Patent Application
20210041198
The present disclosure relates to a firing mechanism for a firearm, particularly an open-bolt automatic or semiautomatic firearm.
A machine gun is traditionally a weapon used for suppressive firing. The purpose of suppressing the firing is to pepper the combat zone with a significant quantity of projectiles. The weapon employed is then described in terms of its “firepower”.
In order to perform this suppressive firing, it is preferable to fire from an ammunition belt because this allows a significant quantity of rounds to be fired without the need to take a break to change the magazine.
Because of this significant quantity of rounds fired, the weapon and the barrel heat up very significantly. As a result, there is a significant risk that the powder of a cartridge in the chamber of the barrel waiting to be fired may cook off. Cook-off is therefore an untimely and undesired letting-off of a shot (the shooter has not pressed the trigger of the weapon in order to command the firing). “Closed-bolt” guns all display this safety fault risk. Closed-bolt operation means that the breech is locked to the chamber of the barrel awaiting the release of a shot. By contrast, conventionally, machine guns generally fire “open-bolt”, namely without the breech being locked to the chamber of the barrel in readiness for firing. The breech is at the rear of the frame, waiting to be released in order to feed a round into the chamber. Thus, the risk of cook-off in open-bolt operation is zero because the round waiting to be fired is in a cold zone (away from the chamber of the barrel).
Because they are used at high rates of fire, the firing mechanism generally includes only an automatic function. What that means is that the weapon fires only in bursts. It does not fire in a semiautomatic manner, namely fire just one shot each time the trigger is squeezed. Closed-bolt guns often have dual functionality: semiautomatic-fire and automatic-fire.
Historically, the principle of fire control for machine guns has changed very little since the MG42 developed in Germany during the second world war. The firing mechanism is made up of a trigger blade, a stop halting the moving parts in the open position, at the rear of the frame, and a release lever keeping the stop in the lowered position during the forward movement of the moving parts. In order to release the moving parts (the breech and the breech block) so that they can move, it is necessary to squeeze the trigger which pushes on the stop to retract it out of the path of the moving parts. During this movement of the trigger, the front end of the stop is intercepted by the release lever which is not in the path of the moving parts as long as the operator is pressing on the trigger blade. When the operator releases the trigger blade, the release lever returns into the path of the moving parts, keeping the stop in the firing position until the moving parts recoil. When the moving parts recoil, they push the release lever rearward, and this releases the stop. The moving parts are then once again immobilized by the stop in the rearward position, under the pressure of the weapon recoil spring.
The release mechanism makes it possible to a certain extent to limit wear on the stop sear because it ensures that the moving parts come to rest in the most rearward possible position. When the moving parts are rearward, their speeds are low, and this means that the kinetic energy of the moving parts, which will be imparted to the stop when they are halted, will be at its minimum. In addition, this mechanism makes it possible to avoid the risk of the moving parts not being retained by the anti-runaway catch so that the machine gun does not suffer from a lack of recoil. The anti-runaway catch is an immobilizing catch underneath the moving parts allowing these to be immobilized when they do not recoil far enough to catch on the normal catch. In the absence of such a catch, a lack of recoil may prevent the moving parts from catching on the stop when the trigger blade is released, leading to a burst being fired even though the operator is attempting to cease fire. In order to prevent such “runaway”, the anti-runaway catch is arranged in such a way as to immobilize the moving parts in terms of their forward movement just after having caught on the rear of the awaiting cartridge. In this way, a lack of recoil that would not catch on the anti-runaway catch cannot load the new cartridge, thus preventing continuing fire.
On the MG 42 and the weapons based on the firing mechanism thereof, safety is achieved by a push-button system transverse to the axis of the barrel of the weapon. In the position that allows automatic fire, the push-button allows the lowering of the stop, which releases the moving parts. When the safety is on, the stop butts against the push-button before the moving parts are able to disengage from the stop sear. This particularly simple and effective mechanism does not allow the weapon to be re-cocked while the safety is on and neither does it allow semiautomatic firing.
