This description relates to containers, and specifically to trays having ribbing for strength.
Various trays are utilized for storage of contents, such as food products. Commonly, the intended uses of a specific tray can determine the strength that the tray requires. Increasing the sidewall thickness of a tray can increase the stacking strength of the tray, but the increased material required for the extra sidewall thickness can undesirably increase production costs. Ribbing extending vertically from an upper edge of a sidewall to a bottom wall is known to increase the stacking strength of a sidewall. As such, a thin sidewall with ribbing can have a stacking strength similar to a relatively thicker sidewall. For many purposes, a tray having a thin sidewall with vertical ribbing is sufficient.
Compressive strength is the capacity of a material or structure to withstand vertical loads. When the limit of compressive strength is reached, materials are crushed. Increased compressive strength can be important in food product storage because multiple containers can be stacked on top of one another for storage and display purposes. If too much weight is stacked on a container, the container can be crushed or otherwise deformed, and the appearance of the container and its contents negatively impacted. Accordingly, the compressive strength of the individual containers can limit the size of available storage receptacles and display configurations for groups of the containers.
A tray includes relatively thin thermoformed walls and being configured to receive and store a foodstuff. The tray is strengthened for supporting compressive loads when stacked or otherwise having objects stacked thereon. The tray includes a bottom wall having four corners and a sidewall extends about and upstanding from the bottom wall. The sidewall has an upper periphery, four corners, and a sidewall segment extending between adjacent pairs of the corners. In a first aspect, each of the sidewall segments has at least one continuous, protruding rib configured to redirect vertical compressive forces from a mid-point of the sidewall segment to each of the adjacent corners. Pursuant to this, the rib includes inclined portions proximate to the midpoint and extending at a downward inclination toward the bottom wall and opposing ones of the adjacent corners. In another aspect, each of the sidewall portions includes at least one outwardly protruding rib extending thereacross. The rib has a bell-shaped configuration with an upper vertex thereof positioned generally centrally on the respective sidewall portion and legs extending downwardly from the upper vertex to intersect adjacent sidewall corners at a height of the sidewall lower than the upper vertex.
A tray, as described herein, includes one or more ribs that increase the stacking or compressive strength of the tray and advantageously direct vertical compressive stacking forces to the relatively stronger portions of the tray. Specifically, the tray ribs direct the vertical compressive stacking loads from the intermediate portions of the sidewall downward and outward toward the adjacent corners, which are relatively stronger than adjacent portions of the sidewall or bottom wall. Pursuant to this, the ribs can have an at least partially curvilinear shape, and specifically a bell-shaped curve, between the intermediate portion of the sidewall and the adjacent corner thereof. In a preferred form, each rib includes an intermediate generally concave region such that the vertex of the concave region is higher on the sidewall than where its legs intersect the corners of the tray.
In another or alternative form, the tray can include one or more depressions that span from a bottom wall portion onto respective sidewall portions, such that the corner between the sidewall portions and the bottom wall is broken by the depressions and the sidewall portions do not directly intersect the bottom wall in the area of the depression. With such a configuration, a vertical rib extending on the sidewall would not reach the bottom wall in this area and therefore compressive loads would be transferred to this depression on the sidewall rather than a support surface underneath the tray or the relatively stronger corners of the tray. In one aspect, the one or more depressions can act as gripping portions that facilitate a user holding onto the tray, such as with a cupping hand configuration.
Advantageously, the ribs discussed above can include a generally complementary configuration to the depression extending onto the sidewall of the tray. Specifically, the bell-shaped curve can be at least partially complementary to a curved end of the depression on the tray sidewall. As discussed above, vertical ribs would disadvantageously intersect the depression along the sidewall prior to the bottom wall, which could decrease the stacking strength benefit provided by the vertical ribbing as compared to an otherwise flat sidewall. The curvilinear ribs described herein, however, advantageously increases the stacking strength of the tray while also extending at least partially along the gripping indentation on the tray sidewall.
Turning now to the figures, a tray 10 is illustrated having one or more ribs or steps 12 in a stacked configuration extending along a sidewall 14 of the tray 10 for increasing the strength thereof. The tray 10 includes a bottom wall portion 16 and the sidewall 14 extending upwardly therefrom. The bottom wall portion 16 and the sidewall 14 joining at corners 18. The bottom wall portion 16 is illustrated as generally rectangular in the figures so that the sidewall 14 includes end portions 20 and side portions 22, with depressions 70 giving the end portions 20 and the side portions 22 an inwardly curved intermediate portion so that the bottom wall portion 16 has a waisted appearance. The depressions 70 will be described in more detail below. The bottom wall portion 16, however, can take other shapes such as other regular and irregular polygons, curvilinear shapes, or combinations thereof. As shown, the end and side portions 20, 22 of the sidewall connect together at corners 24 of the sidewall 14. Inherent in such structures, the corners 24 have a relatively larger stacking strength as compared to the end and side portions 20, 22 of the sidewall 14. In the illustrated form, the corners 18, 24 are rounded but can have sharp edges if desired.
