Treating inflammatory disorders by electrical vagus nerve stimulation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11344724
  • Patent Number
    11,344,724
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 22, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 31, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
A method and an apparatus for treating a patient suffering from, or at risk for, a condition mediated by the inflammatory cytokine cascade, by electrically stimulating vagus nerve activity in an amount sufficient to inhibit the inflammatory cytokine cascade.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Vertebrates achieve internal homeostasis during infection or injury by balancing the activities of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory pathways. However, in many disease conditions, this internal homeostasis becomes out of balance. For example, endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) produced by all Gram-negative bacteria activates macrophages to release cytokines that are potentially lethal (Tracey, K. J. et al., Science, 234:470-74 (1986); Dinarello, C. A., FASEB J., 8:1314-25 (1994); Wang, H., et al., Science, 285:248-51 (1999); Nathan, C. F., J. Clin. Invest., 79:319-26 (1987)).


Inflammation and other deleterious conditions (such as septic shock caused by endotoxin exposure) are often induced by proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF; also known as TNFα or cachectin), interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, interferony, platelet-activating factor (PAF), macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), and other compounds. Certain other compounds, for example high mobility group protein 1 (HMG-1), are induced during various conditions such as sepsis and can also serve as proinflammatory cytokines. Proinflammatory cytokines contribute to various disorders, notably sepsis, through their release during an inflammatory cytokine cascade. Inflammatory cytokine cascades contribute to deleterious characteristics, including inflammation and apoptosis, of numerous disorders.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a method and a device for treating cytokine-mediated inflammatory conditions.


The present invention is based, in part, on the discovery that inflammatory disorders, including ileus, can be treated in a subject by electrically stimulating the vagus nerve. Surprisingly, it has also been discovered that the parameters of an electrical signal sufficient to treat inflammatory disorders are significantly milder than the parameters previously shown to inhibit the inflammatory cytokine cascade. Thus, it has been discovered that inflammatory disorders can be treated by an electrical signal having its current or voltage significantly smaller than electrical signals previously shown to inhibit inflammation.


In one embodiment, the present invention is a method for treating a subject suffering from, or at risk for, an inflammatory disorder, comprising stimulating the vagus nerve in a subject with an electrical signal, wherein the signal voltage is from 0.01 Volt to 1 Volt, provided that the condition is not ileus, asthma or cystic fibrosis.


In another embodiment, the present invention is a method for treating a subject suffering from, or at risk for, an inflammatory disorder, comprising stimulating the vagus nerve in a subject with an electrical signal, wherein the signal voltage is from 0.01 Volt to 1 Volt, pulse width is from 0.1 ms to 5 ms; signal frequency is from 0.1 Hz to 30 Hz; signal on-time is from 1 second to 120 seconds; and signal off-time is over 2 hours.


In another embodiment, the present invention is an electrical signal generator and use thereof for treating a subject suffering from, or at risk for, an inflammatory disorder. The electrical signal generator comprises an electrode assembly for delivering an electrical signal to the vagus nerve of the subject and a controller controlling the electrical signal by limiting the signal voltage to a range from 0.01 Volt to 1 Volt.


In another embodiment, the present invention is an electrical signal generator and use thereof for treating a subject suffering from, or at risk for, an inflammatory disorder. The signal generator comprises an electrode assembly for delivering an electrical signal to the vagus nerve of the subject and a controller controlling the electrical signal by limiting the signal voltage to a range from 0.01 Volt to 1 Volt, pulse width to a range from 0.1 ms to 5 ms; signal frequency to a range from 0.1 Hz to 30 Hz; signal on-time to a range from 1 second to 120 seconds; and signal off-time to a range of over 2 hours.


Surprisingly, it has been discovered that electrical vagus nerve stimulation was sufficient for activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, as measured by serum TNF levels in mice, despite the mildness of the conditions of the vagus nerve stimulation (Example 1). The effective half-life of TNF suppression induced by electrical vagus nerve stimulation was between two and three days (Example 2), thus indicating that electrical stimulation is at least as long-lasting as pharmaceutical intervention. Furthermore, electrical vagus nerve stimulation improved severity of collagen-induced arthritis in rats (Example 3).





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram of an implantable embodiment of an electrical generator suitable for practicing the present invention.



FIG. 2 shows a suitable location of the electric signal generator and electrodes implanted in the patient's body.



FIG. 3 is an illustrative idealized electrical output signal waveform of the signal generator useful for clarifying relevant parameters of the output signal.



FIG. 4 is a bar plot representing the effect of the vagal electrical stimulation on endotoxemia as measured by a percent reduction of serum TNF level.



FIG. 5 is a plot showing the effect of electrical stimulation of VNS by an electrical signal on TNF production in LPS-challenged mice. Vertical axis indicates percent suppression of TNF, horizontal axis indicates hours elapsed between the VNS stimulation and LPS challenge.



FIG. 6 is a plot that shows an arthritis score in rats as a function of a number of days post collagen immunization to induced arthritis (PCID). VNS stimulation started on day 13 and continued till day 20.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

It has now been discovered that direct (e.g. electrical or mechanical) stimulation of vagus nerve of a subject alleviates the symptoms of inflammatory disorders, including ileus.


As used herein, a “subject” is preferably a mammal, more preferably a human patient but can also be a companion animal (e.g., dog or cat), a farm animal (e.g., horse, cow, or sheep) or a laboratory animal (e.g., rat, mouse, or guinea pig). Preferable, the subject is human.


As used herein, the term “vagus nerve” is used in its broadest sense, and includes any nerves that branch off from the main vagus nerve, as well as ganglions or postganglionic neurons that are connected to the vagus nerve. The vagus nerve is also known in the art as the parasympathetic nervous system and its branches, and the cholinergic nerve. The vagus nerve enervates principal organs including, the pharynx, the larynx, the esophagus, the heart, the lungs, the stomach, the pancreas, the spleen, the kidneys, the adrenal glands, the small and large intestine, the colon, and the liver. Stimulation can be accomplished by direct stimulation of the vagus nerve or an organ served by the vagus nerve.


As used herein, “direct stimulation” of the vagus nerve means activating or stimulating the vagus nerve by non-pharmacological means such as electrical, mechanical (e.g., vibration), heat or UV irradiation. Activation can be accomplished by direct stimulation of the vagus nerve or an organ served by the vagus nerve. The vagus nerve enervates principal organs including, the pharynx, the larynx, the esophagus, the heart, the lungs, the stomach, the pancreas, the spleen, the kidneys, the adrenal glands, the small and large intestine, the colon, and the liver.


The disclosed method includes stimulating the entire vagus nerve (i.e., both the afferent and efferent nerves), or by isolating efferent nerves and then stimulating them directly. The latter method can be accomplished by separating the afferent from the efferent fibers in an area of the nerve where both types of fibers are present. Alternatively, the efferent fiber is stimulated where no afferent fibers are present, for example close to the target organ served by the efferent fibers. The efferent fibers can also be activated by stimulating the target organ directly, e.g., electrically, thus stimulating the efferent fibers that serve that organ. In other embodiments, the ganglion or postganglionic neurons of the vagus nerve can be stimulated. The vagus nerve can also be cut and the distal end can be stimulated, thus only stimulating efferent vagus nerve fibers.


The vagus nerve can be stimulated by numerous methods including manually, mechanically, electrically or by electromagnetic radiation. Mechanical means of nerve stimulation include stimulation by needle (e.g., acupuncture). There is evidence that response to acupuncture may be at least partially mediated by the vagus nerve. For example, it has been shown that the response to electroacupuncture is attenuated after vagotomy (Noguchi et al, Jpn. J. Physiol. 46(1): 53-58 (1996)). Mechanical stimulation may also include nerve stimulation using ultrasound as described, for example in Norton, BioMedical Engineering 2(1): 6 (2003). Stimulation of the vagus nerve using electromagnetic radiation includes applying infrared, visible or ultraviolet, heat or other energy source. The vagus nerve may also be stimulated by magnetic stimulation; a description of magnetic nerve stimulation is provided in Hsu et al, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50(11): 1276-85 (2003). The entire teachings of these publications are incorporated herein by reference.


The site of stimulation of the vagus nerve may be in the cervical region (in the neck) and a region peripheral and distal of the cervical region including, supra-diaphragmatical or sub-diaphragmatical regions. Peripheral, distal locations including branches of the vagus nerve that innervate the organs, including but not limited to, the spleen, the small intestine and the large intestine. The vagus nerve may also be stimulated endotracheally or transesophageally. Endotracheal or transesophageal vagal nerve stimulation may be accomplished using an endotracheal/esophageal nerve stimulator (described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,735,471, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). The vagus nerve can be stimulated transesophageally using one or more esophageal electrodes (described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,150). The vagus nerve can also be stimulated using a transcutaneous nerve stimulator (as described for example in U.S. Pat. No. 6,721,603, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) or a percutaneous nerve stimulator. In one embodiment, the vagus nerve is stimulated in the cervical region. In another embodiment, the vagus nerve is stimulated at a peripheral, distal location. In another embodiment, the vagus nerve is stimulated in the brain by the device.


According to one embodiment of the present invention, the vagus nerve is stimulated by delivering an electrical signal generated by any suitable vagus nerve stimulators. For example, a commercial vagus nerve stimulator such as the Cyberonics NCP™, or an electric probe can be used.


Examples of suitable vagus nerve stimulators are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,702,254; 5,154,172; 5,231,988; 5,330,507; 6,473,644; 6,721,603; 6,735,471; and U.S. Pat. App. Pub. 2004/0193231. The teachings of all of these publications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.


The vagus nerve can be stimulated by means of either an implanted device or a device worn external to the patient's body, such as Cyberonics NCP™ device described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,988 or a Medtronic™ device described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,330,507. Both patents describe apparati for stimulating the right or left vagus nerve with continuous and/or phasic electrical signal.


A schematic diagram of a typical electrical signal generator device suitable for practicing the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. Referring to FIG. 1, a typical signal generator 10 includes a battery (or set of batteries) 12, which may be of any type conventionally employed for powering medical electronic devices. Battery 12 is connected to a voltage regulator 14. Regulator 14 smoothes the battery output to produce steady output voltage as well as provides voltage multiplication or division if necessary.


Regulator 13 supplies power to signal controller 16. Signal controller 16 can includes a microprocessor. Signal controller 16 controls functions of the device such as output signal current or voltage, output signal frequency, output signal pulse width, output signal on-time, output signal off-time. Controller 16 can be programmed to control daily times for continuous or periodic modulation of vagal activity as well as output signal start delay time. Such programmability allows the output signal to be adjusted for the treatment regimen.


When device 10 is implanted, a built-in antenna (not shown) can be used to enables communication between device 10 and external programming or monitoring devices (not shown).


Signal controller 16 controls driver 18 which generates the desired electrical signal. The output signal is applied to the patient's body via electrodes 20a and 20b.


Analyzer 22 can be provided to process any relevant physiological parameters of a patient such as heart rate or blood pressure detected by detector 24.


As mentioned above, device 10 can be worn external to the patient's body or can be implanted. FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of the present invention where signal generator 10 is implanted in the patient's chest in a pocket formed by the surgeon just below the skin. One suitable location for the generator is in the patient's chest, as a pacemaker pulse generator would be implanted, with the electrodes 20a and 20b implanted in the patient's neck.


Electrodes 20a and 20b can be bipolar stimulating electrodes of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,481, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In this embodiment, electrodes form an assembly which is surgically implanted on the vagus nerve in the patient's neck. The two electrodes are wrapped around the vagus nerve, and the assembly is secured to the nerve by a spiral anchoring tether as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,979,511, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Structurally, the electrode assembly can comprise two ribbons of platinum which are individually bonded to each of the two spiral loops wrapped around the vagus nerve. Each loop further includes silicone rubber. An additional helical loop that includes silicon rubber is provided to tether the electrode assembly to the vagus nerve. The inner diameter of the helical bipolar electrodes may typically be about two millimeters (mm), and an individual spiral is about seven mm long (measured along the axis of the nerve).


Instead of implanting the electrode assembly in the patient's neck, the assembly may be implanted on the vagus nerve as it enervated any of the organs listed above. The implantation of electrodes 20a and 20b is accomplished in substantially the same manner as was described for the neck location.


The operation of signal generator 10 to control and treat inflammatory disorders will be described by reference to the signal waveform and parameters shown in FIG. 3. The latter is an idealized representation of the output signal delivered by driver 18. FIG. 3 serves to clarify terminology used to refer to the parameters of an electrical signal. Such parameters include signal on-time, signal off-time, signal frequency, signal pulse width, signal current, and signal voltage. Treatment of inflammatory disorders can be accomplished by applying voltage to electrodes 20a and 20b as well as by driving a current between electrodes 20a and 20b. While the pulses shown in FIG. 3 have positive voltage or current output, electrical signals having negative outputs can also be used.


Signal controller 16 controls the output signal by limiting the output to a suitable range of parameters specified above with reference to FIG. 3. A range of each parameter can be chosen independently from any other parameter. Alternatively, a combination of ranges for any number of parameters can be chosen. Preferred examples of specific values for the parameters and combinations of parameters as provided below with respect to the controller are also applicable to the disclosed methods of treatment.


Signal controller can limit signal voltage to a range from about 0.01 Volt to about 1 Volt, preferably to a range from about 0.01 Volt to about 0.1 Volt, more preferably, to a range from about 0.01 Volt to about 0.05 Volt.


Signal controller can limit signal current to a range from about 1 mA to about 100 mA, preferably to a range from about 1 mA to about 10 mA, more preferably to a range from about 1 mA to about 5 mA.


In some embodiments, both signal voltage and signal current are controlled.


In other embodiments, either in addition to or independently from controlling signal voltage, signal current or both, signal controller can further control one or more parameters selected from pulse width, on-time and frequency. Signal controller can limit the pulse width to a range from about 0.1 ms to about 5 ms, preferably to a range from about 0.1 ms to about 1 ms, more preferably to a range from about 0.1 ms to about 0.5 ms. Signal controller can limit signal on-time from about 1 second to about 120 seconds, preferably, to a range of from about 10 seconds to about 60 seconds, more preferably, to a range from about 20 seconds to about 40 seconds. Signal controller can limit signal frequency to a range from about 0.1 Hz to about 30 Hz, preferably, to a range from about 1 Hz to about 30 Hz, more preferably, to a range from about 10 Hz to about 30 Hz.


In other embodiments, either in addition to or independently from controlling signal voltage and/or signal current, as well as signal width, signal frequency and/or signal on-time, signal controller can further control signal off-time. In one embodiment, a subject can be treated with one pulse. In another embodiment, signal controller can limit signal off-time to a range of over 5 minutes, preferably, over 2 hours, more preferably, over 4 hours, even more preferably, over 8 hours, still more preferably, over 12 hours. In another embodiment, signal controller can limit signal off-time to a range of from about 2 hours to about 48 hours, preferably to a range from about 4 hours to about 36 hours, more preferably, to a range from about 6 hours to about 36 hours. In other preferred embodiments, signal controller can limit signal off-time to a range selected from: from about 6 to about 36 hours, from about 12 to about 36 hours, from about 16 to about 30 hours and from about 20 to about 28 hours. Alternatively, signal off-time can be undefined as one skilled in the art will readily determine the desired time interval between two consecutive signals.


As mentioned above, various parameters can be limited to the specified ranges alone or in combination. In one example, signal controller can limit a combination of parameters as follows: signal voltage to a range from about 0.01 Volt to about 1 Volt; pulse width to a range from about 0.1 ms to about 5 ms; signal frequency to a range from about 0.1 Hz to about 30 Hz; signal on-time from about 1 second to about 120 seconds. Signal off-time can be undefined. Alternatively, signal off-time can be limited to a range over about 5 minutes. In other preferred embodiments, signal controller can limit signal off-time to a range selected from: from about 6 to about 36 hours, from about 12 to about 36 hours, from about 16 to about 30 hours and from about 20 to about 28 hours.


In another example, signal controller can limit a combination of parameters as follows: signal current to a range from about 1 mA to about 100 mA; pulse width to a range from about 0.1 ms to about 5 ms; signal frequency to a range from about 0.1 Hz to about 30 Hz; signal on-time from about 1 second to about 120 seconds. Signal off-time can be undefined. Alternatively, signal off-time can be limited to a range over about 5 minutes. In other preferred embodiments, signal controller can limit signal off-time to a range selected from: from about 6 to about 36 hours, from about 12 to about 36 hours, from about 16 to about 30 hours and from about 20 to about 28 hours.


In a preferred embodiment, signal controller can limit a combination of parameters as follows: signal voltage to a range from about 0.01 Volt to about 0.1 Volt; pulse width to a range from about 0.1 ms to about 1 ms; signal frequency to a range from about 1 Hz to about 30 Hz; signal on-time to a range of from about 10 seconds to about 60 seconds; signal off-time to a range of over 2 hours. Alternatively, signal off-time can be undefined. In other preferred embodiments, signal controller can limit signal off-time to a range selected from: from about 6 to about 36 hours, from about 12 to about 36 hours, from about 16 to about 30 hours and from about 20 to about 28 hours.


Alternatively, signal controller can limit a combination of parameters as follows: signal current to a range from about 1 mA to about 10 mA; pulse width to a range from about 0.1 ms to about 1 ms; signal frequency to a range from about 1 Hz to about 30 Hz; signal on-time to a range of from about 10 seconds to about 60 seconds; signal off-time to a range of over 2 hours. Alternatively, signal off-time can be undefined. In other preferred embodiments, signal controller can limit signal off-time to a range selected from: from about 6 to about 36 hours, from about 12 to about 36 hours, from about 16 to about 30 hours and from about 20 to about 28 hours.


More preferably, signal controller can limit a combination of parameters as follows: signal voltage to a range from about 0.01 Volt to about 0.05 Volt; pulse width to a range from about 0.1 ms to about 0.5 ms; signal to a range from about 10 Hz to about 30 Hz; signal on-time to a range from about 20 seconds to about 40 seconds; signal off-time to a range of from about 2 hours to about 24 hours. Alternatively, signal off-time can be undefined. In other preferred embodiments, signal controller can limit signal off-time to a range selected from: from about 6 to about 36 hours, from about 12 to about 36 hours, from about 16 to about 30 hours and from about 20 to about 28 hours. In other preferred embodiments, signal controller can limit signal off-time to a range selected from: from about 6 to about 36 hours, from about 12 to about 36 hours, from about 16 to about 30 hours and from about 20 to about 28 hours.


Alternatively, signal controller can limit a combination of parameters as follows: signal current to a range from about 1 mA to about 5 mA; pulse width to a range from about 0.1 ms to about 0.5 ms; signal to a range from about 10 Hz to about 30 Hz; signal on-time to a range from about 20 seconds to about 40 seconds; signal off-time to a range of from about 2 hours to about 24 hours. Alternatively, signal off-time can be undefined. In other preferred embodiments, signal controller can limit signal off-time to a range selected from: from about 6 to about 36 hours, from about 12 to about 36 hours, from about 16 to about 30 hours and from about 20 to about 28 hours.


As used herein, “treatment” includes prophylactic and therapeutic treatment. “Prophylactic treatment” refers to treatment before onset of an inflammatory condition to prevent, inhibit or reduce its occurrence. Therapeutic treatment is treatment of a subject who is already experiencing an inflammatory disorder.


“Inflammatory disorders” are usually mediated by an inflammatory cytokine cascade, defined herein as an in vivo release from cells of at least one proinflammatory cytokine in a subject, wherein the cytokine release affects a physiological condition of the subject. Nonlimiting examples of cells that produce proinflammatory cytokines are monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, epithelial cells, osteoblasts, fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, and neurons.


As used herein, a “cytokine” is a soluble protein or peptide which is naturally produced by mammalian cells and which act in vivo as humoral regulators at micro- to picomolar concentrations. Cytokines can, either under normal or pathological conditions, modulate the functional activities of individual cells and tissues. A proinflammatory cytokine is a cytokine that is capable of causing any of the following physiological reactions associated with inflammation: vasodialation, hyperemia, increased permeability of vessels with associated edema, accumulation of granulocytes and mononuclear phagocytes, or deposition of fibrin. In some cases, the proinflammatory cytokine can also cause apoptosis, such as in chronic heart failure, where TNF has been shown to stimulate cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Nonlimiting examples of proinflammatory cytokines are tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1.beta., IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, interferon.gamma., HMG-1, platelet-activating factor (PAF), and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). In preferred embodiments of the invention, the proinflammatory cytokine that is inhibited by cholinergic agonist treatment is TNF, an IL-1, IL-6 or IL-18, because these cytokines are produced by macrophages and mediate deleterious conditions for many important disorders, for example endotoxic shock, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bile disease, heart failure, and allograft rejection. In most preferred embodiments, the proinflammatory cytokine is TNF.


Proinflammatory cytokines are to be distinguished from anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13, which are not mediators of inflammation. In preferred embodiments, release of anti-inflammatory cytokines is not inhibited by cholinergic agonists.


When referring to the effect of the vagus nerve stimulation on an inflammatory disorder, the use of the terms “treatment”, “inhibition”, “decrease” or “attenuation” encompasses at least a small but measurable reduction in the symptoms associated with the disorder being treated.


“Treatment” includes both therapeutic and prophylactic treatments.


The present invention is directed to the treatment of inflammatory disorders or conditions mediated by an inflammatory cytokine cascade. In one aspect, the disorder is not ileus, asthma or cystic fibrosis.


In another embodiment, the present invention is a method of treating ileus. As used herein, “ileus” means a short term cessation (less than one month, typically, less than 2 weeks, often less than 1 week) of function of bowels not caused by chronic condition such as gastric ulcer, gastroesophageal reflux, diabetic gastroparesis, postvagotomy, and postgastrectomy.


In one embodiment ileus is characterized by inflammation of intestinal smooth muscles.


The methods of the present invention can be used to treat ileus caused by manipulation of the bowels during abdominal surgery (“post-operative ileus”), or administration of narcotics or chemotherapeutic agents such as during cancer chemotherapy. Successful treatment of ileus includes reduction and alleviation of symptoms of ileus. The terms “reduction” or “alleviation”, when referring to symptoms of ileus in a subject, encompass reduction in measurable indicia over non-treated controls. Such measurable indicia include, but are not limited to retention time of gastric content after gavage and myeloperoxidase activity (units per gram) in the gastrointestinal musculature. In preferred embodiments, the measurable indicia are reduced by at least 20% over non-treated controls; in more preferred embodiments, the reduction is at least 70%; and in still more preferred embodiments, the reduction is at least 80%. In a most preferred embodiment, the symptoms of ileus are substantially eliminated.


In one embodiment, the ileus to be treated is a post-operative ileus, i.e. ileus that occurs after abdominal surgery.


With respect to ileus, “treatment” includes pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative treatment of ileus. Thus, “treatment” means prophylactic treatment of subjects at risk for ileus, for example, a subject undergoing abdominal surgery, experiencing abdominal surgery, or being administered narcotics or chemotherapeutic agents. With respect to ileus, “prophylactic treatment” refers to treatment before onset of ileus to prevent, inhibit or reduce the occurrence of ileus. For example, a subject at risk for ileus, such as a subject undergoing abdominal surgery, or about to undergo abdominal surgery, or being (or about to be) administered narcotics or chemotherapeutic agents can be prophylactically treated according to the method of the present invention prior to the anticipated onset of ileus. For example, a subject about to undergo surgery can be treated up to eight days before surgery, up to seven days before surgery, up to six days before surgery, up to five days before surgery, up to four days before surgery, up to three days before surgery, 48 hours prior to surgery, up to 36 hours prior to surgery, up to 24 hours prior to surgery, up to 12 hours prior to surgery, up to 6 hours before surgery, up to 3 hours before surgery, up to 2 hours before surgery, up to one hour before surgery and up to the onset of surgery. In another example, a subject can be treated during the surgery or administration of narcotics or chemotherapeutic agents. In another embodiment, the subject can be treated after the completion of surgery of administration of narcotics or chemotherapeutic agents. For example, a subject can be treated immediately after surgery, up to one hour after surgery, up to 2 hours after surgery, up to 3 hours after surgery, up to 6 hours after surgery, up to 12 hours after, up to 24 hours after, up to 36 hours after, up to 48 hours after surgery, up to three days after surgery, up to four days after surgery, up to five days after surgery, up to six days after surgery, up to seven days after surgery or up to eight days after surgery. “Treatment” of ileus also includes therapeutic treatment, where the subject is already experiencing ileus.


In one example, the subject can be treated pre-operatively, post-operatively, or peri-operatively once, twice, three times, four times or more than four times during the intervals described above. Alternatively, the subject can be treated by any combination of pre-operative, post-operative or peri-operative regimens during the intervals described above.


Preferably, ileus is treated by stimulating the vagus nerve endotracheally or transesophageally. Any device capable of performing this function can be employed to practice the present invention. An example of an endotracheal/esophageal nerve stimulator is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,735,471, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


In another aspect, the invention is the use of any of the devices described above in the manufacture of a therapeutic article for treating inflammatory disorders in a subject, wherein the device, in operation directly, stimulates the vagus nerve to treat inflammatory disorders. The term “in operation” is intended to mean the device during use or application of the device on, to, or near the subject to directly stimulate the vagus nerve to treat inflammatory disorders.


