A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. This patent document may show and/or describe matter which is or may become trade dress of the owner. The copyright and trade dress owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright and trade dress rights whatsoever.
This disclosure relates to radio frequency filters using acoustic wave resonators, and specifically to filters for use in communications equipment.
A radio frequency (RF) filter is a two-port device configured to pass some frequencies and to stop other frequencies, where “pass” means transmit with relatively low signal loss and “stop” means block or substantially attenuate. The range of frequencies passed by a filter is referred to as the “pass-band” of the filter. The range of frequencies stopped by such a filter is referred to as the “stop-band” of the filter. A typical RF filter has at least one pass-band and at least one stop-band. Specific requirements on a pass-band or stop-band depend on the specific application. For example, a “pass-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the insertion loss of a filter is better than a defined value such as 1 dB, 2 dB, or 3 dB. A “stop-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the rejection of a filter is greater than a defined value such as 20 dB, 30 dB, 40 dB, or greater depending on application.
RF filters are used in communications systems where information is transmitted over wireless links. For example, RF filters may be found in the RF front-ends of cellular base stations, mobile telephone and computing devices, satellite transceivers and ground stations, IoT (Internet of Things) devices, laptop computers and tablets, fixed point radio links, and other communications systems. RF filters are also used in radar and electronic and information warfare systems.
RF filters typically require many design trade-offs to achieve, for each specific application, the best compromise between performance parameters such as insertion loss, rejection, isolation, power handling, linearity, size and cost. Specific design and manufacturing methods and enhancements can benefit simultaneously one or several of these requirements.
Performance enhancements to the RF filters in a wireless system can have broad impact to system performance. Improvements in RF filters can be leveraged to provide system performance improvements such as larger cell size, longer battery life, higher data rates, greater network capacity, lower cost, enhanced security, higher reliability, etc. These improvements can be realized at many levels of the wireless system both separately and in combination, for example at the RF module, RF transceiver, mobile or fixed sub-system, or network levels.
High performance RF filters for present communication systems commonly incorporate acoustic wave resonators including surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators, bulk acoustic wave (BAW) resonators, film bulk acoustic wave resonators (FBAR), and other types of acoustic resonators. However, these existing technologies are not well-suited for use at the higher frequencies and bandwidths proposed for future communications networks.
The desire for wider communication channel bandwidths will inevitably lead to the use of higher frequency communications bands. Radio access technology for mobile telephone networks has been standardized by the 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project). Radio access technology for 5th generation mobile networks is defined in the 5G NR (new radio) standard. The 5G NR standard defines several new communications bands. Two of these new communications bands are n77, which uses the frequency range from 3300 MHz to 4200 MHz, and n79, which uses the frequency range from 4400 MHz to 5000 MHz. Both band n77 and band n79 use time-division duplexing (TDD), such that a communications device operating in band n77 and/or band n79 use the same frequencies for both uplink and downlink transmissions. Bandpass filters for bands n77 and n79 must be capable of handling the transmit power of the communications device. WiFi bands at 5 GHz and 6 GHz also require high frequency and wide bandwidth. The 5G NR standard also defines millimeter wave communication bands with frequencies between 24.25 GHz and 40 GHz.
The Transversely-Excited Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator (XBAR) is an acoustic resonator structure for use in microwave filters. The XBAR is described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,491,291, titled TRANSVERSELY EXCITED FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR. An XBAR resonator comprises an interdigital transducer (IDT) formed on a thin floating layer, or diaphragm, of a single-crystal piezoelectric material. The IDT includes a first set of parallel fingers, extending from a first busbar and a second set of parallel fingers extending from a second busbar. The first and second sets of parallel fingers are interleaved. A microwave signal applied to the IDT excites a shear primary acoustic wave in the piezoelectric diaphragm. XBAR resonators provide very high electromechanical coupling and high frequency capability. XBAR resonators may be used in a variety of RF filters including band-reject filters, band-pass filters, duplexers, and multiplexers. XBARs are well suited for use in filters for communications bands with frequencies above 3 GHz. Matrix XBAR filters are also suited for frequencies between 1 GHz and 3 GHz.
Throughout this description, elements appearing in figures are assigned three-digit or four-digit reference designators, where the two least significant digits are specific to the element and the one or two most significant digit is the figure number where the element is first introduced. An element that is not described in conjunction with a figure may be presumed to have the same characteristics and function as a previously-described element having the same reference designator.
Description of Apparatus
The XBAR 100 is made up of a thin film conductor pattern formed on a surface of a piezoelectric plate 110 having parallel front and back surfaces 112, 114, respectively. The piezoelectric plate is a thin single-crystal layer of a piezoelectric material such as lithium niobate, lithium tantalate, lanthanum gallium silicate, gallium nitride, or aluminum nitride. The piezoelectric plate is cut such that the orientation of the X, Y, and Z crystalline axes with respect to the front and back surfaces is known and consistent. In the examples presented in this patent, the piezoelectric plates are Z-cut, which is to say the Z axis is normal to the front and back surfaces 112, 114. However, XBARs may be fabricated on piezoelectric plates with other crystallographic orientations.
The back surface 114 of the piezoelectric plate 110 is attached to a surface of the substrate 120 except for a portion of the piezoelectric plate 110 that forms a diaphragm 115 spanning a cavity 140 formed in the substrate. The portion of the piezoelectric plate that spans the cavity is referred to herein as the “diaphragm” 115 due to its physical resemblance to the diaphragm of a microphone. As shown in
The substrate 120 provides mechanical support to the piezoelectric plate 110. The substrate 120 may be, for example, silicon, sapphire, quartz, or some other material or combination of materials. The back surface 114 of the piezoelectric plate 110 may be bonded to the substrate 120 using a wafer bonding process. Alternatively, the piezoelectric plate 110 may be grown on the substrate 120 or attached to the substrate in some other manner. The piezoelectric plate 110 may be attached directly to the substrate or may be attached to the substrate 120 via one or more intermediate material layers (not shown in
“Cavity” has its conventional meaning of “an empty space within a solid body.” The cavity 140 may be a hole completely through the substrate 120 (as shown in Section A-A and Section B-B) or a recess in the substrate 120 under the diaphragm 115. The cavity 140 may be formed, for example, by selective etching of the substrate 120 before or after the piezoelectric plate 110 and the substrate 120 are attached.
