Tubular systems, such as those used in the completion and carbon dioxide sequestration industries often employ anchors to positionally fix one tubular to another tubular, as well as seals to seal the tubulars to one another. Although existing anchoring and sealing systems serve the functions for which they are intended, the industry is always receptive to new systems and methods for anchoring and sealing tubulars.
Disclosed herein is a treatment plug. The treatment plug includes, an anchor runnable and settable within a structure having, at least two slips movably engaged with one another to cause the at least two slips to move radially into engagement with the structure in response to longitudinal movement between the at least two slips. The treatment plug also has at least one seal having a deformable metal member configured to radially deform into sealing engagement with the structure in response to longitudinal compression of the deformable metal member, and a seat that is sealingly receptive to a plug.
Further disclosed herein is a method of anchoring and sealing a treatment plug. The method includes, longitudinally moving a first half of a plurality of slips relative to a second half of the plurality of slips, altering a radial dimension defined by the plurality of slips, anchoring the plurality of slips to a structure, longitudinally compressing at least one deformable member, and sealingly engaging the structure with the at least one deformable member.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to the Figures.
Referring to
The anchor 14 has a plurality of slips 26, a first half 26A of which are movable in a first direction according to arrow ‘A’ relative to a second half 26B movable in a second direction according to arrow ‘B;’ the first direction being longitudinally opposite to the second direction. Each of slips 26 has opposing perimetrical edges 30 that are tapered to form a perimetrical wedge shape. Additionally each of slips 26 in the first half 26A are positioned perimetrically between adjacent slips 26 of the second half 26B. A tongue 34 on one edge 30 fits into a groove 38 on a complementary edge 30. This tongue 34 and groove 38 arrangement maintains the slips 26 at a radial dimension relative to each other of the slips 26. As such, all of the slips 26 move radially in unison in response to the first half 26A moving longitudinally relative to the second half 26B of the slips 26. One should appreciate that a perimetrical (indeed substantially circumferential in the Figures) dimension defined by the slips 26 will increase when the two halves 26A, 26B are moved longitudinally toward one another and decrease as the two halves 26A, 26B are moved longitudinally away from one another. A ‘T’ shaped tab 42 on each of the slips 26 is radially slidably engaged with a slot 46 in a collar 50 to allow the slips 26 to move radially while being supported in both longitudinal directions. Although not shown in the Figures, a tubular or membrane could be sealably engaged with both of the collars 50 to prevent fluidic communication between an outside and an inside of the components of the treatment plug 10 through the gaps between tabs 42 and the slots 46 or clearances between the adjacent slips 26.
Optionally, teeth 54, also known as wickers, on an outer surface 58 of the slips 26 can bitingly engage with a surface 62 of the structure 22 to increase locational retention of the anchor 14 within the structure 22. This biting engagement can hold the two halves 26A, 26B relative to one another in the longitudinally compressed position so that external means of holding them in such a position is not required.
Referring to
The deformable metal member 66 has a thin cross section in comparison to collars 74 displaced in both longitudinal directions from the deformable metal member 66. This difference in cross sectional thickness assures that the deformable metal member 66, and not the collars 74, deform when longitudinally compressed. The deformable metal member 66 may also have a profile such that a longitudinal central portion 78 is displaced radially from portions 82 immediately to either longitudinal side of the central portion 78. This relationship creates stress in the deformable metal member 66 to control a radial direction in which the central portion 78 will move when longitudinal compressive forces are applied to the deformable metal member 66.
The collars 74 each have a shoulder 86 that is contactable by the deformable metal member 66 during deformation thereof. The shoulders 86 may be contoured to allow the deformable metal member 66 to follow during deformation to control a shape of the deformation. These contours can prevent sharp bends in the deformation that might result in undesirable rupturing of the deformable metal member 66 had the contours not been present. A minimum dimension 90 between the shoulders 86 may be less than a maximum longitudinal dimension 94 of the deformable metal member 66 after deformation. By plastically deforming the deformable metal member 66 the as deformed position (illustrated in
The seal 18 of this embodiment is further configured such that the central portion 78 is located radially within surfaces 98 defining a maximum radial dimension of the collars 74 prior to deformation of the deformable metal member 66 but is located radially outside of the surfaces 98 after deformation. It should be noted that other embodiments are contemplated wherein the direction of deformation of the deformable metal member 66 is opposite to that shown in the Figures. In such an embodiment the relationships discussed herein would be reversed.
Referring again to
Referring to
The anchor 114 has a plurality of slips 126, a first half 126A of which are movable in a first direction according to arrow ‘C’ relative to a second half 126B movable in a second direction according to arrow ‘D,’ the first direction being longitudinally opposite to the second direction. Each of slips 126 has opposing perimetrical edges 130 that are tapered to form a perimetrical wedge shape. Additionally each of slips 126 in the first half 126A are positioned perimetrically between adjacent slips 126 of the second half 126B. As such, all of the slips 126 move radially in unison in response to the first half 126A moving longitudinally relative to the second half 126B of the slips 126. One should appreciate that a perimetrical (indeed substantially circumferential in the Figures) dimension defined by the slips 126 will increase when the two halves 126A, 126B are moved longitudinally toward one another and decrease as the two halves 126A, 126B are moved longitudinally away from one another. A ‘T’ shaped tab 142 on each of the slips 126 in the second half 126B is radially slidably engaged with a slot 146 in a collar 150 to allow the slips 126B to move radially while being supported in both longitudinal directions. The slips 126 of the first half 126A differ from the slips 26A of the anchor 14 in that the slips 126A do not include ‘T’ shaped tabs but instead are integrally formed as part of a sleeve 132. As such an area 140 defined where the sleeve 132 and fingers 136 of the slips 126A meet will deform as the fingers 136 radially expand while the sleeve 132 does not.
Another difference between the anchor 114 and the anchor 14 is that each of the slips 126 has a plurality of wedge shaped portions 144 displaced longitudinally from one another. The illustrated embodiment includes three such wedge portions 144 although any practical number of the wedge portions 144 is contemplated. One effect of employing more than one of the wedge portions 144 is the anchor 114 is able to engage with walls 120 of a structure 122 within which the anchor 114 is deployed over a greater longitudinal span.
Referring to
Referring to
The treatment plugs 10, 110 disclosed herein are designed to have a large minimum through bore dimension 180 in relation to the minimum radial dimension 184 of the structure 122 (see
Similarly, the seals 18, 118 also employ relatively thin walled metal material that when deformed into sealing engagement with structures 22, 122 can maintain the needed sealing loads while having the large bore dimension 180 therethrough. In fact, studies have shown that the treatment plugs 10, 110 disclosed herein can have bore dimensions 180 that are in the range of 80% to 85% of the minimum radial dimension 184 of the structure 122.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2507270 | Ragan | May 1950 | A |
5775429 | Arizmendi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6896049 | Moyes | May 2005 | B2 |
7614449 | Anderson | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20090071641 | Gaudette et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20010277987 | Frazier | Nov 2011 |
Entry |
---|
Coronado, Martin P., “Development of an Internal Coiled Tubing Connector Utilizing Permanent Packer Technology”; SPE 46036; Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc.; 1998 SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable; Houston, Texas; Apr. 15-16, 1998; pp. 139-148. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2012/071737 Mailed Jul. 29, 2014. |
Model “F-1” and “FB-1” Retainer Production Packers; Baker Packers Catalog 2014; p. 508. |
Smith, et al., “Deepwater Remotely Actuated Completions for the 21st Century”; OTC 8844; 1998 Offshore Technology Conference; Houston, Texas; May 4-7, 1998; pp. 473-487. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130186650 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |