The invention relates generally to paintball markers and other projectile launching devices. The present invention relates to the assembly, operation and control of a trigger of a projectile launcher, such as a paintball marker, and the firing of projectiles therefrom. The present invention particularly relates to the launching of a projectiles in an electronic paintball marker and other such devices.
The present invention relates to any type of projectile launcher, such as a paintball marker or firearm. For ease of discussion herein, this description relates solely to paintball markers and the control of triggers therein. However, it should be understood that the present invention is applicable to any type of projectile launcher and the scope of the present invention and the claims herein are intended to cover such projectile launchers other than paintball launchers.
However, it is also well known that it is possible, on only one pull or a partial pull of the trigger, a marker can operate automatically, i.e. firing multiple paintballs without fully releasing the trigger or fully pulling the trigger. This is known as “trigger bounce” in the paintball and weapon industries. Trigger bounce can occur in markers that have mechanical or electrical triggers.
In markers that have mechanical triggers, a trigger is pulled to open a pneumatic valve via a mechanical linkage to release a burst of air from an air supply to launch the paintball through the marker barrel. Such operation is well known in the art and need not be discussed in further detail herein.
As seen in the prior art paintball marker 10 of
Such trigger bounce can also occur in triggers 18 that use electronic sensors or electronic switches to determine trigger position. Such electronic sensors (not shown in
By way of example, a trigger equipped with an optical sensor 22 is shown in
Most importantly, a prong 40 protrudes from the rear of the trigger 18 passing through a slot in the grip frame 20. When the trigger 18 is operated the prong 40 passes through a slotted optical sensor 22, having a light emitter 22a and a light receiver 22b. More specifically, light emitter 22a emits light toward light receiver 22b. When the light receiver 22b senses the full strength of the light emitted from light emitter 22a, a non-firing position can be indicated. When the prong 40 completely blocks the light receiver 22b, a firing position can be indicated.
A typical optical sensor 22 used in a paintball marker 10 has a 1.2 millimeters diameter view. Thus, a trigger stroke length of 1.2 millimeters can be monitored. Different optical sensors with different diameters can be used and still be within the scope of the present invention. It should also be understood that the trigger construction of
Also, a threshold level can be set so that when the trigger 18 blocks a certain amount of light to the light receiver 35b, a firing position can also be indicated. Such a threshold can be set anywhere from 0 to 100 percent light blockage but it is typically in the range of 40–60 percent light blockage to indicate a firing condition. Therefore, the optical sensor 22 can detect trigger position along its path of travel.
In this example that employs an optical sensor 22 to sense trigger position, trigger bounce occurs when the trigger 18 is partially pulled and cycles slowly between a position just above and just below the threshold level for triggering. The resultant recoil of the marker 10 during the physical firing and movement of the bolt therein (not shown) causes the trigger 18 to move between the two aforementioned positions resulting in the marker 10 operating in a simulated automatic mode of operation.
Thus, it is very common in the use of paintball markers 10 to exploit the recoil of the marker during firing while holding the trigger 18 down to enable the marker 10 to fire automatically without pulling the trigger 18 again. The firing of multiple paintballs 16 from only a single pull of the trigger 18 is highly undesirable as it contravenes typical paintball competition rules. While players are penalized for such rules infractions, trigger bounce is still exploited during game play.
In view of the foregoing, there is a need for a way to enforce paintball rules that prohibit automatic firing by exploiting trigger bounce. There is a further need to control the operation of the paintball marker itself to ensure that a single trigger pull results in only one paintball being fired.
The present invention preserves the advantages of prior art trigger systems for paintball markers. In addition, it provides new advantages not found in currently available trigger systems and overcomes many disadvantages of such currently available systems.
