Patent Grant
8190566
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
Various embodiments relate to devices communicating within a network. More particularly, embodiments relate to methods and apparatuses of an index structure in a network environment.
A modern data processing system such as a general purpose computer system, often includes a file management system (e.g., as part of an operating system) which allows a user to place a file (e.g., a word processing program file, and/or an image processing program file, etc.) in various directories or subdirectories (e.g. folders) and allows the user to give the file a name. Further, the file management system often allows the user to find the file by searching within a published data (e.g., announced by an application to the file management system) about a file (e.g., a file's name, and/or a date of creation, and/or a date of modification, and/or a type of file). An example of the file management system is a Finder program which operates on Macintosh computers from Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, Calif. Another example of the file management system program is a Windows Explorer program which operates on the Windows operating system from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.
Both the Finder program and the Windows Explorer program include a find command that allows the user to search for files by querying the published data. However, this search capability searches through the published data which is the same for each file, regardless of the type of file. Thus, for example, the published data for a Microsoft Word file is the same as the published data for an Adobe PhotoShop file, and the published data often includes the file name, the type of file, the date of creation, the date of last modification, the size of the file, and certain other parameters which may be maintained for the file by the file management system.
Certain application programs internally maintain data about a particular file (e.g., an internally maintained meta-data). The internally maintained meta-data may be considered meta-data because it is data about other data. The internally maintained meta-data for a particular file may include information that is used when a particular application program is executed. For example, the user may add and/or edit meta-data (e.g., through a “properties” tab, such as whether an image shows a person's likeness, etc.).
However, in existing systems, a user is not able to search for the internally maintained meta-data across a variety of different applications using one search request from the user because the internally maintained meta-data is not published to the file management system. In addition, when a shared storage system is used (e.g., a network based file system), a file management system of each of the nodes (e.g., the data processing systems) is unable to search the internally maintained meta-data of files associated with other nodes because of numerous technical challenges. These technical challenges include how to ensure that an index within each file management system is up to date when different computers connected to the shared file system access, modify, and create data (e.g., the published data and/or the internally maintained meta-data) within the shared storage system, how to prevent bottlenecking because of large data transfers of new indexes, and which node manages a master list of changes, etc.
Apparatuses and methods of a trusted index structure in a network environment are described in various aspects. In one aspect, a data processing system includes a master device and at least one slave device to communicate with each other through a network; and a master lock status of a shared storage device to determine the master device based on an algorithm. The algorithm may be at least one of a heartbeat messaging, a first-in-time assertion, and/or a preferred client analysis. In addition, the master lock status may be claimed by a slave device if the current master device is disabled or relinquishes the master lock.
A shared storage volume of the shared storage device may also have a content structure, a trusted index structure, and a master list of changes generated by the master device. The master device may intermittently update the trusted index structure of the shared storage volume with entries in the master list of changes. The master list of changes may be generated by scanning the at least one slave list of changes intermittently for published change list entries. The trusted index structure may reference both a meta-data library and a content library of the content structure. The meta-data library may include internally maintained meta-data and published meta-data. The meta-data library may also include a new meta-data generated based on business rules. The master list of changes may include changes made to various content files by different slave devices.
The various content files may be created by different application programs and may include different internally maintained meta-data. The content structure may be searched for particular ones of the internally maintained meta-data, the content, the published meta-data, and the new meta-data. A first notification module of each of the at least one slave device may notify the master device when a change-list entry is published by any of the at least one slave device. A second notification module of the master device may notify each of the at least one slave devices when the master list of changes is published by the master device. Each of the at least one slave devices may include a search module, a local index data structure, a meta extractor module, a change-list management module, a change-list structure, a notification module, and a prioritization module. A change-list generator of the change-list management module of a particular slave device of the at least one slave device may create a change-list entry in the change-list structure of the particular slave device based on an operation to a content file by the particular slave device.
A change-list updater of the change-list management module may update the local index structure when a particular slave device of the at least one slave device receives the master list of changes from the master device. The prioritization module may separate, within the change-list structure, change-list entries of at least two sessions of the master device based on physical station addresses associated with each of the at least two sessions. The meta-data extractor module may update the local index data structure with internally maintained meta-data, content, and published meta-data of a particular content file modified by at least a particular slave device.
