Trapped object release system for a transit vehicle door

Abstract
Method of facilitating release of an object caught by one or more closing transit vehicle door(s) in a motorized door system having a two stage lock, the two stage lock having a fully locked position and a pushback lock position. The method includes detecting the presence of the object by the effect of the object on either the position or the velocity of the door(s). The method also includes determining whether the door(s) are in a pushback range between the fully locked position and the pushback lock position. If an object is detected and the door(s) are in the pushback range, then one or more signals are supplied to a motor of the door(s) to move the door(s) in the door opening direction to or toward the pushback lock position.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates, in general, to control systems for motorized doors and, more particularly, the present invention relates to control systems for passenger transit type vehicle doors.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Transit vehicle door systems must meet a number of conflicting requirements. They must operate quickly, to meet the pressures of urban mass transit, and they are subject to a number of safety requirements. One such requirement is that a passenger must not be able to fall out of the transit vehicle when it is in motion. Another requirement is that a passenger who has a body part, or clothing, caught by closing doors must be able to extricate the trapped body part or clothing. On a typical passenger transit train, the doors are not directly observed by the operator of the train.




It is known to provide transit vehicle doors which have resilient means disposed between the door, or doors, and a lock for the door(s) so that if a body part or garment of a passenger is caught by closing door(s), the passenger can force the door(s) open a small amount to a pushback position in order to extract the body part or garment. To do this, the passenger must overcome resilient forces, as well as the weight and friction of the door(s). With these prior art systems, the passenger may not exert enough force to open the door(s) sufficiently to extract the body part or garment. Serious injury or death may result.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In one aspect, the present invention is a method of facilitating release of an object caught by one or more closing transit vehicle door(s) in a motorized door system having a two stage lock, the two stage lock having a fully locked position and a pushback lock position. The method includes detecting the presence of the object by the effect of the object on either the position or the velocity of the door(s). The method also includes determining whether the door(s) are in a pushback range between the fully locked position and the pushback lock position. If an object is detected and the door(s) are in the pushback range, then one or more signals are supplied to a motor of the door(s) to move the door(s) in the door opening direction to or toward the pushback lock position.




In another aspect, the present invention is an apparatus for facilitating release of an object caught by one or more closing transit vehicle door(s) in a motorized door system having a two stage lock, the two stage lock having a fully locked position and a pushback lock position. The apparatus includes means disposed in a control system of the motorized door for detecting the object by the effect of the object on either the position of the door(s) or the velocity of the door(s). It also includes means for determining whether the door(s) are in a pushback range between the fully locked position and the pushback lock position. It further includes means for supplying one or more signals to the motor of the door system to move the door(s) in the door opening direction to or toward the pushback lock position, if the door(s) are in the pushback range and the object is detected.




OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION




It is therefore one of the primary objects of the present invention to provide a transit vehicle door system which operates quickly.




Another object of the present invention is to provide a trapped object release system for a transit vehicle door.




Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method of releasing a passenger's body part or garment portion which has been caught by closing transit vehicle doors.




Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a method of reducing the force needed to move transit vehicle door(s) from the closed position to a pushback position.




An additional object of the present invention is to eliminate the need for a passenger to overcome resilient forces to open a closed door sufficiently to extract a garment or trapped body portion.




A further object of the present invention is to provide a powered assist for moving transit vehicle door(s) from the closed position to a position which is sufficiently open that a person may extract a garment or trapped body portion.




It is an additional object of the present invention to provide a powered assist for moving transit vehicle door(s) from a closed position to a pushback position.




Yet another object of the present invention is to allow a controlled distance, upon pushback re-open, only large enough that the head of a child cannot pass through the resulting opening.




In addition to the various objects and advantages of the present invention which have been generally described above, there will be various other objects and advantages of the invention that will become more readily apparent to those persons who are skilled in the relevant art from the following more detailed description of the invention, particularly, when the detailed description is taken in conjunction with the attached drawing figures and with the appended claims.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic illustration of a presently preferred embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 2

is a schematic elevation drawing of a transit vehicle with biparting, door panels in an open position.





FIG. 3

is a schematic elevation drawing of the transit vehicle with biparting door panels in a closed position.





FIG. 4

is a schematic elevation drawing of the transit vehicle with biparting door panels in a pushback position.





FIG. 5

is a plot showing profiles of door velocity and position during a stroke of the door(s).





