Transversely expandable minimally invasive intervertebral cage

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11911292
  • Patent Number
    11,911,292
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 1, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 27, 2024
    8 months ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • Octagon Spine LLC (Bellevue, WA, US)
  • Examiners
    • Harvey; Julianna N
    Agents
    • Merchant & Gould P.C.
Abstract
Disclosed herein are systems and methods for intervertebral body fusion that provide more robust support within the disc space. Intervertebral body fusion devices can have a unitary monolithic body including a plurality of body segments interconnected with each other by flexure members. Devices be configured to be inserted through an opening in a compressed configuration and then expanded within the disc space to an expanded configuration. In the expanded configuration, devices can have a greater mediolateral or transverse to the disc space footprint. This wider footprint provides greater support for the vertebrae relative to the size of the opening through which the device is inserted.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to the fusion of vertebral bodies. More specifically, the present invention relates to devices and associated methods for fusion of vertebral bodies that provide robust spinal support in a less invasive manner.


BACKGROUND

The concept of intervertebral fusion for the cervical and lumbar spine following a discectomy was generally introduced in the 1960s. It involved coring out a bone graft from the hip and implanting the graft into the disc space. The disc space was prepared by coring out the space to match the implant. The advantages of this concept were that it provided a large surface area of bone to bone contact and placed the graft, under loading forces that allowed osteoconduction and induction enhancing bone fusion. However, the technique is seldom practiced today due to numerous disadvantages including lengthy operation time, destruction of a large portion of the disc space, high risk of nerve injury, and hip pain after harvesting the bone graft.


Presently, at least two devices are commonly used to perform the intervertebral portion of an intervertebral body fusion: the first is the distraction device and the second is the intervertebral body fusion device, often referred to as a cage. Cages can be implanted as standalone devices or as part of a circumferential fusion approach with pedicle screws and rods. The concept is to introduce a distraction device that will distract a collapsed disc in a generally axial direction, decompress the nerve root, and allow load sharing to enhance bone formation, and then implant an intervertebral fusion device that is small enough to allow implantation with minimal retraction and pulling on nerves.


In a typical intervertebral body fusion procedure, a portion of the intervertebral disc is first removed from between the vertebral bodies. This can be done through either a direct open approach or a minimally invasive approach. Disc shavers, pituitary rongeours, curettes, and/or disc scrapers can be used to remove the nucleus and a portion of either the anterior or posterior annulus to allow implantation and access to the inner disc space. The distraction device is inserted into the cleared space to enlarge the disc space such that the vertebral bodies are separated in a generally axial direction by actuating the distraction device. Enlarging the disc space is important because it also opens the foramen where the nerve root exists. It is important that during the distraction process one does not over-distract the facet joints. An intervertebral fusion device is next inserted into the distracted space and bone growth factor, such as autograft, a collagen sponge with bone morphogenetic protein, or other bone enhancing substance may be inserted into the space within the intervertebral fusion device to promote the fusion of the vertebral bodies.


Intervertebral distraction and fusion can be performed through anterior, posted or, oblique, and lateral approaches. Each approach has its own anatomical challenges, but the general concept is to fuse adjacent vertebra in the cervical thoracic or lumbar spine. Devices have been made from various materials. Such materials include cadaveric cancellous bone, carbon fiber, titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Devices have also been made into different shapes such as a bean shape, football shape, banana shape, wedge shape and a threaded cylindrical cage.


As with all minimally invasive surgeries, a primary goal is to provide equivalent or near equivalent treatment as more invasive surgical techniques but with less discomfort, recovery time, etc. for the patient. One problem with minimally invasive intervertebral fusion procedures is that the limited size of the surgical access limits the size of the implant(s) that can be inserted. While devices that are vertically expandable in a generally axial direction have addressed some of these issues by being able to be inserted through a smaller opening and then made taller in a generally axial direction within the disc space, such devices are still limited in the transverse footprint that can be covered within the disc space which can affect the stability of the device within the disc space and limits the area for bone grown.


SUMMARY

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for intervertebral body fusion that provide more robust support within the disc space. Intervertebral body fusion devices can have a unitary monolithic body including a plurality of body segments interconnected with each other by flexure members. Devices be configured to be inserted through an opening in a compressed configuration and then expanded within the disc space to an expanded configuration. In the expanded configuration, devices can have a greater mediolateral or transverse to the disc space footprint. This wider footprint provides greater support for the vertebrae relative to the size of the opening through which the device is inserted.


In one embodiment, an expandable intervertebral body fusion device includes a unitary monolithic body having a plurality of body segments connected to each other with flexure members and an opening defined between the plurality of body segments. The device body can include an anterior body segment, a posterior body segment and one or more mediolateral body segments extending between the anterior body segment and the posterior body segment along both a lateral side and a medial side of the anterior body segment and the posterior body segment. A threaded opening can be formed in one or more of the anterior body segment and the posterior body segment. The body is configured to be mediolaterally expanded from a compressed configuration to an expanded configuration by interaction of an expansion tool with the threaded opening causing the one or more mediolateral body segments on the lateral side and the one or more mediolateral body segments on the medial side to generally move away from each other and expand the opening between the plurality of body segments such that the body forms a greater mediolateral footprint in the expanded configuration than in the compressed configuration.


In one embodiment, a transversely expandable intervertebral body fusion device for a disc space between adjacent vertebra of a spine of a human patient includes a unitary monolithic body configured in size and shape to be implantable in the disc space. The body can have at least four body segments each connected to adjacent body segments by one or more flexure members with the body segments surrounding and collectively defining an opening within a transverse plane bisecting the body. The body segments can include an anterior body segment, a posterior body segment and at least one mediolateral body segment extending between the anterior body segment and the posterior body segment along each of a lateral side and a medial side of the body. A threaded opening can be formed in at least one of the anterior body segment and the posterior body segment. The body can be configured to be mediolaterally expanded from a transversely compressed configuration to a transversely expanded configuration by interaction of an expansion tool with the threaded opening causing the at least one mediolateral body segments on each side to generally move transversely away from each other, thereby expanding the opening of the body and forming a perimeter defined by an outer edge of the body that presents a mediolateral footprint in the expanded configuration that is greater than in the compressed configuration.


The above summary is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the subject matter hereof. The figures and the detailed description that follow more particularly exemplify various embodiments.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Subject matter hereof may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments in connection with the accompanying figures, in which:



FIGS. 1A-1D depict an expandable intervertebral body fusion device in a collapsed configuration according to an embodiment.



FIGS. 2A-2D depict the expandable intervertebral body fusion device of FIGS. 1A-1D in an expanded configuration.



FIGS. 3A-3C depict a portion of the expandable intervertebral body fusion device of FIGS. 2A-2D.



FIG. 4 depicts a schematic representation of an expandable intervertebral body fusion device according to an embodiment being inserted between vertebrae of a patient.



FIGS. 5A-5B depict a schematic representation of an expandable intervertebral body fusion device according to an embodiment inserted between vertebrae of a patient in a compressed and an expanded configuration.



FIGS. 6A-6B depict an expandable intervertebral body fusion device and a corresponding insertion device according to an embodiment.



FIGS. 7A-7F depict portions of an insertion device for an expandable intervertebral body fusion device according to an embodiment.



FIGS. 8A-8C depict portions of an insertion device for an expandable intervertebral body fusion device according to an embodiment.



FIGS. 9A-9I depict portions of an insertion device and an expandable intervertebral body fusion device according to an embodiment





While various embodiments are amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the claimed inventions to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the subject matter as defined by the claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A-1D and 2A-2D depict an expandable intervertebral body fusion device 100 according to an embodiment. FIGS. 1A-1D depict the device 100 in a collapsed configuration and FIGS. 2A-2D depict the device 100 in an expanded configuration. In practice, the device 100 is inserted into the disc space through a minimally invasive access in the collapsed configuration and then expanded inside of the disc space. In embodiments, the device 100 is inserted between adjacent vertebrae 10 on its side as depicted in FIG. 4 such that when it is expanded in the disc space rather than expanding vertically it expands horizontally/transversely to the disc space to enable the device to take up a larger footprint within the disc space as can be seen contrasting FIG. 5A and FIG. 5B. The device is therefore able to occupy more lateral to medial and anterior to posterior space within the disc space relative to the size of the access that has heretofore been possible. In one embodiment in its insertion and un-expanded state the device is 8 mm in height, 11.5 mm in width and 26 mm in length. The device can have many heights from 8 mm up to 16 mm. In embodiments, the width can go from 8-12 mm and the length from 22 mm-32 mm. When the device is expanded, the height remains the same but the width can double or nearly double (from 11.5 to 22 mm or 47%) and the length goes from 26 mm to 20 mm (16% decrease). The device can have many lordotic angles from 0 to 15 degrees or higher; the most common being 0, 6, 12 degrees. The horizontal top and bottom of the device can have different shapes to better fit the endplates such as football shaped or domed. Also, the different segments of the device separated by flexures could be tailored or cut by wire EDM or 3D printed to create different horizontal expanded states such as oval, elliptical, circular, bean shaped, banana shaped or many other polygons and non-polygon shapes. The mean disc height at the L3-4 level is 11.3 mm+/−1.8 mm, L4-5 11.3+/−2.1 mm and L5-S1 10.7+/−2.1 mm. The average circumference of the L4 endplate is about 141 mm and surface area 1,492 mm2 above. The device can have difference foot prints to try to fill the endplate or disc space circumference. Referring now to FIGS. 1A-1D, device 100 can include a device body 102. Generally, device body 102 can be unitarily formed as a single monolithic construct, although multiple component embodiments are also contemplated. Device body 102 can include upper 104a and lower 104b bearing surfaces. As noted above, device 100 can be inserted generally on its side such that bearing surfaces 104a, 104b interface with and bear the forces of the adjacent vertebrae 10 (see FIGS. 4 and 5A-5B). In embodiments, the larger threaded opening 126 are positioned dorsal or posterior and the smaller opening 124 is positioned ventral or anterior. Device body 102 can include a plurality of mediolateral body segments 106 unitary connected to each other by flexure 108 comprising a thin, flexible strip of material. As can be seen in, e.g., FIGS. 1C-1D, mediolateral body segments 106 and flexures 108 can perform a continuous, unitary out perimeter surface 110. Device body 102 can further include an anterior body segment 112 and posterior body segment 114. Anterior and posterior body segments 112, 114 can also be connected with mediolateral body segments by flexures 108. Device body 102 further defines an open interior 116 between the body segments.


In the depicted embodiment, the device 100 includes three mediolateral body segments 106 on each side such that the device includes a total of eight body segments. In some embodiments, a device having eight body segments may be generally octagonally shaped in the expanded configuration as depicted in FIGS. 2A-2D. In other embodiments, device may have greater or fewer mediolateral body segments on each side.


