A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. This patent document may show and/or describe matter which is or may become trade dress of the owner. The copyright and trade dress owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright and trade dress rights whatsoever.
This disclosure relates to radio frequency filters using acoustic wave resonators, and specifically to bandpass filters for use in communications equipment.
A radio frequency (RF) filter is a two-port device configured to pass some frequencies and to stop other frequencies, where “pass” means transmit with relatively low signal loss and “stop” means block or substantially attenuate. The range of frequencies passed by a filter is referred to as the “pass-band” of the filter. The range of frequencies stopped by such a filter is referred to as the “stop-band” of the filter. A typical RF filter has at least one pass-band and at least one stop-band. Specific requirements on a passband or stop-band depend on the specific application. For example, a “pass-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the insertion loss of a filter is better than a defined value such as 1 dB, 2 dB, or 3 dB. A “stop-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the rejection of a filter is greater than a defined value such as 20 dB, 30 dB, 40 dB, or greater depending on application.
RF filters are used in communications systems where information is transmitted over wireless links. For example, RF filters may be found in the RF front-ends of cellular base stations, mobile telephone and computing devices, satellite transceivers and ground stations, IoT (Internet of Things) devices, laptop computers and tablets, fixed point radio links, and other communications systems. RF filters are also used in radar and electronic and information warfare systems.
RF filters typically require many design trade-offs to achieve, for each specific application, the best compromise between performance parameters such as insertion loss, rejection, isolation, power handling, linearity, size and cost. Specific design and manufacturing methods and enhancements can benefit simultaneously one or several of these requirements.
Performance enhancements to the RF filters in a wireless system can have broad impact to system performance. Improvements in RF filters can be leveraged to provide system performance improvements such as larger cell size, longer battery life, higher data rates, greater network capacity, lower cost, enhanced security, higher reliability, etc. These improvements can be realized at many levels of the wireless system both separately and in combination, for example at the RF module, RF transceiver, mobile or fixed sub-system, or network levels.
High performance RF filters for present communication systems commonly incorporate acoustic wave resonators including surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators, bulk acoustic wave (BAW) resonators, film bulk acoustic wave resonators (FBAR), and other types of acoustic resonators. However, these existing technologies are not well-suited for use at the higher frequencies and bandwidths proposed for future communications networks.
The desire for wider communication channel bandwidths will inevitably lead to the use of higher frequency communications bands. Radio access technology for mobile telephone networks has been standardized by the 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project). Radio access technology for 5th generation mobile networks is defined in the 5G NR (new radio) standard. The 5G NR standard defines several new communications bands. Two of these new communications bands are n77, which uses the frequency range from 3300 MHz to 4200 MHz, and n79, which uses the frequency range from 4400 MHz to 5000 MHz. Both band n77 and band n79 use time-division duplexing (TDD), such that a communications device operating in band n77 and/or band n79 use the same frequencies for both uplink and downlink transmissions. Bandpass filters for bands n77 and n79 must be capable of handling the transmit power of the communications device. WiFi bands at 5 GHz and 6 GHz also require high frequency and wide bandwidth. The 5G NR standard also defines millimeter wave communication bands with frequencies between 24.25 GHz and 40 GHz.
The Transversely-Excited Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator (XBAR) is an acoustic resonator structure for use in microwave filters. The XBAR is described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,491,291, titled TRANSVERSELY EXCITED FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR. An XBAR resonator comprises an interdigital transducer (IDT) formed on a thin floating layer, or diaphragm, of a single-crystal piezoelectric material. The IDT includes a first set of parallel fingers, extending from a first busbar and a second set of parallel fingers extending from a second busbar. The first and second sets of parallel fingers are interleaved. A microwave signal applied to the IDT excites a shear primary acoustic wave in the piezoelectric diaphragm. XBAR resonators provide very high electromechanical coupling and high frequency capability. XBAR resonators may be used in a variety of RF filters including band-reject filters, band-pass filters, duplexers, and multiplexers. XBARs are well suited for use in filters for communications bands with frequencies above 3 GHz.
Throughout this description, elements appearing in figures are assigned three-digit or four-digit reference designators, where the two least significant digits are specific to the element and the one or two most significant digit is the figure number where the element is first introduced. An element that is not described in conjunction with a figure may be presumed to have the same characteristics and function as a previously-described element having the same reference designator.