In a further aspect, the invention relates to the use of a device in the manufacture of a therapeutic article for treating inflammatory disorders in a subject, wherein the device is used solely to stimulate the vagus nerve for the purpose of treating inflammatory disorders. The term “solely” includes the use of the device to selectively treat inflammatory disorders where other diseases or conditions could potentially be treated by stimulation of the vagus nerve.


It is preferred that no medical condition other than an inflammatory disorder is treatable by the direct stimulation of the vagus nerve by the device. In one embodiment, the device may be adapted specifically to treat only inflammatory disorders by direct stimulation of the vagus nerve.


The condition can be one where the inflammatory cytokine cascade causes a systemic reaction, such as with septic shock. Alternatively, the condition can be mediated by a localized inflammatory cytokine cascade, as in rheumatoid arthritis.


Nonlimiting examples of conditions which can be usefully treated using the present invention include ileus, appendicitis, peptic ulcer, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, peritonitis, pancreatitis, ulcerative colitis, pseudomembranous colitis, acute colitis, ischemic colitis, diverticulitis, epiglottitis, achalasia, cholangitis, cholecystitits, hepatitis, Crohn's disease, enteritis, Whipple's disease, allergy, anaphylactic shock, immune complex disease, organ ischemia, reperfusion injury, organ necrosis, hay fever, sepsis, septicemia, endotoxic shock, cachexia, hyperpyrexia, eosinophilic granuloma, granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, septic abortion, epididymitis, vaginitis, prostatitis, urethritis, bronchitis, emphysema, rhinitis, pneumonitits, pneumoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis, alvealitis, bronchiolitis, pharyngitis, pleurisy, sinusitis, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus infection, HIV infection, hepatitis B virus infection, hepatitis C virus infection, herpes virus infection disseminated bacteremia, Dengue fever, candidiasis, malaria, filariasis, amebiasis, hydatid cysts, burns, dermatitis, dermatomyositis, sunburn, urticaria, warts, wheals, vasulitis, angiitis, endocarditis, arteritis, atherosclerosis, thrombophlebitis, pericarditis, myocarditis, myocardial ischemia, periarteritis nodosa, rheumatic fever, Alzheimer's disease, coeliac disease, congestive heart failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, meningitis, encephalitis, multiple sclerosis, cerebral infarction, cerebral embolism, Guillame-Barre syndrome, neuritis, neuralgia, spinal cord injury, paralysis, uveitis, arthritides, arthralgias, osteomyelitis, fasciitis, Paget's disease, gout, periodontal disease, rheumatoid arthritis, synovitis, myasthenia gravis, thyroiditis, systemic lupus erythematosis, Goodpasture's syndrome, Behcet's syndrome, allograft rejection, graft-versus-host disease, Type I diabetes, ankylosing spondylitis, Berger's disease, Reiter's syndrome and Hodgkin's disease.


In another embodiment, the examples of conditions which can be usefully treated using the present invention include appendicitis, peptic ulcer, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, peritonitis, pancreatitis, ulcerative colitis, pseudomembranous colitis, acute colitis, ischemic colitis, diverticulitis, epiglottitis, achalasia, cholangitis, cholecystitits, hepatitis, Crohn's disease, enteritis, Whipple's disease, allergy, anaphylactic shock, immune complex disease, organ ischemia, reperfusion injury, organ necrosis, hay fever, sepsis, septicemia, endotoxic shock, cachexia, hyperpyrexia, eosinophilic granuloma, granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, septic abortion, epididymitis, vaginitis, prostatitis, urethritis, bronchitis, emphysema, rhinitis, pneumonitits, pneumoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis, alvealitis, bronchiolitis, pharyngitis, pleurisy, sinusitis, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus infection, HIV infection, hepatitis B virus infection, hepatitis C virus infection, herpes virus infection disseminated bacteremia, Dengue fever, candidiasis, malaria, filariasis, amebiasis, hydatid cysts, burns, dermatitis, dermatomyositis, sunburn, urticaria, warts, wheals, vasulitis, angiitis, endocarditis, arteritis, atherosclerosis, thrombophlebitis, pericarditis, myocarditis, myocardial ischemia, periarteritis nodosa, rheumatic fever, Alzheimer's disease, coeliac disease, congestive heart failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, meningitis, encephalitis, multiple sclerosis, cerebral infarction, cerebral embolism, Guillame-Barre syndrome, neuritis, neuralgia, spinal cord injury, paralysis, uveitis, arthritides, arthralgias, osteomyelitis, fasciitis, Paget's disease, gout, periodontal disease, rheumatoid arthritis, synovitis, myasthenia gravis, thyroiditis, systemic lupus erythematosis, Goodpasture's syndrome, Behcet's syndrome, allograft rejection, graft-versus-host disease, Type I diabetes, ankylosing spondylitis, Berger's disease, Reiter's syndrome and Hodgkin's disease.


In more preferred embodiments, the condition is ileus, appendicitis, peptic, gastric or duodenal ulcers, peritonitis, pancreatitis, ulcerative, pseudomembranous, acute or ischemic colitis, hepatitis, Crohn's disease, asthma, allergy, anaphylactic shock, organ ischemia, reperfusion injury, organ necrosis, hay fever, sepsis, septicemia, endotoxic shock, cachexia, septic abortion, disseminated bacteremia, burns, Alzheimer's disease, coeliac disease, congestive heart failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, cerebral infarction, cerebral embolism, spinal cord injury, paralysis, allograft rejection or graft-versus-host disease. In more preferred embodiments, the condition is endotoxic shock.


In another embodiment, the condition is appendicitis, peptic, gastric or duodenal ulcers, peritonitis, pancreatitis, ulcerative, pseudomembranous, acute or ischemic colitis, hepatitis, Crohn's disease, asthma, allergy, anaphylactic shock, organ ischemia, reperfusion injury, organ necrosis, hay fever, sepsis, septicemia, endotoxic shock, cachexia, septic abortion, disseminated bacteremia, burns, Alzheimer's disease, coeliac disease, congestive heart failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, cerebral infarction, cerebral embolism, spinal cord injury, paralysis, allograft rejection or graft-versus-host disease.


In another preferred embodiment, the conditions are ileus, sepsis, endotoxic shock, allograft rejection, rheumatoid arthritis, adult respiratory distress syndrome, asthma, systemic lupus erythematosis, pancreatitis, peritonitis, burns, myocardial ischemia, allograft rejection, graft-versus-host disease, congestive heart failure, organ ischemia, reperfusion injury, cachexia and cystic fibrosis.


In another embodiment, the conditions are sepsis, endotoxic shock, allograft rejection, rheumatoid arthritis, adult respiratory distress syndrome, asthma, systemic lupus erythematosis, pancreatitis, peritonitis, burns, myocardial ischemia, allograft rejection, graft-versus-host disease, congestive heart failure, organ ischemia, reperfusion injury, cachexia and cystic fibrosis.


In another preferred embodiment, the conditions are ileus, appendicitis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, allergy, reperfusion injury, systemic lupus erythematosus, hepatitis, Behcet's syndrome, multiple sclerosis and atherosclerosis.


In another embodiment, the conditions are appendicitis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, allergy, reperfusion injury, systemic lupus erythematosus, hepatitis, Behcet's syndrome, multiple sclerosis and atherosclerosis.


In another preferred embodiment, the conditions are ileus, endotoxic shock and sepsis.


In another preferred embodiment, the conditions are endotoxic shock and sepsis.


In another embodiment, the present invention is use of an electrical signal generator for construction of a medical device for treating a subject suffering from, or at risk for ileus. In yet another embodiment, the present invention is directed to the use of an electrical signal generator for construction of a medical device for treating a subject suffering from, or at risk for post-operative ileus. The device comprises an electrode assembly for delivering an electrical signal to the vagus nerve of the subject; and a controller controlling the electrical signal by limiting the signal voltage to a range from 0.01 Volt to 1 Volt. Preferably, the controller is limiting the signal voltage to a range from 0.01 Volt to 0.05 Volt. In another embodiment, the controller is limiting pulse width to a range from 0.1 ms to 5 ms; signal frequency to a range from 0.1 Hz to 30 Hz; and signal on-time to a range from 1 second to 120 seconds. In yet another embodiment, the controller is limiting signal voltage to a range from 0.01 Volt to 0.05 Volt; pulse width to a range from 0.1 ms to 0.5 ms; signal frequency to a range from 10 Hz to 30 Hz; and signal on-time to a range from 20 seconds to 40 seconds.


In another embodiment, the present invention is use of an electrical signal generator for construction of a medical device for treating a subject suffering from, or at risk for ileus. The device comprises an electrode assembly for delivering an electrical signal to the vagus nerve of the subject; and a controller controlling the electrical signal by limiting the signal voltage to a range from 0.01 Volt to 1 Volt, pulse width to a range from 0.1 ms to 5 ms; signal frequency to a range from 0.1 Hz to 30 Hz; signal on-time to a range from 1 second to 120 seconds; and signal off-time to a range over 2 hours.


Preferably, the use of claim 79, the controller limiting the signal off-time to a range from 2 hours to 24 hours. In another embodiment, the device, in operation, directly stimulates the vagus nerve to treat ileus. In another embodiment, the device is used solely to stimulate the vagus nerve for the purpose of treating ileus.


The invention is illustrated by the following examples which are not intended to be limiting in any way.


EXEMPLIFICATION
Example 1 Electrical Vagus Nerve Stimulation Using Decreased Stimulation Intensities and Durations are Sufficient for Activation of the Cholinergic Anti-Inflammatory Pathway

To determine whether decreased stimulation parameters could achieve anti-inflammatory effects, intact vagus nerves were electrically stimulated at progressively lower stimulation intensities and durations in the setting of lethal endotoxemia. Male 8- to 12-week-old BALB/c mice (25-30 g; Taconic) were housed at 25° C. on a 12 hour light/dark cycle. Animals were allowed to acclimate to the facility for at least 7 days prior to experimental manipulation. Standard mouse chow and water were freely available. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guidelines under protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the North Shore-Long Island Jewish Research Institute.


Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (1.5-2.0%) and placed supine on the operating table. A ventral cervical midline incision was used to expose and isolate the left cervical vagus nerve. For electrical stimulation, the intact vagus nerve was placed across bipolar platinum electrodes (Plastics One) connected to a stimulation module (STM100C, Biopac Systems) and controlled by an acquisition system (MP150, Biopac Systems). Electrical stimulation parameters were programmed using AcqKnowledge software (Biopac Systems). Stimulation parameters included (100 mA, 2 ms, 5 Hz) for 20 min (10 min before LPS administration and 10 min after), (100 mA, 2 ms, 5 Hz) for 2 min (1 min before LPS administration and 1 min after), (100 mA, 2 ms, 5 Hz) for 30 sec (5 min after LPS administration), and (1 mA, 0.5 ms, 30 Hz) for 30 sec (5 min after LPS administration). Sham operated electrical VNS mice underwent cervical incision followed by dissection of the underlying submandibular salivary glands only. The vagus nerve was neither exposed nor isolated.


Mice were injected with endotoxin (Escherichia coli LPS 0111:B4; Sigma) that was dissolved in sterile, pyrogen-free saline at stock concentrations of 1 mg/ml. LPS solutions were sonicated for 30 min immediately before use for each experiment. Mice received an LD50 dose of LPS (7.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Blood was collected 2 h after LPS administration, allowed to clot for 2 h at room temperature, and then centrifuged for 15 min at 2,000×g. Serum samples were stored at −20° C. before analysis. TNF concentrations in mouse serum were measured by ELISA (R & D Systems).


As shown in FIG. 5, all four stimulation parameters were sufficient for TNF suppression. The control mice group who received LPS followed by sham VNS had a mean serum TNF level of 2755±424 pg/ml. Serum TNF levels in the electrical VNS groups were as follows; 20 min (712±128 pg/ml, 25.8% of control, p=0.02), 2 min (688±114 pg/ml, 25.0% of control, p=0.02), 30 sec at 100 mA (821±378 pg/ml, 29.8% of control, p=0.46), and 30 sec at 1 mA (767±144 pg/ml, 27.8% of control, p=0.03). The 30 sec 1 mA group corresponds to a clinically approved stimulation protocol (REF).


These results indicate that cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway activation is responsive to physiologic, clinically well-tolerated electrical stimulation parameters. Additionally, the application of supraphysiologic current doses or prolonged stimulation durations does not provide any additional benefits in terms of reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production.