The sidewall 14 includes a shoulder or flange 26 extending outwardly along an entire perimeter thereof on an end 28 opposite from the bottom wall portion 16. A skirt 30 then depends generally downwardly from an outer edge 32 of the shoulder 26. Further, a lip 34 can extend outwardly from the skirt 30.
Turning now to details of the ribs 12 as shown in the figures. The form of the tray 10 shown in
In a preferred form, the tray 10 is thermoformed. Thermoforming the tray involves heating a plastic sheet to a pliable forming temperature, forming the heated plastic sheet into the tray in a mold, and trimming excess portions of the plastic sheet from the tray. With this forming process, the ribs 12 can take the form of generally horizontal steps that extend between an outwardly positioned upper segment of the sidewall 14 and an inwardly positioned lower segment of the sidewall 14, as shown in the figures. With other manufacturing processes, the ribs 12 can be protuberances extending outwardly or inwardly from the sidewall 14 with an upper edge of the protuberance being generally above the lower edge of the protuberance. The ribs 12 strength the compressive strength of the tray, which allows the thickness of the tray sidewall 14 with a desired compressive strength to be thinner than a tray without the ribs. In the illustrated form, the tray is formed from a sheet having a thickness of about 30 mils.
In the illustrated form of
A specific example of a three rib tray will be described with respect to
Referring now to the details of the rib side portions 54 shown in
Referring now to the details of the rib end portions 56 shown in
A specific example of a four rib tray will be described with respect to
The configuration of the ribs 58, 60, 62 on the four rib tray is substantially similar to the three rib tray discussed above. As shown in
For the rib side portions 64, the vertices 40 of upper rib 58 and the first intermediate rib 60 are spaced about 0.38 inches, the vertices 40 of the intermediate ribs 60 are spaced about 0.31 inches, and the vertices 40 of the second intermediate rib 60 and the bottom rib 62 are spaced about 0.31 inches. While the vertices 40 of the rib side portions 64 are positioned in the upper 60 percent of the sidewall end portion 20, the legs 42 thereof are spanned across a majority of the height of the sidewall 14 adjacent to the sidewall corners 24. In the illustrated form, the upper rib 58 has a relatively shallow profile with the legs 42 thereof intersecting the sidewall corners 24 about 0.31 inches below the vertex 40 thereof; the first intermediate rib 60 has a relatively deeper profile with the legs 42 thereof intersecting the sidewall corners 24 about 0.5 inches below the vertex 40 thereof; the second intermediate rib has a relatively deeper with the legs 42 thereof intersecting the sidewall corners 24 about 0.56 inches below the vertex 40 thereof, and the bottom rib 62 has the relatively deepest profile with the legs 42 thereof intersecting the sidewall corners about 0.75 inches below the vertex 40 thereof, or spaced 0.31 inches from the bottom wall portion 16.
For the rib end portions 66, the vertices 40 of upper rib 58 and the first intermediate rib 60 are spaced about 0.38 inches, the vertices 40 of the intermediate ribs 60 are spaced about 0.038 inches, and the vertices 40 of the second intermediate rib 60 and the bottom rib 62 are spaced about 0.44 inches. While the vertices 40 of the rib side portions 64 are positioned in the upper 60 percent of the sidewall end portion 20, the legs 42 thereof are spanned across a majority of the height of the sidewall 14 adjacent to the sidewall corners 24. In the illustrated form, the upper rib 58 has a relatively shallow profile with the legs 42 thereof intersecting the sidewall corners 24 about 0.31 inches below the vertex 40 thereof; the first intermediate rib 60 has a relatively deeper profile with the legs 42 thereof intersecting the sidewall corners 24 about 0.56 inches below the vertex 40 thereof the second intermediate rib has a relatively deeper with the legs 42 thereof intersecting the sidewall corners 24 about 0.63 inches below the vertex 40 thereof, and the bottom rib 62 has the relatively deepest profile with the legs 42 thereof intersecting the sidewall corners about 0.69 inches below the vertex 40 thereof, or spaced 0.31 inches from the bottom wall portion 16.