The firing mechanisms of open-bolt weapons do not all have the release-lever system. In the absence of a release lever, the trigger blade controls the stop directly. That means that it is possible that the operator might release the stop while the moving parts are moving forward. If that happens, the stop will not necessarily catch on the moving parts with optimal (face-against-face) contact, and will do so with the moving parts potentially moving at high speed (if the stop catch intercepted by the stop is not the catch that corresponds to the moving parts in the rearward position but is in fact the anti-runaway catch), and that means that the wear on the stop sear is increased by comparison with that of a mechanism that does have a release lever. Excessive damage to the stop sear may compromise the safety and reliability of the weapon.
With this system, safety consists of a mobile pin that is transverse to the weapon and that limits the movement of the stop when the weapon is in the “safe” position. That means that the weapon cannot be re-cocked if the safety is on because the stop is unable to retract out of the path of the moving parts as these recoil. Another consequence is that the safety cannot be engaged if the moving parts are forward because the release lever keeps the stop out of the way as long as the moving parts have not been recoiled by hand.
In order to allow an open-bolt weapon to be re-cocked when its safety is on, patent EP 2205925 B1 describes a particular mechanism in which the stop is made up of two parts: a stop lever and a safety lever. A spring between the stop lever and the safety lever forces the latter into a position of rest so that it no longer performs its function of butting against the fire selector when the moving parts are pulled rearward with the safety on. When the moving parts return forward under the influence of the recoil spring, the moving parts cause the safety lever to pivot and they stop on the stop lever. In pivoting, the safety lever moves into a position which allows it to perform a function of limiting the travel of the stop when the safety is on.
One disadvantage with the system proposed in patent EP 2205925 B1 is that, in order to allow the user to engage the safety whatever the condition of the weapon, it is necessary to leave the trigger blade a certain degree of movement, even in the safe position. In order to allow the travel of the trigger blade to be completely immobilized by the safety lever, patent EP 2831531 B1 describes a mechanism that is modified in such a way as to allow the user to engage the safety whatever the position of the stop. In this new mechanism, the trigger blade and the release lever have been disconnected through the introduction of an intermediate component. As a result, the travel of the trigger blade can be canceled by the fire selector when the latter is in the safe position, and that being while the stop is kept in the lowered position by the release lever.
The mechanisms set out in patents EP 2205925 B1 and EP 2831531 B1 have a major shortcoming in terms of the safety of the weapon particularly in adverse condition. The position of rest of the safety lever is obtained by means of a spring and corresponds to a position that allows disengagement of the moving parts. That means that the safety lever is more readily liable to become jammed in a position that allows the moving parts to be released by the stop by debris of a relatively modest size that may slip in between the stop and the safety lever. If that happens, the weapon can be placed in the safe position and exhibit all the signs of a weapon that is safe even though the travel of the stop is not in any way limited. Under such circumstances the weapon presents a major risk to its operator and the entire combat unit because the weapon is handled as if it were free of danger even though there is nothing to prevent the moving parts from being released by the stop. The fact that incorporating the safety lever directly onto the stop entails the use of very small components (safety lever return spring, safety lever, safety lever pin, etc.), each of which may be the cause of a failure means that the probability of this risky situation befalling the weapon is all the greater.
Another disadvantage with the system set out in EP 2205925 B1 and EP 2831531 B1 is the fact that the safety lever bears directly against the safety pin (pivoting lever acting as a two-position fire selector, the positions being: safe and automatic). This design has the disadvantage that the load associated with limiting the movement of the stop is transferred onto a component that is intermediate with respect to the trigger-guard. Aside from the intrinsically poorer control over the position of the stop when the safety is on (the manufacturing spread on each of the components is cumulative, so the more components there are, the less precise the positioning), it should be noted that the contact that limits the movements of the stop (between the safety lever and the safety pin) is on a cam-shaped part. This cam shape is needed in order to allow the stop to move when the selector lever is in the automatic-fire position, and also to allow the stop to lower when the moving parts are returned rearward with the safety on.
In patents EP 2205925 B1 and EP 2831531 B1, the selector moves from the “safe” position to the “auto” position by rotation of the safety pin. This rotational movement is an ergonomic plus-point for the operator, although uncertainty over the angular position (which is not necessarily associated with a manufacturing defect with the weapon but also with uncertain handling on the part of the operator or environmental influences, etc.) of the safety pin will carry with it a significant risk to the safety of anybody in the vicinity of the machine gun. This is because poor angular positioning of the safety pin will result in the possibility of the safety lever skidding against the surface of the cam and thus allow the stop to move, allowing a shot to be let off accidentally.
