The invention generally relates to a tray positioning device and method of use and, more particularly, to a tray positioning device to stack product in a tray in either a horizontal orientation or vertical orientation and method of use.
The sorting of mail is a very complex, time consuming task. In general, the sorting of mail is processed through many stages, including back end processes, which stack mail pieces in a tub or container in delivery order sequence. These processes can either be manual or automated, depending on the mail sorting facility, the type of mail to be sorted such as packages, flats, letters and the like. A host of other factors may also contribute to the automation of the mail sorting, from budgetary concerns to modernization initiatives to access to appropriate technologies to a host of other factors.
In general, however, most modern facilities have taken major steps toward automation by the implementation of a number of technologies. These technologies include, amongst others, letter sorters, parcel sorters, advanced tray conveyors, flat sorters, stacking devices and the like. As a result of these developments, postal facilities have become quite automated over the years, considerably reducing overhead costs and increasing mail throughput.
By way of example, in front end processes, sorting and sequencing systems are capable of sequencing mail pieces and other product based on a two pass algorithm system. Of course, other known systems can equally be used to sort mail pieces and other product, a host of them readily available and known to those of ordinary skill in the art. As the mail pieces are ejected from the system, after being sorted or sequenced, they may be manually placed into a container. However, this manual process is very time consuming, costly and error prone.
In some applications, the mail pieces may be fed automatically into a tray or tub. However, these known systems are designed only to place the mail pieces in one orientation and thus do not exhibit the flexibility needed by the ever evolving requirements of the United States Postal System (USPS). For example, in one known device, the mail pieces or other product are unloaded to containers located at each drop off point, via chutes. In this manner, the mail pieces are slid down the chutes into the containers and are stacked within the containers in a horizontal orientation.
Although these horizontal automation systems have provided many benefits, they still lack the required flexibility to stack product in a vertical orientation, a requirement that may become essential by the ever increasing demands of the USPS e.g., the need for both horizontal and vertical stacking. In fact, there is no known single machine that is capable of meeting such requirements of the USPS. Thus, currently known systems cannot provide the required design flexibility to enhance the productivity and overall evolving efficiencies demanded by the postal system and other customers.
The invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems as set forth above.
In a first aspect of the invention, a system for positioning a tray includes a stationary conveyor for transporting the tray. A tray carriage is in a tray transportation path with the conveyor. The tray carriage is moveable from a lowered position to an elevated position and an inclined position for stacking product in a horizontal orientation or a vertical orientation, respectively, in the tray.
In a another aspect of the invention, the system includes a stationary conveyor and a tray carriage moveable from a nested position with respect to the conveyor to either a raised, horizontal position to stack the product in a horizontal orientation in the tray or a raised, inclined position to stack the product in an inclined orientation in the tray. At least one raised mechanism is provided for at least registering the tray on the tray carriage.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of stacking product in either a horizontal orientation or a vertical orientation is provided. If stacking is to be in the horizontal orientation then the following steps are performed:
If stacking is to be in the vertical orientation, then the following steps are to be performed:
The foregoing and other aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
The invention is directed to a tray positioning device designed to orient a tray for stacking product therein in either a vertical orientation or a horizontal orientation. The product may be, for example, flats and other mail items (i.e., letters), for future delivery or warehousing or the like. The invention significantly reduces machine costs by allowing a single machine to stack product in delivery point sequence, in embodiments, in a vertical orientation or a horizontal orientation. Other applications such as warehousing and storage applications are also contemplated for use with the invention.
In one aspect of the invention, the system contains two degrees of freedom in motion:
For both horizontal and vertical stacking of product in the tray, the tray is indexed onto a carriage system, and registered by a stop or other mechanism. The tray is lifted to a height of a delivery belt for induction of product into the tray, in either a horizontal or vertical orientation. In either orientation, the conveyor will remain stationary, while the tray carriage system is either raised into a horizontal position or raised and rotated into an inclined position for horizontal or vertical stacking of product, respectively, in a tray. Additionally, features of the invention are designed to ensure that the tray remains substantially stationary, will not topple or rotate, and that the product remains within the tray during processing.
