Triboelectric system

Abstract
Methods and systems for inducing an electric charge in a cleaning sheet for cleaning and removing particles from a surface are disclosed. The systems include a cleaning sheet for collecting and retaining the particles and a charging surface configured to frictionally engage the sheet. The cleaning sheets typically have a basis weight of at least about 30 g/m2. The system may include a container for housing and dispensing the cleaning sheet. When the sheet is passed across the charging surface, the electrical charge in the sheet is generally increased by at least about 500 V. Methods of and kits for cleaning surfaces and collecting and retaining debris are also disclosed.
Description




BACKGROUND




Dust cloths for removing dust from a surface to be cleaned (e.g., a table) are generally known. Such known dust cloths are typically made of woven or non-woven fabrics and are often sprayed or coated with a wet, oily substance for retaining the dust. However, such dust cloths can leave an oily film on the surface being cleaned.




Other known dust cloths include non-woven entangled fibers having spaces between the entangled fibers for retaining the dust. The entangled fibers are typically supported by a network grid or scrim structure, which can provide additional strength to such cloths. However, such cloths can become saturated with the dust during use (i.e., dust buildup) and/or may not be completely effective at picking up dense particles, large particles or other debris.




Facial tissues for removing bodily fluids (e.g., mucus) and debris (e.g., makeup) from a user are also generally known. Such facial tissues may include a moisturizer, oil or antibacterial agent to soothe the skin of the user. Such facial tissues typically are made of loose weave pulp fibers (e.g., entangled by an “air laid” process), and have a relatively low basis weight. Such facial tissues are typically drawn from a storage container, such as a flexible package or a rigid “tissue box.” However, a problem with such facial tissues is that they are easily torn or broken, and do not effectively retain or attract common household debris particles such as dirt. Further, such facial tissues typically will not hold an electric charge for a period longer than a few seconds, due in part to their composition (typically paper pulp).




Accordingly, it would be advantageous to provide a cleaning sheet that can pick up and retain dust and debris. It would also be advantageous to provide a cleaning sheet that has an enhanced dust collection capacity. It would also be advantageous to provide a cleaning sheet that attracts debris without the use of a significant amount of an oily additive. It would also be advantageous to provide a cleaning sheet that retains relatively large and/or denser particles of debris. It would also be advantageous to provide a cleaning sheet that is relatively strong. It would further be advantageous to provide a cleaning sheet having any one or more of these or other advantageous features.




SUMMARY




The present application relates generally to cleaning sheets, such as for use in cleaning surfaces (e.g., in the home or work environment). In particular, the application relates to a cleaning sheet for collecting and retaining dust, larger particles and/or other debris. More particularly, the present application relates to a cleaning sheet capable of having an electric charge induced by triboelectric effects. The cleaning sheet may be useful for cleaning and removing particles and other debris from a surface such as a table, floor, article of furniture or the like. Some embodiments of the cleaning sheet may include multiple layers to increase debris retention and/or strength. The sheet typically has a basis weight of at least about 30 g/m


2


.




In one embodiment, a system for cleaning and removing particles from a surface is provided. The system includes a cleaning sheet for collecting and retaining the particles, and may have a basis weight greater than about 30 g/m


2


. The system also typically includes a container for housing and dispensing the cleaning sheet. The container includes a charging surface configured to frictionally engage the cleaning sheet. When the cleaning sheet is passed across the charging surface, the electrostatic charge in the cleaning sheet may be increased by at least about 500 V and more desirably by at least about 1000 V.




The container may include an interior receptacle configured for housing a plurality of cleaning sheets. The container also generally includes an outlet for dispensing at least one of the cleaning sheets. The outlet includes at least one and more commonly two charging surfaces. The first charging surface and the second charging surface may each be configured to frictionally engage a cleaning sheet as it is dispensed through the outlet, thereby inducing an electrical charge in the cleaning sheet.




According to another embodiment, a method of cleaning a surface is provided. The method includes dispensing the cleaning sheet from a generally nonconductive container. The container may include at least one charging surface. The frictional engagement of the cleaning sheet against the first charging surface may increase an electrostatic charge of the cleaning sheet by at least about 500 V. The method also includes contacting the surface with the cleaning sheet.




According to another embodiment, a kit for cleaning surfaces and collecting and retaining debris is provided. The kit includes a cleaning head and a cleaning sheet adapted for coupling to the head. The kit also includes a container for housing and dispensing the cleaning sheet. The container has at least one charging surface configured to frictionally engage the cleaning sheet as it is dispensed from the container. This type of container allows a charge of at least about 1000 V to be frictionally induced in the cleaning sheet. The cleaning sheet is then contacted with the surface to be cleaned before the electrostatic charge has been substantially dissipated.




The cleaning sheet typically has a relatively low overall breaking strength in order to preserve a relative amount of flexibility. The term “breaking strength” as used in this disclosure means the value of a load (i.e., the first peak value during the measurement of the tensile strength) at which the cleaning sheet begins to break when a tensile load is applied to the cleaning sheet. The breaking strength of the sheet should be high enough to prevent “shedding” of fibers or tearing of the cleaning sheet during use. The breaking strength of the cleaning sheet is typically at least about 500 g/30 cm, and cleaning sheets with breaking strengths of 1,500 g/30 cm to 4,000 g/30 cm are quite suitable for use with the cleaning implements.




When intended to be used with a cleaning utensil, mounting structure, or the like, the cleaning sheet typically has a relatively low overall elongation to assist in resisting “bunching” or “puckering” of the cleaning sheet. The term “elongation” as used in this disclosure means the elongation percentage (%) of the cleaning sheet when a tensile load of 500 g/30 mm is applied. For example, when designed to be used in conjunction with a mop or similar cleaning implement where the cleaning sheet is fixedly mounted, the present cleaning sheets typically may have an elongation of no more than about 25% and, preferably, no more than about 15%.




The terms “surface” and “surface to be cleaned” as used in this disclosure are broad terms and are not intended as terms of limitation. The term surface as used in this disclosure includes substantially hard or rigid surfaces (e.g., plastic, wood, articles of furniture, tables, shelving, floors, ceilings, hard furnishings, household appliances, glass, and the like), as well as relatively softer or semi-rigid surfaces (e.g., rugs, carpets, fabrics soft furnishings, linens, clothing, flesh and the like).




The term “debris” as used in this disclosure is a broad term and is not intended as a term of limitation. In addition to dust and other fine particulate matter, the term debris includes relatively large-sized particulate material (e.g., having an average diameter greater than about 1 mm) such as large-sized dirt, food particles, crumbs, soil, sand, lint, and waste pieces of fibers and hair, which may not be collected with conventional dust rags, as well as dust and other fine particulate matter.




Throughout this disclosure, the text refers to various embodiments of the cleaning sheet and/or methods of using the sheet. The various embodiments discussed are merely illustrative and are not meant to limit the scope of the present invention. The various embodiments described are intended to provide a variety of illustrative examples and should not necessarily be construed as descriptions of alternative species since the descriptions of the various embodiments may be of overlapping scope.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES





FIG. 1

is a sectional view of a cleaning sheet according to an exemplary embodiment.





FIG. 2

is a schematic diagram of atoms being brought into physical contact.





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of the atoms of

FIG. 2

separated from physical contact





FIG. 4

is a schematic diagram of atoms having opposite charges being attracted.





FIG. 5

is a schematic diagram of atoms having similar charges being repelled.





FIG. 6

is a perspective view of a dispensing mechanism according to an exemplary embodiment.





FIG. 7

is a fragmentary cross-sectional view of the dispensing mechanism of

FIG. 6

along line


7





7


of FIG.


6


.





FIG. 8

is a fragmentary sectional view of a dispensing mechanism according to a preferred embodiment.





FIG. 9

is a fragmentary sectional view of a dispensing mechanism according to an alternative embodiment.





FIG. 10

is a fragmentary sectional view of an actuator according to a suitable embodiment.





FIG. 11

is a top plan view of an outlet of a dispensing mechanism according to an alternative embodiment.





