Patent Application
20090054412
Insomnia is one of the most common complaints in general medical practice. Approximately 10% to 15% of adults suffer from chronic insomnia, and an additional 25% to 35% have transient or occasional insomnia. Transient insomnia is an insomnia that is present for one to several days, and is less than one week in duration. Short term insomnia is an insomnia of one to three weeks in duration. Chronic insomnia is typically accepted to involve episodes greater than three (3) weeks in duration (Roth, Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2001; (Suppl.):3-8).
Generally, as discussed in detail by Russell P. Rosenberg in “Sleep Maintenance Insomnia: Strengths and Weaknesses of Current Pharmacologic Therapies,” Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 18[1]:49-56, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference, patients with insomnia are further divided into groups based on when their sleep difficulty most often occurs. The three recognized categories of insomnia are (1) sleep onset insomnia (difficulty in falling asleep); (2) sleep maintenance insomnia (difficulty staying asleep); and (3) terminal insomnia (early-morning awakenings coupled with an inability to return to sleep). Terminal insomnia is sometimes referred to as sleep offset insomnia. These symptoms may occur singly or in combination, as is the case in many patients with chronic insomnia, which may result from several different etiologies. Patients often have several sleep complaints simultaneously and experience a gamut of sleep disturbances, including prolonged latency to sleep onset, increased time awake during the sleep period and reduced total sleep time.
There are various medications that have been used to treat insomnia. The early type of insomnia drugs are what have come to be known as classic benzodiazepines. These benzodiazepines exert their pharmacological actions by interacting with the benzodiazepine binding sites associated with the GABAA receptor. GABAA receptors are ligand-gated ion channels, and functional receptors are made up from combinations of different subunit proteins. Subunits are divided in three main classes of alpha (α), beta (β) and gamma (γ) subunits. GABAA receptors that have a benzodiazepine binding site are formed from either α1, α2, α3 or α5 subunits in combination with β and γ2 subunits (Paul J. Whiting, DDT Vol. 8, No. 10, May 2003).
The important allosteric modulatory effects of drugs acting at the benzodiazepine site were recognized early and the distribution of activities at different receptor subtypes has been an area of intense pharmacological discovery. Agonists that act at the benzodiazepine site are known to exhibit anxiolytic, sedative, and hypnotic effects. However, while some classic benzodiazepines, which are considered full agonists at the GABAA receptor benzodiazepine site, are generally regarded as being effective at inducing and maintaining sleep, which is believed to be due to their relatively long half-lives ranging from 10-40 hours, they were found to produce undesirable residual effects. These may include cognitive impairment, excessive sedation, ataxia, potentiation of ethanol effects and a tendency for tolerance and drug dependence. A particular problem with classic benzodiazepines is rebound insomnia, manifested by restlessness and somnipathy, which emerges on withdrawal. Furthermore, the quality of sleep that is induced by these compounds is unphysiological. Classic benzodiazepines typically reduce slow wave sleep (SWS), REM sleep and generally adversely affect sleep architecture. One of the reasons for these undesirable side effects was deemed to be associated with the afore-mentioned relatively long half-life of the classic benzodiazepines.
In order to overcome these problems, agents with shorter half-lives have been investigated. Examples of such agents include the so-called non-benzodiazepines, such as zolpidem and zalepon, that also act as full agonists at the GABAA receptor benzodiazepine site. However, while these newer agents are generally effective in reducing time to sleep onset (i.e., decreasing sleep latency), they have been found to be less effective at improving sleep maintenance, as well as treating terminal insomnia.
Sleep maintenance difficulties can be quantified using Polysomnography (PSG). When quantifying sleep maintenance difficulties via PSG, wake time after sleep onset (WASO) and number of awakenings (NAW) are the most commonly utilized parameters. WASO is a robust measure of sleep maintenance, as it represents the total amount of time spent awake after the person has reached persistent sleep, while NAW represents only the number of awakenings the person has experienced. Therefore, a person may wake only once during the night (NAW), but may spend 3 hours awake (WASO), so the latter measure more closely reflects the level of disturbance.
