The present invention relates generally to a system and method for trialing components of a modular hip prosthesis, and particularly to a system and method capable of gauging the degree of anteversion of the femur.
During the lifetime of a patient, it may be necessary to perform a joint replacement procedure on the patient as a result of, for example, disease or trauma. The joint replacement procedure, or joint arthroplasty, may involve the use of a prosthesis which is implanted into one of the patient's bones. In the case of a hip replacement procedure, a femoral prosthesis is implanted into the patient's thigh bone or femur. One type of early femoral prosthesis was typically constructed as a one-piece structure having an upper portion which includes a spherically-shaped head which bears against the patient's pelvis or acetabulum, along with an elongated intramedullary stem which is utilized to secure the femoral component to the patient's femur. In order to secure the prosthesis to the patient's femur, the medullary canal of the patient's femur is first surgically prepared (e.g. reamed and/or broached) such that the intramedullary stem of the femoral prosthesis may be subsequently implanted therein. The femoral prosthesis may be press fit into the medullary canal or, in the alternative, bone cement may be utilized to secure the femoral prosthesis within the medullary canal.
During performance of a joint replacement procedure, it is generally important to provide the orthopaedic surgeon with a certain degree of flexibility in the selection of a prosthesis. In particular, the anatomy of the bone into which the prosthesis is to be implanted may vary somewhat from patient to patient. For example, in the case of a femoral prosthesis, the patient's femur may be relatively long or relatively short thereby requiring use of a femoral prosthesis which includes a stem that is relatively long or short, respectively. Moreover, in certain cases, such as when use of a relatively long stem length is required, the stem must also be bowed in order to conform to the anatomy of the patient's femur.
Such a need for prostheses of varying shapes and sizes can create a number of problems in regard to use of a one-piece prosthesis. For example, a hospital or surgery center must maintain a relatively large inventory of prostheses in order to have the requisite mix of prostheses needed for certain situations such as trauma situations and revision surgery. Moreover, since the bow of the stem must conform to the bow of the intramedullary canal of the patient's femur, rotational positioning of the upper portion (i.e. proximal end) of the prosthesis is limited thereby rendering precise locating of the upper portion and hence the head of the prosthesis very difficult. In addition, since corresponding bones of the left and right side of a patient's anatomy (e.g. left and right femur) may bow in opposite directions, it is necessary to produce “left” and “right” variations of the prosthesis in order to provide anteversion of the bowed stem thereby further increasing the inventory of prostheses which must be maintained.
As a result of these and other drawbacks, a number of modular prostheses have been designed. As its name implies, a modular prosthesis is constructed in modular form so that the individual elements or features of the prosthesis can be selected to fit the needs of a given patient's anatomy. For example, modular prostheses have been designed which include a proximal neck component which can be assembled to any one of numerous distal stem components in order to create an assembly which fits the needs of a given patient's anatomy. Such a design allows the distal stem component to be selected and thereafter implanted in the patient's bone in a position which conforms to the patient's anatomy while also allowing for a limited degree of independent positioning of the proximal neck component relative to the patient's pelvis.
In another type of modular implant, three components (in addition to the head) are utilized: a distal stem component that is engaged within the femur, a proximal metaphyseal filling component, and an intermediate neck component that supports the head component on the distal stem component. The provision of three components has greatly increased the degree of flexibility in producing a total hip implant that most closely approximates the patient's skeletal anatomy and normal joint movement. One such system is the S-ROM® total hip system marketed by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. The S-ROM® total hip system offers neck and head components having different lengths, different lateral offsets of the neck relative to the stem, as well as different stem configurations.
In order to properly size the final implant, many systems utilize trial implants, commonly referred to as simply trials. Thus, in modular systems such as the S-ROM® instrument system, neck trials, proximal body trials, distal stem trials, head trials and sleeve trials can be provided. Each trial is provided in a number of sizes and geometries to give the surgeon a wide range of combination from which to choose. The trials afford the orthopaedic surgeon the opportunity to assess the fit and position of a final implant without having to complete the fixation. Like the implant systems itself, the trials are modular to reduce the inventory of components and the complexity of the trialing process.