FIG. 12

is a top plan view of a web according to a suitable embodiment.





FIG. 13

is a perspective view of a cleaning utensil according to an exemplary embodiment.





FIG. 14

is a graph showing a stress-strain curve where the vertical axis represents the stress, the horizontal axis represents the strain, and O represents the origin.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring to

FIG. 1

, one example of a dusting pad (shown as a cleaning sheet


10


made of multiple fibers


12


) for collecting, attracting and retaining particulate matter (e.g., dust, soil, other airborne matter, lint, hair, etc. and shown as debris


16


) is shown. Cleaning sheet


10


may include a particle retention surface


30


, which may be increased in charge with an electrostatic force for attracting (e.g., collecting) and retaining debris


16


. When so charged, debris


16


is drawn and/or forced to the particle retention surface


30


as cleaning sheet


10


is moved along a surface to be cleaned (shown as a worksurface


78


in FIG.


13


).




Cleaning sheet


10


may be provided with structural elements intended to increase strength. For example, particle retention surface


30


may be supported by a web or lattice (shown as a scrim


64


in

FIG. 12

supporting fibers


12


). Cleaning sheet


10


can include an optional internal core


32


, which may be located adjacent any side of surface


30


or core


32


, made of an entangled network of fibers


12


(e.g., non-woven, microfibers, etc.) within cleaning sheet


10


. An optional backing layer


14


may be attached to particle retention surface


30


by a fastener (e.g., physical bond, construction adhesives, clips, embossment, hydroentanglement, ultrasonic weld, infrared weld, spot weld, chemical bond, melt bond of thermoplastic melt in localized locations, etc. and shown as a stitch


98


).




The term “non-woven” as used in this disclosure includes a web having a structure of individual fibers or threads which are interlaid, but not necessarily in a regular or identifiable manner as in a knitted fabric. The term also includes individual filaments and strands, yarns or “tows” as well as foams and films that have been fibrillated, apertured, or otherwise treated to impart fabric-like properties. Non-woven fabrics or webs have been formed from many processes such as for example, meltblowing processes, spunbonding processes, and bonded carded web processes. The basis weight of non-woven fabrics is usually expressed in ounces of material per square yard (“osy”) or grams per square meter (“gsm”) and the fiber diameters useful are usually expressed in microns. Basis weights can be converted from osy to gsm simply by multiplying the value in osy by 33.91. According to another suitable embodiment, the fibers may be woven.




Particle retention surface


30


and core


32


can trap, collect, attract and retain a significant amount of particulate matter. Typically, the cleaning sheet is configured to retain at least about 20 g/m


2


of particulate matter, suitably at least about 1-10 g/m


2


, more suitably at least about 1-5 g/m


2


. A pore or cavity


34


for retaining debris


16


can be formed between fibers


12


in core


32


or in particle retention surface


30


. The cavities typically have an average width in the range of about 1 to 10 mm, more suitably 2 to 5 mm, depending in part on the size of the particulate matter intended to be retained, and can have an average depth in the range of about 0.1 to 5 mm, more suitably 1 to 3 mm. The cleaning sheet may have the capacity to retain debris having a relatively small size. The debris typically has an effective diameter of about 5-10 microns. The electrostatic charge of the cleaning sheet may affect the size and density of the particle intended to be collected. Increasing the electrostatic charge can enhance the efficacy of the sheet in entrapping and retaining particles.




The particle retention layer and the core may include a dielectric or conducting material that may be rendered “electret” in whole or in part. The rendering electret of the material in a cleaning sheet may thereby cause an electrostatic charge to build-up on the cleaning sheet. Such build-up of an electrostatic charge may enhance the ability of the cleaning sheet to attract, collect, trap and retain debris during the cleaning process.




The cleaning sheet, or any part thereof, may be rendered electret by “triboelectric charging” techniques. Triboelectric charging is the “electrostatic charge” (commonly referred to as “static electricity”) that may be created by friction. In general, static electricity is an electrical charge caused by an imbalance of electrons on the surface material of an object. The imbalance of electrons produces an electric field that can electrically influence other objects. Static charges on generally non-conductive surface materials (e.g., polystyrene foam, rubber, plastic, etc.) are generally localized across the surface of the object. Charges on generally conductive surface materials (e.g., ungrounded metal, human skin, etc.) are generally evenly distributed across the surface of the object.




Triboelectric charging includes the contact and separation of two similar or dissimilar materials (e.g., a cleaning sheet and a charging surface), which transfers electrons between the materials. For example, an electrostatic charge is generated on an electrostatic field when a shoe sole contacts and then separates from a wood floor surface, and the charge from the electrostatic field is passed by induction to a conductive moisture layer on the foot of the shoe wearer. For example, electrons may be transferred from the foot to the wood floor surface, thereby decreasing the number of electrons in the foot and correspondingly increasing the positive charge of the foot. Referring to

FIG. 2

, one material (e.g., a foot) is shown having an atom


20




a


with three protons


24




a


(relatively tightly bound in a nucleus


22




a


) and three orbiting electrons


26




a


, and another material (e.g., a wood floor) is shown having an atom


20




b


with three of protons


24




b


in a nucleus


22




b


and three orbiting electrons


26




b


. (An atom with more electrons than protons (i.e., an “anion”) will have a negative charge, and an atom with more protons than electrons (i.e., a “cation”) will have a positive charge.) In

FIG. 2

, both atom


20




a


and atom


20




b


each have a net electrical charge of zero, since the three negatively charged electrons cancel the charge of the three positively charged protons. Atom


20




a


and atom


20




b


may be brought into contact (e.g., rubbing, agitating, sliding, etc.) with one another (step


102


).




When atom


20




a


is placed in contact with atom


20




b


(step


102


) and then separated from atom


20




b


(see

FIG. 3

step


104


), an electron


26




a


is transferred (step


106


) from atom


20




a


to atom


20




b


(i.e., atom


20




a


loses electron


26




a


and atom


20




b


gains electron


26




a


). Thus atom


20




a


obtains a positive charge (i.e., having three positively charged protons and two negatively electrons) and atom


20




b


obtains a negative charge (i.e., having three positively charged protons and four negatively charged electrons).




The determination of which materials generally lose electrons and which materials generally gain electrons depends in part on the nature of the materials and their ability to retain or donate electrons. The determination may be predicted by the ranking of materials in the triboelectric series shown in Table 1. Under ideal conditions, if two materials are contacted together and separated, the material listed in Table 1 shown as “most positive” should donate electrons and become positively charged, and the material shown as “most negative” should gain electrons and become negatively charged. Other materials that may be categorized as “most negative” relative to human hands include: acetate fiber, epoxy glass, stainless steel, synthetic rubber, acrylic, polystyrene foam, polyurethane foam, and polyester, respectively. Household debris such as dust, hair and clothing fibers can have either a positive or a negative charge. According to a suitable embodiment, the cleaning sheet has a negative charge and/or is induced with a negative triboelectric charge.















TABLE 1













Air Human Hands Asbestos Rabbit Fur Glass Mica Human Hair Nylon







# Wool Fur Lead Silk Aluminum Paper Cotton Steel Wood Amber Sealing







# Wax Hard Rubber Mylar Nickel, Copper Brass, Silver Gold, Platinum Sulfur Acetate, Rayon Celluloid Polyester Styrene (Styrofoam) Orlon ® yarn


1


Saran ™







# Polyurethane Polyethylene Polypropylene Vinyl (PVC) Kel F ® materials


2


Silicon Teflon ® materials


3


Silicone Rubber



























The triboelectric charge induced in the cleaning sheet may be retained indefinitely, depending in part on the material used, atmospheric conditions (e.g., humidity, temperature, pressure, etc.), handling, etc. For example, in some materials such as facial tissue the triboelectric charge could decay in about a few seconds (depending on atmospheric conditions). In other materials such as a polypropylene scrim, the triboelectric charge could decay in about thirty minutes (depending on atmospheric conditions). The magnitude of charge created by triboelectric charging may be affected in part by factors such as the area of contact of the materials, nature of contact, the speed of separation of the materials, relative humidity of the environment, etc. Examples of the amount of charge created by triboelectric charging are shown in Table 2. As illustrated in Table 2, higher charges tend to be generated under conditions of low relative humidity (e.g., about 10%) than under moderate relative humidity (e.g., about 40-50%). Triboelectrically charged materials also tend to maintain an electrostatic charge longer under low relative humidity than under conditions of moderate to high relative humidity.














