Tray for producing particulate food products

Abstract
A tray assembly for use in feeding liquid composition to a freezing chamber is disclosed. The tray has a plurality of projections that are designed to provide regulated discharge of the liquid composition from the tray and to feed the liquid composition into the freezing chamber in uniformly sized drops. The projections area each downwardly disposed in relation to the tray. The tray has a bottom wall with a plurality of orifices, where each orifice is associated with a corresponding projection. These projections are uniform in size and can be formed using computerized welding techniques. An alternate embodiment in which the tray is pressurized is also disclosed.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to a tray used in manufacturing particulate ice cream.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Manufacturing particulate food products, such as beads of ice cream has become an increasingly profitable business. However, there can be a wide range in the sizes of frozen ice cream beads. Unfortunately, liquid particles or specks are sometimes released from the trays, which results in the formation of frozen fragments. The fragments are not only undesirable in appearance, but also adversely affect the collection of usable product. Thus, the formation of fragments introduces inefficiency into the process of preparing the frozen beaded ice cream products.


Accordingly, it is desired to eliminate the formation of frozen particulate fragments during product manufacture. Using advanced specialized welding, a structural modification can be made to a feed tray to make the feed tray more easily cleanable, more durable, yet still conform with USDA 3A sanitary requirements.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention has as its primary objective a dropper assembly for feeding liquid composition to a freezing chamber which includes a tray overlying a freezing chamber. That tray is disposed to receive liquid composition from a delivery source and has a bottom wall with a plurality of orifices through which the received liquid composition is directed, as well as a plurality of projections extending perpendicular from a lower surface of the tray and for regulating discharge of the liquid composition from the tray and for feeding said liquid composition to said freezing chamber in uniformly sized droplets.


It is a further object of the present invention is to provide each of the plurality of projections being aligned in fluid communication with one of the plurality of orifices in the bottom wall of the tray, where the projections are affixed to the tray using a precision welding process. A further object of the present invention is to provide a method of operating the dropper assembly described above.


These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become readily apparent as the following description is read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a cryogenic processor of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a tray within the cryogenic processor of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is close-up view of the tray of FIG. 2;



FIG. 4 shows a computer screen from a software program used in welding the tray of FIGS. 1-3; and



FIG. 5 shows an alternative embodiment of the present invention





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Having summarized various aspects of the present invention, reference will now be made in detail to the description of the invention as illustrated in the drawings. While the invention will be described in connection with these drawings, there is no intent to limit it to the embodiment or embodiments disclosed therein. On the contrary, the intent is to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.



FIG. 1 shows a cryogenic processor constructed in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention to produce free-flowing frozen food products in the form of small beads. The fundamental method utilized to produce the product is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,126,156.


The cryogenic processor 10 includes a freezing chamber 12 that is most preferably in the form of a conical tank that holds a liquid refrigerant therein. The freezing chamber 12 incorporates an inner shell 14 and an outer shell 16. Insulation 18 is disposed between the inner shell 14 and outer shell 16 in order to increase the thermal efficiency of the chamber 12. Vents 20 are provided to ventilate the insulated area formed between the shells 14 and 16. The freezing chamber 12 is a free-standing unit supported by legs 22. Alternatively, the freezing chamber 12 may be disposed in a frame that is specially built to support the processor while in use.


A refrigerant 24, preferably liquid nitrogen in view of its known freezing capabilities, enters the freezing chamber 12 by means of refrigerant inlet 26. The refrigerant 24 entering chamber 12 through inlet 26 is used to maintain a predetermined level of liquid refrigerant in the freezing chamber and must be added to replace refrigerant 24 that is lost by evaporation or by other means incidental to production. Any gaseous refrigerant that has evaporated from the surface of the liquid refrigerant 24 in freezing chamber 12 primarily vents to the atmosphere through exit port 29 which cooperates with the vacuum assembly 30, which can be in the form of a venturi nozzle. Extraction of the frozen beads occurs through the product outlet 32 adapted at the base of the freezing chamber 12.


An ambient air inlet port 28 with adjustment doors 38 and exit port 29 with adjustment doors 39 are provided to adjust the level of gaseous refrigerant which evaporates from the surface of the liquid refrigerant 24 so that excessive pressure is not built up within the processor 10 and freezing of the liquid composition in the feed assembly 40 does not occur.


As shown in FIG. 1, a feed tray 48 receives liquid composition 62 from a delivery source 50. Typically, a pump drives the liquid composition 62 through a delivery tube 52 into the feed tray 48. A premixing device 54 allows several compositions, not all of which must be liquid, such as powdered flavorings or other additives of a size small enough not to cause clogging in the feed assembly 40, to be mixed in predetermined concentrations for delivery to the feed tray 48.


In order to create uniformly sized beads 56 of frozen food products, uniformly sized droplets 58 of liquid composition are required to be fed through gas diffusion chamber 46 to freezing chamber 12. The feed tray 48 works with the feed assembly 40 to form droplets 58 of the desired character. When the droplets 58 of liquid composition contact the refrigerant vapor in the gas diffusion chamber 46, beads 56 that are formed which fall to the bottom of chamber 12. A transport system connects to the bottom of chamber 12 at outlet 32 to carry the beads 56 to a packaging and distribution network for later delivery and consumption.


A vacuum assembly 30 cooperates with air inlet 28 and adjustment doors 38 so that an ambient air flow passes through the inlet and around feed assembly 40 to ensure that no liquid composition freezes therein. This is accomplished by mounting the vacuum assembly 30 and air inlet 28 on opposing sides of the gas diffusion chamber 46 such that the incoming ambient air drawn by the vacuum assembly 30 is aligned with the feed assembly. In this configuration, ambient air flows around the feed assembly warming it to a sufficient temperature to inhibit the formation of frozen liquid composition in the feed assembly flow channels. Air source 60, typically in the form of an air compressor, is attached to vacuum assembly 30 to provide appropriate suction to create the ambient air flow required.



FIG. 1 also shows a substantially rectangular tray 48 positioned above the freezing chamber 12 and extending completely across the top of the freezing chamber 12 along its minor dimension. However, the assembly 10 can have a very large tray 48 constructed to cover the entirety of the freezing chamber 12 or, alternatively, smaller trays 48 may be manufactured and placed side by side. In either case, in order to create uniformly sized beads 56 of frozen product, uniformly sized droplets 58 of liquid composition 62 are required to be fed to the freezing chamber 12. Accordingly, the tray 48 is designed to form droplets 58 of the desired character.


As shown in FIG. 2, the tray 48 preferably has a bottom surface and side walls which form an enclosure for receiving the liquid composition 62 from a source 34. Typically, a pump drives the liquid composition 62 through a delivery tube 52 into the tray 48. The liquid composition 62 is then fed to the freezing chamber 12 as is more fully discussed below.


As shown in FIG. 2, the bottom wall of the tray 48 is formed with a plurality of orifices which connect to projections 44. Preferably, the orifices are in an ordered array of rows and columns, although the present invention should not be considered as limited exclusively thereto. The liquid composition 62 flows into and through the orifices within the tray 48 in the direction of the freezing chamber 12 (usually downward) during the production process.


The projections 44 preferably extend downwardly from the bottom wall 30 of the tray 28 toward the freezing chamber 12. As shown in FIG. 3, each projection 44 thus has, at its first end 66, an inlet opening that is in communication with the associated orifice and, at its second end 68, an outlet opening. A flow channel extends the entire length of each projection 44 from the inlet opening 66 to the outlet opening 68.


The projections 44 can be cylindrical and uniform in cross-section, but can also taper to become narrower toward their second end 68 if desired. For purposes of illustration, FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 depict cylindrical, non-tapered projections 44 which can be more widely available than tapered projections. Where the projections 44 are tapered, the inlet opening has a larger dimension than the outlet opening. Such narrowing of the flow channel 54 promotes regulated accumulation of the liquid composition 20 within the flow channel of the projection 44 and thus promotes regulated discharge of the liquid composition from the tray 28.


Another way to promote regulated accumulation within the flow channel of the projection 44 is to fabricate the projection 44 to be at least 0.75 inches long. In either case, this design further allows a droplet 58 to be formed in orderly fashion until the net gravity force overcomes the interfacial tension forces on the droplet 58 and it falls toward the freezing chamber 12.


