The present invention pertains to the art of metal surface treatment, and more particularly, to conversion coatings for plated metals.
The invention is particularly suited to treatment or passivation of zinc-plated metal surfaces using a trivalent-chromium conversion coating and will be described with particular reference thereto. It will be appreciated, however, that the invention has broader applications such as treatment of other types of plated or non-plated substrates.
In the metal finishing industry, conversion coatings are used to provide metal surfaces with improved corrosion resistance. Conversion coatings also provide metal surfaces with improved adhesion for additional coatings such as paint or other finishes. Widely used conversion coatings use hexavalent chromate. Such chromate conversion coatings are applied at various thicknesses, ranging from a very thin “blue-bright” finish to a very thick olive-drab finish. “Blue-bright” finishes are transparent with a slight blue tint and high luster. Such a finish not only imparts a corrosion-resistant coating to the surface of a substrate but also aesthetically enhances the substrate and articles made therefrom. Heavier chromate conversion coatings are considerably more protective than the bright finishes, but they do not meet the aesthetic criteria that are characteristic of the bright coatings. These heavier coatings are well-recognized by their yellow, bronze, or olive-drab finishes which correspond in general order to increasing film thickness.
Although conversion-coating techniques using hexavalent chromium provide satisfactory results, hexavalent chromium can be toxic. Therefore, the waste from a hexavalent chromium based solution creates significant environmental concerns and hexavalent chromium baths require special treatment prior to disposal.
There are non-chrome treatments for forming passivation coatings, but these are generally unsatisfactory for enhancing the corrosion resistance of a plated substrate, particularly when the treated substrate is subjected to a humid environment. Such treatments typically include phosphate treatments and a bright dipping step, followed by a coating step using a transparent lacquer. Each step provides an additional barrier layer to corrosive conditions, but not a cohesive film forming a chemical bond between a film-forming element and the coated substrate as is achieved by hexavalent chromium processes. Accordingly, phosphate treatments provide barriers that are porous, permitting moisture to pass through to the coated substrate. Phosphate coatings are also not bright in appearance, but provide dull, opaque paint-like overcoats lacking the aesthetic attributes of hexavalent chromium conversion coatings.
Hexavalent chromium-free treatments have been developed utilizing trivalent chromium. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,349,392 is directed to an aqueous acidic solution and process for treating metal surfaces, comprising chromium ions substantially all of which are in the trivalent state, hydrogen ions to provide a pH of about 1.2 to about 2.5, an oxidizing agent, a bath soluble and compatible organic carboxylic acid or metal salts, and at least one additional metal ion.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,359,345 teaches an aqueous acidic solution and process for treating metal surfaces comprising chromium ions substantially all of which are in the trivalent stet, hydrogen ions to provide a pH of about 1.5 to 2.2, an oxidizing agent, and iron ions in combination with at least one additional metal ion.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,359,346 is directed to an aqueous acidic solution and process for treating receptive metal surfaces containing chromium ions substantially all of which are in the trivalent state, hydrogen ions to provide a pH of about 1.2 to 2.5, an oxidizing agent, and cerium ions.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,359,348 teaches an aqueous acidic solution and process for treating metal surfaces. The solution contains chromium ions substantially all of which are present in the trivalent state, hydrogen ions to provide a pH of about 1.2 to 2.5, an oxidizing agent, a stabilizing agent, and at least one additional metal ion.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,367,099 teaches an aqueous acidic treating solution containing as its essential constituents chromium ions, substantially all of which are present in the trivalent state, hydrogen ions to provide a solution pH of about 1.2 to 2.5, an oxidizing agent, and at least one additional metal ion present in an amount effective to activate the bath and formation of a chromate passivate film of the desired appearance on the substrate treated.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,384,902 teaches an aqueous acidic solution containing chromium ions substantially all of which are in the trivalent state, hydrogen ions to provide a pH of about 1.2 to 2.5, an oxidizing agent, a bath soluble and compatible silicate compound to provide improved corrosion protection, and at least one additional metal ion.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,578,122 teaches an aqueous acidic treating solution comprising chromium ions substantially all of which are present in the trivalent state, hydrogen ions to provide an operating solution pH of about 1.2 to 2.5, nitrate ions as the essential oxidizing agent, and at least one additional activation metal ion. Importantly, the patent require at least 4:1 nitrate ions to chromium and activating metal ions, resulting in excess oxidizing agent which is damaging to the overall film quality and may lead to generation of undesirable Cr(VI).
Finally, U.S. Pat. No. 6,096,140 teaches a metallic surface treating solution with a pH of 0.1 to 6.5 comprising a source of at least one selected from the group consisting of Mo, W, V, Nb, Ta, Ti, Zr, Ce, Sr, and trivalent chromium, an oxidizing substance source, and an oxyacid or oxyacid salt of phosphorus or its anhydride.
In each of the above-described patents, an oxidizing agent is included as an essential ingredient in the hexavalent chromium-free solution. It is known in the art that the presence of oxidizing agents may lead to some conversion of trivalent chromium to hexavalent chromium during the formation of the conversion coating. The presence of this hexavalent chromium may then lead to some or all of the previously described problems. Furthermore, the inclusion of an oxidizing agent may add additional costs and steps to the formation of the conversion coatings.
Therefore, the development of a hexavalent chromium-free conversion coating that provides similar attributes to traditional hexavalent chromium systems is desirable. Such a hexavalent chromium-free coating is preferably substantially impervious to moisture and able to withstand a salt spray test for up to about 12 to 24 hours. Furthermore, the coating should simultaneously enhance the appearance of the substrate by imparting an attractive, brightly polished finish.
The present invention provides an aesthetically pleasing, and corrosion inhibiting, hexavalent chromium-free, trivalent chromium conversion coating.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a conversion coating bath comprised of chromium (III) ions, cobalt (II) ions, and nitrate ions is provided. Nitrate ions are provided at a ratio relative to Cr and Co of less than 1.5:1. The coating composition is substantially free of chromium (VI) ions and substantially free of an oxidizing agent.
According to a preferred embodiment, the composition of a working conversion-coating solution comprises about 0.022 to 0.073 mole/L chromium (III) ions, about 0.011 to 0.035 mole/L cobalt (II) ions, a film-polishing agent, and about 0.013 to 0.045 mole/L nitrate ions. The coating composition is substantially free of chromium (VI) ions and substantially free of an oxidizing agent.
In another embodiment, a method for applying a conversion coating onto an article is provided. The method comprises the steps of plating the article with zinc and immersing the zinc plated article in a conversion-coating bath substantially free of chromium (VI) ions and substantially free of oxidizing agents, the bath comprising water, chromium (III) ions, cobalt (II) ions, fluoride ions, and nitrate ions. The article can then be rinsed and dried.
For purposes of this invention, the term “substantially free of chromium (VI) ions” is defined as a solution containing at most only trace amounts of chromium (VI) ions in such a minute concentration that the presence of these ions will have no affect on the desired properties of the coating, and will have no adverse environmental impact. Most preferably, the invention contains no chromium (VI) ions. Additionally, for the purposes of this invention, the term “substantially free of an oxidizing agent” is defined as a solution containing at most only trace amounts of oxidizing agents in such a minute concentration that the presence of these agents will have no affect on the desired properties of the coating. Most preferably, the invention contains no oxidizing agents. Oxidizing agents include peroxides and persulfates.
The present invention is directed to non-hexavalent chromium conversion coatings for use over electro-deposited zinc metal articles. The conversion coating can be used in combination with cyanide, alkaline non-cyanide and chloride zinc plating systems. The present trivalent chromium conversion-coating provides corrosion protection equal to or greater than most hexavalent chromate systems.
In an exemplary metal treatment operation, an iron-containing alloy such as steel is electroplated with zinc. After plating, the plated metal is rinsed, exposed to a mild inorganic acid, exposed to the present conversion coating, rinsed and dried.
More specifically, after zinc plating, the plated metal is rinsed twice with water and then dipped in a 0.1–0.5% by volume nitric acid or sulfuric acid solution for about 5 to 30 seconds. The step of dipping in nitric acid is particularly beneficial with alkaline non-cyanide plating systems, and may be omitted in chloride zinc systems. After these steps, the plated metal is immersed in a bath of the conversion coating composition of the present invention. The coated metal is then rinsed in water at between about 20° C. and 60° C. and dried.
The conversion coating composition includes film forming agents, pH buffers, stabilizers, and polishing agents. For ease of manufacturing, storage, and transportation, the conversion coating is produced in concentrated form. The concentrate is diluted to produce a working solution of the general composition described in the following table:
The Cr(III) ions and the Co(II) ions may preferably be provided in the form of Cr2(SO4)3 and CoSO4. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the sulfate ions function as film formers on the zinc plated surface. The sulfate ions also act as a buffer and control the pH of the solution while enhancing the stability of the solution. Nitric acid is used to partially oxidize the zinc surface. However, the nitric acid level employed is below a level resulting in oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(VI). This can be achieved by employing a ratio of nitrate ions (resultant from nitric acid) to the combination of Cr and activator metal ions (e.g., Co) of less than 1.5:1; preferably less than 1:1; more preferably less than 0.5:1. Fluoride is used to polish the zinc surface. The Cr(III) ions and the Co(II) ions serve to form the conversion coating on the zinc plated surface.
The resulting coating is an aesthetically pleasing blue-bright coating. Furthermore, a colored chromate coating can be achieved by exposing a coated article to a dye, such as the Mordant family of diazo dyes, without degrading the corrosion protection of the coating. For example, a yellow coating can be produced with the use of Mordant Orange 6 dye. A suitable dye exposure time is about 5–40 seconds, whereby the dye is at a temperature between about 20 and 40° C. at a pH between about 9–12.
The concentrated form of the conversion coating composition is diluted before immersion of metal articles therein. Specifically, a bath of the conversion coating is prepared using a clean tank. The tank or the tank lining should be made from a material inert to the conversion coating, such as polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), or stainless steel. Clean, 20 to 40° C. water is added to the tank to greater than about 90% of the tank's working volume, preferably about 95% of the working volume. Then, while mixing, preferably 3.0–10%, more preferably 4–8%, and most preferably 5–7% of the working volume of the tank is filled with the concentrated form of the conversion coating solution. Finally, the rest of the working volume of the tank is filled with water. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the pH of the working bath, i.e., the diluted form of the composition is preferably in the range of 1.5–3.0, more preferably in the range of about 2.0–2.5, and most preferably in the range of 2.1–2.3.
