Premixed Dry Low NOx (DLN) combustion systems for heavy-duty gas turbines for both annular and can-annular designs are based on fuel staging, air staging, or a combination of the two. This enables operation across a relatively wide range of conditions. The window for premixed combustion is relatively narrow when compared to the duty cycle of a modern gas turbine. Thus, conditions within the combustion system are typically “staged” to create local zones of stable combustion despite the fact that bulk conditions may place the design outside its operational limits (i.e., emissions, flammability, etc.).
Additionally, staging affords an opportunity to “tune” the combustion system away from potentially damaging acoustic instabilities. Premixed systems may experience combustion “dynamics”. The ability to change the flame shape, provide damping, or stagger the convective time of the fuel to the flame front have all been employed as a means to attempt to control the onset of these events. However, these features tend to be either non-adjustable or can only be exercised at the expense of another fundamental boundary such as emissions.
Dynamics mitigation is a source of continuous investigation. Most combustor designs have a means of staging the fuel flow (commonly referred to as a “fuel split”) but this creates an emissions penalty. Other designs have multiple fuel injection planes to create a mixture of convective times. Again, here numerous approaches are possible, such as fuel forcing, resonators, quarter wave tubes, etc.
Acoustic instabilities are an indication of a coincidence of heat release fluctuations with one or more of the inherent acoustic modes of the combustion chamber. The manner in which these heat release fluctuations interact with the chamber is dictated to a large extent by the shape of the flame and the transport time of the fuel/air mixture to the flame front. Both parameters are commonly manipulated by changing the distribution of the fuel to the various nozzles within the combustor. If the nozzles are in a common axial plane, then the main effect is to change the flame shape. If instead the nozzles are in distinct axial locations, then the main effect is to change the convective times. Additionally, nozzles in a common plane may result in detrimental nozzle-to-nozzle flame front interactions unless one nozzle is “biased” to prevail from a stability standpoint over the adjacent nozzles. However, either adjustment leads to a reduction in operability. That is, non-uniform fuel distribution in a common plane leads to relatively higher NOx emissions through the well-established exponential dependency of NOx formation on local flame temperature. Also, non-uniform fuel distribution in distinct axial locations can create a potential flame holding location if one nozzle group is upstream of the other (e.g., the “quat” system).
According to one aspect of the invention, a combustor includes a fuel nozzle assembly that has a center body, an inner shroud that surrounds at least a portion of the center body, an outer shroud that surrounds at least a portion of the inner shroud, and a plurality of cooling holes formed in a portion of the outer shroud, cooling air being introduced in a space between the inner and outer shrouds and exiting from the plurality of cooling holes. The combustor also includes an actuator that moves at least the center body in an axial direction.
According to another aspect of the invention, a combustor includes at least one fuel nozzle assembly having a center body, a shroud that surrounds at least a portion of the center body, and a vane disposed between the center body and the shroud. The combustor also includes an actuator that moves at least the center body in an axial direction.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a combustor includes a central fuel nozzle assembly and a plurality of outer fuel nozzle assemblies, each of the plurality of outer fuel nozzle assemblies having a center body and an outer shroud, the plurality of outer fuel nozzle assemblies being configured to abut one another in a surrounding relationship to the central cylinder such that no gaps are present between any two abutting ones of the plurality of outer fuel nozzle assemblies.
These and other advantages and features will become more apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the drawings.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The detailed description explains embodiments of the invention, together with advantages and features, by way of example with reference to the drawings.
Referring to
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the entire fuel nozzle assembly 104 may be moved or traversed axially. In accordance with another embodiment, only the center body 124 of the fuel nozzle assembly 104 may be moved axially. In addition, only one of the fuel nozzle assemblies 104 may be moved axially at any one time, or some combination of two or more of the fuel nozzle assemblies 104 may be moved axially at any one time. Movement of a portion or all of one or more of the fuel nozzle assemblies 104 is typically carried out to tune the performance of the combustor 100 as desired. Regardless of the type of movement of the fuel nozzle assemblies 104, such movement is achieved by one or more of the actuator mechanisms 148. The actuator mechanism 148 may comprise any type of suitable actuator, such as electric, hydraulic, pneumatic, etc., that is controlled by a controller (not shown). The output of the actuator mechanism 148 connects by suitable mechanical linkages to the center body 124 of the corresponding fuel nozzle assembly 104. The actuator mechanism 148 is operable to move only the center body 124 or, where desired, may move the fuel nozzle assembly 104 that includes not only the center body 124 but also the vane 116 and the inner and outer shrouds 120, 144. Such movement is in an axial direction (i.e., back and forth in
This type of movement sets the depth of emersion of the center body 124 into a combustion “hot zone”, which is that portion of the combustor 100 to the right of the bulkhead/cap assembly 136 as viewed in
This type of cooling of the inner shroud 120 may be achieved by forming a number of cooling holes 156 in the outer shroud 144 and forcing relatively cooler air in the space between the inner and outer shrouds 120, 144 from the left side in
In the fuel nozzle assemblies 104 illustrated in
The center fuel nozzle assembly 304 may be completely surrounded by a plurality (e.g., six) of the outer fuel nozzle assemblies 308. Each outer fuel nozzle assembly 308 may have a center body 310 and a trapezoidal shaped double walled cooled shroud 312. However, a trapezoidal shape for the shrouds 312 is purely exemplary; other shapes may be used so long as when the outer fuel nozzle assemblies 308 are placed near or adjacent one another there are no gaps between such assemblies 308 and no cap is needed to cover any gaps between such assemblies 308. The back end 314 of each outer fuel nozzle assembly 308 may have a circular shaped vane or swirler. Also, a compliant seal 316 may be provided at each junction between adjacent outer fuel nozzle assemblies 308, or between the center fuel nozzle assembly 304 and any one or more of the outer fuel nozzle assemblies 308, to eliminate any gaps therebetween. In this embodiment, the center body 310 and the vane 314 of the outer fuel nozzle assemblies 308, along with the center body 306 and vane 314 of the center fuel nozzle assembly, are moved in an axial back and forth direction. The plurality of fuel nozzle assemblies 304, 308 may be moved in an axial direction by the actuator mechanism 148 of
Referring to
Embodiments of the invention provide for an adjustable feature to target flame shape and convective times by allowing for the axial displacement of certain one or more of the fuel nozzle assemblies within the combustion chamber. By allowing for one or more fuel nozzle assemblies to traverse axially within the combustion chamber, both flame shape and convective time are affected without impacting NOx emissions or operability. More specifically, axial displacement of the nozzles changes the flame shape and the convective times to the flame front, thus affecting two of the most fundamental dynamics drivers in the combustor of a gas turbine. Also, the axial displacement of the nozzles can be leveraged to achieve improved (greater) turndown by delaying the quenching effect that under-fueled neighboring nozzles have on the “anchor” nozzles (i.e., preventing premature quenching of the anchor nozzles).
In addition, embodiments of the invention eliminate the need for a combustion “cap”, which is a relatively thin cooled plate that fills in the space between the nozzles 104, thus isolating the zone of heat release from the upstream components. Instead, embodiments of the invention shape the nozzles to completely fill in the inter-nozzle gaps, resulting in “closely packed nozzles”. The elimination of the combustion cap (i.e., a “cap-less combustor assembly”) removes a recurring reliability issue for the thin cooled plate.
Further, each fuel nozzle assembly 104 has a burner tube or shroud that is cooled to allow the nozzle to protrude into the combustion “hot zone” of the combustion chamber. Cooling the nozzle burner tubes to allow the tubes to protrude into the “hot zone” is synergistic with the flame holding tolerant concepts (i.e. nozzles that can withstand flame holding long enough to detect and correct the event). Thus, cooling of nozzle burner tubes fits into the growing demand for fuel flexible designs.
Therefore, embodiments of the invention provide for a dynamics “knob” that does not impact emissions or flame holding and is synergistic with fuel flexibility improvements as well as increased turndown effects.
While the invention has been described in detail in connection with only a limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/352,674 filed on Jan. 13, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1679830 | Lang | Aug 1928 | A |
1786946 | Hofmann | Dec 1930 | A |
2655787 | Brown | Oct 1953 | A |
3095153 | Soth | Jun 1963 | A |
3728859 | Seiler | Apr 1973 | A |
3741166 | Bailey | Jun 1973 | A |
3788797 | Mayfield et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3974646 | Markowski et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4078377 | Owens et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
H19 | Carlson | Feb 1986 | H |
5125227 | Ford et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5257499 | Leonard | Nov 1993 | A |
5319923 | Leonard et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323604 | Ekstedt et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5343693 | Komatsu et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5373693 | Zarzalis et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5664412 | Overton | Sep 1997 | A |
6026645 | Stokes et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038861 | Amos et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6082111 | Stokes | Jul 2000 | A |
6101814 | Hoke et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122916 | Amos et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6199367 | Howell | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6272842 | Dean | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282886 | Sato et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6427446 | Kraft et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453660 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6701713 | Mandai et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6742338 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6772594 | Nishida et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6915637 | Nishida et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6968692 | Chin et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7360363 | Mandai et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370466 | Cai | May 2008 | B2 |
7581402 | Parker | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7891191 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8069671 | Hellat et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8113000 | Laster et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20050211142 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070125085 | Commaret et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080289341 | Ishizaka et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100101229 | York et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1673620 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1225392 | Jul 2002 | EP |
0518537 | Jan 1993 | JP |
0579629 | Mar 1993 | JP |
07318059 | Dec 1995 | JP |
08178287 | Jul 1996 | JP |
2000146183 | May 2000 | JP |
2004226051 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2006336995 | Dec 2006 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with corresponding JP Application No. 2010-002463 on Oct. 15, 2013. |
Search Report from CN Application No. 201010005233.2 dated May 26, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120198851 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12352674 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 13449904 | US |