Finally, another disadvantage with the firing mechanism described in patents EP 2205925 B1 and EP 2831531 B1 is the lack of a semiautomatic-fire function. The absence of the ability to achieve semiautomatic fire compromises the flexibility of a machine gun that is supposed to be versatile. The need for weapon versatility is connected with issues of deployment and particularly the level at which the weapon is to be distributed.
Historically, weapons that operate on the open-bolt principle but do not fire ammunition belts have had both a semiautomatic function and an automatic function. Notable mention may be made of the Bren light machine gun and the Uzi submachine gun. These weapons are hybrids between support weapons and individual weapons and allow their operators to perform a support role for a limited duration in support of other operators using weapons of more limited fire power (a rifle or a pistol). However, a magazine-feed has intrinsic limits that do not allow the user of a light machine gun (or of a submachine gun) to sustain their fire power for a long enough period to be able to provide as much support as can be provided by a machine gun.
Semiautomatic operation of these open-bolt weapons is often achieved by a disconnector between the trigger blade and the stop. The travel of the trigger blade is more limited when the fire selector is in the automatic-fire position, which means that the trigger blade keeps the stop in a lowered position (out of reach of the stop catches on the moving parts). When the fire selector is in the semiautomatic-fire position, the travel of the trigger blade is enough for the disconnector to come into abutment before the trigger blade and to release the stop which intercepts the moving parts after the first shot fired. While this solution has been acceptable for certain weapons for a while, it does have the disadvantage of being theoretically fallible if the operator squeezes the trigger blade hard enough to release the slide but not hard enough for the travel to be executed in full. When that happens, the weapon fires a burst even though the operator was expecting a single shot, and this is a major safety issue.
In order to maintain a trigger blade travel that is the same whether the selector is in the semiautomatic-fire position or in the automatic-fire position, the fire selector of the UZI submachine gun acts not on the travel of the trigger blade but on the disconnector directly. When the selector is in the semiautomatic-fire position, there is a buffer stop on the movement of the disconnector which thus releases the stop. This solution is particularly simple, but does not address the risk of firing a burst when the fire selector is in the semiautomatic-fire position. This issue is nevertheless limited by the drop in effort required on the trigger blade at the moment at which the moving parts disengage.
This principle was readopted in patent US 2011/0168008 A1 to allow a MAG 58 (M240) machine gun a semiautomatic-fire operation. In addition to the safety defect of such a system in semiautomatic-fire mode, the main disadvantage with this mechanism is the absence of the release-lever system that is, however, present in the MAG 58 and M240 machine guns. In the absence of the release-lever mechanism, wearing of the stop sear is enough of a problem to compromise reliability (variation of the effort required on the trigger blade, which will be interpreted as degraded operation) and safety (the moving parts do not catch as securely on the stop sear) of the weapon during its service life.
In order to allow the creation of a more dependable semiautomatic-fire mode, the designers of the BREN light machine gun opted for a mechanism with a very specific disconnector. This disconnector has two contact possibilities to cause the stop to be lowered and a protuberance that is able to enter the path of the moving parts. When the selector is in the automatic-fire position, the disconnector joins the trigger blade to the stop via the bottom of the latter so that the protuberance of the disconnector is not in the path of the moving parts. In that case, the travel of the trigger blade is somewhat long with a fairly small effort (the lever arm of the disconnector on the stop is at its maximum length). When the fire selector is in the semiautomatic-fire position, the disconnector is in the raised position so that the protuberance lies in the path of the moving parts. When the operator presses the trigger, the effort is transmitted to the stop which releases the moving parts. As the moving parts move forward, they press against the disconnector which releases the stop to move upward. This happens as soon as the moving parts are released, which means that the stop is once again in a position to halt the moving parts after the first shot fired. Because the connection between the disconnector and the stop is from the top, the lever arm of the disconnector on the stop is short. This results in a reduction in the travel of the trigger blade with maximum effort to trigger the shot.
The various embodiments seek to address at least one of the following problems:
The present embodiments relate to a trigger device of an open-bolt fire arm comprising a stop for halting the forward movement of moving parts, a release lever for lifting the stop during the recoil movement of the moving parts, a rocker actuating the stop and the release lever at the start and end of firing, and a trigger blade connected to the rocker by a disconnector able to pivot from a position of mechanical coupling between the trigger blade and the rocker to a position of mechanical uncoupling between the trigger blade and the rocker, the rocker pivoting from a firing position to a rest position when the disconnector pivots from its coupling position to its uncoupling position, so as to prevent the next shot from being let off when the trigger blade is kept in the firing position.
In the present embodiments, what is meant by the moving parts is all of the parts set in motion by the weapon reload cycle. This is, for example, an assembly comprising a slide in which a bolt moves, the slide being able to be attached to a gas recoil piston. It may also more simply relate to a breech in the case of a non-locked breech.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the stop takes the form of an elongate lever pivoting on a central axis which, when the rear of said lever is in the raised position, prevents the forward movement of the moving parts by bearing against an immobilizing catch of the moving parts or on an anti-runaway catch situated under the moving parts.
Advantageously, the release lever is a lever that is essentially vertical positioned on a pivot pin at the front of the stop, the upper part of which is held forward by a release-lever spring and which in its lower part comprises a release-lever pawl bearing against a release-lever lug situated on the rocker.
As a preference, the rocker is positioned on a pivot pin common to the trigger and to the rocker and in its forward part comprises a release-lever lug against which the release-lever pawl can bear when the release lever is coupled to the rocker.
Advantageously, the rocker in its upper part comprises a rocker control lug bearing under the front part of the stop and controlling the pivoting of the stop.
Advantageously, rotational coupling between the rocker and the trigger blade is provided by the disconnector in the form of a lever arranged on a pivot pin fixed to the rocker, said lever bearing via a disconnector lug fixed to the trigger blade. The pressure of the disconnector on the disconnector lug is provided for example by a disconnector spring, but could be provided by other means known to those skilled in the art, such as the mechanical force of a disconnector fixed on its pin and operating like a leaf spring.
Advantageously, the disconnection between the trigger blade and the rocker is obtained by a buffer in the device, which buffer is positioned in the path of the disconnector
Alternatively and as a preference, the disconnector is arranged in such a way that the forward movement of the moving parts disconnects the mechanical connection between the rocker and the trigger blade
As a preference, the moving parts comprise a cam on their lower surface which is arranged in such a way as to disconnect the mechanical coupling between the rocker and the trigger blade during the forward movement of the moving parts.
Advantageously, the trigger device of the invention comprises a disconnector sear able to occupy a rest position or a disconnection position, said disconnector sear comprising a disconnection lever arranged, when in the disconnection position, between the rocker and the disconnector and a disconnection cam controlled by the movement of the moving parts, the disconnector disconnecting the mechanical connection between the rocker and the trigger blade when a cam under the moving parts moves the disconnection cam.
As a preference, the disconnector comprises:
As a preference, the preferred alternative of the invention comprises a fire selector enabling selection between a semiautomatic-fire function and an automatic-fire function.
Advantageously, the selection of the semiautomatic-fire or automatic-fire mode is performed by altering the point at which the disconnector bears against the trigger blade or the rocker so that the disconnector cannot disconnect the trigger blade from the rocker when the automatic-fire mode is selected.
As a preference, the selection of the semiautomatic-fire or automatic-fire mode is performed by moving the disconnector sear out of the path of the moving parts and out of the path of the disconnector so that the disconnector cannot disconnect the trigger blade from the rocker when the automatic-fire mode is selected.
Advantageously, the device of the invention comprises a safety function allowing the rearming function when the safety is engaged, said safety function being performed by a safety element comprising an immobilizing surface allowing the stop to be immobilized in the position in which it halts the moving parts, said safety element bearing against a fixed part of the weapon and being able to be moved aside by the moving parts when these pass from a forward position to a rearward position. In this configuration, the function of selecting the semiautomatic-fire function and the function of selecting the safety function are preferably performed by the same control.
As a preference, the control mechanism consists of a rotary lever actuating a slider operating in translation and allowing activation or deactivation of the functions associated with semiautomatic-fire, automatic-fire and safety, so that three positions of the lever correspond to a safety position, to a semiautomatic-fire position, and to an automatic-fire position.