TABLE 2













Change in Charge (Volts)







at Specified Relative Humidity














Triboelectric Charging Source




10%




40%




55%

















Walk across carpet




35,000




15,000




7,500






Walk across vinyl tile




12,000




5,000




3,000






Work at seating surface




6,000




500




400






Vinyl envelopes for work




7,000




1,500




750






instructions






Common poly bag picked up from




20,000




6,500




3,000






worksurface






Work at chair padded with




18,000




5,000




3,000






polyurethane foam






Remove circuit boards from




26,000




20,000




7,000






standard bubble wrap






Package circuit boards in




21,000




11,000




550






standard foam-lined box














The cleaning sheet that is induced with a triboelectric charge may transfer at least a portion of the induced charge to another material (e.g., debris) during an electrostatic discharge or ESD event (i.e., the transfer of charge between bodies at different electrical potentials). Referring to

FIG. 4

, the cleaning sheet or material that is induced with a negative triboelectric charge (shown as an atom


20




c


) is shown attracting or pulling a material having a positive charge (shown as a debris particle or atom


20




d


) (step


108


). This is commonly known as the phenomena that “opposite charges attract.” Likewise, opposite or differently charged particles repel or push away particles having an opposite or different charges. (See step


110


of

FIG. 5

showing the repulsion of debris particles or atoms


20




e


and


20




f


each having a negative charge, and the repulsion of debris particles or atoms


20




g


and


20




h


each having a positive charge.)




Without intending to be limited to any particular theory, it is believed that the strength of the electrostatic attraction or repulsion between particles having opposite charges is determined by Coulombs Law, which states:






F
=


k


(

q1
·
q2

)



d
2












where “F” is the force of the attraction or repulsion, “q” is the charge, “d” is the distance between the charges and “k” is the proportionality constant, which depends on the material separating the charges. The strength of the attraction or repulsion between particles having opposite charges may depend on the amount of charge, the distance involved, the shape of the particles, etc.




Referring to

FIG. 6

, a triboelectric charging device or dispensing mechanism (shown as a dispenser


36




a


) for storing multiple cleaning sheets


10


in an interior reservoir or receptacle (shown as a cavity


38


) of a container


40


is shown. Dispenser


36




a


may impart or increase the temporary triboelectric electrostatic charge on cleaning sheet


10


by pulling sheet


10


through an outlet


42




a


of dispenser


36




a


. Referring to

FIG. 7

, cleaning sheet


10


is shown partially drawn through outlet


42




a


. Outlet


42




a


includes a charger


44


having a first charging platform or horizontal shelf (shown as a plate


46




a


) generally coplanar with a second charging platform or flange (shown as a plate


46




b


), which may abut or mate to form a dispensing aperture (shown as a slit


62


). Both sides of cleaning sheet


10


may contact base charging surface


50


of plates


46




a


and


46




b


as sheet


10


is dragged across plates


46




a


and


46




b


. Plates


46




a


and


46




b


may have a sufficiently different value on the triboelectric scale (see Table 1) than the value of cleaning sheet


10


on the triboelectric scale. The resulting friction (e.g., contact and separation) of cleaning sheet


10


against plates


46




a


and


46




b


causes an accumulation of electrostatic charge on sheet


10


.




Plate


46




a


and plate


46




b


are shown attached to container


40


by a mounting structure shown as a bracket


52


. Plate


46




a


and plate


46




b


are shown inserted into a cavity


54


of bracket


52


, which substantially counteracts the upward force applied to plates


46




a


and


46




b


as cleaning sheet


10


is slid upwardly through outlet


42




a


. According to alternative embodiments, any fastener may be used to attach the charging plates to the container (e.g., glue, stitching, clip, lamination, integral formation, etc.).




Referring to

FIG. 10

, an actuator


68


is shown for lifting unused or stored cleaning sheets


10


within cavity


38


of container


40


toward the outlet. Actuator


68


includes a raised floor or base plate


58


for supporting stored cleaning sheets


10


. Base plate


58


is shown supported by an extension mechanism (shown as a compression spring


60


) that is selectively movable between a retracted or lowered position (e.g., when container


40


is full) and an extended or raised position (e.g., when container


40


is less than full). As spring


60


is extended, base plate


58


is raised and stored cleaning sheets


10


are moved toward the outlet for quick and easy removal. According to an alternative embodiment as shown in

FIG. 7

, stored cleaning sheets


10


can be interlocked by folding, such that the removal of one sheet places the underlying sheet in position for removal through the outlet of container


40


(e.g., the removal of one sheet presents the beginning of the second sheet through the outlet). According to other alternative embodiments, the cleaning sheet may be a continuous sheet, which may be cut (or torn at predetermined, pre-cut perforations) at any desired length after withdrawal from the container.




Referring to

FIG. 8

, a dispenser


36




b


is shown according to an alternative embodiment. The structure of an outlet


42




a


of dispenser


36




a


differs from outlet


42




b


of dispenser


36




b


. Other than this difference, the construction, performance and function of dispenser


36




b


is substantially the same as dispenser


36




a


, and like reference numerals are used to identify like elements. Charging plate


46




a


is shown positioned above and slightly overlapping charging plate


46




b


, and plates


46




a


and


46




b


are generally parallel. An auxiliary wall or charging surface


48


of plates


46




a


and


46




b


contacts cleaning sheet


10


as sheet


10


is withdrawn from dispenser


36




b


. In addition, both sides of cleaning sheet


10


may contact charging surface


50


as sheet


10


is withdrawn from dispenser


36




b


. Without intending to be limited to any particular theory, it is believed that dispenser


36




b


is generally capable of imparting a greater triboelectric charge on the cleaning sheet


10


than dispenser


36




a


, due in part to the increased charging surface areas of charging plates


46




a


and


46




b


(relative to charging surface


50


), which contact sheet


10


during its removal from the container.




Referring to

FIG. 9

, a dispenser


36




c


is shown according to an alternative embodiment. The structure of an outlet


42




c


of dispenser


36




c


differs from outlet


42




a


of dispenser


36




a


. Other than this difference, the construction, performance and function of dispenser


36




c


is substantially the same as dispenser


36




a


, and like reference numerals are used to identify like elements. Charging plate


46




a


is shown generally coplanar with a charging plate


46




b


to form slot or slit


62


, similar to plates


46




a


and


46




b


shown in

FIG. 7. A

vertically depending leg (relative to the base of dispenser


36




c


) shown as a charging plate


46




c


and a charging plate


46




d


extends upwardly from each of plates


46




a


and


46




b


, respectively. Plates


46




c


and


46




d


form a “chimney”, ridge or chute, which increases the surface area over which cleaning sheet


10


is in contact (compared to dispenser


36




a


shown in FIG.


7


).




Referring to

FIG. 11

, a dispenser


36




d


is shown according to an alternative embodiment. The structure of an outlet


42




d


of dispenser


36




d


differs somewhat from outlet


42




a


of dispenser


36




a


. Other than this difference, the construction, performance and function of dispenser


36




d


is substantially the same as dispenser


36




a


, and like reference numerals are used to identify like elements. Container


40


is shown having a generally circular or “tube” shape. Multiple protrusions, fingers or tabs (shown as charging plates


46




e


and


46




f


) are shown partially encircling slit


62


. Charging plates


46




e


are “tiered,” stepped, or leveled above charging plates


49


(similar to overlapping charging plates


46




a


and


46




b


shown in FIG.


8


). The elevated charging plates


46




e


provide an increased charging surface


49


, which may frictionally engage sheet


10


as it is drawn through slot


62


.




The charging plates could be made of any material appearing above or below the material on the triboelectric scale (see Table 1) from which the cleaning sheet is composed. According to a suitable embodiment, the charging plates are made of a material to impart a negative charge on the cleaning sheet. Suitably, the charging plates are made from polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”) or TEFLON materials (commercially available from E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company of Wilmington, Del.). According to a suitable embodiment, the charging plate is a rigid sheet or surface. According to other alternative embodiments, the charging plate is a flexible sheet that is held relatively taut, such that there is sufficient friction between the cleaning sheet and the charging plate during dispensing of the cleaning sheet. The container may be made from an insulator through which electrons do not move well according to a suitable embodiment. Suitable insulators could include plastic, cloth, glass and dry air, plastics, rubber and wood. According to an alternative embodiment, the container may be made from a conductor or a semi-conductor. The container may be made of a rigid material such as cardboard according to a suitable embodiment, or may be made of a semi-rigid material such as a plastic or a relatively thin film according to other alternative embodiments.




The cleaning sheet may include a non-woven fabric formed from fibers or micro-fibers. The fibers used in the cleaning sheet are typically formed from thermoplastic materials. Thermoplastic materials are believed to retain an electrostatic charge for relatively long periods. Thermoplastic materials or fibers may include, without limitation, polyesters, polyamides and polyolefins, polypropylene, polyethylene, polystyrene, polycarbonate, nylon, rayon, acrylic, etc. and combinations thereof. The thermoplastic materials may be produced by a melt blown process. According to a suitable embodiment, the cleaning sheet can be a spinbond or thermal bond polypropylene.




The fibers may also include synthetic materials such as polyolefins (such as, polypropylene and polybutene), polyesters (such as polyethylene, polyurethane terephthalate and polybutylene terephthalate), polyamides (such as nylon 6 and nylon 66), acrylonitriles, vinyl polymers and vinylidene polymers (such as polyvinyl chloride and polyvinylidene chloride), and modified polymers, alloys, and semi-synthetic materials such as acetate and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTE) fibers. The fibers may also include natural materials such as rubber, latex, cotton, blends of cotton, wool, cellulose and the like. The fibers may also include regenerated or recyclable fibers such as Cupra, rayon and acrylics. The fibers may also include combinations of synthetic materials, semi-synthetic materials, natural materials, regenerated or recyclable materials, and combinations thereof. The core can be made of a porous sponge or foam. Suitable foams include polyurethane foams and latex foams. Other suitable foams include phenolic resin foams. According to other suitable embodiments, the cleaning sheet and fibers may be made of other materials that have a relatively high dust retention capacity.




The cleaning sheet may be made of a fabric material (e.g., a continuous sheet as shown in

FIG. 9

) according to an exemplary embodiment. According to a suitable embodiment, the fabric may be non-woven. Non-woven fabrics may be made by mechanically (such as by hydroentanglement), chemically or thermally interlocking layers or networks of fibers (or filaments or yarns). Non-woven fabrics may be made by interlocking fibers or filaments concurrent with their extrusion and/or by perforating relatively thin films. According to alternative embodiments, the fabric material may be woven, such as those traditional textile fabrics made by weaving (i.e., the interlacing of two or more yam sets at right angles on a loom), or by knitting (i.e., the interlooping of one or more yarns upon itself or themselves).




The fibers may be rendered electret by any variety of methods. According to a preferred embodiment, the fibers may be rendered electret by using triboelectric effects, as described in the following Examples 1 through 6. According to alternative embodiments, the fibers can be rendered electret by coating them with an electret material such as a wax. The fibers may also be rendered electret by spinning them in a strong electrostatic field. The fibers may also be rendered electret by passing them by a charged electrode. According to a suitable embodiment, at least 20% of the fibers are rendered electret (by weight percentage), and in some instances as much as 50-100% of the fiber materials may be electret.




The rendering electret of the cleaning sheets may induce or impart a total or increased electrostatic charge greater than about 500 V, suitably more than about 800-900 V, more suitably more than about 1200-1500 V, most suitably between about 2000-4000 V. The fibers may have a charge suitably in the range of about 1×10


−11


to 1×10


−11


coulombs/cm


2


, more suitably about 1×10


−5


to 1×10


−3


coulombs/cm


2


.




At least a portion of the particle retention surface, core and/or scrim of the cleaning sheet may be indirectly rendered electret by application of an electret wax (i.e., a material that has been rendered relatively permanently electrically charged) according to alternative embodiments. Cleaning sheets having applied wax electrets are described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/605,021 titled “Particle Entrapment System” filed on Jun. 29, 2000, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.




The fibers (e.g., woven and non-woven) of the cleaning sheet may be directly rendered electret directly (e.g., without the application of an electret wax) according to other alternative embodiments. Such cleaning sheets having fibrous electrets are described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/605,021 titled “Particle Entrapment System” filed on Jun. 29, 2000.




According to alternative embodiments, the cleaning sheet may also be rendered electret by ferroelectric effects, wherein a ferroelectric material exhibits oppositely polarized charge on its two surfaces because of applied pressure. According to other suitable embodiments, the cleaning sheet may be rendered electret by applying light (instead of a charge) at room temperature (e.g., illumination with 6000 lux of light). According to still other suitable embodiments, certain photoelectric insulating or semi-conducting materials of the cleaning sheet may be rendered electret under the combined influence of illumination and a strong electric field.




Referring to

FIG. 12

, a web or lattice (shown scrim


64


) may support fibers


12


of cleaning sheet


10


. Use of the web can allow the production of sheets that have a relatively low entanglement coefficient (e.g., no more than about 800 m) while retaining sufficient strength to be used for cleaning. Scrim


64


may include a net having horizontal members


66


attached to vertical members


56


arranged in a “network” configuration. Spaces (shown as holes


70


) are formed between vertical members


56


and horizontal members


66


to give scrim


64


a mesh or lattice-like structure. According to various embodiments, the horizontal and vertical members of the scrim may be connected together in a variety of ways such as woven, spot welded, cinched, tied, etc. The average diameter of holes


70


generally falls within the range of 20 to 500 mm, and more suitably between 100 to 200 mm. The distance between the fibers typically falls within about 2 to 30 mm, and more suitably within about 4 to 20 mm. Alternatively, the non-woven sheet may be reinforced by filaments embedded in the sheet which are held in place simply by the mechanical forces resulting from hydroentangling or “air punching” microfibers around the filaments.




Fibers


12


of cleaning sheet


10


may be overlaid on each side of scrim


64


to attach fibers


12


to scrim


64


, thereby forming cleaning sheet


10


as a unitary piece or structure. A low-pressure water jet may be subsequently applied to entangle the fibers to each other and to scrim


64


(i.e., hydroentanglement) to form a relatively lose entanglement of non-woven fibers. Hydroentanglement of the fibers may be further increased during removal (e.g., drying) of the water from the water jet. (The scrim may also “shrink” somewhat during drying to create a fabric having a “puckered” or contoured surface.) The fibers may also be attached to the web (i.e., scrim) by a variety of other conventional methods (e.g., air laid, adhesive, woven, etc.). The fibers are typically entangled onto the web to form a unitary body, which assists in preventing “shedding” or loss of the fibers from the web during cleaning. The web may be formed from a variety of suitable materials, such as polypropylene, nylon, polyester, etc. An exemplary web (i.e., scrim) is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,525,397, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.




The core (e.g., core


32


as shown in

FIG. 1

) may include a non-woven aggregate layer having fibers with a relatively large degree freedom and sufficient strength, which may be advantageous for effectively collecting and retaining dust and larger particulates within the cleaning sheet. In general, a non-woven fabric formed by the entanglement of fibers involves a higher degree of freedom of the constituent fibers than in a non-woven fabric formed only by fusion or adhesion of fibers. The non-woven fabric formed by the entanglement of fibers can exhibit better dust collecting performance through the entanglement between dust and the fibers of the non-woven fabric. The degree of the entanglement of the fibers can have a relatively large effect on the retention of dust. That is, if the entanglement becomes too strong, the freedom of fibers to move will be lower and the retention of dust will be generally decreased. In contrast, if the entanglement of the fibers is relatively weak, the strength of the non-woven fabric can be markedly lower, and the processability of the non-woven fabric may be problematic due to its lack of strength. Also, shedding of fibers from the non-woven fabric is more likely to occur from a non-woven aggregate with a relatively low degree of entanglement.




The backing layer (e.g., backing layer


16


shown in

FIG. 1

) may be more rigid and/or have a greater basis weight than the core and/or particle retention surface to provide support and structure to the cleaning sheet. According to suitable embodiments, a space or other intermediate layer(s) may be positioned between the backing layer and the outer fabric layer. A variety of materials are suitable for use as a backing layer, as this layer has the desired degree of flexibility and is capable of providing sufficient support to the sheet as a whole. Examples of suitable materials for use as a backing layer include a wide variety of relatively lightweight (e.g., having a basis weight of about 10 to 75 g/m


2


), flexible materials capable of providing the sheet with sufficient strength to resist tearing or stretching during use. The backing layer is typically relatively thin (e.g., has a thickness of about 0.05 mm to about 0.5 mm) and can be relatively non-porous. Examples of suitable materials include spunbond and thermal bond non-woven sheets formed from synthetic and/or natural polymers. Other backing materials that can be utilized to produce the cleaning sheet include relatively non-porous, flexible layers formed from polyester, polyamide, polyolefin or mixtures thereof. The backing layer could also be made of hydroentangled non-woven fibers, if it meets the performance criteria necessary for the particular application. One specific example of a suitable backing layer is a spunbond polypropylene sheet with a basis weight of about 20 to 50 g/m


2


.




The degree of entanglement of the fibers in the sheet can be measured by an “entanglement coefficient.” The entanglement coefficient is also referred to as the “CD initial modulus.” The term “entanglement coefficient” as used in this disclosure refers to the initial gradient of the stress-strain curve measured with respect to the direction perpendicular to the fiber orientation in the fiber aggregate (cross machine direction). The term “stress” as used in this disclosure means a value which is obtained by dividing the tensile load value by the chucking width (i.e., the width of the test strip during the measurement of the tensile strength) and the basis weight of the non-woven fiber aggregate. The term “strain” as used in this disclosure is a measure of the elongation of the cleaning sheet material.




A relatively small value of the entanglement coefficient generally represents a smaller degree of entanglement of the fibers. The entanglement coefficient may be controlled in part by selection of the type and quantity of fibers, the weight of the fibers, the amount and pressure of the water, etc. (See U.S. Pat. No. 5,525,397 at col. 4, line 52—col. 5, line 26 discussing entanglement of fibers.) If the entanglement coefficient is relatively small (e.g., no more than about 10 to 20 m), the fibers will not be sufficiently entangled together. In addition, the entanglement between the fibers and the scrim will likely be poor as well. As a result, shedding of the fibers may occur frequently. If the entanglement coefficient is relatively large (e.g., greater than about 700 to 800 m), a sufficient degree of freedom of the fibers cannot be obtained due to strong entanglement. This can prevent the fibers from easily entangling with dust, hair and/or other debris, and the cleaning performance of the sheet may not be satisfactory.




Suitable non-woven fiber aggregates for use in forming the cleaning sheet may have an entanglement coefficient in the range of about 20 to 500 m (as measured after any reinforcing filaments or network has been removed from the non-woven fibrous web) and, more typically, no more than about 250 m. A suitable non-woven aggregate for use in producing the cleaning sheet can be formed by hydroentangling a fiber web (with or without embedded supporting filaments or a network sheet) under a relatively low pressure. For example, the fibers in a carded polyester non-woven web can be sufficiently entangled with a network sheet by processing the non-woven fiber webs with water jetted at high speed under about 25-50 kg/cm


3


of pressure. The water can be jetted from orifices positioned above the web as it passes over a substantially smooth non-porous supporting drum or belt. The orifices typically have a diameter ranging between 0.05 and 0.2 mm and can be suitably arranged in rows beneath a water supply pipe at intervals of 2 meters or less.




In cases where the entanglement coefficient of the fiber aggregate is to be set at a maximum value of about 800 m, it may be difficult for a sheet, which is constituted only of a fiber aggregate, to achieve the values of sufficient breaking strength and elongation. By entangling fibers


12


to scrim


64


(as shown in

FIG. 12

) into a unitary body, the elongation of this layer is kept low and its processability can be enhanced. Shedding of the fibers from the cleaning sheet can often be markedly prevented as compared with a conventional entangled sheet, which is constituted only of a fiber aggregate in approximately the same entanglement state as that in the fiber aggregate of the cleaning sheet.




The cleaning sheet typically includes a non-woven fiber aggregate (e.g., core) having a relatively low basis weight. The basis weight of the non-woven fiber aggregate generally falls within the range of about 30 to 100 g/m


2


, and typically no more than about 75 g/m


2


. If the basis weight of the non-woven fiber aggregate is less than about 30 g/m


2


, dust may pass too easily through the non-woven fiber aggregate during the cleaning operation and its dust collecting capacity may be limited. If the basis weight of the non-woven fiber aggregate is too large (e.g., substantially greater than about 150 g/m


2


), the fibers in the non-woven fiber aggregate (if any) generally may not be sufficiently entangled with each other to achieve a desirable degree of entanglement. In addition, the processability of the non-woven fiber aggregate can worsen, and shedding of the fibers from the cleaning sheet may occur more frequently.




The term “denier” as used in this disclosure is defined as the weight in grams of a 9000 meter length of fiber. The denier of the fibers of the particle retention surface is suitably about 0.1-6, more suitably about 0.5-3. The denier of the fibers in the non-woven fiber aggregate, the length, the cross-sectional shape and the strength of the fibers used in the non-woven fiber aggregate are generally determined in view of processability and cost, in addition to factors relating to performance.




Cleaning sheet


10


may be used alone (e.g., as a rag) or in combination with other implements and utensils to clean worksurface


78


. Cleaning sheet


10


is generally flexible for following any contour (e.g., smooth, jagged, irregular, creviced, etc.) of a worksurface


78


to be cleaned. Accordingly, cleaning sheet


10


is particularly suitable for cleaning hard, rigid surfaces. According to another embodiment, cleaning sheet


10


may be semi-rigid and particularly suitable for cleaning planar surfaces. Cleaning sheet


10


may also be used to clean relatively soft surfaces such as carpets, rugs, upholstery and other soft articles.




Referring to

FIG. 13

, cleaning sheet


10


is shown attached to a cleaning head


74


of a cleaning utensil (shown as a dust mop


72


) according to an exemplary embodiment. Head


74


includes a carriage


84


providing a fastener (shown as a spring clip


86


) for mounting cleaning sheet


10


. A mounting structure


88


attaches an elongate rigid member (shown as a segmented handle


76


) to carriage


84


. Mounting structure


88


includes a yoke (shown as an arm


90


) having a y-shaped end


92


pivotally mounted to a socket (shown as a ball joint


94


). An adapter (shown as a connector


96


) threadably attaches arm


90


to handle


76


. According to suitable embodiments, the cleaning utensil may be a broom, brush, polisher, handle or the like adapted to secure the cleaning sheet. The cleaning sheet may be attached to the cleaning utensil by any of a variety of fasteners (e.g., friction clips, screws, adhesives, retaining fingers, etc.). According to other suitable embodiments, the cleaning sheet may be attached as a single unit or as a plurality of sheets (e.g., strips, strings or “hairs” of a mop).




The components of the cleaning utensil, namely the mounting structure, adapter, handle, wax that may have been rendered electret, and the charging device may be provided individually or in combinations (e.g., as a kit or package). The components of the cleaning utensil may be readily, easily and quickly assembled and disassembled in the field (e.g., work site, home, office, etc.) or at the point of sale for compactability and quick replacement. The cleaning utensil may also be provided in a pre-assembled and/or unitary condition. According to a suitable embodiment, the cleaning sheet is configured for use with the PLEDGE GRAB-IT™ sweeper (commercially available from S.C. Johnson & Son, Incorporated of Racine, Wis.).




To clean worksurface


78


, cleaning sheet


10


may be secured to head


74


of mop


72


by clip


86


. Cleaning sheet


10


is brought into contact with worksurface


78


and moved along worksurface


78


(e.g., in a horizontal direction, vertical direction, rotating motion, linear motion, etc.). Debris


16


from worksurface


78


is provided or electrically attracted to particle retention surface


30


. An electrostatic charge of particle retention surface


30


may pull or draw debris


16


to cleaning sheet


10


(see FIG.


4


). After use, cleaning sheet


10


may be removed from mop


72


for disposal, cleaning (e.g., washing, shaking, removing debris, etc.), recycling, etc. According to other suitable embodiments, the cleaning sheet may be used alone (e.g., hand held) to clean the surface.




Cleaning implements and methods of cleaning surfaces using the cleaning sheet are also provided. The cleaning implement may be produced as an intact implement or in the form of a cleaning utensil kit. Intact implements may include gloves, dusters and rollers. Kits according to the present invention, which are designed to be used for cleaning surfaces, commonly include a cleaning head and a cleaning sheet capable of being coupled to the cleaning head. In addition, the kit can include a yoke capable of installation on the cleaning head and an elongate handle for attachment to the yoke. Whether provided as a completely assembled cleaning implement or as a kit, the cleaning implement may include a cleaning head that allows the cleaning sheet to be removably attached to the cleaning head.




A cleaning sheet sample may be tested for breaking strength (cross machine direction). From each of the cleaning sheets, samples having a width of 30 mm may be cut out in the direction perpendicular to the fiber orientation in the sheet (i.e., in the cross machine direction). The sample may be chucked with a chuck-to-chuck distance of 100 mm in a tensile testing machine and elongated at a rate of 300 mm/min in the direction perpendicular to the fiber orientation. The value of load at which the sheet began to break (the first peak value of the continuous curve obtained by the stress/strain measurement) may be taken as the breaking strength.




A cleaning sheet sample may be tested for elongation at a load of 500 g/30 mm. The breaking strength in the cross machine direction, as described above, may be measured. For the purposes of this test, “elongation” is defined as the relative increase in length (in %) of a 30 mm strip of cleaning sheet material when a tensile load of 500 g is applied to the strip.




A cleaning sheet sample may be tested for entanglement coefficient. The scrim may be removed from the non-woven fiber aggregate. Where the scrim has a lattice-like net structure, this is typically accomplished by cutting the fibers that make up the network sheet at their junctures and removing the fragments of the network sheet from the non-woven fiber aggregate with a tweezers. A sample having a width of 15 mm may be cut out in the direction perpendicular to the fiber orientation in the sheet (i.e., in the cross machine direction). The sample may be chucked with a chuck-to-chuck distance of 50 mm in a tensile testing machine, and elongated at a rate of 30 mm/min in the direction perpendicular to the fiber orientation (in the cross machine direction). The tensile load value F (in grams) with respect to the elongation of the sample may be measured. The value, which is obtained by dividing the tensile load value F by the sample width (in meters) and the basis weight of the non-woven fiber aggregate W (in g/m


2


), is taken as the stress, S (in meters). A stress-strain curve is obtained by plotting stress (“S”) against the elongation (“strain” in %) (i.e., stress S [m]=(F/0.015)/W).




For a non-woven fiber aggregate, which is held together only through the entanglement of the fibers, a straight-line relationship is generally obtained at the initial stage of the stress-strain (elongation) curve. The gradient of the straight line is calculated as the entanglement coefficient E (in meters). For example, in the illustrative stress-strain curve shown in

FIG. 14

(where the vertical axis represents the stress, the horizontal axis represents the strain, and O represents the origin), the limit of straight-line relationship is represented by P, the stress at P is represented by S


p


, and the strain at P is represented by γ


p


as a percentage. In such cases, the entanglement coefficient is calculated as E=S


p





p


. For example, when S


p


=60 m and γ


p


=86%, E is calculated as E=60/0.86=70 m. It should be noted that the line OP is not always strictly straight. In such cases, a straight line approximates the line OP.




Varieties of sample cleaning sheets having differing material compositions were induced with a triboelectric charge using a triboelectric charging device. Some of the samples may retain at least a portion of the induced triboelectric charge for about one day. The test methodology and results are outlined in the following Examples.




EXAMPLE 1




The triboelectric charge induced in a sample of non-oiled PLEDGE GRAB-IT™ sweeper cloth (i.e., including a polyester with polypropylene reinforcement, and made by a hydroentanglement process) when drawn through a charging device was measured. The charging device included two generally co-planar charge transfer media (substantially as in FIGS.


6


and


7


). The charge of the sample was measured using a model no. 344 electrostatic voltmeter having a range of 0 to +/−2000 V commercially available from Trek Inc. of Medina, N.Y.




The voltmeter was set to a “0” value. A piece of the sample was inserted through a dispensing mechanism of the charging device. About one inch of the sample was exposed outside of the dispensing mechanism, and the remaining sample was left inside of the dispensing mechanism. Before the sample was pulled through the dispensing mechanism, a first reading of a portion of sample inside the dispensing mechanism was taken at a distance of about 6 inch from the probe of the meter. The sample was then pulled through the mechanism at a relatively rapid rate. After the sample was pulled through the dispensing mechanism, a second reading of a portion of the sample outside the dispensing mechanism was taken at a distance of about 6 inch from the probe of the meter. The results of the test are shown in Table 3. In Tables 3 through 8, voltage readings are positive or negative; negative readings are indicated with a “−” symbol.
















TABLE 3











Charge Before




Charge After




Charge Difference







Mechanism (v)




Mechanism (v)




(v)



























1




−157




−1060




−903






2




−331




−976




−645






3




−207




−860




−653






4




−579




−1751




−1172






5




−82




−381




−299






6




−212




−821




−609






7




−353




−1030




−677






8




−277




−707




−430






9




−245




−849




−604






10




−163




−861




−698






Ave:




−261




−903




−669














As shown for trial 1 in Table 3, the charge of the cleaning sheet after dispensing through the charging mechanism increased by about 250%.




EXAMPLE 2




The triboelectric charge induced in a sample of non-oiled PLEDGE GRAB-IT™ sweeper cloth (i.e., including a polyester with polypropylene reinforcement, and made by a hydroentanglement process) when drawn through a charging device was measured. The test methodology was substantially the same as the test methodology of Example 1, except that the charging device included two generally overlapping charge transfer media plates (substantially as shown in FIG.


8


). The results of the test are shown in Table 4.
















TABLE 4











Charge Before




Charge After




Charge Difference







Mechanism (v)




Mechanism (v)




(v)



























1




−412




−1549




−1137






2




−345




−1327




−982






3




−175




−1256




−1081






4




−89




−1596




−1507






5




−116




−1096




−980






6




−365




−1050




−685






7




−374




−1698




−1324






8




−111




−1079




−968






9




−197




−1093




−896






10




−224




−1218




−994






Ave:




−241




−1296




−1055.4














EXAMPLE 3




The electrostatic charge applied to a sample of PLEDGE GRAB-IT™ sweeper cloth commercially available from S.C. Johnson & Son, Incorporated of Racine, Wis. (i.e., 5% mineral oil by weight percent of total cloth weight, including a polyester with polypropylene reinforcement, and made by a hydroentanglement process) when drawn through a charging device was measured. The test methodology was substantially the same as the test methodology of Example 1. As in Example 1, the charging device included two generally co-planar charge transfer media (substantially as shown in FIGS.


6


and


7


). The results of the test are shown in Table 5.
