Difficulty with maintaining sleep is common in patients with medical and psychiatric disorders, as well as in patients with primary insomnia, and it occurs with more frequency than sleep onset problems in certain population groups. However, it is widely recognized that currently used medications fall short when it comes to safely and effectively addressing sleep maintenance problems.
The present invention provides an effective method for treating sleep maintenance insomnia and/or terminal insomnia, each of which can be associated with transient, short term, chronic, primary and secondary insomnia. Specifically, the present invention provides a method for decreasing wake time after sleep onset (WASO), increasing total sleep time (TST), reduced total wake time per hour and/or reducing early-morning awakenings. All of these advantages can be achieved while reducing latency to sleep onset and/or latency to persistent sleep, thus also effectively treating sleep onset insomnia. Accordingly, the present invention provides an effective method for treating various types of insomnia.
This method involves the use of 7-chloro-3-(5-dimethylaminomethyl-[1,2,4]oxadiazol-3-yl)-5-methyl-4,5-dihydro-imidazo[1,5-a][1,4]benzodiazepine-6-one, which is represented by formula (II) below, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof to treat sleep maintenance insomnia and/or terminal insomnia, as well as the above-outlined specific conditions:
Preferably, the amount of the compound of formula (II) or its pharmaceutically acceptable salt that is administered for the treatment is from about 0.5 mg to about 5 mg. The treatment amount may be from about 1.0 mg to about 4.5 mg, from about 1.5 mg to about 4 mg, from about 2 mg to about 3.5 mg, from about 2.5 mg to about 3 mg, or any range among all of the above-listed amounts. For example, the treatment amount is from about 0.5 mg or about 1.5 mg to about 5 mg, about 4.5 mg, about 4 mg, about 3.5 mg, about 3 mg or about 2.5 mg. More preferably, the amount is from about 1 mg to about 3 mg, yet more preferably from about 1.5 mg to about 2.5 mg.
Accordingly, a particularly preferably pharmaceutical composition for the treatment in accordance with the present invention contains from about 0.5 mg to about 5 mg of the compound of formula (II). More preferably, the pharmaceutical composition will be in a unit dosage form comprising 0.5 mg, 1.5 mg, 2 mg, 2.5 mg, 3 mg, 3.5 mg, 4 mg, 4.5 mg or 5 mg of the compound of formula (II).
The subjects to be treated in accordance with the present invention are humans.
As used herein, latency to persistent sleep (LPS) is defined as the time from “lights out” to the beginning of 10 uninterrupted minutes of sleep.
Persistent sleep is defined as 10 uninterrupted minutes of sleep after initial sleep onset.
Wake after sleep onset (WASO) is defined as the total amount of time spent awake after the onset of persistent sleep over a fixed 8-hour period in bed (captures total duration of lost sleep after at least 1 awakening).
Number of awakenings (NAW) is defined as the return to an awake state (number of wake periods lasting at least 1 minute occurring after the onset of persistent sleep).
Total sleep time (TST) is defined as the total time asleep over a fixed 8-hour period.
Sleep efficiency index is a ratio of TST to total time in bed, i.e., a percentage of time spent asleep. Total time in bed is typically 8 hours for study purposes.
Sleep architecture refers to the changes in the stages of sleep during the sleep period. Typically, in healthy humans, sleep stages occur in cycles lasting about 90 to about 120 minutes each. Four to five such cycles occur during a typical night of sleep. During the first half of the night, the healthy individual typically passes from wakefulness briefly into stage I sleep and then to stages II, III, and IV. Stages II and III reappear, after which rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is observed for the first time. During the second half of the night, stage II and REM sleep alternate.
Slow wave sleep (SWS) is stage III and IV sleep. It is characterized by a transition to an electroencephalogram (EEG) with high amplitude delta EEG waves (1.5 to 3 Hz).