Device body 102 can further include a plurality of locking flexures 118 disposed in the open interior 116. As can be seen in, e.g., FIGS. 1C-1D, locking flexures 118 can extend from a lock base 120 that is recessed with respect to bearing surfaces 104a, 104b. As will be described in more detail below, each locking flexure 118 corresponds with locking projection 122 extending from an adjacent body segment 106.


Each of anterior body segment 112 and posterior body segment 114 can include a threaded opening that aids in insertion and expansion of device. In one embodiment, anterior body segment 112 includes an anterior threaded opening 124 configured to interface with a stabilizing element for inserting the device 100 into the disc space. Posterior body segment 114 can include a posterior threaded opening 126 that is larger than anterior opening 124 and can be configured to interface with an expansion element that is rotated to expand device body 112, which will be described in more detail below. In other embodiments, anterior opening 124 may interface with the expansion elements while posterior opening 126 interfaces with the stabilizing element. In some embodiments, anterior body segment 112 can be tapered to facilitate insertion of the device 100 into the disc space through the minimally invasive access opening.



FIGS. 2A-2D depict device 100 in an expanded configuration. As the device 100 is expanded, the mediolateral body segments 106 on opposing sides of the device body 102 are moved away from each other causing the device to expand medially and laterally within the disc space. When the device 100 is expanded, the locking flexures 118 interface and lock with the locking projections 122 to prevent external forces from causes the device to compress from the expanded position following expansion. As can be seen in more detail in FIGS. 3A-3C, each locking flexure 118 includes a pointed tip 128 that interfaces with a notch 130 in locking projections to lock the components together.


As noted above, in one embodiment device 100 is inserted between adjacent vertebrae 10 on its side, as shown in FIG. 4, with bearing surfaces 104a, 104b configured to interface with the vertebrae. FIGS. 5A-5B depict how the device 100 can be inserted in a collapsed configuration and then expanded within the disc space to occupy a greater footprint within the disc space. Note that these figures show one particular access approach and device orientation relative to the disc space, but that other access approaches and device orientations are possible. FIGS. 6A-6B depict device 100 with an insertion device 200 used to insert and expand device 100 within the disc space according to an embodiment. As will be described in more detail below, insertion device 200 generally includes a stabilizing component 204 and an expansion component 202. Expansion component 202 includes a knob 209 configured to be rotated to secure the expansion component 202 to intervertebral device 100 and a dial 208 configured to be rotated to expand intervertebral device 100, as discussed in more detail below.


Stabilizing component 204 includes a handle 206 configured to be rotated to secure the component to device 100. FIGS. 7A-7E depict further detail regarding the components of insertion device 200.


Expansion component 202 includes a body 224, a shaft 222 extending from the body 224, a flange 226 at the distal end of shaft 222 and a distal threaded tip 228. Shaft 222 and body 224 include internal lumens that enable passage of shaft body 214 of stabilizing component 204 to pass through expansion component 202. Distal tip 228 is sized to be rotatingly received by posterior or proximal threaded opening 126 of device. Flange 226 is wider than shaft 222 and threaded tip 228 to prevent expansion component 204 from being over-inserted when attached to expandable device 100. Knob 209 and dial 208 are selectively attachable to expansion component 202 via, for example, a rotational coupling with knob 209 and with a screw 220 for dial 208. Dial 208 can also include a threaded portion 221 configured to interface with a proximal threaded portion 212 of shaft 210. A lock 230 can be selectively insert into a lock aperture 232 through body 224 of expansion component 202 to lock rotation of stabilizing component 204 with respect to expansion component 202, as will be discussed in more detail below. Lock 230 can be selectively held in place with screw 234.


Stabilizing component 204 includes a shaft 210 extending from handle 206. Shaft 210 includes a proximal threaded portion 212 configured to interface with dial 208, a shaft body 214 configured to be extended through the expansion component 202, an implant extension 216 configured to extend through the implantable device 100 during implantation, and a threaded tip 218. Shaft 210 further includes a lock slot 236 configured to interface with lock 230.


Lock 230 includes a handle 238 and a lock body 240. Lock body 240 is configured to be inserted through lock aperture 232 in body 224 of stabilizing component 202. Lock body 240 further includes a recessed portion 242 having a reduced diameter that interfaces with the lock slot 236 in shaft body 214 of shaft 210. Recessed portion 242 of lock body 240 further includes a cutout 244 that allows for limited rotation of shaft body 214 when lock 230 is engaged with shaft 210.



FIGS. 8A-8C further depict the interrelation of the components of inserter 200. Dial 208 is threaded onto proximal threaded portion 212 of stabilizing component 204. Shaft 210 of stabilizing component is inserted through expansion component 202 with implant extension 216 and threaded tip 218 extending distally from expansion component 202. Proximal end of expansion component 202 is secured to dial 208 with screw 220. Lock 230 can be selectively inserted into aperture 232 and through lock slot 236 in shaft 210.



