The present invention generally relates to equipment and processes for producing tubes, and more particularly to a tube mill and process capable of in-line deposition of a braze coating on a tube, including tubes suitable for use in the manufacture of heat exchangers.
The manufacture of heat exchangers requires the joining of fluid passages (typically metal tubes) to heat transfer surfaces such as fins. For example, one type of heat exchanger construction used in the automotive industry comprises a number of parallel tubes that are joined to and between a pair of manifolds, creating a parallel flow arrangement. The ends of the tubes are typically metallurgically joined (brazed, soldered, or welded) to tube ports, generally in the form of holes or slots formed in a wall of each manifold. The tubes thermally communicate with high surface area fins in order to maximize the amount of surface area available for transferring heat between the environment and a fluid flowing through the tubes. The fins are typically in the form of flat panels having apertures through which tubes are inserted, or in the form of sinusoidal centers that are positioned between adjacent pairs of “flat” oval tubes with oblong cross-sections.
Tube-to-fin joints formed by brazing techniques are characterized by strong metallurgical bonds that can be formed at temperatures that do not exceed the softening temperatures of the components being joined, such as copper and aluminum tubes and fins widely used in automotive heat exchangers. One such brazing process is the CUPROBRAZE® process, which involves depositing a braze paste on the tubes or fins, which are then assembled and heated to a suitable brazing temperature. The paste used in the CUPROBRAZE® process contains binders and a metal braze alloy based on the CuSnNiP system, for example, about 75% copper, about 15% tin, about 5% nickel, and about 5% phosphorus. Equipment for the CUPROBRAZE® process is commercially available from various sources, such as Schöler Spezialmaschinenbau GmbH and Bondmet, Ltd., and can be an offline standalone machine or integrated into a tube mill to provide a process that continuously forms and coats tubing suitable for heat exchanger applications.
Shortcomings of brazing operations that use a braze paste include relatively high material costs, labor requirements, and inconsistent coating thickness. Therefore, alternative processes would be desirable.
The present invention provides a tube mill process and apparatus suitable for continuously forming and directly coating a tube with a braze alloy, without the use of a braze paste.
The apparatus includes means for producing a continuously moving welded tube by continuously forming and welding a tubing material, means for depositing the braze alloy on a surface of the welded tube, a sizing station to establish a desired outer shape and desired outer dimensions for the welded tube before deposition of the braze alloy, means for removing a bow in the welded tube following deposition of the braze alloy as the welded tube travels away from the depositing means. The depositing means includes at least one wire arc spray gun and at least one wire of a metallic material. The wire arc spray gun is operable to heat the metallic material and cause the metallic material to travel in a direction transverse to the direction that the welded tube is traveling and then deposit on the surface of the welded tube to form an adherent layer of the braze alloy.
The process of this invention involves operating a tube mill to produce a continuously moving welded tube by continuously forming and welding a tubing material, and then passing the welded tube through a sizing station to establish a desired outer shape and desired outer dimensions for the welded tube. The braze alloy is then deposited on a roughened surface of the welded tube that is clean and free of oils and coolants, after which any bow in the welded tube is removed. The braze alloy is deposited with at least one wire arc spray gun that heats a wire of a metallic material. The metallic material travels in a direction transverse to the direction the welded tube travels and deposits on the roughened surface of the welded tube to form an adherent layer of the braze alloy.
The apparatus and process of this invention provide for in-line forming and braze alloy coating of a tube whose diameter can be consistently produced for assembly with a manifold of a heat exchanger. The thermal spray process produces a braze alloy layer that is strong, clean, and dense without damaging or causing metallurgical changes within the tube, while any distortion of the tube caused by the thermal spray process is removed in-line with a bow control unit. The apparatus performs a sizing operation prior to coating deposition, and is therefore capable of producing an uncoated tube without requiring any adjustment or replacement of rolls used to form and size the tube.
Compared to prior deposition processes that deposit a braze paste, the apparatus and process of this invention are capable of directly forming on the tube surface a thin, uniform, and dense braze alloy layer immediately after the tube is formed on a tube mill and at typical tube mill speeds so that a continuous tube is coated and sized correctly as it leaves the tube mill. In further contrast to processes employing a braze paste, a secondary operation to dry the braze alloy layer is not required, and material costs are significantly reduced since the metallic material and the directly-deposited braze alloy layer do not require any binders.