As used herein, AUC is the area under the drug plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to infinity. Cmax is the maximum observed plasma concentration of the drug from time zero to infinity.
One of the major challenges in treating insomnia is to develop a drug that induces sleep quickly, helps individuals remain asleep and allows them to awaken feeling refreshed rather than hung over. The present invention meets this challenge and provides effective methods for treating all types of insomnia. In particular, the present invention provides a method for treating maintenance and/or terminal insomnia by administering to a human in need of this treatment an effective amount of the compound of formula (II) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof:
The compound of formula (II) can be prepared in accordance with the methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,391,873, which is incorporated herein by reference. It has been disclosed as useful for treating acute and chronic anxiety disorders.
As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,665,718, this type of compound is deemed to display sedative activity that sets in very rapidly, but lasts only a relatively short period of time. Accordingly, the compound of formula (II) would not be expected to be beneficial in the treatments of maintenance and terminal insomnia.
Nonetheless, the compound of formula (II) was surprisingly found to be effective for treatment of not only sleep onset insomnia in humans, but also maintenance insomnia and terminal insomnia, even when the administration amount was significantly low, on the order of about 0.5 mg to about 5 mg, particularly from about 1.5 mg to about 2.5 mg. The surprising nature of these results is further supported by the finding that the compound of formula (II) has a relatively short half-life of about 3-4 hours, akin to the conventional insomnia treatment agents having relatively short half-lives, which were found lacking effectiveness in sleep maintenance. The efficacy of the compound of formula (II) for the treatment of various types of insomnia was not found to be improved when the administration amount exceeded about 5 mg, and residual sedation effects were noted at higher doses. Conventional insomnia agents, such as zolpidem, trazodone and zalepon, were found to be less than effective for treating maintenance and terminal insomnia even when administered in amounts that are at least twice that of the compound of formula (II) (see Roth, Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2001; (Suppl.):3-8).
Pharmaceutically acceptable salts for the compound of formula (II) can be prepared by standard techniques that will be familiar to the person skilled in the art. Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable salts include those with inorganic or organic acids. Examples of such salts are the hydrochlorides, hydrobromides, sulfates, nitrates, citrates, acetates, maleates, succinates, methanesulphonates, p-toluenesulphonates and the like.
The compound of formula (II) achieves its sedative effects by positive allosteric modulation of GABAA receptors via the benzodiazepine site. However, unlike conventional agents for treating insomnia that act at the benzodiazepine site, the compound of formula (II) is only a partial agonist, i.e., it produces a lower maximum potentiation of the GABAA receptor. Thus, unexpectedly, it was found that even a partial agonist can be used for the treatment of maintenance and terminal insomnia.
The ability to allosterically stimulate currents elicited by GABA (EC3-5) was determined for the compound of formula (II), zolpidem and diazepam at the rat GABAA receptors of the subunit composition α1β2γ2, α2β2γ2, α3β2γ2 and α5β2γ2. 7-Chloro-3-(5-dimethylaminomethyl-[1,2,4]oxadiazol-3-yl)-5methyl-4,5-dihydro-imidazol[1,5,-a][1,4]benzodiazepine-6-one was used to test the effects of the compound of formula (II):
Similar procedures were chosen as for the investigation of other GABAA receptor subunit specific substances (e.g., Baur et al., 2005; Mol. Pharmacol. 68, 787-792).
Expression in Xenopus oocytes
Lobes of the ovary containing the follicles were obtained by surgical procedures from female Xenopus laevis. Follicles were singled out using a platinum loop. Fifty nL of cRNA solution at a ratio of αx:β2:γ2 of 1:1:5 (3.3-10 nM αx (x=1,2,3,5); 3.3-10 nM β2; 16.7-50 nM γ2) (Boileau et al., 2002; Neuropharmacology 43, 695-700) were microinjected into Xenopus follicles. Several hours after microinjection the follicles were freed of follicular layers and adhering connective tissue by a collagenase/hypertonic shock procedure (Sigel, 1987; J. Physiol.(Land) 386, 73-90). Oocytes were kept at constant 18° C. until measurement (1-4 days) in a modified Barth solution (88 mM NaCl, 1 mM KCl, 2.4 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.5), 0.82 mM MgSO4×7H2O, 0.34 mM Ca(NO3)2×4H2O, 0.41 mM CaCl2×2H2O, 100 U Penicillin/mL, 100 μg Streptomycin/mL, sterile filtered).
Currents were measured using a home-built amplifier in combination with a xy-recorder or were digitized using a MacLab/200 (AD Instruments) and stored on a computer. Xenopus oocytes were voltage clamped using the two-electrode voltage clamp technique (electrode resistance about 0.8 MΩ) at −80 mV. The medium contained 90 mM NaCl, 1 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM Na-Hepes (pH 7.4) and 0.5% DMSO.
GABA was applied for 20-50 seconds without or in combination with other drugs and a washout period of 4 minutes was allowed to ensure full recovery from desensitization, which was experimentally determined. The perfusion solution (6 mL/min) was applied through a glass capillary with an inner diameter of 1.35 mm, the mouth of which was placed about 0.4 mm from the surface of the oocyte. The rate of solution change under our conditions has been estimated 70% within less than 0.5 s (Sigel et al., 1990; Neuron 5, 703-711). The entire perfusion system and the assay chamber were cleaned between drug applications by washing with DMSO.
Data is given as mean±SD, except in the figures where data is shown for clarity as mean±SEM. Current stimulation was calculated as follows: stimulation (%)=((I(GABA+modulator)−I(GABA))/I(GABA))×100%, where I is the current amplitude. Where indicated, the stimulation was standardized to the stimulation by 1 μM diazepam (100%). To obtain
GABA (EC3-5) was applied to an oocyte expressing α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors several times until the current response was stable. The GABA (EC3-5) refers to the effective concentration of GABA, which produces a response that is 3-5% of the maximal response to high concentrations of GABA. Such a low concentration of GABA is chosen in order to better see the potentiating effect of positive allosteric modulators.
GABA was then applied in combination with various concentrations of the compound of formula (II) between 0.3 nM and 3,000 nM to produce a cumulative concentration response curve. This resulted in a concentration-dependent potentiation of the GABA response as plotted in
Concentration response curves were also performed with oocytes expressing α2β2γ2, α3β2γ2, or α5β2γ2, after establishing the optimal concentration range as indicated above. The compound of formula (II) performed as a partial positive allosteric modulator. At concentrations <100 nM, the compound of formula (II) showed preference for α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors in comparison to α5β2γ2, α3β2γ2 and α2β2γ2.
GABA (EC3-5) was applied to an oocyte expressing α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors several times until the current response was stable. Subsequently, GABA was applied in combination with various concentrations of zolpidem between 1 and 10,000 nM. Concentration response curves were performed twice with the same batch of oocytes and twice with an independent batch of oocytes.
In each batch of oocytes the stimulation by 1 μM diazepam was determined in five oocytes, extent of stimulation averaged and defined as 100%. Where indicated, stimulation by zolpidem in each batch of oocytes was expressed as percentage of this value in the corresponding batch.
Concentration response curves were also performed with oocytes expressing α2β2γ2, α3β2γ2, or α5β2γ2. As expected, zolpidem showed a higher affinity at α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors in comparison to α2β2γ2, α3β2γ2, and α5β2γ2.
