Not Applicable
Not applicable.
This invention relates to the field of replacement insoles for shoes.
Shoes, particularly athletic shoes, generally have an insole placed within the foot-receiving compartment when sold. The insole is positioned so that the user's foot will rest thereon while wearing the shoe. Generally, such insoles are removable and may be replaced with insoles which may employ various features of benefit to the user or the particular needs of the user's feet.
A triple density gel insole is disclosed that advantageously absorbs shock and provides support to areas of the feet most subject to increased force or pressure during standing, walking or other activities. The insole comprises at least two coextensive layers adjacent one another and extending the length of the insole, a first top cloth layer and a second gel layer. The insole further comprises a stability cradle adjacent said gel layer, extending from the arch to the heel area and secured to the gel layer, said stability cradle defining a first metatarsal region gap which exposes the gel layer and a second heel region gap which exposes the gel layer. A heel cushion is positioned in the second heel region gap adjacent to and secured to said gel layer exposed in that region. A metatarsal arch support is preferably integrally formed in said first metatarsal region and appears as an indented area when viewed from the underside of the insole and a raised area (or convex bump) when viewed from the top of the insole. The metatarsal arch support is formed from the first top cloth and second gel layers as will be further detailed below. This metatarsal arch support functions to offload pressure on the metatarsal heads of the foot.
The first top cloth layer is made of sheet material in the shape of an insole or outline of a foot. Most preferably, a laminated fabric sheet having at least two layers is utilized. One of the layers of the laminated fabric sheet is preferably a non-woven fabric suitable as a barrier layer. The barrier layer prevents bleed-through of the gel component of the insole. It may also enhance or modify the desired color of the gel by employing a color that will provide the desired aesthetic quality. It has been found that a white fabric adjacent the gel will enhance the color of the gel. The fabric adjacent the gel layer in the assembled insole should also be able to form a good bond with the gel utilized.
The fabric or fabric layer which will lie adjacent the foot in use can be selected of any fabric which is capable of lamination with a barrier layer, or which can itself serve as a barrier layer if a single layer of fabric is employed. A preferred sheet material is a polyester fabric, but other fabrics such as brushed nylon and others may be used. Optionally, a fabric that reduces friction between the material and the person's foot may be employed. The fabric can be of any desired color.
Most preferably, an antimicrobial fabric is used, such as antimicrobial polyester. The antimicrobial fabric is preferred so that odor-causing bacteria will be inhibited. Fabrics having these properties are commercially available. One suitable fabric utilizes silver technology for antimicrobial purposes and is obtainable through Thompson Research Associates (Toronto, Canada) in fabrics employing SILPURE™ technology. In a preferred embodiment, fabric sold under the trade designation Ultra-Fresh Silpure FBR-5 is utilized, which provides control of bacterial growth even after extensive launderings. Other fabrics can be employed which use other types of antimicrobial technology, preferably long lasting action.
The second gel layer is preferably comprised of thermoplastic elastomer gel, also known as TPE gel. TPE gel is preferred over polyurethane (PU) gel for use in the invention due to its greater resiliency from its thermoplastic properties. TPE gel is desirable because it can set up in 20-30 seconds in a molding process, while other materials, for example PU gel can take minutes. If a material takes minutes to set up, it may not be suitable for injection molding in an efficient manner, but would necessitate different components of the insole to be molded in parts and then assembled. The material used for the second gel layer is preferably strong to allow the insole to be made relatively thin, but to remain strong. The thin nature of the insole is preferred to allow for greater foot space in shoes designed with lesser space in the foot cavity of the shoe, such as dress shoes. The insole is also, however, suitable for use in shoes with a larger foot cavity, such as athletic shoes.
There are various types of TPE gel, two of which are known as a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer (“TPU”) gel and thermoplastic rubber gel (“TPR”) gel. TPU gel may be selected if the color characteristics are of high importance, as it provides better color characteristics than TPR gel. In addition, TPU is more durable and easier to mold than TPR gel so it is desirable for use in making the invention if it is desired to impart these characteristics to the final product or to the process for making the insole. A disadvantage to TPU gel has heretofore been its higher cost as compared with other TPE gels such as TPR gel. TPR may also be used for the gel and has the necessary properties.
Other gels can be used, but it is preferred that the gel used have the characteristics described in the following paragraphs.
The preferred gel has a low compression set. Compression Set is defined as the amount of permanent set a sample displays after being compressed at a stated amount of percentage (%) at a specific temperature for a given amount of time and recovery period. In a preferred embodiment, the Compression Set is <11% for the gel layer. In order to select an appropriate gel for use in the invention, gel can be tested with a testing device used for the measurement of the compression set, or shock, in accordance with ASTM F1614-95, “Standard Test Method for Shock Attenuating Properties of Materials Systems for Athletic Footwear,” ASTM International For example, CompITS or Computerized Impact Testing System from Exeter Research is a standard machine that tests shock in compliance with ASTM F1614-95.
Tensile and Tear strengths: The preferred embodiment was found to have a tensile strength and tear strength of around 1.2 MPa and 12 kN/m for the gel layer.
Breaking Elongation Rate: The preferred embodiment was found to have a breaking elongation rate of 900% for the gel layer.
A Shore/Asker Hardness test provides a measure of hardness. In a most preferred embodiment, the gel layer measures 24 Asker C.
The Shore/Asker hardness is measured with a commercially available durometer. The material to be tested is placed on a hard flat surface. The Asker tester is equipped with a “C” scale and proper indentor type, typically a hemispherical type. The Asker tester is placed on the material to be tested with no additional pressure. The needle deflects to provide the reading.
The shoe surface of the gel layer is preferably provided with areas which exhibit advanced cushioning features. These areas are located in the areas of high impact of the heel and forefoot for the best benefit. A preferred embodiment incorporates honeycomb technology, by which a portion of the gel layer is molded into a honeycomb pattern. Honeycomb patterns have long been known to deflect force by temporarily deforming then returning to original configuration. See “Recovery Systems Guide”, Irvin Industries, 1978 (cited in Fisher, Aerobraking and Impact Attenuation, 1995).
The second gel layer, the heel cushion, and the cradle are preferably formed and secured to each other through a process of injection molding. Preferably, the molds used to make the insole have two-sided contour. This allows for quicker assembly so that the mold does not have to be changed during the injection molding process. The gel layer is molded on one side of the mold and the cradle and heel cushion is molded on the opposite side of the mold. Standard injection molding assembly-line processes are preferably utilized, but any molding process which results in the structure with the properties herein disclosed can be used are known in the art.
The stability cradle helps to support the longitudinal arch area of the foot on the medial side, control or eliminate pronation and control or eliminate supination on the lateral side of the foot. It is to be made of a material more rigid than the gel. Preferably, the stability cradle is made of TPR.
In a preferred embodiment, the Compression Set is <25% for the cradle. In order to select an appropriate gel for use in the invention, gel can be tested with a testing device used for the measurement of the compression set, or shock, in accordance with ASTM F1614-95, “Standard Test Method for Shock Attenuating Properties of Materials Systems for Athletic Footwear,” ASTM International. For example, CompITS or Computerized Impact Testing System from Exeter Research is a standard machine that tests shock in compliance with ASTM F1614-95.
Tensile and Tear strengths: The preferred embodiment was found to have a tensile strength and tear strength of around 6.3 MPa and 27 kN/m for the cradle.
Breaking Elongation Rate: The preferred embodiment was found to have a breaking elongation rate of 550% for cradle.
A Shore/Asker Hardness test provides a measure of hardness. In a most preferred embodiment, the cradle measures 70 Asker C.
The heel cushion is preferably made of a gel which provides added cushioning to the heel area of the foot of a user at heel strike. The gel composition of the heel cushion is preferably TPE. In one embodiment, the TPE is a TPR. The heel cushion gel is preferably a softer gel than that of the second gel layer.
In a preferred embodiment, the Compression Set is <11% for the heel pad. In order to select an appropriate gel for use in the invention, gel can be tested with a testing device used for the measurement of the compression set, or shock, in accordance with ASTM F1614-95, “Standard Test Method for Shock Attenuating Properties of Materials Systems for Athletic Footwear,” ASTM International. For example, CompITS or Computerized Impact Testing System from Exeter Research is a standard machine that tests shock in compliance with ASTM F1614-95.
