Exemplary methods, devices, systems, etc., presented herein generally relate to implantable devices for delivery of cardiac therapy.
According to epidemiologic data, as many as 5 million Americans are afflicted with heart failure (HF). For many of these patients, health related quality of life (HRQoL) is poor and the 5 year mortality rate is extremely high. Further, the rate of hospitalizations for HF increased more than three times between 1970 and 1994 at age 45 to 64 and at age 65 and older. With the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta blockers as possible exceptions, advances in drug therapy for hypertension, myocardial ischemia, and valvular heart disease have not resulted in substantial improvements in survival once congestive heart failure (CHF) ensues. Non-drug therapies for HF include cardiac transplantation, mechanical pumps for ventricular assist and cardiac pacing. Such non-drug therapies can improve HRQoL and decrease mortality rate.
As many HF patients have health conditions that can affect cardiac performance, an understanding of comorbidity can help in selecting appropriate treatment. In general, the term comorbidity is used to indicate a medical condition in a patient that causes, is caused by, or is otherwise related to another condition in the same patient. For example, a primary condition of interest may be HF and diabetes may be a related, secondary condition. Indeed, various studies show that CHF incidence rate in type 2 diabetes patients, and hence comorbidity, is significant and that treatment should focus on controlling modifiable risk factors for CHF, namely hyperglycemia, elevated blood pressure, and obesity.
Type 2 diabetes is a metabolic disorder that is epidemic in the Unites States and around the world. More than 150 million people in the world are diabetic and, by the year 2010, over 200 million people are expected to be diabetic. In the U.S., for those born in the year 2000, estimated lifetime risk for diabetes is greater than 1 in 3. The economic and human cost of this disease is devastating. The current cost of diabetes in the U.S. is estimated to be at $132 billion, which includes $92 billion of direct medical costs and $40 billion of indirect costs such as disability, work loss and premature mortality. The current diabetic epidemic has been accompanied by a similar increase in obesity. Traditional glucophage medications do not offer an acceptable treatment for most type 2 diabetics and many progress to develop life shortening and debilitating comorbidities such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, renal disease, neuropathies, blindness, etc.
Various exemplary devices, systems, methods, etc., discussed herein aim to treat HF using techniques that directly promote cardiac health or that indirectly promote cardiac health by treating secondary conditions (e.g., metabolic disorders) that have been shown to be related to HF.
An exemplary method for treating heart failure includes diagnosing heart failure and calling for delivery of energy to the distal ileum to activate L cells using an implantable device where activation of L cells causes release of GLP-1 and where release of GLP-1 treats heart failure. Various other methods, devices, systems, etc., are also disclosed.
Features and advantages of the described implementations can be more readily understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The following description includes the best mode presently contemplated for practicing the described implementations. This description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but rather is made merely for the purpose of describing the general principles of the implementations. The scope of the described implementations should be ascertained with reference to the issued claims.
Various exemplary therapies described herein treat HF by inducing secretion of GLP-1. Various studies using animal HF models show that administration of the entero hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) can increase cardiac output and improve overall hemodynamics. Further, a study by Rocca and Brubaker shows that GLP-1 secretion can be induced in rats by using a Grass stimulator (Grass Instruments, Quincey, Mass.) to deliver electrical stimulation to the distal portion of the celiac branch of the vagal nerve (“Role of the Vagus Nerve in Mediating Proximal Nutrient-induced Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Secretion”, Endocrinology 140: 1687-1694, 1999). Various therapies discussed herein use an implantable device to induce secretion of GLP-1 to treat a HF patient.
Described below are various exemplary system scenarios that include at least one implantable device, an example of circuitry that may be included in an implantable device, various exemplary methods for inducing secretion of GLP-1, various mechanisms for inducing secretion of GLP-1, approximate anatomical diagrams for the duodenum and distal ileum, some control logic schemes for use in delivering a therapy and some flow diagrams of some more specific exemplary methods.
Various exemplary devices, systems, methods, etc., call for delivery of electrical energy to one or more sites to control, directly and/or indirectly, one or more hormones that play a role in cardiac health. For example, an exemplary technique includes delivering electrical energy to a proximal site (e.g., at or near the duodenum, proximal segment of the jejunum, etc.) and a distal site (e.g., distal ileum near the cecum) to control release of one or more hormones. Such delivery of energy may activate and/or block activity (e.g., inhibit nutrient activation of a neuroendocrine mechanism). In addition to having an effect on cardiac health, such techniques may aid glycemic control, decrease insulin resistance, improve beta cell function (e.g., hormone synthesis and/or release), promote satiety, etc.
In addition, various studies indicate that autonomic mechanisms play a role in hormone synthesis, release and/or regulation. In particular, afferent and/or efferent parasympathetic pathways play a role. Various exemplary techniques may include activation and/or blockade of autonomic traffic. Such techniques may deliver electrical energy to the celiac branch of the vagus nerve.
An exemplary therapy may be substituted for a conventional therapy or used as an adjunct therapy for increasing effectiveness of a conventional therapy. An exemplary therapy may be delivered using open-loop or closed-loop techniques.
The exemplary scenario 102 includes a single implantable device 110 that can sense, activate and/or block activity of a proximal portion and/or a distal portion of the gastrointestinal system. More specifically, as discussed below, a proximal portion may include the duodenum and/or a proximal portion of the jejunum) and a distal portion may include the ileum proximate to the cecum, the cecum and/or the ileocecal valve.
As described in more detail below, an exemplary method implemented by the device 110 may stimulate a proximal site 103 more or less frequently than a distal site 105. Such a method may act to conserve power of an implantable device, noting that such a device may be rechargeable or have a replaceable power source. A rechargeable device may rely on an external power source that transmits energy to charge a capacitor or other storage.