FIGS. 9A-9I depict further details regarding the interaction between inserter 200 and expandable device 100. First, the distal tip 228 of the expansion component 202 is engaged with the posterior threaded opening 126 of implantable device 100 and the knob 209 is rotated to secure the tip 228 to the opening 126. If not already done so prior to attaching expansion component 202, stabilizing component 204 is inserted through stabilizing component 202 to the distal side of the expandable device 100. The implant extension 216 can be extended through the body of the implant 100 to engage the threaded tip 218 of the stabilizing component 204 to interface with the distal threaded opening 124 of the implant. Handle 206 can be rotated to secure the tip 218 to the opening 124. Lock 230 can now be inserted through slot 232 in expansion component and across slot 236 in shaft 214 of stabilizing component.


The dial 208 of the expansion component 202 can now be rotated to expand the implant 100 within the disc space. Dial 208 is rotated while the user holds the knob 209 such that the dial rotates relative to knob 209. Lock 230 prevents shaft 214 from rotating such that stabilizing component 204 maintains device 100 in a stable position. Dial 208 therefore rotates shaft 222 and distal tip 228 about shaft 214 of stabilizing component 204. This rotation pushes on the proximal or anterior end of device 100 while the distal or posterior end of the device is maintained stable, causing the distance between the anterior and posterior ends of the device to shorten and the device 100 to expand laterally outwardly. As described, above, device expands from the collapsed configuration shown in, e.g., FIGS. 1A, 5A and 6A, to the expanded configuration shown in, e.g., FIGS. 2A, 5B and 6B to cover a wider footprint in the disc space. Implant is therefore able to provide more robust and stable support in the disc space that is laterally wider than the access opening through which the implant is implanted.


As can be seen in FIGS. 9E-9H, the slot 236 in shaft 210 of stabilizing component 204 can also serve to limit an amount that expansion component 202 can be rotated to expand device 100. Referring to FIGS. 9E and 9G, initially the lock 230 is positioned in at a proximal end of slot 236. As the dial 208 is rotated to rotate the shaft 222 to expand the device 100, the dial 208 travels linearly along the threaded portion 212 of the stabilizing component and the lock 230, which is inserted through a locking tube 231 of expansion component that enables shaft 222 to be rotated, is advanced linearly along slot 236. In the fully expanded position, as shown in FIG. 9H, the lock 230 abuts a distal end of the slot 236 such that further rotation of dial 208 with not cause any further linear advancement of shaft 222. The length of the slot 236 can be predetermined based on a desired or actual maximum expansion of the implanted device 100.


Referring to FIG. 9I, the stabilizing component 204 can be removed by rotating handle 206 to disengage the threaded tip 218 from the device and withdrawing the shaft 210 from the expansion component 202. The hollow expansion component 202 can then serve as a funnel to infuse one or more of, for example, bone puddy, demineralized bone matrix, and bone chips into the now empty opening in the device 100 to aid the fusion process. Finally, the expansion component 202 can be disengaged from the implant 100 and removed, leaving the implant in the disc space with, e.g., bone graft in the interior of the device 100.


The typical height opening after a discectomy available to insert the implant can be from 4-14 mm depending on how collapsed the disc space is. One would need disc space distractors either a mechanical device or a lollipop sizer to expand the disc space. The typical width of the surgical path into the disc space after retracting the nerve root could be 10-12 mm. Through a transforaminal interbody approach (TLIF: transforaminal interbody fusion) where you remove the superior and inferior facet you may be able to get an additional 1-2 mm more of working room.


In another embodiment, device can be inserted into the disc space and expanded vertically to expand the disc space, with the flexures locking the device at the expanded height and maintaining the expanded disc space.


Various embodiments of systems, devices, and methods have been described herein. These embodiments are given only by way of example and are not intended to limit the scope of the claimed inventions. It should be appreciated, moreover, that the various features of the embodiments that have been described may be combined in various ways to produce numerous additional embodiments. Moreover, while various materials, dimensions, shapes, configurations and locations, etc. have been described for use with disclosed embodiments, others besides those disclosed may be utilized without exceeding the scope of the claimed inventions.


Persons of ordinary skill in the relevant arts will recognize that the subject matter hereof may comprise fewer features than illustrated in any individual embodiment described above. The embodiments described herein are not meant to be an exhaustive presentation of the ways in which the various features of the subject matter hereof may be combined. Accordingly, the embodiments are not mutually exclusive combinations of features; rather, the various embodiments can comprise a combination of different individual features selected from different individual embodiments, as understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art. Moreover, elements described with respect to one embodiment can be implemented in other embodiments even when not described in such embodiments unless otherwise noted.


Although a dependent claim may refer in the claims to a specific combination with one or more other claims, other embodiments can also include a combination of the dependent claim with the subject matter of each other dependent claim or a combination of one or more features with other dependent or independent claims. Such combinations are proposed herein unless it is stated that a specific combination is not intended.


Any incorporation by reference of documents above is limited such that no subject matter is incorporated that is contrary to the explicit disclosure herein. Any incorporation by reference of documents above is further limited such that no claims included in the documents are incorporated by reference herein. Any incorporation by reference of documents above is yet further limited such that any definitions provided in the documents are not incorporated by reference herein unless expressly included herein.


For purposes of interpreting the claims, it is expressly intended that the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 112(f) are not to be invoked unless the specific terms “means for” or “step for” are recited in a claim.

Claims
  • 1. An expandable intervertebral body fusion device system, comprising: a unitary monolithic body, the body having a plurality of body segments connected to each other with flexure members and an opening defined between the plurality of body segments, including— an anterior body segment and an opposing posterior body segment defining a maximum anterior to posterior width of the body;one or more mediolateral body segments extending between the anterior body segment and the posterior body segment along both a lateral side and a medial side of the anterior body segment and the posterior body segment, the one or more mediolateral body segments defining a maximum mediolateral width of the body;a threaded opening formed in at least one of the anterior body segment and the posterior body segment; andwherein the body is configured to be mediolaterally expanded from a compressed configuration to an expanded configuration by interaction of an expansion tool with the threaded opening causing the one or more mediolateral body segments on the lateral side and the one or more mediolateral body segments on the medial side to generally move away from each other and expand the opening between the plurality of body segments such that the body forms a greater mediolateral footprint in the expanded configuration than in the compressed configuration, andfurther comprising a stabilizing element extending between the anterior body segment and the posterior body segment that limits an amount that the body can be expanded to a predetermined amount.
  • 2. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 1, wherein the threaded opening formed in at least one of the anterior body segment and the posterior body segment is configured to interface with an expansion element configured to be rotated to expand the body to the expanded configuration.
  • 3. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 1, wherein the body further comprises one or more locking flexures configured to lock the body in the expanded configuration.
  • 4. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 3, wherein there is at least one locking flexure extending from at least one mediolateral body segment on each of the lateral side and the medial side, and wherein each locking flexure is configured to interlock with an adjacent body segment.
  • 5. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 3, wherein each locking flexure comprises a flexible elongate body with a locking tip and is configured to interlock with a locking projection extending outwardly from an adjacent body segment.
  • 6. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 1, wherein there are three mediolateral body segments along each of the lateral side and the medial side.
  • 7. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 1, wherein in the expanded configuration the body has a generally polygonal shape.
  • 8. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 7, wherein in the expanded configuration the body has a generally octagonal shape.
  • 9. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 1, wherein in the expanded configuration the mediolateral footprint is approximately doubled in width from the compressed configuration.
  • 10. An expandable intervertebral body fusion device system, comprising: a unitary monolithic body, the body having a plurality of body segments connected to each other with flexure members and an opening defined between the plurality of body segments, including— a first end body segment and an opposing second end body segment defining a maximum end to end width of the body;one or more side body segments extending between the first end body segment and the second end body segment along both a first side and a second side of the first end body segment and the second end body segment, the one or more side body segments defining a maximum side to side width of the body;a threaded opening formed in at least one of the first end body segment and the second end body segment; andwherein the body is configured to be expanded from a compressed configuration to an expanded configuration by interaction of an expansion tool with the threaded opening causing the one or more side body segments on the first side and the one or more side body segments on the second side to generally move away from each other and expand the opening between the plurality of body segments, andfurther comprising a stabilizing element extending between the first end body segment and the second end body segment that limits an amount that the body can be expanded to a predetermined amount.
  • 11. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 10, where the body is configured to be expanded mediolaterally within a disc space such that the body forms a greater mediolateral footprint in the expanded configuration than in the compressed configuration.
  • 12. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 10, wherein the body is configured to be expanded transversely to a disc space to expand the disc space.
  • 13. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 10, wherein the body further comprises one or more locking flexures configured to lock the body in the expanded configuration.
  • 14. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 13, wherein there is at least one locking flexure extending from at least one side body segment on each of the first side and the second side, and wherein each locking flexure is configured to interlock with an adjacent body segment.
  • 15. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 13, wherein each locking flexure comprises a flexible elongate body with a locking tip and is configured to interlock with a locking projection extending outwardly from an adjacent body segment.
  • 16. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 10, wherein there are three side body segments along each of the first side and the second side.
  • 17. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 10, wherein in the expanded configuration the body has a generally polygonal shape.
  • 18. The expandable intervertebral body fusion device system of claim 17, wherein in the expanded configuration the body has a generally octagonal shape.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/292,565 filed Mar. 5, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,234,835 issued Feb. 1, 2022, which is hereby fully incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (269)
Number Name Date Kind
283218 Rycke Aug 1883 A
703251 Haire Jun 1902 A
811344 Wands Jan 1906 A
1388836 Ripsch et al. Aug 1921 A
1500859 Wright Jul 1924 A
1547946 Myers Jul 1925 A
2106088 Tar Jan 1938 A
2231221 Rector Feb 1941 A
2453656 Bullard, III Nov 1948 A
2666334 Nalle Jan 1954 A
2711105 Williams Jun 1955 A
2842976 Young Jul 1958 A
2891408 Burt, Jr. Jun 1959 A
3386128 Vyvyan Jun 1968 A
3449971 Posh Jun 1969 A
3575475 Boerner Apr 1971 A
3596863 Kaspareck Aug 1971 A
3597938 Hellen Aug 1971 A
3700289 Bilinski et al. Oct 1972 A
3700290 Ensinger Oct 1972 A
3708925 Ainoura Jan 1973 A
3709132 Farrell et al. Jan 1973 A
3916596 Hawley Nov 1975 A
3985000 Hartz Oct 1976 A
3988906 Smith Nov 1976 A
4261211 Haberland Apr 1981 A
4396047 Balkus Aug 1983 A
4478109 Kobelt Oct 1984 A
4516303 Kloster May 1985 A
4528864 Craig Jul 1985 A
4559717 Scire et al. Dec 1985 A
4630495 Smith Dec 1986 A
4691586 van Leijenhorst et al. Sep 1987 A
4694703 Routson Sep 1987 A
4869552 Tolleson et al. Sep 1989 A
5133108 Esnault Jul 1992 A
5172442 Bartley et al. Dec 1992 A
5181371 Deworth Jan 1993 A
5196857 Chiappetta et al. Mar 1993 A
5198932 Takamura Mar 1993 A
5222986 Wright Jun 1993 A
5313852 Arena May 1994 A
5374556 Bennett et al. Dec 1994 A
5439377 Milanovich Aug 1995 A
5445471 Wexler et al. Aug 1995 A
5554191 Lahille et al. Sep 1996 A
5645599 Samani Jul 1997 A
5653763 Errico et al. Aug 1997 A
5664457 Nejati Sep 1997 A
5904479 Staples May 1999 A
5960670 Iverson et al. Oct 1999 A
5980252 Samchukov et al. Nov 1999 A
5988006 Fleytman Nov 1999 A
6039761 Li et al. Mar 2000 A
6045579 Hochshuler et al. Apr 2000 A
6056491 Hsu May 2000 A
6080193 Hochshuler et al. Jun 2000 A
6136031 Middleton Oct 2000 A
6175989 Carpentar et al. Jan 2001 B1
6315797 Middleton Nov 2001 B1
6350317 Hao et al. Feb 2002 B1
6378172 Schrage Apr 2002 B1
6395035 Bresina et al. May 2002 B2
6454806 Cohen et al. Sep 2002 B1
6454807 Jackson Sep 2002 B1
6484608 Ziavras Nov 2002 B1
6517772 Woolf Feb 2003 B1
6554526 Egelandsdal Apr 2003 B1
6616695 Crozet et al. Sep 2003 B1
6641614 Wagner et al. Nov 2003 B1
6719796 Cohen et al. Apr 2004 B2
6752832 Neumann Jun 2004 B2
6772479 Hinkley et al. Aug 2004 B2
6802229 Lambert Oct 2004 B1
6808537 Michelson Oct 2004 B2
6863673 Gerbec et al. Mar 2005 B2
6932844 Ralph et al. Aug 2005 B2
6953477 Berry Oct 2005 B2
7018415 McKay Mar 2006 B1
7051610 Stoianovici et al. May 2006 B2
7070598 Lim et al. Jul 2006 B2
7087055 Lim et al. Aug 2006 B2
7201751 Zucherman et al. Apr 2007 B2
7273373 Horiuchi Sep 2007 B2
7308747 Smith et al. Dec 2007 B2
7316381 Häcker et al. Jan 2008 B2
7410201 Wilson et al. Aug 2008 B1
7425103 Perez-Sanchez Sep 2008 B2
7431735 Liu et al. Oct 2008 B2
7435032 Murphey et al. Oct 2008 B1
7547325 Biedermann et al. Jun 2009 B2
7584682 Hsiao Sep 2009 B2
7611538 Belliard et al. Nov 2009 B2
7632281 Errico et al. Dec 2009 B2
7674296 Rhoda et al. Mar 2010 B2
7682376 Trieu Mar 2010 B2
7708779 Edie et al. May 2010 B2
7712389 Wang May 2010 B2
7753958 Gordon et al. Jul 2010 B2
7758645 Studer Jul 2010 B2
7758648 Castleman et al. Jul 2010 B2
7892285 Viker Feb 2011 B2
7896919 Belliard et al. Mar 2011 B2
7901409 Canaveral et al. Mar 2011 B2
7947078 Siegal May 2011 B2
7951199 Miller May 2011 B2
7985256 Grotz et al. Jul 2011 B2
8057549 Butterman et al. Nov 2011 B2
8070813 Grotz et al. Dec 2011 B2
8088163 Kleiner Jan 2012 B1
8192495 Simpson et al. Jun 2012 B2
8303663 Jimenez et al. Nov 2012 B2
8496706 Ragab et al. Jul 2013 B2
8523944 Jimenez et al. Sep 2013 B2
8540452 Jimenez et al. Sep 2013 B2
8628577 Jimenez Jan 2014 B1
8636746 Jimenez et al. Jan 2014 B2
8771360 Jimenez et al. Jul 2014 B2
8795366 Varela Aug 2014 B2
8894712 Varela Nov 2014 B2
8906100 Jimenez Dec 2014 B2
8932302 Jimenez et al. Jan 2015 B2
8940049 Jimenez et al. Jan 2015 B1
9358125 Jimenez et al. Jun 2016 B2
9381092 Jimenez et al. Jul 2016 B2
9445917 Jimenez et al. Sep 2016 B2
9445918 Lin et al. Sep 2016 B1
9474626 Jimenez Oct 2016 B2
9486328 Jimenez Nov 2016 B2
9498270 Jimenez Nov 2016 B2
9668879 Jimenez et al. Jun 2017 B2
9867717 Jimenez Jan 2018 B2
10060469 Jimenez et al. Aug 2018 B2
20020128716 Cohen et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138146 Jackson Sep 2002 A1
20020177897 Michelson Nov 2002 A1
20030077110 Knowles Apr 2003 A1
20030233145 Landry et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040049271 Biedermann et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040111157 Ralph et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040153156 Cohen et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040193158 Lim Sep 2004 A1
20040225364 Richelsoph et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050000228 De Sousa et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033431 Gordon et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050095384 Wittmeyer May 2005 A1
20050113921 An et al. May 2005 A1
20050113924 Buttermann May 2005 A1
20050175406 Perez-Sanchez Aug 2005 A1
20050182416 Lim et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050261769 Moskowitz et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060004447 Mastrorio et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060004455 Leonard et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060025862 Villiers et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060058878 Michelson Mar 2006 A1
20060129244 Ensign Jun 2006 A1
20060149385 McKay Jul 2006 A1
20060184171 Biedermann et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060247781 Francis Nov 2006 A1
20060253201 McLuen Nov 2006 A1
20060293752 Mounmene et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070032791 Greenhalgh et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070049943 Moskowitz et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083267 Miz et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093901 Grotz et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070129730 Woods et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070173826 Canaveral Jul 2007 A1
20070185577 Malek Aug 2007 A1
20070191954 Hansell et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070191958 Abdou Aug 2007 A1
20070198089 Moskowitz et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070219634 Greenhalgh et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070222100 Husted et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225726 Dye et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070250171 Bonin Oct 2007 A1
20070255415 Edie et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282449 de Villiers et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288092 Bambakidis Dec 2007 A1
20070293329 Glimpel et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070293948 Bagga et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080026903 Flugrad et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080077246 Fehling et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080091211 Gately Apr 2008 A1
20080100179 Ruggeri et al. May 2008 A1
20080103601 Biro et al. May 2008 A1
20080114367 Meyer May 2008 A1
20080140207 Olmos Jun 2008 A1
20080147194 Grotz et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154266 Protopsaltis et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161920 Melkent Jul 2008 A1
