This application claims priority to and the benefit of: (1) Australian Patent Application No. 2014904787, filed on Nov. 26, 2014; and (2) Australian Patent Application No. 2015902094, filed on Jun. 2, 2015, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field
The present disclosure in one aspect relates to trusses in use for building construction, particularly in the construction of roofs. The disclosure in another aspect relates to the installation of a truss within the overall building structure.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In some types of building construction it is conventional practice to construct the roof using trusses prefabricated in a factory situation and transported to site for erection onto wall frames or other wall structure of the building. Although the main structure of a roof will normally be formed by a series of trusses arranged in spaced parallel relation, in the construction of a complex roof such as one having hips and/or gables further trusses are installed to a face of one or more of other trusses within the structure after installation so as to extend transversely from the face of that truss, usually at right angles thereto. Typically those further trusses will also be of prefabricated construction whereby substantially the entire basic roof structure can be assembled on site from prefabricated components. Although construction of a roof from prefabricated trusses removes much of the skill which would otherwise be needed to construct a roof and, of course, enables relatively quick construction, nevertheless installing and fastening supplementary trusses within the main structure by installing to the face of a main truss for instance, can add a degree of complexity. The supplementary trusses require separate handling and need to be accurately located relative to the main truss and then attached using suitable brackets. This has to be done by people working at the height of the roof of course, and does involve a degree of skill. The environment in which the installers are working at roof level is not a stable environment and required “safe work practices” are not always adhered to. Many of those working on site can be at risk until a main truss and its supplementary trusses are installed, temporarily braced, and made stable. Additionally, issues sometimes issues arise through absence of adequate documentation for identification and accurate placement of the supplementary trusses.
The present disclosure in one aspect seeks to ameliorate the difficulties discussed above.
In the installation of the trusses they need to be anchored to the underlying wall structure of the building, typically by fastening the bottom chord of a truss to the top plate of an underlying wall frame and which itself is usually of prefabricated form. A typical attachment consists of brackets fastened by nails to the top plate and bottom chord, itself quite a time consuming exercise carried out at roof level. The present disclosure according to another aspect provides an attachment system which provides quicker fastening between the truss and top plate or other underlying structure during installation.
According to one aspect of the present disclosure there is provided a truss assembly for use in building construction, comprising a first truss and one or more second trusses attached to the first truss to extend transversely to a face of the first truss upon erection of the truss assembly, wherein the or each second truss is hingedly connected to the first truss for swinging movement about a substantially vertical axis between a folded configuration in which the second truss lies adjacent the face of the first truss and an erected configuration in which the second truss extends transversely to said face.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure there is provided a fastening for coupling two components of a building structure comprising a first part for attachment to one of the components and a second part for attachment to the other of the component, the first and second parts each being of plate-like form, the first part providing a multiplicity of locking projections and the second part providing a multiplicity of apertures arranged in a configuration equivalent to that of the locking projections of the first part such that when the two parts are applied together in face-to-face relation the locking projections of the first part can extend through the apertures of the second part and lock to the second part to thereby lock the two parts together against separation of the two parts.
According to yet another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a truss assembly for use in building construction comprising a first truss, a second truss attached to the first truss for swinging movement about a substantially horizontal axis between a folded configuration in which the second truss lies adjacent to a face of the first truss and an erected configuration in which a bottom chord of the second truss is spaced outwardly from the first truss, and linking means pre-assembled to the two trusses and which in the erected configuration form a rigid coupling between the two trusses to form a stable braced structure.
Embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
In an embodiment according to the first aspect of the present disclosure, prefabricated trusses which, in the assembled roof structure are to be attached to and extend transversely from another prefabricated truss, usually one of the larger trusses and which will be referred to for simplicity as a “main” truss are assembled to the main truss by hinges as part of the pre-fabrication process. The hinges provide a secure connection between the main truss and the other trusses, referred to for simplicity as “supplementary trusses”, and permit the supplementary trusses to be swung from a position in which a face of the supplementary truss lies adjacent a face of the main truss for transportation to site on the bed of a truck and lifting into position on site, typically by means of a crane. When the main truss is in position on the top plate or other underlying structure, the supplementary trusses can then be swung outwardly from the face of the main truss into its required orientation transversely to the main truss. Depending on the design of the roof structure, that orientation can be at 90° to the main truss or at an acute angle.
