This disclosure relates to tubing hangers, such as tubing hangers equipped with a primary BPV and a secondary BPV for isolating a production tubing or casing.
A back-pressure valve (BPV) is a type of one-way check valve that can be installed to tubing hanger to isolate an attached production tubing during a well kill operation at a wellbore. For example, the BPV can restrict fluid pressure to or contain fluid pressure within the production tubing while performing well activities, such as replacing a tree (e.g., production, Christmas, or frac tree) at the wellbore or master valves during installation, maintenance, or removal processes. During such processes, an additional isolation barrier is required to ensure that fluid pressure within the production tubing does not breach the BPV. To effect the additional barrier, a slickline intervention is often performed to run a permanent or retrievable plug in the wellbore. Slickline interventions of this nature are time-consuming, equipment-intensive, human-resource-intensive, risky, and costly.
This disclosure relates to tubing hangers. An example tubing hanger includes two landing profiles that each include universal back pressure valve (BPV) threads for respectively accommodating two BPVs. The serial BPV arrangement is designed to isolate a production tubing secured to the tubing hanger. The secondary (e.g., uphole) landing profile is wider than the primary (e.g., downhole) landing profile and fulfils multiple purposes of accommodating a secondary BPV and a two-way check valve.
In one aspect, a tubing hanger includes a hanger connection profile positioned along a borehole of the tubing hanger and a first landing profile positioned along the borehole and above the hanger connection profile. The first landing profile includes first threads including a first thread feature configured to secure a first check valve to the tubing hanger for isolating a production tubing. The tubing hanger further includes a second landing profile positioned along the borehole and above the first landing profile, the second landing profile including second threads including a second thread feature. The second thread feature is larger than the first thread feature and is configured to secure a second check valve to the tubing hanger for further isolating the production tubing.
Embodiments may provide one or more of the following features.
In some embodiments, the first check valve includes a first back-pressure valve (BPV) and the second check valve includes a second BPV.
In some embodiments, the first threads include standard BPV threads and the second threads include standard BPV threads.
In some embodiments, the second landing profile further includes a shoulder disposed above the second threads.
In some embodiments, the second landing profile further includes a polished surface area adjacent the second threads.
In some embodiments, the second landing profile is wider than the first landing profile.
In some embodiments, the second landing profile further includes a shoulder disposed above the second threads.
In some embodiments, the borehole has a non-constant diameter.
In some embodiments, the first check valve includes a BPV and the second check valve includes a two-way check valve.
In some embodiments, tubing hanger further includes a wall that defines the borehole.
In some embodiments, the wall includes a first wall portion that defines the first and second landing profiles.
In some embodiments, the wall includes a second wall portion that defines the hanger connection profile.
In some embodiments, the tubing hanger further includes a first seal that surrounds the first wall portion and a second seal that surrounds the second wall portion.
In another aspect, a system includes a first check valve and a second check valve, a production tubing, and a tubing hanger. Tubing hanger includes a hanger connection profile positioned along a borehole of the tubing hanger and a first landing profile positioned along the borehole and above the hanger connection profile. The first landing profile includes first threads including a first thread feature configured to secure the first check valve to the tubing hanger for isolating the production tubing. The tubing hanger further includes a second landing profile positioned along the borehole and above the first landing profile, the second landing profile including second threads including a second thread feature. The second thread feature is larger than the first thread feature and is configured to secure a second check valve to the tubing hanger for further isolating the production tubing.
In another aspect, a method of isolating a tubing includes securing the tubing to a hanger connection profile along a borehole of a tubing hanger and securing a first check valve to first threads of a first landing profile along the borehole and above the hanger connection profile, the first threads including a first thread feature. The method further includes securing a second check valve to second threads of a second landing profile along the borehole and above the first landing profile, the second threads including a second thread feature. The method further includes pumping a first fluid in a downhole direction through the second check valve and the first check valve into the tubing without permitting a second fluid within the tubing to flow in an uphole direction through the first check valve.
Embodiments may provide one or more of the following features.
In some embodiments, the method further includes isolating the tubing from wellhead equipment positioned uphole of the tubing hanger.
In some embodiments, the first check valve includes a first back-pressure valve (BPV) and the second check valve includes a second BPV.
In some embodiments, the first check valve includes a BPV and the second check valve includes a two-way check valve.
In some embodiments, the method further includes pressure testing wellhead equipment positioned uphole of the tubing hanger.
In some embodiments, the second landing profile is wider than the first landing profile.
The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and description. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the embodiments will become apparent from the description, drawings, and claims.
The upper wall portion 108 defines a first landing profile 118 (e.g., a landing profile) for accommodating the first BPV 102. The first landing profile 118 accordingly includes threads 120 that are formed as standard (e.g., or universal) BPV threads. In general, a pitch of the threads 120 will vary, depending on a size of the production tubing 106 and a size of the wellhead. The first landing profile 118 includes a shoulder 144 that is located directly above the threads 120 at a polished area and that provides a seating surface for the first BPV 102. A diameter of the first landing profile 118 gradually decreases in a downhole direction 101 from an upper end of the shoulder 144 to a lower end of the threads 120.
