The present disclosure will be more fully understood by reference to the following detailed description of one or more preferred embodiments when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The embodiments of the disclosure will be best understood by reference to the drawings, wherein like parts are designated by like numerals throughout. It will be readily understood that the components of the disclosed embodiments, as generally described and illustrated in the figures herein, could be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following detailed description of the embodiments of the systems and methods of the disclosure is not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure, as claimed, but is merely representative of possible embodiments of the disclosure. In addition, the steps of a method do not necessarily need to be executed in any specific order, or even sequentially, nor need the steps be executed only once unless otherwise specified.
In some cases, well-known features, structures or operations are not shown or described in detail. Furthermore, the described features, structures, or operations may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. It will also be readily understood that the components of the embodiments, as generally described and illustrated in the figures herein, could be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations.
The present disclosure pertains to sump pumps and various systems and methods to test the operation of such pumps. In various embodiments, a sump pump may be operable to remove water from a sump pit. Further, a test system may be utilized to periodically confirm the operability of a sump pump installation and alert the owner of a malfunction prior to the sump installation being required to operate to discharge drain water. Such testing may permit an owner to identify and correct any potential impediments to the operation of the system and thereby avoid what might otherwise be a flooding event. In the event the test and monitoring system of the disclosure is utilized in a two pump installation, both pumps are independently tested and monitored, and a failure of either pump, or both pumps, results in an alarm being sounded and appropriate messages being sent to the owner and/or the owners' designee(s) by communications channels such as, for example, the Internet, cell phone data or land line telephone communication channels.
Various embodiments consistent with the present disclosure may include a system for periodically testing the operation of a sump pump using a liquid trap. The liquid trap may permit water to be introduced into a sump pit for the purpose of testing the operation of the sump pump while maintaining a seal that prevents gas from exiting the trap. In various embodiments, the sump pit may be covered and/or sealed, such as an ejector pit. Ejector pits may require a sealed pit cover to block the passage of exhaust gases, smells, liquids and other fluids into an occupied or enclosed area. As described in greater detail below, various embodiments of the present disclosure are configured to permit periodic testing of the sump pumps while the pit cover remains in place.
A waterless trap that complies with the ASME/ANSI A112-18.8 standard may be utilized in various embodiments consistent with the present disclosure. A waterless trap may include a valve or membrane that permits liquid to flow in one direction while creating a seal to liquids or gases flowing in the other direction. In one specific embodiment, the HEPvO® valve available from Hepworth Building Products Limited of Yorkshire England may be utilized.
Systems and methods consistent with the present disclosure may be designed for easy installation in existing single and dual sump pump environments without changes to existing hardware. Such systems may monitor primary and battery backup pumps and periodically test one or more pumps under actual operating conditions by admitting fresh water into the sump pit. In some embodiments, a system may be configured to test the operation of the primary pump and/or backup pump according to a schedule (e.g., every seven days). Further, in some embodiments, tests may be initiated manually.
The system may provide audible and visual alerts regarding various parameters associated with the system. For example, alters may be provided for mechanical and electrical pump failures, power interruptions, water levels, and/or weak backup battery level. In some embodiments, alerts may be communicated electrically through an electronic communications interface. The system may include, for example, an 802.11 interface configured to connect to a Wi-Fi network. Alerts may be sent through the 802.11 interface in the form of email messages, text messages, telephone calls that play a recorded message, etc. Still further, the electronic communications interface may be configured to send status information and/or alerts to an application configured to operate on a mobile device.
One or more sump pumps 106 may be disposed in the sump pit 104. The sump pumps 106 may be in communication with a control module 100. In various embodiments, the sump pumps 106 may be electrically-powered pumps that are designed to be at least partially submerged by water in the sump pit. When activated, sump pumps 106 may discharge water from the sump pit 104 through discharge pipes 108 to a dispersal location, such as a storm sewer or exterior dispersal field.
A float switch 110 may be disposed in the sump pit 104 and may trigger activation of an alarm when the level of water (or other liquid) in the sump pit has reached a predetermined trigger level. The activation point of the float may be set below the lowest inlet 102. The float switch 110 may also typically terminate an alarm when the water in the sump pit 104 falls below a predetermined minimum level below the trigger level. In various embodiments, a check valve (not shown) may be disposed in the discharge pipes 108 to prevent water remaining in the discharge pipes 108 from flowing back into the sump pit 104.