The exemplary scenario 104 includes two or more implantable devices 112, 114. In this example, the device 112 senses, activates and/or blocks activity associated with a proximal portion of the gastrointestinal system 103. The other device 114 senses, activates and/or blocks activity associated with a distal portion of the gastrointestinal system 105. In general, the devices 112, 114 operate in a coordinated manner to delivery therapy to induce release of GLP-1 to improve cardiac condition. The devices 112, 114 may include circuits to allow for uni-directional or bi-directional communication. Pseudo-communication may occur via a circuit in one of the devices that detects electrical or other actions of the other device. For example, where the device 112 delivers energy to the stomach, the device 114 may sense the electrical activity via one or more electrodes or other circuits. The device 114 may rely on such information to determine appropriate action (e.g., sensing, activating, blocking, alerting, communicating, etc.).
The exemplary scenario 106 includes the implantable device 112 alone while the exemplary scenario 108 includes the implantable device 114, hence, if combined, the exemplary scenarios 106 and 108 are the same as the scenario 104.
Any of the scenarios 102, 104, 106, 108 may include an external device configured to acquire information from an implantable device and/or acquire information about the body 101. For example, an external device may acquire body weight information and then communicate this information to the implantable device 112 and/or 114. In turn, the implantable device 112 and/or 114 may use the communicated information to determine an action related to one or more proximal sites 103 and/or one or more distal sites 105.
The exemplary device 200 includes a programmable microprocessor 210 that can implement control logic 230 and other instructional modules 234. Information may be stored in memory 224 and accessed by the programmable microprocessor 210. For delivery activation energy, the device 200 includes one or more pulse generators 242, 244. The pulse generators 242, 244 may rely on a switch 220 for delivery of energy via one or more connectors 225. While a device may include one or more integral leads, in general, a device includes one or more connectors for connecting a lead or leads to the device. More particularly, the connectors 225 provide for electrically connecting one or more electrodes to the circuitry of the device 200. In the example of
The device 200 further includes one or more analog to digital converters 252, 254 for converting analog signals to digital signals or values. The processor 210 may use a signal provided by one of the A/D converters 252, 254 to control a therapy or other process. A control signal from the processor 210 may instruct the switch 220 to select a particular electrode configuration for sensing electrical or other activity. As discussed below, various techniques include sensing nerve activity or other activity.
The device may include one or more physiological sensors 260. Such sensors may be housed within a case of the device 200 (e.g., a motion sensor), include a surface mounted component, include a lead, include a remote sensor, etc. A sensor may provide a digital signal or an analog signal for use by the processor 210 or other circuitry of the device 200. A physiological sensor may provide a signal via one or more of the connectors 225. A physiological sensor may provide information on cardiac condition and/or cardiac performance. For example, a pressure sensor may provide information as to cardiac output.
For purposes of communication with external or other implantable devices, the device 200 includes a telemetry circuit 270. The telemetry circuit 270 may include one or more antennae for transmission and/or receipt of electromagnetic signals. Such a circuit may operate according to a specialized frequency or frequencies designated for medical devices. Various conventional implantable devices rely on an associated programmer, which is an typically an external computing device with a communication circuit suitable for communicating with an implantable device for purposes of data transfer, status checks, software download, etc. Where the circuit 270 communicates with an implantable device or a device in electrical connection with a patient's body, then the body may be a conductive medium for transfer of information. For example, the circuit 270 may be capable of communication with a specialized wristwatch where the body is relied upon as a conductor.
The device 200 further includes an impedance measuring circuit 274. Such a circuit may rely on instructions from the processor 210. For example, the processor 210 may instruct the circuit 274 to provide a measured impedance for a particular electrode configuration. In such an example, the processor 210 may also instruct the switch 220 to provide the circuit 274 with a particular electrode configuration. Impedance information may be used by the processor 210 for any of a variety of purposes (e.g., hardware condition, cardiac condition, edema, respiration, etc.). The processor 210 may store impedance or other information to memory 224 for later use or for transmission via the telemetry circuit 270.
The device 200 includes a power source, which is shown as a batter 280 in the example of
While the device 200 includes particular features, various exemplary devices, systems, methods, etc., may use or be implemented using a different device with more or less features.
A study by Taegtmeyer indicates that GLP-1 can dramatically improve left ventricular function, systemic and coronary flow hemodynamics in canines with advanced cardiomyopathy (“Cardiac Metabolism as a Target for the Treatment of Heart Failure”, Circulation 2004; 110: 894-896). Accordingly, the method 310 can treat human patients experiencing cardiomyopathy. Further, a study by Nikolaidis et al. (“Recombinant Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Increases Myocardial Glucose Uptake and Improves Left Ventricular Performance in Conscious Dogs With Pacing-Induced Dilated Cardiomyopathy” Circulation 2004 110: 955-961) indicates that administration of recombinant GLP-1 (rGLP-1) to canines with pacing induced dilated cardiomyopathy can improve left ventricular performance. Hence, the exemplary method 310 may be implemented in conjunction with a cardiac pacing therapy to reduce risk of pacing-related cardiomyopathy.
In a specific example, the diagnosis block 312 acquires impedance information related to ventricular myopathy and then makes a diagnosis based at least in part on the acquired information. In turn, the activation block 314 uses the diagnosis to appropriately time activation of a pathway to increase GLP-1 concentration. In this example, the activation block 314 may operate according to a schedule. A schedule may be based directly on acquired information or on a diagnosis (e.g., based on the acquired information).
The exemplary method 320 includes a detection block 322 that detects insufficient GLP-1 and an activation block 324 for activating a pathway to release GLP-1. The detection block 322 may detect levels of GLP-1 directly or indirectly. For example, plasma gGLI concentration can be used as an indicator of GLP-1 concentration. Thus, the detection block 322 may rely on one or more gGLI concentration measurements. The method 320 can act to maintain a particular GLP-1 blood concentration or gastrointestinal concentration. In some instances, GLP-1 set point may be dependent on time of day or patient activity. In such instances, the activation block 324 may act by comparing a determined GLP-1 concentration to a set point concentration where the set point depends on one or more other variables. A concentration that is below a set point can be considered a low concentration. In general, a low concentration is a concentration less than a desired concentration.
While the detection block 322 refers to GLP-1, in another example, a detection block may detect blood glucose and use blood glucose (e.g., concentration) to determine insufficiency of GLP-1. Further, while the detection block 322 mentions insufficiency, an exemplary method may call for action where GLP-1 sufficiency exists (e.g., to prohibit delivery of energy to a pathway, to call for an adjustment to a cardiac pacing therapy, etc.).
The exemplary method 330 includes a detection block 332 that detects a need for increased cardiac output and an activation block 334 that activates a pathway for release of GLP-1. The method 330 can include detecting a need for increased cardiac output and calling for delivery of energy to the distal ileum to activate L cells using an implantable device where activation of L cells causes release of GLP-1 and where release of GLP-1 increases cardiac output. In general, such a method includes activating vagal nerves, K cells and/or L cells using an implantable device to induce, directly or indirectly, release of GLP-1 to increase cardiac output.
The aforementioned study by Nikolaidis et al. states that 48 hours of infusion of GLP-1 can increase cardiac output up to 27%. More specifically, the Nikolaidis study found that rGLP-1 significantly increased LV systolic pressure by about 9 mm Hg and LV dP/dt by about 960 mm Hg/s while reducing the LV end-diastolic pressure and heart rate. The Nikolaidis study also found that rGLP-1 significantly increased LV ejection fraction (from 28±1% to 38±5%), SV (14±3 mL), and CO (548±39 mL/min) while lowering systemic vascular resistance.
In a specific example, the detection block 332 acquires left atrial pressure information related to cardiac output (e.g., using a left atrial pressure sensor). In turn, the activation block 334 uses the detected information appropriately time activation of a pathway to increase GLP-1 concentration. In this example, the activation block 334 may operate according to a schedule. A schedule may be based directly on acquired information. For example, where left atrial pressure falls below a set point pressure (i.e., a low pressure for purpose of control), the activation block 334 may call for delivery of energy to a pathway for release of GLP-1 where the delivery occurs over a period of time according to a schedule. In another example, the delivery of energy may be adaptively adjusted based on left atrial pressure or other cardiac output information (e.g., on a beat-by-beat or another substantially instantaneous basis).
The exemplary method 340 includes a detection block 342 for detecting infarction or ischemia and an activation block 344 for activating a pathway for release of GLP-1. A study by Bose et al. (“Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Can Directly Protect the Heart Against Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury”, Diabetes, Vol. 54, January 2005) found that for induced ischemia in rats, GLP-1 infusion reduced infarct size by about 23%. In the method 340, the detection block 342 may detect infarct or ischemia by any of a variety of techniques and then trigger the activation block 344 to activate a pathway to increase GLP-1 concentration. The activation block 344 may operate according to a schedule, for example, based on severity of the cardiac event (e.g., magnitude, location, etc.).
In a particular example, the detection block 342 acquires temperature information using one or more temperature sensors positioned to measure blood and/or myocardial temperature. For example, a lead with temperature sensors may be positioned in the coronary sinus and/or its contributory vessels. In this example, an abnormal temperature or temperature differential may indicate that ischemia exists or that an infarct occurred. Accordingly, the activation block 344 may act to increase GLP-1 blood concentration. In another example, the detection block 342 acquires one or more intracardiac electrograms (IEGMs) and analyzes such information to decide whether an infarct or ischemic event occurred. The activation block 344 may then act accordingly to increase GLP-1 blood concentration.
Accordingly, the method 340 can diminish long-term myocardial damage caused by an infarct or ischemia by detecting an infarct or ischemia and delivering energy to a site using an implantable device where activation at the site causes release of GLP-1 and where release of GLP-1 diminishes long-term myocardial damage caused by an infarct or ischemia. Such a method may deliver energy to one or more sites. For example, a method may deliver energy to one or more of a duodenal site, an ileum site, a vagal site, etc., as explained with respect to
Various studies refer to a “brain-gut axis” as a primary mechanism for metabolic control. A review by Konturek et al., “Brain-gut Axis and Its Role in the Control of Food Intake”, J. Physiol. Pharma. 2004, 55, 1, 137-154, recognizes that the gastrointestinal system or “tract” (GIT) interacts with the central nervous system (CNS) and the enteric nervous system (ENS) where the CNS and ENS form the brain-gut axis.
The ENS includes specific innervations and plexuses associated with the GIT. For example, the GIT includes a myenteric plexus known as the Auerbach plexus and a submucous plexus known as the Meissner plexus. These plexuses are primarily associated with parasympathetic aspects of the autonomic nervous system. The Auerbach plexus is located between the longitudinal and circular layers of muscle in the tunica muscularis (generally from pylorus 426 to duodenum 428) and relates generally to tonic and rhythmic contractions. The Meissner plexus is buried in the submucosa and relates to epithelial cell function and GIT blood flow. Another plexus, the celiac plexus is associated primarily with sympathetic aspects of the autonomic nervous system, however, some vagal innervation exists as well as other innervation.
As already inferred, interactions exist between these ENS plexuses and the autonomic nervous system, in particular, a vagal pathway and a splanchnic path exist between the CNS and the ENS. The parasympathetic vagal pathway includes cholingeric nerves (about 80% to 90% unmyelinated C-fibers) while the sympathetic splanchnic pathway includes noradrenergic nerves. Regarding interactions, consider that the Valsalva maneuver, commonly associated with parasympathetic activation, as well as increasing intraabdominal pressure (e.g., squat position) can increase normal defecation.
With respect to more specific routes of autonomic innervation, more generally, vaso-vagal reflexes include sensory vagal afferents, second-order integrative neurons of the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) and efferent vagal neurons of the dorsal or posterior motor nucleus (DMN). Various studies indicate that the left vagus supplies efferent preganglionic fibers mainly to the anterior surface of the stomach (also known as the anterior vagus) and that the right vagus supplies efferent preganglionic fibers mainly to the posterior surface of the stomach (also known as the posterior vagus). For example, with reference to the diagram 400 of
The celiac plexus 462 is a junction for autonomic nerves supplying the upper abdominal organs (liver 410, gall bladder 497, spleen, stomach 420, pancreas 490, kidneys, small bowel 432, and about two-thirds of the large bowel or colon 435). The celiac plexus 462 proper consists of the celiac ganglia with a network of interconnecting fibers. The aorticorenal ganglia are often considered to be part of the celiac ganglia, and thus, part of the plexus. The celiac plexus 462 receives sympathetic nerves from the greater splanchnic nerve (around T5/6 to T9/10 vertebrae), the lesser splanchnic nerve (around T10/11 vertebrae) and the least splanchnic nerve (around T11/12 vertebrae). As already mentioned, the upper abdominal organs receive their parasympathetic supply from the left and right vagal trunks which pass through the celiac plexus 462.
The brain-gut axis also relies on afferent signals from the GIT and other organs. Afferent signals from the upper GIT are transmitted by the vagi, splanchnic mesenteric nerves, and pelvic afferents. Together, these afferent nerves provide the peripheral extrinsic neural part of the gut-brain axis. The upper GIT is largely innervated by vagal afferents; the pelvic afferents are limited to the lower or large bowel, while splanchnic afferents innervate much of the GIT. The intrinsic, enteric neural systems such as the myenteric and submucosal plexuses (Auerbach and Meissner) may mediate between GIT mucosal and muscular events and extrinsic neural signaling.
The vagus nerve consists of both sensory and motor axons. In the periphery, as already mentioned, the vagus enters the abdomen with two trunks (the right, dorsal or posterior and the left, ventral or anterior) that track generally along the esophagus. When the vagi cross the diaphragm, in most individuals they divide into five distinctive branches: (i-ii) paired gastric branches (e.g., associated with the stomach and the proximal duodenum), (iii-iv) paired celiac branches (e.g., associated with duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum and colon) and (v) a single hepatic branch that originates from the ventral trunk (e.g., associated with distal antrum, duodenum, liver and gall bladder).
With respect to the diagram 400 of
With respect to the heart 470, various autonomic pathways are discussed in an article by Kawashima (“The autonomic nervous system of the human heart with special reference to its origin, course, and peripheral distribution”, Anat Embryol. (2005) 209: 425-438) and an article by Pauza et al. (“Morphology, distribution, and variability of the epicardiac neural ganglionated subplexuses in the human heart”, The Anatomical Record (2000) 259(4): 353-382). The article by Kawashima presents various nerve pathways including parasympathetic cardiac branches arising from vagus nerve. The Kawashima article categorizes vagal cardiac branches with direct connections or connections via the cardiac plexus, excluding branches of the lung or surrounding vessels and organs, as follows: superior cardiac branch, which arose from the vagus nerve at about the level of the upper (proximal) portion of the recurrent laryngeal nerve branch inferior cardiac branch, which arose from the recurrent laryngeal nerve branch; and thoracic cardiac branch, which arose from the vagus nerve at about the level of the lower (distal) portion of the recurrent laryngeal nerve branch.
According to Kawashima, the cardiac plexus includes the right cardiac plexus, which usually surrounds the brachiocephalic trunk (also known as the innominate artery), and the left cardiac plexus, which surrounds the aortic arch. On the right side, several autonomic nerves were observed passing through the dorsal, rather than the ventral, aspect of the aortic arch while, on the left side, no differences between the ventral and dorsal courses to the aortic arch were observed.
Various nerves identified in the Kawashima article extend to one or more epicardial autonomic plexuses, also referred to herein as subplexuses. The aforementioned article by Pauza et al., reports that the epicardial plexus includes seven subplexuses: (I) left coronary, (II) right coronary, (III) ventral right atrial, (IV) ventral left atrial, (V) left dorsal, (VI) middle dorsal, and (VII) dorsal right atrial. The Pauza article states that, in general, the human right atrium is innervated by two subplexuses (III, VII), the left atrium by three subplexuses (IV, V, VI), the right ventricle by one subplexus (II), and the left ventricle by three subplexuses (I, V, VI).
Various autonomic pathways associated with the cardiopulmonary system innervate the heart 470 (e.g., cardiac subplexuses), the brain 480, the lungs 475, and baroreceptors (e.g., such as those associated with the aortic arch). While some parasympathetic pathways may operate without direct communication to the brain 480, the brain often activates efferent pathways and receives information via afferent pathways.
As parasympathetic pathways connect with various organs, more than one type of nerve activity exists for communication along such parasympathetic pathways. Further, the specific type of activity may, by itself, identify an associated mechanism or group of mechanisms. For example, sensing of high velocity nerve activity may indicate that respiratory and/or baroreceptor mechanisms are involved. A classification method may optionally rely on sensing nerve activity and determining the type of nerve activity (e.g., velocity, frequency or other characteristics) to then classify the activity as associated with a mechanism or organ. Classification may occur based at least in part on one or more other types of information. For example, electrocardiogram, impedance and pressure information may be used for purposes of classifying nerve activity.
The incretin effect, defined by a significantly greater insulin stimulatory effect evoked after an oral glucose load than that evoked from an intravenous glucose infusion when plasma glucose concentrations are matched, was first described in the 1960s. Although other hormones may take part in the incretin effect, the majority of the effect is due to glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and GLP-1. Patients with type 2 diabetes have a significant reduction of the incretin effect, implying that these patients either have decreased concentration of the incretin hormones, or a resistance to their effects. GLP-1 concentrations are reduced in patients with type 2 diabetes in response to a meal, while GIP concentrations are either normal or increased, suggesting a resistance to the actions of GIP thus making GLP-1 a more logical target for therapeutic intervention.
The incretin effect is estimated to be responsible for about 50% to about 70% of the insulin response to glucose. As already mentioned, in patients with type 2 diabetes, the incretin effect is diminished or absent. This reduction in the incretin effect is due in part to a partial reduction in postprandial GLP-1 secretion and a substantial reduction in the insulinotropic activity of GIP. The incretin effect causes a fairly rapid increase in plasma insulin, usually within about the first 30 minutes after ingestion of glucose. Patients with type 2 diabetes may eventually reach a similar plasma insulin value after, for example, at about 120 minutes.
Referring to the activation blocks 314, 324, 334 and 344 of
The hormone GIP can enhance secretion of GLP-1. GIP is secreted by so-called “K” cells in the proximal duodenum, under some degree of control by enteric cholinergic neurons. Delivery of electrical energy to K cells can cause release of GIP. In turn, GIP acts to increase release of GLP-1.
Referring again to
Evidence based on anterograde tracing after injections into the individual subdiaphragmatic vagal branches show discrete, yet somewhat overlapping, NTS termination fields for each vagal branch. Thus, the NTS contains viscerotopic and at least some information specific to a particular vagus branch. As already discussed, the hepatic branch of the anterior vagus includes branches that supply other regions. Other branches also exist and lead to the antrum, the duodenum, and the cecum, which is consistent with the general notion that individual gut vagal branches innervate multiple GIT segments.
With respect to efferent nerves, various efferent nerves project from the DMN, a structure just anterior of the NTS. The DMN contains numerous dendrites penetrating the NTS and the Area Postrema (AP). About 95% of preganglionic neurons in the DMN contribute to projections to the stomach suggesting that the efferent part of the vagus nerve is highly involved in the motor innervation of the stomach. Anterograde tracers injected into the DMN have been shown to label up to 100% of the myenteric ganglia in the stomach, 96% in the duodenum, 40% in the jejunum, 66% in cecum, 16% in the descending colon, and 0% in the rectum.
The posterior vagus appears to have more efferent character while the anterior vagus appears to have more afferent character with respect to the GIT. Hence, as in the afferent projections, each vagal branch contains the axons of a topographically distinct column of cells within the DMN. Therefore, the afferent-efferent viscerotopic and branch specific organization of the vagus likely reflects distinct neurophysiological reflexes and functions involved in digestion. Such an organization may be used to further the goals of various exemplary techniques discussed herein.
Vagal afferents appear to be sensitive to a variety of stimuli. Different populations of vagal afferents with terminations in the GIT indicate different sensory modalities, for example, reaction to mechanical as well as chemical stimulation. More specifically, vagal endings in the longitudinal and circular muscle layers are also defined as intramuscular arrays (IMAs) and have been suggested to be in-series tension receptors (e.g., mechanical sensors).
Vagal afferents in the myenteric plexus (Auerbach) throughout the GIT are called intraganglionic laminar endings (IGLEs) and exhibit characteristics of a tension receptor. Thus, evidence indicates that vagal afferent fibers play a role in volume detection of the stomach and gut, which may contribute to the process of satiation. This role is supported by neurophysiological studies that link the vagus to the process of satiation and meal termination.
With respect to the paired celiac branches of the vagus, motor fibers of the accessory celiac and celiac vagal branches are derived from the lateral columns of the DMN. These branches also contain sensory fibers that terminate within the NTS. Studies on rats report that tracer injections of the duodenum labeled a small number of the cells within the medial aspects of the DMN, that jejunal, ileal, and ascending colon injections labeled cells sparsely within the lateral aspects of the DMN bilaterally, that cecal injections caused prominent retrograde labeling of cell bodies bilaterally in the lateral columns of the DMN above, at, and below the level of the area postrema and that no afferent terminal labeling was evident after injection of these areas of the bowel.
Studies in humans (see, e.g., Wettergren et al., The inhibitory effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) 7-36 amide on gastric acid secretion in humans depends on an intact vagal innervation”, Gut 1997;40;597-601) report that GLP-1 does not act directly on the gastric mucosa, but interacts with vagal pathways (e.g., receptors associated with vagal afferents, central nervous sites, or transmission in vagal efferents). The study of Wettergren reported that GLP-1 probably does not interfere with vagal efferent transmission at the level of the parasympathetic ganglia and that GLP-1 released from the small intestine could reach the brain via leaks in the blood-brain barrier.
Studies indicate that both vagal and spinal afferent pathways play a role in mediating nutrient-specific information from the GIT. Vagal afferent pathways transmit information about protein/amino acids (AAs), lipids, and carbohydrates (hexoses); for the latter, the vagal afferents seem to be in the accessory celiac branch of the vagus. In addition, spinal afferents transmit information for hexoses, but not necessarily for lipids, via the celiac plexus and the dorsal root ganglion (or spinal ganglion). Activation of both spinal and vagal afferent fibers results in alteration of autonomic efferent outflow to alter secretory and motor function of the GIT.
Rocca and Brubaker suggest that secretion of GLP-1 from the distal L cell is intimately connected with the presence of nutrients in the proximal duodenum through an interaction of neural and endocrine pathways. Rocca and Brubaker performed electrical stimulation of the celiac branch of the vagus nerve in rats to determine whether the efferent vagus nerve mediates the signal from the proximal duodenum to the distal L cells. The plot 502 shows responses of plasma gGLI (as difference from basal) to electrical stimulation of the distal end of the celiac branch of the vagus nerve. The electrical stimulation used a potential of 10 V at a frequency of 20 Hz for a period of 15 minutes. Rocca and Brubaker also suggest that the enteric nervous system is not responsible for relaying information about nutrient intake to the ileal L cells. They further suggest that local afferents could possibly branch from vagal afferents that innervate the duodenal region and travel to the ileum within the walls of the gastrointestinal tract (see dashed line for enteric nerves, which may include local vagal afferents) to exert effects on gGLI secretion in a reflex manner. Thus, multiple mechanisms may exist for transmission of information (e.g., “global” and local).
Before discussing various exemplary methods for inducing release of GLP-1, various chemical messengers (GIP, GLP-1, insulin and glucagons) are discussed in more detail. GIP, also known as gastric inhibitory polypeptide, or glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, is a 42 amino acid peptide hormone synthesized in and secreted from K cells in the intestinal epithelium. The majority of intestinal K cells are located in the proximal duodenum. GIP secretion is primarily regulated by nutrients, especially fats. GIP exhibits potent incretin activity in rodents and human subjects. Unlike GLP-1, which exerts multiple non-incretin activities in the regulation of blood glucose, the primary action of GIP is the stimulation of glucose-dependent insulin secretion. GIP may also play a role in adipocyte biology. The site of GIP expression, the gut endocrine K cell, possess features for sensing nutrient intake and secreting GIP following nutrient intake. GIP has been shown to stimulate beta cell proliferation synergistically with glucose in the islet INS-1 cell line. Thus, potential exists for use of GIP in combination with GLP-1 for initiating islet regeneration in the setting of islet injury or decrease beta cell mass. GIP receptors are expressed on adipocytes.