Other objects and advantages of this invention will be better appreciated from the following detailed description.
Illustrated in
Preferred braze alloys for forming the coating on a copper alloy tube 12 contain copper, tin, nickel, and phosphorus, though it is foreseeable that other coating materials could be used on copper alloy tubes 12 as well as on tubes 12 formed of other alloys. In practice, it has been determined that the coating must contain at least one weight percent nickel for field corrosion resistance and sufficient phosphorus as a flux during a subsequent brazing operation, for example, to remove oxides during brazing of a copper tube 12 to copper fins to form a heat exchanger. Preferred compositions for the braze alloy depend on the form in which the alloy is provided for deposition, which in turn depends on the thermal spray process used as discussed in greater detail below. In a preferred embodiment, the braze alloy is in wire form and preferably contains, by weight, about 6% to about 7% tin, about 1% to about 2.5% nickel, and about 6% to about 7% phosphorus, with the balance being copper and incidental impurities. If used in powder form, the braze alloy preferably contains, by weight, about 9.0% to about 15.6% tin, about 4.2% to about 5.4% nickel, about 5.3% to about 6.2% phosphorus, about 74.9% to about 79.4% copper, and incidental impurities. In practice, a minimum coating thickness of about 0.0007 inch (about 18 micrometers) is believed necessary to obtain an acceptable tube-to-fin braze. On a coverage basis, braze alloys of this invention are preferably deposited at a rate of about 100 to about 150 grams/m2 on the tube 12 to obtain a good braze, though lesser and greater deposition rates are foreseeable.
The dimensional tolerances for the rolls 20 are particularly critical if the tube 12 is to be assembled in a heat exchanger, requiring that the tube 12 is consistently formed to have a shape and diameter that will assemble with tube ports formed in the manifolds of the heat exchanger. As such, conventional practice when producing uncoated welded tubing is to place a sizing station as one of the last stations of a tube mill prior to cutting individual tubes to length at a cutoff station. A typical sizing station contains at least four pairs of rolls, each precisely sized to progressively establish the desired outer shape and dimensions of the tube being produced.
To ensure proper sizing of the coated welded tube 12 produced by this invention, conventional wisdom would also be to place a sizing station after the coating has been deposited and immediately prior to cutoff. However,
Immediately downstream of the sizing station 36,
As known in the art, thermal spray processes involve spraying molten or at least heat-softened material onto a substrate surface to form a coating. A thermal spray process particularly encompassed by this invention is arc spray (also known as wire arc spray). In conventional wire arc spray processes, two wires of the desired coating material are typically used as electrodes across which a high voltage discharge is maintained to melt the wires, and air is forced between the two wires to atomize and propel the molten wire material at the substrate being coated. To deposit a braze alloy coating with the preferred wire composition noted above, the bulk composition of the wires will typically be essentially the same as the desired braze alloy coating. For this purpose, the entire wire may have the composition of the desired coating, or the wire can be formed to have a hollow core formed of copper or tin and filled with a powder whose composition is the balance of the desired coating.
While various wire arc spray could possibly be used with the present invention, the Model BP400 Electric Arc Spray System, available from Praxair Surface Technologies, has been determined to be capable of use with the invention, whereas other types of wire arc spray systems have not, in particular, wire arc spray systems with motorized wire pull-type systems that require relatively large diameter wires. A suitable standoff distance between the tube 12 and the wire tips is about two to about three inches (about 5 to about 7.5 cm), with greater standoff distances causing oxidation of the deposited material to the detriment of its brazeability. A suitable pressure for the air employed to atomize and propel the molten wire material is about 20 to about 35 psi (about 1.4 to 2.4 bar). To minimize deflection of the tube 12 during the coating process, a fixed and rigid support 27 for the tube 12 is preferably located opposite each spray gun 28.
