1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an improved tubular structure with unique properties suitable for a wide array of applications, including use in manufacturing, as apparatus for positioning and deploying medical diagnostic and treatment devices in a body, and in other uses.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
It is a known property of many tubular constructs, such as those made from flexible plastic materials, that the tube will contract in diameter if the tube is elongated longitudinally. This property is commonly referred to as “necking.” Such necking can be problematic in many applications.
For instance, if a plastic wrap is applied over a mandrel in a manufacturing process, pulling on the end of the plastic wrap to remove the wrap from the mandrel will result in the wrap necking down on the mandrel. This often makes it difficult or impossible to slide the plastic wrap off the mandrel, requiring cutting of the wrap or distortion of the mandrel to separate the wrap.
Similarly, necking can likewise be a factor if a plastic tube is used to contain or constrain a device. For instance, in self-expanding medical devices for remote deployment in a patient, such as a stent or blood filter, the device designer must accommodate necking of the plastic tube if it is to be separated from the medical device through the relative sliding of the device and the constraining tube. Typically this requires using plastic tubes that resist necking, such as thicker and/or stiffer materials that can add undesirable profile to the device and/or reduce its flexibility and maneuverability within the body. Optimizing compactness and flexibility are highly desirable as physicians try to reach tighter treatment sites through smaller and more tortuous vessels.
Alternatively, a medical device designer may employ other deployment methods to separate the tube from the implantable device. For instance, a constraining sleeve can be designed to be cut or split from the implantable device, such as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,561 to Leopold et al. Others have suggested everting the sleeve to reduce the force required to slide the sleeve from the implantable device. Variations on this concept are described in, for instance, U.S. Pat. No. 4,732,152 to Wallsten, U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,135 to Fraser et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,942,682 to Vrba et al., and US Application 2006/0025844 to Majercak et al., and US Patent Application 2006/0030923 to Gunderson.
While everting sheaths can reduce the tension that must be applied to the constraining sleeve, they still can require considerable tension in order to pull the sheath over itself and the self-expanding device during deployment, resulting mainly from the friction of everted portion of the sheath rubbing against the non-everted portion of the sheath while the sheath is being removed. To whatever degree the sleeve material necks down on the device during deployment, this further complicates device design. These concerns are compounded with longer device lengths and more tightly compacted self-expanding devices that exert greater outward pressures. The greater the tension needed to evert and remove the sheath, the more demanding it is for the medical staff to remove the sheath while trying to hold the apparatus in its exact position during deployment. Increased deployment tensions also require more substantial sheath constructions so as to avoid sheath and deployment line breakage during deployment. It is believed that these deficiencies of everting sheaths may have limited practical applications for such deployment methods.
In co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/014,536 to Irwin et al. (MP/273) a deployment sheath has been proposed that includes diametrically stored material to assist in sheath removal during implantable device deployment. For example, by constructing a constraining sheath with one or more folds or “pleats,” it is much easier to evert the sleeve over itself during deployment by allowing the pleats to open as the sheath everts over itself. This essentially produces an inverse effect from necking—as the pleats open, the tubular sheath appears to grow diametrically while it is everting on itself. It has been found that this greatly aids in the deployment process. As a result, such pleated deployment sheaths are believed to be useful in a wide array of medical diagnostic and treatment devices, including stents, stent-grafts, balloons, blood filters, occluders, probes, valves, electronic leads, orthopedic devices, etc.
Plainly pleated tubes can be used not only to address the problem of necking, but actually can allow the tube to increase in effective diameter as axial force is applied to the tube. This is a major advancement over prior medical device deployment apparatus. Nevertheless, providing pleated sheaths with tightly controlled “growth” properties, as is required for medical device deployment, requires careful design and quality assurance controls. Pleated sheaths also work best when deployed in everted tube configurations.
Employing a pleated sheath to constrain and deploy a medical device such as when used as described above, may be desirable but it is recognized that a single layer of material would be preferable for such applications since it further reduces device profile.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to develop a tubular apparatus that is capable of increasing diametrically as axial tension is applied to it.
It would be further desirable to develop such a tubular construct that increases in diameter when axially elongated that can be used in single or multiple layers, both with and without pleats.
