The use of radiation therapy to treat cancer is well known. Typically, radiation therapy involves directing a beam of high energy proton, photon, ion, or electron radiation (“therapeutic radiation”) into a target or target volume (e.g., a tumor or lesion) in a patient.
Before a patient is treated with radiation, a treatment plan specific to that patient is developed. The plan defines various aspects of the therapy using simulations and optimizations based on past experiences. In general, the purpose of the treatment plan is to deliver sufficient radiation to the target while minimizing exposure of surrounding normal, healthy tissue to the radiation.
The planner's goal is to find a solution that is optimal with respect to multiple clinical goals that may be contradictory in the sense that an improvement toward one goal may have a detrimental effect on reaching another goal. For example, a treatment plan that spares the liver from receiving a dose of radiation may result in the stomach receiving too much radiation. These types of tradeoffs lead to an iterative process in which the planner creates different plans to find the one plan that is best suited to achieving the desired outcome.
A recent radiobiology study has demonstrated the effectiveness of delivering an entire, relatively high therapeutic radiation dose to a target within a single, short period of time. This type of treatment is referred to generally herein as FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH RT). Evidence to date suggests that FLASH RT advantageously spares normal, healthy tissue from damage when that tissue is exposed to only a single irradiation for only a very short period of time. FLASH RT thus introduces important constraints that are not considered in or achieved with conventional radiation treatment planning.
Typically for radiation therapy treatment, a patient first receives a CT (computed tomography) scan used to simulate the patient's treatment. A simulated treatment plan defines beam orientations and corresponding particle fluences to generate a 3D (three-dimensional) dose distribution that best achieves the physician's prescription and/or intent. Once the treatment plan has been defined, treatment can commence. It is noted that treatment uncertainties result from differences in the patient appearance at each treatment fraction compared to the CT simulation from which the treatment plan was derived. In addition, organ motion related to gross patient movement, breathing, heart function, and variable organ filling further compounds the treatment uncertainty. Various techniques are currently employed to manage organ motion in order to minimize the difference between the planned and delivered dose to the patient, including: breath holding, treatment gating, or abdominal compression. Each of these techniques has associated benefits and drawbacks, but all are designed to manage motion when treatment delivery time is over several minutes and may last as long as 60 minutes.
For example, one of the disadvantages of breath holding is that many patients do not have lung function to hold their breath for more than a few seconds; therefore, precluding them from holding their breath for the duration of an entire treatment field. It is noted that one of the disadvantages associated with treatment gating is that it requires continuous monitoring of the patient during relatively lengthy treatments, and turning the treatment beam off whenever the target volume moves outside of a predetermined volume of interest. Furthermore, treatment gating may increase the treatment time considerably, because the treatment beam may be held off for large periods of the breathing cycle. Note that abdominal compression is often poorly tolerated by most patients, as it places patients in a great deal of discomfort and can limit critical functions associated with normal organ motion, such as breathing or bowel motion.
Various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure can address the disadvantages described above.
In various embodiments, the present disclosure provides a triggered treatment which is a new paradigm of Image Guided Radiation Therapy that nearly eliminates organ motion during radiation delivery. In various embodiments, by delivering the entire treatment from each beam in a flash lasting a short period of time (e.g., a fraction of a second), target and organ motion is relatively “frozen” in 3D (three-dimensional) space and treatment uncertainty caused by motion is minimized. A method in accordance with various embodiments involves monitoring motion of the target volume of a patient before treatment, and selecting the appropriate time to trigger the flash of treatment. For each beam orientation, a region of interest can be monitored in real-time fluoroscopic projections through the patient. A single or multiple simultaneous fluoroscopic images can localize the target in three dimensions as it moves within the patient. When the target position matches its location within a pre-treatment simulation (e.g., CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), or any medical imaging), the triggered treatment can be delivered precisely to the target in a nearly instantaneous flash.
In various embodiments, the triggered treatment of the present disclosure can include monitoring patient motion in real-time using fluoroscopic imaging (or alternate methods), which allows the patient to breathe freely or to hold their breath if indicated. In addition, this preserves patient comfort, ultimately making the patient experience more positive. Furthermore, it is noted that treatment margins that account for motion uncertainty can be markedly reduced due to the ultra-short triggered treatment flash, meaning that substantially less healthy tissue is irradiated, which should result in less side-effects and late toxicities resulting from the treatment.
In various embodiments, the triggered treatment of the present disclosure can include monitoring the patient surface continuously and triggering a sequence of radiographic images to be acquired to confirm the position of the target before triggering the treatment.
In various embodiments, the triggered treatment of the present disclosure can include any method of continuously tracking patient motion and/or breathing combined with some form of visualizing internal anatomy, fiducial markers, or surrogates of internal anatomy.
In various embodiments, the triggered treatment of the present disclosure can be implemented with any particle or wave radiation delivered at FLASH dose rates (e.g., greater than 40 Gy (grays)/second), but is not limited to such.
In various embodiments, in accordance with the present disclosure, it is noted that fluoroscopy (e.g., ionizing radiation) dose can be used with standard dose rates to reconstruct dose for inter-fractional dose tracking.
In various embodiments, a radiation therapy method can include loading a planning image of a target in a human. In addition, a four-dimensional (4D) real-time video image can be generated of the target. A computation can be made of an occurrence of substantial alignment between the target of the 4D real-time video image and the target of the planning image. Furthermore, after the computing, a beam of radiation is triggered to deliver a dosage to the target in a short period of time (e.g., less than a second).
In various embodiments, a radiation therapy method can include loading a planning image of a target in a human. Moreover, a 4D real-time video image can be generated of the target. A mapping can be performed of the target in both the 4D real-time video image and the planning image. A computation can be made of an occurrence of substantial alignment between the target of the 4D real-time video image and the target of the planning image. Additionally, after the computing, a beam of radiation is triggered to deliver a fraction of a dosage to the target in a short period of time (e.g., less than a second).
In various embodiments, a radiation therapy method can include loading a planning image of a target in a human. A 4D real-time video image can be generated of the target. In addition, a computation can be made of an occurrence of substantial alignment between the target of the 4D real-time video image and the target of the planning image. After the computing, a beam of radiation is triggered to deliver a dosage to the target in a short period of time (e.g., less than a second). Moreover, after the triggering, quality assurance is performed utilizing imaging information associated with the 4D real-time video image.
In various embodiments, a radiation therapy method can include loading a planning image of a target in a human. In addition, the position of the target can be monitored. A computation can be made of an occurrence of substantial alignment between the position of the target and the target of the planning image. Furthermore, after the computing, a beam of radiation is triggered to deliver a dosage to the target in less than a second.
In various embodiments, a radiation therapy method can include loading a planning image of a target in a human. Moreover, the position of the target can be monitored. A mapping can be performed of the target in both the monitoring and the planning image. A computation can be made of an occurrence of substantial alignment between the position of the target and the target of the planning image. Additionally, after the computing, a beam of radiation is triggered to deliver a fraction of a dosage to the target in less than a second.
In various embodiments, a radiation therapy method can include loading a planning image of a target in a human. The position of the target can be monitored. In addition, a computation can be made of an occurrence of substantial alignment between the position of the target and the target of the planning image. After the computing, a beam of radiation is triggered to deliver a dosage to the target in less than a second. Moreover, after the triggering, quality assurance is performed utilizing information associated with the monitoring.
While various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure have been specifically described within this Summary, it is noted that the claimed subject matter are not limited in any way by these various embodiments.
Within the accompanying drawings, various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation. It is noted that like reference numerals denote similar elements throughout the drawings.
Reference will now be made in detail to various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While described in conjunction with various embodiments, it will be understood that these various embodiments are not intended to limit the present disclosure. On the contrary, the present disclosure is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the scope of the present disclosure as construed according to the Claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. However, it will be evident to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present disclosure may be practiced without these specific details or with equivalents thereof. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present disclosure.
Some portions of the detailed descriptions that follow are presented in terms of procedures, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. In the present application, a procedure, logic block, process, or the like, is conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps are those utilizing physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, although not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computing system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as transactions, bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, samples, pixels, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present disclosure, discussions utilizing terms such as “determining,” “accessing,” “directing,” “controlling,” “defining,” “arranging,” “generating,” “acquiring,” “triggering”, “computing”, “loading” or the like, refer to actions and processes of a computing system or similar electronic computing device or processor (e.g., the computing system 100 of
Portions of the detailed description that follows are presented and discussed in terms of a method. Although steps and sequencing thereof are disclosed in figures herein describing the operations of this method, such steps and sequencing are exemplary. Any method is well suited to performing various other steps or variations of the steps recited in the flowchart of the figure herein, and in a sequence other than that depicted and described herein.
Various embodiments described herein may be discussed in the general context of computer-executable instructions residing on some form of computer-readable storage medium, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable storage media may comprise non-transitory computer storage media and communication media. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments.
Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disk ROM (CD-ROM), digital versatile disks (DVDs) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to store the desired information and that can be accessed to retrieve that information.
Communication media can embody computer-executable instructions, data structures, and program modules, and includes any information delivery media. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency (RF), infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of any of the above can also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
The system 100 also includes input device(s) 124 such as keyboard, mouse, pen, voice input device, touch input device, etc. Output device(s) 126 such as a display device, speakers, printer, etc., are also included.
In the example of
It is noted that the computing system 100 may not include all of the elements illustrated by
In the example of
Note that the system 200 may not include all of the elements illustrated by
The treatment planning tool set 310 searches through the knowledge base 302 (through the patient records 304) for prior patient records that are similar to the current patient record 312. The statistical models 308 can be used to compare the predicted results for the current patient record 312 to a statistical patient. Using the current patient record 312, a selected treatment type 306, and selected statistical models 308, the tool set 310 generates a radiation treatment plan 322.
More specifically, in
In various embodiments according to the present disclosure, the optimizer model 150 uses a dose prediction model to help shape the dose distribution. The optimizer model 150 can provide, for example, a 3D dose distribution, fluences, and associated dose-volume histograms for the current patient.
It is pointed out that the system 300 may not include all of the elements illustrated by
The accelerator and beam transport system 404 generates and accelerates a beam of charged particles, such as electrons, protons, and ions (e.g., heavy ions), and contains the particles in a well-defined beam. In various embodiments, the accelerator is an isochronous cyclotron capable of continuous wave output. The accelerator (e.g., the cyclotron) extracts particles with a specified energy. This provides a high, continuous wave beam current for the high dose rate per shot. Other types of radio frequency accelerators can be used, such as a pulsed proton accelerator such as a synchrocyclotron, a synchrotron, a coupled cavity linear accelerator in addition to non-radio frequency accelerators, such as constant field, and laser-based accelerators. The accelerator (e.g., cyclotron) can be a lower power output cyclotron, such as a cyclotron that accelerates particles to the range of 70-300 million electron volts (MeVs).
Within
In various embodiments, it is noted that the accelerator and beam transport system 404 of the therapy system 400 can be implemented to produce any type of particle beam. For example, in various embodiments, the accelerator and beam transport system 404 can be implemented to produce any type of charged particle beam or non-charged particle beam. It is noted that in various embodiments the accelerator and beam transport system 404 can produce a particle beam of, but not limited to, electrons, protons, photons, carbon, carbon ions, neutrons, helium, alpha particles, oxygen, helium nuclei, or X-rays. In addition, in various embodiments, the accelerator and beam transport system 404 can be implemented to produce an ultra-sound output.
The nozzle 406 is used to aim the beam toward various locations (a target) within an object (e.g., a patient) supported on the patient support device 408 (e.g., a chair or table) in a treatment room. A target may be an organ, a portion of an organ (e.g., a volume or region within the organ), a tumor, diseased tissue, or a patient outline. In various embodiments, the nozzle 406 also includes components (e.g., X-Y scanning magnets) that steer (e.g., guide, deflect, or scan) the beam particles in the X and Y directions, to scan a target in a patient on the patient support device 408.
Within
The control system 410 of
As noted above, the particles entering the nozzle 406 have a specified energy. Thus, in various embodiments according to the present disclosure, the nozzle 406 includes one or more components that affect (e.g., decrease, modulate) the energy, intensity, or both energy and intensity of the particles in the beam. The term “beam modulator” is used herein as a general term for a component or components that affect the energy, intensity, or both energy and intensity of the particles in the beam, in order to control the range of the beam (e.g., the extent that the beam penetrates into a target) and/or to control the depth dose curve of the beam (e.g., the location of the maximal dose value in the target). In various embodiments, the beam modulator 407 includes a range modulator, a range shifter, an intensity modulator, or any combination thereof (e.g., a range modulator and a range shifter, a range and intensity modulator, etc.). That is, when the term “beam modulator” is used, then the element being discussed may be a range modulator, an intensity modulator, a range shifter, or both a range modulator and a range shifter, or a range and intensity modulator, or intensity modulator, or intensity modulator and range shifter. Examples of beam modulators are disclosed in the co-pending patent application, U.S. Application Ser. No. 15/089,330, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,855,445, entitled “Radiation Therapy Systems and Methods for Delivering Doses to a Target Volume”; however, the present disclosure is not so limited.
Note that the system 400 may not include all of the elements illustrated by
At operation 502, simulate a patient's treatment. Note that operation 502 can be implemented in a wide variety of ways. For example, in various embodiments, operation 502 can include the patient receiving a scan (e.g., CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), or other medical imaging) of one or more target volumes used to simulate the patient's treatment. In various embodiments, the scan(s) at operation 502 can be referred to as a planning image(s) and can be loaded into one or more computing system memory devices. It is noted that operation 502 can be implemented in any manner similar to that described and/or shown by the present disclosure, but is not limited to such.
At operation 504 of
At operation 506, an image (e.g., static or non-static) is loaded of at least one target volume of the patient. Note that operation 506 can be implemented in a wide variety of ways. For example, the image can be loaded at operation 506 by utilizing a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan, an MRI scan, or any other medical imaging scan of the patient, but is not limited to such. Operation 506 can be implemented in any manner similar to that described and/or shown by the present disclosure, but is not limited to such.
At operation 508 of
At operation 510, treatment of the patient begins with real-time fluoroscopic imaging. Note that operation 510 can be implemented in a wide variety of ways. For example, a four dimensional (4D) cone beam can be generated at operation 510 thereby resulting in a real-time video feed. It is noted that operation 510 can be implemented in any manner similar to that described and/or shown by the present disclosure, but is not limited to such.
At operation 512 of
It is noted that operation 512 can be implemented in a wide variety of ways. For example, at operation 512, a manual monitoring can be implemented by a human (e.g., a therapist) that is trained to watch the real-time video imaging of the patient and determine when the target volume substantially aligns (e.g., within a range of deviation) with the intended target volume from the planning image (e.g., CT, MRI, or other medical imaging). In various embodiments, at operation 512, an automatic monitoring can be included using a computing system (e.g., 100) wherein one or more metrics are defined in order to compute when the target volume substantially aligns (e.g., within a range of deviation) with the intended target volume from the planning image (e.g., CT, MRI, or other medical imaging).
In various embodiments, operation 512 of
It is noted that the visual representation 600 in various embodiments can include a deformation vector-field images 602 and a bar graph 606. The visual representation 600 can be generated by doing a deformable image registration where each voxel of the real-time video imaging will be mapped to a voxel in the planning image and that voxel mapping can be represented by deformation vector-fields 604 as shown in the vector-field images 602. It is pointed out that where there is a lot of change from one image to the other is represented by long arrows or vectors 604 and where there is not so much is represented by small arrows 604. Therefore, when the lengths of the arrows 604 get minimized within a region of interest (e.g., target volume), the treatment beam can be triggered (e.g., at operation 514). In addition, in various embodiments, the arrows 604 can be color coded where lighter colors indicate areas of higher deformation between the images while darker colors indicate areas of less deformation, but is not limited to such.
Within
Note that the visual representation 600 may not include all of the elements illustrated by
Within
At operation 514, a treatment is triggered which can include, but is not limited to, delivering a dose of radiation therapy (or ultrasound, etc.) to the target volume within a fraction of a second (e.g., less than a second). Note that operation 514 can be implemented in a wide variety of ways. For example, at operation 514, the entire treatment dosage of radiation therapy can be delivered to the target volume within a fraction of a second. In various embodiments, at operation 514, a fraction of the treatment dosage of radiation therapy can be delivered to the target volume within a fraction of a second. In various embodiments, at operation 514, each beam can deliver a relatively high dose in a relatively short period of time. For example, each beam can deliver, but is not limited to, at least 0.01 grays (Gy) or 4 Gy in less than one second, and may deliver as much as 20 Gy or 500 Gy or more in less than one second (sec). In various embodiments, at operation 514, each beam can deliver, but is not limited to, greater than 4 Gy/sec, greater than 20 Gy/sec, or greater than 40 Gy/sec. In various embodiments, at operation 514, each beam can deliver, but is not limited to, at least 1 Gy in 0.25 sec, at least 1 Gy in 0.05 sec, or at least 1 Gy in 0.025 sec. It is noted that operation 514 can be implemented in any manner similar to that described and/or shown by the present disclosure, but is not limited to such.
At operation 516 of
At operation 518, a computation can be made as to whether the treatment has been completed. If so, method 500 can proceed to operation 522. However, if it is computed at operation 518 that the treatment has not been completed, method 500 can proceed to operation 520. Note that operation 518 can be implemented in a wide variety of ways. For example, operation 518 can be implemented in any manner similar to that described and/or shown by the present disclosure, but is not limited to such.
At operation 520 of
At operation 522, an offline (or after treatment) triggered treatment quality assurance can be performed. Note that operation 522 can be implemented in a wide variety of ways. For example, by acquiring the fluoroscopy after treatment at operation 522, the 4D imaging information can be matched to the 4D beam-time, lending itself to a 4D dose calculation. In various embodiments, this calculation can be summed for offline quality assurance (QA) at operation 522 allowing for 4D dose tracking for each fraction in the course of treatment. In various embodiments, at operation 522 the offline triggered treatment quality assurance can include checking, making sure, and redelivering (or replaying) the dose computationally on the 4D image with the actual log files from the machine and verify the dose that was done. It is pointed out that this utilization of fluoroscopy for 4D dose tracking may be useful for standard radiation delivery schemes and dose-rates. It is noted that operation 522 can be implemented in any manner similar to that described and/or shown by the present disclosure, but is not limited to such. After the completion of operation 522, method 500 can be ended. In this manner, method 500 can perform triggered radiation therapy treatment in accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure.
In various embodiments, note that the operations 502, 504, 506, and 508 of
At operation 702 of
At operation 704, a computation can be made (e.g., manually or automatically) as to whether the real-time position of the at least one target volume substantially aligns with the position of the corresponding at least one target volume of the planning image. If so, method 700 can proceed to operation 706. However, if at operation 704 it is computed that the real-time position of the at least one target volume does not substantially align with the corresponding at least one target volume of the planning image, method 700 can proceed to the beginning of operation 704.
It is noted that operation 704 can be implemented in a wide variety of ways. For example, at operation 704, a manual monitoring can be implemented by a human (e.g., a therapist) that is trained to watch the real-time position of the at least one target volume and determine when it substantially aligns (e.g., within a range of deviation) with the corresponding at least one target volume from the planning image (e.g., CT, MRI, or other medical imaging). In various embodiments, at operation 704, an automatic monitoring can be included using a computing system (e.g., 100) wherein one or more metrics are defined in order to compute when the real-time position of the at least one target volume substantially aligns (e.g., within a range of deviation) with the corresponding at least one target volume from the planning image (e.g., CT, MRI, or other medical imaging).
In various embodiments, operation 704 of
At operation 706, a treatment is triggered which can include, but is not limited to, delivering a dose of radiation therapy (or ultrasound, etc.) to the at least one target volume within a fraction of a second (e.g., less than a second). Note that operation 706 can be implemented in a wide variety of ways. For example, at operation 706, the entire treatment dosage of radiation therapy can be delivered to the at least one target volume within less than a second. In various embodiments, at operation 706, a fraction of the treatment dosage of radiation therapy can be delivered to the target volume within less than a second. In various embodiments, at operation 706, each beam can deliver a relatively high dose in a relatively short period of time. For example, each beam can deliver, but is not limited to, at least 0.01 Gy or 4 Gy in less than one second, and may deliver as much as 20 Gy or 500 Gy or more in less than one second (sec). In various embodiments, at operation 706, each beam can deliver, but is not limited to, greater than 4 Gy/sec, greater than 20 Gy/sec, or greater than 40 Gy/sec. In various embodiments, at operation 706, each beam can deliver, but is not limited to, at least 1 Gy in 0.25 sec, at least 1 Gy in 0.05 sec, or at least 1 Gy in 0.025 sec. It is noted that operation 706 can be implemented in any manner similar to that described and/or shown by the present disclosure, but is not limited to such.
At operation 708 of
At operation 710, a computation can be made as to whether the treatment has been completed. If so, method 700 can proceed to operation 714. However, if it is computed at operation 710 that the treatment has not been completed, method 700 can proceed to operation 712. Note that operation 710 can be implemented in a wide variety of ways. For example, operation 710 can be implemented in any manner similar to that described and/or shown by the present disclosure, but is not limited to such.
At operation 712 of
At operation 714, an offline (or after treatment) triggered treatment quality assurance can be performed. Note that operation 714 can be implemented in a wide variety of ways. For example, by acquiring the data (or information) of the real-time position monitoring of the at least one target volume after treatment at operation 714, it can be matched to the 4D beam-time, lending itself to a 4D dose calculation. In various embodiments, this calculation can be summed for offline quality assurance (QA) at operation 714 allowing for 4D dose tracking for each fraction in the course of treatment. In various embodiments, at operation 714 the offline triggered treatment quality assurance can include checking, making sure, and redelivering (or replaying) the dose computationally on a 4D image (for example) with the actual log files from the machine and verify the dose that was done. It is pointed out that in various embodiments, this utilization of fluoroscopy (or other position monitoring technique) for 4D dose tracking may be useful for standard radiation delivery schemes and dose-rates. It is noted that operation 714 can be implemented in any manner similar to that described and/or shown by the present disclosure, but is not limited to such. After the completion of operation 714, method 700 can be ended. In this manner, method 700 can perform triggered treatment (e.g., radiation therapy, ultrasound, etc.) in accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure.
The foregoing descriptions of various specific embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present disclosure to the precise forms disclosed, and many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The present disclosure is to be construed according to the Claims and their equivalents.
