This disclosure relates to devices and methods for the repair of articular cartilage defects. Particular embodiments of this disclosure relate to implants that serve as a replacement for diseased or damaged cartilage in joints such as human knees, including the trochlear groove, hips and shoulders.
Cartilage acts as a pad between bones to reduce friction and prevent the bones from grinding against one another. Cartilage covers the articular surface of many, if not all, joints in the body. The smoothness and thickness of the cartilage are factors that determine the load-bearing characteristics and mobility of the joints. Over time, due to injury or heredity, however, lesions such as fissures, cracks or crazes can form in the cartilage. In some cases, osteochondral, the lesion penetrates to the subchondral surface of the bone. In other cases, chondral, the lesion does not penetrate to the subchondral surface of the bone. Lesions generally do not repair themselves—and if any repair is made it is generally insufficient to heal—leading to significant pain and disability, either acutely or over time.
One approach for regenerating new cartilage is autologous chondrocyte transplantation. This technique is complex and relatively costly. Other techniques, aimed at repair instead of regeneration, include debridement, lavage, microfracturing, drilling, and abrasion arthroplasty. These procedures generally involve penetrating the region of vascularization in the subchondral bone with an instrument until bleeding occurs. Formation of a fibrin clot differentiates into fibrocartilage, which then covers the defect site.
An alternative approach has been to undergo a total replacement of the joint. Such total replacements, however, are costly, high risk, and involve a long recovery time.
Definitions
In various illustrative embodiments, the terms “vertical axis” or “vertical” mean a direction from the top of a three-dimensional object to the bottom of the three-dimensional object.
In various illustrative embodiments, the terms “horizontal axis” or “horizontal” mean a direction from right of the three-dimensional object to the left of the three-dimensional object.
In various illustrative embodiments, the terms “depth axis” or “depth” mean a direction from the front of the three-dimensional object to the back of the three-dimensional object.
In various illustrative embodiments, the term “medial side” is made with reference to the medial side of a patient's joint.
In various illustrative embodiments, the term “lateral side” is made with reference to the lateral side of a patient's joint.
In various illustrative embodiments, the term “torus” means the surface of a toroid.
In various illustrative embodiments, the term “tubular radius” refers to the radius of the tube of a torus, as opposed to the “major radius” or “radius of revolution”, which are terms that refer to the radius from the center of the torus to the center of the tube.
In various illustrative embodiments, geometric terms such as “elliptical,” “oval”, “circle”, “sphere”, “cylinder”, and the like are used as references and for clarity of understanding, as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Accordingly, these terms should not be limited to strict Euclidean standard.
Various illustrating embodiments of the present invention provide implant devices, preferably for use in human joints, including the trochlear groove. In accordance with one aspect of an illustrating embodiment of the present disclosure an implant is provided which may include an articular end and a stem, optionally the stem has an oval-shaped cross-section. The articular end may have an upper surface, a side surface, and a lower surface. The upper surface and lower surface each intersect the side surface. The upper surface may have a first surface curvature, a central surface curvature, and a second surface curvature. The stem may extend in a direction away from the lower surface of the articular end.
In accordance with another aspect of an illustrating embodiment of the present invention, a method of repairing articular cartilage using the implant device is provided. The method of this illustrative embodiment may include locating articular cartilage having a lesion. An implant device, as described above, may be selected preferably having dimensions compatible with the lesion. A hole may be formed through the cartilage and subchondral bone, into the cancellous bone. The implant device may be inserted into the hole so that the lower and side surfaces of the articular end of the implant device abut against the prepared subchondral and cancellous bone and the stem of the implant device abuts against the prepared cancellous bone.
In the detailed description which follows in conjunction with the drawings, like parts are given like reference numerals, and the vertical, horizontal and depth axes of a given embodiment are specified explicitly in at least one drawing of an illustrative embodiment.
The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form in the interest of clarity and conciseness, wherein:
The upper surface 115, 115′ may be generally saddle shaped. For ease of reference, the upper surface 115, 115′ may be thought of as segmented into three regions of surface curvature: a first surface curvature 130, 130′, a central surface curvature 135, 135′, and a second surface curvature 140, 140′. The central surface curvature 135, 135′ may be tangent to, on its medial side, the first surface curvature 130, 130′. The central surface curvature 135, 135′ may be tangent to, on its lateral side, the second surface curvature 140, 140′.