Should one or both of sump pumps 106 fail to operate for any reason (e.g., pump failure, power failure, etc.), any water that cannot be accommodated in the sump pit 104 will eventually overflow from the top of the sump pit and cause a flood. This flooding may cause damage to items stored nearby, to improvements such as finished walls, to floor coverings, etc. In some embodiments, a backup power source 112 may be provided to reduce the likelihood of a flood being caused by a power failure. A secondary switch 158 may be in communication with the backup power source 112 and may be used to activate one of the sump pumps 106 using power from the backup power source 112 during a power outage.
A valve module 116 may be in communication with the control module 100 and a water source 118. The control module 100 may cause the valve module 116 to permit water from the water source 118 to discharge into the sump pit 104 through a tube 120. The water from the valve module 116 may be limited to an amount that is insufficient to completely fill the sump pit 104, but that is sufficient to activate the sump pumps 106. As such, the system may confirm that the sump pumps activate as expected without risking a flood. In the event that the sump pumps fail to activate as expected, control module 100 may alert the owner or operator of the building in which the sump pumps are installed that action is needed to repair the system before any flooding occurs. In various embodiments, the alert may take the form of an audible alert, a visual alert (e.g., activation or blinking of a LED), or a message (e.g., an email, a text message, a recorded message delivered via telephone, etc.). In various embodiments, control module 100 may connect to the Internet through a wired or wireless network interface.
The sump pit 104 may be covered for a variety of reasons, such as building codes and building construction and maintenance practices, by a pit cover 114. Furthermore, in some instances, the sump pit 104 may be an ejector pit that is used to eject sewage to a drain. As noted above, a liquid barrier may be provided to prevent gases and odors from passing from the sump pit 104 into an occupied or enclosed area, such as a home or other building.
A valve module 202 may be used to introduce water into the sump pit 204 containing the pump (not shown) during testing. The valve module 202 may be connected to a water supply line through a supply port 206. A supply valve, which is described in greater detail below, may be actuated to permit water to flow from the supply line into a hose 210 that is connected to a liquid trap housing 222.
The pit cover 214 may include an aperture configured to accept a pipe 208. The pipe 208 may be used to vent liquids or gases from the pit 204. In some embodiments, more than one pipe may be provided. For example, one pipe may extend to an exterior of the enclosed area, such as to an exterior of a building, and another pipe may be connected to a sump pump and may be used to pump water from the pit 204.
A liquid level switch 224 may be disposed in the pit 204 to selectively activate an alarm when water in the pit reaches a threshold level. In the illustrated embodiment, the liquid level switch 224 is disposed within a portion of the liquid trap housing 222 that extends below the pit cover 214. Water may flow through the liquid level switch 224 when it is admitted into the pit during a testing cycle. In various embodiments, the liquid level switch 224 may be embodied as a float switch. The liquid level switch 224 may be in communication with the valve module 202 via a cable 226, which may also house electronics for activating an alarm. In various embodiments, the electronics for activating the pump may be disposed in a separate module.
Water may be admitted to the pit 204 during a test of the pump. During such a test, the valve module 202 may be configured to open a valve and to allow a quantity of water to pass into the pit 204 through hose 210 and liquid trap housing 222. In some embodiments, the flow of water during a test may be stopped based on a signal from the liquid level switch 224. In other words, when the liquid level switch 224 is activated, the flow of water may be discontinued. In other embodiments, a specified volume of water may be discharged in connection with a test. In still other embodiments, the valve may remain open for a specified period of time.
A flow meter 242 may be configured to determine when water is flowing and/or to determine a volume of water that flows through the flow meter 242. In some embodiments, the flow meter may be configured to determine whether valve 240 has failed. For example, if the flow meter 242 detects that water is flowing when a test is not active, an alarm may be sounded and/or a message may be communicated to the user.
An outlet 250 may direct a flow of water to a funnel 246. The funnel 246 may catch a flow of water discharged from the outlet 244 after crossing an air gap 250 and direct the flow of water to hose 210. The air gap 250 may be configured to prevent liquid from the pit from flowing up the hose 210 and into the valve module. In various embodiments, the air gap may satisfy backflow prevention requirements imposed by building codes applicable in various jurisdictions.