Using an arc spray process, it has been determined that a shroud or atmosphere of inert or nonreactive gas is not required to avoid oxidation of the braze alloy while it is molten during and immediately after deposition. Instead, clean, dry compressed air has been found to work well as the carrier gas and deposition atmosphere, without resulting in excessive oxidation that would interfere with the brazing operation. The brazeability of the deposited coating can be judged based on its color. A coating having a gray color is sufficiently oxide-free to permit subsequent brazing. While exhibiting good adhesion, a gold-colored coating is oxidized to the extent that it will not braze successfully. Brazeability of the deposited coating is also dependent on the coating thickness, which as noted before is preferably at least about 0.0007 inch (about 18 micrometers), and preferably deposited at a rate of about 100 to about 150 grams/m2 on a coverage basis. Importantly, the deposition rate can be carefully controlled with the arc spray process so that the final diameter of the tube 12 following coating can be accurately controlled, thereby eliminating any need for a sizing operation following coating deposition.
Another known thermal spray process that has been determined to perform poorly at best with this invention is plasma spray (also known as plasma arc spray and nontransferred arc spray). In plasma spray processes, material in powder form (preferably with the powder composition noted above) is injected into a very high temperature plasma generated by a gas (typically argon, nitrogen, hydrogen, or helium) forced through a high voltage discharge between two electrodes, causing the gas to rapidly heat and accelerate to a high velocity that carries the molten powder to the substrate being coated. The hot material impacts the substrate surface and rapidly cools to form the coating. This process is sometimes referred to as a cold process (relative to the substrate material) since the substrate temperature can be kept low during processing, thus avoiding damage, metallurgical changes, and distortion to the substrate material. However, at linear speeds preferably employed by this invention (up to about 150 meters per minute), plasma spray processes have been thus far found incapable of depositing a sufficient amount of braze alloy for a brazing operation, and the deposited coating tends to be brittle and flake off. Another shortcoming of plasma spray processes is their use of nitrogen as the plasma gas and argon to start the actual arc, necessitating a controlled argon purge to start the plasma gun then switching to nitrogen. Also, wire arc spray processes can immediately start spraying the braze alloy, whereas plasma spray processes require a minute or two to warm up before spraying can commence.
Thermal spray guns are typically only about 50% to about 80% efficient, necessitating that spray rates must accordingly exceed the coating coverage desired for the tube 12. If the coating is deposited by wire arc spraying, the desired coating coverage is also affected by the diameter of the wires used, which can be limited by the capability of forming small wires of certain braze alloys. As such, when optimizing a wire arc spray process, those skilled in the art will take into consideration typical wire arc spray rates, wire diameters, amperage of the power supply, and capabilities of wire feeders. Multiple arc spray guns 28 will typically be needed in view of the typical high line speeds of production tube mills, as well as for large tube cross-sections. The guns 28 can be arranged in a straight line, W, or V-shaped pattern along the horizontal direction of travel of the tube 12 through the enclosure 30. The interior walls of the enclosure 30 are preferably coated with a non-stick surface treatment or are otherwise formed of a material that inhibits adhesion of the over-spray from the spray guns 28.
The deflection of the tube 12 is minimized during the coating process with the fixed support 27, bowing of the tube 12 nonetheless occurs, presumably due to the heat of the coating process and the braze coating surface tension. As such,
Finally,
While the invention has been described in terms of particular embodiments, it is apparent that other forms could be adopted by one skilled in the art. Therefore, the scope of the invention is to be limited only by the following claims.
This is a continuation-in-part patent application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/160,118, filed Jun. 9, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/521,643 filed Jun. 9, 2004, and 60/522,287 filed Sep. 13, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4318289 | Eaton | Mar 1982 | A |
4681772 | Rairden, III | Jul 1987 | A |
5044293 | Andoe | Sep 1991 | A |
5217746 | Lenling et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5482744 | Pearson | Jan 1996 | A |
5656332 | Saito et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5733662 | Bogachek | Mar 1998 | A |
5784776 | Saito et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5868299 | Abbey, III | Feb 1999 | A |
6042659 | Brown et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6198068 | Lindstrom | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6319615 | Jansen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6530514 | Shabtay | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6997371 | Shabtay | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7000823 | Dockus et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7032808 | Shabtay | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20010037559 | Prater et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020100793 | Fried | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030155409 | Dockus et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161966 | Bible et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040035910 | Dockus et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035911 | Dockus et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038070 | Dockus et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050184132 | Shabtay | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060054184 | Mozetic et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080034571 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60521643 | Jun 2004 | US | |
60522287 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11160118 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 11859895 | US |