Example 2 The Effective Half-Life of Electrical Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Mediated TNF Suppression is Between Two and Three Days

To determine how long the anti-inflammatory effects of vagus nerve stimulation last after the completion of stimulation, mice underwent electrical stimulation for 30 sec (1 mA, 0.5 ms, 30 Hz), and were allowed to recover for defined time periods prior to LPS administration. Control mice underwent sham surgery at time 0 and were challenged with LPS at the identical time periods as stimulated mice. Results for the four experimental groups are depicted in FIG. 5. Waiting for two hours between VNS and subsequent lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration resulted in a 71% suppression of TNF (control=1606±326 pg/ml vs. VNS=474±157 pg/ml, p=0.01). Waiting for one day between VNS and LPS administration resulted in a 72% suppression of TNF (control=2813±503 pg/ml vs. VNS=783±87 pg/ml, p=0.004). Waiting two days between VNS and LPS resulted in a 44% suppression of TNF (control=1590±351 pg/ml vs. VNS=892±85 pg/ml, p=0.09). Finally, waiting for three days resulted in no TNF suppression (control=1253±202 pg/ml vs. VNS=1393±263 pg/ml, p=0.7). Animals were euthanized two hours after LPS administration.


These results indicate that the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway's effects are very long lasting, persisting for at least two days after stimulation. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the anti-inflammatory effects between the two hour delay as opposed to a one day delay prior to LPS challenge. Finally, the data indicate that the anti-inflammatory effects of vagus nerve stimulation are abolished three days after stimulation.


Example 3 Electrical Vagus Nerve Stimulation Improves Severity of Arthritis in a Rat Model of Collagen-Induced Arthritis

To determine if vagus nerve stimulation could ameliorate the severity of arthritis in a rat collagen-induced arthritis model, rats received repeated vagus nerve stimulation via implanted electrodes for several days after collagen immunization and were scored for arthritis severity.


Purified Rat Type II Collagen (CII) (Chondrex, Redmond, Wash., USA) was dissolved in 0.01M acetic acid. Equal volumes of collagen solution and incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) were emulsified at 4° C. so that 200 ul of emulsion contains 150 ug of rat CII (Åkerlund et al, Clinical & Experimental Immunology 1999 115: 32-41; Kokkola R et al., Arthritis Rheum. 2003 48:2052-8.). Rats were immunized intradermally at the base of the tail with a volume of 200 ul per animal. A chronic, destructive arthritis developed with a mean onset of 14 days after immunization.


A previously described arthritis clinical scoring system was utilized (Kokkola R et al., Arthritis Rheum 2003. 48(7): 2052-2058). This scoring system has proven reliable and highly discriminative for therapeutic studies (Åkerlund et al, Clin Exp Immunol 1999, 115:32-41). Rats were observed daily for clinical signs of arthritis, including erythema and swelling of the joints. The interphalangeal joints of the digits, the metacarpophalangeal joint and wrist in the forepaw, and the metatarsophalangeal joint and ankle joint in the hind paw are each considered as one category of joint. Each paw was scored on a scale of 0-4 as follows: 0=unaffected, 1=1 type of joint affected, 2=2 types of joints affected, 3=3 types of joints affected, 4=3 types of joints affected and maximal erythema and swelling. An arthritis index was calculated for each rat and expressed as the cumulative score for all paws, with a maximum possible score of 16. Two independent observers performed all arthritis evaluations. The observers were additionally blinded to the identity of the animals.


Electrical vagus nerve stimulation was started on the 13th day post collagen immunization day (PCID). VNS rats were stimulated for 10 min once a day (5 V, 1-2 mA; 0.5 msec pulse; 30 Hz; 10 min on-time of alternating 30 seconds “on” and 300 seconds “off”) through day 20 (day 16 was skipped). These stimuli were generated using the STMISOC stimulation adapter, STM100C stimulator module, and MP150 Data Acquisition System, all from Biopac Systems, Inc. Where indicated, all animals were anesthetized using isoflurane inhalation gas (2-4%). During surgical procedures, animals were placed on a maintenance anesthesia dose via a mask delivery system. Following isoflurane anesthesia induction, animal were placed in supine position, and a 2 cm ventral midline cervical incision was made between the mandible and sternum. The subcutaneous tissue was dissected and retracted laterally. The mandibular salivary glands were bluntly separated and retracted laterally. The left vagus nerve was isolated between the sternomastoid and sternohyoid muscles, dissected free from the neighboring carotid artery, and controlled with a 4-0 silk suture. A Teflon-coated silver electrode 0.003 inch in diameter was secured to the vagus nerve by multiple 360 degree circular wrappings around the nerve. The Teflon only was stripped from the ends of the wire to minimize electrical stimulation of the surrounding cervical muscles. The silver wire ends then were tunneled subcutaneously around the left neck to the dorsal cervical midline. At this point, they were exited through the skin and be attached to stimulating wires traveling through the tether apparatus.


As shown in FIG. 6, repeated electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve resulted in decreased clinical signs of arthritis (as measured by erythema and swelling of the joints) as compared with control and sham animals (stimulated rats: N=4; sham: N=5; control: N=3.) On day 16, the arthritis score in rats receiving vagus nerve stimulation was significantly less than that in control and sham animals (p<0.05). On day 19, the arthritis score in rats receiving vagus nerve stimulation was significantly less than that in sham treated animals (p<0.05). These results indicate that repeated vagus nerve stimulation is effective at lessening arthritis severity in collagen-induced arthritis.