Success of the hip replacement procedure depends in large part on the technical precision with which the final implant is inserted and the modular components oriented relative to each other. Current trialing systems have performed well in assessing implant size and gross orientation, relying primarily on laser marking, for example. However, there remains an unfulfilled need for a trialing system (as well as a modular implant system) that is able to accurately reproduce the anteversion angle of the femur. The anteversion angle is an angle of rotation between the ball end of the femur and the plane of the intramedullary canal of the bone. In the context of the modular implant, the anteversion angle is the relative angular rotation of the proximal neck component relative to the distal stem component. Proper rotational position, or anteversion angle, allows for accurate and stable reproduction of the mechanical orientation and function of the reconstructed hip joint.
For implants having a straight distal stem, the proper anteversion angle can be obtained by simply spinning the distal stem within the prepared bore in the femur. In a typical case, the surgeon can visually evaluate the orientation of the proximal body relative to the surrounding anatomy. If a trial is used the trial is removed and the final prosthesis is implanted as close to the trial position as possible. Sometimes, x-rays are used to verify the rotational alignment, while some systems rely upon external references to verify alignment.
The S-ROM® total hip system described above utilizes laser markings on the proximal end of the distal stem and on the proximal sleeve. These markings enable the surgeon to measure relative anteversion rotational alignment between the components. Since the sleeve has infinite anteversion it is not necessarily oriented relative to a bony landmark that can be used to define the anteversion angle. In fact, for simplicity, most current sleeves are oriented with the laser marking pointing directly laterally into the remaining available bone of the femur.
The problem of ensuring proper anteversion alignment is exacerbated where the modular system includes a curved distal stem. As explained above, where a long distal stem is utilized, it must be curved to follow the natural shape of the femur. Obviously, a curved stem means that the rotational alignment cannot be modified by simply rotating the stem within the prepared bore, since the bore itself is also curved. Monolithic, or one-piece stems must be offered with a predetermined anteversion angle, typically fifteen degrees. At present no modular implant or modular trial system is available that allows for accurate reproduction of the anteversion rotational orientation.
The present invention contemplates a method for trialing a modular hip joint replacement system to determine the anteversion rotational angle of the femoral component. In one embodiment, the method includes the steps of disposing a distal stem component within a prepared bore in the femur, in which the distal stem component is configured for substantially permanent fixation within the prepared bore. The distal stem component has a proximal portion defining a stem locator feature. Next, a proximal trial assembly is mounted on the proximal portion of the distal stem component. The trial assembly defines a bore therethrough for accessing the locator recess in the distal stem component. The proximal trial assembly includes a first component rotatable relative to the distal stem component about a longitudinal axis of the proximal portion of the distal stem component. This first component also defines a locator feature independent of the stem locator feature. Moreover, the first component includes a portion configured as a trial neck so that the first component can be manipulated relative to the distal stem component to determine an anteversion rotational angle for the femoral component of the hip joint.
The first component of the proximal trial assembly is rotated relative to the distal stem component, while the stem component maintains its rotational position within the femur. The surgeon manipulates the first component until the trial neck portion is oriented at an acceptable anteversion rotational angle relative to the femur. At this point, an alignment instrument can be used to reference the anteversion orientation of the trial neck portion relative to the femur. In particular, the instrument references the locator features in the relatively fixed distal stem portion and the rotated component of the proximal trial assembly.
The inventive method can contemplate using the instrument referenced to the anteversion orientation to form the final femoral implant. In particular, the instrument can be fixed at its position when it referenced the locator features. The instrument then serves as a gauge or template for positioning a proximal neck component of the joint replacement system at the appropriate anteversion orientation relative to the distal stem component.
In some embodiments, the distal stem component of the hip replacement system is fixed within the bone bore in a conventional manner. With these embodiments, the proximal trial body assembly is used to evaluate the anteversion rotational angle and then removed. The alignment instrument can be engaged to a proximal component of the replacement system and used to place the proximal component on the distal stem component. Since the alignment instrument operates as a gauge, the proximal component can only be mounted on the distal stem component at the measured anteversion rotational angle. Once the proximal component is properly positioned on the proximal end of the distal stem component, the instrument is disengaged from the proximal component and the final fixation of the implant system is accomplished.
