This invention relates to bore liner, and in particular to expandable bore liner.
Recent developments in the oil and gas exploration and extraction industries have included the provision of expandable bore-lining tubing. One such system proposes expandable bore liner being run into a section of open hole, below a cased section of bore, such that the upper end of the liner overlaps with the lower end of the existing casing, as described in GB 2 344 606 A. The lower end of the liner is anchored in the bore, and cement slurry is circulated into the annulus between the liner and the bore wall, displaced fluid from the annulus passing through the gap between the lower end of the casing and the upper end of the unexpanded liner. The liner is run into the bore with an expansion cone or swage located at the lower end of the liner and, once the cement slurry is in place, the expansion cone is urged upwardly through the liner, by supplying hydraulic fluid at an elevated pressure behind the cone. This expands the liner to a larger inner and outer diameter, and brings the outer face of the upper end of the liner into contact with the inner face of the lower end of the casing. The cement then cures, sealing and securing the expanded liner in the bore.
There are however a number of potential difficulties associated with this proposal. Firstly, as cementation takes place prior to expansion, there is a risk that the cement will set before expansion has been initiated or completed.
Further, the expansion cone moves upwardly from the lower end of the liner, such that any expansion problems may result in the cone becoming stuck part way through the liner. Access to remedy the problem is then restricted by the presence of the cone and the smaller diameter unexpanded liner above the cone.
Circumferential expansion of the liner using a cone results in axial shrinkage of the liner. Thus, difficulties may be experienced if the liner becomes differentially stuck in the bore, that is if there is a differential pressure between the bore and a formation intersected by the bore, and this pressure differential acts on the liner to hold the liner against a portion of the bore wall. The axial shrinkage of the liner will thus be resisted between the differentially stuck portion of the liner and the anchor at the lower end of the liner. This may result in the liner breaking, or in the expansion process being curtailed with the cone only part-way through the liner.
The use of pressure to urge the cone through the liner relies upon the maintenance of pressure integrity below the cone. Connections between liner sections will be subject to expansion, and should a connection leak following expansion, the expansion process may be hindered or halted. Furthermore, a sudden failure of a connection may expose the surrounding formation to undesirable elevated pressure, potentially damaging the formation and impacting on its production capabilities. Furthermore, if the formation is fractured, there may a loss of fluid into the formation, with the associated expense and inconvenience, and potential for damage to the formation.
Furthermore, the use of hydraulic pressure to urge the cone upwardly through the liner relies upon the provision of a pressure-tight seal between the cone and the liner, and thus requires the liner to conform to tight tolerances on the liner internal diameter, wall thickness and roundness. These tolerances are much tighter than standard API specifications, and consequently make manufacture of such liner relatively expensive.
Finally, when expanding a liner overlapping an existing casing utilising a cone or swage it is only possible to expand the liner to a diameter smaller than the casing, such that any further sections of liner must be of still smaller diameter.
It is among the objectives of embodiments of the present invention to obviate or mitigate these and other disadvantages of existing liner expansion proposals.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of lining a drilled bore, the method comprising:
Expanding the first tubular prior to cementation avoids any problems relating to the cement setting prior to expansion. Furthermore, as the expansion is carried out “top down”, if any difficulties are experienced the expansion device is relatively easily accessed.
In other aspects of the invention it is not necessary to cement the liner in place, for example the liner may be expanded to conform to the surrounding bore wall, or the liner may carry or be provided with a sleeve of deformable or expanding material, such as an elastomer which may be formulated to swell on exposure to selected fluids or temperatures.
Preferably, the first tubular is expanded by rotary or rolling expansion, that is an expansion device featuring one or more rotatable expansion members, the device being rotated within the tubular as the device is axially advanced there through. Examples or such rotary expansion devices are described in applicant's WO00\37766 and U.S. Ser. No. 09\469,690, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Such expansion devices operate using a different expansion mechanism than cones and swages, that is by reducing the wall thickness of the tubular and thus increasing the diameter of the tubular, rather than simple circumferential extension of the tubular wall. Such devices may be controlled to limit the degree of axial shrinkage or contraction of the tubular during expansion, and thus the impact of any differential sticking is reduced, and the different yield mechanism of rotary expansion is also better able to accommodate localised differential sticking. The rotary expansion device may be compliant, that is be capable of expanding a variable diameter, or of fixed diameter. However, in certain embodiments of the invention, expansion cones or swages may still be utilised to expand the first tubular, or an axial compliant expander may be utilised, such as the tool sold under the ACE trade mark by the applicant, or the tool as described in the PCT and United States patent applications filed on 30 Nov. 2002, based on applicant's UK patent application 0128667.3.