While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for treating inflammation in a subject suffering from an inflammatory disorder, the method comprising stimulating, in the subject suffering from inflammation, the subject's vagus nerve with an electrical signal to achieve an anti-inflammatory effect for treating the inflammation, wherein the signal current is from 1 mA to 100 mA, provided that the condition is not ileus, asthma or cystic fibrosis; and re-stimulating the vagus nerve after waiting for more than 24 hours and prior to the anti-inflammatory effect being abolished, wherein the anti-inflammatory effect for treating the inflammation persists for at least 24 hours after stimulation has ended.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the inflammatory disorder is selected from the group consisting of appendicitis, peptic ulcer, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, peritonitis, pancreatitis, ulcerative colitis, pseudomembranous colitis, acute colitis, ischemic colitis, diverticulitis, epiglottitis, achalasia, cholangitis, cholecystitits, hepatitis, Crohn's disease, enteritis, Whipple's disease, allergy, anaphylactic shock, immune complex disease, organ ischemia, reperfusion injury, organ necrosis, hay fever, sepsis, septicemia, endotoxic shock, cachexia, hyperpyrexia, eosinophilic granuloma, granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, septic abortion, epididymitis, vaginitis, prostatitis, urethritis, bronchitis, emphysema, rhinitis, pneumonitis, pneumotransmicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis, alvealitis, bronchiolitis, pharyngitis, pleurisy, sinusitis, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus infection, HIV infection, hepatitis B virus infection, hepatitis C virus infection, disseminated bacteremia, Dengue fever, candidiasis, malaria, filariasis, amebiasis, hydatid cysts, burns, dermatitis, dermatomyositis, sunburn, urticaria, warts, wheals, vasulitis, angiitis, endocarditis, arteritis, atherosclerosis, thrombophlebitis, pericarditis, myocarditis, myocardial ischemia, periarteritis nodosa, rheumatic fever, Alzheimer's disease, coeliac disease, congestive heart failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, meningitis, encephalitis, multiple sclerosis, cerebral infarction, cerebral embolism, Guillame-Barre syndrome, neuritis, neuralgia, spinal cord injury, paralysis, uveitis, arthritides, arthralgias, osteomyelitis, fasciitis, Paget's disease, gout, periodontal disease, rheumatoid arthritis, synovitis, myasthenia gravis, thyroiditis, systemic lupus erythematosis, Goodpasture's syndrome, Behcet's syndrome, allograft rejection, graft-versus-host disease, Type I diabetes, ankylosing spondylitis, Berger's disease, Reiter's syndrome and Hodgkin's disease.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the condition is selected from sepsis, endotoxic shock, allograft rejection, rheumatoid arthritis, adult respiratory distress syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosis, pancreatitis, peritonitis, burns, myocardial ischemia, allograft rejection, graft-versus-host disease, congestive heart failure, organ ischemia, reperfusion injury and cachexia.
  • 4. The method of claim 2 wherein the condition is selected from appendicitis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, allergy, reperfusion injury, systemic lupus erythematosus, hepatitis, Behcet's syndrome, multiple sclerosis and atherosclerosis.
  • 5. The method of claim 2 wherein said vagus nerve activity is stimulated at a peripheral distal location.
  • 6. The method of claim 2 wherein said vagus nerve activity is stimulated in the cervical region.
  • 7. The method of claim 2 wherein ganglions or post-ganglionic neurons are stimulated.
  • 8. The method of claim 2 wherein the efferent vagus nerve is stimulated.
  • 9. The method of claim 2 wherein the afferent vagus nerve is stimulated.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the signal current is from 1 mA to 10 mA.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 wherein pulse width is from 0.1 ms to 5 ms; signal frequency is from 0.1 Hz to 30 Hz; and signal on-time is from 1 second to 120 seconds.
  • 12. The method of claim 1 wherein signal current is from 1 mA to 5 mA; pulse width is from 0.1 ms to 0.5 ms; signal frequency is from 10 Hz to 30 Hz; and signal on-time is from 20 seconds to 40 seconds.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the signal applied to the vagus nerve is stimulated for a signal on time that is between 1 second and 120 seconds.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining the level of a pro-inflammatory cytokine prior to stimulation.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the signal current is between 1 mA to 5 mA.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the anti-inflammatory effect is abolished by 72 hours after stimulation has ended.
  • 17. A method for treating inflammation in a subject suffering from an inflammatory disorder, the method comprising stimulating, in the subject suffering from inflammation, the subject's vagus nerve with an electrical signal to achieve an anti-inflammatory effect for treating the inflammation, wherein the signal current is between 1 mA and 100 mA, the pulse width is between 0.1 ms and 5 ms, the signal frequency is from 0.1 Hz to 30 Hz, and the signal on-time is from 1 second to 120 seconds, provided that the condition is not ileus, asthma or cystic fibrosis; further comprising re-stimulating the vagus nerve after waiting greater than 24 hours and prior to the anti-inflammatory effect being abolished, wherein the anti-inflammatory effect for treating the inflammation persists for at least 24 hours after stimulation has ended.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, further comprising determining the level of a pro-inflammatory cytokine prior to stimulation.
  • 19. A method for treating inflammation in a subject suffering from an inflammatory disorder, the method comprising stimulating, in a subject suffering from inflammation, the subject's vagus nerve with an electrical signal to achieve an anti-inflammatory effect for treating the inflammation, wherein the signal current is between 1 mA and 100 mA applied to the vagus nerve for a signal on-time that is between 1 second and 120 seconds; further comprising re-stimulating the vagus nerve after 24 hours after the electrical signal has ended and prior to the anti-inflammatory effect being abolished, wherein the anti-inflammatory effect for treating the inflammation persists for up to three days before restimulation, provided that the condition is not ileus, asthma or cystic fibrosis.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/639,332, filed on Dec. 27, 2004. The entire teachings of the above application are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (507)
Number Name Date Kind
2164121 Pescador Jun 1939 A
3363623 Atwell Jan 1968 A
3631534 Hirota et al. Dec 1971 A
4073296 McCall Feb 1978 A
4098277 Mendell Jul 1978 A
4305402 Katims Dec 1981 A
4503863 Katims Mar 1985 A
4573481 Bullara Mar 1986 A
4590946 Loeb May 1986 A
4632095 Libin Dec 1986 A
4649936 Ungar et al. Mar 1987 A
4702254 Zabara Oct 1987 A
4840793 Todd, III et al. Jun 1989 A
4867164 Zabara Sep 1989 A
4929734 Coughenour et al. May 1990 A
4930516 Alfano et al. Jun 1990 A
4935234 Todd, III et al. Jun 1990 A
4979511 Terry, Jr. Dec 1990 A
4991578 Cohen Feb 1991 A
5019648 Schlossman et al. May 1991 A
5025807 Zabara Jun 1991 A
5038781 Lynch Aug 1991 A
5049659 Cantor et al. Sep 1991 A
5073560 Wu et al. Dec 1991 A
5106853 Showell et al. Apr 1992 A
5111815 Mower May 1992 A
5154172 Terry, Jr. et al. Oct 1992 A
5175166 Dunbar et al. Dec 1992 A
5179950 Stanislaw Jan 1993 A
5186170 Varrichio et al. Feb 1993 A
5188104 Wernicke et al. Feb 1993 A
5203326 Collins Apr 1993 A
5205285 Baker, Jr. Apr 1993 A
5215086 Terry, Jr. et al. Jun 1993 A
5215089 Baker, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5222494 Baker, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5231988 Wernicke et al. Aug 1993 A
5235980 Varrichio et al. Aug 1993 A
5237991 Baker et al. Aug 1993 A
5251634 Weinberg Oct 1993 A
5263480 Wernicke et al. Nov 1993 A
5269303 Wernicke et al. Dec 1993 A
5299569 Wernicke et al. Apr 1994 A
5304206 Baker, Jr. et al. Apr 1994 A
5330507 Schwartz Jul 1994 A
5330515 Rutecki et al. Jul 1994 A
5335657 Terry, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5344438 Testerman Sep 1994 A
5351394 Weinberg Oct 1994 A
5403845 Dunbar et al. Apr 1995 A
5458625 Kendall Oct 1995 A
5472841 Jayasena et al. Dec 1995 A
5487756 Kallesoe et al. Jan 1996 A
5496938 Gold et al. Mar 1996 A
5503978 Schneider et al. Apr 1996 A
5531778 Maschino et al. Jul 1996 A
5540730 Terry, Jr. et al. Jul 1996 A
5540734 Zabara Jul 1996 A
5567588 Gold et al. Oct 1996 A
5567724 Kelleher et al. Oct 1996 A
5571150 Wernicke et al. Nov 1996 A
5580737 Polisky et al. Dec 1996 A
5582981 Toole et al. Dec 1996 A
5604231 Smith et al. Feb 1997 A
5607459 Paul et al. Mar 1997 A
5611350 John Mar 1997 A
5618818 Ojo et al. Apr 1997 A
5629285 Black et al. May 1997 A
5637459 Burke et al. Jun 1997 A
5651378 Matheny et al. Jul 1997 A
5654151 Allen et al. Aug 1997 A
5683867 Biesecker et al. Nov 1997 A
5690681 Geddes et al. Nov 1997 A
5700282 Zabara Dec 1997 A
5705337 Gold et al. Jan 1998 A
5707400 Terry, Jr. et al. Jan 1998 A
5709853 Lino et al. Jan 1998 A
5712375 Jensen et al. Jan 1998 A
5718912 Thompson et al. Feb 1998 A
5726017 Lochrie et al. Mar 1998 A
5726179 Messer, Jr. et al. Mar 1998 A
5727556 Weth et al. Mar 1998 A
5733255 Dinh et al. Mar 1998 A
5741802 Kem et al. Apr 1998 A
5773598 Burke et al. Jun 1998 A
5786462 Schneider et al. Jul 1998 A
5788656 Mino Aug 1998 A
5792210 Wamubu et al. Aug 1998 A
5824027 Hoffer et al. Oct 1998 A
5853005 Scanlon Dec 1998 A
5854289 Bianchi et al. Dec 1998 A
5902814 Gordon et al. May 1999 A
5913876 Taylor et al. Jun 1999 A
5916239 Geddes et al. Jun 1999 A
5919216 Houben et al. Jul 1999 A
5928272 Adkins et al. Jul 1999 A
5964794 Bolz et al. Oct 1999 A
5977144 Meyer et al. Nov 1999 A
5994330 El Khoury Nov 1999 A
6002964 Feler et al. Dec 1999 A
6006134 Hill et al. Dec 1999 A
6017891 Eibl et al. Jan 2000 A
6028186 Tasset et al. Feb 2000 A
6051017 Loeb et al. Apr 2000 A
6083696 Biesecker et al. Jul 2000 A
6083905 Voorberg et al. Jul 2000 A
6096728 Collins et al. Aug 2000 A
6104956 Naritoku et al. Aug 2000 A
6110900 Gold et al. Aug 2000 A
6110914 Phillips et al. Aug 2000 A
6117837 Tracey et al. Sep 2000 A
6124449 Gold et al. Sep 2000 A
6127119 Stephens et al. Oct 2000 A
6140490 Biesecker et al. Oct 2000 A
6141590 Renirie et al. Oct 2000 A
6147204 Gold et al. Nov 2000 A
6159145 Satoh Dec 2000 A
6164284 Schulman et al. Dec 2000 A
6166048 Bencherif Dec 2000 A
6168778 Janjic et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171795 Korman et al. Jan 2001 B1
6205359 Boveja Mar 2001 B1
6208894 Schulman et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208902 Boveja Mar 2001 B1
6210321 Di Mino et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224862 Turecek et al. May 2001 B1
6233488 Hess May 2001 B1
6266564 Hill et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269270 Boveja Jul 2001 B1
6304775 Iasemidis et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308104 Taylor et al. Oct 2001 B1
6337997 Rise Jan 2002 B1
6339725 Naritoku et al. Jan 2002 B1
6341236 Osorio et al. Jan 2002 B1
6356787 Rezai et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356788 Boveja Mar 2002 B2
6381499 Taylor et al. Apr 2002 B1
6405732 Edwards et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407095 Lochead et al. Jun 2002 B1
6428484 Battmer et al. Aug 2002 B1
6429217 Puskas Aug 2002 B1
6447443 Keogh et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449507 Hill et al. Sep 2002 B1
6473644 Terry et al. Oct 2002 B1
6479523 Puskas Nov 2002 B1
6487446 Hill et al. Nov 2002 B1
6511500 Rahme Jan 2003 B1
6528529 Brann et al. Mar 2003 B1
6532388 Hill et al. Mar 2003 B1
6542774 Hill et al. Apr 2003 B2
6556868 Naritoku et al. Apr 2003 B2
6564102 Boveja May 2003 B1
6587719 Barrett et al. Jul 2003 B1
6587727 Osorio et al. Jul 2003 B2
6600956 Maschino et al. Jul 2003 B2
6602891 Messer et al. Aug 2003 B2
6609025 Barrett et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610713 Tracey Aug 2003 B2
6611715 Boveja Aug 2003 B1
6615081 Boveja Sep 2003 B1
6615085 Boveja Sep 2003 B1
6622038 Barrett et al. Sep 2003 B2
6622041 Terry, Jr. et al. Sep 2003 B2
6628987 Hill et al. Sep 2003 B1
6633779 Schuler et al. Oct 2003 B1
6656960 Puskas Dec 2003 B2
6668191 Boveja Dec 2003 B1
6671556 Osorio et al. Dec 2003 B2
6684105 Cohen et al. Jan 2004 B2
6690973 Hill et al. Feb 2004 B2
6718208 Hill et al. Apr 2004 B2
6721603 Zabara et al. Apr 2004 B2
6735471 Hill et al. May 2004 B2
6735475 Whitehurst et al. May 2004 B1
6760626 Boveja Jul 2004 B1
6778854 Puskas Aug 2004 B2
6804558 Haller et al. Oct 2004 B2
RE38654 Hill et al. Nov 2004 E
6826428 Chen et al. Nov 2004 B1
6832114 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2004 B1
6838471 Tracey Jan 2005 B2
RE38705 Hill et al. Feb 2005 E
6879859 Boveja Apr 2005 B1
6885888 Rezai Apr 2005 B2
6901294 Whitehurst et al. May 2005 B1
6904318 Hill et al. Jun 2005 B2
6920357 Osorio et al. Jul 2005 B2
6928320 King Aug 2005 B2
6934583 Weinberg et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937903 Schuler et al. Aug 2005 B2
6961618 Osorio et al. Nov 2005 B2
6978787 Broniatowski Dec 2005 B1
7011638 Schuler et al. Mar 2006 B2
7054686 MacDonald May 2006 B2
7054692 Whitehurst et al. May 2006 B1
7058447 Hill et al. Jun 2006 B2
7062320 Ehlinger, Jr. Jun 2006 B2
7069082 Lindenthaler Jun 2006 B2
7072720 Puskas Jul 2006 B2
7076307 Boveja et al. Jul 2006 B2
7142910 Puskas Nov 2006 B2
7142917 Fukui Nov 2006 B2
7149574 Yun et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155279 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155284 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2006 B1
7167750 Knudson Jan 2007 B2
7167751 Whitehurst et al. Jan 2007 B1
7174218 Kuzma Feb 2007 B1
7184828 Hill et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184829 Hill et al. Feb 2007 B2
7191012 Boveja et al. Mar 2007 B2
7204815 Connor Apr 2007 B2
7209787 DiLorenzo Apr 2007 B2
7225019 Jahns et al. May 2007 B2
7228167 Kara et al. Jun 2007 B2
7238715 Tracey et al. Jul 2007 B2
7242984 DiLorenzo Jul 2007 B2
7269457 Shafer et al. Sep 2007 B2
7345178 Nunes et al. Mar 2008 B2
7373204 Gelfand et al. May 2008 B2
7454245 Armstrong et al. Nov 2008 B2
7544497 Sinclair et al. Jun 2009 B2
7561918 Armstrong et al. Jul 2009 B2
7711432 Thimineur et al. May 2010 B2
7751891 Armstrong et al. Jul 2010 B2
7776326 Milbrandt et al. Aug 2010 B2
7797058 Mrva et al. Sep 2010 B2
7822486 Foster et al. Oct 2010 B2
7937145 Dobak May 2011 B2
8103349 Donders et al. Jan 2012 B2
8180447 Dacey et al. May 2012 B2
9162064 Faltys et al. Oct 2015 B2
9174041 Faltys et al. Nov 2015 B2
9211410 Levine et al. Dec 2015 B2
9662490 Tracey et al. May 2017 B2
9700716 Faltys et al. Jul 2017 B2
9849286 Levine et al. Dec 2017 B2
20010002441 Boveja May 2001 A1
20010034542 Mann Oct 2001 A1
20020026141 Houben et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020040035 Myers et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020077675 Greenstein Jun 2002 A1
20020086871 O'Neill et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020095139 Keogh et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099417 Naritoku et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020138075 Edwards et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138109 Keogh et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020193859 Schulman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198570 Puskas Dec 2002 A1
20030018367 DiLorenzo Jan 2003 A1
20030023282 Barrett et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030045909 Gross et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030088301 King May 2003 A1
20030191404 Klein Oct 2003 A1
20030194752 Anderson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195578 Perron et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212440 Boveja Nov 2003 A1
20030229380 Adams et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236557 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236558 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002546 Altschuler Jan 2004 A1