Electronics 248 disclosed in valve module 240 may be configured to activate valve 240 to perform a test of a pump and/or to monitor the flow of water using flow sensor 242.
The liquid trap 228 may trap a quantity of liquid in area 236. Area 236 is below overflow level 260, which may include a level of two portions of the P-Trap over which the water must overflow in order to proceed from the inlet conduit 230 to the outlet conduit 216. The liquid trap 228 may include a clip 238 extending below the overflow level 260. Due to the overflow level 260 and the clip 238, the P-trap may trap water to form a liquid barrier to gases. In one embodiment, the liquid trap 228 provides a three-inch standing water column. The liquid trap 228 provides a barrier to effluent gases and other fluids from passing from the pit into the protected area through the pump testing and monitoring system.
A flow of liquid from the pump may also be directed into the pipe 308 when the pump is active. In one embodiment, the exhaust conduit 312 is in connection with a pipe 308 that may be configured to receive a flow of liquid from a pump in the pit. According to one embodiment, the exhaust conduit 312 may be provided to allow gases to pass into a gas exhaust pipe within the pipe 308. In another embodiment, the exhaust conduit 312 may be in fluid connection with pipe 308. In this particular embodiment, a one-way valve may be disposed in the exhaust conduit 312 to prevent water from flowing from pipe 308 through the exhaust conduit 312 and draining back into the pit. In one particular embodiment, another one-way valve may be disposed in pipe 308 above the junction of exhaust conduit 312 with pipe 308, the one-way valve prohibiting a flow of liquid back to the one-way valve disposed in the exhaust conduit 312 such that gasses may pass through the one-wave valve disposed in the exhaust conduit 312 without back pressure from liquid against the one-way valve in exhaust conduit 312.
A bracket 420 may maintain the position of a hose 410 over a funnel 446 to create an air gap. The air gap 450 may prevent liquid from the pit from flowing up to the hose 410. The bracket 420 may be affixed to the liquid trap housing 422. A hose clamp 432 may be used to couple the hose 410 to the bracket 420.
In the embodiment illustrated in
The liquid level switch 624 includes floats 656a, 656b that are configured to float upward when submerged in water. The buoyancy of the floats 656a, 656b may exert an upward force on a shaft 658 that is coupled to a switch 660. The switch 660 may be activated upon the exertion of a threshold force. A signal from the switch 660 may be transmitted via a cable 626. Cable 626 may pass through a seal 652 disposed in a pit cover (not shown) and may connect to a system operable to activate an alarm when the water level detected by the liquid level switch 624 exceeds a threshold level.
While specific embodiments and applications of the disclosure have been illustrated and described, the disclosure is not limited to the precise configurations and components disclosed herein. Accordingly, many changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles of this disclosure. The scope of the present invention should, therefore, be determined only by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/335,473, filed 12 May 2016, naming Eugene M. Cummings as inventor, and titled “Liquid Barrier Trap for Pump Testing Systems”; Provisional Application No. 62/292,981, filed 9 Feb. 2016, naming Eugene M. Cummings as inventor, and titled “Sump Pump Test and Monitoring System”; and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/293,316, filed 9 Feb. 2016, naming Eugene M. Cummings as inventor, and titled “Ejector Pump Test and Monitoring System”, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3687425 | Katz | Aug 1972 | A |
4186419 | Sims | Jan 1980 | A |
4222711 | Meyer | Sep 1980 | A |
4456432 | Mannino | Jun 1984 | A |
5216288 | Greene | Jun 1993 | A |
5234319 | Wilder | Aug 1993 | A |
D358560 | George | May 1995 | S |
5549456 | Burrill et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5640995 | Packard | Jun 1997 | A |
5672050 | Webber et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
D388055 | Mariotta | Dec 1997 | S |
5793294 | Schepka | Aug 1998 | A |
D399493 | Nakajima | Oct 1998 | S |
5967759 | Jurado | Oct 1999 | A |
6005483 | West | Dec 1999 | A |
D442560 | Price | May 2001 | S |
6257833 | Bates | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6322325 | Betlehradek | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6366053 | Belehradek | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6565325 | Belehradek | May 2003 | B2 |
6631097 | Su | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6676382 | Leighton et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
7015819 | Collings | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7307538 | Kochan, Jr. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7309216 | Spadola, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7373817 | Burdi et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7429842 | Schulman | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7458782 | Spadola, Jr. et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7612529 | Kochan, Jr. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
D618186 | Solow | Jun 2010 | S |
7830268 | MacDonald | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7880625 | Almoumen | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7931447 | Levin | Apr 2011 | B2 |
D642083 | Blanc | Jul 2011 | S |
8149122 | Burza | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8180496 | Scoleri et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8186975 | Kochan, Jr. | May 2012 | B2 |
D663746 | Kwon | Jul 2012 | S |
8226371 | Kochan | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8297937 | Johnson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8429967 | Kim et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8436559 | Kidd | May 2013 | B2 |
8579600 | Vijayakumar | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591198 | Kochan, Jr. et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
D710901 | Brokenshire | Aug 2014 | S |
D712735 | Kodera | Sep 2014 | S |
8907789 | Kochan | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9051830 | Stiles | Jun 2015 | B2 |
D740698 | Cummings | Oct 2015 | S |
D741815 | Cummings | Oct 2015 | S |
9404501 | Cummings | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9523366 | Cummings | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9525309 | Cummings | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9528512 | Cummings | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9528520 | Cummings | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9528522 | Cummings | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9528523 | Cummings | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9528873 | Cummings | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9534593 | Cummings | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9534606 | Cummings | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20020047783 | Bergum et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020069916 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020096050 | Miles | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102162 | Belehradek | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117214 | Tucker et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030171895 | Harris | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040011194 | Lederer | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040055363 | Bristol | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040255977 | Slocum et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060235573 | Guion | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060277980 | Kristiansen | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070078610 | Adams | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070277306 | Grooms | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080031752 | Littwin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090162211 | Kochan, Jr. et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090208345 | Moore et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100111724 | Chou | May 2010 | A1 |
20100119379 | Becker | May 2010 | A1 |
20110077875 | Tran et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110273288 | Kochan, Jr. et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110311370 | Sloss et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120199220 | Knepp | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130197700 | Kochan, Jr. et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130294931 | Magnusson | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140039836 | Moricca | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140100526 | Ueda | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140250580 | Magyar | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140368152 | Pasche | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150143891 | Cummings | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143892 | Cummings | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143893 | Cummings | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143894 | Cummings | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143895 | Cummings | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143896 | Cummings | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143897 | Cummings | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143900 | Cummings | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144818 | Cummings | May 2015 | A1 |
20150147190 | Cummings | May 2015 | A1 |
20150316936 | McCarrick | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20170058886 | Cummings | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Web Page, Protector, The Protector Control, http://www.floodnot.com/products_icontrol_battery_sump_pump.html, Copyright 1998-2012 Basement Flood Protector (2 pages). |
Web Page, NexPump, The Worlds Most Reliable Sump Pump, Ai Extreme “Rage”, https://www.nexpump.com/content/Ai_Rage.shtml, Copyrigth 2005-2012 Nexpump, Inc., (2 pages). |
Web Page, PittBoss Cellular Pump, Water, and Power Alarm, http://store.pumpalarm.com/PitBoss-Cellular-Alarm-p/s-pb/std.htm?utm_source=Google& . . . , Copyright 2014 PumpAlarm.com LLC (3 pages). |
Web Page, How Stuff Works, How Sump Pumps Work, Murray Anderson, at least as early as Jun. 10, 2011, http://home.howstuffworks.com/home-improvement/plumbing/sump-pump4.htm, (3 pages). |
Saltzman, R. What Happens When Your Sump Pump Fails? StarTribune. May 24, 2012. <URL: http://www.startribune.com/local/yourvoices/153532145.html>. |
PCT/US2014/065347 International Search Report and Written Opinion for Sump Pump Test and Monitoring System. |
PCT/US2014/065866 International Search Report and Written Opinion for Test and Monitoring System for a Dual Sump Pump Installation. |
PCT/US2014/065867 International Search Report and Written Opinion for Test and Monitoring System for a Sump Pump Installation Having a Self-Monitoring Valve Module for . . . . |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170227000 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62335473 | May 2016 | US | |
62292981 | Feb 2016 | US | |
62293316 | Feb 2016 | US |