In another embodiment, the distal stem component is not fixed within the bore. With this embodiment, once the anteversion rotational angle has been determined, the distal stem component can be removed from the femur and separately assembled with the remaining components of the hip replacement system.
The present invention is particularly useful where the distal stem component is long and curved to match the curvature of the femur. However, the same principles can be used with a straight stem component.
The methods of the invention can be employed where the hip replacement system includes a sleeve component. The method can thus be modified to include the step of disposing the sleeve component within the prepared bore such that the proximal end of the distal stem component extends through the sleeve. The features of the inventive system and method allow the trialing procedure to occur even with the sleeve component disposed within the femur. As with the distal stem component, the sleeve component can be substantially permanently fixed within the bone bore or can be removably disposed in the femur. In the preferred embodiment, the proximal body assembly can be rotationally indexed to the sleeve component within the bone bore.
The invention further contemplates a distal stem component for a modular hip joint replacement system that can be readily used in a trialing procedure. The distal stem component can include a curved bone engaging portion configured for fixation within a prepared bore in the femur. A proximal portion of the component defines an engagement portion configured for engaging a proximal modular component of the hip joint replacement system. Moreover, the proximal portion defines a locator feature that is disposed at a predetermined angular orientation relative to the plane of curvature of the bone engaging portion (or the femur itself). The locator feature is arranged on the proximal portion to be accessible from outside the femur and is usable to provide a remote indication of the spatial orientation of the bone engaging portion even when it is within the prepared bore of the femur.
In a preferred embodiment, the locator feature is elongated along an axis extending along the predetermined angular orientation. In a more specific embodiment, the locator feature is a substantially oval recess defined in the exposed end of the proximal portion of the distal stem component. Other recess configurations are contemplated provided they are not configured as a uniform body of rotation, such as a circle, hexagon, octagon, and the like. In other words, the locator feature must be capable of indexed engagement by the alignment instrument to provide a substantially infallible remote indication of the rotational orientation of the distal stem component relative to the bone. Preferably, the oval recess is arranged with its long axis substantially perpendicular to the plane of curvature of the bone engaging portion.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the engagement portion of the distal stem component includes threads. The threads can be used to engage a nut used to fix the proximal trial body assembly to the proximal end of the distal stem component when the proper anteversion rotational angle has been ascertained. In addition, the threads can be used as part of the final fixation of the modular hip replacement system.
The distal stem component can also include opposite flats defined at the proximal portion of the component. These opposite flats can engage complementary internal flats of a second component of the proximal trial body assembly to essentially rotationally lock the component to the distal stem component. Thus, this second component does not rotate relative to the distal stem portion once the proximal trial body assembly has been mounted on the stem component. The trial body assembly can include a third component that is configured to engage the sleeve component of the final implant assembly. This third component is mounted for rotation about the second component to facilitate integration of the proximal trial body assembly with the distal stem and sleeve components.
The distal stem component can form part of a trialing system for determining the anteversion rotational angle of the femoral component of a modular hip replacement system. The trialing system includes a proximal trial body assembly that includes a first component defining a first bore for receiving at least a portion of the proximal portion of the distal stem component for accessing the stem locator feature. The first component is rotatable relative to the distal stem component about a longitudinal axis of the proximal portion of the distal stem component. The first component can also define a trial locator feature independent of the stem locator feature that is also accessible from outside the prepared bore in the femur. As indicated above, the first component can also include a portion configured as a trial neck component for the modular hip replacement system.
The proximal trial body assembly also includes a second component defining a second bore configured for mounting the second component on the distal stem component with the proximal portion of the distal stem component extending through the bore. An interdigitating engagement is defined between the first and second components for fixing the first component to the second component after the first component has been rotated relative to the distal stem component. The interdigitating engagement can preferably be in the form of complementary radially splined surfaces. The interdigitating engagement can permit relative rotation between the two components while the anteversion angle is being determined. The splines can generate an audible “click” at angular increments as the first component is rotated.
Once the proper anteversion angle has been reached, the interdigitating engagement fixes the two components together. Since the proximal body assembly is rotationally locked together, the stem locator feature and the trial locator feature can be externally referenced to determine a relative angular orientation of the first component relative to the distal stem component indicative of the anteversion rotational angle of the femoral component.
One significant benefit of the present invention is that the true anteversion rotational angle of the femur can be determined and accurately approximated in a final hip replacement implant. Another benefit is that certain implant components of the final implant can be used to perform the trialing procedure so no errors arise due to non-conformity of the trial component relative to the implant component.
Another benefit presented by the invention is that the anteversion angle can be determined without requiring external referencing, such as by x-ray. In addition, the invention eliminates the necessity for performing angular measurements and then duplicating these measurements during the construction of the final implant.
These and other benefits can be discerned from the following written description taken together with the accompanying figures.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, a specific embodiment thereof has been shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intent to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Referring now to
The modular femoral prosthesis 10, shown in
In such a manner, the prosthesis 10 may be utilized to rotatably secure the patient's femur F to the patient's pelvis (not shown). In particular, the head component 16 is positioned to bear on either the patient's natural acetabulum or a prosthetic socket which has been implanted into the patient's pelvis to replace his or her acetabulum. In such a manner, the modular prosthesis 10 and the natural or artificial acetabulum collectively function as a system which replaces the natural “ball and socket” joint of the patient's hip.
As shown in
Moreover, it should also be appreciated that, although not shown in
As shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the sleeve component 14 includes a bore 26 defined therethrough. The bore is sized to receive the post 24 when the modular prosthesis 10 is assembled. The post 24 also includes a bore (not shown) that is sized to receive a post 28 of the distal stem component 18. The distal stem component includes a distal portion 29, which is curved in the illustrated embodiment, but could be straight depending upon the anatomy of the femur F into which the stem 18 is implanted.
Details of one aspect of the present invention can be seen in
In accordance with the present invention, the tapered shank 32 defines an annular shoulder 36 adjacent the threaded portion 34. In addition, the threaded portion 34 includes a pair of opposite flats 38. Further, the proximal threaded portion 34 defines a locator feature, such as a locator recess 35 (see
Another aspect of the trialing system is depicted in
The trialing components are shown in
Referring to
As with the distal stem portion 18, the proximal stud 56 includes a substantially cylindrical body 73. The body generally corresponds in length to the tapered shank 32 of the distal stem component 18. However, since the trial stem 52 is not permanently implanted, the body 73 need not exhibit the taper-lock configuration of the distal stem component. The proximal stud 56 further includes a threaded portion 76 projecting from the end of the body 73. Like the distal stem component, the body 73 defines an annular shoulder 74 adjacent the threaded portion 76. Further, the threaded portion 76 includes opposite flats 77, similar to the flats 38 of the distal stem component.
The present invention contemplates that the proximal end of the threaded portions, portion 34 of the distal stem component 18 and portion 76 of the proximal stud 56, define a rotational alignment indexing or locator feature, such as recess 35 for the implant stem and recess 80 for the trial stem. In the preferred embodiment, the locator recess is elongated to establish an angular orientation between elements of the trialing assembly 50. Most preferably, the recess 80 (as well as recess 35) is oval, as depicted in
Returning to
The trialing assembly 50 includes a proximal body assembly 60, which is itself formed of several elements. Details of the proximal body assembly 60 can be discerned from
The taper component 90 is elongated and hollow, having a bore 91 extending therethrough. The proximal end of the bore defines internal threads 92 that engage external threads 96 on the keyed component 94. The bore 91 of the taper component 90 is sized for a loose fit over the proximal stud 56 of the trial stem 52 (or the tapered shank 28 of the stem component 18). The outer surface of the component 90 is tapered to match a portion of the internal taper of the sleeve 14 or of the prepared bore B in absence of a sleeve. The outer diameter of the taper component 90 is further sized to fit through the bore 26 in the sleeve component 14 when the component is mounted within the femoral bore B.