FIG. 6

is a plot showing portions of the velocity profile when the door has reached the pushback range.





FIG. 7

is a plot showing upper and lower position limits for the door panels after the conclusion of a closing stroke.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENTLY PREFERRED AND VARIOUS ALTERNATIVE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION




Prior to proceeding to the much more detailed description of the present invention, it should be noted that identical components which have identical functions have been identified with identical reference numerals throughout the several views illustrated in the drawing figures for the sake of clarity and understanding of the invention.




Attention is now directed to

FIG. 1

which illustrates an apparatus, generally designated


10


, that controls the motorized door (not shown). Apparatus


10


includes a central processor


12


having a signal connection


14


to a motion control processor


16


. Such central processor


12


may include, for example, a commercially available microprocessor of the type normally employed in personal computers such as the 8088, x386, x486, etc, or a micro-computer such as 68HC11, 8051, etc. Signal connection


14


may include a data bus, an address bus and one or more control lines. Motion control processor


16


, preferably, is an LM629, which is employed in the robotics art for movement of objects having significant mass. Alternatively, there are other types of commercially available processors that may be used. Examples of these processors include fast microprocessors, RISC processors, Digital Signal Processors (DSP), etc.




Motion control processor


16


has a signal connection


18


to motor driver circuits


20


which have a connection


22


to motor


24


. A person skilled in the art will recognize that these motor driver circuits


20


may, for example, include an H-bridge or any other type of motor power amplifier. Motor


24


has an output power rotor


26


and a rotary position encoder


28


which determines the rotary position of output power rotor


26


and, hence, defines the position of the door. Signals from encoder


28


are communicated to motion control processor


16


by signal connection


30


.




Attention is now directed to

FIGS. 2

,


3


and


4


which show a biparting door system. A transit vehicle


40


has a door aperture


42


and biparting door panels


44


and


46


.

FIG. 2

shows the door panels


44


and


46


in an open position.

FIG. 3

illustrates these door panels


44


and


46


in a closed position in which they cover such aperture


42


.

FIG. 4

shows the door panels


44


and


46


in a pushback lock position in which a gap


48


is provided between door panels


44


and


46


to enable extraction of an object trapped by door panels


44


and


46


when the panels are closed. Gap


48


is sufficiently small that a person cannot fall out of a transit vehicle


40


through gap


48


.




The pushback lock is a mechanical lock which engages during a closing stroke when the door panels


44


and


46


reach the pushback lock position. The pushback lock provides a positive limit to the size of gap


48


. The presently preferred pushback lock is a portion of a two stage lock which has both a fully locked position and a pushback lock position. It employs a lock arm having a pushback lock step, as well as a step for the fully locked position. When the lock arm rotates downward, the pushback lock step or the step for the fully locked position will engage a door hanger of door panel


44


or


46


. Details of the preferred pushback lock are presented in the copending patent application: TRANSIT VEHICLE DOOR, Ser. No. 09/099,260, filed on Jun. 18, 1998. Preferably, two lock arms are provided, engaging the respective hangers of the door panels


44


and


46


.





FIG. 5

is a plot illustrating the profiles of position and velocity during a closing stroke of the door(s). The time axis is denoted


70


and the velocity axis for velocity profile, generally denoted


50


, is denoted


80


. A profile for distance travelled by the doors is generally denoted


65


. The position axis for such distance profile


65


is denoted


64


. The zero for both the velocity axis


80


and the distance axis


64


is denoted


54


.




For the case of two biparting door panels, it is preferred that they be mechanically connected so that they move simultaneously in opposite directions. The distance axis in

FIG. 5

may be considered to represent the position of one of the two doors, or it may be considered to represent the angle through which output power rotor


26


has been rotated.




The closing stroke begins at a time


72


and ends at a time


74


. During that time, the position


64


goes from the zero position


54


, which is the fully open position shown in

FIG. 2

, to the closed position


60


which is shown in FIG.


3


.




The pushback lock position is denoted


61


. Biparting door panels


44


and


46


in this position are illustrated in FIG.


4


. The gap


48


is provided between door panels


44


and


46


when the door panels


44


and


46


are in the pushback lock position.