The present invention is directed to an improved tubular structure that is adapted to increase in diameter when axial force is applied to the structure. This increase in diameter may be accomplished by constructing the tube from multiple layers of material that move relative to each other during axial elongation of the tube. The tube of the present invention can be used both to avoid problems in “necking” found in many prior tube devices, and to provide additional benefits that increases in diameter of the tube during axial elongation can provide. As such, the tube of the present invention may be useful as a manufacturing aid, as a deployment sheath (for example, to deliver medical devices), and in other applications that may benefit from easier tubular sheath removal.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the tubular structure comprises a first helical wrap at a first wrap angle and a second helical wrap at a second wrap angle, the tubular structure having a first diameter and a first axial length. When the tubular structure is increased from the first axial length to an elongated second axial length, the first diameter increases to an enlarged second diameter.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, the tubular structure has a longitudinal axis comprising a wrap of at least one tape at a first wrap angle of x, and a wrap of at least one tape at a second wrap angle of y, with both wraps being in the same relative direction. The two wrap angles x and y are both formed at an angle of 0 to 90 degrees relative to the axis of the tubular structure, angle x being an angle different from angle y, and x and y oriented at an acute included angle with respect to each other. When axial force is applied to the tubular structure, both angle x and angle y decrease relative to the longitudinal axis, and the acute included angle between x and y increases. Preferably one or both of the tapes is anisotropic, being relatively non-compliant in the direction of wrap. Constructed in this manner, when the tubular structure is increased from the first axial length to an elongated second axial length, the first diameter increases to an enlarged second diameter.
A further defined construct of the present invention comprises a tubular structure having a first axial length and a first diameter wherein under tension an off-axis strain is formed in the tubular structure. When tension is applied to the tubular structure, the tubular structure assumes a second elongated axial length and an enlarged second diameter.
Further defined, the present invention comprises a tubular device having a tubular structure with at least one helically-oriented element and a diameter. Application of axial force to the tubular device causes the helically-oriented element to at least partially unwind, increasing the diameter of the tubular device.
One of the advantages of the present invention is that it can be utilized as a single layer of uniform thickness. When used, for instance, to deploy medical devices, these properties are believed to provide important benefits over prior everted and/or pleated tubes. However, it should be appreciated that the present invention can be incorporated with either everted or pleated constructs (or both) to provide additional improved properties. In all these various iterations, the present invention provides the benefit of allowing delivery of a remotely deliverable medical device with smaller and more flexible profile, and deployment of the device with less tension and more accurate placement.
As a medical device deployment apparatus, the present invention may be used to deploy a wide variety of devices to diagnose and/or treat patients. Such devices may include stents, stent-grafts, balloons, blood filters, occluders, probes, valves, electronic leads (e.g., pacing or defibrillator leads), orthopedic devices, etc. The deployment apparatus of the present invention may be modified to address many different device delivery and deployment needs. For instance, the number of wraps, the wrap angles, the types of wrap materials, the use of slits or other biasing means, the use of pleats, the orientation of the pleats, the use of sheath eversion, etc., can be adjusted to allow devices to deploy in different manners. Additionally, the sheaths of the present invention can be mounted in a variety of ways on devices to accommodate different deployment requirements, such as allowing a device to deploy off a catheter hub-to-tip, or tip-to-hub, or from a mid-point of a device outward in both directions.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.
In the drawings:
Reference will now be made in detail to an embodiment of the present invention, example of which is illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The present invention is directed to an improved tubular structure that is adapted to increase in diameter when axial force is applied to the structure. This increase in diameter is preferably accomplished by constructing the tube from multiple layers of material that move relative to each other during axial elongation of the tube.
In its simplest form, the tubular structure of the present invention comprises a first helical wrap at a first wrap angle and a second helical wrap at a second wrap angle, the tubular structure having a first diameter and a first axial length. When the tubular structure is increased from the first axial length to an elongated second axial length, the first diameter increases to an enlarged second diameter. This concept is best illustrated in the model shown in
This phenomenon may be further understood by reference to diagrams of
When axial load is applied along line 14 to the structure of
By constructing a tube in this manner, it has been determined that tubes can be designed that can provide increases in diameter during elongation of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25% or more. Even greater diameter changes may be possible, with increases of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50% or more being readily achievable. Theoretically, even more substantial diameter changes of 100% to 500% to 1000% or more may be achieved, restricted by practical material and application limitations, such as true strain off of the oriented axis, wall thinning, axial lengthening, lack of oriented strength, etc. as the angles converge and approach the axis.
There are numerous options for creating a tube of the present invention. Preferably the tube comprises two or more unidirectional bias wraps of material at different angles around the intended axis. Preferably, the angle e of the first component is between about 0 and 90 degrees from the tube axis, with about 45 to 85 degrees being more preferred, and about 60 to 80 degrees being most preferable. Likewise, angle γ of the second component is between about 0 and 90 degrees from the tube axis, with about 10 to 80 degrees being more preferred, and about 20 to 60 degrees being most preferable. Overall, the small pitch, large wrap angle e component 12 provides hoop strength to the tube; the large pitch/small wrap angle γ component 16 provides axial strength and limits axial strain.
For some applications it may be desirable to include additional wraps of three, four, five, or more layers of material to provide additional strength, more thickness or cushioning, modified permeability, or other application-specific desirable properties.
The components of the tube of the present invention may take numerous forms. For most applications it is preferred to employ tapes of material that provided oriented strength and minimal compliance in the direction of their respective wrap angles. The first component should be fixed to the second component such that a change in angle of the first component produces a resulting change in angle of the second component relative to the longitudinal axis of the tube. Off of their wrap angles, for many applications it is preferable to have a more compliant material that will allow the orientation of the two active components to change relative to each other so as to provide maximum diameter growth during axial elongation. Suitable materials for use in the present invention may include, without limitation, fluoropolymers (especially polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP)), polyethylenes, polyethylene teraphthalate (PET), nylon, polyurethane, polypropylene, polyester, polyimide, etc., as well as composite materials combining these and/or other materials to achieve the desired strength and compliance characteristics. Expanded PTFE (ePTFE) is believed to be most preferred for many applications since it provides excellent axial strength in the direction of expansion but is readily compliant in a direction perpendicular to the direction of expansion.
Depending on applications, tubes of the present invention may be constructed from a continuous material, such as continuous films, tapes, or sheets of materials. Alternatively, the inventive tubes may include discontinuous structures, such as sheets or tapes that include holes or slits therein, or even materials formed from weaves, knits, or other open structures.
Without intending to limit the scope of the present invention,
The above examples are only a few of the many various orientations of the present invention that can be constructed. For example, it should be appreciated that many of the properties of the various embodiments of
The tube of the present invention can be used both to avoid problems in “necking” found in many prior tube devices, and to provide additional benefits that increases in diameter of the tube during axial elongation can provide. As such, the tube of the present invention may be useful as a manufacturing aid, as a deployment sheath (for example, to deliver medical devices), and in other applications that may benefit from easier tubular sheath removal.
Shown in
The tube 10 made in accordance with the present invention may be formed from any material that is sufficiently strong both to constrain the device to be delivered and to withstand the tension of the removal process. It is desirable that the sheath 10 also be as thin and lubricious as possible so as to maintain a small device delivery profile and to facilitate the removal process. Since the tube 10 is placed temporarily deep within a patient during delivery and deployment, it is likewise desirable that the sheath be formed from a biocompatible material. As is explained in greater detail below, suitable sheath materials may include: polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE); expanded PTFE (ePTFE); fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), polyethylene teraphthalate (PET), nylon, polyurethane, polypropylene, polyester, etc.
In order to actuate the deployment line 44, medical personnel will unscrew the deployment knob 48 and pull on the knob and connected deployment line to cause the tube 10 to progressively withdraw off of the contained device. If the tube 10 is everted over itself, as the exterior segment of the tube is withdrawn, the tube of the present invention will progressively increase in diameter, steadily everting the interior segment so that it becomes the exterior segment of the tube. The diametrical growth of the tube 10 of the present invention aids in the process of everting, since the exterior segment of the tube 10 will form a larger diameter than the unstrained interior segment. As a result, the larger diameter exterior segment slides easily over the interior segment and is readily removed with minimal friction between the two layers.
The process of device delivery can be better seen in
It should be appreciated that medical device deployment using the present invention may be accomplished as a single layer or in an everted manner as discussed above. When employing an everted embodiment, in the final construct the exterior segment should have an inner diameter that is sufficiently greater than the outer diameter of the interior segment in order to minimize friction between the two segments. That is, in order to minimize interference between the interior segment and the exterior segment, the axially elongated exterior segment should enlarge enough so that its inner diameter comfortably clears the outer diameter of the unstrained interior segment. It is preferred that the inner diameter of the exterior segment be 0.1 to 50% larger than the outer diameter of the interior segment, and more preferably 10 to 20% larger.