In another aspect, a method of a slave device includes performing an operation on a content file associated with the slave device; receiving notification of changes to the content file; generating a change-list packet of the received notification; and writing the change-list packet to a shared storage device. The method of the slave device may also include transforming into a master device when the slave device transmits a signal to a master lock status of the shared storage device before other slave devices and when the master lock status is unlocked. The master lock status may use an algorithm chosen from a group including at least one of a heartbeat messaging, a first-in-time assertion, and a preferred client analysis to determine whether the slave device becomes the master device.
The master device may intermittently transmit a master list of changes to replace a trusted index structure of the shared storage device. The content file may be stored on the shared storage device, along with other content files modifiable by other slave devices. The method of the slave device may also automatically generate a new meta-data based on at least one business rule. The notification may include changes to the new meta-data as well as changes to internally maintained meta-data and published meta-data. In addition, the shared storage device may be searched for particular ones of the new meta-data, the internally maintained meta-data, and the published meta-data. Notifications from the master device may be received when a master list of changes is published.
In a further aspect, a method of a master device includes processing at least one change list entry generated by at least one slave device, updating a master list of changes based upon the at least one change list entry, optionally prioritizing entries in the master list of changes based upon an algorithm, and updating a trusted index structure intermittently.
In yet a further aspect, a method includes updating, by a slave device, a change list; publishing, by the slave device, the change list into at least one slave list of changes; intermittently scanning, by a master device, the at least one slave list of changes to find published change lists; publishing, by the master device, a master list of changes by collecting each of the published change lists; updating, by the master device, a trusted index structure with the master list of changes; periodically scanning, by the slave device, the master list of changes to see if there are any changes to the master list of changes; and retrieving, by the slave device, the master list of changes when there are changes to the master list of changes and updating a local meta database and a local index database of the slave device.
The method may include transforming the slave device into a new master device when the slave device transmits a signal to a master lock status of a shared storage device before other slave devices and when the master device is disabled. The master device may intermittently transmit a master list of changes to replace a trusted index structure of a shared storage device. The trusted index structure may be provided to new slave devices associated with the master device. The shared storage device may have no search management capability within its operating system and may be merely a network storage device. The slave device may receive notifications from the master device when a master list of changes is published. The publishing by the slave device and the publishing by the master device may be performed by removing a prefix in front of a file name or by otherwise modifying a file's name.
In yet another aspect, a method determines that there are multiple sessions associated with a profile of a master device; and segregates each session of the multiple sessions in a master list of changes by identifying each session based on unique identifiers associated with each of the multiple sessions. The master device may intermittently transmit a master list of changes to the shared storage device to replace a trusted index of the shared storage device.
The present invention describes systems, methods, and machine-readable media of varying scope. In addition to the aspects of the present invention described in this summary, further aspects of the invention will become apparent by reference to the drawings and by reading the detailed description that follows.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements.
Methods and apparatuses for processing meta-data are described herein. In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide a more thorough explanation of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art, that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form, rather than in detail, in order to avoid obscuring the present invention.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiment.
As shown in
It will be apparent from this description that aspects of the present invention may be embodied, at least in part, in software. That is, the techniques may be carried out in a computer system or other data processing system in response to its processor, such as a microprocessor, executing sequences of instructions contained in a memory, such as ROM 107, RAM 105, mass storage 106 or a remote storage device. In various embodiments, hardwired circuitry may be used in combination with software instructions to implement the present invention. Thus, the techniques are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software nor to any particular source for the instructions executed by the data processing system. In addition, throughout this description, various functions and operations are described as being performed by or caused by software code to simplify description. However, those skilled in the art will recognize what is meant by such expressions is that the functions result from execution of the code by a processor, such as the microprocessor 103.
Capturing and Use of Meta-Data Across a Variety of Application Programs
The method of
The method of
One particular field which may be useful in the various meta-data formats would be a field which includes an identifier of a plug in or other software element which may be used to capture meta-data from a data file and/or export meta-data back to the creator application.
Various different software architectures may be used to implement the functions and operations described herein. The following discussion provides one example of such an architecture, but it will be understood that alternative architectures may also be employed to achieve the same or similar results. The software architecture shown in
The software architecture 400 also includes a file system directory 417 for the meta-data. This file system directory keeps track of the relationship between the data files and their meta-data and keeps track of the location of the meta-data object (e.g. a meta-data file which corresponds to the data file from which it was extracted) created by each importer. In one exemplary embodiment, the meta-data database is maintained as a flat file format as described below, and the file system directory 417 maintains this flat file format. One advantage of a flat file format is that the data is laid out on a storage device as a string of data without references between fields from one meta-data file (corresponding to a particular data file) to another meta-data file (corresponding to another data file). This arrangement of data will often result in faster retrieval of information from the meta-data database 415.
The software architecture 400 of
The method of
It will be appreciated that the notification, if done through the OS kernel, is a global, system wide notification process such that changes to any file will cause a notification to be sent to the meta-data processing software. It will also be appreciated that in alternative embodiments, each application program may itself generate the necessary meta-data and provide the meta-data directly to a meta-data database without the requirement of a notification from an operating system kernel or from the intervention of importers, such as the importers 413. Alternatively, rather than using OS kernel notifications, an embodiment may use software calls from each application to a meta-data processing software which receives these calls and then imports the meta-data from each file in response to the call.
As noted above, the meta-data database 415 may be stored in a flat file format in order to improve the speed of retrieval of information in most circumstances. The flat file format may be considered to be a non-B tree, non-hash tree format in which data is not attempted to be organized but is rather stored as a stream of data. Each meta-data object or meta-data file will itself contain fields, such as the fields shown in the examples of
A flexible query language may be used to search the meta-data database in the same way that such query languages are used to search other databases. The data within each meta-data file may be packed or even compressed if desirable. As noted above, each meta-data file, in certain embodiments, will include a persistent identifier which uniquely identifies its corresponding data file. This identifier remains the same even if the name of the file is changed or the file is modified. This allows for the persistent association between the particular data file and its meta-data.
User Interface Aspects
Various different examples of user interfaces for inputting search parameters and for displaying search results are provided herein. It will be understood that some features from certain embodiments may be mixed with other embodiments such that hybrid embodiments may result from these combinations. It will be appreciated that certain features may be removed from each of these embodiments and still provide adequate functionality in many instances.
The combination of text entry region 709 and the search parameter menu bar allow a user to specify a search query or search parameters. Each of the configurable pull down menus presents a user with a list of options to select from when the user activates the pull down menu. As shown in
It will also be appreciated that the various options in the pull down menus may depend upon the fields within a particular type of meta-data file. For example, the selection of “images” to be searched may cause the various fields present in the meta-data for an image type file to appear in one or more pull down menus, allowing the user to search within one or more of those fields for that particular type of file. Other fields which do not apply to “images” types of files may not appear in these menus in order reduce the complexity of the menus and to prevent user confusion.
Another feature of the present invention is shown in
The window 1001 includes an additional feature which may be very useful while analyzing a search result. A user may select individual files from within the display region 1005 and associate them together as one collection. Each file may be individually marked using a specific command (e.g. pressing the right button on a mouse and selecting a command from a menu which appears on the screen, which command may be “add selection to current group”) or similar such commands. By individually selecting such files or by selecting a group of files at once, the user may associate this group of files into a selected group or a “marked” group and this association may be used to perform a common action on all of the files in the group (e.g. print each file or view each file in a viewer window or move each file to a new or existing folder, etc.). A representation of this marked group appears as a folder in the user-configurable portion 1003A. An example of such a folder is the folder 1020 shown in the user-configurable portion 1003A. By selecting this folder (e.g. by positioning a cursor over the folder 1020 and pressing and releasing a mouse button or by pressing another button) the user, as a result of this selection, will cause the display within the display region 1005 of the files which have been grouped together or marked. Alternatively, a separate window may appear showing only the items which have been marked or grouped. This association or grouping may be merely temporary or it may be made permanent by retaining a list of all the files which have been grouped and by keeping a folder 1020 or other representations of the grouping within the user-configurable side bar, such as the side bar 1003A. Certain embodiments may allow multiple, different groupings to exist at the same time, and each of these groupings or associations may be merely temporary (e.g. they exist only while the search results window is displayed), or they may be made permanent by retaining a list of all the files which have been grouped within each separate group. It will be appreciated that the files within each group may have been created from different applications. As noted above, one of the groupings may be selected and then a user may select a command which performs a common action (e.g. print or view or move or delete) on all of the files within the selected group.