20040015202 Chandler et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015205 Whitehurst et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024422 Hill et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040024428 Barrett et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040024439 Riso Feb 2004 A1
20040030362 Hill et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039427 Barrett et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040048795 Ivanova et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040049121 Yaron Mar 2004 A1
20040049240 Gerber et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059383 Puskas Mar 2004 A1
20040111139 McCreery et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040138517 Osorio et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138518 Rise et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138536 Frei et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040146949 Tan et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153127 Gordon et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040158119 Osorio et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040162584 Hill et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172074 Yoshihito Sep 2004 A1
20040172075 Shafer et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040172085 Knudson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040172086 Knudson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040172088 Knudson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040172094 Cohen et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040176812 Knudson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040178706 D'Orso Sep 2004 A1
20040193231 David et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199209 Hill et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199210 Shelchuk Oct 2004 A1
20040204355 Tracey et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215272 Haubrich et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215287 Swoyer et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040236381 Dinsmoor et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236382 Dinsmoor et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040240691 Grafenberg Dec 2004 A1
20040243182 Cohen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254612 Ezra et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267152 Pineda Dec 2004 A1
20050021092 Yun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021101 Chen et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027328 Greenstein Feb 2005 A1
20050043774 Devlin et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049655 Boveja et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065553 Ben Ezra et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065573 Rezai Mar 2005 A1
20050065575 Dobak Mar 2005 A1
20050070970 Knudson et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050070974 Knudson et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075701 Shafer Apr 2005 A1
20050075702 Shafer Apr 2005 A1
20050095246 Shafer May 2005 A1
20050096707 Hill et al. May 2005 A1
20050103351 Stomberg et al. May 2005 A1
20050125044 Tracey et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131467 Boveja Jun 2005 A1
20050131486 Boveja et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131487 Boveja Jun 2005 A1
20050131493 Boveja et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137644 Boveja et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137645 Voipio et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143781 Carbunaru et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143787 Boveja et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149126 Libbus Jul 2005 A1
20050149129 Libbus et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050149131 Libbus et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050153885 Yun et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154425 Boveja et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154426 Boveja et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165458 Boveja et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050177200 George et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050182288 Zabara Aug 2005 A1
20050182467 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187584 Denker et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187586 David et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187590 Boveja et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050191661 Gatanaga et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050192644 Boveja et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197600 Schuler et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197675 David et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197678 Boveja et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203501 Aldrich et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209654 Boveja et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216064 Heruth et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216070 Boveja et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216071 Devlin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050240229 Whitehurst et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240231 Aldrich et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240241 Yun et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240242 DiLorenzo Oct 2005 A1
20050251220 Barrett et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251222 Barrett et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267542 David et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267547 Knudson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050277912 John Dec 2005 A1
20050282906 Tracey et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283198 Haubrich et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060009815 Boveja et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015151 Aldrich Jan 2006 A1
20060025828 Armstrong et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036293 Whitehurst et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060052657 Zabara Mar 2006 A9
20060052831 Fukui Mar 2006 A1
20060052836 Kim et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058851 Cigaina Mar 2006 A1
20060064137 Stone Mar 2006 A1
20060064139 Chung et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074450 Boveja et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074473 Gertner Apr 2006 A1
20060079936 Boveja et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085046 Rezai et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095081 Zhou et al. May 2006 A1
20060095090 De Ridder May 2006 A1
20060100668 Ben-David et al. May 2006 A1
20060106755 Stuhec May 2006 A1
20060111644 Guttag et al. May 2006 A1
20060111754 Rezai et al. May 2006 A1
20060111755 Stone et al. May 2006 A1
20060116739 Betser et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060122675 Libbus et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129200 Kurokawa Jun 2006 A1
20060129202 Armstrong Jun 2006 A1
20060135998 Libbus et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142802 Armstrong Jun 2006 A1
20060142822 Tulgar Jun 2006 A1
20060149337 John Jul 2006 A1
20060155495 Osorio et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161216 John et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161217 Jaax et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167497 Armstrong et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167498 DiLorenzo Jul 2006 A1
20060167501 Ben-David et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173493 Armstrong et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060173508 Stone et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060178691 Binmoeller Aug 2006 A1
20060178706 Lisogurski et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190044 Libbus et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200208 Terry, Jr. et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060200219 Thrope et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060206155 Ben-David et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060206158 Wu et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229677 Moffitt et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060229681 Fischell Oct 2006 A1
20060241699 Libbus et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060247719 Maschino et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060247721 Maschino et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060247722 Maschino et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259077 Pardo et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259084 Zhang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259085 Zhang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259107 Caparso et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271115 Ben-Ezra et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282121 Payne et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060282131 Caparso et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060282145 Caparso et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287678 Shafer Dec 2006 A1
20060287679 Stone Dec 2006 A1
20060292099 Milburn et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060293720 DiLorenzo Dec 2006 A1
20060293721 Tarver et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060293723 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070016262 Gross et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016263 Armstrong et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021785 Inman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021786 Parnis et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021814 Inman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070025608 Armstrong Feb 2007 A1
20070027482 Parnis et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027483 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027484 Guzman et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027486 Armstrong Feb 2007 A1
20070027492 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027496 Parnis et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027497 Parnis Feb 2007 A1
20070027498 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027499 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027500 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027504 Barrett et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070055324 Thompson et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067004 Boveja et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083242 Mazgalev et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093434 Rossetti et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093870 Maschino Apr 2007 A1
20070093875 Chavan et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100263 Merfeld May 2007 A1
20070100377 Armstrong et al. May 2007 A1
20070100378 Maschino May 2007 A1
20070100380 Fukui May 2007 A1
20070100392 Maschino et al. May 2007 A1
20070106339 Errico et al. May 2007 A1
20070112404 Mann et al. May 2007 A1
20070118177 Libbus et al. May 2007 A1
20070118178 Fukui May 2007 A1
20070129767 Wahlstrand Jun 2007 A1
20070129780 Whitehurst et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135846 Knudson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135856 Knudson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135857 Knudson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135858 Knudson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142870 Knudson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142871 Libbus et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142874 John Jun 2007 A1
20070150021 Chen et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150027 Rogers Jun 2007 A1
20070198063 Hunter et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070244522 Overstreet Oct 2007 A1
20070250145 Kraus et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080140138 Ivanova et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080208266 Lesser et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080213331 Gelfand et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080234790 Bayer et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080249439 Tracey et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090048194 Aerssens et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090088821 Abrahamson Apr 2009 A1
20090143831 Huston et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090187231 Errico et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090247934 Tracey et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090275997 Faltys et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090281593 Errico Nov 2009 A9
20090312817 Hogle et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100125304 Faltys May 2010 A1
20100241183 DiLorenzo Sep 2010 A1
20100249859 DiLorenzo Sep 2010 A1
20110092882 Firlik et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110224749 Ben-David et al. Sep 2011 A1
20130317580 Simon et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140046407 Ben-Ezra et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140074186 Faltys et al. Mar 2014 A1
20150100100 Tracey et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150241447 Zitnik et al. Aug 2015 A1
20160038745 Faltys et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160067497 Levine et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160114165 Levine et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160331952 Faltys et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170113044 Levine et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170197076 Faltys et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170202467 Zitnik et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170203103 Levine et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170209705 Faltys et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170266448 Tracey et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170304613 Faltys et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180001096 Faltys et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180117320 Levine et al. May 2018 A1
20190046799 Levine et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190192847 Faltys et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190275328 Zitnik et al. Sep 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
2628045 Jan 1977 DE
3736664 May 1989 DE
20316509 Apr 2004 DE
0438510 Aug 1996 EP
0726791 Jun 2000 EP
1001827 Jan 2004 EP
2213330 Aug 2010 EP
04133 Feb 1910 GB
20050039445 Apr 2005 KR
WO1993001862 Feb 1993 WO
WO1997030998 Aug 1997 WO
WO1998020868 May 1998 WO
WO2000027381 May 2000 WO
WO2000047104 Aug 2000 WO
WO2001000273 Jan 2001 WO
WO2001008617 Feb 2001 WO
WO2001089526 Nov 2001 WO
WO2002044176 Jun 2002 WO
WO2002057275 Jul 2002 WO
WO2003072135 Sep 2003 WO
WO2004000413 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2004064918 Aug 2004 WO
WO2006073484 Jul 2006 WO
WO2006076681 Jul 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (198)
Entry
US 6,184,239 B1, 02/2001, Puskas (withdrawn)
Tracey et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/109,334 entitled “Inhibition of inflammatory cytokine production by cholinergic agonists and vagus nerve stimulation,” filed Apr. 24, 2008.
Tracey et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,808 entitled Devices and methods for inhibiting granulocyte activation by neural stimulation, filed Aug. 26, 2008.
Abraham, Coagulation abnormalities in acute lung injury and sepsis, Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., vol. 22, pp. 401-404, 2000.
Aekerlund et al., Anti-inflammatory effects of a new tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-Alpha) inhibitor (CNI-1493) in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) in rats, Clinical & Experimental Immunology, vol. 115, No. 1, pp. 32-41, Jan. 1, 1999.
Antonica, A., et al., Vagal control of lymphocyte release from rat thymus, J. Auton. Nerv. Syst., vol. 48, pp. 187-197, 1994.
Asakura et al., Non-surgical therapy for ulcerative colitis, Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 98, No. 4, pp. 431-437, Apr. 1997 (abstract only).