The first surface curvature 130, 130′ may be formed of, or along, a partial right circular cone having an aperture ranging from between about 20° to about 80°, alternatively from between about 30° to about 70°, alternatively from between about 40° to about 60°, alternatively about 40°, alternatively about 50°, alternatively about 60°. The central surface curvature 135, 135′ may be formed of, or along, a partial torus having a minor radius ranging from between about 8 millimeters to about 40 millimeters, alternatively from between about 8 millimeters to about 30 millimeters, alternatively about 10 millimeters, alternatively about 12 millimeters, alternatively about 15 millimeters, and having a major radius ranging from between about 25 millimeters to about 70 millimeters, alternatively from between about 28 millimeters to about 68 millimeters, alternatively about 45 millimeters, alternatively about 48 millimeters, alternatively about 50 millimeters. The second surface curvature 140, 140′ may be formed of, or along, a partial right circular cone having an aperture ranging from between about 20° to about 80°, alternatively from between about 30° to about 70°, alternatively from between about 30° to about 50°, alternatively about 30°, alternatively about 40°, alternatively about 50°. In an embodiment, the aperture of the first surface curvature 130, 130′ may be between about 5° to about 15°, alternatively about 10°, greater than the aperture of the second surface curvature 140, 140′.
In an embodiment, the major radius of the central surface curvature 135, 135′ may be in a plane that may be offset in any direction from a central axis 150, 150′ of the stem 110, 110′ by an amount ranging from between about 0 to about 5 millimeters, alternatively from between about 1 to about 4 millimeters, alternatively about 3 millimeters, alternatively about 1 millimeter. In an embodiment, the major radius of the central surface curvature 135, 135′ may be in a plane that may be offset, along the H axis towards either the medial or lateral side of the implant 100, 100′, from a central axis 150, 150′ of the stem 110, 110′ by an amount ranging from between about 0 to about 5 millimeters, alternatively from between about 1 to about 4 millimeters, alternatively about 3 millimeters, alternatively about 1 millimeter.
With reference to
With reference to
The stem 110, 110′ may extend from the lower surface 125, 125′ of the articular end 105, 105′ in a general direction, along the vertical, V, axis away from the central surface curvature 135, 135′, a length ranging from between about 2 millimeters to about 10 millimeters, alternatively from about 4 millimeters to about 7 millimeters, alternatively about 5.5 millimeters. In an embodiment, the articular end 105, 105′ and the stem 110, 110′ are formed as a non-modular, uni-body, i.e., one integral piece without intervening mechanical connection.
The stem 110, 110′ may be formed of a single cylinder, a single-truncated conical shape, a protrusion having an oval-shaped cross-section, or an elliptic cylindrical shape. In an embodiment, the stem 110, 110′ may have a width, w, along the horizontal, H, axis of the stem 110, 110′ that may range from between about 1 millimeter to about 10 millimeters, alternatively from between about 3 millimeters to about 7 millimeters, alternatively about 5 millimeters, alternatively about 6 millimeters. In an embodiment, the stem 110, 110′, may have a depth, d, along the depth, D, axis of the stem 110, 110′ that may range from between about 5 millimeters to about 40 millimeters, alternatively from between about 8 millimeter to about 20 millimeters, alternatively about 10 millimeters, alternatively about 11.5 millimeters, alternatively about 13 millimeters. The lower surface 125, 125′ of the articular end 105, 105′ may blend into the stem 110, 110′ with a corner fillet 170, 170′. The corner fillet 170, 170′ may have a radius of about 1.5 millimeters.
The stem 110, 110′ may include one, or more, grooves 165, 165′ about its perimeter. The shape of the groove(s) 165, 165′ may be defined by a partial oval-shaped torus having a tubular radius ranging from about 0.25 millimeters to about 2 millimeters, alternatively from about 0.5 millimeters to about 1.75 millimeters, alternatively about 1.75 millimeters, alternatively about 1 millimeter. The groove(s) 165, 165′ may blend into the stem 110, 110′ with a blend having an edge radius of from about 0.1 millimeters to about 1 millimeters, alternatively about 0.8 millimeters.
The implant 100, 100′ many be manufactured from a variety of suitable materials, having the requisite strength and biocompatibility characteristics to function as an implant, including but not limited to any of the following, individually or in combination, graphite, pyrocarbon, ceramic, aluminum oxide, silicone nitride, silicone carbide or zirconium oxide; metal and metal alloys, e.g., Co—Cr—W—Ni, Co—Cr—Mo, CoCr alloys, CoCr molybdenum alloys, Cr—Ni—Mn alloys; powder metal alloys, 316L or other stainless steels, Ti and Ti alloys including Ti 6A1-4V ELI; polymers, e.g., polyurethane, polyethylene, polypropylene, thermoplastic elastomers, polyaryletherketones such as polyetherehterketone (PEEK) or polyetherketoneketone (PEKK); biomaterials such as polycaprolactone; and diffusion hardened materials such as Ti-13-13, zirconium and niobium. Moreover, the implant 100, 100′ may be coated with a variety of suitable materials, including any of the following, individually or in combination, porous coating systems on bone-contacting surfaces, hydrophilic coatings on load-bearing surfaces, hydroxyapatite coatings on bone-contacting surfaces, and tri-calcium phosphate on bone-contacting surfaces. Other suitable coatings include growth factors and other biological agents such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP's), transforming growth factor beta, among others. In an embodiment, the outer coating of the implant 100, 100′ may be harder than the core of the implant 100, 100′. Additionally, components of the invention may be molded or cast, hand-fabricated or machined.
In an illustrative embodiment, the implant 100, 100′ is composed of graphite and pyrocarbon. Preferably, the implant 100, 100′ is graphite and includes a coating of pyrocarbon. The pyrocarbon coating may have an average thickness of from about 100 to about 1000 microns, alternatively from about 200 microns to about 500 microns, alternatively from about 250 to about 500 microns, alternatively about 350 microns. The pyrocarbon coating may have an elastic modulus from about 15 gigapascals (“GPa”) to about 22 GPa, alternatively about 20 GPa. The pyrocarbon coating may further have a strength of at least 200 megapascals (“MPa”), alternatively at least about 300 MPa, alternatively at least about 400 MPa. The pyrocarbon elastic modulus and strength are preferably tested using four-point bend, third-point-loading substrated specimens of dimensions 25 millimeters by 6 millimeters by 0.4 millimeters. Preferably the pyrocarbon is pyrolytic carbon as described in Pure Pyrolytic Carbon: Preparation and Properties of a New Material, On-X Carbon for Mechanical Heart Valve Prostheses, Ely et al, J. Heart Valve Dis., Vol. 7, No. 6, A00534 (November 1998), alternatively pyrocarbon is pyrolytic carbon as described in the before-mentioned J. Heart Valve Dis. publication, but includes additional silicon.
The above-described implants 100, 100′ may be used to repair damaged articular cartilage in humans, including ankles, knees, wrists, elbows, shoulders, and the like joints. In another illustrative embodiment or a preferred method, a patient having articular cartilage damage may be identified. The patient is preferably fully informed of the risks associated of surgery, and consents to the same. An incision may be made near the damaged articular cartilage. The lesion to be repaired may be identified, and a implant having dimensions compatible with, the lesion may be selected. The implant may be slightly smaller or slightly larger than the lesion. In these embodiments, the implant may be from about 0.1 percent to about 20 percent smaller or larger than the lesion. A hole is then formed, i.e., drilled, punched, or broached, through the cartilage and the subchondral bone into the cancellous bone. Preferably, the dimensions of the hole are slightly less than the horizontal and depth dimensions of the stem 110, 110′ and the articular end 105, 105′ of the implant 100, 100′. This may be achieved, for example, by using a box chisel and then a dill bit. Preferably the minimum length of the hole is equal to or slightly greater than the length of the stem 110, 110′ of the implant 100, 100′, along the central axis 150, 150′ of the stem 110, 100′ plus the length from the lower surface 125, 125′, to the saddle point 145, 145′. An amount of healthy and damaged cartilage may be removed near the lesion so that the lower surface 125, 125′ of the articular end 105, 105′ may rest against the patient's bone. The stem 110, 110′ of the implant 100, 100′ may be inserted into the hole, and the lower surface 125, 125′ of the implant's 100, 100′ articular end 105, 105′ may rest against the bone. The incision is then sutured by any of several known methods.
While specific alternatives to steps of the specific embodiments have been described herein, additional alternatives not specifically disclosed but known in the art are intended to fall within the scope of the invention. For example, while specific dimensions, and ranges of dimensions, have been provided further dimensions may reasonably fall within the scope of the invention. Thus, it is understood that other applications of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the descriptions of the described illustrative embodiments and after consideration of the appended claims and drawings.