The plated articles are dipped in the conversion coating composition bath at a temperature of about 20 to 40° C. preferably for 25–75 seconds, and more preferably about 40–60 seconds. The articles are rinsed in water, and may be then rinsed a second time in water at a temperature of 20–60° C. Following rinsing, the articles are dried.
One advantage of the present invention is the ability to form the coating without pre-baking the article to be coated to relieve any hydrogen-embrittlement. Other products require the parts to be baked prior to chromating, which also requires the surface of the parts to be reactivated prior to chromating. Baking usually destroys corrosion protection. The ability to chromate and then bake greatly simplifies the processing of the conversion coating.
The invention will be described with reference to non-limiting examples. These examples are for illustration only and are not to be construed in any limiting sense.
A series of test panels were produced to evaluate various chromate formulations. Type QD steel Q-Panels were obtained from Q-Panel Lab Products. The panels were plated in acid-chloride zinc electroplating bath consisting of 22.5 g/L zinc metal, 135 g/L potassium chloride, 45 g/L ammonium chloride, 4% (vol/vol) AmeriZinc ZCI NH4, and 0.05% (vol/vol) AmeriZinc BRT II (AmeriZinc products available from Pavco, Inc.). The panels were zinc plated at 20 amps/ft2 for 25–30 minutes to produce a zinc thickness of approximately 0.4 mils. After plating, the panels were first rinsed in water and then rinsed in 0.5% (vol/vol) nitric acid solution. After rinsing, the panels were chromated for 40 seconds, rinsed with water, and dried. Chromating was performed by immersing the panels in a chromating tank of water and the constituents of Table 2.
After chromating the color of the panels were determined qualitatively by visual inspection. The colors of the chromated panels also were determined quantitatively by the use of a Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc. Labscan II colorimeter. The quantitative color measurements are expressed in International Commission on Illumination (CIE) opponent-color scale. In the CIE 1976 L*a*b* scale, L measures lightness and varies from 100 for perfect white to zero for black, approximately as the eye would evaluate it. The chromaticity dimensions, a* and b*, give color designations as follows: a* measures redness when positive, gray when zero, and greenness when negative; b* measures yellowness when positive, gray when zero, and blueness when negative.
To evaluate the anti-corrosion effects of the conversion coating of the present invention, salt spray or fog testing was performed according to the standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) designation B 117-90. The testing apparatus consisted of a fog chamber, a salt solution reservoir, a supply of suitably conditioned compressed air, and atomizing nozzles. Using the apparatus, a salt solution comprised of about 5 parts by weight (pbw) NaCI in 95 pbw of water was sprayed onto zinc-plated steel specimens for continuous prolonged periods to cause corrosion. The onset of two types of corrosion was documented: white salts and red rust. In the tests, zinc-plated steel specimens treated with the conversion coating of the present invention remained corrosion free until well after corrosion formed on untreated (control) specimens. Further, the length of time before corrosion appeared on the treated specimens was greater than specimens treated with typical conversion coatings containing hexavalent chromium.
The specific compositions and testing results are shown in Table 2. The working solutions listed in Table 2 were prepared from chromium (III) sulfate, cobalt (II) sulfate, sodium bifluoride, and nitric acid. The pH of the working solutions was adjusted with either sulfuric acid or nitric acid.
The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiment. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon a reading and understanding of this specification. It is intended to include all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalent thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2393640 | King | Jan 1946 | A |
3932198 | Schneider | Jan 1976 | A |
4200475 | Kasahara et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4263059 | Guhde et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4302246 | Brindisi, Jr. et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4349392 | Huvar | Sep 1982 | A |
4359345 | Da Fonte, Jr. | Nov 1982 | A |
4359346 | Da Fonte, Jr. | Nov 1982 | A |
4359348 | Crotty | Nov 1982 | A |
4367099 | Lash et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4384902 | Crotty et al. | May 1983 | A |
4578122 | Crotty | Mar 1986 | A |
4801337 | Higgins | Jan 1989 | A |
5080733 | Deresh | Jan 1992 | A |
5178690 | Maiquez | Jan 1993 | A |
5200292 | Shinozaki et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5268042 | Carlson | Dec 1993 | A |
5338375 | Benderly et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5374347 | Pearlstein et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5399209 | Suda et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5415702 | Bishop et al. | May 1995 | A |
5691048 | Roberto et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5711996 | Claffey | Jan 1998 | A |
5931993 | Bradley | Aug 1999 | A |
5968240 | Myers et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6004448 | Martyak | Dec 1999 | A |
6027578 | Marzano | Feb 2000 | A |
6096140 | Susa et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6159547 | McMordie et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6280535 | Miyoshi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 995 816 | Apr 2000 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030145909 A1 | Aug 2003 | US |