Patent Grant
7255202
This invention relates to a forklift truck for mounting on the rear of a carrying vehicle, the forklift truck comprising a U-shaped chassis having a crossbar and a pair of side bars mounted at the ends of the crossbar and projecting forwardly therefrom, a wheel located adjacent the free end of each of the side bars and a steerable rear wheel located centrally on the crossbar, a drivers station positioned to one side of the chassis and a motive power unit positioned on the opposite side of the chassis to the drivers station, the chassis mounting a vertical multi-lift mast, the vertical multi-lift mast having a plurality of mast sections, one of the mast sections carrying a pair of forks, the fork-carrying mast section further comprises a freelift mast system.
Truck mounted forklifts, otherwise known as piggyback forklifts, have been known for many years. These forklifts can be mounted on the rear of a carrying vehicle or trailer and transported to customers premises on the back of the carrying vehicle or trailer. Once at the customers premises, the forklift can be dismounted from the carrying vehicle and used to transport goods to and from the vehicle on the customer's premises. These forklifts have been found to be useful particularly when used to transport goods to small businesses that do not have access to a forklift, as the deliveries may be made in a fast and efficient manner whilst at the same time reducing the manual workload required by the operators of the small business.
One such piggy-back forklift is that described in the applicants own UK patent application publication number GB2260119. This application describes a piggyback forklift truck having a multi-lift mast comprising an outer mast section for mounting on the truck, a middle mast section slidably mounted on the outer mast section and an inner mast section slidably mounted on the middle mast section. A carriage carrying a pair of forks is further provided and is in turn slidably mounted on the inner mast section. A first chain mechanism connects the outer mast section to the inner mast section and a second chain mechanism connects the middle mast section to the fork carriage. The first and second chain mechanisms are such that as the middle mast section is raised relative the outer mast section by a pair of hydraulic rams, the inner mast section is caused to rise relative the middle mast section and the fork carriage is caused to rise relative the inner mast section. In this way, a truck mounted forklift having a single pair of rams operable on the outer and the middle mast sections may be used simultaneously to raise both the inner mast section and the forks via the chain mechanisms. Therefore only a single pair of rams is required to operate the mast thereby reducing the overall weight of the forklift. This type of forklift has proved to be very successful in operation.
There is however a problem with the known type of forklift. These forklifts are often required to operate in areas with relatively low overhead clearance. In order to raise the forks of the known type of forklift the mast sections must also be raised at the same time by the rams. This increases the overall height of the forklift which may be unacceptable particularly in areas with restricted overhead clearance. The functionality and usefulness of the forklift is therefore compromised.
One solution to this problem has been the introduction of the so called “freelift” multi-lift masts. These masts are similar to the regular multi-lift masts but differ in the fact that the forks are carried by a freelift system which in turn is mounted on the inner mast section. The freelift system replaces the chains connecting the forks to the middle mast section of the known forklifts and comprises a fluid actuated ram and pulley purchase system connected to the mast section and the forks. The freelift system can raise the forks upwardly by a limited amount relative the inner mast section without increasing the height of the mast simply by operating the fluid actuated ram. In order to lower the forks relative the inner mast section, the fluid actuated ram is released and the forks descend under gravity. In this way, adjustment of the height of the forks is possible even in areas with a low overhead clearance. However, this type of freelift multi-lift mast has been found to be unsuitable for truck mounted forklifts. In order to mount a piggyback forklift onto a truck or trailer, they require what is known as “negative lift” whereby the forks of the forklift engage the truck and the forks are driven downwards to lift the forklift truck clear of the ground up onto the carrying vehicle. Due to the presence of the freelift multi-lift mast, the only force limiting the upwards movement of the forks is the weight of the forks themselves. It is not possible therefore to generate enough negative lift to raise the forklift up onto the vehicle.
One proposed solution to this problem is to provide a locking pin to lock the forks and the inner mast section in a fixed relationship with respect to each other before attempting to mount the forklift onto the vehicle. This has the disadvantage that a considerable amount of time must be spent in aligning the mast section and the forks together before the locking pin may be inserted. Another disadvantage is that the operator of the forklift must alight from the vehicle In order to Insert the locking pin which is inconvenient and further increases the amount of time spent in loading and unloading the forklift from the carrying vehicle. This represents a significant amount of time spent in the mounting of the forklift on the carrying vehicle. Another disadvantage of having to use the locking pins is that these locking pins are prone to loss and damage and should the locking pin be lost or damaged when the forklift is being used offsite, a replacement locking pin has to be provided which can result in the loss of a significant amount of time for the operator of the forklift.