For example, to achieve these dimensions, a tube with a wall thickness of about 0.08 mm and an exterior segment inner diameter of about 2.1 mm will typically be provided with a unstrained interior segment having an outer diameter of about 1.9 mm.
The tube of the present invention is believed to vastly reduce the amount of tension required to deploy a device.
The advantages of the tube of the present invention are believed to be readily adaptable to improve many other devices and processes. One example of such improved combination is to employ the tube of the present invention with the pleated tube deployment constructs that are disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/014,538 to Irwin et al. filed Jan. 15, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. In this regard, the tube of the present invention can be used with one or more pleats to aid in device delivery and provide further beneficial results.
The invention of the present invention is believed to have many other useful applications, including angioplasty devices, retrieval devices, implantable filters, stents, compliant grafts, etc. It should be noted that the present invention may be scaled to virtually any dimensions.
Without intending to limit the scope of the present invention, the following examples illustrate several embodiments of how the present invention may be practiced.
This Example describes the assembly of an ePTFE tube that can be easily removed from an assembly mandrel. On a 0.136″ steel mandrel a 1″ wide expanded polytetrafluroethylene (ePTFE) film (having longitudinally oriented strength, minimal transverse and shear strength, and with FEP on one side functioning as an adhesive) was wrapped at 40° pitch relative to the mandrel axis in a right handed helix orientation with the FEP facing away from the mandrel. Next, a 0.25″ wide ePTFE film was wrapped at a 74° pitch in a right handed helix orientation over of the first film with the FEP facing toward the mandrel. The assembly was then thermally processed on-mandrel at a temperature of 320° C. for 13 minutes. The tube was easily removed from the mandrel and no necking was observed at loads below material yield strength.
This Example describes the assembly of an ePTFE tube comprising a non-compliant polyimide film (Kapton®) between the ePTFE layers. On a 0.236″ steel mandrel a 1.0″ wide ePTFE film was wrapped at a 56° pitch relative to the mandrel axis in a right handed helix orientation with the FEP facing away from the mandrel. Next, a 0.050″×0.001″ polyimide film was wrapped at 82° pitch relative to the mandrel axis at a right handed helix orientation over of the first film. Then a 1″ wide ePTFE film was wrapped at a 56° pitch relative to the mandrel axis at a right handed helix orientation on top of the polyimide film with the FEP facing toward the mandrel. The assembly was then thermally processed on-mandrel at a temperature of 320° C. for 13 minutes, after which tube was removed from the mandrel.
The non-compliant polyimide film used for high angle wrap limits axial strain and allows the use of a higher angle ePTFE wrap. The higher angle ePTFE wrap increases the “unwinding” effect for a given axial load. The diameter defined by polyimide wrap grows with axial tension but necking can be observed on the ePTFE between the polyimide.
To see if the tube made in Example 2 can be modified to reduce necking, slits were created with a knife into the ePTFE in an orientation parallel that of the film structure (56° pitch relative to the mandrel axis), with approximately 0.050″ spacing between the slits. These slits eliminate “off-axis” strength of ePTFE film allowing diametric growth of the polyimide helix under tension without ePTFE necking. Thus, the introduction of these slits eliminates necking.
This Example describes the assembly of the ePTFE tube as described in Example 1 but on a scaled down version. On a 0.075″ steel mandrel, a 0.25″ wide ePTFE film was wrapped at a 25° pitch relative to the mandrel axis in a right handed helix orientation with the FEP facing away from the mandrel. Next, at 0.125″ wide type ePTFE film wrapped at a 75° pitch relative to the mandrel axis in a right handed helix orientation with the FEP facing toward the mandrel. The assembly was then thermally processed on-mandrel at a temperature of 320° C. for 13 minutes. This construct was removed from the mandrel and was used as a device constraint which was everted for deployment.
This Example describes the assembly of a tube which is nearly continuous polyimide which responds well to axial tension and returns to the starting diameter with little relative force. On a 0.083″ steel mandrel, a 0.25″ wide ePTFE film was wrapped at a 28° pitch angle relative to mandrel axis at a right handed helix orientation with the FEP facing away from the mandrel. Next, a 0.043″×0.001″ polyimide film was wrapped at 68° pitch angle relative to mandrel axis in a right handed helix orientation over the first film. Then a 0.25″ wide ePTFE film was wrapped at a 28° pitch angle relative to mandrel axis in a right handed helix orientation over the polyimide film with the FEP facing toward the mandrel. The assembly was then thermally processed on-mandrel at a temperature of 320° C. for 13 minutes.