Description of Apparatus
The XBAR 100 is made up of a thin film conductor pattern formed on a surface of a piezoelectric plate 110 having parallel front and back surfaces 112, 114, respectively. The piezoelectric plate is a thin single-crystal layer of a piezoelectric material such as lithium niobate, lithium tantalate, lanthanum gallium silicate, gallium nitride, or aluminum nitride. The piezoelectric plate is cut such that the orientation of the X, Y, and Z crystalline axes with respect to the front and back surfaces is known and consistent. In the examples presented in this patent, the piezoelectric plates are Z-cut, which is to say the Z axis is normal to the front and back surfaces 112, 114. However, XBARs may be fabricated on piezoelectric plates with other crystallographic orientations including rotated Z-cut and rotated Y-cut.
The back surface 114 of the piezoelectric plate 110 is attached to a surface of the substrate 120 except for a portion of the piezoelectric plate 110 that forms a diaphragm 115 spanning a cavity 140 formed in the substrate. The portion of the piezoelectric plate that spans the cavity is referred to herein as the “diaphragm” 115 due to its physical resemblance to the diaphragm of a microphone. As shown in
The substrate 120 provides mechanical support to the piezoelectric plate 110. The substrate 120 may be, for example, silicon, sapphire, quartz, or some other material or combination of materials. The back surface 114 of the piezoelectric plate 110 may be bonded to the substrate 120 using a wafer bonding process. Alternatively, the piezoelectric plate 110 may be grown on the substrate 120 or attached to the substrate in some other manner. The piezoelectric plate 110 may be attached directly to the substrate or may be attached to the substrate 120 via one or more intermediate material layers (not shown in
“Cavity” has its conventional meaning of “an empty space within a solid body.” The cavity 140 may be a hole completely through the substrate 120 (as shown in Section A-A and Section B-B) or a recess in the substrate 120 under the diaphragm 115. The cavity 140 may be formed, for example, by selective etching of the substrate 120 before or after the piezoelectric plate 110 and the substrate 120 are attached.
The conductor pattern of the XBAR 100 includes an interdigital transducer (IDT) 130. The IDT 130 includes a first plurality of parallel fingers, such as finger 136, extending from a first busbar 132 and a second plurality of fingers extending from a second busbar 134. The first and second pluralities of parallel fingers are interleaved. The interleaved fingers overlap for a distance AP, commonly referred to as the “aperture” of the IDT. The center-to-center distance L between the outermost fingers of the IDT 130 is the “length” of the IDT.
The first and second busbars 132, 134 serve as the terminals of the XBAR 100. A radio frequency or microwave signal applied between the two busbars 132, 134 of the IDT 130 excites a primary acoustic mode within the piezoelectric plate 110. As will be discussed in further detail, the primary acoustic mode is a bulk shear mode where acoustic energy propagates along a direction substantially orthogonal to the surface of the piezoelectric plate 110, which is also normal, or transverse, to the direction of the electric field created by the IDT fingers. Thus, the XBAR is considered a transversely-excited film bulk wave resonator.
The IDT 130 is positioned on the piezoelectric plate 110 such that at least the overlapping portions of the fingers of the IDT 130 are disposed on the diaphragm 115 that spans, or is suspended over, the cavity 140. As shown in
For ease of presentation in
A front-side dielectric layer may optionally be formed on the front side of the piezoelectric plate 110. The “front side” of the XBAR is, by definition, the surface facing away from the substrate. The front-side dielectric layer may be formed only between the IDT fingers or may be deposited as a blanket layer such that the dielectric layer is formed both between and over the IDT fingers. The front-side dielectric layer may be a non-piezoelectric dielectric material, such as silicon dioxide or silicon nitride. The thickness of the front side dielectric layer is typically less than or equal to the thickness of the piezoelectric plate. The front-side dielectric layer may be formed of multiple layers of two or more materials.
Communications devices operating in time-domain duplex (TDD) bands transmit and receive in the same frequency band. Both the transmit and receive signal paths pass through a common bandpass filter connected between an antenna and a transceiver. Communications devices operating in frequency-domain duplex (FDD) bands transmit and receive in different frequency bands. The transmit and receive signal paths pass through separate transmit and receive bandpass filters connected between an antenna and the transceiver. Filters for use in TDD bands or filters for use as transmit filters in FDD bands can be subjected to radio frequency input power levels of 30 dBm or greater and must avoid damage under power.