A further situation where negative lift is required is when the piggyback forklift is required to navigate a step that is too large for the wheels of the piggyback forklift to mount alone without assistance. Normally, In order to navigate such a step, the operator of the piggyback forklift will extend the mast carrying carriage to its forwardmost position on the u-shaped chassis so that the forks protrude the maximum distance forward of the forklift. When the mast and forks are in position, the operator of the vehicle drives the vehicle up to the step and lowers the forks down on to the step. The forks are then lowered further until the forklift truck begins to rise relative the step. Once the forklift has risen sufficiently so that the wheels are substantially level with the step, the mast carrying carriage is retracted backwards on the unshaped chassis which has the effect of pulling the entire forklift truck and in particular the front wheels of the forklift truck forwards up onto the step. This can only be achieved by the forklift truck having a mast assembly that is able to provide negative lift. Therefore, when using the known types of piggyback forklift with freelift multi-lift masts the operator of the forklift will have to align the forks with the mast section and insert the locking pin to secure the forks in position so that negative lift may be provided to the forks. The operator of the vehicle may have to navigate a step numerous times during the course of a single delivery. If the operator of the vehicle is forced to align the forks with the inner mast section before dismounting from their vehicle and inserting locking pins each time the step must be navigated, the time required to carry out a delivery will be increased greatly. This is highly undesirable.
Another situation in which negative lift may be required is when the forklift is used to pick up goods that may have been left to rest on soft ground. In certain circumstances these goods may subside into the soft ground thereby making their retrieval more difficult. By having negative lift, the operator of the forklift may use the negative lift to drive the forks of the forklift downwards Into the ground and assist In picking up the pallet or other goods that have subsided. Again, this is only possible with negative lift. If the operator of the vehicle had to move a number of pallets or other goods that had begun to subside then the time taken to effect delivery would be increased significantly as the forks would have to be aligned and the locking pins inserted for each pallet that had to be lifted by the piggyback forklift. It is imperative that the piggyback forklift is able to provide a sufficient degree of negative lift In a quick and efficient manner.
It is an object therefore of the present invention to provide a truck mounted forklift that overcomes at least some of the difficulties associated with the known types of truck mounted forklifts. It is a further object of the present invention to provide a truck mounted forklift with a multi-lift mast having a freelift mast system that is both simple and efficient to use.
According to the invention there is provided a forklift truck for mounting on the rear of a carrying vehicle, the forklift truck comprising a U-shaped chassis having a crossbar and a pair of side bars mounted at the ends of the crossbar and projecting forwardly therefrom, a wheel located adjacent the free end of each of the side bars and a steerable rear wheel located centrally on the crossbar. A driver station is positioned to one side of the chassis and a motive power unit is positioned on the opposite side of the chassis to the drivers station. A vertical multi-lift mast is mounted on the chassis, the vertical multi-lift mast having a plurality of mast sections, one of the mast sections carrying a fork carrier. The fork carrier mast section further comprises a freelift mast system having a pair of fluid actuated rams, one of the fluid actuated rams being operable to positively control the upward movement of the forks relative the mast section and the other of the fluid actuated rams being operable to positively control the downward movement of the forks relative the mast section.
By having such a truck mounted forklift, there will no longer be a need for the driver to secure the forks in position using locking pins. The forks will be prevented from moving upwardly by the fluid actuated ram operable to positively control the downward movement of the forks relative the mast section and therefore negative lift will be easily generated to load the forklift onto a truck or to assist in the mounting of a step. Negative lift may be achieved without having to secure the forks in position using locking pins. The driver of the forklift will not have to spend a significant amount of time aligning the forks with the inner mast section in order to insert the locking pins and will also not have to alight from their vehicle in order to insert the locking pins. This results in a significant time saving to the driver of the vehicle when they are doing their deliveries. Furthermore, by avoiding having to use locking pins there is no longer the possibility of the locking pins becoming mislaid or damaged which is a further frequent cause of delay and expense when carrying out deliveries.
Generally, the inner fork carrying mast section comprises a substantially rectangular frame having a pair of substantially parallel upright side bars bridged at their upper ends by an upper cross member and bridged at their lower ends by a lower cross member, each of the fluid actuated rams is mounted on one of the upper and the lower cross members. Typically, one of the fluid actuated rams is mounted on the upper cross member and the other of the fluid actuated rams is mounted on the lower cross member. Each of the fluid actuated rams is coupled to the forks by way of a pulleyed purchase system, the pulleyed purchase comprises at least one pulley mounted on the fluid actuated ram and a chain connected at one of its ends to the forks and its other end being led over the pulley and secured to the vertical multi-lift mast. Preferably, the pulleyed purchase system is arranged to translate the stroke of the fluid actuated ram into movement of the forks by twice the amount of the stroke of the fluid actuated ram.
In one embodiment of the invention there is provided a feedback circuit between each of the fluid actuated rams so that fluid pumped into the fluid actuated ram to positively control upward movement of the forks relative the mast section is fed from the fluid supply of the fluid actuated ram to positively control downward movement of the forks and fluid pumped into the fluid actuated ram to positively control downward movement of the forks relative the mast section is fed from the fluid supply of the fluid actuated ram to positively control upward movement of the forks.
The fluid actuated rams each comprise a hydraulic ram. Alternatively, the fluid actuated rams could each comprise a pneumatic ram. Normally, the fluid actuated rams are single acting rams. Alternatively, a pair of double acting rams could be used for the fluid actuated rams.
Furthermore, the vertical multi-lift mast comprises three mast sections, an outer mast section, a middle mast section slidably mounted on the outer mast section, and an inner fork-carrying freelift mast section slidably mounted on the middle mast section, each of the mast sections being nestably mounted with respect to each other. In one embodiment of the invention, the vertical multi-lift mast is mounted on a carriage on the u-shaped chassis, the carriage being movable in a fore and aft direction on the chassis. The carriage has rollers for mounting the carriage on each of the side bars, the carriage thus being movable in a fore and aft direction on the chassis under the operation of a carriage moving ram connected between the u-shaped chassis and the carriage. Usually, forks are mounted upon the fork carrier which in turn is slidably mounted on the inner fork carrying mast section. When the forks are mounted on the fork carrier it will be understood that the fluid actuating rams are operable on the carriage and the forks are moved up and down in unison with the carriage. The forks may be pivotally mounted about a longitudinal axis of the forklift truck on the fork carrier and there is provided a tilting ram for tilting the forks relative the carriage. This will allow the forklift to pick up and set down loads that are at an angle to the horizontal in a simple and efficient manner.
The main advantage of the present invention is that the arrangement of providing both positive and negative lift on the free lift mast is particularly advantageous for a piggyback forklift as this will obviate the need for locking pins. The lengthy process of aligning the mast sections for insertion of the locking pins is also avoided, thereby speeding up the loading of the piggyback forklift as well as improving it's maneuverability.
The invention will now be more clearly understood from the following description of some embodiments thereof given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring to the drawings and initially to
In use, when an operator of the forklift wishes to mount the forklift truck onto the back of a carrying vehicle, the operator drives the forklift to within dose proximity of the rear of the carrying vehicle (not shown). The carrying vehicle is provided with dedicated brackets (not shown) such as those well known In the art for reception of the forks 23 of the piggyback forklift. The operator of the vehicle secures the forks in position by applying fluid to the fluid actuated ram 27 to push the forks downwards until they reach the lowest point relative the inner mast section. At the same time, fluid is removed from the other fluid actuated ram 29 which is arranged to push the forks upwards so that the forks are allowed to travel downwards in a uniform manner. Once the forks 23 are secured in position relative the inner mast section, the operator raises the forks by raising the middle and inner mast sections by operating the fluid actuated rams 31, 33 until the forks are located adjacent the brackets. The operator of the forklift then drives the vehicle forwards until the forks are in engagement in the brackets. Once the forks are fully secured in the brackets, the operator of the forklift then operates the fluid actuated rams 31, 33 once more to lower the inner and middle mast sections relative the outer mast sections. As the forks are secured in the brackets on the carrying vehicle this has the effect of providing negative lift and raises the vehicle upwards relative the carrying vehicle. Once in a raised position suitable for transport chains (not shown) may be provided to secure the forklift in position.
As an alternative way of mounting the forklift onto the back of a carrying vehicle, once the forklift is in position relative the carrying vehicle, the mast could be fully lowered by the mast operating fluid actuated rams 31, 33. The operator of the vehicle then operates the fluid actuated rams 27, 29 of the freelift mast system to raise the forks 23 until they are adjacent the brackets on the carrying vehicle. Once in position, the forklift may be advanced forwards so that the forks engage the brackets on the carrying vehicle. When the forks 23 are secured in the brackets, negative lift is achieved by operating the fluid actuated rams 27, 29 of the freelift mast system in unison to cause the forks to lower relative the inner mast section. As the forks 23 are secured in the brackets on the carrying vehicle, the forklift truck is caused to rise relative the carrying vehicle. Again, once the forklift has been raised into a transporting position, chains and other such securing devices for securing the forklift in position relative the carrying vehicle may be applied.
Referring now to
A chain (not shown) is connected to the carriage 21 and is led around pulley 35 on, the piston rod 37 of tho fluid actuating ram 29 before the other end of the chain is secured to the inner mast section 19c. Similarly, another chain (not shown) is secured to the carriage 21 and led around a pulley 39 on the piston rod 41 of the fluid actuated ram 27, before the other end of that chain is secured to the inner mast section. The carriage 21 further comprises a fixed carriage portion 43 and a moveable carriage portion 45. The fixed carriage portion 43 is mounted by way of rollers 47 which are retained in tracks 49 on the inner mast section 19c and is slidably mounted up and down the tracks 49 on the inner mast section 19c. The moveable carriage 45 carries the forks (not shown) and is slidably mounted with respect to the fixed carriage portion 43 in a transverse direction with respect to the main longitudinal axis of the forklift truck A side shift ram 51 is provided to move the moveable carriage 45 in a transverse direction on the fixed carriage 43. In this way the forks may be adjusted sideways in order to engage a load.
Referring now to
Similarly, in order to retract the piston rod 37 of the fluid actuated ram 29, the fluid pressure is gradually released from the ram cylinder 61 of the fluid actuated ram 29 and fluid is delivered to the cylinder 59 of the other fluid actuated ram 27. In this way, as the piston 41 of the fluid actuated ram 27 moves downwards thereby pushing the carriage downwards, the chain 53 will tend to urge the piston 37 back into the ram cylinder 61. The two fluid supplies of the fluid actuated rams 27 and 29 are interconnected by a feedback circuit (not shown) between each of the fluid actuated rams 27, 29, so that fluid pumped into the cylinder 61 of the fluid actuated ram 29 to positively control upward movement of the forks relative the inner mast section is fed from the fluid supply of the fluid actuated ram 27 to positively control downward movement of the forks 23 and fluid pumped into cylinder 59 of the fluid actuated ram 27 to positively control downward movement of the forks relative the mast section is fed from the fluid supply of the fluid actuated ram 29 to positively control upward movement of the forks. As an alternative to the above, the fluid actuated cylinders 27, 29 could both be provided by double acting rams capable of retracting their respective pistons without the need for a force to be exerted through their respective chains 53, 55. The double acting rams would also have to be operated in synchronisation with each other so that as one of the fluid actuated rams 27, 29 is being positively retracted, the other of the fluid actuated rams 27, 29 is being positively extended and vice versa. It will be understood that the fluid supplies of both of the rams could be synchronised to provide a smooth movement of the carriage.
The inner mast chain drive will now be described with reference to
Referring to
Finally, referring now to
The carriage 21 shown in
In the specification the terms “comprise, comprises, comprised and comprising” or any variation thereof and the terms “include, includes, included and including” or any variation thereof are considered to be totally interchangeable and they should all be afforded the widest possible Interpretation and vice versa.
The invention is in no way limited to the embodiments hereinbefore described, but may be varied in both construction and detail within the scope of the claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| S2003/0413 | May 2003 | IE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2788863 | Ulinski | Apr 1957 | A |
| 3039637 | Akrep | Jun 1962 | A |
| 3273665 | Goodacre | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3521780 | Cook | Jul 1970 | A |
| 4261438 | Olson | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4280592 | Bartow | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4312427 | Stedman | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4355703 | Bartow | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4363380 | Rued et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4366883 | Reeves | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4374550 | Bartow | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4421208 | Robinson, Jr. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4485894 | Soule et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4585093 | Barda, Jr. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4683988 | Shrum, Jr. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4721187 | Riddle | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4762203 | Ryan | Aug 1988 | A |
| 5065664 | Ohta et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5072588 | Lowder et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5082090 | Walker | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5326217 | Simpson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5328321 | Moffett et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5370494 | Holmes et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5395201 | Yamashita et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5409346 | Grether | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5575604 | Dubosh et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5641261 | Talbert et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5651657 | Poindexter | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5651658 | Holmes et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5788452 | Brouwer et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5813820 | Dubosh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 6062800 | Perry et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6116843 | Braud | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120232 | Dubosh et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6530739 | Fridman | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6572322 | Karr | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6675937 | De Leeuw et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 20040179925 | O'Keeffe | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050220588 | Turnbull et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2260119 | Apr 1993 | GB |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050036864 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