The conductor pattern of the XBAR 100 includes an interdigital transducer (IDT) 130. The IDT 130 includes a first plurality of parallel fingers, such as finger 136, extending from a first busbar 132 and a second plurality of fingers extending from a second busbar 134. The first and second pluralities of parallel fingers are interleaved. The interleaved fingers overlap for a distance AP, commonly referred to as the “aperture” of the IDT. The direction parallel to the IDT fingers will be referred to herein as the “aperture direction”. The center-to-center distance L between the outermost fingers of the IDT 130 is the “length” of the IDT. The direction perpendicular to the IDT fingers will be referred to herein as the “length direction.”
The first and second busbars 132, 134 serve as the terminals of the XBAR 100. A radio frequency or microwave signal applied between the two busbars 132, 134 of the IDT 130 excites a primary acoustic mode within the piezoelectric plate 110. As will be discussed in further detail, the primary acoustic mode is a bulk shear mode where acoustic energy propagates along a direction substantially orthogonal to the surface of the piezoelectric plate 110, which is also normal, or transverse, to the direction of the electric field created by the IDT fingers. Thus, the XBAR is considered a transversely-excited film bulk wave resonator.
The IDT 130 is positioned on the piezoelectric plate 110 such that at least the fingers of the IDT 130 are disposed on the diaphragm 115 of the piezoelectric plate which spans, or is suspended over, the cavity 140. As shown in
For ease of presentation in
Referring to the detailed cross-sectional view (Detail C), a front-side dielectric layer 150 may optionally be formed on the front side of the piezoelectric plate 110. The “front side” of the XBAR is, by definition, the surface facing away from the substrate. The front-side dielectric layer 150 may be formed only between the IDT fingers (e.g. IDT finger 138b) or may be deposited as a blanket layer such that the dielectric layer is formed both between and over the IDT fingers (e.g. IDT finger 138a). The front-side dielectric layer 150 may be a non-piezoelectric dielectric material, such as silicon dioxide or silicon nitride. The thickness of the front side dielectric layer is typically less than or equal to the thickness of the piezoelectric plate. The front-side dielectric layer 150 may be formed of multiple layers of two or more materials.
The IDT fingers 138a and 138b may be aluminum, an aluminum alloy, copper, a copper alloy, beryllium, gold, tungsten, molybdenum or some other conductive material. The IDT fingers are considered to be “substantially aluminum” if they are formed from aluminum or an alloy comprising at least 50% aluminum. The IDT fingers are considered to be “substantially copper” if they are formed from copper or an alloy comprising at least 50% copper. Thin (relative to the total thickness of the conductors) layers of other metals, such as chromium or titanium, may be formed under and/or over and/or as layers within the fingers to improve adhesion between the fingers and the piezoelectric plate 110 and/or to passivate or encapsulate the fingers and/or to improve power handling. The busbars 132, 134 of the IDT may be made of the same or different materials as the fingers.
Dimension p is the center-to-center spacing or “pitch” of the IDT fingers, which may be referred to as the pitch of the IDT and/or the pitch of the XBAR. Dimension m is the mark of the IDT fingers.
As shown in DETAIL C, IDT finger 138a has a trapezoidal cross-sectional shape and IDT finger 138b has a rectangular cross-sectional shape. The IDT fingers 138a, 138b may have some other cross-section, such as T-shaped or stepped. The IDT fingers 138a, 138b are shown as single layer structures which may be aluminum or some other metal. IDT fingers may include multiple layers of materials, which may be selected to have different acoustic loss and/or different acoustic impedance. When multiple material layers are used, the cross-sectional shapes of the layers may be different. Further, a thin adhesion layer of another material, such as titanium or chrome, may be formed between the IDT fingers 138a, 138b and the piezoelectric plate 110. Although not shown in
An XBAR based on shear acoustic wave resonances can achieve better performance than current state-of-the art surface acoustic wave (SAW), film-bulk-acoustic-resonators (FBAR), and solidly-mounted-resonator bulk-acoustic-wave (SMR BAW) devices. In particular, the piezoelectric coupling for shear wave XBAR resonances can be high (>20%) compared to other acoustic resonators. High piezoelectric coupling enables the design and implementation of microwave and millimeter-wave filters of various types with appreciable bandwidth.
The basic behavior of acoustic resonators, including XBARs, is commonly described using the Butterworth Van Dyke (BVD) circuit model as shown in
The first primary resonance of the BVD model is the motional resonance caused by the series combination of the motional inductance Lm and the motional capacitance Cm. The second primary resonance of the BVD model is the anti-resonance caused by the combination of the motional inductance Lm, the motional capacitance Cm, and the static capacitance C0. In a lossless resonator (Rm=R0=0), the frequency Fr of the motional resonance is given by
The frequency Fa of the anti-resonance is given by
where γ=C0/Cm is dependent on the resonator structure and the type and the orientation of the crystalline axes of the piezoelectric material.
