This invention relates generally to a tray used in manufacturing particulate ice cream.
Manufacturing particulate food products, such as beads of ice cream has become an increasingly profitable business. However, there can be a wide range in the sizes of frozen ice cream beads. Unfortunately, liquid particles or specks are sometimes released from the trays, which results in the formation of frozen fragments. The fragments are not only undesirable in appearance, but also adversely affect the collection of usable product. Thus, the formation of fragments introduces inefficiency into the process of preparing the frozen beaded ice cream products.
Accordingly, it is desired to eliminate the formation of frozen particulate fragments during product manufacture. Using advanced specialized welding, a structural modification can be made to a feed tray to make the feed tray more easily cleanable, more durable, yet still conform with USDA 3A sanitary requirements.
This invention has as its primary objective a dropper assembly for feeding liquid composition to a freezing chamber which includes a tray overlying a freezing chamber. That tray is disposed to receive liquid composition from a delivery source and has a bottom wall with a plurality of orifices through which the received liquid composition is directed, as well as a plurality of projections extending perpendicular from a lower surface of the tray and for regulating discharge of the liquid composition from the tray and for feeding said liquid composition to said freezing chamber in uniformly sized droplets.
It is a further object of the present invention is to provide each of the plurality of projections being aligned in fluid communication with one of the plurality of orifices in the bottom wall of the tray, where the projections are affixed to the tray using a precision welding process. A further object of the present invention is to provide a method of operating the dropper assembly described above.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become readily apparent as the following description is read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Having summarized various aspects of the present invention, reference will now be made in detail to the description of the invention as illustrated in the drawings. While the invention will be described in connection with these drawings, there is no intent to limit it to the embodiment or embodiments disclosed therein. On the contrary, the intent is to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The cryogenic processor 10 includes a freezing chamber 12 that is most preferably in the form of a conical tank that holds a liquid refrigerant therein. The freezing chamber 12 incorporates an inner shell 14 and an outer shell 16. Insulation 18 is disposed between the inner shell 14 and outer shell 16 in order to increase the thermal efficiency of the chamber 12. Vents 20 are provided to ventilate the insulated area formed between the shells 14 and 16. The freezing chamber 12 is a free-standing unit supported by legs 22. Alternatively, the freezing chamber 12 may be disposed in a frame that is specially built to support the processor while in use.
A refrigerant 24, preferably liquid nitrogen in view of its known freezing capabilities, enters the freezing chamber 12 by means of refrigerant inlet 26. The refrigerant 24 entering chamber 12 through inlet 26 is used to maintain a predetermined level of liquid refrigerant in the freezing chamber and must be added to replace refrigerant 24 that is lost by evaporation or by other means incidental to production. Any gaseous refrigerant that has evaporated from the surface of the liquid refrigerant 24 in freezing chamber 12 primarily vents to the atmosphere through exit port 29 which cooperates with the vacuum assembly 30, which can be in the form of a venturi nozzle. Extraction of the frozen beads occurs through the product outlet 32 adapted at the base of the freezing chamber 12.
An ambient air inlet port 28 with adjustment doors 38 and exit port 29 with adjustment doors 39 are provided to adjust the level of gaseous refrigerant which evaporates from the surface of the liquid refrigerant 24 so that excessive pressure is not built up within the processor 10 and freezing of the liquid composition in the feed assembly 40 does not occur.
As shown in
In order to create uniformly sized beads 56 of frozen food products, uniformly sized droplets 58 of liquid composition are required to be fed through gas diffusion chamber 46 to freezing chamber 12. The feed tray 48 works with the feed assembly 40 to form droplets 58 of the desired character. When the droplets 58 of liquid composition contact the refrigerant vapor in the gas diffusion chamber 46, beads 56 that are formed which fall to the bottom of chamber 12. A transport system connects to the bottom of chamber 12 at outlet 32 to carry the beads 56 to a packaging and distribution network for later delivery and consumption.
A vacuum assembly 30 cooperates with air inlet 28 and adjustment doors 38 so that an ambient air flow passes through the inlet and around feed assembly 40 to ensure that no liquid composition freezes therein. This is accomplished by mounting the vacuum assembly 30 and air inlet 28 on opposing sides of the gas diffusion chamber 46 such that the incoming ambient air drawn by the vacuum assembly 30 is aligned with the feed assembly. In this configuration, ambient air flows around the feed assembly warming it to a sufficient temperature to inhibit the formation of frozen liquid composition in the feed assembly flow channels. Air source 60, typically in the form of an air compressor, is attached to vacuum assembly 30 to provide appropriate suction to create the ambient air flow required.
As shown in
As shown in
The projections 44 preferably extend downwardly from the bottom wall 30 of the tray 28 toward the freezing chamber 12. As shown in
The projections 44 can be cylindrical and uniform in cross-section, but can also taper to become narrower toward their second end 68 if desired. For purposes of illustration,
Another way to promote regulated accumulation within the flow channel of the projection 44 is to fabricate the projection 44 to be at least 0.75 inches long. In either case, this design further allows a droplet 58 to be formed in orderly fashion until the net gravity force overcomes the interfacial tension forces on the droplet 58 and it falls toward the freezing chamber 12.
Droplets released from prior art orifices sometimes break apart into smaller droplets 58, creating fragmented beads 56 of widely varying sizes and also resulting in further spattering. Undersized beads 56 distract from the unique and pleasing appearance of the more desirably sized beads 56 and thus it is desired to eliminate them from the final product where possible. Furthermore, the spattering created during droplet release and/or break-up generates minute particles that also fall into the freezing chamber 12 and form particles of frozen microbeads that accumulate at the bottom of the freezing chamber 12. This creates the need to shut the production process down to clean out the freezing chamber 12. Furthermore, the frozen microbeads represent wasted mix 62.
To overcome these and other problems, the projections 44 of the present invention promote the regulated discharge of the liquid composition from the tray 48 and the formation of more uniformly sized droplets 58 of liquid composition 20 that, when delivered to the freezing chamber 12, form more uniformly sized beads 56 of frozen product. In addition, the projections 44 reduce the spattering of minute particles of liquid composition 20 and thus reduce the formation of frozen dust that has previously accumulated at the bottom of the freezing chamber 12.
As stated, it has been determined that the projections 44 having a length of at least 0.75 inches create less broken beads and unwanted fragments. Vacuum molded plastic trays can be manufactured to have these lengths for projections, but such plastic trays wear out more quickly and cannot withstand the high temperature cleaning cycles. It is thus desired to make the trays out of a heavier, more durable substance such as stainless steel. Steel trays are more durable, but manually welding steel trays is both painstaking and time-consuming. One solution to this is to use threaded pipettes for the projections, which can be screwed into a tray and then welded. Such threaded combinations assists in more consistent welds. However, such threaded assemblies do not conform to USDA 3A standards for food production, because contaminants can work their way into the threaded surfaces which are not removable by cleaning processes. Also, the surfaces of the threads may adhere inconsistently, so that any sugars within the food products passed therethrough can work their way inside the threaded surfaces and cause oxidization and premature wear on the projections 44.
To solve these and other problems, computerized welding techniques which create the weld by a lower temperature, higher precision fusion process can reduce these obstacles yet still accommodate the heavier tray materials. To that end,
The CAD drawing of a welding tray 48 shown in
The process used in the welding of the tray 48 can be an electron beam weld done in a vacuum chamber. This type of accuracy could also be performed by laser weld with a shielded gas or by gas tungsten arc weld (GTAW). The electron beam provides accuracy in penetration depth of the stainless material from which the tray 48 is formed. In a preferred embodiment, the entire welding process is controlled by computer with no human intervention. However, the tray 48 of the present invention could also be successfully achieved if done by a highly skilled welder. The main criteria is that the welded projections 44 meet USDA 3A standards for dairy equipment. Standards for dairy are different than from normal foods or FDA standards, in that dairy standards are more strict. The USDA 3A standard is generally accepted all over the world as a standard of safety for food producing equipment.
The computerized welding insures uniform penetration and no burn through as well as is less expensive due to lower hand labor involved. It is possible for good results to be obtained by hand welding but highly unlikely that a human could weld 500 or more projections 44 flawlessly with no craters or pits that would allow bacteria to settle. The projections 44 can be straight rather than tapered to be able to use readily available material off the shelf although tapered projections are acceptable also. The diameter and length of the projections 44 are important factors in that they govern the flow rate and the uniformity of the beaded product.
The present invention is easier to clean not only with detergents and sanitizers in a conventional cleaning in place (CIP) system, but can also be steam sterilized or autoclaved. One problem with plastic pipettes is that they sometimes fall into the freezing chamber 12 and then get mixed in within the beads 56. Being plastic, the broken pipettes could not be detected with metal detectors and were thus difficult to account for.