The invention is generally directed to the novel and unique method of preventing trigger bounce during the launching of a projectile by a projectile launcher, such as a paintball marker. The method of the present invention includes the step of first providing a projectile launcher having a trigger capable of actuating between a full non-firing position and a full firing position. An amount of time is determined for the trigger to normally transition from a full non-firing position to a full firing position. A sensor, such as an analog optical sensor, is used to sense position of the trigger. If the time for the trigger to transition from a non-firing position to a firing position exceeds the time for the trigger to normally transition from a full non-firing position to a full firing position, launch of the projectile is followed by an enforced time delay during which no subsequent projectile launches can occur while requiring that the trigger be released to a full non-firing position.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method of controlling the firing operation of a paintball marker.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for controlling the operation of the trigger in a paintball marker.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method of monitoring the position of the trigger in a paintball marker.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for preventing trigger bounce in a paintball marker that employs an analog sensor to monitor trigger position.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method to prevent trigger bounce from permitting a non-automatic paintball marker from operating in an automatic firing mode.
The novel features which are characteristic of the present invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, the invention's preferred embodiments, together with further objects and attendant advantages, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
The prior art operation of an analog sensor 22, such as an optical sensor, to control triggering in a paintball marker 10 is discussed in detail in connection with
Referring first to
To understand the appearance of invalid trigger bounce signal, a valid signal must first be understood.
Also, the trigger activation point 56 can be 50% (equating to about 2.5 volts, for example) of the overall travel or stroke of the trigger 18. The actual trigger activation point 56 can be programmed and set as desired.
Initiating a firing sequence based on the sensor 22 reaching a given point 56 is well known in the art and need not be further discussed herein. It should also be understood that a typical sensor 22 has a LOW signal 52 when the trigger is released and a HIGH signal 58 when the trigger is depressed. Certain sensors and the appropriate circuitry therefor can be designed for the opposite arrangement where a HIGH signal represents a trigger released condition and a LOW signal represents a trigger depressed condition. The method of the present invention can be modified to accommodate such a sensor.
Still referring to
As shown in the chart in
In
In contrast, Line B represents a signal received from a trigger pull that has an unusually long transition time 68 from LOW 62 to HIGH state 66. A transition time that exceeds a preferred time of 10 milliseconds, indicates that the user is intentionally only partially pulling the trigger 18 for the purposes of exploiting the trigger bounce effect. This transition tolerance specifies the amount of time that the trigger can take to move past the optical sensor 22. The transition tolerance parameter can be set within the filtering software to be a given amount. If that amount is exceeded, the filtering software senses a trigger bounce condition. Thus, the present invention provides a HIGH pass-type filter to detect a trigger bounce condition.
Turning now to
Still further, the method of the present can employ additional parameters for the purpose of setting forth a benchmark for determining when there is a trigger bounce operation. For example, minimum times can be set for the trigger to remain released or depressed. Referring back to
Turning now to
As the trigger bounce is allowed to continue over time, the more the trigger pulls resemble valid trigger pulls. However, if the signal of
The trigger transition filter of the present invention can be easily incorporated into an existing operating system of a marker 10. Any algorithm can be employed to carry out the method of the present invention. Further, the filter at 46 of
It would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made to the illustrated embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present invention. All such modifications and changes are intended to be covered by the appended claims.
This application is related to and claims priority from earlier filed provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/534,563, filed Jan. 6, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4106074 | Conne | Aug 1978 | A |
4109557 | Zaucha | Aug 1978 | A |
4256013 | Quitadama | Mar 1981 | A |
4495848 | Rozner et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
5303495 | Harthcock | Apr 1994 | A |
5575269 | Harklau | Nov 1996 | A |
5727538 | Ellis | Mar 1998 | A |
5890479 | Morin | Apr 1999 | A |
5937558 | Gerard | Aug 1999 | A |
6123007 | O'Dwyer | Sep 2000 | A |
6142137 | MacLaughlin | Nov 2000 | A |
6311682 | Rice et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6615814 | Rice et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6644296 | Gardner, Jr. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6748938 | Rice et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763822 | Styles | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785996 | Danner et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6941693 | Rice et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6948487 | Rice et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6966313 | Yokota et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1179898 | Jul 1989 | JP |
3207998 | Sep 1991 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050155589 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60534563 | Jan 2004 | US |