The present invention relates to treatments of diabetic macular edema (DME) and impaired visual acuity.
Visual acuity refers, in its broadest sense, to clarity of vision. Visual acuity is dependent on optical and neural factors, i.e. the sharpness of the retinal focus within the eye, the health and functioning of the retina, and the sensitivity of the interpretative faculty of the brain. Numerous medical conditions cause impaired visual acuity. Examples of these conditions include diabetic macular edema (DME), diabetic retinopathy, retinal vascular permeability associated with diabetic retinopathy, retinal vascular occlusion, diabetes, macular degeneration and neuropathy.
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus. It leads to vision loss, if untreated, and becomes increasingly prevalent with progressing diabetes. In 2015, over 30 million Americans were estimated to be affected by diabetes and almost 10 million by diabetic retinopathy; 1.5 million were estimated to have vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy and 908,000 of these would have DME (Lee, Wong et al. 2015). DME is the leading cause of moderate vision loss among working age adults in most developed countries (Diabetes, Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes et al. 2009).
The clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy begin with retinal hemorrhages and micro-aneurysms, usually associated with areas of retinal pericyte loss and loss of the endothelial cell barrier function. The resulting leakage can lead to macular edema, consisting of an accumulation of fluid and lipoproteins in the retina. Visual acuity declines dramatically when the central macula is affected.
The eyes of patients with diabetic macular edema are associated with highly elevated levels of plasma kallikrein, as well as VEGF, however the roles plasma kallikrein and VEGF are well understood to be independent of one another (Kita et al., Diabetes 2015).
The plasma kallikrein-kinin system is a system of blood proteins that plays a role in inflammation, blood pressure control, coagulation and pain. The plasma kallikrein-kinin system is abnormally abundant in patients with advanced diabetic macular edema. It has recently been published that plasma kallikrein contributes to retinal vascular dysfunctions in diabetic rats (A. Clermont et al. “Plasma kallikrein mediates retinal vascular dysfunction and induces retinal thickening in diabetic rats” Diabetes, 2011, 60, p 1590-98). Furthermore, administration of the plasma kallikrein inhibitor ASP-440 ameliorated both retinal vascular permeability and retinal blood flow abnormalities in diabetic rats. Therefore, a plasma kallikrein inhibitor should have utility as a treatment to reduce retinal vascular permeability associated with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Other complications of diabetes such as cerebral haemorrhage, nephropathy, cardiomyopathy and neuropathy, all of which have associations with plasma kallikrein may also be considered as targets for a plasma kallikrein inhibitor.
Synthetic and small molecule plasma kallikrein inhibitors have been described previously, for example by Garrett et al. (“Peptide aldehyde . . . ” J. Peptide Res. 52, p 62-71 (1998)), T. Griesbacher et al. (“Involvement of tissue kallikrein but not plasma kallikrein in the development of symptoms mediated by endogenous kinins in acute pancreatitis in rats” British Journal of Pharmacology 137, p 692-700 (2002)), Evans (“Selective dipeptide inhibitors of kallikrein” WO03/076458), Szelke et al. (“Kininogenase inhibitors” WO92/04371), D. M. Evans et al. (Immunolpharmacology, 32, p 115-116 (1996)), Szelke et al. (“Kininogen inhibitors” WO95/07921), Antonsson et al. (“New peptides derivatives” WO94/29335), J. Corte et al. (“Six membered heterocycles useful as serine protease inhibitors” WO2005/123680), J. Stürzbecher et al. (Brazilian J. Med. Biol. Res 27, p 1929-34 (1994)), Kettner et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,187,157), N. Teno et al. (Chem. Pharm. Bull. 41, p 1079-1090 (1993)), W. B. Young et al. (“Small molecule inhibitors of plasma kallikrein” Bioorg. Med. Chem. Letts. 16, p 2034-2036 (2006)), Okada et al. (“Development of potent and selective plasmin and plasma kallikrein inhibitors and studies on the structure-activity relationship” Chem. Pharm. Bull. 48, p 1964-72 (2000)), Steinmetzer et al. (“Trypsin-like serine protease inhibitors and their preparation and use” WO08/049595), Zhang et al. (“Discovery of highly potent small molecule kallikrein inhibitors” Medicinal Chemistry 2, p 545-553 (2006)), Sinha et al. (“Inhibitors of plasma kallikrein” WO08/016883), Shigenaga et al. (“Plasma Kallikrein Inhibitors” WO2011/118672), and Kolte et al. (“Biochemical characterization of a novel high-affinity and specific kallikrein inhibitor”, British Journal of Pharmacology (2011), 162(7), 1639-1649). Also, Steinmetzer et al. (“Serine protease inhibitors” WO2012/004678) describes cyclized peptide analogs which are inhibitors of human plasmin and plasma kallikrein.
To date, only two selective plasma kallikrein inhibitors have been approved for medical use: Ecallantide and Lanadelumab. Ecallantide is formulated as a solution for injection. It is a large protein plasma kallikrein inhibitor that presents a risk of anaphylactic reactions. Lanadelumab is a human monoclonal antibody, used in the prevention of angioedema in patients with hereditary angioedema, and is also formulated as a solution for injection. Neither Ecallantide nor Lanadelumab have been investigated or approved for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Other plasma kallikrein inhibitors known in the art are generally small molecules, some of which include highly polar and ionisable functional groups, such as guanidines or amidines. Recently, plasma kallikrein inhibitors that do not feature guanidine or amidine functionalities have been reported. For example Brandl et al. (“N-((6-amino-pyridin-3-yl)methyl)-heteroaryl-carboxamides as inhibitors of plasma kallikrein” WO2012/017020), Evans et al. (“Benzylamine derivatives as inhibitors of plasma kallikrein” WO2013/005045), Allan et al. (“Benzylamine derivatives” WO2014/108679), and Davie et al. (“Heterocyclic derivates” WO2014/188211).
Intravitreal injection of plasma kallikrein inhibitors is known (for example, see Evans et al. WO2013/005045) and allows the plasma kallikrein inhibitor to be delivered directly to the ocular tissues. However, small molecules dosed as solutions and administered by intravitreal injection are typically cleared from the vitreous within hours (for example, see “Review: Practical Issues in Intravitreal Drug Delivery”, Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Volume 17, Number 4, 2001, p 393-401, David Maurice and “Prediction of Vitreal Half-Life Based on Drug Physiochemical Properties: Quantitative Structure-Pharmacokinetic Relationships (QSPKR)”, Pharmaceutical Research, Volume 26, Number 5, 2009, p 1236-1260, Chandrasekar Durairaj et al.).
Intravitreal injection is an invasive procedure, and therefore reduced clearance and an extended duration of action are desirable to increase the period required between injections. Cook et al. (“Pharmaceutical compositions” WO2014/108685) discloses compositions containing suspended plasma kallikrein inhibitors with relatively long dissolution times, thus providing a relatively long period of action. However, a problem with pharmaceutical compositions containing suspended actives is that additional manufacturing steps are required, such as reducing the particle size of the active ingredient and controlling the particle size distribution of the active ingredient. There is also a risk of non-homogeneity of the suspension in the formulation.
Plasma kallikrein inhibitors with a longer duration of action are disclosed in WO2019/030540. These inhibitors do not have the disadvantages associated with a suspension of active ingredient. The pharmaceutical compositions comprising the disclosed plasma kallikrein inhibitors are suitable for injection into the eye, and have a long duration of action in the ocular tissues, particularly the retina.
Therapies for DME directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF therapies) have made a significant difference in the treatment of DME (Campochiaro, Aiello et al. 2016). The treatments currently in use, e.g. aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab and pegaptanib, were shown in clinical trials to be more effective than laser therapy after one year. However, a significant proportion (up to 50%) of patients with DME does not achieve vision gain under anti-VEGF therapy (Nguyen, Brown et al. 2012).
A treatment for DME can be measured for its efficacy by its impact on visual acuity. Visual acuity is the symptom of the disease observed by the patients, thus any change in the patient's visual acuity, or slowing of the progression of the deterioration of said visual acuity is an improvement in the treatment of the disease.
Therefore, there remains a need for alternative treatments for impaired visual acuity. There also remains a need for alternative treatments of diabetic macular edema. There also remains a need for treatments of diabetic macular edema and visual acuity that slow the progression of the condition, or prevent deterioration of the patient's condition.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a treatment of impaired visual acuity that slows the progression of the condition or prevents deterioration of the patient's condition.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a treatment of diabetic macular edema that slows the progression of the condition or prevents deterioration of the patient's condition.
Surprisingly, it has been found that intravitreal administration of a pharmaceutical composition which is a solution, preferably an aqueous solution, which comprises the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) is effective and well tolerated in patients with DME or impaired visual acuity. In this regard, the present invention provides an alternative option where a DME patient or a patient with impaired visual acuity is no longer clinically recommended to use a previous therapy, and the patient is not receiving the previous therapy, in particular an anti-VEGF therapy. For instance, the previous treatment with a different therapy, in particular anti-VEGF therapy, may no longer be clinically recommended because the previous therapy was not tolerated for whatever reason (e.g. because adverse effects have been experienced). Alternatively, or additionally, the previous treatment with a different therapy, in particular an anti-VEGF therapy, may no longer be clinically recommended because the previous treatment did not result in at least a slowing of the progression of the DME or impaired visual acuity. Surprisingly, this treatment has been found to be particularly effective where the patients are in the early stages of DME or impaired visual acuity. It has also been found that by administering an appropriate dose, it may be possible to reduce the frequency of intravitreal injections of the pharmaceutical composition of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) described herein required in order to prevent progression of the disease. Intravitreal injections are uncomfortable for the patient, and require administration by a medical professional (i.e. cannot be self-administered), therefore a reduction in the frequency of these intravitreal injections is advantageous.
The invention is defined by the appended claims.
In a first aspect, the present invention relates to a method for treating diabetic macular edema (DME) comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient has previously had anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) treatment.
The present invention also relates to a compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) for use in treating diabetic macular edema (DME) comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient has previously had anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) treatment.
The present invention also relates to a use of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient has previously had anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) treatment.
The pharmaceutical composition is preferably an aqueous solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The intravitreal administration preferably comprises intravitreal injection. The intravitreal administration is preferably into at least one of the patient's eyes. The intravitreal administration is may also be into both of the patient's eyes.
The formulation of the pharmaceutical composition is as defined below. Preferably, the pharmaceutical composition is an aqueous solution containing the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), histidine and trehalose dihydrate.
The pH of the composition is preferably from about 2 to about 10, more preferably from about 5 to about 7.5, even more preferably from about 5.3 to about 6, yet more preferably from about 5.4 to about 5.8 and most preferably about 5.5.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 300 μg/mL. Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 200 μg/mL. More preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 30 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. Yet more preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 60 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 30 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 60 μg/m L. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 100 μg/mL.
Up to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 10 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably between about 25 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably about 50 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration.
Preferably between about 50 μL to about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 60 μL to about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 70 μL to about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 80 μL to about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 90 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 50 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration.
The patient may be in the early stage of DME. The early stage of DME may be defined by the patient having a baseline visual acuity score (BCVA), prior to administration of the compound of Formula A, of between 56 and 73 letters in at least one eye, measured using the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
The treatment can comprise administering the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in combination with an anti-VEGF treatment. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be selected from aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib. The anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be administered in the same pharmaceutical composition as the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Alternatively, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be administered in a different pharmaceutical composition to the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). The different pharmaceutical compositions can be administered separately, sequentially or simultaneously.
Preferably, the treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) is a monotherapy for DME.
Preferably, the patient does not receive anti-VEGF treatment concurrent to administration of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment was for treating impaired visual acuity or DME. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment can be aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib.
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment commenced no more than 36 months before the treatment with the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Preferably, the patient received anti-VEGF treatment no less than 8 weeks before commencing treatment with the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered over any time period, and can be administered indefinitely or for life. Preferably, the treatment is administered over a time period of at least about 12 weeks.
The treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency. The first time period is preferably greater than about 8 weeks, and more preferably greater than about 12 weeks. The first dosing frequency can be between about once every three weeks and about once every five weeks. The second time period can be greater than about 8 weeks, greater than about 12 weeks, greater than about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 12 weeks or about 12 weeks. The second dosing frequency is preferably lower than about once every six weeks.
Alternatively, the treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered at a regular frequency of between about once every 4 weeks and about once every 12 weeks. Preferably, the treatment is administered about once every 4 weeks.
Preferably, treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) slows the progression of DME.
In a second aspect, the present invention relates to a method for treating impaired visual acuity comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient has previously had anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) treatment.
The present invention also relates to a compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) for use in treating impaired visual acuity comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient has previously had anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) treatment.
The present invention also relates to a use of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of impaired visual acuity, comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient has previously had anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) treatment.
The pharmaceutical composition is preferably an aqueous solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The intravitreal administration preferably comprises intravitreal injection. The intravitreal administration is preferably into at least one of the patient's eyes. The intravitreal administration is may also be into both of the patient's eyes.
The formulation of the pharmaceutical composition is as defined below. Preferably, the pharmaceutical composition is an aqueous solution containing the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), histidine and trehalose dihydrate.
The pH of the composition is preferably from about 2 to about 10, more preferably from about 5 to about 7.5, even more preferably from about 5.3 to about 6, yet more preferably from about 5.4 to about 5.8 and most preferably about 5.5.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 300 μg/mL. Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 200 μg/mL. More preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 30 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. Yet more preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 60 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 30 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 60 μg/m L. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 100 μg/mL.
Up to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 10 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably between about 25 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably about 50 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration.
Preferably between about 50 μL to about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 60 μL to about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 70 μL to about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 80 μL to about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 90 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 50 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration
The patient may be in the early stage of impaired visual acuity. The early stage of impaired visual acuity may be defined by the patient having a baseline visual acuity score (BCVA), prior to administration of the compound of Formula A, of between 56 and 73 letters in at least one eye, measured using the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
The treatment can comprise administering the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in combination with an anti-VEGF treatment. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be selected from aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib. The anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be administered in the same pharmaceutical composition as the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Alternatively, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be administered in a different pharmaceutical composition to the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). The different pharmaceutical compositions can be administered separately, sequentially or simultaneously.
Preferably, the treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) is a monotherapy for impaired visual acuity.
Preferably, the patient does not receive anti-VEGF treatment concurrent to administration of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment was for treating impaired visual acuity or DME. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment can be aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib.
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment commenced no more than 36 months before the treatment with the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Preferably, the patient received anti-VEGF treatment no less than 8 weeks before commencing treatment with the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered over any time period, and can be administered indefinitely or for life. Preferably, the treatment is administered over a time period of at least about 12 weeks.
The treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency. The first time period is preferably greater than about 8 weeks, and more preferably greater than about 12 weeks. The first dosing frequency can be between about once every three weeks and about once every five weeks. The second time period can be greater than about 8 weeks, greater than about 12 weeks, greater than about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 12 weeks or about 12 weeks. The second dosing frequency is preferably lower than about once every six weeks.
Alternatively, the treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered at a regular frequency of between about once every 4 weeks and about once every 12 weeks. Preferably, the treatment is administered about once every 4 weeks.
Preferably, treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) slows the progression of impaired visual acuity.
In a third aspect, the present invention relates to a method for treating diabetic macular edema (DME) comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient is in the early stages of DME.
The present invention also relates to a compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) for use in treating diabetic macular edema (DME) comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient is in the early stages of DME.
The present invention also relates to a use of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient is in the early stages of DME.
The pharmaceutical composition is preferably an aqueous solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The intravitreal administration preferably comprises intravitreal injection. The intravitreal administration is preferably into at least one of the patient's eyes. The intravitreal administration may also be into both of the patient's eyes.
The formulation of the pharmaceutical composition is as defined below. Preferably, the pharmaceutical composition is an aqueous solution containing the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), histidine and trehalose dihydrate.
The pH of the composition is preferably from about 2 to about 10, more preferably from about 5 to about 7.5, even more preferably from about 5.3 to about 6, yet more preferably from about 5.4 to about 5.8 and most preferably about 5.5.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 300 μg/mL. Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 200 μg/mL. More preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 30 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. Yet more preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 60 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 30 μg/m L. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 60 μg/m L. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 100 μg/mL.
Up to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 10 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably between about 25 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably about 50 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration.
Preferably between about 50 μL to about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 60 μL to about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 70 μL to about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 80 μL to about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 90 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 50 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration.
The patient is in the early stages of DME. The early stage of DME may be defined by the patient having a baseline visual acuity score (BCVA), prior to administration of the compound of Formula A, of between 56 and 73 letters in at least one eye, measured using the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
The treatment can comprise administering the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in combination with an anti-VEGF treatment. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be selected from aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib. The anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be administered in the same pharmaceutical composition as the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Alternatively, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be administered in a different pharmaceutical composition to the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). The different pharmaceutical compositions can be administered separately, sequentially or simultaneously.
Preferably, the treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) is a monotherapy for DME.
Preferably, the patient does not receive anti-VEGF treatment concurrent to administration of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The patient may previously have had anti-VEGF treatment.
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment was for treating impaired visual acuity or DME. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment can be aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib.
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment commenced no more than 36 months before the treatment with the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Preferably, the patient received anti-VEGF treatment no less than 8 weeks before commencing treatment with the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered over any time period, and can be administered indefinitely or for life. Preferably, the treatment is administered over a time period of at least about 12 weeks.
The treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency. The first time period is preferably greater than about 8 weeks, and more preferably greater than about 12 weeks. The first dosing frequency can be between about once every three weeks and about once every five weeks. The second time period can be greater than about 8 weeks, greater than about 12 weeks, greater than about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 12 weeks or about 12 weeks. The second dosing frequency is preferably lower than about once every six weeks.
Alternatively, the treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered at a regular frequency of between about once every 4 weeks and about once every 12 weeks. Preferably, the treatment is administered about once every 4 weeks.
Preferably, treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) slows the progression of DME.
In a fourth aspect, the present invention relates to a method for treating impaired visual acuity comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient is in the early stages of impaired visual acuity.
The present invention also relates to a compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) for use in treating impaired visual acuity comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient is in the early stages of impaired visual acuity.
The present invention also relates to a use of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of impaired visual acuity, comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the patient is in the early stages of impaired visual acuity.
The pharmaceutical composition is preferably an aqueous solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The intravitreal administration preferably comprises intravitreal injection. The intravitreal administration is preferably into at least one of the patient's eyes. The intravitreal administration is may also be into both of the patient's eyes.
The formulation of the pharmaceutical composition is as defined below. Preferably, the pharmaceutical composition is an aqueous solution containing the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), histidine and trehalose dihydrate.
The pH of the composition is preferably from about 2 to about 10, more preferably from about 5 to about 7.5, even more preferably from about 5.3 to about 6, yet more preferably from about 5.4 to about 5.8 and most preferably about 5.5.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 300 μg/mL. Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 200 μg/mL. More preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 30 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. Yet more preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 60 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 30 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 60 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be about 100 μg/mL.
Up to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 10 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably between about 25 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably about 50 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration.