Advantageously, the slider comprises a safety control slot in which there moves a safety control lug arranged on the safety element, the shape of said safety control slot being determined so that when the selector lever is in the safety position, the safety element can move between a position of immobilizing the stop and a position of not immobilizing the stop, and when the lever is in another position, the safety element is in the position of not immobilizing the stop.
As a preference, the slider comprises a disconnector-sear control slot in which there moves a disconnector-sear control lug arranged on the disconnector sear, the shape of said disconnector-sear control slot being determined so that when the selector lever is in the semiautomatic position, the disconnector sear can move between its disconnection position and its rest position, and when the lever is in an automatic position, the disconnector sear is immobilized in the rest position, out of the path of the moving parts.
Advantageously, the various slots in the slider comprise notches in which the various lugs become lodged when the selector is in a selection position, so as to prevent the selector from being able to find a position of stable equilibrium between two positions, rendering the weapon status poorly defined.
a show a cross section of the device of
There are two requirements to be taken into consideration when developing a safety mechanism that allows a machine gun to meet safety criteria similar to those of a gun (in terms of the way in which the weapon is handled):
Achieving these two functions must not compromise operator safety from the moment the fire selector is in the safe position.
In order to achieve this, according to the invention, when the fire selector is in the safe position, the travel of the stop is limited by a safety element that bears against an immobile part of the weapon. This safety element can be retracted out of the path of the stop to allow the moving part to move from the front toward the rear of the weapon. Cams under the moving parts allow this retraction. A return spring returns the safety element into the path of the stop each time a stop catch of the moving parts passes beyond the stop sear.
The fire selector is connected to the safety element in such a way as to allow it an amplitude of movement when the fire selector is in the safe position, but which forces the safety element to retract out of the path of the stop when the fire selector in a (semiautomatic-fire or automatic-fire) fire position.
On a gun, engagement of the safety is manifested by the blocking of the movement of the trigger blade and the inability of the weapon to fire. The possibility of engaging the safety of a weapon regardless of its condition is an important factor because it reduces the risk to the operator without adding to the complexity of the handling of the weapon.
In order to allow the safety to be engaged and the weapon to be reloaded by the operator while the stop is held in the lowered position by the release lever, the release lever is mounted to rotate not on the trigger blade but directly on the stop or on a mobile rocker positioned between the trigger blade and the release lever.
As a preference, when the release lever is mounted on the stop, the connection between the release lever and the trigger blade is via a hook-shaped pawl that allows the trigger blade to return to its rest position even if the release lever continues to hold the stop in a lowered position. This particular feature makes it possible to overcome the problem of engaging the safety of the weapon regardless of its condition by dispensing with the dividing of the trigger blade into two parts which is the solution proposed in patent EP 2831531 B1 (which is a more expensive solution). Nevertheless, an intermediate rocker may prove beneficial for use in semiautomatic-fire mode. In that case, the release-lever pawl bears not directly on the trigger blade but on the intermediate rocker. Note that in this case, the rocker is of benefit only for semiautomatic-fire: during re-cocking with the safety on, the rocker is not necessarily disconnected from the trigger blade.
In terms of achieving a safety that allows handling similar to that of a gun, the indispensable factor is the presence of a safety element which bears against a rigid part of the weapon, limiting the travel of the stop so as to prevent the moving parts from moving, but which can be retracted by the moving parts when these are in rearward motion.
As a preference, the release lever is mounted on the stop and not on the trigger blade, making it possible to incorporate into the fire selector a buffer that limits the travel of the trigger blade while at the same time allowing the weapon to be made safe whatever the condition of the weapon. Limiting the travel of the trigger blade is a simple and effective indicator to indicate to the operator that the fire selector is in the safe position.
Advantageously, the direction of retraction of the safety element is forward, so that the action of the moving parts as they move rearward on the safety element is interrupted before the stop catch of the moving parts has moved fully beyond the stop sear. Thus, the safety element resumes its function as soon as the stop moves back up after having overcome each stop catch of the moving parts so that there is no risk of an intermediate position in which the moving parts could rest against the stop without the safety being on.