In the example shown, each of the supplementary trusses is of a length which enables the set of supplementary trusses to be folded flat against the face of the main truss and which is desirable as it enables a series of such truss assemblies to be stacked flat for transportation. Nevertheless the overall concept would still be applicable for use with somewhat longer supplementary trusses in which, in their folded condition for transportation, an outer end of one supplementary truss might overlap the inner end of the adjacent supplementary truss whereby in its folded state it is inclined to the adjacent face of the main truss rather than lying flat against it.
As the hinged assembly of the supplementary trusses to the main truss takes place as part of the pre-fabrication process in the factory, the supplementary trusses will be accurately positioned relative to the main truss. All that is required is for the supplementary truss to be swung about the vertical hinge axis into its required orientation transverse to the main truss and fastened at its outer end to underlying wall structure, usually the top plate of the underlying wall frame. The example which has been given is of a hip formed with three supplementary trusses hinged to the main truss. It will readily be understood that there may be more than or less than three supplementary trusses in such a structure and the general principles described herein are applicable to a wide range of other roof structures such as gables or valleys defined by trusses in mutually transverse orientations.
Although as just described the hinged assembly of the supplementary trusses to the main truss is undertaken as part of the pre-fabrication in a factory situation, nevertheless many of the advantages provided by the present disclosure can be achieved with hinges pre-installed to the main truss during fabrication with the connection to the supplementary trusses being completed on-site prior to lifting into position with the supplementary trusses being folded against the face of the main truss during lifting. This enables the main truss and supplementary trusses to be transported to sites separately and may be necessary in circumstances where the length of the supplementary trusses causes difficulties in transportation when in their folded position against the main truss.
As briefly discussed at the outset, following erection into position roof trusses are usually fixed to the underlying top plate or other structure by brackets nailed to the top plate and lower chord of the truss, typically using a nail gun for this purpose. The present disclosure in its second aspect relates to a quick-connect two-part fastening pre-installed to the truss and top plate during the pre-fabrication of the truss and wall frame and which does not require working with a nail gun at height to make the connection. A preferred embodiment of the two-part fastening will now be described in detail. While the fastening is being described within the context of fastening a truss to a wall plate, the fastening has applicability in other situations where a strong, permanent, mechanical connection is required between components. For example it could be used to provide a connection between a main truss and further supplementary trusses (so-called jack trusses, for example) in the type of structure previously discussed, after erection and stabilisation of the main truss by the hinged supplementary trusses.
With reference to
Although in the embodiment described, a locking tang extends from each of two opposite sides of each rib and which is the preferred arrangement, in principle locking could be achieved by just a single tang on each rib. In a further alternative, resiliently deflectable locking tangs could be formed on one or both sides of each slot with the tangs then being deflected by passage of the ribs through the slots on engagement of the two parts and then returning to their original configuration to positively lock the ribs within the slots against withdrawal.
In the example given of an attachment of the bottom chord of a truss to the top plate of a wall frame, one of the two parts, the female part for example, is fixed to the top plate with its slotted crests facing upwardly and the other part, in this case therefore the male part, is fixed to the underside of the bottom chord of the truss with its locking ribs facing downwardly. Fixing can occur by any suitable means such as screwing, nailing or gluing, or by nail-plates. Nailing or other fixing can occur through holes (the holes are not shown) formed in the flat lands 16, 21 of both plates and which will be in direct contact with the top plate and bottom chord. It will be understood that if the truss with its male plate 10 is pushed down onto the female plate 12 on the top plate to engage the locking ribs 20 within the slots 18, a positive locked connection between the two can be achieved very quickly. The connection is very strong and is not capable of release by application of reversed forces. In a typical situation where the wall frames and trusses and other components are prefabricated in a factory situation, the two parts of each fastening are installed during pre-fabrication to facilitate easy and accurate location of the truss relative to the wall frame during erection with coupling of the truss to the top plate being achieved very quickly by engagement of its coupling part with the corresponding coupling part already fixed to the top plate.
It will be understood that in this situation if the truss is perfectly aligned with the top plate, all of the locking ribs in the male part will engage and lock with the corresponding slots in the female part. Although in principle perfect alignment could arise (or could be achieved by manoeuvring the truss during installation) given that both parts of the fastening are installed in a factory situation which would permit high accuracy in placement, in practice this may not be possible in the erected structure for a variety of reasons, for example some inaccuracy in the laying of a concrete slab or other footings, inaccuracy in setting of the wall frames and so forth. The design of the two-part fastening provides a multiplicity of fixing points in a fixing matrix formed by parallel rows of locking ribs and slots. The sizing of the two parts in conjunction with the number of fixing points formed within the matrix can be determined so that even with a maximum expected degree of longitudinal and/or lateral misalignment between the two fastening parts likely to arise when the truss is lowered onto the top plate, a sufficient number of locking ribs will engage within the slots to provide the required secure connection between the truss and top plate. In typical Australian building conditions, the misalignment is likely to be no more than 20 mm whereby the two plates of the fastening can be designed to account for the eventuality.
In a further development to facilitate installation of the roof structure, rafter extensions can be hinged to the top chords of the supplementary trusses at the inner ends thereof. During transportation and erection of the truss assembly as previously described, the extensions lie along the top chords of the supplementary trusses. After erection of the main truss and stabilisation by folding out of the supplementary trusses, the rafter extensions are hinged out to extend beyond the main truss into the zone occupied (or to be occupied) by an adjacent main truss of the structure whereby the rafter extensions when fitted to the top chord of the adjacent truss will serve to stabilise that truss during its installation. The extensions remain in position to form part of the overall roof structure and may serve to carry tile battens in the structure. This concept is shown schematically in
Although the links 56 have only been illustrated schematically in the drawings, their structure is such that they must permit the trusses to lie in their folded configuration for transportation and craning and then permit the trusses to be swung into their erected configuration in which they then form rigid struts between the two bottom chords. A form of link which can achieve that consists of two arms hinged together at one end and each hinged at an outer end to respective one of the two bottom chords whereby in a folded configuration the two arms are lying in approximately parallel relation or are inclined by a small angle whereas in the erected configuration the two arms are substantially longitudinally aligned to constitute a bracing strut. Rigidity of the strut thus formed can be achieved in a number of different ways. One way of achieving this is to configure the hinged connection between the two arms in such a manner that as the trusses reach their fully erected configuration, the arms move slightly beyond a position in which they are longitudinally aligned into a locked over-centre position in which the arms provide a rigid lock against movement of the two bottom chords one towards the other. An alternative way of achieving the required rigidity is to provide a screw-operated lock or clamp between the inner ends of the two arms when the erected configuration is reached.
When the assembly consisting of the two rigidly braced deployed trusses is positioned on the top plate of the underlying structure and attached thereto and inherently stable as a consequence of its configuration, further trusses can be applied working from that stable assembly.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2014904787 | Nov 2014 | AU | national |
2015902094 | Jun 2015 | AU | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3175650 | Wohlfort | Mar 1965 | A |
3375624 | Mikulin | Apr 1968 | A |
3435570 | Berry | Apr 1969 | A |
3600869 | Petroff | Aug 1971 | A |
3830031 | Soisson | Aug 1974 | A |
4539786 | Nelson | Sep 1985 | A |
4557083 | Zanardo | Dec 1985 | A |
4569176 | Hedgepeth | Feb 1986 | A |
4601152 | Coppa | Jul 1986 | A |
4644628 | Coppa | Feb 1987 | A |
4819399 | Onoda | Apr 1989 | A |
4958474 | Adams | Sep 1990 | A |
5040349 | Onoda | Aug 1991 | A |
5050353 | Rogers | Sep 1991 | A |
5094059 | Ganescu | Mar 1992 | A |
5819492 | Konicek | Oct 1998 | A |
5888621 | Frohlich et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6634152 | Pilkinton | Oct 2003 | B1 |
9062448 | Richardson | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20060032178 | Jensen | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070044415 | Merrifield | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070145195 | Thomson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151200 | Madray | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080283670 | Harvey | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20130263548 | Merrifield | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150041252 | Grumberg et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150101261 | Merrifield | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160090741 | Jobin | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 014 438 | Oct 2003 | BE |
696 108 | Sep 1940 | DE |
26 34 179 | Feb 1978 | DE |
0 866 186 | Sep 1998 | EP |
2 113 616 | Nov 2009 | EP |
1 233 563 | Oct 1960 | FR |
S64 58745 | Mar 1989 | JP |
H04 254645 | Sep 1992 | JP |
2 847382 | Jan 1999 | JP |
WO 2014186906 | Nov 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16171136.1, dated Mar. 13, 2017 (16 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160145867 A1 | May 2016 | US |