The proximal ring 100 is placed concentrically about the keyed component 94 prior to threading the keyed component 94 external threads 96 into the internal threads 92 of the taper component. The proximal ring 100 is then trapped between the taper component 90 and a flange 97 defined at the proximal end of the taper component, as best shown in
However, since the keyed component 94 slides within the central bore 102 of the proximal ring, the keyed component (as well as the tapered component 90 in threaded engagement) is free to rotate within the proximal ring. This rotational degree of freedom is important because the keyed component 94 defines internal flats 98 at the flange end of the bore 95, as shown in
When the trialing assembly 50 is engaged within the femur, the trial stem 52 can be situated within the bore B in the femur F. The sleeve component 14 can be disposed within the proximal portion of the bore either before or after the trial stem is positioned. The proximal body assembly 60 can then be placed in position by sliding the trial body taper component 90 through the bore 26 of the sleeve component and around the proximal stud 56 of the trial stem 52 (or around the stem post 28 of the implant component 18), as depicted in
These foregoing components provide the foundation for the anteversion rotational alignment capabilities of the present invention. Specifically, the proximal body assembly 60 of the trial assembly 50 includes a keyed interdigitating component 106 that fits over the keyed component 94 in a manner best illustrated in the enlarged view of
The interdigitating component 106 includes a proximally facing toothed surface 107. This surface 107 is configured for interdigitating engagement with a similarly configured surface 124 on the distal face of the trial neck component 62, as shown in
When the proximal body assembly is installed within the sleeve 14 mounted within the bone bore B (as shown in
Once the trial neck component 62 has been properly positioned, the entire trial assembly 50 can be clamped together by way of a nut 64 (FIGS. 4,15). As shown in the detail view of
When the anteversion angle has been approximated by the trial assembly 50, an alignment or measurement instrument 130 can be used to evaluate the angular relationship between the trial neck component 62 and the stem component 56 or 18. From one perspective, the trial assembly provides the surgeon with an indication of the orientation of a curved stem, such as implant stem portion 29 or trial stem portion 54, when the stem is mounted within the femur. There is no need to use x-rays to determine the global position of the distal stem component. Significantly, the trial assembly 50 provides a direct indication of the actual anteversion angle of the patient's femur. This direct indication can be simply the clamped rotational position of the assembly components, or can be accurately measured using indicator marks. In the latter case, indicator marks can be provided on the proximal surface of the sleeve component 14 or on a surface of the alignment instrument 130 to visually indicate the rotational orientation of the trial neck component relative to the sleeve component.
In one embodiment of the invention, the alignment instrument 130 is used to provide a template for the formation of the final implant, as shown in
The surgeon can use the instrument 130 to properly locate the implant neck component 12 (
In another embodiment, the alignment instrument 130 can be pre-set to a pre-determined angular position. This angular position can be determined from x-rays of the affected joint to ascertain the actual anteversion angle of the femur. This anteversion angle can then be dialed into the alignment instrument to pre-set the relative orientation between the alignment shaft 134 and the arms 132. The instrument can then be used as explained above to properly position the final implant components, either in situ or at an adjacent preparation table.
In one beneficial aspect of the invention, the implant distal stem component 18 can be used in the trial process. As explained above, the proximal end of the stem component (i.e., the end of the threaded portion 34) includes the locator recess 35 depicted in
The sleeve component 14 and stem component 18 are part of the final implant 10 shown in
Although the proximal end of the distal stem, namely the tapered shank 32, is tapered, the bore 91 of the trial tapered component 90 has a diameter sized to prevent a taper fit between the two components. Thus, the tapered component 90, and consequently the entire proximal body assembly 60, can freely rotate relative to the tapered shank 32 to perform the anteversion rotational alignment functions. The nut 64 is configured to engage the threaded portion 34 of the stem component 18, so the proximal body assembly 60 and trial neck component 62 can be fixed to the sleeve 14 and distal stem component 18. The alignment tool 130 can be used in the manner described above to provide a template for the anteversion rotational angle. The tool 130 can then be used to grab implant neck component 12 and manipulate the component for implantation within the femur. In particular, the tool 130 can carry the neck component 12 to push the post 24 through the bore 26 of the sleeve 14 and about the tapered shank 28. (Note that since the post 24 does not include the wings 101 found on the proximal ring 100, the notches 30 on the sleeve component 14 are no longer needed). As the alignment tool 130 is advanced further, the distal end of the alignment shaft 134 can engage the locator recess 35 in the distal end of the stem component 18. Of course, some rotational manipulation of the tool 130 will likely be needed before the alignment shaft falls into the recess.