Reversing the direction of retraction of the safety element and the permitted movement of the moving parts can be achieved via oblique contact between the two assemblies (cam shapes) or via an intermediate lever between the two assemblies.
If it is not possible to adhere to the arrangement regarding reversing the permitted direction of movement of the moving parts and the retraction movement of the safety element, it is nevertheless important to advance release of the safety element by the moving parts in comparison with the overcoming of the stop sear by the stop catch of the moving parts. That can be achieved via longitudinal offsetting of the rack that retracts the safety element by comparison with the stop catches of the moving parts, or by longitudinal offsetting of the index that retracts the safety element with respect to the position of the stop sear.
In order to allow the semiautomatic operation to be achieved, the firing mechanism has been modified according to the following principle:
Alternatively, disconnection can be achieved by a buffer positioned in the path of the disconnector. According to a first alternative, this buffer is positioned in the path of the disconnector only when the fire selector is in the semiautomatic position. According to a second alternative, the buffer is fixed but the travel of the trigger blade is limited in automatic mode in order to prevent contact between the buffer and the disconnector.
In the case of disconnection by the moving parts, the function of disconnection between the rocker and the trigger blade can be achieved by a single component if the travel of the trigger blade differs between automatic-fire mode and semiautomatic-fire mode. In that case, the moving parts act directly on the disconnector when the fire selector is in the semiautomatic position. This method is simple to embody but has the disadvantage of modifying the control effort required of the operator depending on whether he is firing in semiautomatic or in automatic mode.
It is not uncommon to observe a difference in the grouping of the impacts of a weapon (precision error) according to the variation in control effort required of the operator. In effect, the operator will have applied a different aim-off to his weapon if he needs to pull differently on the trigger blade when firing a burst or firing single shots. In addition, a significant variation in the effort or travel needed to release the moving parts may be interpreted by the operator as a weapon malfunction. This potential for confusion between the operation of the weapon and degraded operation has a tendency to sap the confidence that the operator has in his weapon which he believes to be of inferior quality.
For this reason, it is preferable, in order to achieve disconnection, to resort to a two-component mechanism (the two components namely being the disconnector and a disconnector sear). In this type of mechanism, the disconnector always acts between the trigger blade and the rocker, but the disconnection command is communicated by the moving parts to the disconnector via the disconnector sear. In that case, the fire selector acts no longer on the travel of the trigger blade but on the position of the disconnector sear prior to firing. When the fire selector is in the semiautomatic-fire position, the disconnector sear is in a position at rest in the path of the moving parts, whereas when the fire selector is in the automatic-fire position, the disconnector sear is positioned in a position out of the path of the moving parts.
Finally, it should be noted that while there is no need for the fire selector that allows the weapon to be made safe to be the same as the selector allowing the selection to be made between semiautomatic operation and automatic operation, it is preferable for the choice between these various functions to be made via the same control in the form of a three-position rotary lever. The connection between the lever and the various elements involved in achieving the safe and semiautomatic functions may be direct. In that case, it may be complicated to control simultaneously numerous components that may potentially be distant from one another.
Another aspect of the invention therefore relates to a selector slider that converts the position of the lever into a possible position of the components (particularly the safety element and the disconnector sear) via slots the shape of which makes it possible either to immobilize (or limit the movement of) the lugs on the components that are to be controlled, or to leave said lug a certain degree of freedom (for example in the case of the safety). This slider is particularly advantageous in the example described hereinafter, but is more generally advantageous whenever the various elements that are to be controlled are numerous and distant from one another.
It may be advantageous for the link between the fire selector and the selector slider to be a meshing connection of the rack and pinion type. Nevertheless, other alternatives are possible (an eccentric on the selector entering a vertical oblong hole in the selector slider, or a linkage/crank system, etc.).
Finally, in order to make it possible to achieve a combination between a system incorporating the semiautomatic function and the safety system that allows the weapon to be re-cocked in a small amount of space, it may be beneficial for the firing-selector pin also to act as the pivot pin for the stop.
This device comprises a stop 5 that allows the moving parts 2 to be halted in a rearward position by bearing against notches formed in the bottom of the moving parts 2.