The required insertion loss of acoustic wave bandpass filters is usually not more than a few dB. Some portion of this lost power is return loss reflected back to the power source; the rest of the lost power is dissipated in the filter. Typical band-pass filters for LTE bands have surface areas of 1.0 to 2.0 square millimeters. Although the total power dissipation in a filter may be small, the power density can be high given the small surface area. Further, the primary loss mechanisms in an acoustic filter are resistive losses in the conductor patterns and acoustic losses in the IDT fingers and piezoelectric material. Thus, the power dissipation in an acoustic filter is concentrated in the acoustic resonators. To prevent excessive temperature increase in the acoustic resonators, the heat due to the power dissipation must be conducted away from the resonators through the filter package to the environment external to the filter.
In traditional acoustic filters, such as surface acoustic wave (SAW) filters and bulk acoustic wave (BAW) filters, the heat generated by power dissipation in the acoustic resonators is efficiently conducted through the filter substrate and the metal electrode patterns to the package. In an XBAR device, the resonators are disposed on thin piezoelectric diaphragms that are inefficient heat conductors. The large majority of the heat generated in an XBAR device must be removed from the resonator via the IDT fingers and associated conductor patterns.
The electric resistance of the IDT fingers can be reduced, and the thermal conductivity of the IDT fingers can be increased, by increasing the cross-sectional area of the fingers to the extent possible. Unlike SAW or BAW, for XBAR there is little coupling of the primary acoustic mode to the IDT fingers. Changing the width and/or thickness of the IDT fingers has minimal effect on the primary acoustic mode in an XBAR device. This is a very uncommon situation for an acoustic wave resonator. However, the IDT finger geometry does have a substantial effect on coupling to spurious acoustic modes, such as higher order shear modes and plate modes that travel laterally in the piezoelectric diaphragm.
Dimension p is the center-to-center spacing or “pitch” of the IDT fingers, which may be referred to as the pitch of the IDT and/or the pitch of the XBAR. Dimension w is the width or “mark” of the IDT fingers. In an XBAR, the pitch p of the IDT is typically 2 to 20 times the width w of the fingers. In addition, the pitch p of the IDT is typically 2 to 20 times a thickness is of the piezoelectric slab 212. The width of XBAR IDT fingers may be 500 nm or greater, such that the IDT can be readily fabricated using optical lithography. A total thickness tm of the IDT fingers may be from 100 nm to about equal to the width w. The thickness of the busbars (132, 134 in
The finger 136 has a lower first layer 230 proximate (e.g., very close to) a top surface of the diaphragm 110, which is substantially parallel to the bottom surface. The first layer 230 can be in contact with the piezoelectric plate 110. Alternatively, a relatively thin layer (in comparison with the thickness of the first layer), such as an adhesion layer, can be between the first layer 230 and the diaphragm, which may facilitate coupling or bonding of the first layer 230 to the diaphragm 110. The first layer 230 has sidewalls extending at a sidewall angle Θ1 to the diaphragm 110, where Θ1 can be in a range from 70 degrees to 110 degrees. The cross-section is an inverted trapezoid when Θ1 is greater than 90.
The finger 136 has a second layer 240 on the first layer 230 opposite the diaphragm 110. The second layer 240 also has sidewalls extending away from the diaphragm 210 at a sidewall angle Θ2, where Θ2 can be in a range from 70 degrees to 110 degrees.
Θ1 and Θ2 may be the same or different. The width of the first layer 230 can be greater or less than the width of the second layer 240.
The thicknesses of the first layer 230 and second layer 240 can be the same or different from each other. For example, the thickness of first layer 230 may be less than the thickness of the second layer 240. The thickness of each of the metal layers can be less than one-half of the acoustic wavelength and preferably about one-quarter of the acoustic wavelength within each metal layer at the resonance frequency. The acoustic wavelength in each metal layer can be determined by dividing the velocity of the primary shear mode in the metal by the frequency. Precise control of the thickness is not required so long as the acoustic reflections from the interfaces between the layers tend to cancel rather than add. Since the thickness of the diaphragm is about one-half of the acoustic wavelength at the resonance frequency, each of the thicknesses of the first layer 230 and second layer 240 can be in a range from about 25% to about 75% of the thickness of the diaphragm.