The position profile


65


reaches the pushback lock position


61


at the point


62


, which occurs at the time


76


. Segment


51


of velocity profile


50


denotes a portion of the door closing cycle subsequent to time


76


while door panels


44


and


46


are still in motion. Segment


52


of velocity profile


50


denotes a time when such door panels


44


and


46


have stopped.




The present invention applies to segments


51


and


52


of velocity profile


50


. When door panels


44


and


46


are in a pushback range, which lies between position


61


and position


62


, and an obstruction is detected, the door panels


44


and


46


are moved to the pushback lock position


61


so that gap


48


is provided to facilitate extraction of a trapped portion of a person or garment.




When the closing door panels


44


and


46


reach point


62


, the pushback lock (not shown) is engaged and door panels


44


and


46


cannot be moved to positions


64


or more open than the pushback lock position


61


. This is to prevent a person from falling out of transit vehicle


40


after the door panels


44


and


46


are closed to the pushback lock position


61


.





FIG. 6

shows allowable limits for segments


51


and


52


of velocity profile


50


. In segment


51


, the door panels have reached the pushback lock position


61


, but the panels are not yet stopped. In segment


52


, the panels have been stopped. An upper limit


90


and a lower limit


92


for the velocity of door panels


44


and


46


on segment


51


are shown. If the actual velocity goes above upper limit


90


or below lower limit


92


, a brake is activated to stop door panels


44


and


46


and then panels


44


and


46


are moved to the pushback lock position


61


which provides the gap


48


to facilitate removal of a portion of a person or garment. Preferably, the brake is a dynamic brake as described in the application: DYNAMIC BRAKE FOR POWER DOOR, Ser. No. 09/200,497 which was referenced above.




After the closing stroke has ended at time


74


, segment


52


denotes the stopped portion of profile


50


. If an obstruction causes the door panels


44


and


46


to move above the upper velocity limit


94


or below the lower velocity limit


96


, then the doors are moved to pushback lock position


61


, which provides such gap


48


to facilitate removal of a portion of the person or garment.




In the presently preferred embodiment, an obstruction after the doors are stopped is detected by a change in position of the door panels


44


and


46


.

FIG. 7

shows portions


66


and


67


of distance profile


65


. Segment


66


begins at point


62


when the door panels


44


and


46


reach pusliback lock position


61


. In segment


66


, the door panels


44


and


46


are still moving. Segment


66


corresponds to velocity segment


51


shown in FIG.


6


. After the door panels


44


and


46


are completely stopped, at time


74


, the position


65


of panels


44


and


46


remains constant. This segment is denoted


67


. This segment applies to the door panels


44


and


46


after they are stopped and before they are completely locked.




If, when the door panels


44


and


46


are on segment


67


, even if a very slight movement of panels


44


and


46


occurs, that event is taken to be an indication that an obstruction has been encountered. That is to say, that a portion of a person, a garment, etc., has been caught between the closing door panels


44


and


46


.

FIG. 7

shows an upper position limit


98


and a lower position limit


99


. If the position of panels


44


and


46


reaches either limit, then at least one signal is sent to motor


24


to move door panels


44


and


46


to the pushback position


61


. Since door panels


44


and


46


have been stopped, any further movement is an indication that an obstruction has been detected, it is preferred that upper and lower position limits


98


and


99


correspond to only a very few pulses of position encoder


28


.




Preferably, this is accomplished by defining a stroke in the central processor


12


which moves door panels


44


and


46


to pushback position


61


. This stroke is then communicated to motion control processor


16


which controls the movement of door panels


44


and


46


to pushback position


61


.




In the preceding discussion, a door system having biparting panels


44


and


46


has been discussed. In an alternative embodiment, the invention may be applied to a single door system.