The pump 180 described above could be controlled by a programmable logic controller (PLC) that would be sensitive to the pressure within the enclosed tray 148. In an exemplary embodiment, the PLC could account for the number of trays being used and calculate the volume of mix to apply to the multiple trays 148. A pressure sensor and transmitter in each tray 148 would relay information back to the PLC to alter the signal to the pump as needed.
An enclosed tray 148 would have to have slightly smaller projections 44 and flow channels than those described in
As stated, a positive pressure piston pump 180 would be well suited for the application, but a similar effect could also be achieved with a lobe type positive displacement pump or even a paristaltic pump. As shown in
It is also a desired feature of the enclosed tray 148 that the size of the projection 144 be too small for gravity to pull the droplet through keeping the tray from forming droplets until a specific amount of pressure is applied. The intermittent action of the piston pump will cause the tray to pressurize forming a droplet, and depressurize when the droplet separates from the projection. This cycling of the pump at a specific RPM will keep the flow of droplets constant. By increasing the RPM, the flow of product will increase up to a limit in which the pressure would become great enough to make the liquid stream instead of exit in droplets. The pressure transmitter 184 will send the signals back to the PLC to maintain the pressure to the correct amount to provide for optimal droplet uniformity and production capacity.
The enclosed tray 148 of the present invention could be used in other applications other than low-temperature to provide uniform droplet sizes in food preparation. One possible alternative application would be in the preparation of chocolate. Another may be in the preparation of candies.
Both trays 48 and 148 can be cleaned by attaching the pump feed line to a Clean In Place (CIP) system, which is advantageous because it does not require disassembling the entire cryogenic processor 10. The CIP system would flood the tray and create pressure to stream the cleaning solution through the projections. A velocity of 5 feet per second is required to meet federal sanitation standards.
It is anticipated that various changes may be made in the arrangement and operation of the system of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1467615 | Fairbanks | Sep 1923 | A |
1538730 | Obersohn et al. | May 1925 | A |
1612167 | Beardsley et al. | Dec 1926 | A |
2059733 | Heisser | Nov 1936 | A |
2263259 | Boosey | Nov 1941 | A |
2448802 | Holzcker | Sep 1948 | A |
2507873 | Ward | May 1950 | A |
2541984 | Chandler | Feb 1951 | A |
2545140 | Escher | Mar 1951 | A |
2708055 | Alexander | May 1955 | A |
2715484 | Alexander | Aug 1955 | A |
2875588 | Berger | Mar 1959 | A |
2893605 | Anderson | Jul 1959 | A |
3023171 | Smith | Feb 1962 | A |
3057522 | Reed | Oct 1962 | A |
3060510 | Fischer et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3089316 | Robbins | May 1963 | A |
3097501 | Pappas | Jul 1963 | A |
3162019 | Porter et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3228838 | Rinfret et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
3291076 | Flanigan et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3320694 | Biron | May 1967 | A |
3344617 | Rinfret et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3360384 | Kurzinski et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
3613775 | Curtis | Oct 1971 | A |
3647478 | Minor et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3756372 | Mertens | Sep 1973 | A |
3832764 | Fletcher et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3857974 | Aref et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3889701 | Mueller | Jun 1975 | A |
3896923 | Griffith | Jul 1975 | A |
3955596 | Diaz | May 1976 | A |
4009740 | Michielli | Mar 1977 | A |
4031262 | Nakayama et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4077227 | Larson | Mar 1978 | A |
4109966 | Boyhont et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4114427 | Iguchi et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4159721 | Horter | Jul 1979 | A |
4218786 | Taglarino | Aug 1980 | A |
4220242 | Forsberg | Sep 1980 | A |
4228802 | Trott | Oct 1980 | A |
4235187 | Mirza | Nov 1980 | A |
4251547 | Liggett | Feb 1981 | A |
4310559 | Mita et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4344361 | MacPhee et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4353927 | Lovercheck | Oct 1982 | A |
4363223 | Abbott | Dec 1982 | A |
4380284 | Ito et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4401402 | Casperson | Aug 1983 | A |
4408944 | Christian | Oct 1983 | A |
4445627 | Horak | May 1984 | A |
4446651 | Spitz, Jr. et al. | May 1984 | A |
4506851 | Gupta et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4509339 | Mehlan et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4565100 | Malinoff | Jan 1986 | A |
4569204 | Ott et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4594739 | Watts et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4613275 | Karlowsky | Sep 1986 | A |
4642905 | Barlebo et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4655047 | Temple et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4687672 | Vitkovsky | Aug 1987 | A |
4704873 | Imaike et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4730750 | Ficken | Mar 1988 | A |
4738687 | Smieskol et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4741178 | Fujiu et al. | May 1988 | A |
4748817 | Oura et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4831841 | Falk | May 1989 | A |
4881663 | Seymour | Nov 1989 | A |
4920764 | Martin | May 1990 | A |
4957123 | McHugh | Sep 1990 | A |
4982577 | Milankov et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4993238 | Inagaki | Feb 1991 | A |
5009254 | Brunner | Apr 1991 | A |
5027698 | Chirnomas | Jul 1991 | A |
5075905 | Rutherford | Dec 1991 | A |
5085244 | Funk | Feb 1992 | A |
5089123 | DeVoe | Feb 1992 | A |
5121854 | Trouteaud et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5126156 | Jones | Jun 1992 | A |
5154825 | Kupka | Oct 1992 | A |
5203614 | Robbins et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5219445 | Bartenbach | Jun 1993 | A |
5219455 | Trucco | Jun 1993 | A |
5224415 | McFadden et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5232027 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5281429 | Zevlakis | Jan 1994 | A |
5305615 | McFadden et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307640 | Fawzy et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318444 | Kuzub et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5319939 | McFadden et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5348606 | Hanaway et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5355992 | Baig et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5378483 | Fazio et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5400614 | Feola | Mar 1995 | A |
5403611 | Tomita et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405054 | Thomas | Apr 1995 | A |
5417081 | Rudick et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421484 | Beach | Jun 1995 | A |
5463878 | Parekh et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5464119 | Giuseppe et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5557944 | Hirano et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573660 | Eicker et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5620732 | Clemmings et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5657684 | Chaikowsky | Aug 1997 | A |
5657852 | Bavington | Aug 1997 | A |
5664422 | Jones | Sep 1997 | A |
5669288 | Zittel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669531 | Hagemeyer | Sep 1997 | A |
5704216 | Hirano et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714043 | Finley et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718119 | Wakita et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722529 | Manjunath et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5772072 | Prescott et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5798038 | Huber | Aug 1998 | A |
5800116 | Smith et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813242 | Lawrence et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5842349 | Wakita et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5948456 | Jones et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958493 | Grigoli | Sep 1999 | A |
5988357 | Memory et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000229 | Jones et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6041611 | Palmer | Mar 2000 | A |
6050391 | Terry | Apr 2000 | A |
6060099 | Ito | May 2000 | A |
6068108 | Dudley | May 2000 | A |
6089747 | Huang | Jul 2000 | A |
6103287 | Soehnlen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6145701 | Van Der Merwe et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6174550 | Fletcher et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182677 | Pignataro | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209329 | Jones et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6209590 | Mandsberg | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223542 | Jones et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6244388 | Yun | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250794 | Huang | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261050 | Kuhns | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267049 | Silvano | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6318889 | Hansen, Sr. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6355290 | Soehnlen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6403042 | Goeldner | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427458 | Fowler | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6494049 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510890 | Paskach et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539743 | Jones | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555154 | Jones et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6584995 | Kimbrough et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6659113 | Wilcher | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679083 | Erickson | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6915896 | Jones | Jul 2005 | B2 |
20020129616 | Jones | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030077364 | Feola | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030216470 | Fink | Nov 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
964921 | Mar 1975 | CA |
1172146 | Oct 2004 | CN |
332287 | Sep 1989 | EP |
641522 | Mar 1995 | EP |
1068484 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1362007 | Nov 2003 | EP |
964921 | Mar 1975 | FR |
1264439 | Feb 1972 | GB |
1376972 | Dec 1974 | GB |
2092880 | Aug 1982 | GB |
2396400 | Jun 2004 | GB |
780138049 | Nov 1978 | JP |
790173530 | Dec 1979 | JP |
55 064761 | May 1980 | JP |
56 096667 | Aug 1981 | JP |
900205121 | Aug 1990 | JP |
04 091749 | Mar 1992 | JP |
20315895 | Mar 1995 | RU |
WO199629896 | Oct 1996 | WO |
PCTUS199902091 | Feb 1999 | WO |
PCTGB199901042 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO199939153 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO199951934 | Oct 1999 | WO |