The first layer 230 and second layer 240 are formed of different materials. The first layer 230 may be a metal with low transverse acoustic impedance. Transverse acoustic impedance is the product of the density and velocity of the primary shear acoustic mode. The second layer 240 may be a material having high transverse acoustic impedance such that the acoustic waves are confined below the second layer 240. Aluminum (Al) and titanium (Ti) have low transverse acoustic impedance and are suitable for use in the first layer. Chromium and tungsten have high transverse acoustic impedance and are suitable for the second layer.
Thin (relative to the total thickness of the conductors) layers of other metals, such as chromium or titanium, may be formed under and/or over and/or as layers within the fingers to improve adhesion between the fingers and the piezoelectric plate 110 and/or to passivate or encapsulate the fingers.
As will be further discussed below, simulations of XBAR devices with combinations of metal layers including Al/Cr and Al/W indicate the two-layer electrode structure provides reduced spurious modes and improved anti-resonance Q compared to similar devices with single-layer electrodes having about the same thickness.
An acoustic resonator based on shear acoustic wave resonances can achieve better performance than current state-of-the art film-bulk-acoustic-resonators (FBAR) and solidly-mounted-resonator bulk-acoustic-wave (SMR BAW) devices where the electric field is applied in the thickness direction. Such devices are usually based on AlN thin films with the C axis of the AlN perpendicular to the surfaces of the film. The acoustic mode is compressive with atomic motions and the direction of acoustic energy flow in the thickness direction. In addition, the piezoelectric coupling for shear wave XBAR resonances can be high (>20%) compared to other acoustic resonators. High piezoelectric coupling enables the design and implementation of microwave and millimeter-wave filters with appreciable bandwidth.
The three series resonators X1, X3, X5 and the two shunt resonators X2, X4 of the filter 400 maybe formed on a single plate 430 of piezoelectric material bonded to a silicon substrate (not visible). Each resonator includes a respective IDT (not shown), with at least the fingers of the IDT disposed over a cavity in the substrate. In this and similar contexts, the term “respective” means “relating things each to each”, which is to say with a one-to-one correspondence. In
Each of the resonators X1 to X5 has a resonance frequency and an anti-resonance frequency. In simplified terms, each resonator is effectively a short circuit at its resonance frequency and effectively an open circuit at its anti-resonance frequency. Each resonator X1 to X5 creates a “transmission zero”, where the transmission between the in and out ports of the filter is very low. Note that the transmission at a “transmission zero” is not actually zero due to energy leakage through parasitic components and other effects. The three series resonators X1, X3, X5 create transmission zeros at their respective anti-resonance frequencies (where each resonator is effectively an open circuit). The two shunt resonators X2, X4 create transmission zeros at their respective resonance frequencies (where each resonator is effectively a short circuit). In a typical band-pass filter using acoustic resonators, the anti-resonance frequencies of the series resonators create transmission zeros above the passband, and the resonance frequencies of the shunt resonators create transmission zeros below the passband.
The FOMs of
Two-layer fingers with a low acoustic impedance underlayer and a thicker high acoustic impedance center layer are effective at reducing spurious modes and may provide higher thermal and electrical conductivity than a single-layer fingers. Using two metal layers can move/suppress spurious modes and provide higher electrical and thermal conductivity. Two-layer fingers can provide better electrical and thermal conductivity than single-layer fingers.
Description of Methods
The flow chart of
The piezoelectric plate may be, for example, lithium niobate or lithium tantalate, and may be Z-cut, rotated Z-cut, rotated YX-cut, or some other cut. The substrate may preferably be silicon. The substrate may be some other material that allows formation of deep cavities by etching or other processing.
In one variation of the process 1100, one or more cavities are formed in the substrate at 1110A, before the piezoelectric plate is bonded to the substrate at 1120. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. The one or more cavities may be formed using conventional photolithographic and etching techniques. Typically, the cavities formed at 1110A will not penetrate through the substrate.
At 1120, the piezoelectric plate is bonded to the substrate. The piezoelectric plate and the substrate may be bonded by a wafer bonding process. Typically, the mating surfaces of the substrate and the piezoelectric plate are highly polished. One or more layers of intermediate materials, such as an oxide or metal, may be formed or deposited on the mating surface of one or both of the piezoelectric plate and the substrate. One or both mating surfaces may be activated using, for example, a plasma process. The mating surfaces may then be pressed together with considerable force to establish molecular bonds between the piezoelectric plate and the substrate or intermediate material layers.