When the alignment shaft distal end 136 is properly located in the recess 35, the neck component 12 carried by the tool 130 is situated at the proper anteversion rotational angle. The tool 130 can be readily removed by disengaging the arms 132 from the neck component 12 and sliding the tool upward out of the neck component. The final fixation of the implant components can be accomplished in a known manner, for instance using a tool to pull the tapered components together in a tight taper lock. In a specific embodiment, an implant nut can engage the threaded portion 34 of the distal stem component 18 to act as a secondary locking feature for the implant assembly.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the components of the modular prosthesis 10 can be configured as disclosed in commonly-owned, co-pending patent applications Ser. No. 10/033,105, filed on Oct. 22, 2001, and entitled “Modular Prosthesis Having a Stem Component with a Counterbored Cavity Defined Therein and Associated Method” (the '105 Application), and Ser. No. 10/032,984, filed on Oct. 23, 2001 and entitled “Self-Locking Modular Prosthesis Having Taper Feature and Associated Method”. The disclosures of both co-pending applications are incorporated herein by reference, and particularly
The modular implant of the present invention forms part of a trial assembly 50 as described above. Certain details of the trial assembly, including the trial stem 52, the proximal body assembly 60 and the trial neck component 62, is the subject of commonly-owned, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/327,527, filed on Dec. 20, 2002, which description is incorporated herein by reference. Likewise, details of the alignment instrument 130 described above is the subject of commonly-owned, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/327,196, filed on Dec. 20, 2002 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,022,141), which description is also incorporated herein by reference. Certain aspects of the subject matter of these two commonly-owned co-pending applications has been described to assist in understanding the present invention. It should be understood that certain details of the aforementioned components have been left to these co-pending applications.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same should be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character. It is understood that only the preferred embodiments have been presented and that all changes, modifications and further applications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected. For example, the preferred embodiment of the invention contemplates the provision of a locator recess 35 in the implant distal stem component 18 and the recess 80 in the trial stem 52. However, the recess can instead constitute a locator feature that is externally accessible by an instrument, such as the alignment instrument 130, to determine the rotational position of the distal stem component within the prepared bore B of the femur F. For instance, the recess can be replaced with an elongated upwardly projecting boss, with appropriate modification to the alignment shaft 134 of the instrument 130. Moreover, the locating feature can be in the form of a key-shaped slot in the proximal portion of the implant or trial stems, where the slot is either fully contained within the end surface of extends through the side surface of the proximal portion.
In another modification, the trial proximal body component can be modified where no implant sleeve component is used in the final replacement hip system. In other words, with some hip systems, the sleeve component 14 and the neck component 12 is modified accordingly. In this case, the trial proximal body assembly does not require the proximal ring 100 or the wings 101. In this instance, the trial proximal body assembly can be configured as shown in
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/327,488, filed on Dec. 20, 2002 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,235,106). The disclosure of the above-identified published patent application is hereby totally incorporated by reference in its entirety. Cross reference is made to the following applications: U.S. application Ser. No. 10/327,187, filed on Dec. 20, 2002 which is entitled “ADJUSTABLE BIOMECHANICAL TEMPLATING & RESECTION INSTRUMENT AND ASSOCIATED METHOD”, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/327,196, filed on Dec. 20, 2002 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,022,141) which is entitled “ALIGNMENT DEVICE FOR MODULAR IMPLANTS AND METHOD”, and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/327,527, filed on Dec. 20, 2002 which is entitled “INSTRUMENT AND ASSOCIATED METHOD OF TRIALING FOR MODULAR HIP STEMS”. The disclosures of each of the above-identified patent applications and patent(s) are hereby totally incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2492249 | Willard et al. | Dec 1949 | A |
3067740 | Harboush | Sep 1959 | A |
3271868 | Kuntscher et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3801989 | McKee | Apr 1974 | A |
3810312 | Carson | May 1974 | A |
4051559 | Pifferi | Oct 1977 | A |
4131998 | Spears | Jan 1979 | A |
4335715 | Kirkley | Jun 1982 | A |
4517969 | Halcomb, III et al. | May 1985 | A |
4608055 | Morrey et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4658808 | Link | Apr 1987 | A |
4676797 | Anapliotis et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4716894 | Lazzeri et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4917530 | Engelhardt et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4938762 | Wehrli | Jul 1990 | A |
4959066 | Dunn et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4969911 | Greene et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5002578 | Luman | Mar 1991 | A |
5002581 | Paxson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5064427 | Burkinshaw | Nov 1991 | A |
5100407 | Conrad et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5133760 | Petersen et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5135529 | Paxson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5197989 | Hinckfuss et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201882 | Paxson | Apr 1993 | A |
5314492 | Hamilton et al. | May 1994 | A |
5364401 | Ferrante et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370706 | Bolesky et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5476466 | Barrette et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5507824 | Lennox | Apr 1996 | A |
5507830 | DeMane et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514136 | Richelsoph | May 1996 | A |
5601567 | Swajger et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607431 | Dudasik et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5645607 | Hickey | Jul 1997 | A |
5653765 | McTighe et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658349 | Brooks et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5674225 | Müller | Oct 1997 | A |
5700268 | Bertin | Dec 1997 | A |
5725592 | White et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728128 | Crickenberget et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5766261 | Neal et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776200 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792143 | Samuelson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810829 | Elliott et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810830 | Noble et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824068 | Bugge | Oct 1998 | A |
5849015 | Haywood et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858020 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860969 | White et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876459 | Powell | Mar 1999 | A |
5879391 | Slamin | Mar 1999 | A |
5885299 | Winslow et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888245 | Meulink et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5902339 | Keller | May 1999 | A |
5906644 | Powell | May 1999 | A |
5919195 | Wilson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935172 | Ochoa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951564 | Schroder et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951606 | Burke | Sep 1999 | A |
5976147 | LaSalle et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976188 | Dextradeur et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989259 | Penenberg et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993455 | Noble | Nov 1999 | A |
6027507 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045556 | Cohen | Apr 2000 | A |
6071311 | O'Neil et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080162 | Dye et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097978 | Demarais et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102950 | Vaccaro | Aug 2000 | A |
6102956 | Kranz | Aug 2000 | A |
6110179 | Flivik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113605 | Storer | Sep 2000 | A |
6117138 | Burrows et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126694 | Gray, Jr. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136035 | Lob et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6165177 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179877 | Burke | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193724 | Chan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193759 | Rio et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197065 | Martin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206844 | Reichel et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206884 | Masini | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224605 | Anderson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238435 | Meulink et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6258095 | Lombardo et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258097 | Cook et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277123 | Maroney et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6319286 | Fernandez et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330845 | Meulink | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332886 | Green et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355068 | Doubler et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361563 | Terrill-Grisoni et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6432110 | Richelsoph | Aug 2002 | B1 |
7235106 | Daniels et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
20010001121 | Lombardo et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010007957 | Martin et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010053935 | Hartdegen et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20070244566 | Daniels et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003266447 | Jul 2004 | AU |
0 381 893 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 677 281 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0 824 013 | Feb 1998 | EP |
1 004 283 | May 2000 | EP |
1 022 001 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1099427 | May 2001 | EP |
1 234 558 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1437103 | Jul 2004 | EP |
2 416 002 | Aug 1979 | FR |
2 492 249 | Apr 1982 | FR |
2 684 287 | Jun 1993 | FR |
2 705 558 | Dec 1994 | FR |
2735971 | Jan 1997 | FR |
2735971 | Jan 1997 | FR |
2004202234 | Jul 2004 | JP |
WO 9615739 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 02 17826 | Mar 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070244566 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10327488 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 11810608 | US |