The window 1201 shown in
A column 1211 of window 1201 allows a user to select various search parameters by selecting one of the options which in turn causes the display of a submenu that corresponds to the selected option. In the case of
The window 1301 shown in
The search results user interface shown in
Then the user, after having selected a plurality of items, may invoke the command referred to in operation 2103. An example of this is shown in
It will be appreciated that this method may employ various alternatives. For example, a window may appear after the command option 2232 or 2233 has been selected, and this window asks for a name for the new folder. This window may display a default name (e.g. “new folder”) in case the user does not enter a new name. Alternatively, the system may merely give the new folder or new storage facility a default path name. Also, the system may merely create the new folder and move or copy the items into the new folder without showing the new window as shown in
Exemplary Processes for Meta-Data Enabled Indexing in a Network Environment
The shared storage device 2302 may be a standalone storage device, such as a redundant array of independent disks (RAID) device, a network capable hard drive, or other form of storage device (e.g., non-volatile and/or volatile storage device). The shared storage device 2302 may be a file server that has a shared storage volume 2312 that is shared with client devices. The shared storage device 2302 may have no file search/management capability of its own. The master device 2306 and the slave device(s) 2308 may be any form of client device that communicates with the file server. In one embodiment, the shared storage device 2302, the master device 2306, and the slave device(s) 2308 are embodied in a data processing system, which may be a general purpose computer system such as described in
The network 2304 may be any type of local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), storage area network (SAN), and/or any other type of system that transmits any combination of voice, video and/or data between users.
The master device 2306 and the slave device(s) 2308 store files (e.g., content data files such as files generated by commercial programs) on the shared storage device 2302. The master device 2306 and the slave device(s) 2308 may have the same physical structure as illustrated in
A change-list generator (e.g., the change-list generator 2350) of the change-list management module (e.g., the change-list management module 2346) of a particular client device (e.g., the slave device 2308) may create a change-list entry (e.g., a change-list entry 2900 indicating an operation 2902, a master or slave 2904, a file name 2906, and optionally other data 2908 as illustrated in
The search module 2324 of the master device 2306 and the search module 2340 of the slave device(s) 2308 may perform the operations described in
The functions of the remaining modules in the master device 2306 (e.g., the change-list management module 2330 and the prioritization module 2338) and the slave device(s) 2308 (e.g., the change-list management module 2346 and the prioritization module 2354) are best understood with reference to
If master lock status 2322 is unlocked, in operation 2406, the slave device transforms (e.g., through a response packet and/or response data) into a new master device (e.g., the master device 2306) and updates the master lock status 2322 to indicate that it is now the new master device (e.g., the master device is a particular one of the client devices that manages the master list of changes 2318A of the shared storage device 2302). In alternate embodiments, the master lock status 2322 determines whether one of the slave device(s) 2308 is the master device based on an algorithm (e.g., a heartbeat messaging algorithm in which a current master device intermittently transmits heartbeat messages to the shared storage device 2302 to indicate that it is operational; a first-in-time assertion in which the first client device to indicate that it is ready and willing to become the master device when the master lock status 2322 is unlocked wins; and a preferred client analysis in which the master lock status 2322 may have certain preferences based on criteria such as speed, performance, bandwidth, etc. of a particular client device before making a determination whether the particular client device can become the master device).
Next, in operation 2408, the new master device collects published change-list entries created by other slave devices (e.g., and stored in the slave list(s) of changes 2318B-N) and updates the master list of changes 2318A. In one embodiment, a prefix (e.g., a period) in front of a file name indicates that a particular file is being updated by a slave device and the removal of the period signals a publication of a file from a slave device to one of the slave list(s) of changes 2318B-N. In this one embodiment, the master device intermittently scans the slave list(s) of changes 2318B-N to see if there are any changes made to files (e.g., periods removed to change list entries), and consolidates all change list entries (e.g., a change list entry 2900 of
In operation 2410, the new master device (e.g., one of the slave device(s) 2308 transformed now the “master device”) intermittently updates the master list of changes 2318A based upon changes made the slave list of changes 2318B-N stored in the shared storage device 2302. In one embodiment, the new master device publishes (e.g., removes a period in front of the file name) its master list of changes 2318A whenever it has updated the master list of changes 2318A with entries of the slave list(s) of changes 2318A-N (e.g., so that slave devices can see that there have been changes to the master list of changes 2318A) so that bandwidth across the network 2304 is not extensively tied up and performance of an operating system remains acceptable to most users.
The new master device may occasionally (e.g., twice a day) replace the trusted index structure 2316 by updating a pre-existing trusted index structure 2316 with the master list of changes 2318A (e.g., the trusted index structure 2316 is provided to new slave devices that associate through network 2304 with the shared storage device 2302). The trusted index structure 2316 may reference both a meta-data library (e.g., the meta-data database 415 of
It should be noted that the meta-data library (e.g., the meta-data database 415 of
The master list of changes 2318A may include changes made to the various content files (e.g., content files in the shared storage volume 2312) by different slave device(s) 2308. The various content files may be created by different application programs (e.g., a word processing program, an image processing program, etc.) and may include different internally maintained meta-data (e.g., different fields for non-published, internally managed meta-data as described in
The content structure 2314 may be searched for particular ones of the internally maintained meta-data (e.g., number of colors in a particular image, whether a flash camera was used, etc.), the content (e.g., the actual text of a content file created by the word processing program), the published meta-data (e.g., a file's name, and/or a date of creation, and/or a date of modification, and/or a type of file), and the new meta-data (e.g., inferred meta-data such as new meta-data of “war” whenever a document has the word “Iraq” and was created between the years 2001-2005).
The prioritization module (e.g., the prioritization module 2354 of one of the slave device(s) 2308, and/or the prioritization module 2338 of the master device 2306) may separate, within the change-list structure (e.g., the change-list structure 2352 and/or the change-list structure 2336), change-list entries of at least two sessions (e.g., multiple session may be created when a user of a master device forgets to log of from one computer and logs onto another computer with the same profile, as is common within universities and classrooms) of the master device based on physical station addresses (e.g., a machine authentication code (MAC) address burned into read only memory (ROM) of a hardware device and/or interface) associated with each of the at least two sessions (e.g., two different computers at a university on which a user of the master device profile logged on with).
The meta-data extractor module 2344 of each of the slave device(s) 2308 may update the local index data structure 2342 of each of the slave device(s) 2308 with internally maintained meta-data, content, and published meta-data of a particular content file modified by one of the slave device(s) 2308 and/or other client devices (e.g., when the change-list entries are stored on the shared storage device in one of the slave list(s) of changes 2318B-N).
It will be understood that the process as described in the previous paragraph is to ensure that only one client device is in charge of ensuring that the master list of changes 2318A and the trusted index structure 2316 is up to date (e.g., does not become stale) when multiple change-list entries are created by different ones of the slave device(s) 2308 (e.g., the creation and application of change-list entries are described in
The particular slave device as described in
Various embodiments also relate to an apparatus for performing the operations described herein. The apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored on the computer on a machine-accessible medium. The machine-accessible medium may include any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer) including a machine-readable medium. The machine-readable medium includes read only memory (“ROM”); random access memory (“RAM”); magnetic disk storage media; optical storage media; flash memory devices; electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.); etc.
This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable medium.
The processes and operations presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct a more specialized apparatus to perform the operations described. The required structure for a variety of these systems will appear from the description above. In addition, various embodiments are not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings as described herein.