Current stimulation by diazepam was determined in each batch of oocytes as follows. GABA (EC3-5) was applied until a stable response was obtained. Subsequently, GABA was applied in combination with 1 μM diazepam. Stimulation at the same subunit combination in different batches of oocytes was not statistically different, in each case. Stimulation by 1 μM diazepam at α1β2γ2 amounted to 223+28% (n=5) and 178+20% (n=5) in two different batches of oocytes. Stimulation at α2β2γ2 amounted to 264+61% (n=5), 280+71% (n=5) and 318+62% (n=5) in three different batches of oocytes. Stimulation at α3β2γ2 amounted to 417+85% (n=5) and 417+144% (n=5) in two different batches of oocytes. Stimulation at α5β2γ2 amounted to 237+97% (n=5) and 160+4% (n=5) in two different batches of oocytes.
The results obtained for zolpidem are comparable to those achieved by Sanna et al 2002 (referenced above) in previous experiments and show an efficacy of 215% relative to diazepam at α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors. Zolpidem therefore acts as a positive allosteric modulator with high intrinsic activity, i.e., acts a full agonist. The compound of formula (II) showed a lower intrinsic activity, i.e., acts as a partial agonist.
Low intrinsic activity of the compound of formula (II) means that potentiation of the response mediated by GABAA receptors is limited even at high levels of receptor occupancy, which could be achieved with high concentrations of the compound of formula (II). PET studies indicate zolpidem (20 mg) produces receptor occupancy of about 20% in man (Abadie et al., European Journal of Pharmacology, 295 (1996), 35-44), i.e., clinical dose (10 mg) is on the steep inflection part of the dose-response curve. The compound of formula (II), nevertheless, still produces sufficient potentiation of the GABAA receptor to be highly effective for both sleep onset and maintenance. Excessive potentiation at higher doses is limited.
Producing lower stimulation at the individual receptor level is believed to be advantageous. Since the maximal potentiation of the GABAA response produced by such a low efficacy agonist is limited by its intrinsic efficacy, no further potentiation of the GABAA response is achieved beyond a certain plasma concentration. In a clinical setting, such a limit on the maximum potentiation of the GABAA receptor mediated response provides an advantageous ability to avoid excess potentiation with increasing plasma concentrations.
As a result of partial agonist activity at the GABAA receptor benzodiazepine site, the compound of formula (II) can also provide a more restful and improved quality of sleep by practically having no effect on sleep architecture, producing no impairment of slow wave sleep (SWS). Classic benzodiazepines, which act as full agonists, typically reduce SWS and generally adversely affect sleep architecture. This ability to produce improved quality sleep over a sustained period, whilst minimizing side effects, leads to the advantageous use of the compound of formula (II) for the treatment of various types of insomnia. In particular, various types of insomnia may be treated advantageously by achieving a maximal potentiation of the response mediated by the al subunit containing GABAA receptors from only about 40% to about 90% using the compound of formula (II) or its pharmaceutically acceptable salts.
The potentiation of the GABAA mediated response over time following the administration (e.g., oral) of the compound of formula (II) may be determined using a model. In this model, measured or predicted free plasma concentration following the dosing of the compound of formula (II) (assuming 50% plasma protein binding) as the clinically relevant drug concentration and the in vitro concentration-response data for GABAA receptor potentiation as discussed above can be used to predict the percent potentiation of the response mediated by GABAA α1β2γ2 (α1-containing) receptors over time after the administration. Specifically, the percent potentiation of the GABAA α1β2γ2 receptor mediated response for the compound of formula (II) can be calculated as follows:
% potentiation=Efficacy (maximal % potentiation of GABAA α1β2γ2 receptor)/[1+(EC50/concentration of the compound of formula (II))].
The compound of formula (II) and pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts thereof can be used as medicaments, for example in the form of pharmaceutical preparations. The pharmaceutical preparations are typically administered orally, for example, in the form of tablets, coated tablets, dragees, hard and soft gelatine capsules, solutions, emulsions or suspensions. The administration can, however, also be effected rectally, for example, in the form of suppositories, or parenterally, for example, in the form of injection solutions.
