dissertation by Peyman Niazi, Texas A&M University, Dec. 2005. |
“New Design of Hybrid-Type Self-Bearing Motor for Small, High-Speed Spindle”,—by Hideki Kanebako et al., IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 8, No. 1, Mar. 2003, retrieved Jan. 8, 2010. |
“Evaluation of Rotor Conducting Screens on the Single-Phase Switched Reluctance Machine”,—by M.M. Mahmoud et al., School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, May 3, 2005. |
“Analytical Interpretation and Quantification of Rotational Losses in Stator Cores of Induction Motors”,—IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43, No. 10, Oct. 2007, retrieved Jan. 8, 2010. |
Hasubek, B.E. et al.; “Design Limitations of Reduced Magnet Material Passive Rotor Transverse Flux Motors Investigated Using 3D Finite Element Analysis”; 2000; pp. 365-369, retrieved Oct. 24, 2008. |
Dubois, Maxine R. et al.; “Clawpole Transverse-Flux Machine with Hybrid Stator”; pp. 1-6. |
Henneberger, G. et al.; “On the Parameters Computation of a Single Sided Transverse Flux Motor”; Workshop on Electrical Machines' Parameters, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, May 26, 2001; pp. 35-40. |
Woolmer, MD, T.J., et al., “Analysis of the Yokeless and Segmented Armature Machine”, Electric Machines & Drives Conference, 2007. IEMDC apos; 07. IEEE International, May 3-5, 2007, pp. 704-708, vol. 1, Oxford University, Engineering Department, Parks Road, Oxford, UK. |
Husband, S.M. et al.; “The Rolls-Royce Transverse Flux Motor Development”; Electric Machines and Drives Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1435-1440, IEEE, 2003. |
Theory of SR Motor Operation (Power Point Presentation), copyright 2002 by George Holling and Rocky Mountain Technologies Inc. |
Development of a PM Transverse Flux Motor With Soft Magnetic Composite Core—IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 21, No. 2., Jun. 2006. |
Fundamental Modeling for Optimal Design of Transverse Flux Motors—Genevieve Patterson et al., University of Tokyo. |
www.higenmotor.com/eng/aboutus/about06read.asp?id=notice&no=87 dated Jan. 15, 2010. |
Lyng Eltorque Qt 800—2.0 User Manual, version 1.0—dated Jul. 3, 2007. |
Motors: Emerging Concepts by George Holling, Apr. 2007. |
www.iem.rwth-aachen.de/index.pl/new materials and machines?makePrintable=1; retrieved Jan. 15, 2010. |
Raser Technologies Company Brochure. |
Response to Office Action filed Jan. 15, 2010 for Japanese Patent Application No. JPPA-2003-548374. |
Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931. |
Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,934. |
Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 22, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,936. |
Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,935. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 4, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 10, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/063145. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 10, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/063142. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 18, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/063147. |
Office Action dated May 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,934. |
Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,936. |
Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,733. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 12, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,728. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,737. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 8, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,934. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 6, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,935. |
Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 20, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,933. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,936. |
Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 24, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/942,495. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 28, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,936. |
“Two Dimensional Finite Analysis of Passive Rotor Transverse Flux Motors with Slanted Rotor Design” by B.E. Hasubek, et al., May 1999. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 2, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/847,991. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 9, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,733. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 3, 2011, PCT/US2009/063142. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 3, 2011, PCT/US2009/063145. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 3, 2011, PCT/US2009/063147. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 23, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,837. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 8, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,958. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 7, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,959. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 7, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,962. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 24, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,933. |
Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,962. |
Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,959. |
Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/112,619. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120119610 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61414769 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61414774 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61414781 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61453075 | Mar 2011 | US |