Turning now to
As best shown in
In the illustrated form, the upper end 28 of the side wall 14 has a rectangular configuration with the corners 24 thereof rounded. The rectangular configuration provides a consumer with full access to the various corners 24 of the sidewall 14, the corners 18 of the bottom wall 16, and the intersections therebetween. If desired, the gripping portions 70 could extend all the way through the sidewall 14 to the upper end 28 thereof. As such, the sidewall 14 would be an upstanding wall having the bone-shaped configuration of the bottom wall 16. Such a sidewall 14, however, would undesirably restrict access to the corners of the tray 10, such as with a utensil or the like.
The shoulder 26 and/or skirt 30 are preferably configured to releasably couple to a lid (not shown) and or have a film (not shown) attached thereto to store and/or seal contents within the tray. For example, a food product can be placed in the tray, a film can be sealed to the shoulder thereof to seal the food product within the tray, and then a lid can be snap-fit or otherwise releasably coupled to the tray. So configured, the tray can be stored, transported, and displayed for sale.
To test the compressive load benefit provided by the ribs described herein, a maximum compressive load test was conducted on five (5) trays having the three rib configuration as shown in
To conduct the tests, a preload compressive load was placed on each tray of between 5 and 12 lbf. The machine was then allowed to increase the compressive load on each tray until the maximum compressive load was determined. As shown, for every test, the curvilinear ribs described herein caused the tray to have an increased maximum compressive load over a similar tray without ribs. The trays without ribs had an average maximum compressive load of about 40.5 lbf while the trays with ribs had an average maximum compressive load of about 53.2 lbf. Therefore, the ribs described herein provided an approximately 31% increase in compressive strength from a tray without ribs.
The drawings and the foregoing descriptions are not intended to represent the only forms of the package in regards to the details of construction. Changes in form and in proportion of parts, as well as the substitution of equivalents, are contemplated as circumstances may suggest or render expedient.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2859557 | Lattuca | Nov 1958 | A |
2905350 | Edwards | Sep 1959 | A |
D212594 | Collie | Nov 1968 | S |
D213428 | Batdorf | Mar 1969 | S |
3519165 | Hawley | Jul 1970 | A |
4052037 | Mair et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
D253331 | Olschewski | Nov 1979 | S |
D282824 | Franek et al. | Mar 1986 | S |
5224623 | LaFleur | Jul 1993 | A |
D353518 | Cautereels et al. | Dec 1994 | S |
5381901 | Hundley | Jan 1995 | A |
D366211 | Buff et al. | Jan 1996 | S |
D391762 | Ahern, Jr. | Mar 1998 | S |
D414080 | Bolwien | Sep 1999 | S |
D469319 | Pettaweebuncha | Jan 2003 | S |
D469665 | Pettaweebuncha | Feb 2003 | S |
6554154 | Chauhan et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
D475620 | Chen et al. | Jun 2003 | S |
D485174 | Amar et al. | Jan 2004 | S |
6910599 | Tucker et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
D508187 | Dais et al. | Aug 2005 | S |
D514389 | Luna et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
D536608 | Arkins | Feb 2007 | S |
D539099 | Tucker et al. | Mar 2007 | S |
D539134 | Wallach | Mar 2007 | S |
7261219 | Tucker et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
D569722 | Stamper et al. | May 2008 | S |
D584108 | Olsson | Jan 2009 | S |
7546932 | Smith et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
D606811 | Furlong | Dec 2009 | S |
D608153 | Furlong | Jan 2010 | S |
D608154 | Furlong | Jan 2010 | S |
D613125 | Sierra et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
D613556 | Sierra et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
D615356 | Hillebrenner | May 2010 | S |
D616251 | Heiberg et al. | May 2010 | S |
D617144 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D629658 | Rusnak et al. | Dec 2010 | S |
D632527 | Olivari et al. | Feb 2011 | S |
D632528 | Olivari et al. | Feb 2011 | S |
D636230 | Koennecke | Apr 2011 | S |
D637041 | Haskell | May 2011 | S |
D641211 | Olivari et al. | Jul 2011 | S |
D641212 | Olivari et al. | Jul 2011 | S |
D641590 | Koennecke | Jul 2011 | S |
D646968 | Ortiz et al. | Oct 2011 | S |
D649396 | Wilkens et al. | Nov 2011 | S |
D656010 | Ortiz et al. | Mar 2012 | S |
D656815 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2012 | S |
D678050 | Birchmeier et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
D684855 | BeVier et al. | Jun 2013 | S |
D689363 | Sundy et al. | Sep 2013 | S |
D696938 | BeVier et al. | Jan 2014 | S |
20070119743 | Tucker et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080202969 | Tauer | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100065461 | Chhay | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100096288 | Feldmann et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130015096 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |