This invention relates to the treatment of crude oils or petroleum products to extract heavy metals and sulfur resulting in a crude oils or petroleum products which is readily refined in conventional oil refineries or resulting in the crude oils or petroleum products able to be used in industry and transportation without causing environmental damage.
Studies have been made about the distribution and possible structure of heavy metals in petroleum products such as “Mechanism of Occurrence of Metals in Petroleum Distillates” R. A. Woodle and W. B. Chandler, Jr, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, v.44, No.11, Nov. 1952, p. 2591. More recently, Energy BioSystems Corporation of Woodlands, Tex., USA (“Recent Advances in Biodesulfurization of Diesel Fuel” 1999 Annual General Meeting, National Petrochemical and Refiners Association, Mar. 21–23, 1999, San Antonio, Tex., USA) have claimed success in removing sulfur from petroleum products by biodesulfurisation using a microbe. This process deals only with sulfur and the microbes have problems with removing some type of sulfur compounds such as 4,6 dimethyl dibenzothiopene; further, there is a by-product hydrocarbon compound which Energy BioSystems believe can be used as a surfactant base material. BioSystems suggest that their process would combine well with conventional hydro-desulfurisation in removing sulfur from petroleum products by pre-conditioning the petroleum product with their biodesulfurisation.
The conventional commercial method to remove sulfur usually from the residual of a distillation column is known as hydro-desulfurization. This is usually carried out at a high temperature of about 427 C with hydrogen gas applied to the charge. Catalyst such as cobalt and molybdenum on alumina are used to enhance the reaction.
Conventional hydro-desulfurization can not be applied to crude oil because the high temperature required will shift the TBP curve to the light end and produce low value gas and petroleum products. For similar reason, hydro-desulfurization of petroleum products such as automotive diesel would affect the desired quality of the petroleum product.
Kirkbride, C. G. was granted U.S. Pat. No. 4,234,402 (Nov. 18, 1980) for removing sulfur from coal and crude petroleum by applying microwaves to petroleum crude oils at room temperature but 1000 psig pressure of hydrogen. On a petroleum fraction obtained between the boiling point range of 400 to 500 degrees Fahrenheit containing 0.1% sulfur, Kirkbride obtained a sulfur removal of 86% by applying 1000 megacycles of microwave for 40 seconds. Applying microwaves under the same conditions but for 60 seconds on a crude sample containing 7% sulfur, Kirkbride was able to remove about 93% of the sulfur. Kirkbride preferred a batch system for his process which is a major disadvantage as continuous large capacity through-put processes are required by the oil industry. This is probably the main reason why Kirkbride's process was not adopted by the oil industry in spite of Kirkbride's subsequent U.S. Pat. No. 4,279,722 dealing with the use of microwaves in petroleum refining. Kirkbride's use of low temperature is a disadvantage as the applicants experimental observations indicate that microwaves are more efficient at higher temperatures. This is important where the crude oil sample contains sulfur compounds which are difficult to remove.
Nadkami et al were granted U.S. Pat. No. 4,408,999 (Oct. 11, 1983) concerning beneficiation of coal, oil shale, and similar carbonaceous solids to remove inorganic constituents by subjecting the carbonaceous solids with microwaves in the presence of an aqueous acid solution. Nadkami's process probably was not adopted to commercial practice because it is more economical to recover the sulfur from the flue gas and the heavy metals from the ashes after the coal is burnt in a boiler or furnace, in spite of corrosion problems in tubes and refractories.
There has not been a U.S. patents granted on this subject until May, 2000 probably because of the lack of development in large industrial size microwave generators and the means to introduce large quantities of the microwave into the commercial size reaction vessels.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,737 (May 30, 2000) was granted to De Chamorro, et al for the simultaneous removal of metals and sulfur from carbonaceous material using an acid medium and subjecting the mixture to microwave energy. This patent is very similar to Nadkami et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,408,999 on a process for removing sulfur and heavy metals contained in inorganic material from solid carbonaceous material. De Chamorro et al conducted their tests only on fine granules of coke and then claimed the process applicable to a wide range of carbonaceous material including bituminous sand and crude oil. This type of leaching of fine solid particles is similar to Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 5,393,320 (Feb. 28, 1995) on the leaching of fine particles of nickel laterite ore with acid while the mixture is being irradiated with microwave energy. Chamorro et al did not describe the technique of efficiently contacting the crude oil and the acid leachate as this is very important for the successful leaching reactions between the acid medium, the sulfur and metallic compounds, and the microwaves. It must be appreciated that the claims of De Chamorro et al on crude oil are of a general nature and do not provide details of equipment or techniques which will make the process a practical reality. There were no details of the procedure for recovering the heavy metals and sulfur from the leach liquor. Further, without giving any basis, Chamorro et al state that their process applies only to crude oil with an API Index which exceeds 6 degrees. Applicant have in their laboratory a heavy crude with an API of 8 degrees. This material is so viscous that a quarter inch indentation at 18 C ambient takes about 1 hour to reform. An oil or bitumen of 6 degrees API would be more viscous and the leaching process described in general by De Camorro would not function in removing sulfur or heavy metals even at the temperature of the boiling point of the acid solution and 200 psig pressure specified by De Chamorro et al. To leach sulfur and heavy metals satisfactorily, the leach solution must be in contact with the sulfur and heavy metal molecules and the conventional heat or microwaves at the required time. This contact exposure requires intimate contact between the leach solution and the crude oil. The intimate contact requires a very large contact surface. This is achieved by breaking up the crude oil into very fine particles in the mixture of crude oil-leach solution.
Heavy crude oils which normally contain high sulfur and heavy metals are usually very viscous. Hence it will be seen that the first requirement of the process is to make this crude oil more fluid and broken-up into fine particles as the crude oil is mixed with the leaching solution to allow the greatest contact between the metallic compounds and sulfur compounds in the crude oil and the leaching solution. After leaching, the leached crude has to be separated from the leachate and the remaining small amount of leach solution need to be removed from the leached crude by washing to make the leached crude suitable for refining. This was not appreciated by De Chamorro et al as they reported only experimental results on leaching very fine granules of coke. In this invention, breaking up the crude oil is accomplished by applying commercially available solvents and emulsifiers, and the use of an apparatus which can break-up the crude oil into very fine particles and apply conventional heat and/or microwaves at the same time. After the leaching is accomplished, the leached crude oil and the loaded leach solution are separated.
The leaching step is preferably carried out at the lowest possible temperature to avoid degrading the quality of the crude oil. Laboratory tests also indicated that high pressure during leaching is desirable for efficient extraction. For some crude oils, conventional heating and acid electro-leaching may be sufficient. Some crude oils may be treated satisfactorily by conventional heating, acid electro-leaching and irradiation with microwave energy.
In this invention, if sufficient sulfur is not removed during acid leaching, the crude oil may be subsequently leached with an alkali such as caustic soda or soda ash with microwave energy, or hydro-desulfurized using microwave energy and hydrogen gas. The use of microwaves in removing sulfur from crude oil at comparatively lower temperature is supported by the concept that hydrocarbon molecules are more transparent to microwaves than organo-sulfur or organo-sulfur-metallic compounds. Microwave energy would activate the organo-sulfur and organo-sulfur-metallic compounds preferentially. The temperature of microwave hydro-treating is substantially less than conventional hydro-treating, minimising the effect on the quality of the crude oil.
Microwave generating equipment has advanced considerably in the past decades but industrial microwave equipment still has a high capital cost and higher unit energy cost than conventional heat. None of the U.S. patents disclosed above mention carrying out comparative tests using only conventional heat without microwaves. Applicant's extensive experience in the leaching of minerals indicate that some minerals are leached satisfactorily by conventional heating only but other minerals compounds are only leached satisfactorily using conventional heat and microwaves. Conventional heating must be considered as a first option to treat a crude oil to meet desired specifications if the treatment is to result in the lowest capital and operating cost.
The prior art shows the principles of leaching, electromagnetic radiation, and hydro-desulfurization in processing carbonaceous materials are well known. The challenge is to apply these principles using innovative and novel techniques and apparatuses to remove sulfur and heavy metals from a wide range of crude oil and petroleum products in a commercial process.
Before describing the present invention, it must be recognised that every crude oil has its own characteristics and variation in the form and quantity of sulfur and heavy metals. The metals and sulfur could occur as fine discrete particles mixed with the crude oil such as iron pyrites or gypsum or a wide range of organo-sulfur or organo-sulfur-metallic compounds in various configurations such as paraffinic or cyclic molecular formation. The process and apparatus of the present invention is capable of treating this very wide range of crude oil feedstock and petroleum products to produce the acceptable quality of the products at a viable capital and operating cost. By-product or waste disposable must be considered as one waste product such as calcium or sodium salt may be acceptable in one plant location but not in another plant location.
In one form therefore the invention is said to reside in a process and apparatus to extract and recover sulfur and heavy metals from crude oil or petroleum fuel products consisting of the steps of emulsifying the crude oil with an emulsifying agent, adding a leach solution to the emulsified crude oil and leaching the emulsified crude oil at elevated temperature and pressure in an appropriate leaching vessel or vessels to give a leached emulsified crude oil and a leachate, separating the leached emulsified crude oil and the leachate, removing a proportion of the leachate and recovering sulfur heavy metals therefrom, washing the leached emulsified crude oil with water and separating the leached emulsified crude oil and the washing water.
Preferably the process further includes the step of microwave hydro-desulfurizing the leached and washed crude oil using hydrogen gas at a temperature below 220 degrees Celsius to ensure there is no quality degradation in the crude feed to produce a desulfurised crude oil and a hydrogen sulphide by product; and recovering sulfur from the hydrogen sulphide by product using a commercial process.
This more expensive microwave hydro-desulfurization with the accessory plants is generally applied where the sulfur content of the crude oil or petroleum product is very high and there is a very large quantity of the crude oil to be treated. Aside from removing sulfur from compounds such as mercaptans, sulphides, disulphides and thiopenes, microwave hydro-desulfurization will also improve the product crude quality by denitrogenation of pyrroles and pyridines, deoxidation of phenols and peroxides, dehalogenation of chlorides, hydrogenation of pentenes to pentanes, and some hydrocracking of long chain hydrocarbon molecules.
Where the quantity of the acid leached crude oil or petroleum product is relatively small and the amount of sulfur to be further removed is also relatively small, the acid leached and washed crude oil may be subjected to an alkali leach with microwaves and then washed to meet final sulfur specifications. The sulfur is recovered in the waste product as sodium sulphate.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention the leaching step may comprise the steps of leaching the emulsified crude oil with an acid leach solution while microwave energy is applied, washing the acid leached emulsified crude oil with water, separating the crude oil from the wash water, re-emulsifying the crude oil as required, leaching the re-emulsified crude oil with an alkali leach solution while microwave energy is being applied, washing the alkali leached re-emulsified crude oil with water, and separating the crude oil from the wash water. The acid and alkali leached crude oil may subsequently be subjected to microwave hydro-desulfurization if required to meet product specifications.
The viscosity of the feedstock crude oil may be reduced at the beginning of the process by the addition of a solvent before emulsification and the solvent may be recovered for reuse by distillation before the process of this invention. Up to 20% by volume of a solvent may be added to the crude oil before emulsification depending on the viscosity properties of the crude oil and the solvent.
One class or more of emulsifying agents for leaching may be added at an amount of up to 0.5% by weight of the crude oil. The emulsifying agent should be sufficiently stable in acid or alkali conditions and temperature of below 160 C.
The emulsifying agents are selected so that the least amount is required to achieved emulsification and any left-over after leaching does not reduce the quality of the crude oil or petroleum product.
The leach solution may be a solution of an inorganic acid or alkali which is used in an amount of about 5 percent to 50 percent by volume of the crude oil.
The leaching process may be carried out in a vertical cylinder or a multi-compartment horizontal vessel capable of containing the pressure, temperature, and corrosive nature of the crude oil-leaching solution mixture.
The leaching may be carried out in a vessel provided with a stand pipe and an agitation mechanism consisting of an impeller and baffle assembly sufficient to circulate the mixture of crude oil-leach solution and provide intense agitation and mixing in the area where microwave energy is being applied. The washing vessels may be fitted with the same agitation mechanism but without microwave supply and operate at ambient pressure.
The leaching vessel may be provided with external insulation and internal or external means of conventional heating.
The leaching vessel may be provided with a means of applying large quantities of microwave energy at the space of intense mixing of the crude oil and the leach solution.
The leaching stage may be carried out at temperatures of between 25 C to 160 C and pressure of up to 100 bars.
Heating at the leaching step may be carried out by the application of conventional heating only, the application of microwave energy or a combination of conventional heating and microwave energy.
The leaching step may consist of one or more stages with a liquid liquid separation between stages and the leaching may be arranged in countercurrent mode.
There may be one or more stages of liquid liquid separation between the leaching step and the washing step.
The washing step may consist of one or more stages with a liquid liquid separation between stages and the washing step may be arranged in countercurrent mode.
There may be one or more stage of liquid liquid separation between the washing step and the hydro-desulfurization step.
The wash water may contain a small amount of alkali to ensure that the acid leached and washed crude oil has the best quality for the subsequent microwave hydro-desulfurization step.
The microwave energy may be applied to the leach solution at 800 to 22,000 megahertz frequency.
The leach solution may contain an inorganic acid or alkali, or include a small amount of oxidising agent such as hydrogen peroxide.
The leaching step may include anode cells in the leachate circuit to oxidise suitable ions such as ferrous and vanadium ions before the leachate is recycled to the leaching step. Aside from the acid, the ferric and vanadic ions produced from leached ferrous and vanadous ions at the anode will participate and assist in the leaching process.
The step of the recovering heavy metals may include the steps of separating a bleed solution from the main leaching stream after the anode cell, adjusting the pH of the bleed solution to about between 1.5 and 2.5 using calcium or sodium hydroxide or carbonate, applying hydrogen sulphide gas to the hot solution to precipitate base metals and other metals susceptible to this treatment and filtering the precipitate, adjusting the pH of the boiling solution to a pH of about between 3.0 to 3.5 using soda ash to precipitate compact iron oxide which is filtered from the solution, applying a small amount of an oxidising agent such as hydrogen peroxide to convert vanadium ions to their highest oxidation state before applying soda ash or ammonia to the solution to increase the pH to about 3.6 to 4.6, applying hydrogen sulphide gas to the solution to precipitate vanadium sulphide, filtering the vanadium sulphide precipitate, adjusting the pH of the hot solution to between 8 and 10 using soda ash or ammonia to precipitate vanadium hydroxide and subjecting the waste solution to a vacuum to recover any hydrogen sulphide gas left in the waste solution before the solution is discarded.
The acid leached and washed crude oil may further be treated with microwave hydro-desulfurisation or alkali leaching.
Conventional heating is used to raise the temperature of the crude oil between the washing step and the hydro-desulfurization step.
The microwave hydro-desulfurization crude oil product containing the waste product of hydrogen sulphide mixed with un-reacted hydrogen gas is cooled and the hydrogen and hydrogen sulphide gas are stripped from the crude oil. Hydrogen is separated and re-cycled to the microwave hydro-desulfurization while the hydrogen sulphide gas is fed to a conventional Claus or Stretford process to convert the hydrogen sulphide into elemental sulfur and hydrogen gas which is re-cycled to the microwave hydro-desulfurization process.
The microwave hydro-desulfurization may be carried out at temperature of up to 220 C and pressure of up to 100 bars unless higher temperature and pressure are required for increased hydro-cracking for a particular crude oil or petroleum product.
The microwave hydro-desulfurization process may be carried out in the presence of catalyst selected from cobalt and molybdenum on alumina to enhance the efficiency of the reaction or to reduce the required hydro-desulfurization temperature and pressure.
The microwave hydro-desulfurization may be carried out in a vessel comprising a vertical cylindrical vessel or a multi-compartment horizontal cylindrical vessel fitted with a standpipe and a hollow shaft for the admission of hydrogen and an impeller-baffle assembly to intensely and intimately mix the leached crude and the hydrogen gas at the space where the microwave energy is applied.
The microwave hydro-desulfurization vessel may be provided with external insulation and internal or external source of conventional heating.
The microwave energy applied to the microwave hydro-desulfurization vessel may range between 880 and 22,000 megahertz where the most efficient frequency is determined experimentally for each crude oil sample.
The microwave hydro-desulfurization vessel may be fitted with microwave generators and wave guides through quartz windows at the bottom or sides of the microwave hydro-desulfurization vessel. Alternatively the microwave energy for the hydro-desulfurization step is applied in a series of pipes where the crude oil is being circulated from a holding vessel. In a further arrangement the microwave energy for the hydro-desulfurization step may applied to the crude oil through wave guides inside the vessel and wherein the microwave energy is delivered to the crude oil through slots in the wave guide. Alternatively the microwave energy for the hydro-desulfurization may be delivered at the end of several short wave guides inside the vessel under convection tubes at a space where there is maximum intense and intimate mixing of the crude oil and hydrogen gas. The microwave energy for the hydro-desulfurization may be delivered at the end of antennae inside the vessel under convection tubes at a space where there maximum intense and intimate mixing of the crude oil and hydrogen gas.
This then generally describes the invention but to assist with understanding reference will now be made to preferred embodiments as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
Heavy sour crude from well 15 is usually very viscous and it may be necessary to add a solvent or a cutting agent in mixer 1 to make the crude oil sufficiently fluid to pipe it to a central sulfur and heavy metals processing plant. The solvent may be injected into the well or mixed at the surface. The large amount of solvent can be reduced by distillation 2 by heating the crude oil after it has been transferred in pipeline 3 to the processing site. Recovered solvent is recycled to the mixer or to the well.
The crude oil is then emulsified by mixing in a mixer 4 with emulsifying agents 5 and water 6.
Water based leaching solution 14 is added in the leaching step. The microwave leaching apparatus 7 must be capable of high pressure and resist the corrosive mixture of the crude and leach solution. A crude oil whether it is easy or difficult to leach will contain sulfur and metallic compounds that are easy to leach and compounds which are difficult to leach. A proportion of the leach solution is extracted and chemicals added 17 as will be discussed later for extraction of metals and sulfur compounds 16.
After leaching and washing the crude oil is transferred to a microwave hydro-desulfurizing stage 9. Hydrogen is added at 10 and after treatment as will be discussed in more detail later, the desulfurized oil is cooled before hydrogen sulphide and excess hydrogen is removed in stripper 12. Hydrogen and hydrogen sulphide are separated and the hydrogen sulphide is treated at stage 11 to give elemental sulfur 18. Hydrogen is recycled to the hydrogen supply 10 to the desulfurisation step.
The cleaned crude oil 19 and any light fraction separated in the stripper are remixed to form the final clean oil product 20.
For metals recovery, allowing the metal concentration in the leachate 37 to build up will improve metals recovery and reduce acid loses during metals recovery. A bleed stream 60 is taken from leachate stream 37 and delivered to mixer 62 where the pH of the solution is adjusted to 1.5 to 2.5 with lime or soda ash 61 before hydrogen sulphide gas 63 is applied to the hot solution 66 in mixer 64. Base metal and other metal sulphides 65 are precipitated and filtered. The filtrate 67 is heated to boiling and the pH is adjusted to between 3 to 3.5 with soda ash 68 in mixer 60 resulting in the precipitation of iron as a compact iron oxide 70. After filtering, the clear solution 71 is delivered to the vanadium recovery section 73 where the vanadium ions are oxidised to their highest valency of 5+by adding oxidising agents such as hydrogen peroxide 72. After adjusting the pH of the solution with soda ash or ammonia 74 to about 3.6 to 4.6, hydrogen sulphide 75 is applied to the solution where some of the vanadium precipitates as sulphides 76. After filtration, the pH is further adjusted to between 8 to 10 with soda ash or ammonia causing the rest of the vanadium to precipitate as an oxide 76. Vacuum 77 is applied to the waste solution to recover hydrogen sulphide gas before the waste solution 78 containing mainly calcium, sodium and some ammonium sulphate is delivered to the waste pond.
The metals recovery is similar to the process shown and described in
The crude feedstock 105 is mixed with the second stage wash 112 in mixer 106. The mixture is fed into a vortex separator 107 for liquid liquid separation where the salty water 133 with some solids is sent to the waste pond and the crude oil is delivered to the first wash mixer 109 where water 108 is added. The mixture from mixer 109 is subjected to two stages of liquid liquid separation 110 and 111 before the de-salted crude oil 113 is processed in the acid leach and washing section 114 and then to the alkali leaching and washing section 122 before the washed oil 132 is passed to the heater 123 for subsequent refining in distillation column 136 for instance.
The acid leach liquor 115 or a bleed stream is processed in the solvent extraction process 116 where metal ions are transferred to the strip solution 134. Because metals can be plated out from the solution 134 by the cathode cells 124 or alternatively precipitated by applying hydrogen sulphide. The pH of the solution from the cathode cells 124 is adjusted and oxidised with oxidising agent 126 in mixer 127 before hydrogen sulphide 128 is applied in mixer 129 to precipitate the vanadium compounds 130. Vacuum 131 is applied before solution 135 is returned for stripping duty in the solvent extraction process. Stream 117 is oxidised in anode cells 119 and make-up acid 120 added before the leach solution 121 is recycled to the acid leaching circuit. Iron is not removed in the solvent extraction process and a bleed stream 118 is removed from stream 117 for neutralisation and recovery of the iron.
A simple leaching apparatus is shown on
A pipe method of microwave application is shown on
The apparatus shown in
When the apparatus shown in
The supply of microwaves to the vessel 155 in
In
In
When used for leaching as discussed above the apparatus shown in
Microwave leaching tests were carried out using a 3-liter autoclave fitted with a 1.2 kw microwave generator at 2450 megahertz frequency where the microwaves are inserted into the autoclave through a quartz window at the bottom of the autoclave. The samples tested are a very fluid reduced crude from the Middle East with a specific gravity of 0.8418 at 36 C and a commercially available emulsified bitumen containing 40 to 45 percent water which had a specific gravity of 0.9851 at 28 C and an unknown uncut bitumen.
Leaching tests were carried out with an over-pressure of 8 bars of nitrogen with sulfuric acid of 30% strength at 7.5% by volume. The samples absorbed microwaves readily during the test which range in temperature from 80 to 140 degrees Celsius. Higher temperatures resulted in the sulfuric acid reacting with the oil. The best extractions obtained based on the analysis of the feed and the leached crude were:
We anticipate higher extraction rates than reported above because the low rpm centrifuge used in the above tests was not efficient in separating the leachate from the crude oil. Tests on the uncut bitumen were discarded because high temperatures (greater than 165 C) were used which resulted in the acid reacting with the bitumen.
The results indicated that the removal of sulfur and heavy metals is much easier for lighter crude but more difficult for heavy crude. The addition of small amounts of an oxidising agent such as hydrogen peroxide is expected to increase the extraction of vanadium based on tests in applicant's laboratory on recovering vanadium from a complex iron ore.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PQ4065 | Nov 1999 | AU | national |
PQ4109 | Nov 1999 | AU | national |
PQ4122 | Nov 1999 | AU | national |
PQ4147 | Nov 1999 | AU | national |
PQ5270 | Jan 2000 | AU | national |
PQ5390 | Feb 2000 | AU | national |
PQ5573 | Feb 2000 | AU | national |
PQ6524 | Mar 2000 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU00/01390 | 11/13/2000 | WO | 00 | 5/15/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/36564 | 5/25/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1686491 | Hughes et al. | Oct 1928 | A |
1785242 | Becker et al. | Dec 1930 | A |
2157315 | Archibald | May 1939 | A |
3095368 | Bieber et al. | Jun 1963 | A |
4234402 | Kirkbride | Nov 1980 | A |
4279722 | Kirkbride | Jul 1981 | A |
4408999 | Nadkarni et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4539096 | Rudnick | Sep 1985 | A |
5087350 | Paris-Marcano | Feb 1992 | A |
5985137 | Ohsol et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6068737 | De Chamorro et al. | May 2000 | A |