The frequency Fa of the anti-resonance is given by
In over-simplified terms, the lossless acoustic resonator can be considered a short circuit at the resonance frequency 212 and an open circuit at the anti-resonance frequency 214. The resonance and anti-resonance frequencies in
Specifically, the solid curve 310 is a plot of the magnitude of admittance of the exemplary XBAR as a function of frequency. The dashed line 320 is a plot of the real component of admittance for the XBAR. The curves 310 and 320 are read using the left-hand vertical axis. The exemplary XBAR includes a Z-cut lithium niobate piezoelectric plate with a thickness of 0.368 um. The IDT pitch is 4.4 um, and the IDT finger mark is 0.96 um. The IDT mark/pitch ratio is 0.22. The IDT is predominantly aluminum with a total thickness of 0.491 um. The gap between the ends of the IDT fingers and the adjacent busbar is 5.0 um. The XBAR has a resonance frequency about 4250 MHz (not shown) and an anti-resonance frequency about 4680 MHz. The exemplary XBAR may be, for example, a shunt resonator for a band n79 bandpass filter. The frequency range of the graph 300 spans the n79 band from 4400 MHz to 5000 MHz which includes the admittance minimum at the anti-resonance of the XBAR.
The dot-dash curve 330 is a plot of the Bode Q-factor for the XBAR. Bode Q-factor is a measure of the efficiency of a resonator and is equal to 2π times the peak energy stored during a cycle of the input signal divided by the total energy dissipated during the cycle. The curve 330 is read against the right-hand vertical axis.
The XBAR 400 includes a thin film conductor pattern formed on a surface of a piezoelectric plate 410. The piezoelectric plate 410 may be a thin plate of a single-crystal piezoelectric material. The material and the crystal orientation of the piezoelectric plate 410 may be as previously described.
A back surface of the piezoelectric plate 410 is attached to a surface of a substrate 420 except for a portion of the piezoelectric plate 410 that forms a diaphragm 415 spanning a cavity 440 formed in the substrate. The substrate 420 may be, for example, silicon, sapphire, quartz, or some other material or combination of materials. The piezoelectric plate 410 and the substrate 420 may be bonded or attached as previously described.
The conductor pattern of the XBAR 400 includes an interdigital transducer (IDT) 430. The IDT 430 includes a first plurality of parallel fingers, such as finger 436, extending from a first busbar 432 and a second plurality of fingers extending from a second busbar 434. The first and second pluralities of parallel fingers are interleaved. The interleaved fingers overlap for a distance AP, commonly referred to as the “aperture” of the IDT. The direction parallel to the IDT fingers will be referred to herein as the “aperture direction”. The center-to-center distance L between the outermost fingers of the IDT 430 is the “length” of the IDT. The direction perpendicular to the IDT fingers will be referred to herein as the “length direction.” The IDT 430 is positioned on the piezoelectric plate 410 such that at least the fingers of the IDT 430 are disposed on the diaphragm 415. The materials of the conductor pattern may be as previously described.
Each dielectric strip ACS 452, 454 is a strip of dielectric material that overlaps the IDT fingers at the margins of the aperture and extends into the gap between the ends of the IDT fingers and the adjacent busbars. In this context, the term “margin” means “the extreme edge of something and the area lying parallel to and immediately adjoining this edge especially when in some way distinguished from the remaining area lying farther in.” In this case the margins of the aperture are distinguished by the presence of the dielectric strip ACS overlapping the IDT fingers.
The first dielectric strip ACS 452, which is proximate the first busbar 432, overlaps the IDT fingers in a first margin of the aperture. The first dielectric strip ACS 452 extends into the gap between the first busbar and ends of the IDT fingers extending from the second busbar. The second dielectric strip ACS 454 overlaps the IDT fingers in a second margin of the aperture. The second dielectric strip ACS 454 extends into the gap between the second busbar and ends of the IDT fingers extending from the first busbar.
The first and second dielectric strips ACS 452, 454 extend the entire length of the IDS 430, which is to say the ACS overlaps the ends of all the fingers of the IDT. The ACS 452, 454 may extend beyond the length of the IDT 430 as shown in
The dielectric strip ACS 454 has a total width of ds, of which a first portion with a width dol overlaps the IDT finger 436 in the margin of the aperture, and a second portion with a width dg is disposed on the diaphragm 410 in the gap 538. dg is less than g such that the second portion of the dielectric strip ACS 454 does not span the gap 538. The thickness is of the dielectric strip ACS may be between 4 nm and 30 nm. The thickness td of the piezoelectric plate 410 may be between 100 nm and 1000 nm. The effect of the thickness of the dielectric strip ACS will be discussed subsequently.
In the example of
In the examples of
The characteristics of XBAR devices scale with frequency. Frequency, in turn, is inversely dependent on the thickness of the diaphragm including the piezoelectric plate and any dielectric layers. To facilitate the design of XBARs for applications and frequencies other than the n79 shunt resonator used in all of the examples in this patent, it is convenient to express dimension relative to the thickness td of the diaphragm. For all of the examples in this patent, the diaphragm thickness td is 0.50 μm.
The dashed curve 720 is a plot of the Bode Q of a similar XBAR with a dielectric strip in the margins of the aperture. The dielectric strip has a width of 0.68 μm and does not extend into the gap between the ends of the IDT fingers and the busbars. Referring to the dimensions defined in
The dot-dash curve 730 is a plot of the Bode Q of a similar XBAR with a dielectric strip only in the gaps between the ends of the IDT fingers and the busbars. The dielectric strips have a width of 1 μm and are positioned 0.2 μm from the ends of the IDT fingers. Referring to the dimensions defined in
The dot-dot-dash curve 740 is a plot of the Bode Q of a similar XBAR with a dielectric strip ACS that overlaps the ends of the IDT fingers and extends into the gaps as shown in
Comparison of the curves 710, 720, 730, and 740 shows that the addition of a narrow (i.e. ds=2.0td) dielectric strip either on the IDT fingers or in the gap (curves 720, 730) provides an improvement in Bode Q near the lower band edge. The wide dielectric strip (ds=4.4td, curve 740) that overlaps the ends of the IDT fingers and extends into the gaps provides higher Bode Q near the lower band edge than either of the narrow dielectric strips.
The presence of a dielectric strip ACS improves Bode Q between the resonance and antiresonance frequencies but may reduce Bode Q at frequencies lower than resonance and above antiresonance. Overall, this can be a beneficial tradeoff. The sharpness of a filter transfer function at its lower band edge depends mostly on the Bode Q of shunt resonators between resonance and antiresonance, the contribution from series resonators can be limiting if their Bode Q at the lower band edge is too low. Similarly, while the Bode Q of the series resonators is most important at the upper band edge, the sharpness of the upper band edge may be limited if the Bode Q of shunt resonators is too low. The design of a filter is a continuous tradeoff of factors including the geometry of the dielectric strip ACS on each resonator.
For XBARs using Z-cut lithium niobate piezoelectric plates, the primary effect that limits Bode Q between resonance and antiresonance is excitation of unwanted obliquely traveling waves in a finite aperture device. Adding a dielectric strip ACS suppresses the excitation of unwanted oblique waves. Losses due to excitation of obliquely traveling waves are unrelated to coupling to the y-component of the electric field. That is a separate and relatively negligible source of loss which is dwarfed in comparison to the excitation of oblique waves. Obliquely traveling waves are excited because of the mechanical difference between the IDT and gap region, which the dielectric strip addresses.
The dashed curve 820 is a plot of the Bode Q of a similar XBAR with a wide dielectric strip ACS with a thickness ts equal to 4 nm or 0.008td. The dot-dash curve 830 is a plot of the Bode Q of another XBAR with a similar dielectric strip ACS with a thickness ts=8 nm or 0.016td. The dot-dot-dash curve 840 is a plot of the Bode Q of another XBAR with a thickness ts=15 nm or 0.030td.
Comparison of the curves 810, 820, 830, and 840 shows that a wide dielectric strip ACS with a thickness of only 0.008td provides a significant improvement in Bode Q near the lower band edge. The Bode Q near the lower band edge improves with increasing dielectric strip thickness up to at least 0.030td. There is small additional improvement in Bode Q for thicker dielectric strips, but other losses may become significant for dielectric strips with ts≥0.06td.
The solid curve 910 is a plot of the Bode Q of an exemplary XBAR with a dielectric strip ACS with dol=0.3 μm=0.60td. The dashed curve 920 is a plot of the Bode Q of an exemplary XBAR with a dol=0.7 μm=1.40td. The dot-dash curve 930 is a plot of the Bode Q of an exemplary XBAR with dol=1.0 μm=2.0td. The dot-dot-dash curve 940 is a plot of the Bode Q of an exemplary XBAR with a dielectric strip ACS with dol=1.5 μm=3.0td. Comparison of the curves 910, 920, 930, 940 shows there is little dependence of Bode Q on the overlap distance dol, particularly for frequencies near the lower edge of the n79 band, over the ranges 0.6td≤dol≤3.0td and 4.0td≤ds≤8.0td.
In the exemplary filter 1200, the three series resonators 1210A, 1210B, and 1210C and the two shunt resonators 1220A and 1220B of the filter 1200 are formed on a single plate 1230 of piezoelectric material bonded to a silicon substrate (not visible). In some filters, the series resonators and shunt resonators may be formed on different plates of piezoelectric material. Each resonator includes a respective IDT (not shown), with at least the fingers of the IDT disposed over a cavity in the substrate. In this and similar contexts, the term “respective” means “relating things each to each”, which is to say with a one-to-one correspondence. In
Each of the resonators 1210A, 1210B, 1210C, 1220A, and 1220B in the filter 1200 has resonance where the admittance of the resonator is very high and an anti-resonance where the admittance of the resonator is very low. The resonance and anti-resonance occur at a resonance frequency and an anti-resonance frequency, respectively, which may be the same or different for the various resonators in the filter 1200. In over-simplified terms, each resonator can be considered a short-circuit at its resonance frequency and an open circuit at its anti-resonance frequency. The input-output transfer function will be near zero at the resonance frequencies of the shunt resonators and at the anti-resonance frequencies of the series resonators. In a typical filter, the resonance frequencies of the shunt resonators are positioned below the lower edge of the filter's passband and the anti-resonance frequencies of the series resonators are positioned above the upper edge of the passband. In some filters, a dielectric layer (also called a “frequency setting layer”), represented by the dot-dash rectangle 1270, may be formed on the front and/or back surface of the shunt resonators to set the resonance frequencies of the shunt resonators lower relative to the resonance frequencies of the series resonators. In other filters, series resonators may have thinner piezoelectric plates than shunt resonators. In some filters, the series resonators and the shunt resonators may be fabricated on separate chips having different piezoelectric plate thicknesses.
The solid curve 1310 is a plot of maximum available gain of a band n79 bandpass filter with dielectric strip ACS on all resonators. The piezoelectric plate thickness is 370 nm as in previous examples. Shunt resonators have a dielectric layer 130 nm thick and series resonators have a dielectric layer 30 nm thick. The thickness is of the dielectric strip ACS of every resonator is 15 nm or 0.03td for shunt resonators and 0.0375td for series resonators. The total width dt of the dielectric strip ACS on each resonator is individually optimized and varies between 3 um and 6 um such that 6td≤dt≤15td. In general, dt for series resonators tends to be larger than dt for shunt resonators. Comparison of the solid curve 1310 and the dashed curve 1329 shows incorporation of a dielectric strip ACS on all of the XBARs of the filter increases the maximum available gain by 0.6 dB at the lower band edge and 0.3 dB at the upper band edge.
The dot-dash curve 1330 is a plot of maximum available gain of a band n79 bandpass filter similar to the previous example with the thickness ts of the dielectric strip ACS on series resonators increased to 25 nm or 0.0625td. Increasing the thickness of the dielectric strip ACS on the series resonators provides a further 0.2 dB of maximum available gain at the upper band edge at the expense of increasing the amplitude and number of spurs in the passband.
While the incorporation of wide dielectric strip ACS can reduce losses at the band edges of a bandpass filter, the ACS may introduce spurs or ripple within the passband of the filter, such as the spur 1325 in the dashed curve 1320 and the spurs 1332 and 1334 in the dot-dash curve 1330. Such spurs may be caused by acoustic modes that are confined to the dielectric strip ACS.
Spurs introduced by dielectric strip ACS can be minimized, if not eliminated, by varying the ACS structures within and between various resonators in the filter. For example, in the filter 1200 of
In addition, the dimensions of a dielectric strip ACS may be varied within a resonator. For example,
In a filter with multiple XBARs, the dielectric strip ACSs of the various XBARs may be the same or different. Some or all of the XBARs may have dielectric strip ACS with different total width ds or different overlap dol with the IDT fingers. Some, all, or none of XBARs in a filter may have dielectric strip ACS that vary along the length of the respective IDTs. XBARs with dielectric strip ACS that vary along the length of the respective IDTs may vary in different manners.
Description of Methods
While
The flow chart of
The piezoelectric plate may typically be ZY-cut lithium niobate. The piezoelectric plate may be some other material and/or some other cut. The device substrate may preferably be silicon. The device substrate may be some other material that allows formation of deep cavities by etching or other processing.
In one variation of the process 1500, one or more cavities are formed in the device substrate at 1510A, before the piezoelectric plate is bonded to the substrate at 1515. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. Also, the cavities can be shaped and formed such that two or more resonators can be on one diaphragm over one cavity. These resonators sharing a diaphragm are acoustically coupled on an acoustic track. The one or more cavities may be formed using conventional photolithographic and etching techniques. Typically, the cavities formed at 1510A will not penetrate through the device substrate.
At 1515, the piezoelectric plate is bonded to the device substrate. The piezoelectric plate and the device substrate may be bonded by a wafer bonding process. Typically, the mating surfaces of the device substrate and the piezoelectric plate are highly polished. One or more layers of intermediate materials, such as an oxide or metal, may be formed or deposited on the mating surface of one or both of the piezoelectric plate and the device substrate. One or both mating surfaces may be activated using, for example, a plasma process. The mating surfaces may then be pressed together with considerable force to establish molecular bonds between the piezoelectric plate and the device substrate or intermediate material layers.
At 1520, the sacrificial substrate may be removed. For example, the piezoelectric plate and the sacrificial substrate may be a wafer of piezoelectric material that has been ion implanted to create defects in the crystal structure along a plane that defines a boundary between what will become the piezoelectric plate and the sacrificial substrate. At 1520, the wafer may be split along the defect plane, for example by thermal shock, detaching the sacrificial substrate and leaving the piezoelectric plate bonded to the device substrate. The exposed surface of the piezoelectric plate may be polished or processed in some manner after the sacrificial substrate is detached.
A first conductor pattern, including IDTs of each XBAR, is formed at 1530 by depositing and patterning one or more conductor layers on the front side of the piezoelectric plate. The conductor layer may be, for example, aluminum, an aluminum alloy, copper, a copper alloy, or some other conductive metal. Optionally, one or more layers of other materials may be disposed below (i.e. between the conductor layer and the piezoelectric plate) and/or on top of the conductor layer. For example, a thin film of titanium, chrome, or other metal may be used to improve the adhesion between the conductor layer and the piezoelectric plate. A second conductor pattern of gold, aluminum, copper or other higher conductivity metal may be formed over portions of the first conductor pattern (for example the IDT bus bars and interconnections between the IDTs).
Each conductor pattern may be formed at 1530 by depositing the conductor layer and, optionally, one or more other metal layers in sequence over the surface of the piezoelectric plate. The excess metal may then be removed by etching through patterned photoresist. The conductor layer can be etched, for example, by plasma etching, reactive ion etching, wet chemical etching, or other etching techniques.
Alternatively, each conductor pattern may be formed at 1530 using a lift-off process. Photoresist may be deposited over the piezoelectric plate. and patterned to define the conductor pattern. The conductor layer and, optionally, one or more other layers may be deposited in sequence over the surface of the piezoelectric plate. The photoresist may then be removed, which removes the excess material, leaving the conductor pattern.
At 1540, dielectric strip ACS may be formed. As previously described, the dielectric strip ACS may overlap the ends of the IDT fingers in the margins of the aperture and extend into the gaps between the ends of the IDT fingers and adjacent busbars. The dielectric strip ACS may be formed by depositing and patterning, using either etching or a lift-off technique, a dielectric thin film. The dielectric strip ACS may be silicon dioxide, silicon nitride, aluminum oxide, or some other dielectric material. The dielectric strip ACS may be multiple layers of different materials or a mixture of two or more materials.
At 1550, one or more frequency setting dielectric layer(s) may optionally be formed by depositing one or more layers of dielectric material on the front side of the piezoelectric plate. For example, a dielectric layer may be formed over the shunt resonators to lower the frequencies of the shunt resonators relative to the frequencies of the series resonators. The one or more dielectric layers may be deposited using a conventional deposition technique such as physical vapor deposition, atomic layer deposition, chemical vapor deposition, or some other method. One or more lithography processes (using photomasks) may be used to limit the deposition of the dielectric layers to selected areas of the piezoelectric plate. For example, a mask may be used to limit a dielectric layer to cover only the shunt resonators. The formation of one or more frequency setting layers at 1550 may be performed before or after (as shown) the formation of the dielectric strip ACS at 1540.
At 1555, a passivation/tuning dielectric layer is deposited over the piezoelectric plate and conductor patterns. The passivation/tuning dielectric layer may cover the entire surface of the filter except for pads for electrical connections to circuitry external to the filter. In some instantiations of the process 1500, the passivation/tuning dielectric layer may be formed after the cavities in the device substrate are etched at either 1510B or 1510C.
In a second variation of the process 1500, one or more cavities are formed in the back side of the device substrate at 1510B. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. Also, the cavities can be shaped and formed such that two or more resonators can be on one diaphragm over one cavity. These resonators sharing a diaphragm are acoustically coupled on an acoustic track. The one or more cavities may be formed using an anisotropic or orientation-dependent dry or wet etch to open holes through the back side of the device substrate to the piezoelectric plate. In this case, the resulting resonator devices will have a cross-section as shown in
In a third variation of the process 1500, one or more cavities in the form of recesses in the device substrate may be formed at 1510C by etching the substrate using an etchant introduced through openings in the piezoelectric plate. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. Also, the cavities can be shaped and formed such that two or more resonators can be on one diaphragm over one cavity. These resonators sharing a diaphragm are acoustically coupled on an acoustic track. The one or more cavities formed at 1510C will not penetrate through the device substrate.
Ideally, after the cavities are formed at 1510B or 1510C, most or all of the filter devices on a wafer will meet a set of performance requirements. However, normal process tolerances will result in variations in parameters such as the thicknesses of dielectric layer formed at 1550 and 1555, variations in the thickness and line widths of conductors and IDT fingers formed at 1530, and variations in the thickness of the piezoelectric plate. These variations contribute to deviations of the filter device performance from the set of performance requirements.
To improve the yield of filter devices meeting the performance requirements, frequency tuning may be performed by selectively adjusting the thickness of the passivation/tuning layer deposited over the resonators at 1555. The frequency of a filter device passband can be lowered by adding material to the passivation/tuning layer, and the frequency of the filter device passband can be increased by removing material to the passivation/tuning layer. Typically, the process 1500 is biased to produce filter devices with passbands that are initially lower than a required frequency range but can be tuned to the desired frequency range by removing material from the surface of the passivation/tuning layer.
At 1560, a probe card or other means may be used to make electrical connections with the filter to allow radio frequency (RF) tests and measurements of filter characteristics such as input-output transfer function. Typically, RF measurements are made on all, or a large portion, of the filter devices fabricated simultaneously on a common piezoelectric plate and substrate.
At 1565, global frequency tuning may be performed by removing material from the surface of the passivation/tuning layer using a selective material removal tool such as, for example, a scanning ion mill as previously described. “Global” tuning is performed with a spatial resolution equal to or larger than an individual filter device. The objective of global tuning is to move the passband of each filter device towards a desired frequency range. The test results from 1560 may be processed to generate a global contour map indicating the amount of material to be removed as a function of two-dimensional position on the wafer. The material is then removed in accordance with the contour map using the selective material removal tool.
At 1570, local frequency tuning may be performed in addition to, or instead of, the global frequency tuning performed at 1565. “Local” frequency tuning is performed with a spatial resolution smaller than an individual filter device. The test results from 1560 may be processed to generate a map indicating the amount of material to be removed at each filter device. Local frequency tuning may require the use of a mask to restrict the size of the areas from which material is removed. For example, a first mask may be used to restrict tuning to only shunt resonators, and a second mask may be subsequently used to restrict tuning to only series resonators (or vice versa). This would allow independent tuning of the lower band edge (by tuning shunt resonators) and upper band edge (by tuning series resonators) of the filter devices.
After frequency tuning at 1565 and/or 1570, the filter device is completed at 1575. Actions that may occur at 1575 include forming bonding pads or solder bumps or other means for making connection between the device and external circuitry (if such pads were not formed at 1530); excising individual filter devices from a wafer containing multiple filter devices; other packaging steps; and additional testing. After each filter device is completed, the process ends at 1595.
Closing Comments
Throughout this description, the embodiments and examples shown should be considered as exemplars, rather than limitations on the apparatus and procedures disclosed or claimed. Although many of the examples presented herein involve specific combinations of method acts or system elements, it should be understood that those acts and those elements may be combined in other ways to accomplish the same objectives. With regard to flowcharts, additional and fewer steps may be taken, and the steps as shown may be combined or further refined to achieve the methods described herein. Acts, elements and features discussed only in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from a similar role in other embodiments.
As used herein, “plurality” means two or more. As used herein, a “set” of items may include one or more of such items. As used herein, whether in the written description or the claims, the terms “comprising”, “including”, “carrying”, “having”, “containing”, “involving”, and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of”, respectively, are closed or semi-closed transitional phrases with respect to claims. Use of ordinal terms such as “first”, “second”, “third”, etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements. As used herein, “and/or” means that the listed items are alternatives, but the alternatives also include any combination of the listed items.
This patent claims priority from the following provisional patent applications: 63/182,465, filed Apr. 30, 2021, entitled OXIDE STRIP ACOUSTIC CONFINEMENT STRUCTURES FOR Z-CUT LN; 63/187,932, filed May 12, 2021, entitled DUAL OXIDE STRIP ACOUSTIC CONFINEMENT STRUCTURES FOR Z-CUT LN; 63/191,897, filed May 21, 2021, entitled BEST PRACTICES FOR OXIDE STRIP ACOUSTIC CONFINEMENT STRUCTURES; and 63/208,503, filed Jun. 9, 2021, entitled CHIRPED WIDE OXIDE STRIP ACOUSTIC CONFINEMENT STRUCTURES. The entire content of these applications is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5204575 | Kanda et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5274345 | Gau | Dec 1993 | A |
5446330 | Eda et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5552655 | Stokes et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5726610 | Allen et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729186 | Seki et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5853601 | Krishaswamy et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6172582 | Hickernell | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6271617 | Yoneda et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6377140 | Ehara et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6516503 | Ikada et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540827 | Levy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570470 | Maehara et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6707229 | Martin | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6710514 | Ikada et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6833774 | Abbott et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7009468 | Kadota et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7345400 | Nakao et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7463118 | Jacobsen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7535152 | Ogami et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7684109 | Godshalk et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7728483 | Tanaka | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7868519 | Umeda | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7941103 | Iwamoto et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7965015 | Tai et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8278802 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8294330 | Abbott et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8344815 | Yamanaka et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8816567 | Zuo et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8829766 | Milyutin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8932686 | Hayakawa et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9093979 | Wang | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9112134 | Takahashi | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9130145 | Martin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9148121 | Inoue | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9219466 | Meltaus et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9276557 | Nordquist et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9369105 | Li et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9425765 | Rinaldi et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9525398 | Olsson et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9640750 | Nakanishi et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9748923 | Kando et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9748924 | Komatsu et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9762202 | Thalmayr et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9780759 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9837984 | Khlat et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10079414 | Guyette et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10187039 | Komatsu et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10200013 | Bower et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10211806 | Bhattacharjee | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10284176 | Solal | May 2019 | B1 |
10491192 | Plesski et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10601392 | Plesski et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10637438 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10644674 | Takamine | May 2020 | B2 |
10756697 | Plesski et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10790802 | Yantchev et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10797675 | Plesski et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10812048 | Nosaka | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10819309 | Turner et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10826462 | Plesski et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10868510 | Yantchev et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10868512 | Garcia et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10868513 | Yantchev | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10911017 | Plesski | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10911021 | Turner et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10911023 | Turner | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10917070 | Plesski et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10917072 | McHugh et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10985726 | Plesski | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10985728 | Plesski et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10985730 | Garcia | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10992282 | Plesski et al. | Apr 2021 | B1 |
10992283 | Plesski et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10992284 | Yantchev | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10998877 | Turner et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
10998882 | Yantchev et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11003971 | Plesski et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11114996 | Plesski et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11114998 | Garcia et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11139794 | Plesski et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11143561 | Plesski et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11146231 | Plesski | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11146232 | Yandrapalli et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11146238 | Hammond et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11146244 | Yantchev et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11165407 | Yantchev et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11171629 | Turner | Nov 2021 | B2 |
20020079986 | Ruby et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020130736 | Mukai | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020158714 | Kaitila et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020189062 | Lin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030042998 | Edmonson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030080831 | Naumenko et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030199105 | Kub et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040041496 | Imai et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040100164 | Murata | May 2004 | A1 |
20040261250 | Kadota et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050077982 | Funasaka | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050185026 | Noguchi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050218488 | Matsuo | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050264136 | Tsutsumi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060152107 | Tanaka | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179642 | Kawamura | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070182510 | Park | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188047 | Tanaka | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194863 | Shibata et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070267942 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080246559 | Ayazi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100019866 | Hara et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100064492 | Tanaka | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100123367 | Tai et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110018389 | Fukano et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018654 | Bradley et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110109196 | Goto et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110278993 | Iwamoto | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120073390 | Zaghloul et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120198672 | Ueda et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120286900 | Kadota et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120326809 | Tsuda | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130127551 | Yamanaka | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147577 | Nishihara et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130234805 | Takahashi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130271238 | Onda | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130278609 | Stephanou et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130321100 | Wang | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140130319 | Iwamoto | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145556 | Kadota | May 2014 | A1 |
20140151151 | Reinhardt | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140152145 | Kando et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173862 | Kando et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140225684 | Kando et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150014795 | Franosch et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150042417 | Onodera et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150165479 | Lasiter et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150319537 | Perois et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150333730 | Meltaus et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150365067 | Hori et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160028367 | Shealy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160087187 | Burak | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160182009 | Bhattacharjee | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170063332 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170077902 | Daimon | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170179225 | Kishimoto | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170179928 | Raihn et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170214381 | Bhattacharjee | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170214387 | Burak et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170222617 | Mizoguchi | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170222622 | Solal et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170370791 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180005950 | Watanabe | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180026603 | Iwamoto | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180033952 | Yamamoto | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180041191 | Park | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180062615 | Kato et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180062617 | Yun et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180123016 | Gong | May 2018 | A1 |
20180191322 | Chang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180278227 | Hurwitz | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180309426 | Guenard et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190068164 | Houlden et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190123721 | Takamine | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131953 | Gong | May 2019 | A1 |
20190273480 | Lin et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190348966 | Campanella-Pineda | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190379351 | Miyamoto et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190386636 | Plesski et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200007110 | Konaka et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200021272 | Segovia Fernandez et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200036357 | Mimura | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200162052 | Matsuoka et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200235719 | Yantchev et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200259480 | Pensala | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200274520 | Shin et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200313645 | Caron | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200350891 | Turner | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210013859 | Turner et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210067134 | Fujiwara | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210265978 | Plesski et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210328574 | Garcia | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210351762 | Dyer et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20230336143 | Tetsuya | Oct 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2020088459 | Jun 2020 | JP |
2015182521 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016017104 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2018003273 | Jan 2018 | WO |
2019241174 | Dec 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
T. Takai, H. Iwamoto, et al., “I.H.P.Saw Technology and its Application to Microacoustic Components (Invited). ” 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sep. 6-9, 2017. pp. 1-8 Sep. 6, 2017. |
R. Olsson III, K. Hattar et al. “A high electromechanical coupling coefficient SH0 Lamb wave lithiumniobate micromechanical resonator and a method for fabrication” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 209, Mar. 1, 2014, pp. 183-190. 00 Mar. 2014. |
M. Kadota, S. Tanaka, “Wideband acoustic wave resonators composed of hetero acoustic layer structure,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 57, No. 7S1. Published Jun. 5, 2018. 5 pages. Jun. 5, 2018. |
Y. Yang, R. Lu et al. “Towards Ka Band Acoustics: Lithium Niobat Asymmetrical Mode Piezoelectric MEMS Resonators”, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, May 2018. pp. 1-2. 00 May 2018. |
Y. Yang, A. Gao et al. “5 Ghz Lithium Niobate Mems Resonators With High FOM of 153”, 2017 IEEE 30th International Conference in Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). Jan. 22-26, 2017. pp. 942-945 Jan. 22, 2017. |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/036433 dated Aug. 29, 2019. Aug. 29, 2019. |
Mizutaui, K. and Toda, K., “Analysis of lamb wave propagation characteristics in rotated Ycut Xpropagation LiNbO3 plates.” Electron. Comm. Jpn. Pt. I, 69, No. 4 (1986): 47-55. doi: 10.1002/ecja.4410690406 00 Jan. 1986. |
Safari et al. “Piezoelectric for Transducer Applications”published by Elsevier Science Ltd., pp. 4 (Year: 2000). 00 Jan. 2000. |
Buchanan “Ceramic Materials for Electronics” 3rd Edition, first published in 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 496 (Year 2004). 00 Jan. 2004. |
Moussa et al. Review on Triggered Liposomal Drug Delivery with a Focus on Ultrasound2015, Bentham Science Publishers, pp. 16 (Year 2005) 00 Jan. 2005. |
Acoustic Properties of SolidsONDA Corporation592 Weddell Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94089, Apr. 11, 2003, pp. 5 (Year 2003) Apr. 11, 2003. |
Sorokin et al.Study of Microwave Acoustic Attenuation in a Multi-frequency Bulk Acoustic Resonator Based on a Synthetic Diamond Single CrystalPublished in Acoustical Physics, vol. 61, No. 6, 2015 pp. 675 (Year 2015) 00 Jan. 2015. |
Material Properties of Tibtech Innovations, © 2018 TIBTECH Innovations (Year 2018) 00 Jan. 2018. |
Zou, Jie “High-Performance Aluminum Nitride Lamb Wave Resonators for RF Front-End Technology” University of California, Berkeley, Summer 2015, pp. 63 (Year 2015) 00 Jan. 2015. |
Bahreynl, B.Fabrication and Design of Resonant MicrodevicesAndrew William, Inc. 2018, NY (Year 2008) 00 Jan. 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/058632 dated Jan. 17, 2020. Jan. 17, 2020. |
G. Manohar, Investigation of Various Surface Acoustic Wave Design Configurations for Improved Sensitivity, Jan. 2012, Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, USA Jan. 2012. |
Ekeom, D. & Dubus, Bertrand & Volatier, A., Solidly mounted resonator (SMR) FEM-BWM simulation, 2006, 1474-1477, 10.1109/ULTSYM.2006.371. 2006. |
Santosh, G. , Surface acoustic wave devices on silicon using patterned and thin film ZnO, Ph.D. thesis, Feb. 2016, Indian Institute of technology Guwahati, Assam, India Feb. 2016. |
Kadota et al. “5.4 Ghz Lamb Wave Resonator on LiNbO3 Thin Crystal Plate and Its Application,” published in Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 50 (2011) 07HD11. (Year: 2011) 2011. |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/45654 dated Oct. 29, 2020. 2020. |
Naumenko et al., “Optimal orientations of Lithium Niobate for resonator SAW filters”, 2003 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium—pp. 2110-2113. (Year: 2003) 2003. |
Namdeo et al. “Simulation on Effects of Electrical Loading due to Interdigital Transducers in Surface Acoustic Wave Resonator”, published in Procedia Engineering 64 ( 2013) of Science Direct pp. 322-330 (Year: 2013) 2013. |
Rodriguez-Madrid et al., “Super-High-Frequency SAW Resonators on AIN/Diamond”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 33, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 495-497. Year: 2012) 2012. |
Webster Dictionary, Meaning of “diaphragm” Merriam Webster since 1828. 1828. |
A. C. Guyette, “Theory and Design of Intrinsically Switched Multiplexers With Optimum Phase Linearity,” in IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 61, No. 9, pp. 3254-3264, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2013.2274963. Sep. 2013. |
Yanson Yang, Ruochen Lu, Songbin Gong, High Q Antisymmetric Mode Lithium Niobate MEMS Resonators With Spurious Mitigation, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 29, No. 2, Apr. 2020. Apr. 2, 2020. |
Yu-Po Wong, Luyan Qiu, Naoto Matsuoka, Ken-ya Hashimoto, Broadband Piston Mode Operation for First-order Antisymmetric Mode Resonators, 2020 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sep. 2020. Sep. 2020. |
Bai et al. “The Simulation of Resonant Mode and Effective Electromechanical Coupling Coefficient of Lithium Niobate Crystal with Different Orientations”, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1637 012064, 2020 (Year: 2020). |
Gnewuch, et al. “Broadband monolithic acousto-optic tunable filter”, Mar. 1, 2000 / vol. 25, No. 5 / Optics Letters (Year: 2000). |
Kadota et al., “Ultra-Wideband Ladder Filter Using SH0 Plate Wave in Thin LiNbO3 Plate and Its Application to Tunable Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 62, No. 5, May 2015, pp. 939-946 (Year: 2015). |
Lin et al., “A novel weighted method for layered SAW filters using slanted finger interdigital transducers”, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 (2006) pp. 466-470 (Year: 2006). |
M. Kadota et al.; “Ultrawide Band Ladder Filter using SH0 plate Wave in Thin LiNb03 Plate and its Application”; 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, 2014, pp. 2031-2034. (Year: 2014). |
M.-H. Li et al.; “Temperature Stability Analysis of Thin-Film Lithium Niobate SH0 Plate Wave Resonators”; Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 28, No. 5, Oct. 2019, pp. 799-809. (Year: 2019). |
Reinhardt, “Acoustic filters based on thin single crystal LiNbQ,3 films: status and prospects”, 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, pp. 773-781 (Year: 2014). |
Sinha et al., “Slanted finger Inter-digital Transducers for the design of improved performance small shape factor mid-bandwidth SAW filters”, IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and RF Conference, 2013. (Year: 2013). |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/024824 dated Jul. 27, 2021, 9 total pages. |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/048505 dated Dec. 1, 2021, 11 total pages. |
Wu et al., “Frequency band-gap measurement of two-dimensional air/silicon phononic crystals using layered slanted finger interdigital transducers”, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 094916, 2005 (Year: 2005). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220352867 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63208503 | Jun 2021 | US | |
63191897 | May 2021 | US | |
63187932 | May 2021 | US | |
63182465 | Apr 2021 | US |