Droplets released from prior art orifices sometimes break apart into smaller droplets 58, creating fragmented beads 56 of widely varying sizes and also resulting in further spattering. Undersized beads 56 distract from the unique and pleasing appearance of the more desirably sized beads 56 and thus it is desired to eliminate them from the final product where possible. Furthermore, the spattering created during droplet release and/or break-up generates minute particles that also fall into the freezing chamber 12 and form particles of frozen microbeads that accumulate at the bottom of the freezing chamber 12. This creates the need to shut the production process down to clean out the freezing chamber 12. Furthermore, the frozen microbeads represent wasted mix 62.


To overcome these and other problems, the projections 44 of the present invention promote the regulated discharge of the liquid composition from the tray 48 and the formation of more uniformly sized droplets 58 of liquid composition 20 that, when delivered to the freezing chamber 12, form more uniformly sized beads 56 of frozen product. In addition, the projections 44 reduce the spattering of minute particles of liquid composition 20 and thus reduce the formation of frozen dust that has previously accumulated at the bottom of the freezing chamber 12.


As stated, it has been determined that the projections 44 having a length of at least 0.75 inches create less broken beads and unwanted fragments. Vacuum molded plastic trays can be manufactured to have these lengths for projections, but such plastic trays wear out more quickly and cannot withstand the high temperature cleaning cycles. It is thus desired to make the trays out of a heavier, more durable substance such as stainless steel. Steel trays are more durable, but manually welding steel trays is both painstaking and time-consuming. One solution to this is to use threaded pipettes for the projections, which can be screwed into a tray and then welded. Such threaded combinations assists in more consistent welds. However, such threaded assemblies do not conform to USDA 3A standards for food production, because contaminants can work their way into the threaded surfaces which are not removable by cleaning processes. Also, the surfaces of the threads may adhere inconsistently, so that any sugars within the food products passed therethrough can work their way inside the threaded surfaces and cause oxidization and premature wear on the projections 44.


To solve these and other problems, computerized welding techniques which create the weld by a lower temperature, higher precision fusion process can reduce these obstacles yet still accommodate the heavier tray materials. To that end, FIG. 4 shows an exemplary computer screen from a computerized welding software program. Using such a computer design mechanism, the desired welds can be first set up in software and then implemented by an automated welding process that has no human intervention but instead receives and is directed by a software program which interprets information from the computer screen shown in FIG. 4. This is advantageous because computerized fusion welds achieve greater accuracy than manual welds. Also, traditional welds have the problem of impurities and crud working their way into the weld thereby making the welded surface uneven, pocked or pitted, subject to breakage, and inconsistent in size. Because the tray 48 of the present invention may be used to make millions of beads 56 or other commercial food products every day, exact consistency of the projection 44 and flow channel therein is crucial. All projections 44 and corresponding flow channels must be exactly the same size. This consistency can be difficult and time-consuming to achieve with manual welds. However, computerized welding techniques lend themselves well to achieving this desired accuracy.


The CAD drawing of a welding tray 48 shown in FIG. 4 provides specifications for a computerized fabrication mechanism. An operator can specify the type of weld, the technique used and the tolerances and finished appearance, i.e. buffed to 400 grit, to meet USDA 3A standards. Although not entirely shown in FIG. 4, there can be more than 500 projections 44 in a single tray 48. However, the actual number of projections 44 is not as important as their spacing, so that droplets 58 do not touch each other when falling into the vacuum chamber 12. This can result in forming clumps of beads 56 as the droplets 58 freeze, which is highly undesired.


The process used in the welding of the tray 48 can be an electron beam weld done in a vacuum chamber. This type of accuracy could also be performed by laser weld with a shielded gas or by gas tungsten arc weld (GTAW). The electron beam provides accuracy in penetration depth of the stainless material from which the tray 48 is formed. In a preferred embodiment, the entire welding process is controlled by computer with no human intervention. However, the tray 48 of the present invention could also be successfully achieved if done by a highly skilled welder. The main criteria is that the welded projections 44 meet USDA 3A standards for dairy equipment. Standards for dairy are different than from normal foods or FDA standards, in that dairy standards are more strict. The USDA 3A standard is generally accepted all over the world as a standard of safety for food producing equipment.


The computerized welding insures uniform penetration and no burn through as well as is less expensive due to lower hand labor involved. It is possible for good results to be obtained by hand welding but highly unlikely that a human could weld 500 or more projections 44 flawlessly with no craters or pits that would allow bacteria to settle. The projections 44 can be straight rather than tapered to be able to use readily available material off the shelf although tapered projections are acceptable also. The diameter and length of the projections 44 are important factors in that they govern the flow rate and the uniformity of the beaded product.


The present invention is easier to clean not only with detergents and sanitizers in a conventional cleaning in place (CIP) system, but can also be steam sterilized or autoclaved. One problem with plastic pipettes is that they sometimes fall into the freezing chamber 12 and then get mixed in within the beads 56. Being plastic, the broken pipettes could not be detected with metal detectors and were thus difficult to account for.



FIG. 5 shows another embodiment of the present invention involving an enclosed tray 148 that can have a pulse pump 180 feeding it to produce a precise dosing action. In this embodiment, a stainless tray with approximately 1″ depth has a cover welded or securely sealed to the top making it totally enclosed. The ice cream mix 162 can be delivered by a piston metering (pulse) pump 180, although other types of pumps are contemplated within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Once the enclosed tray 148 is filled, the feed is metered by piston pump to a precise volume. Each time the piston strokes, exactly one drop of mix comes out each of the array of projections 44. This method produces a precisely uniform droplet each time the piston stroked. As stated, the gravity methods described earlier can result in smaller droplets 158 forming immediately after a larger droplet 158 falls. This results in unwanted smaller beads 156 which can add up to as much as 15% of the amount of the total beads 156 produced, depending on the speed at which the cryogenic processor 10 is being operated. Thus, an enclosed tray 148 and accompanying dosing system can even further reduce the percentage of fragmented beads 156 thereby creating more uniformity in the product.


The pump 180 described above could be controlled by a programmable logic controller (PLC) that would be sensitive to the pressure within the enclosed tray 148. In an exemplary embodiment, the PLC could account for the number of trays being used and calculate the volume of mix to apply to the multiple trays 148. A pressure sensor and transmitter in each tray 148 would relay information back to the PLC to alter the signal to the pump as needed.


An enclosed tray 148 would have to have slightly smaller projections 44 and flow channels than those described in FIGS. 1-4, such as a 16 or 18 gauge depending on the viscosity of the product mix 162. This would be to prevent unwanted gravitational dropping thereof. These smaller gauge projections 44 should require a pressure beyond gravitational to produce the droplet.


As stated, a positive pressure piston pump 180 would be well suited for the application, but a similar effect could also be achieved with a lobe type positive displacement pump or even a paristaltic pump. As shown in FIG. 5, a pump pressure transmitter 184 could be attached to the top of the tray 148 with the sensing unit flush with the top of the tray 148, for easy removal. The pressure transmitter 184 could be placed anywhere and be functional, but it will be best for sanitary application to insert it through the top of the tray covering, and extend up out of the processor lid. A pump feed line would be in turn attached to the pressure transmitter 184 that is attached to the top of the tray also.


It is also a desired feature of the enclosed tray 148 that the size of the projection 144 be too small for gravity to pull the droplet through keeping the tray from forming droplets until a specific amount of pressure is applied. The intermittent action of the piston pump will cause the tray to pressurize forming a droplet, and depressurize when the droplet separates from the projection. This cycling of the pump at a specific RPM will keep the flow of droplets constant. By increasing the RPM, the flow of product will increase up to a limit in which the pressure would become great enough to make the liquid stream instead of exit in droplets. The pressure transmitter 184 will send the signals back to the PLC to maintain the pressure to the correct amount to provide for optimal droplet uniformity and production capacity.


The enclosed tray 148 of the present invention could be used in other applications other than low-temperature to provide uniform droplet sizes in food preparation. One possible alternative application would be in the preparation of chocolate. Another may be in the preparation of candies.