A conductor pattern, including two-layer IDT fingers of each XBAR, is formed at 1130 by depositing and patterning conductor layers on the front side of the piezoelectric plate. The first conductor layer may be, for example, aluminum (Al) and titanium (Ti), which have low transverse acoustic impedance. The second conductor layer may be, for example, chromium and tungsten, which have high transverse acoustic impedance. Optionally, one or more layers of other materials may be disposed below (i.e. between the conductor layer and the piezoelectric plate), between layers of the conduction layer, and/or on top of the conductor layer. For example, a thin film of titanium, chrome, or other metal may be used to improve the adhesion between the conductor layer and the piezoelectric plate. A conduction enhancement layer of gold, aluminum, copper or other higher conductivity metal may be formed over portions of the conductor pattern (for example the IDT bus bars and interconnections between the IDTs).
The conductor pattern may be formed at 1130 by depositing one or both of the conductor layers and, optionally, one or more other metal layers in sequence over the surface of the piezoelectric plate. The excess metal may then be removed by etching through patterned photoresist. The conductor layer can be etched, for example, by plasma etching, reactive ion etching, wet chemical etching, and other etching techniques.
Alternatively, one or both of the conductor layers may be formed at 1130 using a lift-off process. Photoresist may be deposited over the piezoelectric plate. and patterned to define the conductor pattern. The conductor layers and, optionally, one or more other layers may be deposited in sequence over the surface of the piezoelectric plate. The photoresist may then be removed, which removes the excess material, leaving the conductor pattern.
The conductor layers may be deposited and patterned separately. In particular, different patterning processes (i.e. etching or lift-off) may be used on different layers and different masks are required where two or more layers have different widths or shapes.
At 1140, a front-side dielectric layer may be formed by depositing one or more layers of dielectric material on the front side of the piezoelectric plate. The one or more dielectric layers may be deposited using a conventional deposition technique such as sputtering, evaporation, or chemical vapor deposition. The one or more dielectric layers may be deposited over the entire surface of the piezoelectric plate, including on top of the conductor pattern. Alternatively, one or more lithography processes (using photomasks) may be used to limit the deposition of the dielectric layers to selected areas of the piezoelectric plate, such as only between the interleaved fingers of the IDTs. Masks may also be used to allow deposition of different thicknesses of dielectric materials on different portions of the piezoelectric plate.
In a second variation of the process 1100, one or more cavities are formed in the back side of the substrate at 1110B. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. The one or more cavities may be formed using an anisotropic or orientation-dependent dry or wet etch to open holes through the back side of the substrate to the piezoelectric plate. In this case, the resulting resonator devices will have a cross-section as shown in
In the second variation of the process 1100, a back-side dielectric layer may be formed at 1150. In the case where the cavities are formed at 1110B as holes through the substrate, the back-side dielectric layer may be deposited through the cavities using a conventional deposition technique such as sputtering, evaporation, or chemical vapor deposition.
In a third variation of the process 1100, one or more cavities in the form of recesses in the substrate may be formed at 1110C by etching the substrate using an etchant introduced through openings in the piezoelectric plate. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device.
In all variations of the process 1100, the filter device is completed at 1160. Actions that may occur at 1160 include depositing an encapsulation/passivation layer such as SiO2 or Si3O4 over all or a portion of the device; forming bonding pads or solder bumps or other means for making connection between the device and external circuitry; excising individual devices from a wafer containing multiple devices; other packaging steps; and testing. Another action that may occur at 1160 is to tune the resonant frequencies of the resonators within the device by adding or removing metal or dielectric material from the front side of the device. After the filter device is completed, the process ends at 1195.
Throughout this description, the embodiments and examples shown should be considered as exemplars, rather than limitations on the apparatus and procedures disclosed or claimed. Although many of the examples presented herein involve specific combinations of method acts or system elements, it should be understood that those acts and those elements may be combined in other ways to accomplish the same objectives. With regard to flowcharts, additional and fewer steps may be taken, and the steps as shown may be combined or further refined to achieve the methods described herein. Acts, elements and features discussed only in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from a similar role in other embodiments.
As used herein, “plurality” means two or more. As used herein, a “set” of items may include one or more of such items. As used herein, whether in the written description or the claims, the terms “comprising”, “including”, “carrying”, “having”, “containing”, “involving”, and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of”, respectively, are closed or semi-closed transitional phrases with respect to claims. Use of ordinal terms such as “first”, “second”, “third”, etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements. As used herein, “and/or” means that the listed items are alternatives, but the alternatives also include any combination of the listed items.