It should be noted that the various embodiments having modules, circuits, switches, devices, tables, processors, and electronics described herein may be performed within hardware circuitry (e.g., logic circuitry such as CMOS based circuitry) as well as in software (e.g., through machine-implemented methods and/or through machine-readable mediums). Specifically, it should be noted that an architecture for various modules, generators, and updaters of
Furthermore, it should be noted that the architecture may be implemented with one or more semiconductor devices including circuitry such as logic circuitry to perform its various functions as described above. In some embodiments, hardware circuitry may provide speed and performance advantages over software implementations of the search modules 2324 and 2340, the prioritization modules 2338 and 2354, the change-list management modules 2330 and 2346, the notification modules 2320A-B, and the master lock status 2322, etc. of
In the foregoing specification, the embodiments have been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will be evident that various modifications may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the embodiments as set forth in the following claims. For example, in some embodiments, the concepts disclosed herein may be applied to other networking standards and protocols consistent with this disclosure which are similar to, but not explicitly confined to various modules, generators, and structures explicitly disclosed herein. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent Ser. No. 11/112,351, filed on Apr. 22, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,962,449 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/877,581, filed on Jun. 25, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,730,012. This application also claims priority to co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/643,087 filed on Jan. 7, 2005, which provisional application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety; this application claims the benefit of the provisional's filing date under 35 U.S.C. §119(e). This present application hereby claims the benefit of these earlier filing dates under 35 U.S.C. §120.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4270182 | Asija | May 1981 | A |
| 4704703 | Fenwick | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4736308 | Heckel | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4939507 | Beard et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4985863 | Fujisawa et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5008853 | Bly et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5072412 | Henderson, Jr. et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5228123 | Heckel | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5241671 | Reed et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5319745 | Vinsonneau et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5355497 | Cohen-Levy | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5392428 | Robins | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5504852 | Thompson-Rohrlich | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5544360 | Lewak et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5557793 | Koerber | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5592608 | Weber et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5623681 | Rivette et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5644657 | Capps et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5644786 | Gallagher | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5659735 | Parrish et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5710844 | Capps et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5761678 | Bendert et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5813016 | Sumimoto | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5828376 | Solimene et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832500 | Burrows | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5838909 | Roy et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845301 | Rivette et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5890147 | Peltonen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892915 | Duso et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5893109 | DeRose et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5966710 | Burrows | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5983248 | DeRose et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6012053 | Pant et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6055543 | Christensen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055544 | DeRose et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6067541 | Raju et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6101511 | DeRose et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101512 | DeRose et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115717 | Mehrota et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119118 | Kain, III et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6185574 | Howard et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6199169 | Voth | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6202067 | Blood et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6260068 | Zalewski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6353823 | Kumar | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363386 | Soderberg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6370562 | Page et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6374260 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374262 | Kodama | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6389412 | Light | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6401097 | McCotter et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6408301 | Patton et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6434548 | Emens et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6437875 | Unno | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6466237 | Miyao et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473794 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6480835 | Light | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6560614 | Barboy et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6564225 | Brogliatti et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567805 | Johnson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6613101 | Mander et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6643654 | Patel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6665657 | Dibachi | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6694337 | King et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6704739 | Craft et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6847959 | Arrouye et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6917960 | Decasper et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6931432 | Yoshida | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6944785 | Gadir et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 7030308 | Yagi | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7130870 | Pecina et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 20010054042 | Watkins et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020040442 | Ishidera | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020048046 | Unno | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049738 | Epstein | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169771 | Melmon et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184195 | Qian | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184196 | Lehmeier et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030018622 | Chau | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065760 | Casper et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030084087 | Berry | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088567 | Rosenfelt et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088573 | Stickler | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100999 | Markowitz | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117907 | Kang | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030122873 | Dieberger et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030122874 | Dieberger et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135828 | Dockter et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135840 | Szabo et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030140035 | Burrows | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144990 | Benelisha et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158855 | Farnham et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196094 | Hillis et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200218 | Tijare et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200234 | Koppich et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040158746 | Hu et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199507 | Tawa | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050120246 | Jang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251549 | Hlasny | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060010170 | Lashley et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060059287 | Rivard et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20070083491 | Walmsley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133569 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 0146870 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 03060774 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO 03090056 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110238830 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60643087 | Jan 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11112351 | Apr 2005 | US |
| Child | 13156211 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10877584 | Jun 2004 | US |
| Child | 11112351 | US |