This is a continuation application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/237,502, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,898,730, entitled “Triggered Treatment Systems and Methods”, by Christel Smith et al., filed Dec. 31, 2018, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/657,072, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,183,179, entitled “Triggered Treatment Systems and Methods”, by Christel Smith et al., filed Jul. 21, 2017, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4163901 | Azam et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4914681 | Klingenbeck et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5142559 | Wielopolski | Aug 1992 | A |
5153900 | Nomikos et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5267294 | Kuroda et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5550378 | Skillicorn et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5610967 | Moorman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5625663 | Swerdloff et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5682412 | Skillicorn et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5757885 | Yao et al. | May 1998 | A |
6198802 | Elliott et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222544 | Tarr et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234671 | Solomon et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6260005 | Yang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6379380 | Satz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411675 | Llacer | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6445766 | Whitham | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6504899 | Pugachev et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6580940 | Gutman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6993112 | Hesse | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7268358 | Ma et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7453983 | Schildkraut et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7515681 | Ebstein | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522706 | Lu et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7560715 | Pedroni | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7590219 | Maurer, Jr. et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7616735 | Maciunas et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623623 | Raanes et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7778691 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7807982 | Nishiuchi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831289 | Riker et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7835492 | Sahadevan | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7907699 | Long et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8284898 | Ho et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306184 | Chang et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8401148 | Lu et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8406844 | Ruchala et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8559596 | Thomson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8600003 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8613694 | Walsh | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8636636 | Shukla et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8644571 | Schulte et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8716663 | Brusasco et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8836332 | Shvartsman et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8847179 | Fujitaka et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8903471 | Heid | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8917813 | Maurer, Jr. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8948341 | Beckman | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8958864 | Amies et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8983573 | Carlone et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8986186 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8992404 | Graf et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8995608 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9018603 | Loo et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9033859 | Fieres et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9079027 | Agano et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9149656 | Tanabe | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9155908 | Meltsner et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9233260 | Slatkin et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9258876 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9283406 | Prieels | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9308391 | Liu et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9330879 | Lewellen et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9333374 | Iwata | May 2016 | B2 |
9468777 | Fallone et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9517358 | Velthuis et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9526918 | Kruip | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9545444 | Strober et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9583302 | Figueroa Saavedra et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9636381 | Basile | May 2017 | B2 |
9636525 | Sahadevan | May 2017 | B1 |
9649298 | Djonov et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9656098 | Goer | May 2017 | B2 |
9694204 | Hardemark | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9776017 | Flynn et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9786054 | Taguchi et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9786093 | Svensson | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9786465 | Li et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9795806 | Matsuzaki et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9801594 | Boyd et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9844358 | Wiggers et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9854662 | Mishin | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9884206 | Schulte et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9931522 | Bharadwaj et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9962562 | Fahrig et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9974977 | Lachaine et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9987502 | Gattiker et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10007961 | Grudzinski et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10022564 | Thieme et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10071264 | Liger | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10080912 | Kwak et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10092774 | Vanderstraten et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10183179 | Smith et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10188875 | Kwak et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10206871 | Lin et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10212800 | Agustsson et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10232193 | Iseki | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10258810 | Zwart et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10272264 | Ollila et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10279196 | West et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10293184 | Pishdad et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10307614 | Schnarr | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10307615 | Ollila et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10315047 | Glimelius et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10413755 | Sahadevan | Sep 2019 | B1 |
10449389 | Ollila et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10485988 | Kuusela et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10525285 | Friedman | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10549117 | Vanderstraten et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10603514 | Grittani et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10609806 | Roecken et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10636609 | Bertsche et al. | Apr 2020 | B1 |
10660588 | Boyd et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10661100 | Shen | May 2020 | B2 |
10682528 | Ansorge et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10702716 | Heese | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10758746 | Kwak et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10870018 | Bartkoski et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20050020917 | Scherch | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060193435 | Hara et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070205373 | Kornblau et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070287878 | Fantini et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023644 | Pedroni | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090063110 | Failla et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090287467 | Sparks et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100119032 | Yan et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100177870 | Nord et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100178245 | Arnsdorf et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100260317 | Chang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110006224 | Maltz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110091015 | Yu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110135058 | Sgouros et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120076271 | Yan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120157746 | Meltsner et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120171745 | Itoh | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197058 | Shukla et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130116929 | Carlton et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150922 | Butson et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130177641 | Ghoroghchian | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130231516 | Loo et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140177807 | Lewellen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185776 | Li et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140206926 | van der Laarse | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140275706 | Dean et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140369476 | Harding | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150011817 | Feng | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150202464 | Brand et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150231411 | O'Neal, III et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150306423 | Bharat et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160279444 | Schlosser | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160310764 | Bharadwaj et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170189721 | Sumanaweera et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170203129 | Dessy | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170281973 | Allen et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180021594 | Papp et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180043183 | Sheng et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180056090 | Jordan et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180099154 | Prieels | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180099155 | Prieels et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180099159 | Forton et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180154183 | Sahadevan | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180197303 | Jordan et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180207425 | Carlton et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180236268 | Zwart et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190022407 | Abel et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190022422 | Trail et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190054315 | Isola et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190070435 | Joe Anto et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190168027 | Smith et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190255361 | Mansfield | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190299027 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190299029 | Inoue | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190351259 | Lee et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200001118 | Snider, III et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200022248 | Yi et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200030633 | Van Heteren et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035438 | Star-Lack et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200069818 | Jaskula-Ranga et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200164224 | Vanderstraten et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200178890 | Otto | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200197730 | Safavi-Naeini et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200254279 | Ohishi | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200269068 | Abel et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200276456 | Swerdloff | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200282234 | Folkerts et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101282760 | Oct 2008 | CN |
104001270 | Aug 2014 | CN |
106730407 | May 2017 | CN |
107362464 | Nov 2017 | CN |
109966662 | Jul 2019 | CN |
105169572 | May 2020 | CN |
111481840 | Aug 2020 | CN |
111481841 | Aug 2020 | CN |
010207 | Jun 2008 | EA |
0979656 | Feb 2000 | EP |
3338858 | Jun 2018 | EP |
3384961 | Oct 2018 | EP |
3421087 | Jan 2019 | EP |
3453427 | Mar 2019 | EP |
3586920 | Jan 2020 | EP |
2617283 | Jun 1997 | JP |
2019097969 | Jun 2019 | JP |
20050059245 | Jun 2005 | KR |
2007017177 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2009042952 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2010018476 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO-2013038240 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013081218 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013133936 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2014139493 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015038832 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2015102680 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO-2016094284 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016122957 | Aug 2016 | WO |
2017156316 | Sep 2017 | WO |
2017174643 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2018137772 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2018152302 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2019097250 | May 2019 | WO |
2019103983 | May 2019 | WO |
2019164835 | Aug 2019 | WO |
2019166702 | Sep 2019 | WO |
2019185378 | Oct 2019 | WO |
2019222436 | Nov 2019 | WO |
2020018904 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020064832 | Apr 2020 | WO |
2020107121 | Jun 2020 | WO |
2020159360 | Aug 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
M. McManus et al., “The challenge of ionisation chamber dosimetry in ultra-short pulsed high dose-rate Very High Energy Electron beams,” Sci Rep 10, 9089 (2020), published Jun. 3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-020-65819-y. |
Ibrahim Oraiqat et al., “An Ionizing Radiation Acoustic Imaging (iRAI) Technique for Real-Time Dosimetric Measurements for FLASH Radiotherapy,” Medical Physics, vol. 47, Issue10, Oct. 2020, pp. 5090-5101, First published: Jun. 27, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14358. |
K. Petersson et al., “Dosimetry of ultra high dose rate irradiation for studies on the biological effect induced in normal brain and GBM,” ICTR-PHR 2016, p. S84, Feb. 2016, https://publisher-connector.core.ac.uk/resourcesync/data/elsevier/pdf/14c/aHR0cDovL2FwaS5lbHNIdmllci5jb20vY29udGVudC9hcnRpY2xIL3BpaS9zMDE2NzgxNDAxNjMwMTcyNA==pdf. |
Susanne Auer et al., “Survival of tumor cells after proton irradiation with ultra-high dose rates,” Radiation Oncology 2011, 6:139, Published Oct. 18, 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-139. |
Cynthia E. Keen, “Clinical linear accelerator delivers FLASH radiotherapy,” Physics World, Apr. 23, 2019, IOP Publishing Ltd, https://physicsworld.com/a/clinical-linear-accelerator-delivers-flash-radiotherapy/. |
Fan et al., “Emission guided radiation therapy for lung and prostate cancers: A feasibility study on a digital patient,” Med Phys. Nov. 2012; 39(11): 7140-7152. Published online Nov. 5, 2012. https://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505203/ doi: 10.1118/1.4761951. |
Favaudon et al., “Ultrahigh dose-rate, “flash” irradiation minimizes the side-effects of radiotherapy,” Cancer/Radiotherapy, vol. 19, Issues 6-7 , Oct. 2015 , pp. 526-531, Available online Aug. 12, 2015, https://doi .org/10.1016/j.canrad.2015.04.006. |
O. Zlobinskaya et al., “The Effects of Ultra-High Dose Rate Proton Irradiation on Growth Delay in the Treatment of Human Tumor Xenografts in Nude Mice,” Radiation Research, 181(2):177-183. Published Feb. 13, 2014, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR13464.1. |
Bjorn Zackrisson, “Biological Effects Of High Energy Radiation And Ultra High Dose Rates,” UMEA University Medical Dissertations, New series No. 315—ISSN 0346-6612, From the Department of Oncology, University of Umea, Umea, Sweden, ISBN 91-7174-614-5, Printed in Sweden by the Printing Office of Umea University, Umea, 1991. |
P. Montay-Gruel et al., “Irradiation in a flash: Unique sparing of memory in mice after whole brain irradiation with Jose rates above 100 Gy/s,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 124, Issue 3, Sep. 2017, pp. 365-369, Available online May 22, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.05.003. |
