This invention relates generally to rotating machinery and more particularly to apparatus for balancing rotors.
Gas turbine engines typically include several rotor stages, each having a rotor disk carrying an array of airfoils, i.e., compressor or turbine blades. Turbine rotors must be balanced to prevent damage and excessive loads on bearings and supporting structures, as well as efficiency losses caused by loss of clearance between the airfoils and the surrounding structure (caused by, e.g., shroud rubs).
Despite efforts to first balance their constituent components, turbine rotors still require dynamic balancing following assembly. For this purpose, it is desirable to use balance weights that can be re-positioned to redistribute the mass of the rotor as needed and allow the system unbalance to be fine-tuned to meet precise requirements. Separable balance weights are a common practice in larger gas turbine engines. These include bolts, washers, nuts and other fasteners of varying sizes.
In some gas turbine rotors, notably those in smaller engines, CURVIC couplings and friction joints are assembled using a single bolt or a group of bolts (referred to as a “tie rod” or “tie bolts”) spanning the length of the assembly. A tie bolt configuration weighs less than a conventional bolted joint, but the absence of bolt holes eliminates convenient features on the rotor disk which could otherwise be used to attach separable balance weights. Accordingly, the current state of the art for smaller turbine engines is to balance the assembly by selectively machining a sacrificial surface on the rotating part. Material is removed at the location of peak unbalance to redistribute the mass of the rotor about the axis of rotation. This process is irreversible and risks damaging a component such as an integrally-bladed rotor or “blisk”, which is both safety-critical and expensive.
These and other shortcomings of the prior art are addressed by the present invention, which provides a trapped spring balance weight for a turbine rotor.
According to one aspect of the invention, a balance weight for a turbine rotor includes: a block-like centerbody pair of resilient spring arms extending laterally from opposite sides of the centerbody, the centerbody and the spring arms collectively defining an arcuate shape; at least one locating structure extending from a radially outer surface of the balance weight; and a limit tab extending radially inward from a distal end of each of the spring arms.
According to another aspect of the invention a turbine rotor assembly includes: a rotor element including an annular hub surface and an annular flange surrounding the hub surface, spaced away from the hub surface so as to define a pocket; and at least one balance weight disposed in the pocket, including: a block-like centerbody; a pair of resilient spring arms extending laterally from opposite sides of the centerbody, the centerbody and the spring arms collectively defining an arcuate shape; at least one locating feature extending radially outward from the balance weight; and a limit tab extending radially inward from a distal end of each of the spring arms; wherein the spring arms and the centerbody resiliently bear against the flange and the hub surface, respectively, so as to retain the balance weight in the pocket. A radial height of the limit tabs is selected so as to prevent insertion of the balance weight into the pocket if the spring arms are deflected beyond a predetermined limit.
The invention may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which:
Referring to the drawings wherein identical reference numerals denote the same elements throughout the various views,
In the illustrated example, the engine is a turboshaft engine, and the inner shaft 22 would be coupled to an external load such as a reduction gearbox or propeller. However, the principles described herein are equally applicable to turboprop, turbojet, and turbofan engines, as well as turbine engines used for other vehicles or in stationary applications. These principles are also applicable to any other type of rotating machinery (e.g. wheels, gears, shafts, etc.) which require balancing.
In the illustrated example, the compressor 12 includes five axial-flow rotor stages and one mixed-flow stage which is positioned immediately upstream of the combustor 14. As best seen in
As seen in
One or more forward balance weights 60 are installed in the pocket 34 of the first stage rotor 24, and one or more aft balance weights 160 are installed in the pocket 50 of the impeller shaft 20. The exact number, position, and distribution of weights will vary by individual engine. In the particular engine illustrated, only two balance weights are used. Correction of rotor imbalance is accomplished by re-positioning the weights as needed.
With reference to
If necessary as indicated by a balancing operation, the forward balance weights 60 can be repositioned circumferentially while the compressor 12 is assembled, for example through use of a spanner-wrench tool. For example,
As seen in
While the balance weights 60 and 160 have described as “forward” and “aft” weights, it will be understood that these terms are used merely for convenience in description of a particular embodiment. Depending upon the specific engine application and the mating hardware, either design could be used on the forward or aft face of a turbine rotor disk or shaft. Furthermore, the anti-rotation and axial restraint features could be modified or used in different combinations to produce a balance weight suitable for a particular application.
One or more balance weights 260 are installed in the pocket 234 of the first stage rotor 224. The exact number, position, and distribution of weights will vary by individual engine. Correction of rotor imbalance is accomplished by re-positioning the weights as needed.
With reference to
The balance weight design described herein has several advantages over the current state-of-the-art for small engines. Process control is improved compared to material removal directly from the first stage rotor 24, which introduces local stress concentrations on highly stressed critical rotating parts. Any stress concentration features present on the balance weights 60, 160, or 260 would be generated using precision machining techniques and are therefore more well controlled. Engine cleanliness is also enhanced, as the balance weights do not require any machining at engine assembly and therefore do not create dust or grit that could contaminate the engine system. Finally, cycle time for the balancing process is reduced, because the balance weights can be easily re-positioned while the rotor is loaded in a balance machine, eliminating the re-work loop associated with a material removal balancing process.
The foregoing has described balance weights for a turbine rotor and a balanced rotor assembly. While specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications thereto can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention and the best mode for practicing the invention are provided for the purpose of illustration only and not for the purpose of limitation, the invention being defined by the claims.
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of application Ser. No. 12/485,122 filed Jun. 16, 2009, which is currently pending.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3273419 | Kollmann | Sep 1966 | A |
3304053 | Pagluica | Feb 1967 | A |
3965382 | McCrosky et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4101245 | Hess et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4294135 | Tameo | Oct 1981 | A |
4567649 | Ades et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4570053 | Ades et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4590653 | Ades et al. | May 1986 | A |
4635336 | Ades et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4784012 | Marra | Nov 1988 | A |
4817455 | Buxe | Apr 1989 | A |
4835827 | Marra | Jun 1989 | A |
4848182 | Novotny | Jul 1989 | A |
5018943 | Corsmeier et al. | May 1991 | A |
5205189 | Wesling et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5280736 | Wesling et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5582077 | Agram et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5733103 | Wallace et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6279420 | Knorowski et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6477916 | Knorowski et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6481969 | Berry et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
7108480 | Zatorski et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7234916 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7347672 | Bertrand et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7371042 | Lee | May 2008 | B2 |
7377749 | Charrier et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7465146 | Kennedy et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7780419 | Matheny et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
8348616 | Williams et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20030213334 | Czerniak et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050265846 | Przytulski et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20090133494 | Van Dam et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100080689 | Lee et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100316496 | Williams | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1416040 | Oct 1965 | FR |
2005351271 | Dec 2005 | JP |
4285341 | Jun 2009 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/036328, dated Jun. 19, 2013. |
PCT Search Report Issued Jun. 6, 2011 in Application PCT/US2010/028403. |
Unofficial English translation of Notice of Allowance issued in connection with corresponding JP Application No. 2012-516078 on Aug. 5, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/485,122, filed Jun. 16, 2009, Aaron Todd Williams et al. |
Unofficial translation of JP Office Action issued on Nov. 4, 2015 in relation to corresponding JP Application 2015-504777. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120207603 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12485122 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 13452154 | US |