20080161931 Perez-Cruet et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080168855 Giefer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183204 Greenhalgh et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080188941 Grotz Aug 2008 A1
20080210039 Brun Sep 2008 A1
20080221694 Warnick et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080234736 Trieu et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080243255 Butler Oct 2008 A1
20080281423 Sheffer et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080292392 Voellmer Nov 2008 A1
20080319487 Fielding et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090012564 Chirico et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090076614 Arramon Mar 2009 A1
20090099568 Lowry et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090164017 Sommerich et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090210061 Sledge Aug 2009 A1
20090222100 Cipoletti et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090234362 Blain et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090259316 Ginn et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090299478 Carls et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090306672 Reindel et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004688 Maas et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100076557 Miller Mar 2010 A1
20100082109 Greenhalgh et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100094305 Chang et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100161062 Foley et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100185291 Jimenez et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100192715 Vauchel et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100209184 Jimenez et al. Aug 2010 A1
20110015638 Pischl et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110054616 Kamran et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110093072 Siegal Apr 2011 A1
20110093075 Duplessis et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110112644 Zilberstein et al. May 2011 A1
20110138948 Jimenez et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110160861 Jimenez et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110172774 Varela Jul 2011 A1
20110270398 Grotz et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120010653 Seifert et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029636 Ragab et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120083887 Purcell Apr 2012 A1
20120116518 Grotz et al. May 2012 A1
20120158071 Jimenez et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120185049 Varela Jul 2012 A1
20120226357 Varela Sep 2012 A1
20120271419 Marik Oct 2012 A1
20120290094 Lim et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120303124 McLuen et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120323329 Jimenez et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130053966 Jimenez et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130144388 Emery et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130158664 Palmatier et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130197642 Ernst Aug 2013 A1
20130317615 Jimenez et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140012383 Triplett et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140018924 McManus et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140039622 Glerum et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058512 Petersheim Feb 2014 A1
20140088714 Miller et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140140757 Jimenez et al. May 2014 A1
20140156007 Pabst et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140194991 Jimenez Jul 2014 A1
20140236296 Wagner et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140249629 Moskowitz et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277490 Perloff et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140343608 Whiton et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150018951 Leobl Jan 2015 A1
20150088258 Jimenez et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150100128 Glerum et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150148908 Marino et al. May 2015 A1
20150230929 Lorio Aug 2015 A1
20150272743 Jimenez et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150272745 Jimenez et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150272746 Jimenez et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150351925 Emerick et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160262907 Jimenez Sep 2016 A1
20160356368 Jimenez et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170056200 Koch et al. Mar 2017 A1
20180021149 Boehm et al. Jan 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (28)
Number Date Country
1342456 Sep 2003 EP
1552797 Jul 2005 EP
1881209 Jan 2008 EP
2372998 Dec 1976 FR
05-81194 Apr 1993 JP
2004-301135 Oct 2004 JP
2008-208932 Sep 2008 JP
2014-507167 Mar 2014 JP
WO 2004026188 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004109155 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2005081330 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2005096975 Oct 2005 WO
WO 2006094535 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2006116052 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2006125329 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2007002583 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007009107 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007028140 Mar 2007 WO
WO 2007076377 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007111979 Oct 2007 WO
WO 2008137192 Nov 2008 WO
WO 2009018349 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2010078468 Jul 2010 WO
WO 2010078520 Jul 2010 WO
WO 2011011609 Jan 2011 WO
WO 2011011626 Jan 2011 WO
WO 2012047712 Apr 2012 WO
WO 2014066890 May 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (57)
Entry
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2019433217, 3 pages, dated Oct. 31, 2022.
European Supplemental Search Report for European Application No. 19918341.9, dated Nov. 25, 2022, 14 pages.
Japanese Office Action and English translation for Japanese Application No. 2021-552741, dated Dec. 6, 2022, 4 pages.
PCT/US2010/042941, filed Jul. 22, 2010, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 25, 2011.
PCT/US2010/042915, filed Jul. 22, 2010, Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 22, 2011.
PCT/US2009/069876, filed Dec. 30, 2009, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 27, 2010, 10 pages.
PCT/US2009/069958, filed Dec. 31, 2009, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 29, 2010, 7 pages.
PCT/US2015/055449, filed Oct. 14, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 11, 2015, 9 pages.
PCT/US2015/032977, filed May 28, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 21, 2015, 10 pages.
European Application No. EP 09837185.9, European Search Report dated May 14, 2013, 7 pages.
Japanese Application No. 2012-521784, JP Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2014, 8 pages.
PCT/US2013/067070, PCT Written Opinion/Search Report dated Feb. 27, 2014, 14 pages.
PCT/US2014/052913, PCT Written Opinion/Search Report dated Dec. 22, 2014, 10 pages.
European Application No. EP 10802916.6, Examination Report dated May 12, 2016, 4 pages.
Canadian Application No. 2,768,867, Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2016, 4 pages.
Canadian Application No. 2,768,867, Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2017, 4 pages.
European Application No. EP14887838.2, Extended European Search Report, dated Oct. 25, 2017, 8 pages.
Wenzel Spine, Inc., VariLift®-L Expandable Interbody Fusion Device: A proven solution for stand-alone fusion, Product Overview, 12 pages, 2010.
Peter A. Halverson, et al., Tension-based Multi-stable Compliant: Rolling-contact Elements, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo UT, USA 84602, 34 pages, 2007.
Just L. Herder, Force Directed Design of Laparoscopic Forceps, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 8 pages, 1998.
Alexander H. Slocum, Fundamentals of Design, 2005.
W. Küsswetter, A Supplementary Instrumentation for Posterior Fusion of Spine in Scoliosis, Archives of Orthopedic Traumatic Surgery, 1980, 1 page.
Chou et al., Efficacy of Anterior Cervical Fusion: Comparison of Titanium Cages, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous bone grafts, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2008, pp. 1240-1245.
Amelie Jeanneau, et al., A Compliant Rolling Contact Joint and its Application in a 3-DOF Planar Parallel Mechanism with Kinematic Analysis, ASME, Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 9 pages, 2004.
Hunter et al., Overview of Medical Devices, Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, Aug. 2001, pp. 89-140, vol. 30, No. 4, ISSN: 0363-0188.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., CAPSTONE Instrument Set Technique, http://www.mtortho.com/public/capstone.pdf, © 2005, 25 pages.
Medtronic, Capstone Peek Spinal System Surgical Technique, http://www.mtortho.com/public/capstone_peek st.pdf, © 2009, 36 pages.
Website printout from https://seelio.com/w/fgf/omnilif-the-new-standard-in-spinal-deformity-correction-and-fusion?student-lumbarjax; dated Nov. 27, 2014, 5 pages.
Printout from Video for OmniLIF Anterior Insertion Approach from Lumber Jax; https://seelio.com/w/fgf/omnilif-the-new-standard-in-spinal-deformity-correction-and-fusion?student=lumbarjax; dated Nov. 27, 2014, 7 pages.
Printout from Video for OmniLIF Features from Lumber Jax; https://seelio.com/w/fgf/omnilif-the-new-standard-in-spinal-deformity-correction-and-fusion?student=lumbarjax; dated Nov. 27, 2014, 11 pages.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,608, filed Mar. 19, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,628,577, Inventors Jimenez et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,994, filed Dec. 31, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,523,944, Inventors Jimenez et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/651,266, filed Dec. 31, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,540,452, Inventors Jimenez et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,465, filed Jul. 22, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,303,663, Inventors Jimenez et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,869, filed Jul. 22, 2010, Now U.S. Pat. No. 9,358,125, Inventors Jimenez et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,410, filed Jul. 22, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,636,746, Inventor Jimenez.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,534, filed Oct. 26, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,932,302, Inventor Jimenez.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,463, filed Aug. 22, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,771,360, Inventor Jimenez.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/891,356, filed May 10, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,906,100, Inventor Jimenez et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/024,764, filed Sep. 12, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,381,092, Inventor Jimenez et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/153,281, filed Jan. 13, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,867,717, Inventor Jimenez.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/563,660, filed Dec. 8, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,445,917, Inventor Jimenez et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,451, filed Apr. 1, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,049, Inventor Jimenez et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/318,196, filed Jun. 27, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,474,626, Inventor Jimenez et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/592,507, filed Jan. 8, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,498,270, Inventor Jimenez et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/585,544, filed Dec. 30, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,486,328, Inventor Jimenez et al.
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 15/164,498, filed May 25, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,668,879, Inventors: Jimenez et al.
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,454, filed Jun. 6, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,117,757. Inventors: Jimenez et al.
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,066, filed Oct. 24, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,369,008. Inventors: Jimenez et al.
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 15/591,214, filed May 10, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,052,214. Inventors: Jimenez et al.
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 15/198,557, filed Jun. 30, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,060,469, Inventors: Jimenez et al.
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 16/184,509, filed Nov. 8, 2018. Inventors: Jimenez et al.
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 16/750,784, filed Jan. 23, 2020. Inventors: Jimenez et al.
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 16/292,565, filed Mar. 5, 2019. Inventors: Jimenez et al.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/068890 dated Apr. 29, 2020.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 16/574,265, filed Sep. 18, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,497,622, Inventor Jimenez et al.
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2019433217 dated Oct. 31, 2022, 3 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220226124 A1 Jul 2022 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16292565 Mar 2019 US
Child 17590195 US