The tray positioning device 100 further includes a frame member 125, which is preferably a module frame member capable of being retrofitted to any known tray conveyor system or sequencing device, as a back end system. An actuator assembly, generally depicted as reference numeral 130, is mounted to the frame member 125 and is designed to move a tray carriage 200 into any of the positions shown in
The actuator assembly 130 is a multi-axis lifting mechanism fixed between the tray carriage 200 and the frame 125. The multi-axis lifting mechanism includes a linear actuator 132 and a rotary device and bell crank linkage system 134. The linear actuator 132 is designed to move the tray carriage 200 into a parked position (
Still referring to
The tray carriage 200 further includes a plurality of notches 202a which align with axles of the segmented rollers 115. By having the notches 202a, preferably on the side panels 202, in one implementation, the tray carriage 200 can be positioned or located below a contacting or transporting surface of the segmented rollers 115, i.e., nested or recessed within the segmented rollers 115. The tray carriage 200 further includes a front stop mechanism 206a and a rear stop mechanism 206b. The stop mechanisms 206a and 206b may be, for example, a rod, knob or other mechanism, extending above a supporting surface 208 of the tray carriage 200. In the nested position,
In the horizontal stacking operational stage, the pins 202 slide within the vertical groove 120a1 and vertical portion of the camber shaped groove 120a2 to an upper position “A”. The upper portion of the groove is a limiter or stop for the travel of the tray carriage, thus ensuring that the tray is positioned at a predetermined height during the horizontal stacking operations. During the stacking, the height of the front stop mechanism 206a and the rear stop mechanism 206b ensures that the tray will be securely positioned on the tray carriage 200 during this operation.
Still referring to
The system of the invention may be used for a single carrier route at a time, multiple routes at once or for warehousing or other sequencing needs of products. Also, some or all of the different operational stages shown in
Initially, the tray carriage is in a lowered position, for example, in the position represented in
The tray carriage will then be lifted to position of
The sensor S2 (photodiode, proximity switch or the like) will determine when the tray is full or at another predetermined height. Once this determination is made, the tray carriage will bring the tray to the position of
To vertically stack the product, the tray carriage is moved to the raised, horizontal position of
The sensor S2 will determine when the tray is full or at another predetermined height. Once this determination is made, the tray carriage will bring the tray to the position of
While the invention has been described in terms of embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation in part of co-pending application Ser. No. 11/058,178 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2704614 | St. John | Mar 1955 | A |
2888126 | Feige et al. | May 1959 | A |
3291329 | Ord | Dec 1966 | A |
3486296 | Hechenleitner | Dec 1969 | A |
3890764 | Hartman | Jun 1975 | A |
3937456 | Gruodis et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4013183 | Milholen et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4019640 | Marin et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4051957 | Parups | Oct 1977 | A |
4364553 | Wilson | Dec 1982 | A |
4397599 | Sabel | Aug 1983 | A |
4518160 | Lambrechts et al. | May 1985 | A |
4757890 | Motoda | Jul 1988 | A |
4856263 | Schneider et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4979870 | Mojden et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5101963 | Skarlupka et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5301788 | Hironaka et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5318401 | Mandel | Jun 1994 | A |
5347790 | Romanenko et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5661949 | Blanc | Sep 1997 | A |
5692877 | Sixtensson | Dec 1997 | A |
5778640 | Prakken et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5909796 | Soldavini | Jun 1999 | A |
6105751 | Jentjens et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6168366 | Horn et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6220420 | Jan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220424 | Fluck | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238165 | Fletcher et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6257821 | Ward et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6328302 | Hendrickson et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6390278 | Brown | May 2002 | B1 |
6516934 | Masciarelli, Jr. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6536191 | Ruggiero | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543622 | Fridman | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6578700 | Smith et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579053 | Grams et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591965 | Smith et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6619464 | Peppel et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6694706 | Odenthal et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695302 | Lamothe | Feb 2004 | B1 |
7032738 | Tonnigs et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033130 | Watson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7096650 | Van Dam | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7137234 | Caporali et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
20050220580 | Arnold et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
352841 | Jan 1990 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060180435 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11058178 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 11097277 | US |