Bernik et al., Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates endotoxic shock and cardiac TNF production, 87th Clinical Congress of the American College of Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Oct. 9, 2001.
Bernik et al., Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates LPS-induced cardiac TNF production and myocardial depression IN shock, New York Surgical Society, New York, NY, Apr. 11, 2001.
Bernik, et al., Pharmacological stimulation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 195, No. 6, pp. 781-788, Mar. 18, 2002.
Bhattacharya, S.K. et al., Central muscarinic receptor subtypes and carrageenin-induced paw oedema in rats, Res. Esp. Med. vol. 191, pp. 65-76, 1991.
Bianchi et al., Suppression of proinflammatory cytokines in monocytes by a tetravalent guanylhydrazone, Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 183, pp. 927-936, Mar. 1996.
Blum, A. et al., Role of cytokines in heart failure, Am. Heart J., vol. 135, pp. 181-186, 1998.
Boldyreff, Gastric and intestinal mucus, its properties and physiological importance, Acta Medica Scandinavica (journal), vol. 89, pp. 1-14, 1936.
Borovikova et al., Efferent vagus nerve activity attenuates cytokine-mediated inflammation, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, vol. 26, No. 102, 2000 (abstract only).
Borovikova et al., Intracerebroventricular CNI-1493 prevents LPS-induced hypotension and peak serum TNF at a four-log lower dose than systemic treatment, 21st Annual Conference on Shock, San Antonio, TX, Jun. 14-17, 1998, Abstract No. 86.
Borovikova et al., Role of the efferent vagus nerve signaling in the regulation of the innate immune response to LPS, (supplemental to SHOCK, vol. 13, 2000, Molecular, cellular, and systemic pathobiological aspects and therapeutic approaches, abstracts, 5th World Congress on Trauma, Shock inflammation and sepsis-pathophysiology, immune consequences and therapy, Feb. 29, 2000-Mar. 4, 2000, Munich, DE), Abstract No. 166.
Borovikova et al., Role of the vagus nerve in the anti-inflammatory effects of CNI-1493, the FASEB journal, vol. 14, No. 4, 2000 (Experimental Biology 2000, San Diego, CA, Apr. 15-18, 2000, Abstract No. 97.9).
Borovikova et al., Vagotomy blocks the protective effects of I.C.V. CNI-1493 against LPS-induced shock, (Supplemental to SHOCK, vol. 11, 1999, Molecular, cellular, and systemic pathobioloigal aspects and therapeutic approaches, abstacts and program, Fourth International Shock Congress and 22nd Annual Conference on Shock, Philadelphia, PA, Jun. 12-16, 1999), Abstract No. 277.
Borovikova, L. V., et al., Role of vagus nerve signaling in CNI-1493-mediated suppression of acute inflammation, Autonomic Neuroscience, vol. 85, No. 1-3, pp. 141-147, Dec. 20, 2000.
Borovikova, L. V., et al., Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin, Nature, vol. 405, No. 6785: pp. 458-462, May 25, 2000.
Bumgardner, G. L. et al., Transplantation and cytokines, Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 189-204, 1999.
Carteron, N. L., Cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis: trials and tribulations, Mol. Med. Today, vol. 6, pp. 315-323, 2000.
Dibbs, Z., et al., Cytokines in heart failure: pathogenetic mechanisms and potential treatment, Proc. Assoc. Am. Physicians, vol. 111, No. 5, pp. 423-428, 1999.
Dinarello, C. A., The interleukin-1 family: 10 years of discovery, FASEB J., vol. 8, No. 15, pp. 1314-1325, 1994.
Doshi et al., Evolving role of tissue factor and its pathway inhibitor, Crit. Care Med., vol. 30, suppl. 5, pp. S241-S250, 2002.
Esmon, The protein C pathway, Crit. Care Med., vol. 28, suppl. 9, pp. S44-S48, 2000.
Fleshner, M., et al., Thermogenic and corticosterone responses to intravenous cytokines (IL-1? and TNF-?) are attenuated by subdiaphragmatic vagotomy, J. Neuroimmunol., vol. 86, pp. 134-141, 1998.
Fox, et al., Use of muscarinic agonists in the treatment of Sjorgren' syndrome, Clin. Immunol., vol. 101, No. 3; pp. 249-263, 2001.
Gattorno, M., et al., Tumor necrosis factor induced adhesion molecule serum concentrations in henoch-schoenlein purpura and pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus, J. Rheumatol., vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 2251-2255, 2000.
Gracie, J. A., et al., A proinflammatory role for IL-18 in rheumatoid arthritis, J. Clin. Invest., vol. 104, No. 10, pp. 1393-1401, 1999.
Granert et al., Suppression of macrophage activation with CNI-1493 increases survival in infant rats with systemic haemophilus influenzae infection, Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, No. 9, pp. 5329-5334, Sep. 2000.
Hirano, T., Cytokine suppresive agent improves survival rate in rats with acute pancreatitis of closed duodenal loop, J. Surg. Res., vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 224-229, 1999.
Holladay et al., Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as targets for drug discovery, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 40, pp. 4169-4194, 1997.
Hommes, D. W. et al., Anti- and Pro-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of tissue damage in Crohn's disease, Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 3., pp. 191-195, 2000.
Hsu, H. Y., et al., Cytokine release of peripheral blood monoculear cells in children with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol., vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 540-545, 1999.
Hu, et al., The effect of norepinephrine on endotoxin-mediated macrophage activation, J. Neuroimmunol., vol. 31, pp. 35-42, 1991.
Jander, S. et al., Interleukin-18 is induced in acute inflammatory demyelinating polymeuropathy, J. Neuroimmunol., vol. 114, pp. 253-258, 2001.
Kanai, T. et al., Interleukin-18 and Crohn's disease, Digestion, vol. 63, suppl. 1, pp. 37-42, 2001.
Katagiri, M., et al., Increased cytokine production by gastric mucosa in patients with helicobacter pylori infection, J. Clin, Gastroenterol., vol. 25, Suppl. 1, pp. S211-S214, 1997.
Kimball, et al., Levamisole causes differential cytokine expression by elicited mouse peritoneal macrophases, Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vo. 52, No. 3, pp. 349-356, 1992 (abstract only).
Kimmings, A. N., et al., Systemic inflammatory response in acute cholangitis and after subsequent treatment, Eur. J. Surg., vol. 166, pp. 700-705, 2000.
Kirchner et al.; Left vagus nerve stimulation suppresses experimentally induced pain; Neurology; vol. 55; pp. 1167-1171; 2000.
Kumins, N. H., et al., Partial hepatectomy reduces the endotoxin-induced peak circulating level of tumor necrosis factor in rats, SHOCK, vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 385-388, 1996.
Lee, H. G., et al., Peritoneal lavage fluids stimulate NIH3T3 fibroblast proliferation and contain increased tumour necrosis factor and IL6 in experimental silica-induced rat peritonitis, Clin. Exp. Immunol., vol. 100, pp. 139-144, 1995.
Lipton, J. M. et al.; Anti-inflammatory actions of the neuroimmunomodulator ?-MSH, Immunol. Today, vol. 18, pp. 140-145, 1997.
Martiney et al., Prevention and treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by CNI-1493, a macrophage-deactivating agent, Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, No. 11, pp. 5588-5595, Jun. 1, 1998.
McGuinness, P. H., et al., Increases in intrahepatic CD68 positive cells, MAC387 positive cells, and proinflammatory cytokines (particulary interleukin 18) in chronic hepatitis C infection, Gut, vol. 46, pp. 260-269, 2000.
Minnich et al.; Anti-cytokine and anti-inflammatory therapies for the treatment of severe sepsis: progress and pitfalls; Proceedings of the Nutrition Society; vol. 63; pp. 437-441; 2004.
Molina et al., CNI-1493 attenuates hemodynamic and pro-inflammatory responses to LPS, Shock, vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 329-334, Nov. 1998.
Nathan, C. F., Secretory products of macrophages, J. Clin. Invest., vol. 79, pp. 319-326, 1987.
Navalkar et al.; Irbesartan, an angiotensin type 1 receptor inhibitor, regulates markers of inflammation in patients with premature atherosclerosis; Journal of the American College of Cardiology; vol. 37; No. 2; pp. 440-444; 2001.
Palmblad et al., Dynamics of early synovial cytokine expression in rodent collagen-induced arthritis: a thereapeutic study unding a macrophage-deactivation compound, American Journal of Pathology, vol. 158, No. 2, pp. 491-500, Feb. 2, 2001.
Prystowsky, J. B. et al., Interleukin-1 mediates guinea pig gallbladder inflammation in vivo, J. Surg. Res., vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 123-126, 1997.
Pulkki, K. J., Cytokines and cardiomyocyte death, Ann. Med., vol. 29, pp. 339-343, 1997.
Rayner, S. A. et al., Local bioactive tumour necrosis factor (TNF) in corneal allotransplantation, Clin. Exp. Immunol., vol. 122, pp. 109-116, 2000.
Romanovsky, A. A., et al.,The vagus nerve in the thermoregulatory response to systemic inflammation, Am. J. Physiol., vol. 273, No. 1 (part 2), pp. R407-R413, 1997.
Scheinman, R. I., et al., Role of transcriptional activation of I?B? in mediation of immunosuppression by glucocorticoids, Science, vol. 270, pp. 283-286, 1995.
Stalcup et al., Endothelial cell functions in the hemodynamic responses to stress, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 401, pp. 117-131, 1982.
Sugano et al., Nicotine inhibits the production of inflammatory mediators in U937 cells through modulation of nuclear factor-kappaβ activation, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 252, No. 1, pp. 25-28, Nov. 9, 1998.
Tracey et al., Mind over immunity, Faseb Journal, vol. 15, No. 9, pp. 1575-1576, Jul. 2001.
Tracey, K. J. et al., Shock and tissue injury induced by recombinant human cachectin, Science, vol. 234, pp. 470-474, 1986.
Tracey, K.J., The inflammatory reflex, Nature, vol. 420, pp. 853-859, 2002.
VanHoutte, et al., Muscarinic and beta-adrenergic prejunctional modulation of adrenergic neurotransmission in the blood vessel wall, Gen Pharmac., vol. 14, pp. 35-37, 1983.
Ventureyra, Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation for partial onset seizure therapy, Child's Nerv Syst, vol. 16, pp. 101-102, 2000.
Villa et al., Protection against lethal polymicrobial sepsis by CNI-1493, an inhibitor of pro-inflammatory cytokine synthesis, Journal of Endotoxin Research, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 197-204, 1997.
Von Känal, et al., Effects of non-specific ?-adrenergic stimulation and blockade on blood coagulation in hypertension, J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 94, pp. 1455-1459, 2003.
Waserman, S. et al., TNF-? dysregulation in asthma: relationship to ongoing corticosteroid therapy, Can. Respir. J., vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 229-237, 2000.
Watanabe, H. et al., The significance of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels for rejection of joint allograft, J. Reconstr. Microsurg., vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 193-197, 1997.
Watkins, L.R. et al., Implications of immune-to-brain communication for sickness and pain, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 96, pp. 7710-7713, 1999.
Woiciechowsky, C. et al., Sympathetic activation triggers systemic interleukin-10 release in immunodepression induced by brain injury, Nature Med., vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 808-813, 1998.
Yeh, S.S. et al., Geriatric cachexia: the role of cytokines, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., vol. 70, pp. 183-197, 1999.
Zhang et al., Tumor necrosis factor, The Cytokine Handbook, 3rd ed., Ed. Thompson, Academic Press, pp. 517-548, 1998.
Ilton et al., “Differential expression of neutrophil adhesion molecules during coronary artery surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Mosby-Year Book, inc., St. Louis, Mo, US, pp. 930-937, Nov. 1, 1999.
Shapiro et al.; Prospective, randomised trial of two doses of rFVIIa (NovoSeven) in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing surgery; Thromb Haemost; vol. 80; pp. 773-778; 1998.
Saghizadeh et al.; The expression of TNFα by human muscle; J. Clin. Invest.; vol. 97; No. 4; pp. 1111-1116; 1996.
Zitnik et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/874,171 entitled “Prescription pad for treatment of inflammatory disorders,” filed Sep. 1, 2010.
Corcoran, et al., The effects of vagus nerve stimulation on pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in humans: a preliminary report, NeuroImmunoModulation, vol. 12, pp. 307-309, 2005.
VanWesterloo, et al., The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway regulates the host response during septic peritonitis, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 191, pp. 2138-2148, Jun. 15, 2005.
Benthem et al.; Parasympathetic inhibition of sympathetic neural activity to the pancreas; Am.J.Physiol Endocrinol.Metab; 280; pp. E378-E381; 2001.
Bernik et al., Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates cardiac TNF production in endotoxic shock, (supplemental to SHOCK, vol. 15, 2001, Injury, inflammation and sepsis: laboratory and clinical approaches, SHOCK, Abstracts, 24th Annual Conference on Shock, Marco Island, FL, Jun. 9-12, 2001), Abstract No. 81.
Besedovsky, H., et al., Immunoregulatory feedback between interleukin-1 and glucocorticoid hormones, Science, vol. 233, pp. 652-654, 1986.
Blackwell, T. S. et al., Sepsis and cytokines: current status, Br. J. Anaesth., vol. 77, pp. 110-117, 1996.
Borovikova et al., Acetylcholine inhibition of immune response to bacterial endotoxin in human macrophages, Abstracts, Society for Neuroscience, 29th Annual Meeting, Miami Beach, FL, Oct. 23-28, 1999, Abstract No. 624.6.
Bulloch et al.; Characterization of choline O-acetyltransferase (ChAT) in the BALB/C mouse spleen; Int.J.Neurosci.; 76; pp. 141-149; 1994.
Burke et al., Bent pseudoknots and novel RNA inhibitors of type 1 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase, J. Mol. Biol., vol. 264; pp. 650-666, 1996.
Cano et al.; Characterization of the central nervous system innervation of the rat spleen using viral transneuronal tracing; J.Comp Neurol.; 439; pp. 1-18; 2001.
Das, Critical advances in spticemia and septic shock, Critical Care, vol. 4, pp. 290-296, Sep. 7, 2000.
Del Signore et al; Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in the rat sympathetic ganglion: pharmacological characterization, subcellular distribution and effect of pre- and postganglionic nerve crush; J.Neuropathol.Exp.Neurol.; 63(2); pp. 138-150; Feb. 2004.
Ellington et al., In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands, Nature, vol. 346, pp. 818-822, Aug. 30, 1990.
Fox, D. A., Cytokine blockade as a new strategy to treat rheumatoid arthritis, Arch. Intern. Med., vol. 160, pp. 437-444, Feb. 28, 2000.
Gaykema, R. P., et al., Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy suppresses endotoxin-induced activation of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons and ACTH secretion, Endocrinology, vol. 136, No. 10, pp. 4717-4720, 1995.
Ghelardini et al., S-(−)-ET 126: A potent and selective M1 antagonist in vitro and in vivo, Life Sciences, vol. 58, No. 12, pp. 991-1000, 1996.
Goyal et al., Nature of the vagal inhibitory innervation to the lower esophageal sphincter, Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 55, pp. 1119-1126, May 1975.
Green et al., Feedback technique for deep relaxation, Psycophysiology, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 371-377, Nov. 1969.
Gregory et al., Neutrophil-kupffer-cell interaction in host defenses to systemic infections, Immunology Today, vol. 19, No. 11, pp. 507-510, Nov. 1998.
Guslandi, M., Nicotine treatment for ulcerative colitis, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., vol. 48, pp. 481-484, 1999.
Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, vol. 13, pp. 511-515 and 1433-1435, 1994.
Hirao et al., the limits of specificity: an experimental analysis with RNA aptamers to MS2 coat protein variants, Mol. Divers., vol. 4, pp. 75-89, 1999.
Hsu, et al., Analysis of efficiency of magnetic stimulation, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 50(11), pp. 1276-1285, Nov. 2003.
Jaeger et al., The structure of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase complexed with an RNA pseudoknot inhibitor, The EMBO Journal, 17(15), pp. 4535-4542, 1998.