This patent application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/236,811 filed Aug. 25, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4158894 | Worrell | Jun 1979 | A |
4231121 | Lewis | Nov 1980 | A |
4281419 | Treace | Aug 1981 | A |
4488843 | Achille | Dec 1984 | A |
4849692 | Blood | Jul 1989 | A |
4919667 | Richmond | Apr 1990 | A |
4945305 | Blood | Jul 1990 | A |
4964867 | Boger | Oct 1990 | A |
5019104 | Whiteside et al. | May 1991 | A |
5236462 | Mikhail | Aug 1993 | A |
5246460 | Goodfellow et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5263987 | Shah | Nov 1993 | A |
5306311 | Stone | Apr 1994 | A |
5358525 | Fox | Oct 1994 | A |
5383937 | Mikhail | Jan 1995 | A |
5580353 | Mendes et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5600330 | Blood | Feb 1997 | A |
5609640 | Johnson | Mar 1997 | A |
5645605 | Klawitter | Jul 1997 | A |
5742394 | Hansen | Apr 1998 | A |
5744953 | Hansen | Apr 1998 | A |
5749874 | Schwartz | May 1998 | A |
5767669 | Hansen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767960 | Orman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782835 | Hart | Jul 1998 | A |
5782927 | Klawitter et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5831260 | Hansen | Nov 1998 | A |
5953683 | Hansen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6159247 | Klawitter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172499 | Ashe | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6217616 | Ogilvie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246231 | Ashe | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6417839 | Odell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436146 | Hassler et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473167 | Odell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6528991 | Ashe | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6575986 | Overaker | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6610067 | Tallarida et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6626945 | Simon | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626950 | Brown | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6679917 | Ek | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6699292 | Ogilvie et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709460 | Merchant | Mar 2004 | B2 |
D490900 | Ogilvie et al. | Jun 2004 | S |
6754596 | Ashe | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6784660 | Ashe | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797006 | Hodorek | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6814757 | Kopylov et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815651 | Odell | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6854972 | Elian | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856823 | Ashe | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7027634 | Odell | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7106431 | Odell | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7161686 | Duling et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7204854 | Guederian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7264634 | Schmieding | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7314488 | Reiley | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7713305 | Ek | May 2010 | B2 |
8012217 | Strzepa et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20030135280 | Kopylov et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030233149 | Hodorek | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040039447 | Simon et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040230303 | Gomes et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230315 | Ek | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050033426 | Ogilvie et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050084513 | Tang | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050137708 | Clark | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137713 | Bertram | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060069446 | Ragusa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060190002 | Tallarida et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229726 | Ek | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241778 | Ogilvie | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070032876 | Clark | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070078334 | Scully et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070123993 | Hassler et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070198095 | Vander Meulen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070225820 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250169 | Lang | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080188942 | Brown et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090228104 | Strzepa et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2232068 | Mar 1997 | CA |
69732500 | Apr 2006 | DE |
602004003510 | Aug 2007 | DE |
60126129 | Nov 2007 | DE |
1112753 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1437104 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1955676 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2141533 | Mar 2000 | ES |
2004202233 | Jul 2004 | JP |
WO-8802844 | Apr 1988 | WO |
WO-9012276 | Oct 1990 | WO |
WO-9203117 | Mar 1992 | WO |
WO-9409280 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO-9602008 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO-9710780 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO-9819637 | May 1998 | WO |
WO-0013617 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO-0133162 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0170138 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-0243627 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-2004093767 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2007041678 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007059459 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007103362 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2007109752 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2009111624 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO-2009111624 | Dec 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Pyrocarbon in Orthopedics” downloaded from http://www.pyrocarbon.com/pyrocarbon-orthopedic-implant.php on Feb. 12, 2008, p. 1-4. |
“Pyrolytic Carbon” downloaded from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolytic—carbon on Feb. 12, 2008, p. 1-2. |
PCT Internationa Search Report of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2009/049441, Aug. 26, 2009, p. 1-2. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2009/049441, Aug. 26, 2009, p. 1-6. |
PCT Internationa Search Report of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US09/36159, May 13, 2009, p. 1-2. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US09/36159, May 13, 2009, p. 1-9. |
“Pyrocarbon-Information for Surgeons” downloaded from http://www.pyrocarbon.com/index.php on Feb. 12, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action issued agains U.S. Appl. No. 12/074,770 on Oct. 28, 2009, p. 1-8. |
Non-Final Office Action issued agains U.S. Appl. No. 12/074,770 on Dec. 28, 2009, p. 1-9. |
Non-Final Office Action issued agains U.S. Appl. No. 12/074,770 on Apr. 27, 2010, p. 1-12. |
Final Office Action issued against U.S. Appl. No. 12/074,770 on Aug. 31, 2010; p. 1-12. |
PCT International Search Report Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US2010/046654; Nov. 29, 2010; 1-5 pages. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US2010/046654; Nov. 29, 2010; 1-8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 12/074,770; Nov. 24, 2010; 1-14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,869; Nov. 29, 2010; 1-16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued against U.S. Appl. No. 12/074,770 on Nov. 24, 2010; p. 1-14. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,869; Jun. 24, 2011; 13 pages; U.S.A. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Non-Final Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,872; Jul. 6, 2011; 18 pages; U.S.A. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110054609 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61236811 | Aug 2009 | US |