BW Loo et al., “Delivery of Ultra-Rapid Flash Radiation Therapy and Demonstration of Normal Tissue Sparing After Abdominal Irradiation of Mice,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 98, Issue 2, p. E16, Supplement: S Meeting Abstract: P003, Published: Jun. 1, 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.101. |
Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu et al., “Ultra high dose rate (35 Gy/sec) radiation does not spare the normal tissue in cardiac and splenic models of lymphopenia and gastrointestinal syndrome,” Sci Rep 9, 17180 (2019), Published Nov. 20, 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53562-y. |
P. Montay-Gruel et al., “Long-term neurocognitive benefits of FLASH radiotherapy driven by reduced reactive oxygen species,” PNAS May 28, 2019, vol. 116, No. 22, pp. 10943-10951; first published May 16, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901777116. |
Peter G. Maxim et al., “FLASH radiotherapy: Newsflash or flash in the pan?”, Medical Physics, 46 (10), Oct. 2019, pp. 4287-4290, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, First published: Jun. 27, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13685. |
Andrei Pugachev et al., “Pseudo beam's-eye-view as applied to beam orientation selection in intensity-modulated radiation therapy,” Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., vol. 51, Issue 5, p. 1361-1370, Dec. 1, 2001, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01736-9. |
Xiaodong Zhang et al., “Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Reduces the Dose to Normal Tissue Compared With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy or Passive Scattering Proton Therapy and Enables Individualized Radical Radiotherapy for Extensive Stage IIIB Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Virtual Clinical Study,” Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 357-366, 2010, Available online Aug. 5, 2009, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.028. |
A. J. Lomax et al., “Intensity modulated proton therapy: A clinical example,” Medical Physics, vol. 28, Issue 3, Mar. 2001, pp. 317-324, First published: Mar. 9, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1350587. |
Lamberto Widesott et al., “Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Helical Tomotherapy in Nasopharynx Dancer: Planning Comparison and NTCP Evaluation,” Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 589-596, Oct. 1, 2008, Available online Sep. 13, 2008, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.065. |
Andrei Pugachev et al., “Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy,” Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 551-560, Jun. 1, 2001, Available online May 10, 2001, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01502-4. |
Damien C. Weber et al., “Radiation therapy planning with photons and protons for early and advanced breast cancer: an overview,” Radiat Oncol. 2006; 1: 22. Published online Jul. 20, 2006, doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-1-22. |
RaySearch Laboratories, “Leading the way in cancer treatment, Annual Repod 2013,” RaySearch Laboratories (publ), Stockholm, Sweden, 94 pages, Apr. 2014, https://www.raysearchlabs.com/siteassets/about-overview/media-center/wp-re-ev-n-pdfs/brochures/raysearch-ar-2013-eng-pdf. |
Fredrik Carlsson, “Utilizing Problem Structure in Optimization of Radiation Therapy,” KTH Engineering Sciences, Doctoral Thesis, Stockholm, Sweden, Apr. 2008, Optimization and Systems Theory, Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, ISSN 1401-2294, https://www.raysearchlabs.com/globalassets/about-overview/media-center/wp-re-ev-n-pdfs/publications/thesis-fredrik_light.pdf. |
Chang-Ming Charlie Ma, “Physics and Dosimetric Principles of SRS and SBRT,” Mathews J Cancer Sci. 4(2): 22, 2019, published: Dec. 11, 2019, ISSN: 2474-6797, DOI: https://doi.org/10.30654/MJCS.10022. |
Alterego-Admin, “Conventional Radiation Therapy May Not Protect Healthy Brain Cells,” International Neuropsychiatric Association—INA, Oct. 10, 2019, https://inawebsite.org/conventional-radiation-therapy-may-not-protect-healthy-brain-cells/. |
Aafke Christine Kraan, “Range verification methods in particle therapy: underlying physics and Monte Carlo modeling,” Frontiers in Oncology, Jul. 7, 2015, vol. 5, Article 150, 27 pages, doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00150. |
Wayne D. Newhauser et al., “The physics of proton therapy,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, Mar. 24, 2015, 60 R155-R209, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, IOP Publishing, doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/8/R155. |
S E McGowan et al., “Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy,” Br J Radiol, 2013, 86, 20120288, The British Institute of Radiology, 12 pages, DOI: 10.1259.bjr.20120288. |
Steven Van De Water et al., “Towards FLASH proton therapy: the impact of treatment planning and machine characteristics on achievable dose rates,” Acta Oncologica, Jun. 26, 2019, vol. 58, No. 10, p. 1462-1469, Taylor & Francis Group, DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1627416. |
J. Groen, “Flash optimisation in clinical IMPT treatment planning,” MSc Thesis, Jul. 1, 2020, Erasmus University Medical Center, department of radiotherapy, Delft University of Technology, 72 pages. |
Muhammad Ramish Ashraf et al., “Dosimetry for FLASH Radiotherapy: A Review of Tools and the Role of Radioluminescence and Cherenkov Emission,” Frontiers in Oncology, Aug. 21, 2020, vol. 8, Article 328, 20 pages, doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00328. |
Emil Schuler et al., “Experimental Platform for Ultra-high Dose Rate FLASH Irradiation of Small Animals Using a Clinical Linear Accelerator,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 97, No. 1, Sep. 2016, pp. 195-203. |
Elette Engels et al., “Toward personalized synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy,” Scientific Reports, 10:8833, Jun. 1, 2020, 13 pages, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65729-z. |
P-H Mackeprang et al., “Assessing dose rate distributions in VMAT plans” (Accepted Version), Accepted Version: https://boris.unibe.ch/92814/8/dose_rate_project_revised_submit.pdf Published Version: 2016, Physics in medicine and biology, 61(8), pp. 3208-3221. Institute of Physics Publishing IOP, published Mar. 29, 2016, https://boris.unibe.ch/92814/. |
Xiaoying Liang et al., “Using Robust Optimization for Skin Flashing in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer Treatment: A Feasibility Study,” Practical Radiation Oncology, vol. 10, Issue 1, p. 59-69, Published by Elsevier Inc., Oct. 15, 2019. |
Alexei Trofimov et al., “Optimization of Beam Parameters and Treatment Planning for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy,” Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, vol. 2, No. 5, Oct. 2003, p. 437-444, Adenine Press. |
Vladimir Anferov, “Scan pattern optimization for uniform proton beam scanning,” Medical Physics, vol. 36, Issue 8, Aug. 2009, pp. 3560-3567, First published: Jul. 2, 2009. |
Ryosuke Kohno et al., “Development of Continuous Line Scanning System Prototype for Proton Beam Therapy,” International Journal of Particle Therapy, Jul. 11, 2017, vol. 3, Issue 4, p. 429-438, Doi: 10.14338/IJPT-16-00017.1. |
Wenbo Gu et al., “Integrated Beam Orientation and Scanning-Spot Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Brain and Unilateral Head and Neck Tumors,” Med Phys. Author manuscript; available in PMC Apr. 1, 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904040/ Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. Apr. 2018; 45(4): 1338-1350. Published online Mar. 1, 2018. doi: 10.1002/mp.12788 Accepted manuscript online: Feb. 2, 2018. |
Paul Morel et al., “Spot weight adaptation for moving target in spot scanning proton therapy,” Frontiers in Oncology, May 28, 2015, vol. 5, Article 119, 7 pages, doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00119. |
Simeon Nill et al., “Inverse planning of intensity modulated proton therapy,” Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik, vol. 14, Issue 1, 2004, pp. 35-40, https://doi.org/10.1078/0939-3889-00198. |
A. Lomax, “Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, Jan. 1999, vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 185-205, doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/1/014. |
M Kramer et al., “Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: physical beam model and dose optimization,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2000, vol. 45, No. 11, pp. 3299-3317, doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/313. |
Harald Paganetti, “Proton Beam Therapy,” Jan. 2017, Physics World Discovery, IOP Publishing Ltd, Bristol, UK, 34 pages, DOI: 10.1088/978-0-7503-1370-4. |