This patent claims priority from provisional patent application 63/031,209, filed May 28, 2020, entitled XBAR WITH DUAL METAL ELECTRODES, and provisional patent application 63/043,672, filed Jun. 24, 2020, entitled XBAR WITH MULTIPLE LAYER METAL ELECTRODES, which are both incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5446330 | Eda et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5552655 | Stokes et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5726610 | Allen et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5853601 | Krishaswamy et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6377140 | Ehara et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6516503 | Ikada et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540827 | Levy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6707229 | Martin | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6710514 | Ikada et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7345400 | Nakao et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7463118 | Jacobsen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7535152 | Ogami et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7684109 | Godshalk et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7728483 | Tanaka | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7868519 | Umeda | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7941103 | Iwamoto et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8278802 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8294330 | Abbott et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8344815 | Yamanaka | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8816567 | Zuo et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8829766 | Milyutin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8932686 | Hayakawa et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9093979 | Wang | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9130145 | Martin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9219466 | Meltaus et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9276557 | Nordquist et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9369105 | Li | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9425765 | Rinaldi | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9525398 | Olsson | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9640750 | Nakanishi et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9748923 | Kando et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9762202 | Thalmayr et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9780759 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9837984 | Khlat et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10079414 | Guyette et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10187039 | Komatsu et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10200013 | Bower et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10211806 | Bhattacharjee | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10284176 | Solal | May 2019 | B1 |
10491192 | Plesski et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10601392 | Plesski et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10637438 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10644674 | Takamine | May 2020 | B2 |
10756697 | Plesski et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10790802 | Yantchev et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10797675 | Plesski | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10826462 | Plesski et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10868512 | Garcia et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10917070 | Plesski et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
20020079986 | Ruby et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020158714 | Kaitila et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020189062 | Lin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030080831 | Naumenko et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030199105 | Kub et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040100164 | Murata | May 2004 | A1 |
20040261250 | Kadota et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050185026 | Noguchi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050218488 | Matsuo | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050264136 | Tsutsumi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060179642 | Kawamura | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070182510 | Park | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188047 | Tanaka | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194863 | Shibata et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070267942 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080246559 | Ayazi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090121584 | Nishimura | May 2009 | A1 |
20100064492 | Tanaka | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100123367 | Tai et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110018389 | Fukano et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018654 | Bradley et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110109196 | Goto | May 2011 | A1 |
20110278993 | Iwamoto | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120286900 | Kadota et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130234805 | Takahashi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130271238 | Onda | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130278609 | Stephanou et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130321100 | Wang | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140130319 | Iwamoto | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145556 | Kadota | May 2014 | A1 |