Next, the tube was transferred to a 0.075″ steel mandrel and the polyimide helix was “twisted down” or “coiled” to eliminate clearance between tube and mandrel, effectively increasing pitch angles for all the wraps. The tube was then compression wrapped with ePTFE film to immobilize it on the mandrel and thermally processed for 7 minutes at 320° C. after which the compression wrap was removed. The resultant tube is nearly continuous polyimide and responds well to axial tension, returning to the starting diameter with little relative force.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described herein, the present invention should not be limited to such illustrations and descriptions. It should be apparent that changes and modifications may be incorporated and embodied as part of the present invention within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/503,785 filed on Jul. 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3225129 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
4141364 | Schultze | Feb 1979 | A |
4411655 | Schreck | Oct 1983 | A |
4569347 | Frisbie | Feb 1986 | A |
4601713 | Fuqua | Jul 1986 | A |
4655771 | Wallsten | Apr 1987 | A |
4732152 | Wallsten et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4738666 | Fuqua | Apr 1988 | A |
4848343 | Wallsten et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4875480 | Imbert | Oct 1989 | A |
4921479 | Grayzel | May 1990 | A |
5066298 | Hess | Nov 1991 | A |
5139511 | Gill et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5171262 | MacGregor | Dec 1992 | A |
5171305 | Schickling et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176659 | Mancini | Jan 1993 | A |
5211654 | Kaltenbach | May 1993 | A |
5234425 | Fogarty et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5318588 | Horzewski et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328469 | Coletti | Jul 1994 | A |
5352236 | Jung | Oct 1994 | A |
5364345 | Lowery et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5382399 | Moret de Rocheprise et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5395349 | Quiachon et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5405377 | Cragg | Apr 1995 | A |
5445646 | Euteneuer et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447503 | Miller | Sep 1995 | A |
5458573 | Summers | Oct 1995 | A |
5464419 | Glastra | Nov 1995 | A |
5476508 | Amstrup | Dec 1995 | A |
5571135 | Fraser et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5641373 | Shannon et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5653697 | Quiachon et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662703 | Yurek et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5690644 | Yurek et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5762604 | Kieturakis | Jun 1998 | A |
5789047 | Sasaki et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800456 | Maeda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824041 | Lenker et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833699 | Chuter | Nov 1998 | A |
5868707 | Williams et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5893868 | Hanson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5993427 | Rolland et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997508 | Lunn et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6025044 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039721 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042605 | Martin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6059813 | Vrba et al. | May 2000 | A |
6110146 | Berthiaume et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6126685 | Lenker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6174328 | Cragg | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6238410 | Vrba et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6254628 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280412 | Pederson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6352561 | Leopold et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371980 | Rudakov et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387118 | Hanson | May 2002 | B1 |
6432130 | Hanson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447540 | Fontaine et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468243 | Miyagawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6544278 | Vrba et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547813 | Stiger et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6607552 | Hanson | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6652492 | Bell et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6939327 | Hall et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6942682 | Vrba et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7105013 | Durcan | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7534250 | Schaeffer et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7625337 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7766820 | Core | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780630 | Jenson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780692 | Nance et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8435282 | Silverman | May 2013 | B2 |
8801774 | Silverman | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20020016607 | Bonadio et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020099431 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116045 | Eidenschink | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030088309 | Iwasaka et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030176909 | Kusleika | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208223 | Kleiner | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040044359 | Renati et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040087968 | Core | May 2004 | A1 |
20040143272 | Cully et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143315 | Bruun et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050222576 | Kick et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228479 | Pavcnik et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245892 | Elkins et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246008 | Hogendijk et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267568 | Berez et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025844 | Majercak et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030923 | Gunderson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041302 | Malewicz | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074476 | Holman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060155357 | Melsheimer | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184225 | Pryor | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184226 | Austin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200221 | Malewicz | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060276872 | Arbefeuille et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282152 | Beyerlein et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287671 | Renati et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070055338 | Dorn | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070198077 | Cully et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080097301 | Alpini et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080312733 | Jordan | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20110144739 | Cattaneo | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 163 525 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0682922 | Apr 1994 | EP |
9702791 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9833454 | Aug 1998 | WO |
0074584 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0238084 | May 2002 | WO |
03045284 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2009002827 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2010015370 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010034453 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130150949 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12503785 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 13761003 | US |