Shinichi Shimizu et al., “A Proton Beam Therapy System Dedicated to Spot-Scanning Increases Accuracy with Moving Tumors by Real-Time Imaging and Gating and Reduces Equipment Size,” PLoS ONE, Apr. 18, 2014, vol. 9, Issue 4, e94971, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094971. |
Heng Li et al., “Reducing Dose Uncertainty for Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy of Moving Tumors by Optimizing the Spot Delivery Sequence,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 93, Issue 3, Nov. 1, 2015, pp. 547-556, available online Jun. 18, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.06.019. |
Ion Beam Applications SA, “Netherlands Proton Therapy Center Delivers First Clinical Flash Irradiation,” Imaging Technology News, May 2, 2019, Wainscot Media, https://www.itnonline.com/content/netherlands-proton-therapy-center-delivers-first-clinical-flash-irradiation. |
R. M. De Kruijff, “Flash radiotherapy: ultra-high dose rates to spare healthy tissue,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, 2020, vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 419-423, published online: Dec. 19, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2020.1704912. |
Mevion Medical Systems, “Focus On The Future: Flash Therapy,” Press Releases, Sep. 16, 2019, https://www.mevion.com/newsroom/press-releases/focus-future-flash-therapy. |
Joseph D. Wilson et al., “Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold?”, Frontiers in Oncology, Jan. 17, 2020, vol. 9, Article 1563, 12 pages, doi: 10.3389/fonc 2019.01563. |
David P. Gierga, “Is Flash Radiotherapy coming?”, International Organization for Medical Physics, 2020, https://www.iomp.org/iomp-news2-flash-radiotherapy/. |
Abdullah Muhammad Zakaria et al., “Ultra-High Dose-Rate, Pulsed (FLASH) Radiotherapy with Carbon Ions: Generation of Early, Transient, Highly Oxygenated Conditions in the Tumor Environment,” Radiation Research, Dec. 1, 2020, vol. 194, Issue 6, pp. 587-593, Radiation Research Society, Published: Aug. 27, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-19-00015.1. |
Yusuke Demizu et al., “Carbon Ion Therapy for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 727962, 9 pages, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, published: Sep. 11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/727962. |
Ivana Dokic et al., “Next generation multi-scale biophysical characterization of high precision cancer particle adiotherapy using clinical proton, helium-, carbon- and oxygen ion beams,” Oncotarget, Aug. 30, 2016, vol. 7, No. 35, pp. 56676-56689, published online: Aug. 1, 2016, doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10996. |
Aetna Inc., “Proton Beam, Neutron Beam, and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy,” 2020, No. 0270, http://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/200_299/0270.html. |
Nicholas W. Colangelo et al., “The Importance and Clinical Implications of FLASH Ultra-High Dose-Rate Studies or Proton and Heavy Ion Radiotherapy,” Radiat Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jan. 1, 2021. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6949397/ Published in final edited form as: Radiat Res. Jan. 2020; 193(1): 1-4. Published online Oct 28, 2019. doi: 10.1667/RR15537.1. |
Vincent Favaudon et al., “Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice,” Science Translational Medicine, Jul. 16, 2014, vol. 6, Issue 245, 245ra93, American Association for the Advancement of Science, DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008973. |
“FlashRad: Ultra-high dose-rate FLASH radiotherapy to minimize the complications of radiotherapy,” 2014, https://siric.curie.fr/sites/default/files/atoms/files/flashrad.pdf. |
Tami Freeman, “FLASH radiotherapy: from preclinical promise to the first human treatment,” Physics World, Aug. 6, 2019, IOP Publishing Ltd, https://physicsworld.com/a/flash-radiotherapy-from-preclinical-promise-to-the-first-human-treatment/. |
IntraOp Medical, Inc., “IntraOp and Lausanne University Hospital Announce Collaboration in FLASH adiotherapy,” Jun. 18, 2020, https://intraop.com/news-events/lausanne-university-flash-radiotherapy-collaboration/. |
M.-C. Vozenin et al., “Biological Benefits of Ultra-high Dose Rate FLASH Radiotherapy: Sleeping Beauty Awoken,” Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). Author manuscript; available in PMC Nov. 12, 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850216/ Published in final edited form as: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). Jul. 2019; 31(7): 407-415. Published online Apr. 19, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.04.001. |
Efstathios Kamperis et al., “A FLASH back to radiotherapy's past and then fast forward to the future,” J Cancer Prev Curr Res. 2019;10(6):142-144. published Nov. 13, 2019, DOI: 10.15406/jcpcr.2019.10.00407. |
P. Symonds et al., “FLASH Radiotherapy: The Next Technological Advance in Radiation Therapy?”, Clinical Oncology, vol. 31, Issue 7, p. 405-406, Jul. 1, 2019, The Royal College of Radiologists, Published by Elsevier Ltd., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.011. |
Swati Girdhani et al., “Abstract LB-280: FLASH: A novel paradigm changing tumor irradiation platform that enhances therapeutic ratio by reducing normal tissue toxicity and activating immune pathways,” Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2019; Mar. 29-Apr. 3, 2019; Atlanta, GA, published Jul. 2019, vol. 79, Issue 13 Supplement, pp. LB-280, American Association for Cancer Research, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-LB-280. |
Bazalova-Carter et al., “On the capabilities of conventional x-ray tubes to deliver ultra-high (FLASH) dose rates,” Med. Phys. Dec. 2019; 46 (12):5690-5695, published Oct. 23, 2019, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, doi: 10.1002/mp.13858. Epub Oct. 23, 2019. PMID: 31600830. |
Manuela Buonanno et al., “Biological effects in normal cells exposed to FLASH dose rate protons,” Radiother Oncol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Oct. 1, 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6728238/ Published in final edited form as: Radiother Oncol. Oct. 2019; 139: 51-55. Published online Mar. 5, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.02.009. |
N. Rama et al., “Improved Tumor Control Through T-cell Infiltration Modulated by Ultra-High Dose Rate Proton FLASH Using a Clinical Pencil Beam Scanning Proton System,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 105, Issue 1, Supplement , S164-S165, Sep. 1, 2019, Mini Oral Sessions, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.187. |
Inserm Press Office, “Radiotherapy ‘flashes’ to reduce side effects,” Press Release, Jul. 16, 2014, https://presse.inserm.fr/en/radiotherapy-flashes-to-reduce-side-effects/13394/. |
Eric S. Diffenderfer et al., “Design, Implementation, and in Vivo Validation of a Novel Proton FLASH Radiation therapy System,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 106, Issue 2, Feb. 1, 2020, pp. 440-448, Available online Jan. 9, 2020, Published by Elsevier Inc., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.049. |
Valerie Devillaine, “Radiotherapy and Radiation Biology,” Institut Curie, Apr. 21, 2017, https://institut-curie.org/page/radiotherapy-and-radiation-biology. |
Imaging Technology News, “ProNova and medPhoton to Offer Next Generation Beam Delivery, Advanced Imaging for Proton Therapy,” Oct. 6, 2014, Wainscot Media, Link: https://www.itnonline.com/content/pronova-and-medphoton-offer-next-generation-beam-delivery-advanced-imaging-proton-therapy. |
Oncolink Team, “Radiation Therapy: Which type is right for me?”, OncoLink Penn Medicine, last reviewed Mar. 3, 2020, Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, https://www.oncolink.org/cancer-treatment/radiation/introduction-to-radiation-therapy/radiation-therapy-which-type-is-right-for-me. |
Marco Durante et al., “Faster and safer? FLASH ultra-high dose rate in radiotherapy,” Br J Radiol 2018; 91(1082): Jun. 28, 2017, British Institute of Radiology, Published Online: Dec. 15, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170628. |
John R. Fischer, “PMB launches FLASH radiotherapy system for use in clinical trials,” Healthcare Business News, Jun. 29, 2020, DOTmed.com, Inc., https://www.dotmed.com/news/story/51662. |
Marie-Catherine Vozenin et al., “The advantage of FLASH radiotherapy confirmed in mini-pig and cat-cancer patients,” Clinical Cancer Research, Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst Jun. 6, 2018, https://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/clincanres/early/2018/06/06/1078-0432.CCR-17-3375.full.pdf. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210113856 A1 | Apr 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16237502 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 17132966 | US | |
Parent | 15657072 | Jul 2017 | US |
Child | 16237502 | US |