GLP-1 is an incretin that is essential for normal glucose tolerance and is a product of proglucagon that is secreted by specialized intestinal endocrine cells (L cells) after meals. The majority of circulating biologically active GLP-1 is found in the GLP-1(7-36) amide form, with lesser amounts of the bioactive GLP-1(7-37) form also detectable. It is the first insulinotropic GI hormone to be identified that is effective in diabetic as well as nondiabetic persons. The effect of GLP-1 to lower blood glucose is likely due to effects on several processes, including gastric motility, food intake, and possibly glucose production and/or glucose uptake, as well as islet hormone secretion (e.g., insulin). Studies suggest that GLP-1 is involved in the regulation of beta cell mass, for example, GLP-1 signaling appears to regulate islet proliferation and islet neogenesis (e.g., can cause beta cell proliferation). At least some of these processes appear to be mediated through visceral neural pathways (e.g., at least gastric emptying and satiety).
Various studies show that GLP-1 enters the blood and acts on the nervous system and the pancreas. GLP-1 stimulates insulin secretion from beta cells in the pancreas in a glucose-dependent manner when the glucose concentration is elevated, an effect that declines as glucose concentration returns toward normal. GLP-1 also acts via the nervous system to affect the pancreas. Insulin, as discussed below, acts to reduce glucose output by the liver and acts to increase uptake by muscle, including the myocardium. GLP-1 increases glycogenesis by the liver and muscle, a process of glycogen synthesis, in which glucose molecules are added to chains of glycogen. GLP-1 also acts to increase lipogenesis, a collective, complex process of producing lipids (fatty acids) from smaller precursor molecules such as glucose.
As GLP-1 can cause a decrease in glucose, it may indirectly increase release of somatostatin, which acts to suppress release of gastrointestinal hormones (e.g., gastrin, CCK, secretin, motilin, GIP, etc.), lowers the rate of gastric emptying and reduces smooth muscle contractions and blood flow within the intestine, suppress the release of pancreatic hormones (inhibits release of insulin and glucagon) and suppress the exocrine secretory action of pancreas.
GLP-1 has four main actions referred to as (i) pancreas insulin-related, (ii) glucagon secretion, (iii) satiety and (iv) gastric-related. Pancreas insulin-related action includes various actions discussed with respect to the schematic 501 where GLP-1 is released by L cells and acts on beta cells in proportion to the amount of glucose sensed by L cells.
The beta cells of the Islets of Langerhans of the pancreas produce insulin. Circulating insulin levels increase upon food intake and are proportional to body fat. Insulin promotes transport of glucose from the circulatory system into tissues, stimulates uptake of glucose and deposition of glycogen in the liver, decreases release of glucose by the liver, decreases food intake and increases energy expenditure via action on the hypothalamus and/or hindbrain.
Glucagon is a hormone that causes the release of glucose from the liver in order to maintain normal glucose homeostasis during fasting and is an important protective mechanism against hypoglycemia. Conversely, glucagon secretion is suppressed during periods of hyperglycemia. GLP-1 suppresses glucagon secretion from alpha cells in the pancreas in a glucose-dependent manner where more specifically it suppresses glucagon secretion in the fed state (noting during hypoglycemia, glucagon suppression does not occur). However, in patients with type 2 diabetes, glucagon concentrations are often inappropriately elevated, resulting in increased hepatic glucose output and postprandial glucose excursions.
With respect to satiety, the central nervous system is a critical site for regulating food intake, satiety, and body weight. GLP-1 works on the brain to trigger a feeling of satiety and reduce food intake.
With respect to gastric emptying, the rate of gastric emptying is a key determinant of the rate of nutrient absorption, an important factor in postprandial glucose excursions. GLP-1 slows the rate of gastric emptying, which in turn slows the delivery and absorption of nutrients in the small intestine and thereby limits the rate at which carbohydrate is absorbed into the circulation. The rate of gastric emptying is often increased in patients with type 2 diabetes, causing a rapid rise in postprandial blood glucose.
Type 2 diabetes is associated with an imbalance of beta cell response and beta cell workload. The response diminishes while workload increases. GLP-1 causes proliferation of beta cells and hence may prove more beneficial as a therapeutic approach when compared to therapies that use or propose electrical pancreas stimulation alone.
The exemplary method 610 includes a stimulation block 614 and a release block 616. Accordingly, the stimulation block 614 may directly stimulate L cells to thereby cause release of GLP-1, per the release block 616. With respect to direct L cell stimulation, general stimulation of adrenergic receptors stimulates secretory activity of ileal endocrine L cells where secretion results from the activation of the beta2-isoreceptor type. Additionally, GLP-1 secretions are positively modulated by alpha1-receptor stimulation and inhibited by alpha2-receptor activation upon beta-receptor occupation. While various techniques include delivery of electrical energy, an exemplary method may deliver a chemical to stimulate L cells.
The exemplary method 620 includes a stimulation block 622 for stimulation of vagal efferents. In turn, vagal efferents activate L cells 624 and L cells release GLP-1. The stimulation block 622 may stimulate vagal efferents at any of a variety of locations. Such stimulation may be via delivery of electrical energy directly to vagal efferents. As shown in the schematic 501 of
The exemplary method 630 includes a stimulation block 632 for stimulation of local enteric nerves. In turn, the enteric nerves activate L cells 634, which then release GLP-1 636. Rocca and Brubaker state that mechanisms that stimulate early secretion of GLP-1 may also be mediated through the enteric nervous system in the walls of the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, the method 630 may be used to induce the release of GLP-1 or to mediate the release of GLP-1.