While a presently preferred and various additional alternative embodiments of the instant invention have been described in detail above in accordance with the patent statutes, it should be recognized that various other modifications and adaptations of the invention may be made by those persons who are skilled in the relevant art without departing from either the spirit of the invention or the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of facilitating release of an object caught by at least one closing transit vehicle door in a motorized door system having a two stage lock, said two stage lock having a fully locked position and a pushback lock position, said method comprising the steps of:(a) detecting a presence of said object by an effect of said object on at least one of a position of said at least one door and a velocity of said at least one door; (b) determining whether said at least one door is in a pushback range between said fully locked position and said pushback lock position; and (c) supplying at least one signal to a motor of said at least one door, said at least one signal defining a stroke in a door opening direction of said at least one door to move said at least one door to a position one of at and near said pushback lock position, if said at least one door is in said pushback range and said object is detected.
  • 2. A method, according to claim 1, further comprising the step of applying a brake of said door to stop said at least one door if said at least one door is moving in a closing direction when said object is detected.
  • 3. A method, according to claim 2, wherein said at least one signal defines said stroke in said opening direction of said at least one door from a position of said at least one door after said brake has stopped said at least one door to said position one of at and near said pushback position.
  • 4. A method, according to claim 1, wherein step (a) is further characterized in that said effect of said object on said position of said at least one door is determined by a position encoder for said motor of said at least one door.
  • 5. A method, according to claim 1, wherein a door trajectory profile for said stroke is generated in a central processor of said motorized door system and communicated to a motion control processor which provides feedback control of said stroke.
  • 6. A method, according to claim 1, further comprising determining whether a closing stroke has been completed and in that case setting upper and lower position limits for said at least one door and supplying said signal if a position of said at least one door moves beyond one of said upper and lower position limits.
  • 7. A method, according to claim 6, wherein said upper and lower position limits correspond to only a very few pulses of a position encoder for said at least one door.
  • 8. An apparatus for facilitating release of an object caught by at least one closing transit vehicle door in a motorized door system having a two stage lock, such two stage lock having a fully locked position and a pushback lock position, said apparatus comprising:(a) means disposed in a control system of such motorized door for detecting a presence of such object by an effect of such object on at least one of a position of such at least one door and a velocity of such at least one door; (b) means disposed in such control system for determining whether such at least one door is in a pushback range between such fully locked position and such pushback lock position; and (c) means disposed in such control system for supplying at least one signal to a motor of such at least one door, said at least one signal defining a stroke in a door opening direction of such at least one door to move such at least one door to a position one of at and near such pushback lock position, if such at least one door is in such pushback range and such object is detected.
  • 9. An apparatus, according to claim 8, further comprising means for applying a brake of such at least one door to stop such at least one door if such at least one door is moving in a closing direction when such object is detected.
  • 10. An apparatus, according to claim 8, wherein said apparatus is further characterized in that said at least one signal defines said stroke in such opening direction of such at least one door from a position of such at least one door when such object is detected to such position one of at and near such pushback lock position.
  • 11. An apparatus, according to claim 8, further characterized in that a position of such door(s) is indicated by a position encoder for such motor of such door(s), such position encoder being connected to such control system.
  • 12. An apparatus, according to claim 10, wherein said apparatus is further characterized in that a door trajectory profile for said stroke is generated in a central processor of such motorized door system and communicated to a motion control processor which provides feedback control of said stroke.
  • 13. An apparatus, according to claim 8, further comprising means disposed in said control system for determining whether a closing stroke has been completed, and if such closing stroke has been completed, setting upper and lower position limits for such at least one door and supplying said signal if a position of such at least one door moves beyond one of said upper and lower position limits.
  • 14. An apparatus, according to claim 13, wherein said apparatus is further characterized in that said upper and lower position limits correspond to only a very few pulses of a position encoder for such at least one door.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The invention described in this patent application is closely related to the following copending patent applications: TRANSIT VEHICLE DOOR, Ser. No. 09/099,260 filed Jun. 18, 1998now U.S. Pat. No. 6,032,416; provisional application: INTELLIGENT DOOR CONTROL UNIT, Serial # 60/109,951, filed Nov. 25, 1998; DYNAMIC BRAKE FOR POWER DOOR, Ser. No. 09/200,497, filed Nov. 25, 1998now U.S. Pat. No. 6,175,204; ENCODER TEST APPARATUS AND METHOD, Ser. No. 09/401,767 filed Sept. 23, 1999now U.S. Pat. No. 6,198,788; and to applications: SYSTEM FOR DETECTIONS OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN A MOTORIZED DOOR SYSTEM Ser. No. 09/448,999 and DOOR CONTROL SYSTEM, Ser. No. 09/448,782, which latter two applications are being filed concurrently herewith. The teachings of these referenced applications are herein incorporated into the present application by reference thereto. All of the referenced applications are assigned to the assignee of the present invention.

US Referenced Citations (2)
Number Name Date Kind
5076016 Adams et al. Dec 1991
6032416 Springer et al. Mar 2000
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/109951 Nov 1998 US