The compound of formula (II) and pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts thereof can be processed with pharmaceutically inert, inorganic or organic carriers for the production of pharmaceutical preparations, and the like. Lactose, corn starch or derivatives thereof, talc, stearic acid or its salts and the like can be used, for example, as carriers for tablets, coated tablets, dragees and hard gelatine capsules. Suitable carriers for soft gelatine capsules are, for example, vegetable oils, waxes, fats, semi-solid and liquid polyols and the like; although carriers are not necessary in the case of soft gelatine capsules. Suitable carriers for the production of solutions and syrups are, for example, water, polyols, sucrose, invert sugar, glucose and the like. Adjuvants, such as alcohols, polyols, glycerol, vegetable oils and the like, can be used for aqueous injection solutions of water-soluble acid addition salts of the compound of formula (II), but as a rule are not necessary. Suitable carriers for suppositories are, for example, natural or hardened oils, waxes, fats, semi-liquid or liquid polyols and the like.
The pharmaceutical preparations can also contain preservatives, solubilizers, stabilizers, wetting agents, emulsifiers, sweeteners, colorants, flavorants, salts for varying the osmotic pressure, buffers, coating agents or antioxidants. They can also contain other therapeutically valuable substances.
The compound of formula (II) or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is preferably administered in the amount from about 0.5 mg to about 5 mg. More preferably, the administration amount is from about 1 mg to about 3 mg, even more preferably from about 1.5 mg to about 2.5 mg. The drug is preferably administered once daily in an oral dosage form shortly before the patient wants to sleep.
The present invention is further described by the following Examples. These Examples are indended to illustrate some of the embodiments of the present invention and are not to be construed as limitations thereon.
A placebo controlled, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study of the effects of the compound of formula (II) was conducted using a road noise model using 12 healthy volunteers. Specifically, the volunteers were subjected to road traffic noise to imitate the effects of insomnia, and the medication was orally administered 5 minutes before the 11 pm bed time in 1.0 mg, 1.5 mg, 2 mg and 2.5 mg doses in the form of a hard gelatine capsule containing the powdered compound of formula (II). Measurements were then taken at 8, 10 and 12 hours after dosing.
The results of the study are summarized in Tables 3-5.
When the data was corrected for multiple comparisons, there was no impairment of performance on any of the cognitive or psychomotor tests 8 to 12 hours after the dose was administered. Any residual effects that were observed the morning after dosing were inconsistent. Residual effects did not appear to be dose or time related.
A single and repeat dose pharmacokinetic safety and pharmacodynamic study of the effects of the compound of formula (II) was conducted using healthy volunteers. The compound of formula (II) was administered orally in 1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2 mg and 2.5 mg doses via a hard gelatine capsule containing the compound in powder form.
The pharmacokinetic analysis of the results showed that the half-life of the compound of formula (II) is about 3.5 hours. There were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic profile on day 14 after repeat dosing compared to day 1. Food was found to have little or no effect on the extent of the absorption of the compound of formula (II).
The analysis of the pharmacokinetic data also shows that onset, maintenance and/or terminal insomnia may be treated by administering the compound of formula (II) to achieve an AUC from about 17.5 ng·h/mL to about 600 ng·h/mL, from about 25 ng·h/mL to about 500 ng·h/mL or from about 25 ng·h/mL to about 400 ng·h/mL. For example, the AUC may be from about 52.5 ng·h/mL to about 360 ng·h/mL, from about 75 ng·h/mL to about 300 ng·h/mL, from about 75 ng·h/mL to about 240 ng·h/mL, from about 75 ng·h/mL to about 200 ng·h/mL, from about 75 ng·h/mL to about 150 ng·h/mL, from about 105 ng·h/mL to about 120 ng·h/mL, or any range among all of the above-listed AUC values. Preferably, the AUC is from about 75 ng·h/mL to about 240 ng·h/mL.
The treatment is also conducted to achieve a Cmax from about 2.5 ng/mL to about 125 ng/mL, from about 7.5 ng/mL to about 75 ng/mL, from about 7.5 ng/mL to about 62.5 ng/mL, from about 7.5 ng/mL to about 37.5 ng/mL, from about 10 ng/mL to about 50 ng/mL, from about 12.5 ng/mL to about 45 ng/mL, from about 15 ng/mL to about 40 ng/mL, or any range among all of the above-listed Cmax values. Preferably, the Cmax is from about 15 ng/mL to about 45 ng/mL.
A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study was conducted to assess the efficacy of the 1.5 mg and 2.5 mg doses of the compound of formula (II) in the treatment of primary insomnia in adult patients. Specifically, one of the objectives of the study was to assess the efficacy of 1.5 mg and 2.5 mg doses on polysomnogram (PSG) and patient-reported measures of sleep. Also, the study was aimed at assessing the safety of 1.5 mg and 2.5 mg doses.
The study in this Example was performed for two consecutive nights with a 5-12 day washout between each period. The dosing was conducted 30 minutes before lights were turned out for the night via oral administration of a hard gelatine capsule containing the compound of formula (II) in powder form. PSG was taken for 8 hours from “lights out” on nights 1 and 2 of each treatment period. Centralized scoring of PSG was used. Testing for residual effects using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) was performed at least 30 minutes after wake time (9 hours post dose). The overall study design is shown in
The study was conducted using 67 subjects younger than 65 years of age (21 males, 46 females; mean age 45.1 yrs, range 23-64 yrs) with a documented diagnosis of primary insomnia (DSM-IV criteria). These subjects' typical bed time was between 9 pm and 1 am with at least 7 hours in bed. These subjects reported sleep latency of at least 45 minutes and total sleep time (TST) of not more than 6.5 hours in a sleep diary for at least 3 of 7 nights.
On screening using PSG for 2 nights, the patients showed latency to persistent sleep (LPS) of more than 20 minutes, with no nights showing LPS of less than 15 minutes. Mean wake time after sleep onset (WASO) of the patients was at least 40 minutes and mean TST was 240-420 minutes.
The top-line efficacy results of the study in Example 3 are shown in Table 7.
The compound of formula (II) showed robust effects on both sleep onset and sleep maintenance. Specifically, compared to a placebo, the 1.5 mg dose reduced LPS by 17.0 minutes (p<0.0001) and the 2.5 mg dose reduced LPS by 20.7 minutes (p<0.0001), as shown in
Importantly, as shown in
These results are particularly unexpected for an agent such as the compound of formula (II). Since it is only a partial agonist at the GABAA receptor benzodiazepine site and its half-life is similar to some insomnia agents acting as full agonists at this site, which were found ineffective for the treatment of maintenance and terminal insomnia even when used in substantially larger amounts, the compound of formula (II) would be expected to be even less effective than these other agents. It has now been unexpectedly found that this is not the case.
In addition to the improvements in the quantity of sleep, the subjects of the study also reported a marked improvement in sleep quality for both 1.5 and 2.5 mg doses, which is demonstrated in
Maintaining normal sleep architecture is a very important component of getting a good night rest. Some conventional insomnia medications, such as classic benzodiazepines, may have the ability to induce and maintain sleep, but they do so by considerably altering the normal sleep architecture, which results in unrefreshing sleep and other side effects.
The results of the study conducted in accordance with Example 3 showed that the compound of formula (II) produces no patient-reported residual sedation effects at either the 1.5 mg dose or the 2.5 mg dose compared with the placebo. This is demonstrated by the chart in
The objective residual effects of the administration of the compound of formula (II) were also evaluated. The scores on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) taken by the subjects 9 hours after administering the dose were only slightly lower than those obtained from the subjects who were administered the placebo.
The results also showed that the compound of formula (II) was safe and well-tolerated at 1.5 mg and 2.5 mg doses. No serious side effects, and only a low incidence of adverse events, were reported. These results are summarized in Table 8.
†reported at any time in the study irrespective of whether these events were considered related to the medication
While the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof and the accompanying figures, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.