Preferably between about 50 μL to about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 60 μL to about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 70 μL to about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 80 μL to about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 90 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 50 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration.
The patient is in the early stages of impaired visual acuity. The early stage of impaired visual acuity may be defined by the patient having a baseline visual acuity score (BCVA), prior to administration of the compound of Formula A, of between 56 and 73 letters in at least one eye, measured using the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
The treatment can comprise administering the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in combination with an anti-VEGF treatment. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib. The anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be selected from administered in the same pharmaceutical composition as the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Alternatively, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be administered in a different pharmaceutical composition to the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). The different pharmaceutical compositions can be administered separately, sequentially or simultaneously.
Preferably, the treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) is a monotherapy for impaired visual acuity.
Preferably, the patient does not receive anti-VEGF treatment concurrent to administration of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The patient may have had previous anti-VEGF treatment.
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment was for treating impaired visual acuity or DME. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment can be aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib.
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment commenced no more than 36 months before the treatment with the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Preferably, the patient received anti-VEGF treatment no less than 8 weeks before commencing treatment with the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered over any time period, and can be administered indefinitely or for life. Preferably, the treatment is administered over a time period of at least about 12 weeks.
The treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency. The first time period is preferably greater than about 8 weeks, and more preferably greater than about 12 weeks. The first dosing frequency can be between about once every three weeks and about once every five weeks. The second time period can be greater than about 8 weeks, greater than about 12 weeks, greater than about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 12 weeks or about 12 weeks. The second dosing frequency is preferably lower than about once every six weeks.
Alternatively, the treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) can be administered at a regular frequency of between about once every 4 weeks and about once every 12 weeks. Preferably, the treatment is administered about once every 4 weeks.
Preferably, treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) slows the progression of impaired visual acuity.
In a fifth aspect, the present invention relates to a method for treating diabetic macular edema (DME) comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the treatment is administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period wherein the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is greater than about 30 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency.
The present invention also relates to a compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) for use in treating diabetic macular edema (DME) comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the treatment is administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period wherein the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is greater than about 30 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency.
The present invention also relates to a use of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the treatment is administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period wherein the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is greater than about 30 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency.
Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the first time period is between about 60 μg/mL and about 300 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution. Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the first time period is between about 60 μg/mL and about 200 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution. Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the first time period is between about 60 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution. In particular, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the first time period may be about 60 μg/mL. In particular, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the first time period may be about 100 μg/mL.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 300 μg/mL. Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 200 μg/mL. More preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be between about 30 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. Yet more preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 60 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be about 30 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be about 60 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be about 100 μg/mL.
The first time period can be greater than about 24 weeks. Preferably, the first time period is greater than about 20 weeks. Preferably, the first time period is greater than about 16 weeks. Preferably, the first time period is greater than about 12 weeks. Most preferably, the first time period is greater than about 8 weeks.
The first time period can be between about 8 weeks and about 20 weeks. The first time period can be between about 8 weeks and about 16 weeks. The first time period can be between about 10 weeks and about 14 weeks. The first time period can be between about 10 weeks and about 12 weeks. The first time period can be about 12 weeks.
Preferably, the second time period can be greater than about 8 weeks, greater than about 12 weeks, greater than about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 12 weeks or about 12 weeks.
Preferably, the first dosing frequency is between about once every two weeks, and about once every 6 weeks. More preferably, the first dosing frequency is between about once every three weeks and about once every five weeks. Most preferably, the first dosing frequency is about once every 4 weeks.
The second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency. For example, the second dosing frequency may be about once every six weeks, about once every eight weeks, about once every ten weeks or about once every twelve weeks. Preferably, the second dosing frequency is lower than about once every six weeks. More preferably, the second dosing frequency is lower than about once every eight weeks. Most preferably, the second dosing frequency is lower than about once every 12 weeks.
The pharmaceutical composition is preferably an aqueous solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The intravitreal administration preferably comprises intravitreal injection. The intravitreal administration is preferably into at least one of the patient's eyes. The intravitreal administration is may also be into both of the patient's eyes.
The formulation of the pharmaceutical composition is as defined below. Preferably, the pharmaceutical composition is an aqueous solution containing the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), histidine and trehalose dihydrate.
The pH of the composition is preferably from about 2 to about 10, more preferably from about 5 to about 7.5, even more preferably from about 5.3 to about 6, yet more preferably from about 5.4 to about 5.8 and most preferably about 5.5.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution.
Up to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 10 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably between about 25 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably about 50 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration.
Preferably between about 50 μL to about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 60 μL to about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 70 μL to about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 80 μL to about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 90 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 50 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration.
The patient may be in the early stage of DME. The early stage of DME may be defined by the patient having a baseline visual acuity score (BCVA), prior to administration of the compound of Formula A, of between 56 and 73 letters in at least one eye, measured using the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
The treatment can comprise administering the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in combination with an anti-VEGF treatment. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be selected from aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib. The anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be administered in the same pharmaceutical composition as the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Alternatively, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be administered in a different pharmaceutical composition to the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). The different pharmaceutical compositions can be administered separately, sequentially or simultaneously.
Preferably, the treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) is a monotherapy for DME.
Preferably, the patient does not receive anti-VEGF treatment concurrent to administration of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The patient may have had previous anti-VEGF treatment.
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment was for treating impaired visual acuity or DME. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment can be aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib.
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment commenced no more than 36 months before the treatment with the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Preferably, the patient received anti-VEGF treatment no less than 8 weeks before commencing treatment with the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
Preferably, treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) slows the progression of DME.
In a sixth aspect, the present invention relates to a method for treating impaired visual acuity comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the treatment is administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period wherein the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is greater than about 30 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency.
The present invention also relates to a compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) for use in treating impaired visual acuity comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the treatment is administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period wherein the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is greater than about 30 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency.
The present invention also relates to a use of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of impaired visual acuity, comprising: intravitreally administering a pharmaceutical composition, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), to a patient in need thereof,
wherein the treatment is administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period wherein the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is greater than about 30 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency.
Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the first time period is between about 60 μg/mL and about 300 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution. Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the first time period is between about 60 μg/mL and about 200 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution. Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the first time period is between about 60 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution. In particular, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the first time period may be about 60 μg/mL. In particular, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the first time period may be about 100 μg/mL.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 300 μg/mL. Preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be between about 10 μg/mL and about 200 μg/mL. More preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be between about 30 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. Yet more preferably, the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered may be between about 60 μg/mL and about 100 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be about 30 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be about 60 μg/mL. The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered in the second time period may be about 100 μg/mL.
The first time period can be greater than about 24 weeks. Preferably, the first time period is greater than about 20 weeks. Preferably, the first time period is greater than about 16 weeks. Preferably, the first time period is greater than about 12 weeks. Most preferably, the first time period is greater than about 8 weeks.
The first time period can be between about 8 weeks and about 20 weeks. The first time period can be between about 8 weeks and about 16 weeks. The first time period can be between about 10 weeks and about 14 weeks. The first time period can be between about 10 weeks and about 12 weeks. The first time period can be about 12 weeks.
Preferably, the second time period is greater than about 8 weeks, greater than about 12 weeks, greater than about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 16 weeks, between about 8 weeks and about 12 weeks or about 12 weeks.
Preferably, the first dosing frequency is between about once every two weeks, and about once every 6 weeks. More preferably, the first dosing frequency is between about once every three weeks and about once every five weeks. Most preferably, the first dosing frequency is about once every 4 weeks.
The second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency. For example, the second dosing frequency may be about once every six weeks, about once every eight weeks, about once every ten weeks or about once every twelve weeks. Preferably, the second dosing frequency is lower than about once every six weeks. More preferably, the second dosing frequency is lower than about once every eight weeks. Most preferably, the second dosing frequency is lower than about once every 12 weeks.
The pharmaceutical composition is preferably an aqueous solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The intravitreal administration preferably comprises intravitreal injection. The intravitreal administration is preferably into at least one of the patient's eyes. The intravitreal administration is may also be into both of the patient's eyes.
The formulation of the pharmaceutical composition is as defined below. Preferably, the pharmaceutical composition is an aqueous solution containing the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof), histidine and trehalose dihydrate.
The pH of the composition is preferably from about 2 to about 10, more preferably from about 5 to about 7.5, even more preferably from about 5.3 to about 6, yet more preferably from about 5.4 to about 5.8 and most preferably about 5.5.
The concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution.
Up to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 10 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably between about 25 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. More preferably about 50 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration.
Preferably between about 50 μL to about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 60 μL to about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 70 μL to about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 80 μL to about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably between about 90 μL to about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 50 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 60 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 70 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 80 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 90 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration. Preferably, about 100 μL of the solution is administered per intravitreal administration.
The patient may be in the early stage of impaired visual acuity. The early stage of impaired visual acuity may be defined by the patient having a baseline visual acuity score (BCVA), prior to administration of the compound of Formula A, of between 56 and 73 letters in at least one eye, measured using the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
The treatment can comprise administering the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) in combination with an anti-VEGF treatment. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be selected from aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib. The anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be administered in the same pharmaceutical composition as the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Alternatively, the anti-VEGF treatment received in combination can be administered in a different pharmaceutical composition to the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). The different pharmaceutical compositions can be administered separately, sequentially or simultaneously.
Preferably, the treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) is a monotherapy for impaired visual acuity.
Preferably, the patient does not receive anti-VEGF treatment concurrent to administration of the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
The patient may have had previous anti-VEGF treatment.
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment was for treating impaired visual acuity or DME. For example, the anti-VEGF treatment can be aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib.
Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF treatment commenced no more than 36 months before the treatment with the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof). Preferably, the patient received anti-VEGF treatment no less than 8 weeks before commencing treatment with the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof).
Preferably, treatment with the pharmaceutical composition which is a solution comprising the compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) slows the progression of impaired visual acuity.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful for the treatment of impaired visual acuity. In particular, the uses and methods of the invention are useful for slowing the progression of impaired visual acuity. Impaired visual acuity encompasses any medical condition whose symptoms involve a decrease in visual acuity. For example, said impaired visual acuity may be measured by Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Examples of conditions with symptoms of impaired visual acuity include diabetic macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, retinal vascular permeability associated with diabetic retinopathy, retinal vascular occlusion, diabetes, macular degeneration and neuropathy.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful as a safe and tolerated treatment for impaired visual acuity.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful for the treatment of impaired visual acuity in patients that have previously had anti-VEGF treatment.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful for the treatment of impaired visual acuity in patients that have previously had anti-VEGF treatment for impaired visual acuity or DME.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful for the treatment of impaired visual acuity in patients that are in the early stages of impaired visual acuity. The early stages of impaired visual acuity may be characterised by having a baseline visual acuity BCVA value of between 56 and 73.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful for the treatment of impaired visual acuity where the treatment is administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period wherein the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is greater than about 30 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency.
In this regard, the uses and methods of the invention provide an alternative treatment for patients suffering from impaired visual acuity, in particular where patients have been previously treated with a different therapy (e.g. anti-VEGF) and that different therapy is no longer clinically recommended, and the patient is not receiving the different therapy concurrent to the treatment of the uses and methods of the invention. For instance, the previous treatment with a different therapy (e.g. anti-VEGF) may no longer be clinically recommended because the previous treatment was not tolerated for whatever reason (e.g. because adverse effects have been experienced). Alternatively, or additionally, the previous treatment with a different therapy (e.g. anti-VEGF) may no longer be clinically recommended because the previous treatment did not result in at least a slowing of the progression of the impaired visual acuity.
Particularly, the uses and methods of the invention provide an alternative treatment for patients suffering from impaired visual acuity, in particular where patients have been previously treated with an anti-VEGF therapy and the anti-VEGF therapy is no longer clinically recommended, and the patient is not receiving the different therapy concurrent to the treatment of the uses and methods of the invention. For instance, the previous anti-VEGF therapy may no longer be clinically recommended because the previous treatment was not tolerated for whatever reason (e.g. because adverse effects have been experienced). Alternatively, or additionally, the previous anti-VEGF therapy may no longer be clinically recommended because the previous treatment did not result in at least a slowing of the progression of the impaired visual acuity. Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF therapy was for treating impaired visual acuity and DME.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. In particular, the uses and methods of the invention are useful for slowing the progression of DME. In some embodiments, the uses and methods are useful for the treatment of microvascular complications of a disease state.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful as a safe and tolerated treatment for DME.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in patients that have previously had anti-VEGF treatment.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful for the treatment of DME in patients that have previously had anti-VEGF treatment for impaired visual acuity or DME.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in patients that are in the early stages of DME. The early stages of DME may be characterised by having a baseline visual acuity BCVA value of between 56 and 73.
The uses and methods of the invention are useful for the treatment of diabetic macular edema where the treatment is administered at a first dosing frequency over a first time period wherein the concentration of the compound of formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof) when administered is greater than about 30 μg/mL based on the concentration of the free base of the compound of formula A in solution, followed by a second dosing frequency over a second time period, wherein the second dosing frequency is lower than the first dosing frequency.
In this regard, the uses and methods of the invention provide an alternative treatment for patients suffering from DME, in particular where patients have been previously treated with a different therapy (e.g. anti-VEGF) and that different therapy is no longer clinically recommended, and the patient is not receiving the different therapy concurrent to the treatment of the uses and methods of the invention. For instance, the previous treatment with a different therapy (e.g. anti-VEGF) may no longer be clinically recommended because the previous treatment was not tolerated for whatever reason (e.g. because adverse effects have been experienced). Alternatively, or additionally, the previous treatment with a different therapy (e.g. anti-VEGF) may no longer be clinically recommended because the previous treatment did not result in at least a slowing of the progression of the DME.
Particularly, the uses and methods of the invention provide an alternative treatment for patients suffering from DME, in particular where patients have been previously treated with an anti-VEGF therapy and the anti-VEGF therapy is no longer clinically recommended, and the patient is not receiving the different therapy concurrent to the treatment of the uses and methods of the invention. For instance, the previous anti-VEGF therapy may no longer be clinically recommended because the previous treatment was not tolerated for whatever reason (e.g. because adverse effects have been experienced). Alternatively, or additionally, the previous anti-VEGF therapy may no longer be clinically recommended because the previous treatment did not result in at least a slowing of the progression of the DME. Preferably, the previous anti-VEGF therapy was for treating impaired visual acuity and DME.
The uses and methods of the invention involve intravitreal administration. Accordingly, the compound of Formula A is administered into the eye. The compound of Formula A may be administered into one eye, at least one eye, or into both eyes.
Suitable devices for parenteral administration include needle (including microneedle) injectors, needle-free injectors and infusion techniques.
The uses and methods may involve administering the compound of Formula A in the form of sterile aqueous solutions. The preparation of parenteral formulations under sterile conditions, for example, by lyophilisation and reconstitution, may readily be accomplished using standard pharmaceutical techniques well known to those skilled in the art. For example, a suitable method for sterilising the compositions of the present invention may be terminal sterilisation, or sterile filtration followed by aseptic fill-finish. The terminal sterilisation method, sterile filtration and aseptic processing are described in US Pharmacopeia USP<1211> Sterilization and Sterility Assurance of Compendial Articles and terminal sterilisation is further described in US Pharmacopeia USP<1222> Terminally Sterilized Pharmaceutical Products-Parametric Release. (See United States Pharmacopeia (USP) 37, NF 32).
The compositions may be administered to the patient under the supervision of an attending physician.
In any of the treatments of the invention described herein, the patient is preferably a human. DME can affect patients of all ages. Accordingly, the human patient can be a child (ages 0 to 18 years) or an adult (18 years old or older).
The active ingredient is a plasma kallikrein inhibitor, which is the compound of Formula A:
The compound of Formula A is N—[(R)-1-[(S)-1-(4-Aminomethyl-benzylcarbamoyl)-2-phenyl-ethylcarbamoyl]-2-(4-ethoxy-phenyl)-ethyl]-benzamide.
The compound of Formula A may also be referred to as N—((R)-1-(((S)-1-((4-(aminomethyl)benzyl)amino)-1-oxo-3-phenylpropan-2-yl)amino)-3-(4-ethoxyphenyl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)benzamide.
The invention is to be understood not to be limited by the identity of the solid compound of Formula A used to prepare the formulation for administration. Moreover, the formulation of the compound of Formula A involves formulation as a solution, and as such the identity of the solid form used to prepare said solution has no bearing on the invention; the free base of the compound of Formula A is the active ingredient. The hydrochloride salt solid form is used in the preparative methods in the examples of the present invention. However, it is within the scope of the present invention to use any solid form, including any solid form of any salt, solvate, or hydrate to prepare the formulation of the compound of Formula A. It is also within the scope of the present invention to use any solid form of any salt and/or solvate (i.e. salt, solvate or solvate of a salt) to prepare the formulation of the compound of Formula A.
The uses and methods of the invention involve intravitreal administration of the compound of Formula A. Preferably, the uses and methods of the invention involve intravitreal administration of a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of Formula A. More preferably, the pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of Formula A is an aqueous solution comprising the compound of Formula A.
As used herein, any reference to the compound of Formula A in its administration, i.e. in a formulation, composition, or pharmaceutical composition, refers to the administration of the compound of Formula A for use in the uses and the methods of the invention as outlined above.
The uses and methods preferably involve administration of a pharmaceutical composition, in particular aqueous solutions. Preferably, the pharmaceutical composition meets the requirements of USP <788> (Particulate matter in injections) for a small-volume injection with a container volume of 2 mL when measured using the microscopic particle count test. The acceptance limits provided in USP <788> for a small-volume injection using the microscopic particle count test are that the number of particles present (actual or calculated) in each discrete unit tested or in each pooled sample tested does not exceed 3000 per container equal to or greater than 10 μm, and does not exceed 300 per container equal to or greater than 25 μm.
More preferably, the pharmaceutical composition meets the requirements of USP <788> (Particulate matter in injections) for a large-volume injection when measured using the microscopic particle count test. The acceptance limits provided in USP <788> for a large-volume injection using the microscopic particle count test are that the number of particles present (actual or calculated) in each discrete unit tested or in each pooled sample tested does not exceed 12 per mL equal to or greater than 10 μm, and does not exceed 2 per mL equal to or greater than 25 μm.
More preferably, the pharmaceutical composition meets the requirements of USP <789> (Particulate matter in ophthalmic solutions) when measured using the microscopic particle count test. The acceptance limits provided in USP <789> using the microscopic particle count test are that the average number of particles present in the units tested does not exceed 50 per mL equal to or greater than 10 μm, and does not exceed 5 per mL equal to or greater than 25 μm, and does not exceed 2 per mL equal to or greater than 50 μm.
The references to USP <788> and USP <789> herein refer to USP <788> and USP <789> in United States Pharmacopeia (USP) 37, NF 32.
The compositions can be aqueous. However, the compositions can be pre-formulated as a sterile, non-aqueous solution or in a dried form which can be subsequently reconstituted with a suitable aqueous vehicle (e.g. sterile, pyrogen-free water). The composition may be provided as a bulk solution which is further diluted, for example with sterile, pyrogen-free water, prior to use.
The compositions may be hypotonic, isotonic or hypertonic. The compositions typically have an osmolality of from about 250 to about 350 mOsmol/kg. For example, the compositions may have an osmolality of 250, 260, 270, 280, 290, 300, 310, 320, 330, 340 or 350 mOsmol/kg.
The compositions will typically be at a pH of from about 2 to about 10, e.g. pH 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10. The pH of the composition is preferably from about 2 to about 10, more preferably from about 5 to about 7.5, even more preferably from about 5.3 to about 6, yet more preferably from about 5.4 to about 5.8 and most preferably about 5.5.
Typically, the active ingredient, i.e. the compound of Formula A, is present in the composition at a concentration of from about 10 μg/mL to about 300 μg/mL, or from about 10 μg/mL to about 250 μg/mL, or from about 10 μg/mL to about 200 μg/mL, or from about 20 μg/mL to about 200 μg/mL, or from about 20 μg/mL to about 160 μg/mL, or from about 20 μg/mL to about 120 μg/mL, or from about 20 μg/mL to about 100 μg/mL. In a preferred embodiment the active ingredient, i.e. the compound of formula A, is present in the composition at a concentration of from about 30 μg/mL to about 100 μg/mL. Also, preferably the active ingredient, i.e. the compound of Formula A, is present in the composition of from about 30 μg/mL to about 60 μg/mL. More preferably, the active ingredient, i.e. the compound of Formula A, is present in the composition of from about 60 μg/mL to about 100 μg/mL Typically, the active ingredient, i.e. the compound of Formula A, is present in the composition at a concentration of about 30 μg/mL, about 60 μg/mL, about 100 μg/mL, about 120 μg/mL, or about 200 μg/mL, or about 250 μg/mL, or about 300 μg/mL. The concentrations specified refer to the concentration of the free base of the compound of Formula A in the composition. The free base of the compound of Formula A has the structure depicted in Formula A.
The concentration of the compound of Formula A is the concentration as administered. For example, this is the concentration of the compound of Formula A at the point at which it is administered to a patient. In particular, it is the concentration at the point that it is intravitreally injected. The formulation of the compound of Formula A is generally a pharmaceutical composition. The pharmaceutical composition is a solution, which may be preferably an aqueous solution.
The compound of Formula A used in the invention may be isolated in the form of its pharmaceutically acceptable salts, such as those described herein. The pharmaceutically acceptable salt is typically a hydrochloride salt.
The compound of Formula A may be intravitreally administered, i.e. injection into the eye. The compound of Formula A may be provided with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. The term ‘excipient’ is used herein to describe any ingredient other than the active ingredient which may impart either a functional (e.g. injectability, stability enhancing, drug release rate controlling) and/or a non-functional (e.g. processing aid or diluent) characteristic to the formulations. The choice of excipient will to a large extent depend on factors such as the particular mode of administration, the effect of the excipient on solubility and stability, and the nature of the dosage form.
The compound of Formula A may be provided with at least one buffer. The use of a buffer can minimize fluctuations in pH, which may improve stability and/or improve the tolerability of the composition in a subject upon administration. Suitable buffers that can be used in the compositions of the invention include histidine, acetate, citrate, cacodylate, bis-tris, maleate, piperazine, MES (2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid), tartrate, lactate; succinate; sulfate; phosphate; alanine; imidazole; arginine and asparagine. Typically, the buffer is selected from histidine, maleate and citrate. Preferably, the buffer is histidine. The pH of the buffer will typically be between about 2 and about 10, e.g. about pH 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10. The pH of the buffer is preferably from about 2 to about 10, more preferably from about 5 to about 7.5, even more preferably from about 5.3 to about 6, yet more preferably from about 5.4 to about 5.8 and most preferably about 5.5.
The pH of the buffer may be adjusted by the addition of an acid or a base. For example, the pH of the buffer may be adjusted with hydrochloric acid. The buffers referred to are also intended to include salts of the buffer. For example, histidine buffer includes histidine hydrochloride buffer.
The compound of Formula A may be administered with a buffer in an amount from about 0.0001% to about 1%, or from about 0.001% to about 0.32%, optionally from about 0.01% to about 0.16%. The compound of Formula A may be administered with a buffer in an amount from about 0.01% to about 0.08% by weight of the composition. Typically, the compound of Formula A may be administered with a buffer in an amount of about 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03% or 0.04% by weight of the composition.
The compound of Formula A may be administered with at least one non-ionic tonicity agent. The use of a non-ionic tonicity agent can aid control of the osmolality of the composition. The non-ionic tonicity agent is typically a carbohydrate and is preferably a sugar. The non-ionic tonicity agent may be selected from the group comprising glycerine; sugars, e.g. glucose, mannitol, sorbitol, trehalose, dextrose, lactose, maltose, fructose, sucrose, and inositol; hydroxyethyl starch, e.g. hetastarch and pentastarch. The non-ionic tonicity agent is typically trehalose. Preferably, the non-ionic tonicity agent is trehalose.
The compound of Formula A may be administered histidine as the buffer and trehalose as the non-ionic tonicity agent.
The compound of Formula A may be administered as a hypotonic, isotonic or hypertonic formulation. It may be desirable that a formulation for intravitreal injection is isotonic to the vitreous, i.e. has the same effective osmolality as the vitreous, so as not to disrupt the fluid balance of the vitreous and surrounding tissues.
The compound of Formula A may be administered with a non-ionic tonicity agent in an amount from about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of the composition, e.g. about 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2.5%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% or 30% by weight of the composition. The compound of Formula A may be administered with a non-ionic tonicity agent in an amount from about 1% to about 20%, or from about 5% to about 15%, or from about 7% to about 12% by weight of the composition, or from about 8% to about 10% by weight of the composition. Typically, the compound of Formula A may be administered with a non-ionic tonicity agent in an amount of about 8%, 9% or 10% by weight of the composition.
The compound of Formula A may be administered in a formulation with an osmolality of from about 250 to about 350 mOsmol/kg. For example, the formulations may have an osmolality of 250, 260, 270, 280, 290, 300, 310, 320, 330, 340 or 350 mOsmol/kg. The skilled person will understand that the amount of non-ionic tonicity agent used may vary depending on the particular choice of agent and on the other components in the composition.
The compound of Formula A may be administered with a non-ionic surfactant, such as carboxylic esters, polyethylene glycol esters, glycol esters of fatty acids, ethoxylated aliphatic alcohols, polyoxyethelene surfactants, sorbitol esters, ethoxylated derivatives of sorbitol esters, glycol esters of fatty acids, and poloxamers. Polyoxyethelene surfactants include polyoxyethylenesorbitan fatty acid esters, which are also referred to as polysorbates, e.g. polysorbate 80 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, Tween® 80), polysorbate 40 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monopalmitate, Tween® 40) and polysorbate 20 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate, Tween® 20). Preferably, the non-ionic surfactant is a polyoxyethylenesorbitan fatty acid ester. More preferably, the non-ionic surfactant is polysorbate 20.
Alternatively, the compound of Formula A may be administered in a formulation that is free, or substantially free, of non-ionic surfactants, such as carboxylic esters, polyethylene glycol esters, glycol esters of fatty acids, ethoxylated aliphatic alcohols, polyoxyethelene surfactants, sorbitol esters, ethoxylated derivatives of sorbitol esters, glycol esters of fatty acids, and poloxamers. Polyoxyethelene surfactants include polyoxyethylenesorbitan fatty acid esters, which are also referred to as polysorbates, e.g. polysorbate 80 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, Tween® 80), polysorbate 40 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monopalmitate, Tween® 40) and polysorbate 20 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate, Tween® 20). The compositions of the invention are preferably free of polysorbate, e.g. polysorbate 20.
The compound of Formula A may be administered with histidine as the buffer and trehalose as the non-ionic tonicity agent and may optionally be free, or substantially free, of polysorbate, e.g. polysorbate 20.
The compound of Formula A may be administered with an antioxidant, such as acetone, sodium bisulfite, butylated hydroxy anisole, butylated hydroxy toluene, cysteine, cysteinate HCl, dithionite sodium, gentisic acid, gentisic acid ethanolamine, glutamate monosodium, formaldehyde sulfoxylate sodium, metabisulfite potassium, metabisulfite sodium, monothioglycerol, propyl gallate, sulfite sodium, thioglycolate sodium or ascorbic acid. Alternatively, in particular for intraocular use of the composition, packaging may be configured in a manner that controls the potential for oxidation of the composition, including for example purging with an inert gas during manufacture.
The compound of Formula A may be formulated in any method suitable for intravitreal administration, for example in the formulations described above. These formulations may be prepared by standard procedures that would be well known and understood by the person skilled in the art.
The compound of Formula A may be formulated by a method involving the steps of:
Preferably, the water used in step (a) is sterile water for injection.
The method may further comprise the step of:
Preferably, the sterilisation in step (d) is performed by sterile filtration.
A further method for preparing the formulations suitable for use in the invention, comprises adding water to a non-aqueous formulation comprising at least one non-ionic tonicity agent, at least one buffer and an active ingredient, wherein said active ingredient is a compound of Formula A or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and wherein the at least one non-ionic tonicity agent, the at least one buffer, and the compound of Formula A are as defined herein.
Any solid form of the compound of Formula A may be used in preparing the formulation. The formulation may be provided as a solution formulation.
It would be readily understood that the invention is not limited to the use of specific solid forms. Any other solid form could also be used to prepare solution formulations of the compound of Formula A.
The term “aqueous” means that the composition includes water as a solvent. Typically, the content of water in the composition is greater than or equal to about 35% by weight, preferably more than about 50% by weight of the composition, e.g. more than about 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98% or 99% by weight of the composition.
The term “comprising” encompasses “including” as well as “consisting” e.g. a composition “comprising” X may consist exclusively of X or may include something additional e.g. X+Y.
The word “substantially” does not exclude “completely” e.g. a composition which is “substantially free” from Y may be completely free from Y. Where necessary, the word “substantially” may be omitted from the definition of the invention.
The term “about” in relation to a numerical quantities x (excluding measurements of time) is optional and means, for example, x±10%.
The term “about” in relation to measurements of weeks is optional and means, for example “4 weeks ±1 week”. More specifically, the term “about” in relation to a measurements of weeks is optional and means, for example “4 weeks ±3 days”.
“Pharmaceutically acceptable salt” means a physiologically or toxicologically tolerable salt and includes, when appropriate, pharmaceutically acceptable base addition salts and pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts. For example (i) where a compound contains one or more acidic groups, for example carboxy groups, pharmaceutically acceptable base addition salts that can be formed include sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium and ammonium salts, or salts with organic amines, such as, diethylamine, N-methyl-glucamine, diethanolamine or amino acids (e.g. lysine) and the like; (ii) where a compound contains a basic group, such as an amino group, pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts that can be formed include hydrochlorides, hydrobromides, sulfates, phosphates, acetates, citrates, lactates, tartrates, mesylates, succinates, oxalates, phosphates, esylates, tosylates, benzenesulfonates, naphthalenedisulphonates, maleates, adipates, fumarates, hippurates, camphorates, xinafoates, p-acetamidobenzoates, dihydroxybenzoates, hydroxynaphthoates, succinates, ascorbates, oleates, bisulfates and the like.
Hemisalts of acids and bases can also be formed, for example, hemisulfate and hemicalcium salts.
For a review of suitable salts, see “Handbook of Pharmaceutical Salts: Properties, Selection and Use” by Stahl and Wermuth (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2002).
It will be understood that “pharmaceutically acceptable salts and/or solvates thereof” means “pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof”, “pharmaceutically acceptable solvates thereof”, and “pharmaceutically acceptable solvates of salts thereof”.
Where compounds used in the compositions of the invention exist in one or more geometrical, optical, enantiomeric, diastereomeric and tautomeric forms, including but not limited to cis- and trans-forms, E- and Z-forms, R-, S- and meso-forms, keto-, and enol-forms, then, unless otherwise stated, a reference to a particular compound includes all such isomeric forms, including racemic and other mixtures thereof. Where appropriate such isomers can be separated from their mixtures by the application or adaptation of known methods (e.g. chromatographic techniques and recrystallisation techniques). Where appropriate such isomers can be prepared by the application or adaptation of known methods (e.g. asymmetric synthesis).
A reference to a particular compound also includes all isotopic variants, including deuterated variants.
In the context of the present invention, references herein to “treatment” include references to curative, palliative, prophylaxis, a prevention of worsening of the condition/indication/disease, a protective treatment, a slowing of the progression of the condition/indication/disease, or a slowing of the onset of the condition/indication/disease. The noun “treatment” may be used interchangeably with the verb “to treat”, with the same meaning.
“anti-VEGF treatment” and “anti-VEGF therapy” may be used interchangeably throughout. Anti-VEGF treatment comprises any treatment that comprises administration of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Examples of such anti-VEGF therapies include the use of aflibercept (Eylea®), bevacizumab, ranibizumab and pegaptanib. Anti-VEGF treatment, as used herein refers to anti-VEGF therapy for use in the treatment of any condition. Particularly, anti-VEGF therapy refers to anti-VEGF therapy for use in treatment of any condition by intravitreal injection. Preferably, anti-VEGF therapy refers to anti-VEGF therapy for DME, or impaired visual acuity.
“AE” as used herein refers to adverse events, and has the usual clinical meaning that would be readily understood by the person skilled in the art.
The term “Diabetic macular edema” or “DME” would be readily understood by the skilled person, and includes all types of DME. DME may be used interchangeably with the term center-involving DME (ciDME). “Edema” may also be referred to as “Oedema”, and both terms may be used interchangeably throughout.
The term “impaired visual acuity” encompasses any medical condition whose symptoms involve a decrease in visual acuity. For example, said impaired visual acuity may be measured by Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Examples of conditions with symptoms of impaired visual acuity include diabetic macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, retinal vascular permeability associated with diabetic retinopathy, retinal vascular occlusion, diabetes, macular degeneration and neuropathy.
As used herein, a number of characteristic indicators may be used to assess the symptoms of DME or impaired visual acuity. For example, visual acuity, which may assessed as Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), measured by the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, values can indicate DME or impaired visual acuity. Presence of DME or impaired visual acuity is measured in patients at baseline. For example, a BCVA score of ≥19 and ≤73 letters in the eye which is implicated may be symptomatic of DME or impaired visual acuity.
Alternatively, a BCVA score 19 and 55 letters may be symptomatic of DME or impaired visual acuity.
The “early stages of DME” may be defined by patients who, at baseline, have a BCVA score of ≥56 and ≤73. This may also be referred to interchangeably as “early onset of DME”. The “early stages of impaired visual acuity” may be defined by patients who, at baseline, have a BCVA score of ≥56 and ≤73. This may also be referred to interchangeably as “early onset of impaired visual acuity”.
The “compound of Formula A” as used herein is to be understood to refer to the “compound of Formula A (or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and/or solvate thereof)”.
The term “baseline”, in reference to any measurement of a value, refers to the measurement of that value before any treatment has commenced.
“μg” refers to the measurement of micrograms, and may be used interchangeably with “ug”.
The term “dosing frequency” refers to the number of doses given in a unit period of time. Therefore, a reduced or lower dosing frequency refers to any of:
The term “dose” may be used interchangeably with any reference to “an intravitreal administration”, which can, for example, refer to an intravitreal injection.
As used herein, visual acuity scores are measured as a Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) using the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. The procedure for measuring BCVA using the ETDRS chart is outlined in Ophthalmology 1991; 98:741-756, with reference to Ferris F L III et al “New visual acuity charts for clinical research” Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 94:91-6.
The invention is further illustrated by the following examples. It will be appreciated that the examples are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the invention as described above. Modification of detail may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. In the following examples, the following abbreviations and definitions are used:
Osmolality was determined using a calibrated osmometer in compliance with USP<785> (freezing point depression). (See United States Pharmacopeia (USP) 37, NF 32).
Particulate matter in the pharmaceutical compositions was measured using the microscopic particle count test described in USP <789> (Particulate matter in ophthalmic solutions) (See United States Pharmacopeia (USP) 37, NF 32).
The compound of Formula A may be prepared according to the method described in Evans et al. (“Benzylamine derivatives as inhibitors of plasma kallikrein” WO2013/005045). N—[(R)-1-[(S)-1-(4-Aminomethyl-benzylcarbamoyl)-2-phenyl-ethylcarbamoyl]-2-(4-ethoxy-phenyl)-ethyl]-benzamide hydrochloride, the hydrochloride salt of the compound of Formula A, can be manufactured using methods disclosed in WO2014/006414. The structure of the compound of Formula A is shown below:
Concentrations and dose levels defined in the examples below are based on the amount of free base of the compound of Formula A.
As outlined below, the compound of Formula A is prepared as a solution formulation. Therefore, any solid form of the compound of Formula A may be used in preparing the solution formulation.
It would readily understood that the invention is not limited to the use of specific solid forms and any other solid form could also be used to prepare solution formulations of the compound of Formula A.
Preparative Compositions of 10, 30, 100 and 300 μg/mL Solution Formulations of the Compound of Formula a
A 9.8% w/w trehalose and 2 mM histidine buffer solution is prepared by dissolving L-histidine (1.09 g) and trehalose dihydrate (356.7 g) in SWFI (3270 g) with agitation. The buffer pH is adjusted using 1.0N HCl solution as needed and diluted to 3640 g with SWFI to yield the buffer solution. Compound of Formula A (0.340 g) is dissolved in the trehalose-histidine buffer (2800 g) solution with high energy rotor stator mixing at 40° C. for sufficient time to provide a visibly clear, colorless solution, approximately 15-30 min. The pH of the solution is adjusted as needed with 1.0N HCl solution. HPLC is used to determine concentration of the compound of Formula A in the solution and the solution is diluted as needed with the trehalose-histidine buffer solution. The resulting 100 μg/mL solution formulation of the compound of Formula A is sterile filtered through two PVDF sterile filtration modules in series into a sterile, depyrogenated pyrex glass container.
10, 30 and 300 μg/mL solution formulations of the compound of Formula A were prepared analogously with a common buffer and with the amount of the compound of Formula A being varied. For example, 0.104 g of the compound of Formula A was used to prepare the 30 μg/mL solution and 0.0363 g of the compound of Formula A was used to prepare the 10 μg/mL solution formulations.
Table 1 below provides analytical and characterization data for the 10, 30 and 100 μg/mL solution formulations of the compound of Formula A.
The 10, 30, 100 and 300 μg/mL solution formulations of the compound of Formula A are stable when filled into 2 mL clear type 1 glass vials sealed with chlorobutyl rubber stoppers, as shown by the data in Table 2
+RH = relative humidity
Preparative Compositions of 30, 60 and 200 μg/mL Solution Formulations of the Compound of Formula A
A 9.8% w/w trehalose and 2 mM histidine buffer solution is prepared by dissolving L-histidine monohydrochloride monohydrate (1.33 g), trehalose dihydrate (407.7 g) and L-histidine (0.26 g) in SWFI (3536 g) with agitation. Additional SWFI is added to bring the weight to 4160 g and the mixture agitated. N—[(R)-1-[(S)-1-(4-aminomethyl-benzylcarbamoyl)-2-phenyl-ethylcarbamoyl]-2-(4-ethoxy-phenyl)-ethyl]-benzamide hydrochloride (the hydrochloride salt of the compound of Formula A) (0.066 g) is dissolved in the trehalose-histidine buffer (2080 g) solution with high energy rotor stator mixing at 50° C. for sufficient time to provide a visibly clear, colorless solution, approximately 15-30 min. The pH of the solution is adjusted as needed with 1.0N HCl solution. HPLC is used to determine concentration of the compound of Formula A in the solution and the solution is diluted as needed with the trehalose-histidine buffer solution. The resulting 30 μg/mL solution formulation of the compound of Formula A is sterile filtered through two PVDF sterile filtration modules in series into a sterile, depyrogenated pyrex glass container.
60 μg/mL solution formulation of the compound of Formula A was prepared analogously with a common buffer and with 0.131 g of the compound of Formula A being used instead. 200 μg/mL solution formulation of the compound of Formula A was prepared analogously with a common buffer and with 0.436 g of the compound of Formula A being used instead.
Table 3 below provides analytical and characterization data for the 30, 60 and 200 μg/mL μg/mL solution formulations of the compound of Formula A.
+RH = relative humidity
Study—an Open Label, Single Ascending Dose Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of the Compound of Formula A Administered by Intravitreal Injection in Subjects with Center Involved Diabetic Macular Edema and Reduced Vision
The primary objective of the trial was to evaluate the local and systemic safety and tolerability of single ascending doses administered via intravitreal injection of the compound of Formula A in adult male and female subjects with central involved diabetic macular edema.
The secondary objectives were:
Part 1 of the study had a single ascending dose design with up to 4 groups, with 3 subjects per group.
Following the signing of informed consent, subjects attended the clinic where screening assessments were recorded (Clinic Visit 1). When deemed eligible, subjects attended the clinic where baseline measurements were recorded (recorded as Day 0, Clinic Visit 2). Following confirmation of eligibility and the taking of baseline ophthalmic measurements, a single intravitreal injection of the compound of Formula A, was administered to the study eye as per Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) protocol.
Each subject returned on Day 1, 7, 14, 28 and 56 for safety and ophthalmic assessment. Pharmacokinetic assessment was also taken. In addition, the subject was contacted by the Study Site on Day 3 (+1-1 day) by telephone to inquire about the subject's visual wellbeing and to ask about any adverse events.
An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) oversaw the conduct of the study.
Once the highest safe and tolerated (or practical) dose had been established, the study proceeded to Part 2 in which 5 additional subjects were treated with the established highest safe and tolerated (or practical) dose according to the same protocol with the same procedures performed as described for subjects enrolled into Part 1.
The compound of Formula A for intravitreal injection.
Single 100 μL intravitreal injection of:
Criteria for evaluation
Although it was not an eligibility requirement for this study, all the subjects had previously received anti-VEGF treatment in the study eye and the majority had received additional treatments including photocoagulation and intravitreal steroids.
Overall, 10 of the 14 subjects (71%) reported at least one adverse event. Severe events (1 patient) and study drug-related events (2 patients) were, however, uncommon. There were no deaths or other serious adverse events, nor did any event lead to withdrawal from the study. The majority of adverse events were consistent with those that would be expected from intravitreal injection. The most notable adverse event in the study was an episode of acute ocular pain immediately following injection secondary to a clinical diagnosis of acute increase in intraocular pressure. This diagnosis was supported by the rapid improvement in symptoms following anterior paracentesis.
There was no apparent deterioration in either mean visual acuity or mean retinal thickness. In contrast, trends of improvement in both mean visual acuity and mean retinal thickness occurred post-injection. Review of adverse events, laboratory results, ECG and physical examinations, revealed no evidence of any adverse systemic effect.
There was no evidence of any adverse effect associated with systemic exposure.
Plasma concentrations of the compound of Formula A were quantifiable (greater than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), 0.25 μg/mL) in at least one sample in all subjects. Plasma concentrations of the compound of Formula A ranged from <0.25 μg/mL to 1.63 μg/mL and were quantifiable for up to 4 hours post intravitreal injection of 1 μg/eye of compound of Formula A. For the 3 μg/eye dose of the compound of Formula A, plasma concentrations of the compound of Formula A ranged from <0.25 μg/mL to 2.35 μg/mL and were quantifiable up to 24 hours post dosing. Plasma concentrations of the compound of Formula A ranged from <0.25 μg/mL to 11.3 μg/mL and were quantifiable up to 24 hours post dosing of the 10 μg/eye of compound of Formula A.
Overall, higher plasma levels of the compound of Formula A were recorded in subjects receiving the higher doses. However, it was noted that the recorded plasma levels were exceptionally low, and the ability to quantify at these levels was testament to the sensitivity of the assay. Given the known required levels for in vitro pharmacological activity of plasma kallikrein inhibition, it was considered improbable that intravitreal injection would ever result in pharmacologically meaningful systemic exposures.
Following a single injection of the compound of Formula A as an average across all dose groups, there was a small but steady mean improvement in visual acuity at each follow up visit follow up to Day 84 (12 out of 14 subjects completed up to day 84) when all subjects were included regardless of dose. Visual acuity improved by 0.7, 1.0, 1.9, 2.8 and 4.1 letters compared with baseline at Days 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84 respectively. The mean improvement at Day 84 was greater for the 10 μg dose (5.5 letters improvement) compared with 1 μg (3.3 letters improvement) and 3 μg (2.0 letters improvement) which, although there was a small sample size, is possibly suggestive of a dose-dependent effect.
Intravitreal injection of the compound of Formula A was well tolerated. The small number of adverse events were consistent with the route of administration rather than any observed specific drug effects. From an efficacy perspective, there was a small improvement in mean visual acuity and reduction in mean retinal thickness across the whole study population, but the small numbers and the absence of a control group preclude formal interpretation.
The results were sufficiently encouraging to warrant further investigation of the compound of Formula A in the treatment of DME in an appropriately powered, repeat-dose controlled clinical study.
Study 2—Study in Human Subjects with Center-Involving Diabetic Macular Edema (ciDME) Who have had Prior Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Treatment
To investigate monthly dosing of intravitreal (IVT) injection of the compound of Formula A in subjects with ciDME who have had prior anti-VEGF treatment. In particular, to evaluate any effect on the efficacy in the treatment, prevention, or prevention of worsening of ciDME in subjects who have had prior anti-VEGF treatment.
To evaluate the local and systemic safety and tolerability of monthly dosing of the injections of the compound of Formula A in subjects with ciDME who had had prior anti-VEGF treatment.
This study was a randomized, sham-controlled, double-masked, 3-arm study into efficacy, safety and tolerability of monthly intravitreal injections of the compound of Formula A as a monotherapy in adult subjects with ciDME. The subjects had all had prior anti-VEGF treatment.
129 adult subjects were chosen using the following inclusion criteria:
Subjects were excluded from the trial if they met any of the following criteria:
The study eye was defined as the eye that meets all of the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. If both eyes qualified, the eye with the worse BCVA ETDRS at Day 1 was used as the study eye. If both eyes had the same BCVA ETDRS at Day 1, the eye with the highest CST on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) on Day 1, as assessed by the Investigator, was used as the study eye. If both eyes qualified and neither was preferred based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria and had the same BCVA ETDRS and CST on Day 1, either eye was chosen as the study eye. In this instance, the Investigator selected the eye that, in their opinion, was most likely to respond to treatment as the study eye. The maximum duration of the study for each randomized subject was up to 28 weeks (including up to 4 weeks for screening, 12 weeks treatment period, and 12 weeks follow-up).
The study was conducted on an out-patient basis.
The subjects had the following baseline demographics:
The study schedule of events was as follows:
The screening period was up to 4 weeks prior to study Day 1. All subjects signed an Informed Consent Form (ICF) prior to any study related procedures being performed. Subjects were 18 years of age or older, at the time of screening, and had a diagnosis of ciDME with prior anti-VEGF treatment.
A medical and ocular history was taken for each subject.
Each subject's DME disease history was recorded at the screening visit. The following was documented:
The Investigator's assessment of the subject's response to anti-VEGF treatment after the last 3 IVT injections compared to baseline was recorded using the following scales (baseline is defined as the status of edema and vision immediately prior to the first of the 3 injections):
Of the study population, the patient subjects had the following distribution of times since their first anti-VEGF treatment:
Previous and concomitant medication was also documented.
The following vital signs were assessed at rest (5 minutes in a supine position). The same equipment for each vital sign evaluation was used on given patient for all study visits. Vital signs were conducted prior to study drug administration and approximately 30 minutes post-study drug administration on applicable visits.
Physical examinations were performed. The physical examination were symptom directed and include the following body systems: general appearance, skin, lymphatic, head and neck, ears, nose and throat, chest and lungs, cardiovascular, abdomen, extremities, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular.
Laboratory assessments were also conducted.
Ophthalmic findings were performed. All ophthalmic assessments were conducted on both eyes except fundus photography which was taken in both eyes at the Screening visit and only in the study eye at subsequent visits.
On the day of first study drug administration (Day 1), the subject's eligibility was reconfirmed and baseline assessments were performed.
The subjects had the following baseline DME disease characteristics:
As demonstrated in Table 6 above, all subjects that took part in the study had anti-VEGF treatment prior to commencing the study. The minimum number of previous anti-VEGF injections for any patient was 3, and most patients had significantly more than 3 prior anti-VEGF injections.
The 129 eligible subjects were randomized approximately 1:1:1 into three arms:
Subjects visited the study clinic on Day 1 and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 during the Treatment Phase for study drug administration or sham procedure, safety, and ophthalmic assessments.
The ophthalmic assessments were carried out in approximately the following order at the subjects' visits to the study clinic on Day 1, and Weeks 4, 8 and 12:
The subject remained in the clinic after study drug administration or sham procedure until all post-dose procedures and observations were completed and the Investigator confirmed that the subject may be discharged. Investigators scheduled visits at Week 4, 8, and 12 to provide 28 days between visits. The visit window for these visits is −3 days to +7 days.
Approximately twenty-four (24) hours after each study drug administration or sham procedure on Day 1 and Weeks 4, 8, and 12, subjects were contacted by telephone to evaluate any reported AEs and changes in concomitant medications. In the event of any reported ocular or systemic AEs that were considered by the Investigator to be a possible cause for concern, the subjects returned to the clinic for assessment as soon as possible.
All subjects visited the clinic at Weeks 16, 20, and 24 after the last study drug administration or sham procedure for safety and ophthalmic assessments. The visit window for Weeks 16, 20, and 24 is ±7 days.
If any subject discontinued the trial early, every effort was made to complete the Week 24/early discontinuation (ED) evaluations as soon as possible and, whenever possible, prior to starting any new medication or treatment. All attempts were made to not discontinue the subject unless necessary.
Rescue intervention (e.g., anti-VEGF, focal/grid macular laser photocoagulation, IVT steroids) was administered due to worsening DME (i.e., attributable to worsening DME and not another cause) if either of the following occurred and, where possible, after consultation with the Medical Monitor:
If a study subject met the criteria for rescue intervention and received a rescue treatment in the study eye, the study subject will be discontinued from further participation in the study.
The assessment measured change from baseline in BCVA letter count in the study eye at Week 16. Change from baseline in BCVA letter count is calculated as Week 16 BCVA letter count minus Day 1 BCVA letter count such that a negative difference indicates a worsening in vision. In addition, treatment comparisons between each dose (Arms 1 and 2) of the injection of the compound of Formula A and the sham are calculated as the injection of the compound of Formula A minus sham.
For clinical trial use, the compound of Formula A was formulated as an injection, in accordance with the above outlined preparative methods. Any of the preparative methods outlined above in Background Examples 1 and 2 is suitable for preparing the injectable formulation of the compound of Formula A.
The injection of the compound of Formula A was supplied in two dose strengths, 60 μg/mL and 30 μg/mL free base equivalent of the compound of Formula A.
Injection of the compound of Formula A or sham procedure was administered to the study eye on Day 1 and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 during the Treatment Phase. At each scheduled visit, the date and time of study medication administration was recorded.
The injecting physician was not the Investigator as they remained masked throughout the study. In order to avoid breaking the mask, real and sham injections were performed by study personnel who were not masked and not otherwise involved in the study (note that post-injection IOP evaluations were performed by study personnel who were unmasked). For sham injections, the subjects were prepared exactly as for a real injection (i.e., including but not limited to: insertion of lid speculum, application of povidone-iodine and subconjunctival injection of an anesthetic) following which an empty syringe with no needle was pressed against the eye to mimic the pressure of an injection.
The formulation of the compound of Formula A was supplied in three dose strengths, sham, 30 μg/mL and 60 μg/mL free base equivalent solutions. The formulation of the compound of Formula A was presented in a 2 mL Type 1 clear glass serum vial sealed with a rubber stopper and white flip off seal. Each vial was packaged in a five (5) unit container carton. The packaged kits were refrigerated (2 to 8° C.). The formulation of the compound of Formula A was administered as an intravitreal injection in a final volume of 100 μL for the 3 μg (30 μg/mL) dose, and 100 μL for the 6 μg (60 μg/mL) dose.
On the day of the first injection visit, the kit carton was pulled from the refrigerator and inspected to ensure the tamper evident seal is intact. The kit carton was not used if the tamper evident seal had been compromised. The tamper evident seal was broken, the kit carton was opened, and the vial containing the compound of Formula A, 1 of 5, was removed. The vial was warmed to room temperature for a minimum of 15 minutes. The removable panel of the vial label was peeled and affixed to the subject documentation. The investigational product vial was used for patient dosing within the same working day after removal from refrigerated storage. For subsequent dosing vials were sequentially removed from the kit and use was recorded by affixing vial specific removable panel label to subject documentation.
The flip-off seal on the vial was removed and the top was wiped with an alcohol pad. Using the provided sterile, single-use 25-gauge needle attached to a sterile, single-use 1 CC tuberculin syringe, sufficient volume (to ensure a final injectable volume of 100 μL remains in the syringe following needle exchange and removal of trapped air as described) of the formulation of the compound of Formula A was withdrawn into the syringe by inserting the needle through the rubber stopper into the vial. Once the formulation of the compound of Formula A was drawn into the syringe, the 25-gauge needle that was used to draw the drug up was replaced with a sterile, single use 30-gauge needle to perform the injection. Trapped air/bubbles and excess volume were removed to medical waste so that 100 μL of the formulation of the compound of Formula A remained in the syringe. Sterility of the needle tips was maintained as well as vial surface during preparation to ensure that there was no contamination of the drug as it was withdrawn from the vial. Unnecessary and repeated removal was avoided, as well as replacement of the needle over cap, as it decreased needle sharpness.
The dose was administered immediately upon preparation:
Post-injection procedures—for all arms:
All packaging and labelling operations were performed according to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products and the relevant regulatory requirements.
The drug product was provided in a 2 mL Type 1 glass serum vial sealed with a rubber stopper and flip off seal. Each vial was for a single use and filled with 2 mL of the injection product of the compound of Formula A.
Supplies for control subjects took the form of boxes identical to those holding the vials of the compound of Formula A but these boxes contained empty vials. All boxes remained closed except while being accessed by the nominated unmasked personnel administering the real and sham injections.
The Investigator ensured that the drug product was stored in appropriate conditions in a secure, substantially constructed refrigerator with controlled access. Drug product was stored at 2 to 8° C. temperature except on dosing date where it could be at room temperature for up to 1 day. Upon completion of dosing, the used drug product could be destroyed with routine medical waste at the clinical site.
The concomitant use of the following medications was not be allowed in the study:
Details of all medications (other than those intended to treat the study subjects' DME), therapies and supplements administered within 3 months prior to Screening Visit until the end of the study was recorded
With the exception of ocular medications intended to treat DME, prior medications are defined as those medications taken within 3 months prior to Screening Visit; concomitant medications are defined as those medications ongoing at or started after Day 1.
The efficacy variable of interest in the study was: BCVA in letters as measured by ETDRS.
ETDRS is the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart
These further ophthalmic assessments (with which the skilled person would be familiar) were also used:
The eyelids, cornea, conjunctiva, anterior chamber, iris/pupil and lens were evaluated. Findings were graded as normal, abnormal non-clinically significant, or abnormal clinically significant. Slit lamp biomicroscopy was performed on both eyes and was conducted prior to study drug administration on applicable visits.
IOP was assessed in both eyes at all study visits. IOP was assessed with either applanation tonometry or tonopen; the method used was consistent throughout the study. IOP was assessed at both pre- and post-injection at visits with study drug administrations. Pre-injection IOP was performed prior to dilation. Post-injection IOP was assessed within 60 minutes after study drug or sham administration and was assessed by someone who was unmasked.
The vitreous, macula, choroid, optic nerve, and retina of both eyes were assessed. Findings were graded as normal, abnormal non-clinically significant, or abnormal clinically significant. The dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy was performed on both eyes and was conducted prior to study drug administration on applicable visits.
Safety variables of interest in this study are:
These results are also shown graphically in
These results are also shown graphically in
The majority of any reported adverse events (AEs) were mild. Two AEs led to discontinuation, one retinal neovascularization (6 μg arm) and one visual impairment (sham arm). All AEs except for the retinal neovascularization (6 μg arm) were considered unrelated to the treatment. Therefore, in >99% of the subjects, the treatment was safe and well-tolerated.
As demonstrated in Table 7, administration of the compound of Formula A to subjects that had previously had anti-VEGF treatment resulted in a slowing of the progression of their DME or impaired visual acuity. 22 patients in the group that were administered doses of 3 μg of the compound of Formula A showed any loss in BCVA (letters) from baseline compared to 24 patients that had the sham procedure. Even more markedly, only 13 patients in the group that were administered doses of 6 μg of the compound of Formula A showed any loss in BCVA (letters) from baseline compared to 24 patients that had the sham procedure. Further, 5 patients that had the sham procedure lost ≥15 letters from baseline, whereas only 2 patients in the 3 μg of the compound of Formula A group, and 0 patients in the 6 μg of the compound of Formula A group lost ≥15 letters from baseline.
The results in Table 8 demonstrate that, for the patients that were administered doses of 6 μg of the compound of Formula A that the improvement in BCVA (letters) score, compared to the sham treatment, was maintained following the 16 week treatment period, through to the 24 week time period. It appears that this effect would be seen for doses greater than those for the group of patients that were administered the 3 μg doses of the compound of Formula A. These data point towards the efficacy of a higher dose treatment, i.e. the 6 μg of the compound of Formula A, as well as higher doses.
The results in Table 9 demonstrate that the population of patients that had a baseline BCVA score of greater than 55 letters (i.e. ≥56 letters), who may be referred to as the patients in the early stages of their DME or poor visual acuity, on average, and at every measurement taken (both during the treatment procedure and in the follow up phase) had a consistently better average improvement in BCVA score than the overall average population score. Therefore, the treatment represents an efficacious treatment particularly for those patients that were in the early stages of DME or poor visual acuity.
It will be understood that the invention has been described by way of example only and modifications may be made whilst remaining within the scope and spirit of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1918994.3 | Dec 2019 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2020/053153 | 12/9/2020 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62945560 | Dec 2019 | US |