The present invention relates to equipment and techniques for radially expanding a downhole tubular in a well. More particularly, the present invention relates to a downhole tool for rotating a bit at the lower end of the tubular and thereafter moving an expander axially downward to expand the tubular as slips maintain tool outer sleeve secured to a lower portion of the tubular.
Various types of downhole tools have been devised for radially expanding a tubular. In many applications, the expander is moved axially through the tubular in direct response to fluid pressure acting directly on the expander. Tools of this type are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,631,759, 6,857,473, 6,892,819, 6,976,541, 7,021,390, 7,055,608, and 7,077,211 and U.S. Publication 20040231855. Tools that pump the expander upward conventionally use an expander receiver housing with an enlarged diameter that frequently presents significant problems when positioning the receiver housing in the lower end of a well.
In other cases, a downhole tool utilizes a hydraulic section including a plurality of pistons connected in a series for axially moving the expander, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,763,893, 6,814,143, 7,225,880, and 7,278,492. Expansion from the lower end of the tubular upward to an upper end of the tubular is disclosed. If desired, the tool may be collapsed and returned to the surface through the unexpanded upper portion of the tubular.
Techniques and equipment for expanding a tubular may vary considerably depending on the length of the tubular to be expanded. A short tubular section of 2 meters or less may be expanded in a liner hanger operation or a patch operation. Expansion of tubular lengths in excess of 500 meters and frequently thousands of meters are typically required for a mono-diameter expansion operation, with the added complexity of expanding hundreds of sealed threaded joints, which pose significantly greater problems than expansion of a short tubular section.
During the past decade, oilfield drilling operations which involve a drill bit at a lower end of casing have been used for some applications. The downhole casing may thus be rotated and simultaneously lowered in a well with the bit as the bit drills a deeper portion of the borehole. This casing drilling technique is not known to have been used in conjunction with a casing expansion operation, in part because of the complexity associated with a casing expansion operation, and the consequences of a failed expansion. A first trip in the hole has been employed to drill a portion of the borehole, and another trip in the hole may thereafter include an expander tool which then radially expands the tubular while positioned at a desired depth.
The disadvantages of the prior art are overcome by the present invention, and an improved technique for expanding a downhole tubular is hereinafter disclosed.
A hydraulically powered tool axially moves an expander in a well to radially expand a downhole tubular. In one embodiment, the tool includes a plurality of fluid powered pistons each interconnected in series for axially stroking the expander downward relative to a central tool mandrel. The tool mandrel is rotatably secured to the tubular to be expanded so that rotation of the work string rotates the mandrel, which rotates the tubular, which then rotates a bit at the lower end of the tubular. In a preferred embodiment, a splined connection is provided between the tool mandrel and the tubular. After a portion of the well is drilled, the expander is forced axially downward in response to the plurality of piston assemblies to radially expand a portion of the tubular while one or more slips secure an outer sleeve radially outward of the mandrel in the well. The tool includes a telescopic joint for expanding during an expander resetting operation and contracting during a tubular expansion operation. A method of operating the downhole hydraulically powered tool for achieving these goals is also disclosed.
These and further features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, wherein reference is made to the figures in the accompanying drawings.
A respective inner and outer piston may be axially connected when the tool is run in the well, and this connection broken after the drilling operation when the pistons separate to supply hydraulic power to the tool. Still referring to
It should be understood that the tool as shown in
Referring again to
Referring still to
Slip cage 50 is slidable about the lower end of the mandrel 12, is threadably secured to the lower end of the sleeve 46, and is furnished with pockets or apertures to support slips 52. Tapered surfaces on the slip actuator 54 are provided, so that as the actuator 54 moves upward with the mandrel 12 relative to the slips, the slips 52 radially move outward into gripping engagement with a portion of the liner L which is not yet expanded. The slip cage 50 slidably supports the slips while the mandrel moves upward. The ball seat 58 receives a ball to close off the interior of the work string 11 from the bit 60 to pressurize the interior of the work string to actuate the pistons.
The force generating pistons when energized will axially separate in response to the hydraulic pressure in the mandrel 12, thereby first setting the slips 52 and then driving the expander 36 downward relative to its initial position, thereby beginning expansion of the liner L. Once the slips 52 are set within the liner, the expander 36 is forced downward to expand a length of tubular. The inner pistons structurally connected to the mandrel 12 thus axially separate from the outer pistons during an expansion operation to generate sufficient force to drive the expander down after shearing a ring to separate the pistons. The process may be repeated for all lower sections of the tubular and that lower tubular expanded by stroking along the telescopic joint during an expander resetting operation, then collapsing the telescopic joint during a tubular expansion operation. Weight applied to the workstring may be used to collapse the telescopic joint and reposition the cage assembly 40.
A drill pipe or other work string is mechanically tied to the inner sleeve or mandrel, but the inner sleeve is not connected to the bit 60 and instead terminates below the slips and above the bit 60. The inner sleeve moves up to set the slips, and is subsequently set down to recock the assembly for an expansion operation. The outer sleeve pushes expander 36 down to expand the liner.
The present invention allows an operator to insert a liner in a well, insert an expansion tool for engagement with the liner, then rotate the drill string to rotate the liner and a bit at the lower end of the liner and thereby drill a portion of the well, then subsequently expand the liner to a diameter substantially greater than its initial run-in diameter. More particularly, as shown in
Expansion of the tubular from the top down offers several advantages compared to expansion of the tubular from the bottom up, including the possibility of retrieving the expander and tool through the previously expanded tubular. The ability to close off and control the annulus outside the tubular if the well commences to flow during tubular expansion is obtained with top-down expansion, but is not available with bottom-up expansion.
A significant advantage of the tool as disclosed herein is that fluid pressure does not act directly upon the expander to cause the expansion operation. More importantly, in the event that one of the threaded joints in the expanded liner leaks, this leakage will not inhibit the continued expansion of the liner, which is a significant advantage compared to prior art systems which rely upon fluid pressure directly acting on the expander to move the expander.
The arrangement of the components according to the present invention positions the hydraulic power source, which per the disclosed embodiments is a plurality of inner and outer pistons, above the expander, and then positions the anchor below the expander. Also, this design includes a telescopic joint within the tool, while such a joint is not required according to the prior art tools of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,225,880.
Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein in some detail, this has been done solely for the purposes of explaining the various aspects of the invention, and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention as defined in the claims which follow. Those skilled in the art will understand that the embodiment shown and described is exemplary, and various other substitutions, alterations and modifications, including but not limited to those design alternatives specifically discussed herein, may be made in the practice of the invention without departing from its scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1815376 | Jones | Jul 1931 | A |
2021223 | Church | Nov 1935 | A |
2328840 | O'Leary | Sep 1943 | A |
2589337 | Burns | Mar 1952 | A |
3889766 | Sutliff et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
4497367 | Stevenson | Feb 1985 | A |
4562889 | Braddick | Jan 1986 | A |
4603743 | Lindsey, Jr. | Aug 1986 | A |
5222555 | Bridges | Jun 1993 | A |
5417288 | Melenyzer et al. | May 1995 | A |
6622789 | Braddick | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631759 | Cook et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6681860 | Yokley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6705395 | Cook et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6722427 | Gano et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6722441 | Lauritzen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6763893 | Braddick | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6814143 | Braddick | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820687 | Maguire et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6857473 | Cook et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6892819 | Cook et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6976541 | Brisco et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6991040 | Hill et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7017670 | Hazel et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021390 | Cook et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7028780 | Maguire | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7055608 | Cook et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7077211 | Cook et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7086477 | Duggan | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090005 | Smith et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117940 | Campo | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140442 | Mackay et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7172025 | Eckerlin | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7172027 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7225880 | Braddick | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7278492 | Braddick | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7823659 | Costa et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7958941 | Hueston et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8066078 | Braddick | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069916 | Giroux et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8100188 | Watson | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8132627 | Braddick | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20010020532 | Baugh et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20030102127 | Braddick | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121655 | Lauritzen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030196818 | Lynde et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040016544 | Braddick | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040050590 | Pirovolou et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055758 | Brezinski et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055786 | Maguire et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040129431 | Jackson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040149442 | Mackenzie | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040216894 | Maguire | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040231855 | Cook et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050056433 | Ring et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050092485 | Brezinski et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050161213 | Sonnier et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050263292 | Braddick | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050263294 | Braddick | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060124295 | Maguire | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156776 | Yablochnikov | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070029095 | Brisco et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070114044 | Brezinski et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080156499 | Giroux et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080257560 | Brisco et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277111 | Braddick | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090242213 | Braddick | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100155082 | Braddick | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110132623 | Moeller | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110186288 | Braddick | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110168411 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |