Patent Grant
11996826
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. This patent document may show and/or describe matter which is or may become trade dress of the owner. The copyright and trade dress owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright and trade dress rights whatsoever.
This disclosure relates to radio frequency filters using acoustic wave resonators, and specifically to filters for use in communications equipment.
A radio frequency (RF) filter is a two-port device configured to pass some frequencies and to stop other frequencies, where “pass” means transmit with relatively low signal loss and “stop” means block or substantially attenuate. The range of frequencies passed by a filter is referred to as the “pass-band” of the filter. The range of frequencies stopped by such a filter is referred to as the “stop-band” of the filter. A typical RF filter has at least one pass-band and at least one stop-band. Specific requirements on a passband or stop-band depend on the specific application. For example, a “pass-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the insertion loss of a filter is better than a defined value such as 1 dB, 2 dB, or 3 dB. A “stop-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the rejection of a filter is greater than a defined value such as 20 dB, 30 dB, 40 dB, or greater depending on application.
RF filters are used in communications systems where information is transmitted over wireless links. For example, RF filters may be found in the RF front-ends of cellular base stations, mobile telephone and computing devices, satellite transceivers and ground stations, IoT (Internet of Things) devices, laptop computers and tablets, fixed point radio links, and other communications systems. RF filters are also used in radar and electronic and information warfare systems.
RF filters typically require many design trade-offs to achieve, for each specific application, the best compromise between performance parameters such as insertion loss, rejection, isolation, power handling, linearity, size and cost. Specific design and manufacturing methods and enhancements can benefit simultaneously one or several of these requirements.
Performance enhancements to the RF filters in a wireless system can have broad impact to system performance. Improvements in RF filters can be leveraged to provide system performance improvements such as larger cell size, longer battery life, higher data rates, greater network capacity, lower cost, enhanced security, higher reliability, etc. These improvements can be realized at many levels of the wireless system both separately and in combination, for example at the RF module, RF transceiver, mobile or fixed sub-system, or network levels.
The desire for wider communication channel bandwidths will inevitably lead to the use of higher frequency communications bands. The current LTE™ (Long Term Evolution) specification defines frequency bands from 3.3 GHz to 5.9 GHz. These bands are not presently used. Future proposals for wireless communications include millimeter wave communication bands with frequencies up to 28 GHz.
High performance RF filters for present communication systems commonly incorporate acoustic wave resonators including surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators, bulk acoustic wave (BAW) resonators, film bulk acoustic wave resonators (FBAR), and other types of acoustic resonators. However, these existing technologies are not well-suited for use at the higher frequencies proposed for future communications networks.
Throughout this description, elements appearing in figures are assigned three-digit or four-digit reference designators, where the two least significant digits are specific to the element and the one or two most significant digit is the figure number where the element is first introduced. An element that is not described in conjunction with a figure may be presumed to have the same characteristics and function as a previously-described element having the same reference designator.
Description of Apparatus
The XBAR 100 is made up of a thin film conductor pattern formed on a surface of a piezoelectric plate 110 having parallel front and back surfaces 112, 114, respectively. The piezoelectric plate is a thin single-crystal layer of a piezoelectric material such as lithium niobate, lithium tantalate, lanthanum gallium silicate, gallium nitride, or aluminum nitride. The piezoelectric plate is cut such that the orientation of the X, Y, and Z crystalline axes with respect to the front and back surfaces is known and consistent. In the examples presented in this patent, the piezoelectric plates are Z-cut, which is to say the Z axis is normal to the surfaces. However, XBARs may be fabricated on piezoelectric plates with other crystallographic orientations.
The back surface 114 of the piezoelectric plate 110 is attached to a substrate 120 that provides mechanical support to the piezoelectric plate 110. The substrate 120 may be, for example, silicon, sapphire, quartz, or some other material. The substrate 120 may be a composite of two or more materials. For example, the substrate 120 may be a first material, such as silicon, with an inset island of a second material, such as silicon dioxide or phosphosilicate glass (PSG). The inset island may be subsequently removed to form a cavity, which will be described subsequently. The piezoelectric plate 110 may be bonded to a surface of the substrate 120 using a wafer bonding process, or grown on the substrate 120, or attached to the substrate in some other manner. The piezoelectric plate may be attached directly to the substrate or may be attached to the substrate via an intermediate bonding layer 122. For example, when the substrate 120 is silicon, the bonding layer 122 may be silicon dioxide.
The conductor pattern of the XBAR 100 includes an interdigital transducer (IDT) 130. The IDT 130 includes a first plurality of parallel fingers, such as finger 136, extending from a first busbar 132 and a second plurality of fingers extending from a second busbar 134. The first and second pluralities of parallel fingers are interleaved. The interleaved fingers overlap for a distance AP, commonly referred to as the “aperture” of the IDT. The center-to-center distance L between the outermost fingers of the IDT 130 is the “length” of the IDT.
The first and second busbars 132, 134 serve as the terminals of the XBAR 100. A radio frequency or microwave signal applied between the two busbars 132, 134 of the IDT 130 excites an acoustic wave within the piezoelectric plate 110. As will be discussed in further detail, the excited acoustic wave is a bulk shear wave that propagates in the direction normal to the surface of the piezoelectric plate 110, which is also normal, or transverse, to the direction of the electric field created by the IDT fingers. Thus, the XBAR is considered a transversely-excited film bulk wave resonator.
A cavity 140 is formed in the substrate 120 such that a portion 115 of the piezoelectric plate 110 containing the IDT 130 is suspended over the cavity 140 without contacting the substrate 120. “Cavity” has its conventional meaning of “an empty space within a solid body.” The cavity 140 may be a hole completely through the substrate 120 (as shown in Section A-A and Section B-B) or a recess in the substrate 120 (as shown subsequently in
The portion 115 of the piezoelectric plate suspended over the cavity 140 will be referred to herein as the “diaphragm” (for lack of a better term) due to its physical resemblance to the diaphragm of a microphone. The diaphragm may be continuously and seamlessly connected to the rest of the piezoelectric plate 110 around all, or nearly all, of perimeter of the cavity 140.
For ease of presentation in
A front-side dielectric layer 214 may optionally be formed on the front side of the piezoelectric plate 110. The “front side” of the XBAR is, by definition, the surface facing away from the substrate. The front-side dielectric layer 214 has a thickness tfd. The front-side dielectric layer 214 is formed between the IDT fingers 238. Although not shown in
The IDT fingers 238 may be aluminum or a substantially aluminum alloy, copper or a substantially copper alloy, beryllium, gold, or some other conductive material. Thin (relative to the total thickness of the conductors) layers of other metals, such as chromium or titanium, may be formed under and/or over the fingers to improve adhesion between the fingers and the piezoelectric plate 110 and/or to passivate or encapsulate the fingers. The busbars (132, 134 in
Dimension p is the center-to-center spacing or “pitch” of the IDT fingers, which may be referred to as the pitch of the IDT and/or the pitch of the XBAR. Dimension w is the width or “mark” of the IDT fingers. The IDT of an XBAR differs substantially from the IDTs used in surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators. In a SAW resonator, the pitch of the IDT is one-half of the acoustic wavelength at the resonance frequency. Additionally, the mark-to-pitch ratio of a SAW resonator IDT is typically close to 0.5 (i.e. the mark or finger width is about one-fourth of the acoustic wavelength at resonance). In an XBAR, the pitch p of the IDT is typically 2 to 20 times the width w of the fingers. In addition, the pitch p of the IDT is typically 2 to 20 times the thickness ts of the piezoelectric slab 212. The width of the IDT fingers in an XBAR is not constrained to one-fourth of the acoustic wavelength at resonance. For example, the width of XBAR IDT fingers may be 500 nm or greater, such that the IDT can be fabricated using optical lithography. The thickness tm of the IDT fingers may be from 100 nm to about equal to the width w. The thickness of the busbars (132, 134 in
The XBAR 300 shown in
The primary difference between the XBAR device 400A and the XBAR 100 of
The cavities 440A are formed by using an etch process to remove material from the substrate. The etch process may be a “wet” process using a liquid etchant, or a “dry” process such as reactive ion etching or sputter etching that use a gaseous etchant. As represented by the dashed arrow 460A, the etch process proceeds from the back surface of the substrate and progressively removes material from the substrate until the cavities 440A are formed. In the absence of the etch-stop layer 450, at least a portion of the back surface 414 of the piezoelectric plate 410 would be exposed to the etch process 460. The performance of the XBAR 400A is sensitive to the thickness of the piezoelectric and, to at least some extent, to the smoothness of the back surface 414. Any erosion of the back surface 414 by the etch process 460 may have a deleterious effect on the performance of the XBAR 400A.
The etch-stop layer 450 protects the back surface 414 from the etch process. To this end, the etch-stop layer 450 is impervious to the etch process represented by the dashed arrow 460A. The word “impervious” has several definitions including “not affected by” and “not allowing fluid to pass though”. Both of these definitions apply to the etch-stop layer 450. The etch-stop layer is not materially affected by the etch process and does not allow the liquid or gaseous etchant used in the etch process to penetrate to the piezoelectric layer 410. The etch-stop layer need not be inert with respect to the etchant but must be highly resistant to the etchant such that a substantial portion of the etch stop layer remains after completion of the cavity etch. The remaining etch stop layer 450 is not removed after the cavities 440A are formed and becomes a portion of the diaphragms of the XBAR devices.
The etch-stop layer 450 is formed from an etch-stop material. The etch-stop material must be a dielectric with very low conductivity and low acoustic loss. The etch-stop material must have high adhesion to the surface(s) on which it is formed. Further, the etch-stop material must be compatible with attaching the piezoelectric plate to the substrate with a wafer bonding process. Most importantly, the etch-stop material must be impervious, as previously defined, to the processes and chemicals used to etch the substrate material. Suitable etch-stop materials may include oxides such as aluminum oxide and silicon dioxide, sapphire, nitrides including silicon nitride, aluminum nitride, and boron nitride, silicon carbide, and diamond.
When the etch-stop material is a high thermal conductivity dielectric, such as aluminum nitride, boron nitride, or diamond, the etch-stop layer will help conduct heat away from the diaphragm of the XBAR.
As described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,491,192, a dielectric layer 470 may be selectively formed on the front side of the piezoelectric plate 410 over the IDTs 430 of some XBARs. For example, a frequency setting dielectric layer may be formed over the IDTs of shunt resonators to lower their resonant frequencies with respect to the resonant frequencies of series resonators in a filter. The electromechanical coupling efficiency of an XBAR may be reduced and spurious modes may be enhanced if the total thickness of dielectric layers on the front and back surfaces of the piezoelectric plate exceeds about 35% of the piezoelectric plate thickness. Further, filters designed for broad communications bands such as band N77 and band N79 may require a frequency setting layer with a thickness of 20% to 30% of the piezoelectric plate thickness. To allow flexibility in selection of the frequency setting layer thickness, the thickness tes of the etch-stop layer 450 may be less than or equal to 10% of the piezoelectric plate thickness, and preferably about 4% to 6% of the piezoelectric plate thickness. When a frequency setting dielectric layer is not used, the thickness tes may be less than about 20% of the piezoelectric plate thickness.
The primary difference between the XBAR device 400B and the XBAR device 400A of
The primary difference between the XBAR device 500A and the XBAR device 400A of
The cavities 540A are formed by using an etch process (represented by the dashed arrow 560A) to remove material from the substrate. The etch process may be a “wet” process using a liquid etchant, or a “dry” process such as reactive ion etching or sputter etching that use a gaseous etchant. The etch process proceeds from the back surface of the substrate and progressively removes material from the substrate until the cavities 540A are opened though the substrate 520. The same or a different etch process may then be used to remove the bonding layer at the top (as shown in
The primary difference between the XBAR device 500B and the XBAR device 500A of
The primary difference between the XBAR device 600A and the XBAR device 400A of
The cavities 640A are formed by using an etch process (represented by the dashed arrow 660A) to remove material from the substrate. The etch-stop layer 650 is impervious to the etch process used to form the cavities. The etch stop layer may be one of the etch-stop materials previously identified.
The primary difference between the XBAR device 600B and the XBAR device 600A of
AN XBAR device may include both a bonding layer (e.g. the bonding layer 522 of
Description of Methods
The flow chart of
The piezoelectric plate may be, for example, lithium niobate or lithium tantalate, in which case the crystalline orientation may be Z-cut, rotated Z-cut, or rotated YX cut. The piezoelectric plate may be some other material and/or some other cut. The substrate may preferably be silicon. The substrate may be some other material that allows formation of deep cavities by etching or other processing.
At 710, a bonding layer may optionally be formed by growing or depositing a bonding material onto a surface of the substrate. The bonding material must be a dielectric with very low conductivity and have high adhesion to the substrate surface. Further, the bonding material must be compatible with attaching the piezoelectric plate to the substrate with a wafer bonding process. For example, when the substrate is silicon, the bonding material may silicon dioxide that is grown or deposited on the substrate. A bonding layer is not necessarily required on a silicon substrate. Other substrate materials, such a glass, quartz, and sapphire may not require a bonding layer.
At 715, a back-side dielectric layer may optionally be formed by depositing a dielectric material onto a back surface of the piezoelectric plate. The back-side dielectric must be a dielectric material with very low conductivity and have high adhesion to the surface of the piezoelectric plate. Further, the back-side dielectric material must have specific acoustic properties to enhance the function of the XBAR device. For example, the back-side dielectric material may be silicon dioxide which may lower the temperature coefficient of frequency of the XBAR device.
At 720, an etch stop layer is formed by depositing an etch-stop material on the back surface of the piezoelectric plate (or the back surface of the back-side dielectric layer if present), the surface of the substrate (over the bonding layer if present), or both. The etch-stop material may be deposited using atomic layer deposition (ALD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD), or some other process. The etch-stop material must be a dielectric with very low conductivity and low acoustic loss. The etch-stop material must have high adhesion to the surface(s) on which it is deposited. Further, the etch-stop material must be compatible with attaching the piezoelectric plate to the substrate with a wafer bonding process. Importantly, the etch-stop material must be impervious to the processes and chemicals used to etch the substrate material and, if present, the bonding layer.
At 730, the piezoelectric plate is bonded to the substrate. The piezoelectric plate and the substrate may be bonded by a wafer bonding process. When the etch-stop layer is deposited on the piezoelectric plate, the wafer bond occurs between the etch-stop layer and the bonding layer, if present, or the substrate. When the etch-stop layer is deposited on the bonding layer, if present, or the substrate, the wafer bond occurs between the etch-stop layer and the piezoelectric plate. One or both mating surfaces may be activated using, for example, a plasma process. The mating surfaces may then be pressed together with considerable force to establish molecular bonds between the piezoelectric plate and the substrate or intermediate material layers.
A conductor pattern, including IDTs of each XBAR, is formed at 740 by depositing and patterning one or more conductor layers on the front side of the piezoelectric plate. The conductor layer may be, for example, aluminum, an aluminum alloy, copper, a copper alloy, or some other conductive metal. Optionally, one or more layers of other materials may be disposed below (i.e. between the conductor layer and the piezoelectric plate) and/or on top of the conductor layer. For example, a thin film of titanium, chrome, or other metal may be used to improve the adhesion between the conductor layer and the piezoelectric plate. A conduction enhancement layer of gold, aluminum, copper or other higher conductivity metal may be formed over portions of the conductor pattern (for example the IDT bus bars and interconnections between the IDTs).
The conductor pattern may be formed at 740 by depositing the conductor layer and, optionally, one or more other metal layers in sequence over the surface of the piezoelectric plate. The excess metal may then be removed by etching through patterned photoresist. The conductor layer can be etched, for example, by plasma etching, reactive ion etching, wet chemical etching, and other etching techniques.
Alternatively, the conductor pattern may be formed at 740 using a lift-off process. Photoresist may be deposited over the piezoelectric plate. and patterned to define the conductor pattern. The conductor layer and, optionally, one or more other layers may be deposited in sequence over the surface of the piezoelectric plate. The photoresist may then be removed, which removes the excess material, leaving the conductor pattern.
At 750, one or more front-side dielectric layers may be formed by depositing one or more layers of dielectric material on the front side of the piezoelectric plate. The one or more dielectric layers may be deposited using a conventional deposition technique such as sputtering, evaporation, or chemical vapor deposition. The one or more dielectric layers may be deposited over the entire surface of the piezoelectric plate, including on top of the conductor pattern. Alternatively, one or more lithography processes (using photomasks) may be used to limit the deposition of the dielectric layers to selected areas of the piezoelectric plate, such as only between the interleaved fingers of the IDTs. Masks may also be used to allow deposition of different thicknesses of dielectric materials on different portions of the piezoelectric plate.
In a first variation of the process 700, one or more cavities are formed in the back side of the substrate at 760A. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. The one or more cavities may be formed using an anisotropic or orientation-dependent dry or wet etch to open holes through the back-side of the substrate to the piezoelectric plate. In this case, the resulting resonator devices will have a cross-section as shown in
In a second variation of the process 700, one or more cavities in the form of recesses in the substrate may be formed at 760B by etching the substrate using an etchant introduced through openings in the piezoelectric plate and the etch-stop layer. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. The one or more cavities formed at 760B will not penetrate through the substrate, and the resulting resonator devices will have a cross-section as shown in
In all variations of the process 700, the filter device is completed at 770. Actions that may occur at 770 include depositing an encapsulation/passivation layer such as SiO2 or Si3N4 over all or a portion of the device; forming bonding pads or solder bumps or other means for making connection between the device and external circuitry; excising individual devices from a wafer containing multiple devices; other packaging steps; and testing. Another action that may occur at 770 is to tune the resonant frequencies of the resonators within the device by adding or removing metal or dielectric material from the front side of the device. After the filter device is completed, the process ends at 795.
Closing Comments
Throughout this description, the embodiments and examples shown should be considered as exemplars, rather than limitations on the apparatus and procedures disclosed or claimed. Although many of the examples presented herein involve specific combinations of method acts or system elements, it should be understood that those acts and those elements may be combined in other ways to accomplish the same objectives. With regard to flowcharts, additional and fewer steps may be taken, and the steps as shown may be combined or further refined to achieve the methods described herein. Acts, elements and features discussed only in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from a similar role in other embodiments.
As used herein, “plurality” means two or more. As used herein, a “set” of items may include one or more of such items. As used herein, whether in the written description or the claims, the terms “comprising”, “including”, “carrying”, “having”, “containing”, “involving”, and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of”, respectively, are closed or semi-closed transitional phrases with respect to claims. Use of ordinal terms such as “first”, “second”, “third”, etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements. As used herein, “and/or” means that the listed items are alternatives, but the alternatives also include any combination of the listed items.
This patent is a continuation of application Ser. No. 16/933,224, titled TRANSVERSELY-EXCITED FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR WITH ETCH-STOP LAYER, filed Jul. 20, 2020, which claims priority to provisional patent application 62/978,133, titled XBAR WITH AL203 ETCH-STOP AND BONDING LAYER, filed Feb. 18, 2020, and provisional patent application 62/993,586, titled THIN FILM LAYER TO IMPROVE POWER OF XBAR RESONATORS, filed Mar. 23, 2020.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5853601 | Krishaswamy et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 6540827 | Levy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6707229 | Martin | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6833774 | Abbott et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 7042132 | Bauer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7463118 | Jacobsen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7535152 | Ogami et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7684109 | Godshalk et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7868519 | Umeda | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7939987 | Solal et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
| 8278802 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8344815 | Yamanaka | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8829766 | Milyutin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8932686 | Hayakawa et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 9112134 | Takahashi | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9130145 | Martin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9219466 | Meltaus et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9240768 | Nishihara et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9276557 | Nordquist et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
| 9369105 | Li | Jun 2016 | B1 |
| 9425765 | Rinaldi | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9525398 | Olsson | Dec 2016 | B1 |
| 9564873 | Kadota | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9748923 | Kando et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9780759 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 10200013 | Bower et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10389391 | Ito et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10491192 | Plesski et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
| 10601392 | Plesski et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10637438 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10756697 | Plesski et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10790802 | Yantchev et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10797675 | Plesski | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10819309 | Turner et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
| 10826462 | Plesski et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10868510 | Yantchev | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10868512 | Garcia et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10911023 | Turner | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10985728 | Plesski et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 10998882 | Yantchev et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
| 11146232 | Yandrapalli et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
| 11201601 | Yantchev et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
| 11323089 | Turner | May 2022 | B2 |
| 11418167 | Garcia | Aug 2022 | B2 |
| 20020079986 | Ruby et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020158714 | Kaitila et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030128081 | Ella et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030199105 | Kub et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040041496 | Imai et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040207033 | Koshido | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040207485 | Kawachi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040261250 | Kadota et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050099091 | Mishima et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20060131731 | Sato | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20070090898 | Kando | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070115079 | Kubo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070188047 | Tanaka | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070194863 | Shibata et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070222007 | Van Beek | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296304 | Fujii et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080169884 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080297280 | Thalhammer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090315640 | Umeda et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100064492 | Tanaka | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100123367 | Tai et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100212127 | Heinze et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223999 | Onoe | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100301703 | Chen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110102107 | Onzuka | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110109196 | Goto | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20130057360 | Meltaus et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130207747 | Nishii et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130234805 | Takahashi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130271238 | Onda et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130321100 | Wang | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140009032 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140009247 | Moriya | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140113571 | Fujiwara et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140145556 | Kadota | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140151151 | Reinhardt | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140152145 | Kando et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140173862 | Kando et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140225684 | Kando et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140312994 | Meltaus et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150014795 | Franosch et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150244149 | Van Someren | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150319537 | Perois et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150333730 | Meltaus | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160028367 | Shealy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160036415 | Ikeuchi | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160049920 | Kishino | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160079958 | Burak | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160149554 | Nakagawa | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160182009 | Bhattacharjee | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20170063332 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170104470 | Koelle et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170179928 | Raihn et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170187352 | Omura | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170201232 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170214385 | Bhattacharjee | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170214387 | Burak et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170214389 | Tsutsumi | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170222622 | Solal et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170264266 | Kishimoto | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170290160 | Takano et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170359050 | Irieda et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170370791 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180013400 | Ito et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180013405 | Takata | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180123016 | Gong et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180152169 | Goto et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180191322 | Chang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180212589 | Meltaus et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180309426 | Guenard et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180316333 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180358948 | Gong et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190007022 | Goto et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190068155 | Kimura et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190068164 | Houlden et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190123721 | Takamine | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190131953 | Gong | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190181825 | Schmalzl et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190181833 | Nosaka | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190207583 | Miura et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190245518 | Ito | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190273480 | Lin | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190348966 | Campanella-Pineda et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190386633 | Plesski | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20200021271 | Plesski | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200021272 | Segovia Fernandez et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200244247 | Maeda | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200274520 | Shin et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200295729 | Yantchev | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200304091 | Yantchev | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200321939 | Turner et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200328728 | Nakagawa et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200373907 | Garcia | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20210273631 | Jachowski et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| 20210313951 | Yandrapalli et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
| 20210328575 | Hammond et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
| 20220103160 | Jachowski et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
| 20220116015 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
| 20220123720 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
| 20220123723 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
| 20220149808 | Dyer et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
| 20220149814 | Garcia et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 106788318 | May 2017 | CN |
| 110417373 | Nov 2019 | CN |
| 210431367 | Apr 2020 | CN |
| 113765495 | Dec 2021 | CN |
| H10209804 | Aug 1998 | JP |
| 2001244785 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2002300003 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2003078389 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2004096677 | Mar 2004 | JP |
| 2004129222 | Apr 2004 | JP |
| 2004523179 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2004304622 | Oct 2004 | JP |
| 2006173557 | Jun 2006 | JP |
| 2007251910 | Sep 2007 | JP |
| 2007329584 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2010062816 | Mar 2010 | JP |
| 2010103803 | May 2010 | JP |
| 2010154505 | Jul 2010 | JP |
| 2010233210 | Oct 2010 | JP |
| 2013528996 | Jul 2013 | JP |
| 2013214954 | Oct 2013 | JP |
| 2015054986 | Mar 2015 | JP |
| 2016001923 | Jan 2016 | JP |
| 2017526254 | Sep 2017 | JP |
| 2017220910 | Dec 2017 | JP |
| 2018093487 | Jun 2018 | JP |
| 2018166259 | Oct 2018 | JP |
| 2018207144 | Dec 2018 | JP |
| 2019186655 | Oct 2019 | JP |
| 2020113939 | Jul 2020 | JP |
| 2010047114 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2013021948 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2015098694 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| 2016017104 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| 2016052129 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| 2016147687 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| 2017188342 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| 2018003268 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| 2018003273 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| 2018163860 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| 2019117133 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| 2019138810 | Jul 2019 | WO |
| 2020092414 | May 2020 | WO |
| 2020100744 | May 2020 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| T. Takai, H. Iwamoto, et al., “I.H.P.Saw Technology and its Application to Microacoustic Components (Invited).” 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sep. 6-9, 2017. pp. 1-8. |
| R. Olsson III, K. Hattar et al. “A high electromechanical coupling coefficient SHO Lamb wave lithiumniobate micromechanical resonator and a method for fabrication” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 209, Mar. 1, 2014, pp. 183-190. |
| M. Kadota, S. Tanaka, “Wideband acoustic wave resonators composed of hetero acoustic layer structure,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 57, No. 7S1. Published Jun. 5, 2018. 5 pages. |
| Y. Yang, R. Lu et al. “Towards Ka Band Acoustics: Lithium Niobat Asymmetrical Mode Piezoelectric MEMS Resonators”, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, May 2018. pp. 1-2. |
| Y. Yang, A. Gao et al. “5 GHZ Lithium Niobate MEMS Resonators With High FOM of 153”, 2017 IEEE 30th International Conference in Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). Jan. 22-26, 2017. pp. 942-945. |
| USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/036433 dated Aug. 29, 2019. |
| USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/058632 dated Jan. 17, 2020. |
| G. Manohar, “Investigation of Various Surface Acoustic Wave Design Configurations for Improved Sensitivity.” Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, USA, Jan. 2012, 7 pages. |
| Ekeom, D. & Dubus, Bertrand & Volatier, A.. (2006). Solidly mounted resonator (SMR) FEM-BEM simulation. 1474-1477. 10.1109/ULTSYM.2006.371. |
| Mizutaui, K. and Toda, K., “Analysis of lamb wave propagation characteristics in rotated Y-cut X-propagation LiNbO3 plates.” Electron. Comm. Jpn. Pt. 1, 69, No. 4 (1986): 47-55. doi:10.1002/ecja.4410690406. |
| Naumenko et al., “Optimal orientations of Lithium Niobate for resonator SAW filters”, 2003 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium—pp. 2110-2113. (Year: 2003). |
| Webster Dictionary Meaning of “diaphragm” Merriam Webster since 1828. |
| Chen et al., “Development and Application of SAW Filter,” Micromachines, Apr. 20, 2022, vol. 13, No. 656, pp. 1-15. |
| Herrmann et al., “Properties of shear-horizontal surface acoustic waves in different layered quartz-SiO2 structures,” Ultrasonics, 1999, vol. 37, pp. 335-341. |
| Lam et al., “A Review of Lame and Lamb Mode Crystal Resonators for Timing Applications and Prospects of Lame and Lamb Mode Piezo MEMS Resonators for Filtering Applications,” 2018 International Symposium on Acoustic Wave Devices for Future Mobile Communication Systems, Mar. 6-7, 2018, 12 pages. |
| Abass et al., “Effects of inhomogeneous grain size distribution in polycrystalline silicon solar cells,” Energy Procedia, 2011, vol. 10, pp. 55-60. |
| Gnewuch et al., “Broadband monolithic acousto-optic tunable filter,” Optics Letters, Mar. 2000, vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 305-307. |
| Gorisse et al., “Lateral Field Excitation of membrane-based Aluminum Nitride resonators,” 2011 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control and the European Frequency and Time Forum (FCS) Proceedings, 2011, 5 pages. |
| Kadota et al., “Ultra Wideband Ladder Filter Using SH0 Plate Wave in Thin LiNbO3 Plate and Its Application to Tunable Filter,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2015, vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 939-946. |
| Pang et al., “Self-Aligned Lateral Field Excitation Film Acoustic Resonator with Very Large Electromechanical Coupling,” 2004 IEEE International Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control Joint 50th Anniversary Conference, 2004, pp. 558-561. |
| Reinhardt et al., “Acoustic filters based on thin single crystal LiNbO3 films: status and prospects,” IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sep. 2014, pp. 773-781. |
| Xue et al., “High Q Lateral-Field-Excited Bulk Resonator Based on Single-Crystal LiTaO3 for 5G Wireless Communication,” Journal of Electron Devices Society, Mar. 2021, vol. 9, pp. 353-358. |
| Yandrapalli et al., “Toward Band n78 Shear Bulk Accoustic Resonators Using Crystalline Y-Cut Lithium Niobate Films wit Spurious Suppression,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Aug. 2023, vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 327-334. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210257990 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62993586 | Mar 2020 | US | |
| 62978133 | Feb 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16933224 | Jul 2020 | US |
| Child | 17115765 | US |