Tensile and Tear strengths: The preferred embodiment was found to have a tensile strength and tear strength of around 1.0 MPa and 10.6 kN/m for the heel cushion.
Breaking Elongation Rate: The preferred embodiment was found to have a breaking elongation rate of 950% for the heel cushion.
A Shore/Asker Hardness test provides a measure of hardness. In a most preferred embodiment, the heel cushion measures 20 Asker C.
A preferred embodiment incorporates honeycomb technology in the heel cushion. A honeycomb pattern is cut into a mold and the gel molded to provide the desired shape.
The heel cushion in the preferred embodiment is shaped with a wide base designed to correspond with the fatty area of the heel and generally tapers to a U-shape corresponding with the heel opening defined by the stability cradle.
The total thickness and size of the insole can vary depending on the shoe size, the application, and whether the insole is a removable insole or a permanent insole. In an exemplary men's size 9, the total thickness was found to be between but not limited to about 0.138 inches near the toes to about 0.445 inches in the arch area. Other dimensions that were measured were the length which was found to be but not limited to 11.062 inches and the width which ranged from but is not limited to 2.41 inches near the heel and 3.812 near the metatarsal region. The height of the insole ranged from but is not limited to 0.138 inches near the toes to 0.726 inches near the heel. The length and width of the insole will vary according to the shoe size for which the insole is intended, but the thickness in the same relative area will be similar to the exemplary insole.
The preferred embodiment of the invention is a triple density multi-layer insole. The triple density of the insole provides the following advantages: stability, shock absorption and cushioning.
Still referring to
Still referring to
Heel cushion (4) is positioned in the cradle heel gap (32) and preferably incorporates honeycomb cushioning technology (41). This area provides advanced cushioning to heel when the user's weight is placed upon the heel of the foot during the heel strike operation in walking or running.
As shown in
As shown in
Also visible in
Preferably, the heel area, or back heel end (7) as shown in
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/076019 | 9/11/2008 | WO | 00 | 1/13/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/036173 | 3/19/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2090881 | Wilson | Aug 1937 | A |
2347207 | Margolin | Apr 1944 | A |
2553616 | Walls | May 1951 | A |
4020570 | Shames | May 1977 | A |
4694831 | Seltzer | Sep 1987 | A |
4864740 | Oakley | Sep 1989 | A |
4888887 | Solow | Dec 1989 | A |
5092060 | Frachey et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5155927 | Bates et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5197207 | Shorten | Mar 1993 | A |
5201125 | Shorten | Apr 1993 | A |
5369896 | Frachey et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5619809 | Sessa | Apr 1997 | A |
5685094 | Lin | Nov 1997 | A |
5727336 | Ogden | Mar 1998 | A |
5771606 | Litchfield et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6176025 | Patterson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192607 | Kolada et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6233847 | Brown | May 2001 | B1 |
6301805 | Howlett et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6502330 | David et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6631568 | Howlett et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6893453 | Agarwal et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6944974 | Falone et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6991691 | Yoon | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7047671 | Steed et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7082702 | Cretinon | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107705 | Dalton et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124520 | Galbraith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
D551437 | Hung et al. | Sep 2007 | S |
7644522 | Ramirez | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7665169 | Cheskin et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
D627958 | Cheskin et al. | Nov 2010 | S |
7908768 | Cheskin et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8015728 | Benfatti | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8069586 | Orvitz | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8186081 | Wilson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8250784 | Cheskin et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20020007569 | Crane et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020083618 | Erickson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030093920 | Greene et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030121180 | Poe | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040118017 | Dalton et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040194344 | Tadin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060000120 | Chenut et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060123664 | Boyd et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060230643 | Affleck | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060277797 | McLinden | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060277801 | Schwarze et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033834 | Cheskin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070084084 | Rich | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107261 | Cheskin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080115385 | McLinden | May 2008 | A1 |
20080271340 | Grisoni et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090151194 | Cheskin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100205831 | Cheskin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120047768 | Brave | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20-1993-0024801 | Dec 1993 | KR |
20-0427687 | Sep 2006 | KR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100205831 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60972540 | Sep 2007 | US |