TABLE 5











Charge Before




Charge After




Charge Difference







Mechanism (v)




Mechanism (v)




(v)



























1




6




6




0






2




−9




−1




8






3




−5




−3




2






4




0




−4




−4






5




1




2




1






6




0




1




1






7




0




0




0






8




−3




−2




1






9




−4




−8




−4






10




−4




−11




−7






Ave:




−1.8




−2




−0.2














EXAMPLE 4




The absolute magnitude of the electrostatic charge applied to a sample of GRAB-IT™ sweeper cloth commercially available from S.C. Johnson & Son, Incorporated of Racine, Wis. (i.e., 5% mineral oil by weight percent of total cloth weight, including a polyester with polypropylene reinforcement, and made by a hydroentanglement process) when drawn through a charging device was measured. The test methodology was substantially the same as the test methodology of Example 1, except that the charging device included two generally overlapping charge transfer media plates ally as shown in FIG.


8


). The results of the test are shown in Table 6.
















TABLE 6











Charge Before




Charge After




Charge Difference







Mechanism (v)




Mechanism (v)




(v)



























1




4




721




717






2




0




733




733






3




0




422




422






4




0




50




50






5




4




271




267






6




0




378




378






7




−4




270




274






8




8




470




462






9




−3




613




616






10




−2




439




441






Ave:




1




437




436














EXAMPLE 5




A sample of non-oiled cloth (i.e., polyester/polypropylene blend, and made by a needlepunch process) was first run through an electric field (e.g., one side of the sample drawn past a positive electrode and the other side of the sample drawn past a negative electrode without either side substantially touching either of the electrodes). The sample was stored for about one year. The electrostatic charge applied was measured after the sample was then drawn through a charging device. The test methodology was substantially the same as the test methodology of Example 1. As in Example 1, the charging device included two generally co-planar charge transfer media (substantially as shown in FIG.


7


). The results of the test are shown in Table 7.
















TABLE 7











Charge Before




Charge After




Charge Difference







Mechanism (v)




Mechanism (v)




(v)



























1




20




340




320






2




44




226




182






3




22




325




303






4




25




284




259






5




0




305




305






6




−25




230




255






7




−78




188




266






8




10




332




322






9




0




259




259






10




−9




225




234






Ave:




1




271




270.5














EXAMPLE 6




A sample of non-oiled cloth (i.e., polyester/polypropylene blend, and made by a needlepunch process) was first run through an electric field (e.g., one side of the sample drawn past a positive electrode and the other side of the sample drawn past a negative electrode without side substantially touching either of the electrodes). The sample was stored for about one year. The electrostatic charge applied was measured after the sample was then drawn through a charging device. The test methodology was substantially the same as the test methodology of Example 1, except that the charging device included two generally overlapping charge transfer media plates (substantially as shown in FIG.


8


). The results of the test are shown in Table 8.
















TABLE 8











Charge Before




Charge After




Charge Difference







Mechanism (v)




Mechanism (v)




(v)



























1




−7




1611




1618






2




10




1864




1854






3




30




1189




1159






4




−13




1932




1945






5




−6




1837




1843






6




1




1199




1198






7




−13




1276




1289






8




−58




1838




1896






9




36




1084




1048






10




33




1959




1936






Ave:




1




1579




1577.6














Although only a few exemplary embodiments have been described, the present invention is not limited to one particular embodiment. Indeed, to practice the invention in a given context, those skilled in the art may conceive of variants to the embodiments described herein (e.g., variations in sizes, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, etc.) without materially departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the charging device can have an outlet having a variety of configurations such as a slit, a slot, and orifice, etc. according to alternative embodiments. Multiple charging plates can be oriented in a variety of locations along the outlet according to alternative embodiments. The cleaning sheet may be dragged across multiple charging plates according to alternative embodiments. Various modifications may be made to the details of the disclosure without departing from the spirit of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A system for cleaning and removing particles from a surface comprising:a cleaning sheet for collecting and retaining the particles having a basis weight of at least about 30 g/m2; a container for housing and dispensing the cleaning sheet, the container comprising at least one charging surface configured to frictionally engage the cleaning sheet; wherein the cleaning sheet has a charge that is increased by at least about 500 V when the cleaning sheet is passed across the charging surface.
  • 2. The system of claim 1 wherein the cleaning sheet comprises no more than about 5 weight % oil.
  • 3. The system of claim 2 wherein a charge of at least about 1500 V is induced in the sheet when the cleaning sheet is dispensed through an outlet.
  • 4. The system of claim 2 wherein a charge of at least about 1.0×10−11 C/cm2 is imparted to the cleaning sheet when the cleaning sheet is passed across the charging surface.
  • 5. The system of claim 2 wherein the cleaning sheet is capable of retaining a charge of at least about 1500 V for at least about 5 minutes at 10% relative humidity.
  • 6. The system of claim 5 wherein the cleaning sheet is capable of retaining a charge of at least about 1500 V for at least about 1 hour at 10% relative humidity.
  • 7. The system of claim 1 wherein the cleaning sheet has a breaking strength of at least about 500 g/30 cm.
  • 8. The system of claim 1 wherein the charge in the cleaning sheet is increased by at least about 1000 V when the cleaning sheet is passed along the charging surface.
  • 9. The system of claim 1 wherein the cleaning sheet has an elongation of no more than about 25% at a load of about 500 g/30 mm.
  • 10. The system of claim 1 wherein the cleaning sheet is configured to attract particles having a size less than about 10 microns in diameter.
  • 11. The system of claim 1 wherein the cleaning sheet has a particle retention capacity of at least about 20 g/m2.
  • 12. The system of claim 1 wherein the cleaning sheet comprises a plurality of fibers selected from the group comprising polyester fibers, polyamide fibers, polyolefin fibers, polystyrene fibers, polycarbonate fibers, rayon fibers, acrylic fibers, and combinations thereof.
  • 13. The system of claim 12 wherein the cleaning sheet further comprises a reinforcing scrim structure.
  • 14. The system of claim 12 wherein at least two of the plurality of fibers are coupled to each other by at least one of hydroentanglement or air punching.
  • 15. The system of claim 1 wherein the cleaning sheet comprises an electret wax.
  • 16. The system of claim 1 wherein the first charging surface is selected from the group comprising wood, amber, sealing wax, hard rubber, sulfur, acetate, rayon, polyester, styrene, styrofoam, orlon, saran, polyurethane, polyethylene, polypropylene, vinyl, PVC, silicon, Teflon and combinations thereof.
  • 17. The system of claim 1 wherein the first charging surface is selected from the group comprising steel, nickel, copper, brass, silver, gold, platinum and combinations thereof.
  • 18. The system of claim 16 wherein the container comprises a generally non-conducting material.
  • 19. The system of claim 18 wherein the container comprises a cardboard.
  • 20. A system for inducing an electric charge in a cleaning sheet for cleaning and removing particles from a surface comprising:a container having an interior receptacle configured for housing a plurality of cleaning sheets; an outlet for dispensing at least one of the plurality of cleaning sheets, wherein the outlet includes a first charging surface and a second charging surface; wherein the first and second charging surfaces are each configured to frictionally engage at least one of the plurality of the cleaning sheets as the cleaning sheet is dispensed through the outlet, thereby inducing an electrostatic charge in the cleaning sheet.
  • 21. The system of claim 20 wherein the first charging surface is generally coplanar with the second charging surface.
  • 22. The system of claim 21 wherein the first charging surface includes a sheet of material generally parallel to a base of the container and the second charging surface includes a sheet of material generally parallel to the base of the container.
  • 23. The system of claim 22 wherein the first charging surface further comprises a sheet of material generally perpendicular to the base of the container and the second charging surface includes a sheet of material generally perpendicular to the base of the container.
  • 24. The system of claim 22 wherein at least one of the first and second charging surfaces are configured to induce a negative charge on the cleaning sheet.
  • 25. A method of inducing an electric charge in a cleaning sheet for cleaning and removing particles from a surface comprising:dispensing the cleaning sheet from a generally nonconductive container comprising a first charging surface such that frictionally engaging the cleaning sheet against the first charging surface induces an electrostatic charge of at least about 1000 V in the sheet; wherein the cleaning sheet has a basis weight of at least about 30 g/m2.
  • 26. The method of claim 25 wherein the charge on the sheet is retained for at least about 5 minutes at a humidity of no more than 10% relative humidity.
  • 27. The method of claim 25 wherein the generally nonconductive container further comprises a second charging surface.
  • 28. The method of claim 25 comprising engaging the cleaning sheet against the first charging surface and the second charging surface.
  • 29. The method of claim 28 comprising sequentially engaging the cleaning sheet against the first and second charging surfaces.
  • 30. The method of claim 28 comprising simultaneously engaging the cleaning sheet against the first and second charging surfaces.
  • 31. A method of cleaning a surface comprising:dispensing a cleaning sheet from a generally nonconductive container comprising at least one charging surface such that frictionally engaging the cleaning sheet against the first charging surface increases an electrostatic charge of the cleaning sheet by at least about 500 V; and contacting the surface with the cleaning sheet; wherein the cleaning sheet has a basis weight of at least about 30 g/m2.
  • 32. A kit for cleaning surfaces and collecting and retaining debris comprising:a cleaning head; a cleaning sheet adapted for coupling to the head; and a container for housing and dispensing the cleaning sheet and having at least one charging surface configured to frictionally engage the cleaning sheet as the cleaning sheet is dispensed from the container; wherein the charging surface is configured to induce a charge of at least about 1000 V in the cleaning sheet when the cleaning sheet is dispensed from the container.
US Referenced Citations (72)
Number Name Date Kind
1804364 Parker May 1931 A
1886235 Meissner Nov 1932 A
1957591 Heckert May 1934 A
2024705 Rutherford Dec 1935 A
2284039 Bruno May 1942 A
2460109 Southworth Jan 1949 A
2618803 Parmet Nov 1952 A
2724457 Besser Nov 1955 A
2740184 Thomas Apr 1956 A
2986524 Padgett May 1961 A
3118022 Sessler et al. Jan 1964 A
3144671 Gould et al. Aug 1964 A
3193912 Polin Jul 1965 A
3240212 Royster Mar 1966 A
3301786 Klass Jan 1967 A
3307332 Grace et al. Mar 1967 A
3316620 Stewart, Jr. May 1967 A
3325003 Bilezerian Jun 1967 A
3354373 Fatovic Nov 1967 A
3449094 Baxt et al. Jun 1969 A
3458713 Perlman et al. Jul 1969 A
3463168 Troll et al. Aug 1969 A
3485708 Ballou et al. Dec 1969 A
3487610 Brown et al. Jan 1970 A
3494821 Evans Feb 1970 A
3496013 Baxt et al. Feb 1970 A
3496461 Sessler et al. Feb 1970 A
3571679 Turnhout Mar 1971 A
3612778 Murphy Oct 1971 A
3616157 Smith Oct 1971 A
3632443 Kodera et al. Jan 1972 A
3644605 Sessler et al. Feb 1972 A
3965518 Muoio Jun 1976 A
3965519 Hermann Jun 1976 A
3968790 Fukada et al. Jul 1976 A
4095303 Armstrong et al. Jun 1978 A
4144370 Boulton Mar 1979 A
4172172 Suzuki et al. Oct 1979 A
4232128 Michel et al. Nov 1980 A
4276338 Ludwa et al. Jun 1981 A
4333021 Cresap et al. Jun 1982 A
4352846 Pässler et al. Oct 1982 A
4355021 Mahl et al. Oct 1982 A
4373224 Bandai et al. Feb 1983 A
4457456 Derby et al. Jul 1984 A
4486365 Kliemann et al. Dec 1984 A
4603069 Haq et al. Jul 1986 A
4612237 Frankenburg Sep 1986 A
4683001 Floyd et al. Jul 1987 A
4845512 Arway Jul 1989 A
4874659 Ando et al. Oct 1989 A
4906513 Kebbell et al. Mar 1990 A
4993099 Emura et al. Feb 1991 A
5057710 Nishiura et al. Oct 1991 A
5300248 Pässler et al. Apr 1994 A
5310590 Tochacek et al. May 1994 A
5325992 Koller et al. Jul 1994 A
5429848 Ando et al. Jul 1995 A
5486411 Hassenboehler, Jr. et al. Jan 1996 A
5525397 Shizuno et al. Jun 1996 A
5599550 Kohlruss et al. Feb 1997 A
5671498 Martin et al. Sep 1997 A
5706804 Baumann et al. Jan 1998 A
5725927 Zilg et al. Mar 1998 A
5726107 Dahringer et al. Mar 1998 A
5817584 Singer et al. Oct 1998 A
5830810 Cohen Nov 1998 A
5834384 Cohen et al. Nov 1998 A
5871845 Dahringer et al. Feb 1999 A
5895504 Sramek et al. Apr 1999 A
5940054 Harris Aug 1999 A
6054071 Mikkelsen, Jr. Apr 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
0 721 760 Jul 1996 EP
0 865 755 Sep 1998 EP
0 872 206 Oct 1998 EP
292479 Jun 1929 GB
2 069 327 Aug 1981 GB
63-48981 Oct 1988 JP
5-25763 Feb 1993 JP
10262883 Oct 1998 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (20)
Entry
Author unknown, Early History of Electrets, 1 page, (Undated).
Bhatnagar et al., Electrical Conductivity of Carnauba Wax Using Different Electrodes, pp. 20-24, (1954).
Gemant, Phil. Mag. S. 7., 20, Recent Investigations on Electrets, pp. 929-951, (1935).
Gross, State of the Art Review, 6, “Electret Devices For Air Pollution Control”, pp. 1-10, (1972).
Gross, pp. 115-119 (Undated).
Gutmann, Reviews of Modern Physics, 20, “The Electret”, pp. 457-472, (1948).
Scotch Brite™ Lens Cleaning Cloth Label, 1 sheet, (On sale at least by Jun. 1, 2000).
Technostat, Air Filter Media, Filtration & Separation, pp. 197-202 (4 color sheets), bearing a designation of Mar. 1996.
Technostat, Cabin Air Filtration, 4 color sheets (undated).
Letcher, Kirk-Other Concise Encyclopedia Of Chemical Technology, 24, “Waxes”, pp. 1259-1260, (©1985).
Luminex™ Ultrafine Cleaning Cloth, 2 sheets, (Undated).
Swedish Microfiber Trasan® Cleaning Cloth, Internet web page, titled “How Trasan® Cloths and Mops clean using only water”, available at http://www.trasan.com/microfiber.html, pp. 1-4, bearing a designation of May 22, 1997.
‘Toray’, Internet web page, titled “Toraysee* @ Ultra Fine Micro-Fiber Cleaning Cloth”, available at http://www.toray.co.jp/e/jigyou/shohin/shohin_3.html, 1 sheet, bearing a designation “Last Updated Nov. 17, 1997”.
“Toraysee” Luminex™ Ultrafine Microfiber Cleaning Cloth, 6 sheets, (Undated).
Trasan® Cloths and Mops, Internet web page, titled “Trasan® Cloths”, available at http://www.trasan.com/products.html, pp. 1-3, bearing a designation of Jun. 27, 1997.
Trasan® Swedish Miracle Microfiber Cleaning Cloths and Mops, Internet web page, titled “Trasan®, Inc. ‘Your Environmentally Friendly Cleaning Companions’® Main Page”, available at http://www.trasan.com/index.html, bearing a designation of Jun. 13, 1997.
AllerCare Allergy Asthma Prevention, “Cleaning”, http://www.allercare.com.sg/products/clean.asp, bearing a designation of “Oct. 16, 2000” (sheet).
Plug-In Storage Systems Inc., “Save the Boards”, http://www.pluginstorage.com/html/save_the_boards_html, bearing a designation of Nov. 17, 2000 (9 sheets).
The ESD Association, “Basics of Electrostatic Discharge Part One—An Introduction to ESD,” http://www.borg.com/˜eosesd/cebasics.html, bearing a designation of “© 1996, 1997, 1998” (8 sheets).
Science Made Simple, “What is Static Electricity?,” http://www.sciencemadesimple.com/static.html, bearing a designation of “© 1996, 2000”(8 sheets).