The upper wall portion 108 also defines a second landing profile 122 (e.g., a landing profile) for accommodating the second BPV 104. The second landing profile 122 accordingly includes threads 124 that are formed as standard BPV threads. In some embodiments, the threads 124 have a pitch that is larger than the pitch of the threads 120. The second landing profile 122 includes a shoulder 146 that is located directly above the threads 124 at a polished area and that provides a seating surface for the second BPV 104. A diameter of the second landing profile 122 gradually decreases in the downhole direction 101 from an upper end of the shoulder 146 to a lower end of the threads 124. The first and second landing profiles 118, 122 are spaced apart by a distance large enough to allow for space between the BPVs 102, 104.
The lower wall portion 110 defines a hanger connection profile 130 at which the production tubing 106 is secured to the tubing hanger 100. The hanger connection profile 130 includes threads 132 that are formed to mate with a connector 134 of the production tubing 106. A diameter of the hanger connection profile 130 gradually increases in the downhole direction 101 from an upper end of the hanger connection profile 130 to a lower end of the hanger connection profile 130. In some embodiments, the diameter of the hanger connection profile 130 at its upper end is about equal to the diameter of the first landing profile 118 at its lower end such that the bore 112 has a substantially constant diameter between the first landing profile 118 and the hanger connection profile 130. The first landing profile 118 and the hanger connection profile 130 are spaced apart by a distance large enough to allow for space between the BPV 102 and the production tubing 106.
Referring to
The BPVs 102, 104 may be utilized to provide isolation during an operation to kill the surrounding well with kill fluid. The first BPV 102 is a primary BPV and is located below (e.g., downhole of) the second BPV 104. The second BPV 104 is a secondary BPV that may be optionally installed to the tubing hanger 104 to form a serial arrangement with the BPV 102 (e.g., without any intervening isolation or other components) that provides an additional isolation barrier to the production tubing 106 when desired. The second BPV 104 is larger (e.g., in diameter) than the first BPV 102 such that the second BPV 104 can mechanically withstand larger loads. The BPVs 102, 104 include first and second threads 140, 142, respectively, at which the BPVs 102, 104 engage (e.g., mate) with the tubing hanger 100 at the first and second threads 120, 124 of the first and second landing profiles 118, 122.
Inclusion of the second landing profile 122 in the tubing hanger 100 for accommodating the second BPV 104 provides a robust backup (e.g., contingency) isolation mechanism in case the first BPV 102 fails. The second BPV 104, being a one-way check valve, also has a pump-through capacity that is similar to that of the first BPV 102. Inclusion of the second landing profile 122 also eliminates multiple slickline intervention operations that would otherwise need to be performed for installing and retrieving an additional isolation barrier (e.g., a plug or another barrier) below a conventional tubing hanger (e.g., including only a single BPV profile) in order to protect a tree (e.g., production, Christmas, or fraccing) and master valves located uphole of the tubing hanger at the wellhead. This design accordingly eliminates significant time delays, costs, safety risks, and equipment risks that would be associated with such intervention operations. The second landing profile 122 is also constructed to be compatible with high-rate fracking operations and larger (e.g., wider) bores, trees, and frac adapter bonnets. By accelerating these rigless operations, the second landing profile 122 increases the success of unconventional operations without compromising isolation of the production tubing.
Referring to
While the tubing hanger 100 has been described and illustrated with respect to certain dimensions, sizes, shapes, arrangements, materials, methods 200, and check valves 102, 104, 126, in some embodiments, a tubing hanger 100 that is otherwise substantially similar in construction and function to the tubing hanger 100 may include one or more different dimensions, sizes, shapes, arrangements, configurations, and materials or may be utilized according to different methods or with different valves. Accordingly, other embodiments are also within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1641915 | Boynton | Sep 1927 | A |
2148327 | Smith | Feb 1939 | A |
2939534 | Allen | Jun 1960 | A |
4301241 | Saito | Nov 1981 | A |
4434226 | Wilgus et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4601343 | Lindsey, Jr. et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4660863 | Bailey et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4739475 | Mensch | Apr 1988 | A |
4754810 | Bennett et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4755456 | Sugimoto | Jul 1988 | A |
4792523 | Wong et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4830109 | Wedel | May 1989 | A |
4914014 | Daubendiek et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5279952 | Wu | Jan 1994 | A |
5318888 | Weberg et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5595864 | Van den Zegel et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5616455 | Murphy | Apr 1997 | A |
5702879 | Barcock | Dec 1997 | A |
5714323 | Ohshima et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5743335 | Bussear | Apr 1998 | A |
5785120 | Smalley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5827177 | Oneda et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829524 | Flanders et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5856733 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5954132 | Harris et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957195 | Bailey et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6020708 | Matsumoto et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039120 | Wilkins et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6093554 | Haute et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6105673 | Harris et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6142230 | Smalley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6197542 | Haute et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220363 | Dallas | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6302208 | Walker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6523110 | Bright et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6558892 | Elst et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6587187 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6621946 | Yu et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6668930 | Hoffman | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6775894 | Hardin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6825637 | Kinpara et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840325 | Stephenson | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6878549 | Vogels et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7003619 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7039786 | Suzuki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048125 | Mize et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7164999 | Tabatabaei et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7272503 | Strack et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7303595 | Janitz | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7308934 | Swagerty et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312075 | Yamamura et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7347840 | Findlay et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
PP18942 | Boer | Jun 2008 | P2 |
PP18969 | Boer | Jun 2008 | P2 |
7401647 | Baycroft et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7478679 | Berzin et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7490666 | Swagerty et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7614448 | Swagerty et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7615355 | Papadopoulos et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7633992 | Miao et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7730940 | Knippa et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7743824 | Lam et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7823634 | Chan et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7861775 | Palmer et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7900697 | Swagerty et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7934550 | Bolding et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7954793 | Weisbeck et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7997338 | Foster et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8087459 | Caldwell et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8117819 | Scott | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8127978 | Castillo et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8136604 | Jennings | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157006 | Koleilat et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8194885 | Brannmark et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8225861 | Foster et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235108 | Lemme et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8251142 | Hinkie | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8302678 | Swagerty et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8327943 | Borak et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8371374 | Foster et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8396667 | Nutley et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8397802 | Lembcke | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8499842 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8506932 | Arstad et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8550156 | Castillo et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8646533 | Nguy et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8674637 | Kamijo | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678406 | Albertson | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8727012 | Bhat | May 2014 | B2 |
8794310 | Allen et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8823558 | Barrett | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8899316 | Krawiec et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8910709 | Thomson et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8936075 | Guidry | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9051539 | Synder et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9168317 | Jones | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9194201 | Simson et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9200498 | Klimack | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9243473 | Yang et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9284812 | Mazyar et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9314541 | Jones | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9447671 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9523256 | Bilansky et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9587460 | Clemens | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9637997 | Goodman et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9695659 | Davis et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9770046 | Negri | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9909381 | Kajaria et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9925825 | Hoffman et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
9976380 | Davis et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10060283 | Tomigashi et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10132141 | Caccialupi et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10159841 | Chin et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10173936 | Flato et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10230430 | Uchino et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10287846 | Andersen et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10319092 | Wu et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10364635 | Puccio et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10447070 | Qin et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10450832 | Hickie | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10487302 | Spangenburg et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10487607 | Kajaria et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10604693 | Kim et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10612349 | Clemens | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10633966 | Pollak et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10655423 | Stein et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10662762 | Alnughaimish et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10677011 | Al-AbdulJabbar et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10724344 | Dietz | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10738560 | Duan et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10743590 | Moussa et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10753173 | Voll et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10780659 | Ahrenholtz | Sep 2020 | B2 |
RE48308 | Flato et al. | Nov 2020 | E |
10837264 | Filippov et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10893527 | Lee et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10947813 | Ejim et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10966224 | Yu et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10982499 | Alshuraim | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11041357 | Pounds | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11053769 | Craycraft | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11058837 | Stam et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11096194 | Tang | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11142732 | Spangenburg et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11174700 | Fripp et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11193357 | Clemens | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11268342 | Andersen et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11293270 | Malone et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11299955 | Fripp et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11365599 | Glaesman | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11437156 | Russell, II et al. | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11440521 | Thiel | Sep 2022 | B2 |
20020119942 | Vogels et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030100100 | Jacobs, Jr. et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030157095 | Papadopoulos et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040129429 | Dallas | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040210790 | Moon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050051341 | Khazanovich | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074885 | Vogels et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050077043 | Dallas | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060106202 | Papadopoulos et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060238437 | Huang | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080169097 | Bolding | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177592 | Masuyama et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080254372 | Wu | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254373 | Wu | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100015114 | Papadopoulos et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100068779 | Wells et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100258311 | Craig et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110081295 | Papadopoulos et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120012343 | Wilkin et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130105388 | Johnson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130288228 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140058677 | Combee | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140246197 | Smith | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150012664 | Johnson | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150041126 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150041129 | Mani et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150073523 | Chobotov | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150090255 | Gulliver et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150233204 | Tarlton | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150278138 | Seidel et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150347246 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150378937 | Yang et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20180124634 | Jose et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180171740 | Casanova | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180313182 | Cherewyk et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190055839 | Skillingstad et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190321264 | Gulliver et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200003032 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200375265 | Moussa et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210108478 | Filippov et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210108490 | Filippov et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210324699 | Trumbull et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210370000 | Stam et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220068512 | Russell, II et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220081986 | Roselier et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220086848 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220299151 | Lee et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240084661 A1 | Mar 2024 | US |