The exemplary method 640 includes a stimulation block 642 for stimulation of vagal afferents. The stimulation block 642 may stimulate vagal afferents at any of a variety of locations. Such stimulation may be via delivery of electrical energy directly to vagal afferents. As shown in the schematic 501 of
The exemplary method 650 includes a stimulation block 652 to directly stimulate K cells. In turn, the K cells release GIP 654, which acts on vagal afferents 656. As already described, the vagal afferents cause vagal efferent activity 658 that acts on L cells 660, which release GLP-1 662. Various GIP secretagogues exist. Glucose, protein hydrolysates, specific amino acids, and fat stimulate GIP release by K cells. Further, GRP, a hormone produced and secreted by enteric neurons, also stimulates GIP release. Conversely, somatostatin (SST) inhibits secretion from gut K cells. While various techniques include delivery of electrical energy, an exemplary method may deliver a chemical to stimulate K cells.
While the method 650 pertains to a vagal afferent/efferent pathway for inducing release of GLP-1, GIP released by K cell stimulation may act in a more direct manner as indicated by the dotted line in the schematic 501 of
The structure of the intestinal wall is not consistent throughout the entire small intestine. The duodenum 428 contains a thick wall, with deeply folded mucous membrane and duodenal digestive glands. The foldings are called the “folds of Kerckring”. They are well developed both in the duodenum 428 and in the jejunum 433. The jejunum 433 has a thicker wall and is more vasculated than the duodenum 428. Furthermore, it has larger and more villi than the ileum 434. The ileum 434 has more lymphatic follicles than elsewhere in the intestine.
The small intestine has various layers including an outer layer referred to as the serosa and inner layers (e.g., muscularis, submucosa and mucosa). The myenteric plexus (plexus of Auerbach) is generally in the muscularis between a longitudinal layer of muscle and a circular layer of muscle.
While the scenarios 106 and 108 of shown in
The exemplary scheme 900 may be modified as appropriate. For example, where energy delivery occurs at 40 Hz for 15 minutes, the energy delivery may be further subdivided such as small bursts of 2 seconds on and then 2 seconds off, as opposed to continuous delivery at 40 Hz for the full 15 minutes. Thus, energy delivery may be characterized in terms of “on/off” times (e.g., “2 s/2 s”), which may cycle continually during an active therapy window (e.g., the 15 minute window) while energy delivery does not occur during an inactive window (e.g., the 45 minute window). Use of “on/off” times may occur for physiologic reasons. Where sensing occurs, such times may be optimized optionally together with active therapy window and/or inactive therapy window durations.
The scheme 900 may be implemented as control logic 230 of an implantable device 200 that may include a lead 910 with a series of electrodes 912 positionable at any of a variety of sites (e.g., digestive track sites, nerve sites, muscle sites, etc.). A lead optionally includes a branch or branches that may allow for positioning at least one electrode at a proximal digestive track site and at least one electrode at another site (e.g., a distal digestive track site, a nerve site, a muscle site, etc.). A lead optionally includes a branch or branches that may allow for positioning at least one electrode at a distal digestive track site and at least one electrode at another site (e.g., a proximal digestive track site, a nerve site, a muscle site, etc.).
Exemplary stimulation parameters are shown in Table I and may be, for example, of active biphasic or passive biphasic pulse morphology.
With respect to charge density, limits may be imposed, for example, to not exceed about 100 μc/cm2 charge density delivery to the tissue.
Table 2, below, provides examples of delivery schemes (S1 through S7) with reference to proximal site activation and distal site activation for various times (Time 1 through Time 4). The scheme S1 delivers energy in a manner that aims to primarily activate a proximal site (“P”) while the scheme S2 delivers energy in a manner that aims to primarily activate a distal site (“D”). In contrast, schemes S3-S7 deliver energy in a manner that aims to activate both a proximal site and a distal site (“P+D”). In these examples, a proximal site may correspond to a site of the duodenum 428 as shown in
As noted in schemes S4-S7, energy may be delivered in a manner that aims to activate both a proximal site and a distal site at a particular time. Overall, if a method aims to affect, at some point in time, the muscles only, then a delivery scheme may be selected that minimizes its effect on C-fibers. Such a method may aim to reduce activation of C-fibers by reducing charge density delivered per pulse. In particular, the pulse width of the energy may be limited to a short duration (e.g., about 1 ms). Further, a delivery scheme that reduces charge density can reduce tissue damage. Selective activation can enhance control or effectiveness of various schemes.
As already mentioned, a site may be selected to activate/inhibit tissue activity (e.g., L cells, K cells, muscle, nerve, etc.). For example,
Myelinated fibers are typically larger, conduct faster and have very low stimulation thresholds, compared to the unmyelinated type. Further, less energy is typically required to stimulate myelinated fibers, which exhibit a particular strength-duration curve that may relate to response for a given pulse width versus amplitude. In general, A and B group fibers can be stimulated with relatively narrow pulse widths (e.g., typically less than 1 ms). With respect to conduction, A group fibers conduct slightly faster than B group fibers and typically exhibit a slightly lower activation threshold. C group fibers are very small, conduct electrical signals very slowly, and have higher stimulation thresholds typically requiring a wider pulse width and higher amplitude for activation when compared to A and B group fibers. Hence, selective stimulation of only A and B group fibers may be achieved given appropriate equipment.
An exemplary method optionally includes control logic to classify sensed nerve activity where such classification may rely on groups such as A, B and C, myelinated/unmyelinated, etc. Activation of a nerve may rely on such classification. Activation may aim to transmit a signal or to block or inhibit a signal.
As described herein, inhibition or blocking of signals of a vagus nerve may be used for treating or controlling a metabolic disorder and/or treating a cardiac condition. Activation of a vagal nerve is accompanied by generation of a signal or signals, assuming the nerve or nerve fibers is/are not in a refractory phase. Some GIT signals are carried by C-fibers, which become refractory if stimulated at high frequency (e.g., about 40 Hz or higher) for more than a period of 30 to 60 seconds. Thus, an exemplary method may aim to inhibit or block C-fiber transmission by through use of a scheme that delivers energy using a high frequency with a certain “on” time followed by an “off” time (e.g., consider about 300 seconds on followed by about 20 seconds). This scheme could be repeated for the interval of time that control (blocking of the C-fiber information) is desired to be exercised.