Both trays 48 and 148 can be cleaned by attaching the pump feed line to a Clean In Place (CIP) system, which is advantageous because it does not require disassembling the entire cryogenic processor 10. The CIP system would flood the tray and create pressure to stream the cleaning solution through the projections. A velocity of 5 feet per second is required to meet federal sanitation standards.


It is anticipated that various changes may be made in the arrangement and operation of the system of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A dropper assembly for feeding liquid composition to a freezing chamber, comprising: at least one tray overlying a freezing chamber and disposed to receive liquid composition from a delivery source, said tray having a bottom wall with a plurality of orifices through which the received liquid composition is directed wherein the tray is enclosed and is responsive to a pulse pump operated using a piston;a plurality of projections extending perpendicular from a lower surface of said tray and disposed for regulated discharge of said liquid composition from said tray and for feeding said liquid composition to said freezing chamber in uniformly sized droplets, each of said plurality of projections being aligned in fluid communication with one of said plurality of orifices in said bottom wall of said tray; anda programmable logic controller configured to account for a number of trays being used and to calculate the volume of liquid composition to apply to each tray;wherein said projections are affixed to said orifices and said tray using a precision welding process.
  • 2. The dropper assembly as in claim 1, wherein each of said projections is downwardly disposed in relation to said tray.
  • 3. The dropper assembly as in claim 1, wherein each of said projections has a first end associated with said corresponding orifice and a second end spaced from said first end.
  • 4. The dropper assembly as in claim 3, wherein each of said projections has an inlet opening associated with said first end and an outlet opening associated with said second end.
  • 5. The dropper assembly as in claim 4, wherein each of said projections has a uniformly tapered flow channel extending from said inlet opening to said outlet opening.
  • 6. The dropper assembly as in claim 4, wherein each of said projections has a cylindrical flow channel extending from said inlet opening to said outlet opening.
  • 7. The dropper assembly of claim 1, wherein all surfaces conform to USDA 3A sanitary requirements for food surfaces.
  • 8. The dropper assembly of claim 1, wherein said tray is a large tray constructed to cover the freezing chamber.
  • 9. The dropper assembly of claim 8, wherein said tray has side walls attached to said bottom surface, wherein said side walls form an enclosure for receiving the liquid composition from an external source.
  • 10. The dropper assembly of claim 1, wherein said projections are fabricated to be at least 0.75 inches long.
  • 11. The dropper assembly of claim 1, wherein said dropper assembly is used to produce millions of beads or other commercial food products per day.
  • 12. The dropper assembly of claim 5, wherein all projections and corresponding flow channels are exactly the same size.
  • 13. The dropper assembly of claim 1, wherein each of said projections is welded to the tray by computerized welding techniques using a low temperature, high precision fusion welding process.
  • 14. The dropper assembly of claim 13, wherein said welding process is an electron beam weld performed in a vacuum chamber.
  • 15. The dropper assembly of claim 13, wherein said fusion welding process is a laser weld using shielded gas.
  • 16. The dropper assembly of claim 13, wherein said fusion welding process further comprises gas tungsten arc welding.
  • 17. The dropper assembly of claim 13, wherein the projections are attached to the tray using manual welds.
  • 18. The dropper assembly of claim 1 wherein each time the piston strokes, exactly one drop of liquid composition comes out each of the array of projections.
  • 19. The dropper assembly of claim 18, wherein size of the orifice within each of said projections is significantly small that gravity may not pull a droplet therethrough, without also applying a predetermined amount of pressure.
  • 20. The dropper assembly of claim 18, wherein the enclosed tray is used in the preparation of chocolate, and or candy food products.
  • 21. The dropper assembly of claim 1, wherein said tray comprises a plurality of smaller trays which combine to cover the freezing chamber.
  • 22. The dropper assembly of claim 21, wherein a pressure sensing unit and transmitter within each of the plurality of trays relays information back to the programmable logic controller to alter the signal to the pump as needed.
  • 23. The dropper assembly of claim 22, wherein said pressure sensing unit is located flush with the top of the tray, is inserted through the top of a tray covering, and extends upward out of a processor lid.
  • 24. The dropper assembly of claim 22, wherein a pump feed line is attached to the pressure transmitter.
  • 25. The dropper assembly of claim 24, wherein the tray is cleaned by attaching the pump feed line to a clean in place system, which floods the tray with cleaning liquid and creates pressure to stream the cleaning solution through the projections.
  • 26. The dropper assembly of claim 25, wherein said clean in place system operates at a velocity of 5 feet per second.
US Referenced Citations (152)
Number Name Date Kind
1467615 Fairbanks Sep 1923 A
1538730 Obersohn et al. May 1925 A
1612167 Beardsley et al. Dec 1926 A
2059733 Heisser Nov 1936 A
2263259 Boosey Nov 1941 A
2448802 Holzcker Sep 1948 A
2507873 Ward May 1950 A
2541984 Chandler Feb 1951 A
2545140 Escher Mar 1951 A
2708055 Alexander May 1955 A
2715484 Alexander Aug 1955 A
2875588 Berger Mar 1959 A
2893605 Anderson Jul 1959 A
3023171 Smith Feb 1962 A
3057522 Reed Oct 1962 A
3060510 Fischer et al. Oct 1962 A
3089316 Robbins May 1963 A
3097501 Pappas Jul 1963 A
3162019 Porter et al. Dec 1964 A
3228838 Rinfret et al. Jan 1966 A
3291076 Flanigan et al. Dec 1966 A
3320694 Biron May 1967 A
3344617 Rinfret et al. Oct 1967 A
3360384 Kurzinski et al. Dec 1967 A
3613775 Curtis Oct 1971 A
3647478 Minor et al. Mar 1972 A
3756372 Mertens Sep 1973 A
3832764 Fletcher et al. Sep 1974 A
3857974 Aref et al. Dec 1974 A
3889701 Mueller Jun 1975 A
3896923 Griffith Jul 1975 A
3955596 Diaz May 1976 A
4009740 Michielli Mar 1977 A
4031262 Nakayama et al. Jun 1977 A
4077227 Larson Mar 1978 A
4109966 Boyhont et al. Aug 1978 A
4114427 Iguchi et al. Sep 1978 A
4159721 Horter Jul 1979 A
4218786 Taglarino Aug 1980 A
4220242 Forsberg Sep 1980 A
4228802 Trott Oct 1980 A
4235187 Mirza Nov 1980 A
4251547 Liggett Feb 1981 A
4310559 Mita et al. Jan 1982 A
4344361 MacPhee et al. Aug 1982 A
4353927 Lovercheck Oct 1982 A
4363223 Abbott Dec 1982 A
4380284 Ito et al. Apr 1983 A
4401402 Casperson Aug 1983 A
4408944 Christian Oct 1983 A
4445627 Horak May 1984 A
4446651 Spitz, Jr. et al. May 1984 A
4506851 Gupta et al. Mar 1985 A