Joshi et al., Potent inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replection by template analog reverse transcriptase , J. Virol., 76(13), pp. 6545-6557, Jul. 2002.
Kawashima, et al., Extraneuronal cholinergic system in lymphocytes, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 86, pp. 29-48, 2000.
Kees et al; Via beta-adrenoceptors, stimulation of extrasplenic sympathetic nerve fibers inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF secretion in perfused rat spleen; J.Neuroimmunol.; 145; pp. 77-85; 2003.
Kensch et al., HIV-1 reverse transcriptase-pseudoknot RNA aptamer interaction has a binding affinity in the low picomolar range coupled with high specificity, J. Biol. Chem., 275(24), pp. 18271-18278, Jun. 16, 2000.
Kokkula, R. et al., Successful treatment of collagen-induced arthritis in mice and rats by targeting extracellular high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 activity, Arthritis Rheum., 48(7), pp. 2052-2058, Jul. 2003.
LeNovere, N. et al., Molecular evolution of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: an example of multigene family in excitable cells, J. Mol. Evol., 40, pp. 155-172, 1995.
Leonard, S. et al., Neuronal nicotinic receptors: from structure to function, Nicotine & Tobacco Res. 3:203-223 (2001).
Madretsma, G. S., et al., Nicotine inhibits the in vitro production of interleukin 2 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha by human monocuclear cells, Immunopharmacology, vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 47-51, 1996.
Martindale: The extrapharcopoeia; 28th Ed. London; The pharmaceutical press; pp. 446-485; 1982.
Nagashima et al., Thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) deficiency is compatible with murine life, J. Clin. Invest., 109, pp. 101-110, 2002.
Noguchi et al., Increases in Gastric acidity in response to electroacupuncture stimulation of hindlimb of anesthetized rats, Jpn. J. Physiol., 46(1), pp. 53-58, 1996.
Norton, Can ultrasound be used to stimulate nerve tissue, BioMedical Engineering, 2(1), pp. 6, 2003.
Rinner et al.; Rat lymphocytes produce and secrete acetylcholine in dependence of differentiation and activation; J.Neuroimmunol.; 81; pp. 31-37; 1998.
Saindon et al.; Effect of cervical vagotomy on sympathetic nerve responses to peripheral interleukin-1 beta; Auton.Neuroscience Basic and Clinical; 87; pp. 243-248; 2001.
Saito, Involvement of muscarinic M1 receptor in the central pathway of the serotonin-induced bezold-jarisch reflex in rats, J. Autonomic Nervous System, vol. 49, pp. 61-68, 1994.
Sandborn, W. J., et al., Transdermal nicotine for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis, Ann. Intern. Med, vol. 126, No. 5, pp. 364-371, 1997.
Sato, E., et al., Acetylcholine stimulates alveolar macrophages to release inflammatory cell chemotactic activity, Am. J. Physiol., vol. 274, pp. L970-L979, 1998.
Sato, K.Z., et al., Diversity of mRNA expression for muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits in human mononuclear leukosytes and leukemic cell lines, Neuroscience Letters, vol. 266, pp. 17-20, 1999.
Schneider et al., High-affinity ssDNA inhibitors of the review transcriptase of type 1 human immunodeficiency virus, Biochemistry, 34(29), pp. 9599-9610, 1995.
Shafer, Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance, Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 247-277, 2002.
Sher, M. E., et al., The influence of cigarette smoking on cytokine levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, Inflamm. Bowel Dis., vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 73-78, 1999.
Shi et al.; Effects of efferent vagus nerve excitation on inflammatory response in heart tissue in rats with endotoxemia; vol. 15, No. 1; pp. 26-28; 2003 (Eng. Abstract).
Snyder et al., Correction of hemophilia B in canine and murine models using recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors; Nature Medicine, 5(1), pp. 64-70, Jan. 1999.
Steinlein, New functions for nicotine acetylcholine receptors?, Behavioural Brain Res., vol. 95, pp. 31-35, 1998.
Sternberg, E. M., Perspectives series: cytokines and the brain ‘neural-immune interactions in health and disease,’ J. Clin. Invest., vol. 100, No. 22, pp. 2641-2647, Dec. 1997.
Sykes, et al., An investigation into the effect and mechanisms of action of nicotine in inflammatory bowel disease, Inflamm. Res., vol. 49, pp. 311-319, 2000.
Toyabe, et al., Identification of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on lymphocytes in the periphery as well as thymus in mice, Immunology, vol. 92, pp. 201-205, 1997.
Tracey, K. J. et al., Anti-cachectin/TNF monoclonal antibodies prevent septic shock during lethal bacteraemia; Nature, 330: pp. 662-664, 1987.
Tsutsui, H., et al., Pathophysiolocical roles of interleukin-18 in inflammatory liver diseases; Immunol. Rev., 174:192-209, 2000.
Tuerk et al., RNA pseudoknots that inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, pp. 6988-6992, Aug. 1992.
Tuerk et al., Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase; Science, 249(4968), pp. 505-510, Aug. 3, 1990.
Van Dijk, A. P., et al., Transdermal nictotine inhibits interleukin 2 synthesis by mononuclear cells derived from healthy volunteers, Eur. J. Clin. Invest, vol. 28, pp. 664-671, 1998.
Walland et al., Compensation of muscarinic brochial effects of talsaclidine by concomitant sympathetic activation in guinea pigs; European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 330, pp. 213-219, 1997.
Wang et al.; Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha7 subunit is an essential regulator of inflammation; Nature; 421; 384-388; Jan. 23, 2003.
Wang, H., et al., HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice, Science, vol. 285, pp. 248-251, Jul. 9, 1999.
Wathey, J.C. et al., Numerical reconstruction of the quantal event at nicotinic synapses; Biophys. J., vol. 27: pp. 145-164, Jul. 1979.
Watkins, L.R. et al., Blockade of interleukin-1 induced hyperthermia by subdiaphragmatic vagotomy: evidence for vagal mediation of immune-brain communication, Neurosci. Lett., vol. 183, pp. 27-31, 1995.
Whaley, K. et al., C2 synthesis by human monocytes is modulated by a nicotinic cholinergic receptor, Nature, vol. 293, pp. 580-582, Oct. 15, 1981.
Cicala et al., “Linkage between inflammation and coagulation: An update on the molecular basis of the crosstalk,” Life Sciences, vol. 62(20); pp. 1817-1824, 1998.
Kalishevskaya et al. “The character of vagotomy-and atropin-induced hypercoagulation,” Fizio. Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova, 65(3): pp. 398-404, 1979.
Khatun, S., et al., “Induction of hypercoagulability condition by chronic localized cold stress in rabbits,” Thromb. and Haemost., 81: pp. 449-455, 1999.
Kudrjashov, et al. “Reflex nature of the physiological anticoagulating system,” Nature, vol. 196(4855): pp. 647-649; 1962.
Kuznik, et al., “Secretion of blood coagulation factors into saliva under conditions of hypo- and hypercoagulation,” Voprosy Meditsinskoi Khimii, vol. 19(1): pp. 54-57; 1973.
Kuznik, et al., “Heart as an efferent regulator of the process of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis,” Kardiologiia, vol. 13(3): pp. 10-17, 1973.
Kuznik, et al., “Blood Coagulation in stimulation of the vagus nerve in cats,” Biull. Eskp. Biol. Med., vol. 78(7): pp. 7-9, 1974.
Kuznik, et al., “The role of the vascular wall in the mechanism of control of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis on stimulation of the vagus nerve,” Cor Vasa, vol. 17(2): pp. 151-158, 1975.
Kuznik, et al., “The dynamics of procoagulatible and fibrinolytic activities during electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves,” Fizio. Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova, 3: pp. 414-420, 1979.
Lang, et al., “Neurogienic control of cerebral blood flow,” Experimental Neurology, 43: pp. 143-161, 1974.
Mishchenko, “The role of specific adreno-and choline-receptors of the vascular wall in the regulation of blood coagulation in the stimulation of the vagus nerve,” Biull. Eskp. Biol. Med., vol. 78(8): pp. 19-22, 1974.
Mishchenko, et al., “Coagulation of the blood and fibrinolysos in dogs during vagal stimulation,” Fizio. Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova, vol. 61(1): pp. 101-107, 1975.
Von Känal, et al., Effects of sympathetic activation by adrenergic infusions on hemostasis in vivo, Eur. J. Haematol., vol. 65: pp. 357-369, 2000.
Cohen, “The immunopathogenesis of sepsis,” vol. 420(19): pp. 885-891, 2002.
Weiner, et al., “Inflammation and therapeutic vaccination in CNS diseases,” vol. 420(19): pp. 879-884, 2002.
Benoist, et al., “Mast cells in autoimmune disease” vol. 420(19): pp. 875-878, 2002.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,197 entitled “Modulation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway to treat pain or addiction,” filed Nov. 1, 2010.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/978,250 entitled “Neural stimulation devices and systems for treatment of chronic inflammation,” filed Dec. 23, 2010.
Ben-Noun et al.; Neck circumference as a simple screening measure for identifying overweight and obese patients; Obesity Research; vol. 9; No. 8; pp. 470-477; Aug. 8, 2001.
Bushby et al.; Centiles for adult head circumference; Archives of Disease in Childhood; vol. 67; pp. 1286-1287; 1992.
Pulvirenti et al.; Drug dependence as a disorder of neural plasticity:focus on dopamine and glutamate; Rev Neurosci.; vol. 12; No. 2; pp. 141-158; 2001.
Payne, J. B. et al., Nicotine effects on PGE2 and IL-1 beta release by LPS-treated human monocytes, J. Perio. Res., vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 99-104, 1996.
Pullan, R. D., et al., Transdermal nicotine for active ulceratiive colitis, N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 330, No. 12, pp. 811-815, 1994.
Takeuchi et al., A comparision between Chinese blended medicine “Shoseiryuto” tranilast and ketotifen on the anit-allergic action in the guinea pigs, Allergy, vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 387-393, 1985 (eng. abstract).
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/797,452 entitled “Nerve cuff with pocket for leadness stimulator,” filed Jun. 9, 2010.
Hoffer et al.; Implantable electrical and mechanical interfaces with nerve and muscle; Annals of Biomedical Engineering; vol. 8; pp. 351-360; 1980.
Krarup et al.; Conduction studies in peripheral cat nerve using implanted electrodes: I. methods and findings in controls; Muscle & Nerve; vol. 11; pp. 922-932; Sep. 1988.
Loeb et al.; Cuff electrodes for chronic stimulation and recording of peripheral nerve activity; Journal of Neuroscience Methods; vol. 64; pp. 95-103; 1996.
Strojnik et al.; Treatment of drop foot using and implantable peroneal underknee stimulator; Scand. J. Rehab. Med.; vol. 19; pp. 37R43; 1987.
Beliavskaia et al.,“On the effects of prolonged stimulation of the peripheral segment of the vagus nerve on blood clotting time under different bodily conditions,” Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal SSSR Imeni I.M. Sechenova., vol. 52(11); p. 1315-1321, Nov. 1966.
Kalishevskaya et al.; Neural regulation of the fluid state of the blood; Usp. Fiziol. Nauk;,vol. 13; No. 2; pp. 93-122; 1982.
Kuznik, et al., “Role of the heart and vessels in regulating blood coagulation and fibrinolysis,” Kagdiologiia, vol. 13(4): pp. 145-154, 1973.
Kuznik, “Role of the vascular wall in the process of hemostatis,” Usp Sovrem Biol., vol. 75(1): pp. 61-85, 1973.
Pateyuk, et al.,“Treatment of Botkin's disease with heparin,” Klin. Med., vol. 51(3): pp. 113-117, 1973.
Sokratov, et al. “The role of choline and adrenegic structures in regulation of renal excretion of hemocoagulating compounds into the urine,” Sechenov Physiological Journal of the USSR, vol. 63(12): pp. 1728-1732, 1977.
Nadol et al., “Surgery of the Ear and Temporal Bone,” Lippinkott Williams & Wilkins, 2nd Ed., 2005, (Publication date: Sep. 21, 2004), p. 580.
Levine, Jacob A.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/338,185 entitled “Modulation of sirtuins by vagus nerve stimulation” filed Dec. 27, 2011.
Levine et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,013 entitled “Devices and methods for modulation of bone erosion,” filed Mar. 26, 2013.
Robinson et al.; Studies with the Electrocardiograph on the Action of the Vagus Nerve on the Human Heart; J Exp Med; 14(3):217-234; Sep. 1911.
Levine et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/467,928 entitled “Single-Pulse Activation of the Cholinergic Anti-Inflammatory Pathway to Treat Chronic Inflammation,” filed May 9, 2012.
Elenkov et al.; Stress, corticotropin-releasing hormone, glucocorticoids, and the immune / inflammatory response: acute and chronic effects; Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.; 876; pp. 1-13; Jun. 22, 1999.
Reale et al.; Treatment with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor in alzheimer patients modulates the expression and production of the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines; J. Neuroimmunology; 148(1-2); pp. 162-171; Mar. 2004.
Stevens et al.; The anti-inflammatory effect of some immunosuppressive agents; J. Path.; 97(2); pp. 367-373; 1969 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date).
Cavaillon et al.; The pro-inflammatory cytokine casade; Immune Response in the Critically III; Springer-Verlag Berlin Hiedelberg; pp. 37-66; Jan. 21, 2002.
Clark et al.; Enhanced recognition memory following vagus nerve stimulation in human subjects; Nat. Neurosci.; 2(1); pp. 94-98; Jan. 1999.
Groves et al.; Recordings from the rat locus coeruleus during acute vagal nerve stimulation in the anaesthetised rat; Neuroscience Letters; 379(3); pp. 174-179; May 13, 2005.
Peuker; The nerve supply of the human auricle; Clin. Anat.; 15(1); pp. 35-37; Jan. 2002.
Swick et al.; Locus coeruleus neuronal activity in awake monkeys: relationship to auditory P300-like potentials and spontaneous EEG. Exp. Brain Res.; 101(1); pp. 86-92; Sep. 1994.
Tekdemir et al.; A clinico-anatomic study of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve and arnold's ear-cough reflex; Surg. Radiol. Anat.; 20(4); pp. 253-257; Mar. 1998.
Zamotrinsky et al.; Vagal neurostimulation in patients with coronary artery disease; Auton. Neurosci.; 88(1-2); pp. 109-116; Apr. 2001.
Tracey et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/716,408 entitled “Treatment of bleeding by non-invasive stimulation,” filed Sep. 26, 2017.
Pongratz et al.; The sympathetic nervous response in inflammation; Arthritis Research and Therapy; 16(504); 12 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://arthritis-research.com/content/16/6/504); Jan. 2014.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/005,191 entitled “Neural stimulation devices and systems for treatment of chronic inflammation,” filed Jun. 11, 2018.
Levine et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/157,222 entitled “Vagus nerve stimulation to treat neurodegenerative disorders,” filed Oct. 11, 2018.
Tracey et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,581 entitled “Inhibition of inflammatory cytokine production by cholinergic agnostics and vagus nerve stimulation,” filed Dec. 23, 2018.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/544,805 entitled “Nerve cuff with pocket for leadless stimulator,” filed Aug. 19, 2019.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/544,882 entitled “Neural stimulation devices and systems for treatment of chronic inflammation,” filed Aug. 19, 2019.
Manogue; U.S. Appl. No. 16/582,726 entitled “Methods and apparatuses for reducing bleeding via coordinated trigeminal and vagal nerve stimulation,” filed Sep. 25, 2019.
Koopman et al.; Pilot study of stimulation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway with an implantable vagus nerve stimulation device in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting; Abstract No. 451; 4 pages; retrieved from the internet (https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pilot-study-of-stimulation-of-the-cholinergic-anti-inflammatory-pathway-with-an-implantable-vagus-nerve-stimulation-device-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis); (Abstract Only); on Sep. 24, 2020.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060178703 A1 Aug 2006 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60639332 Dec 2004 US