This stop 5 comprises in its front part a pin 16 supporting a release lever 10. This release lever at its base comprises a pawl 15. The assembly made up of stop and release lever is fixed to the devices via a pin 29. This release lever 10 allows the stop 5 to be held out of the path of the moving parts 2 as they move forward, even when the trigger blade 13 is released. Positioning the release lever 10 at the end of the stop allows the weapon to be made safe and reloaded whatever the condition of the weapon.
A rocker 12 is positioned between the trigger blade 13 and the stop 5. This rocker 12 allows the trigger blade 13 to be disconnected from the stop 5 and this, as will be seen later on, will allow semiautomatic-fire to be selected.
The semiautomatic-fire function is essentially implemented through the presence of a disconnector 11 and of a disconnector sear 14, allowing the trigger blade 13 to be disconnected from the rocker 12.
The safety function is essentially implemented by the addition of a safety element 1 and the presence of an immobilizing lug 34 of the trigger blade 13.
The various modes of operation of the weapon, namely safe, single-shot firing or automatic firing, are selected by means of a slider 20 actuated by a meshing slider-control mechanism 26 arranged on a pin 29 and actuated by the fire selector 24.
As can be seen, the moving parts 2 are immobilized in the rearward position by the stop 5, the stop 5 also being maintained in the raised position by the safety element 1 immobilizing the buffer 9 of the stop in the raised position. This safety element 1 is kept in this position by a spring 6. It may be seen in this situation that pressure on the trigger blade 13 will not allow the stop to be moved and the moving parts to be released.
It may also be noted that the safety control slot 21 of the slider 20 allows the safety element to rotate and therefore retract when the moving parts are moved rearward.
This retraction is brought about by the sliding of the sliding surface 3 on the corresponding surfaces 4 under the moving parts.
Furthermore, the movement of the rocker 12 is limited by the lug 19 in the slot 22 and the movement of the trigger blade 13 is limited by the immobilizing lug 34 of the trigger blade 13 that bears on the underside of the slider 20.
When the trigger blade 13 is squeezed, it rotates about the pin 17, driving the rocker 12 which pushes via the rocker control lug 19 on the stop 5, leading to the release of the moving parts 2. The coupling between the trigger blade 13 and the rocker 12 is provided by the disconnector 11 rotating about a pin fixed to the rocker 12 and catching on a lug 30 on the trigger blade 13.
As the stop 5 moves it drives upward the release lever 10 of which the pawl 15 catches on the release-lever lug 31 on the rocker 12. This catching will allow the stop 5 to be kept out of the path of the moving parts as they move forward.
A lever 35 of the disconnector sear 14 positions itself between the rocker 12 and the disconnector 11 so that when the moving parts 2 are pressing on the cam 36 of the disconnector sear 14, said lever 35 disengages the disconnector 11 from the lug 30 of the trigger blade 13. This disengagement has the effect of causing the rocker 12 to return to its rest position, placing the release lever 10 in the path of the moving parts 2.
During the rearward return movement of the moving parts 2, these disengage the release lever 10 from the lug 31 of the rocker, thereby allowing the stop 5 to return to its position in which it immobilizes the moving parts forward.
In
In any case, in semiautomatic mode, the disconnector returns to its position of coupling between the trigger blade 13 and the rocker 12 when the trigger blade is released by the operator.
a show two cross sections of the device of
When the trigger blade 13 is squeezed, the lug 19 causes the stop 5 to pivot and this causes an upward movement of the release lever 10 of which the hook-like pawl 15 catches on the lug 31. When the trigger blade is released, the stop 5 is held in position out of the path of the moving parts by the release lever 10, until the rearward movement of the moving parts 2 which, in passing, disengage the release lever 10 from the rocker 12.
Note that as an alternative, the disconnector pin could easily be positioned on the trigger blade, and the disconnector lug or lugs on the rocker.
As shown in
Exemplary embodiments are described herein. Variations of those exemplary embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18156026.9 | Feb 2018 | EP | regional |
This application is a US National Phase application claiming priority to International Application No. PCT/EP2019/052995, filed on Feb. 7, 2019, which claims priority to EP Patent Application No. 18156026.9, filed on Feb. 9, 2018. All of the afore-mentioned patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2019/052995 | 2/7/2019 | WO | 00 |