4509339 Mehlan et al. Apr 1985 A
4565100 Malinoff Jan 1986 A
4569204 Ott et al. Feb 1986 A
4594739 Watts et al. Jun 1986 A
4613275 Karlowsky Sep 1986 A
4642905 Barlebo et al. Feb 1987 A
4655047 Temple et al. Apr 1987 A
4687672 Vitkovsky Aug 1987 A
4704873 Imaike et al. Nov 1987 A
4730750 Ficken Mar 1988 A
4738687 Smieskol et al. Apr 1988 A
4741178 Fujiu et al. May 1988 A
4748817 Oura et al. Jun 1988 A
4831841 Falk May 1989 A
4881663 Seymour Nov 1989 A
4920764 Martin May 1990 A
4957123 McHugh Sep 1990 A
4982577 Milankov et al. Jan 1991 A
4993238 Inagaki Feb 1991 A
5009254 Brunner Apr 1991 A
5027698 Chirnomas Jul 1991 A
5075905 Rutherford Dec 1991 A
5085244 Funk Feb 1992 A
5089123 DeVoe Feb 1992 A
5121854 Trouteaud et al. Jun 1992 A
5126156 Jones Jun 1992 A
5154825 Kupka Oct 1992 A
5203614 Robbins et al. Apr 1993 A
5219445 Bartenbach Jun 1993 A
5219455 Trucco Jun 1993 A
5224415 McFadden et al. Jul 1993 A
5232027 Tanaka et al. Aug 1993 A
5281429 Zevlakis Jan 1994 A
5305615 McFadden et al. Apr 1994 A
5307640 Fawzy et al. May 1994 A
5318444 Kuzub et al. Jun 1994 A
5319939 McFadden et al. Jun 1994 A
5348606 Hanaway et al. Sep 1994 A
5355992 Baig et al. Oct 1994 A
5378483 Fazio et al. Jan 1995 A
5400614 Feola Mar 1995 A
5403611 Tomita et al. Apr 1995 A
5405054 Thomas Apr 1995 A
5417081 Rudick et al. May 1995 A
5421484 Beach Jun 1995 A
5463878 Parekh et al. Nov 1995 A
5464119 Giuseppe et al. Nov 1995 A
5557944 Hirano et al. Sep 1996 A
5573660 Eicker et al. Nov 1996 A
5620732 Clemmings et al. Apr 1997 A
5657684 Chaikowsky Aug 1997 A
5657852 Bavington Aug 1997 A
5664422 Jones Sep 1997 A
5669288 Zittel et al. Sep 1997 A
5669531 Hagemeyer Sep 1997 A
5704216 Hirano et al. Jan 1998 A
5714043 Finley et al. Feb 1998 A
5718119 Wakita et al. Feb 1998 A
5722529 Manjunath et al. Mar 1998 A
5772072 Prescott et al. Jun 1998 A
5798038 Huber Aug 1998 A
5800116 Smith et al. Sep 1998 A
5813242 Lawrence et al. Sep 1998 A
5842349 Wakita et al. Dec 1998 A
5948456 Jones et al. Sep 1999 A
5958493 Grigoli Sep 1999 A
5988357 Memory et al. Nov 1999 A
6000229 Jones et al. Dec 1999 A
6041611 Palmer Mar 2000 A
6050391 Terry Apr 2000 A
6060099 Ito May 2000 A
6068108 Dudley May 2000 A
6089747 Huang Jul 2000 A
6103287 Soehnlen et al. Aug 2000 A
6145701 Van Der Merwe et al. Nov 2000 A
6174550 Fletcher et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182677 Pignataro Feb 2001 B1
6209329 Jones et al. Apr 2001 B1
6209590 Mandsberg Apr 2001 B1
6223542 Jones et al. May 2001 B1
6244388 Yun Jun 2001 B1
6250794 Huang Jun 2001 B1
6261050 Kuhns Jul 2001 B1
6267049 Silvano Jul 2001 B1
6318889 Hansen, Sr. Nov 2001 B1
6355290 Soehnlen et al. Mar 2002 B1
6403042 Goeldner Jun 2002 B1
6427458 Fowler Aug 2002 B1
6494049 Jones et al. Dec 2002 B1
6510890 Paskach et al. Jan 2003 B1
6539743 Jones Apr 2003 B2
6555154 Jones et al. Apr 2003 B2
6584995 Kimbrough et al. Jul 2003 B2
6659113 Wilcher Dec 2003 B2
6679083 Erickson Jan 2004 B1
6915896 Jones Jul 2005 B2
20020129616 Jones Sep 2002 A1
20030077364 Feola Apr 2003 A1
20030216470 Fink Nov 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
964921 Mar 1975 CA
1172146 Oct 2004 CN
332287 Sep 1989 EP
641522 Mar 1995 EP
1068484 Jan 2001 EP
1362007 Nov 2003 EP
964921 Mar 1975 FR
1264439 Feb 1972 GB
1376972 Dec 1974 GB
2092880 Aug 1982 GB
2396400 Jun 2004 GB
780138049 Nov 1978 JP
790173530 Dec 1979 JP
55 064761 May 1980 JP
56 096667 Aug 1981 JP
900205121 Aug 1990 JP
04 091749 Mar 1992 JP
20315895 Mar 1995 RU
WO199629896 Oct 1996 WO
PCTUS199902091 Feb 1999 WO
PCTGB199901042 Apr 1999 WO
WO199939153 Aug 1999 WO
WO199951934 Oct 1999 WO