20140151151 | Reinhardt | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140152145 | Kando | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173862 | Kando et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140225684 | Kando et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150042417 | Onodera et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150319537 | Perois et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150333730 | Meltaus | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160028367 | Shealy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160079958 | Burak | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160182009 | Bhattacharjee | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170052174 | Branch | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170063332 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170179928 | Raihn et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170214381 | Bhattacharjee | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170214387 | Burak et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170222617 | Mizoguchi | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170222622 | Solal et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170358730 | Kishimoto | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170370791 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180005950 | Watanabe | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180026603 | Iwamoto | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180033952 | Yamamoto | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180062615 | Kato et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180062617 | Yun et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180123016 | Gong et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180191322 | Chang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190068164 | Houlden et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190081613 | Nosaka | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190123721 | Takamine | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131953 | Gong | May 2019 | A1 |
20190273480 | Lin | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190305751 | Mimura | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190348966 | Campanella-Pineda | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200036357 | Mimura | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200235719 | Yantchev et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2016017104 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2018003273 | Jan 2018 | WO |
2018116602 | Jun 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
T. Takai, H. Iwamoto, et al., “I.H.P.Saw Technology and its Application to Microacoustic Components (Invited).” 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sept. 6-9, 2017. pp. 1-8. |
R. Olsson III, K. Hattar et al. “A high electromechanical coupling coefficient SH0 Lamb wave lithiumniobate micromechanical resonator and a method for fabrication” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 209, Mar. 1, 2014, pp. 183-190. |
M. Kadota, S. Tanaka, “Wideband acoustic wave resonators composed of hetero acoustic layer structure,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 57, No. 7S1. Published Jun. 5, 2018. 5 pages. |
Y. Yang, R. Lu et al. “Towards Ka Band Acoustics: Lithium Niobat Asymmetrical Mode Piezoelectric MEMS Resonators”, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, May 2018. pp. 1-2. |
Y. Yang, A. Gao et al. “5 GHz Lithium Niobate MEMS Resonators With High FOM of 153”, 2017 IEEE 30th International Conference in Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). Jan. 22-26, 2017. pp. 942-945. |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/036433 dated Aug. 29, 2019. |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/058632 dated Jan. 17, 2020. |
G. Manohar, “Investigation of Various Surface Acoustic Wave Design Configurations for Improved Sensitivity.” Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, USA, Jan. 2012, 7 pages. |
Ekeom, D. & Dubus, Bertrand & Volatier, A.. (2006). Solidly mounted resonator (SMR) FEM-BEM simulation. 1474-1477. 10.1109/ULTSYM.2006.371. |
Mizutaui, K. and Toda, K., “Analysis of lamb wave propagation characteristics in rotated Y-cut X-propagation LiNbO3 plates.” Electron. Comm. Jpn. Pt. I, 69, No. 4 (1986): 47-55. doi:10.1002/ecja.4410690406. |
Naumenko et al., “Optimal orientations of Lithium Niobate for resonator SAW filters”, 2003 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium—pp. 2110-2113. (Year: 2003). |
Webster Dictionary Meaning of “diaphragm” Merriam Webster since 1828. |
Safari et al. “Piezoelectric for Transducer Applications” published by Elsevier Science Ltd., pp. 4 (Year: 2000). |
Moussa et al. Review on Triggered Liposomal Drug Delivery with a Focus on Ultrasound 2015, Bentham Science Publishers, pp. 16 (Year 2005). |
Acoustic Properties of Solids ONDA Corporation 592 Weddell Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94089, Apr. 11, 2003, pp. 5 (Year 2003). |
Bahreynl, B. Fabrication and Design of Resonant Microdevices Andrew William, Inc. 2018, NY (Year 2008). |
Material Properties of Tibtech Innovations, @ 2018 Tibtech Innovations (Year 2018). |
Buchanan “Ceramit Materials for Electronics” 3rd Edition, first published in 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 496 (Year 2004). 00 Jan. 2004. |
Sorokin et al. Study of Microwave Acoustic Attenuation in a Multi-frequency Bulk Acoustic Resonator Based on a Synthetic Diamond Single Crystal Published in Acoustical Physics, vol. 61, No. 6, 2015 pp. 675 (Year 2015) 00 Jan. 2015. |
Zou, Jie “High-Performance Aluminum Nitride Lamb Wave Resonators for RF Front-End Technology” University of California, Berkeley, Summer 2015, pp. 63 (Year 2015) 00 Jan. 2015. |
Santosh, G. , Surface acoustic wave devices on silicon using patterned and thin film ZnO, Ph.D. thesis, Feb. 2016, Indian Institute of technology Guwahati, Assam, India Feb. 2016. |
Kadota et al. “5.4 Ghz Lamb Wave Resonator on LiNbO3 Thin Crystal Plate and Its Application,” published in Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 50 (2011) 07HD11. (Year: 2011) 2011. |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/45654 dated Oct. 29, 2020. 2020. |
Namdeo et al. “Simulation on Effects of Electrical Loading due to Interdigital Transducers in Surface Acoustic Wave Resonator”, published in Procedia Engineering 64 ( 2013) of Science Direct pp. 322-330 (Year: 2013) 2013. |
Rodriguez-Madrid et al., “Super-High-Frequency SAW Resonators on AIN/Diamond”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 33, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 495-497. Year: 2012) 2012. |
A. C. Guyette, “Theory and Design of Intrinsically Switched Multiplexers With Optimum Phase Linearity,” in IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 61, No. 9, pp. 3254-3264, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2013.2274963. Sep. 2013. |
Yanson Yang, Ruochen Lu, Songbin Gong, High Q Antisymmetric Mode Lithium Niobate MEMS Resonators With Spurious Mitigation, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 29, No. 2, Apr. 2020. Apr. 2, 2020. |
Yu-Po Wong, Luyan Qiu, Naoto Matsuoka, Ken-ya Hashimoto, Broadband Piston Mode Operation for First-order Antisymmetric Mode Resonators, 2020 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sep. 2020. Sep. 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210376814 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63043672 | Jun 2020 | US | |
63031209 | May 2020 | US |