An alternative scheme may consider that C-fibers become refractory if stimulated for a sufficiently long period. Thus, an alternative scheme may continuously stimulate the C-fibers to render them refractory and thereby block nerve signal transmission. Again, various GIT signals are carried by C-fibers, hence, such blocking schemes may be appropriate on a continuous, a periodic or an as desired/needed basis (e.g., in response to an event, a signal, a schedule, etc.). C-fibers conduct more slowly than A and B-fibers; an exemplary scheme may account for such conduction differences, particularly when blocking certain C-fiber signals.
As described herein, where an exemplary method aims to activate tissue other than C-fibers, a delivery scheme can optionally use energy delivery parameters that aim to minimize effect on C-fibers. Such a scheme may, for example, minimize pain associated with C-fibers, accommodation or adaptation of C-fibers, etc. A shorter pulse width (and phase width) reduces activation of C-fibers while a sufficient duty cycle may ensures activation of target tissue (e.g., K cells, L cells, etc.) for purposes of treating a metabolic disorder and/or a cardiac condition.
The method 1000 uses the acquired information in a decision block 1008 that decides if the cardiac condition is OK. In an alternative method, the acquired information may be an alert that already indicates that cardiac condition is not OK. If the decision block 1008 decides that the cardiac condition is OK, then the method 1000 returns to the acquisition block 1004 or takes other appropriate action (e.g., according to a schedule, sensed information, transmitted information, etc.). However, if the decision block 1008 decides that the cardiac condition is not OK, then a call block 1012 calls for delivery of energy to a vagal pathway and/or enteric nerve pathway to increase GLP-1. As already mentioned, GLP-1 can have beneficial effects on cardiac condition and/or cardiac performance.
The method 1100 uses the acquired information in a decision block 1108 that decides if a need for an increase in GLP-1 exists. In an alternative method, the acquired information may be an alert that already indicates that a need for an increase in GLP-1 exists. If the decision block 1108 decides that a need does not exist, then the method 1100 returns to the acquisition block 1104 or takes other appropriate action (e.g., according to a schedule, sensed information, transmitted information, etc.). However, if the decision block 1108 decides that a need exists for an increase in GLP-1, then a call block 1112 calls for delivery of energy to a vagal pathway and/or enteric nerve pathway to increase GLP-1. As already mentioned, GLP-1 can have beneficial effects on cardiac condition and/or cardiac performance. GLP-1 also has beneficial effects on diseases such as type 2 diabetes. An exemplary method optionally treats cardiac condition and treats a metabolic condition such as type 2 diabetes.
The methods 1000 and 1100 may be suitable implemented using various scenarios 102, 104, 106 and 108 of
As already mentioned with respect to Table 2, a method may include calling for coordinated delivery of energy to the duodenum and to the distal ileum (e.g., simultaneous, alternating, according to a schedule, etc.). Coordinated delivery may be tailored to a specific individual based on information acquired during a clinical examination, acquired via feedback (e.g., sensing or patient input), etc., and hence operate according to closed-loop or open-loop control. Coordinated delivery of energy can optionally occur according to a schedule in a manner that aims to cause secretion of GLP-1 at particular times of the day (e.g., as associated with patient activity, biological cycles, feeding, etc.). For example, an exemplary device can include a timer that triggers events according to a programmed schedule. A care provider may program such a device via an implantable device programmer. A patient may be signaled by an implantable device or by an external device to coordinate patient behavior with programmed action of the implantable device.
While various methods pertain to cardiac therapies, an exemplary method optionally treats a metabolic disorder in addition to treating a cardiac condition. A method that treats a metabolic disorder may include calling for delivery of energy to a portion of the intestine to cause secretion of GIP and calling for delivery of energy to a more distal portion of the intestine to cause secretion of GLP-1. In such a method the portion of the intestine may be a portion of the duodenum or jejunum and the more distal portion of the intestine may be a portion of the ileum. Such a method may call for delivery of energy in response to an event or receipt of information. For example, calling for delivery of energy to the portion to cause secretion of GIP may occur in response to detecting digestion of food (e.g., food intake) and/or calling for delivery of energy to the more distal portion to cause secretion of GLP-1 may occur in response to detecting digestion of food (e.g., food intake). A method may call for delivery of energy in response to detecting a high in vivo concentration of glucose (e.g., a gastrointestinal concentration or a blood concentration).
Various exemplary methods may include vagal activation. For example, an exemplary method may include calling for delivery of energy to a portion of the duodenum to activate vagal afferents where the vagal afferents cause secretion of GLP-1. An exemplary method may also activate local, intestinal nerves (see, e.g., mechanism described with respect to
As already mentioned, various methods may be implemented using one or more implantable devices. For example, an exemplary implantable device may include a processor and one or more computer-readable media with processor executable instructions to call for delivery of energy to the duodenum to activate K cells using an implantable device and to call for delivery of energy to the distal ileum to activate L cells using an implantable device where delivery of such energy causes, directly or indirectly, secretion of GLP-1.
Although exemplary mechanisms (e.g., implemented as or in methods, devices, systems, software, etc.) have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described.
This application is related to the following co-pending U.S. patent application Serial Nos.: ______, filed May 31, 2007, Atty. Dkt. No. A07P1094, entitled “Energy Delivery to the Gastric System for Treating Metabolic Disorders;” ______, filed May 31, 2007, Atty. Dkt. No. A07P1094US01, entitled “Energy Delivery to the Gastric System for Treating Metabolic Disorders;” ______, filed May 31, 2007, Atty. Dkt. No. A07P1095, entitled “Treatment of Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure and Cardiac Ischemia using Stimulation Induced Secretion of GLP-1;” ______, filed May 31, 2007, Atty. Dkt. No. A07P1095US01, entitled “Treatment of Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure and Cardiac Ischemia using Stimulation Induced Secretion of GLP-1;” ______, filed May 31, 2007, Atty. Dkt. No. A07P1095US03, entitled “Treatment of Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure and Cardiac Ischemia using Stimulation Induced Secretion of GLP-1;” and ______, filed May 31, 2007, Atty. Dkt. No. A07P1098, entitled “Techniques to Monitor and Trend Nerve Damage and Recovery.”