The first tubular may be expanded by a combination of mechanical and hydraulic means, as described in applicant's PCT patent application WO02\081863.
Preferably, the upper end of the first tubular is expanded to an internal diameter sufficient such that there is little or no reduction in internal diameter between the second tubular and the expanded first tubular. This may be achieved in a number of ways. The lower end portion of the second tubular may describe a larger diameter than an upper portion of the tubular, to create a “bell-end” or the like, such that the first tubular may be expanded into the bell-end. Alternatively, the upper end of the first tubular may be expanded within the lower end of the second tubular and induce expansion and deformation of the second tubular.
Preferably, the upper end of the first tubular is expanded to secure the upper end of the first tubular relative to the lower end of the second tubular. Most preferably, the upper end of the first tubular is further extended to seal the upper end of the first tubular to the lower end of the second tubular.
The lower end of the first tubular may be expanded to a larger internal diameter, to accommodate the upper end of a subsequent tubular.
Preferably, the first tubular is liner and the second tubular is casing.
These and other aspects of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Reference is first made to
The setting tool 22 includes a fluid pressure actuated compliant rolling expansion device 23 which is rotatably coupled to the string 20 but which is rotatable relative to the setting tool 22 and liner 18. When actuated and rotated, the expansion device 23 extends at least a portion of the upper end of the liner 18 into contact with the casing end section 16, thus providing an anchor 24 for the liner 18. An axial push and pull is then applied to the tool 22 from surface to ensure that the liner 18 is firmly anchored to the casing 14. The setting tool 22 is then released from the now anchored liner 18 and the compliant rolling expansion device 23 utilised to expand the section of liner 18 above the anchor 24, to locate the liner 18 more securely relative to the casing 14. At this stage, an elastomeric seal sleeve 35 below the anchor 24 remains inactive, and a number of fluid ports 27 in the liner remain open to allow fluid to pass from the annulus 26 between the liner 18 and the bore wall between the overlapping ends of the casing 14 and liner 18.
Next, as illustrated in
The lower end of the liner 18 is provided with an expandable drillable float shoe 28, of a suitable material such a composite or aluminium alloy. The shoe 28 incorporates a float collar with a flapper valve, and the check valves normally found in a shoe. On the setting tool 22 encountering the float shoe 28, a sealed connection is formed with the float collar, the flapper valve is opened and a cement port in the setting tool 22 is opened, such that cement slurry may be pumped down the running string 20, through the setting tool 22, through the float shoe 28, and into the annulus 26, as illustrated in
Once cementation is completed, the setting tool 22, with the compliant expansion device 23 retracted, is pulled out of the lower end of the expanded liner 18 and the flapper valve in the float shoe closes. Cleaning fluid is then circulated through the liner 18 and casing 14, via the tool 22, to clean out any remaining cement residue. The compliant expansion device 23 is then pulled out until the device 23 is located adjacent the liner seal 35. The expansion device 23 is then actuated to further expand the upper end of the liner 18 into contact with the surrounding casing 14 to activate the seal 35 and close the liner flow ports 27, and thus form a fluid seal between the liner 18 and the casing 14. The setting tool 22 is then pulled out of the bore 10.
As noted above, in this embodiment the casing 14 is provided with a larger diameter lower end section 16, into which the upper end of the liner 18 is expanded, such that the expanded liner 18 has the same internal diameter as the casing 14. For example, 7 inch liner 18 may be run through a 9 inch casing 14. The 7 inch liner 18 may then be expanded to provide the same internal dimensions as the 9 inch liner.
Reference is now made to
The upper end of the tool 22 extends above the upper end of the liner 18 and features a location device in the form of a spring-loaded latch 50 which is shaped to locate in a profile (not shown) provided in the lower end of the casing 14. This serves to indicate when the tool 22, and thus the liner 18, has been correctly located relative to the casing 14; once the latch 50 has engaged the casing profile, an over-pull or additional weight is required to dislodge the latch 50 from the profile. The correct location of the tool 22 and the liner 18 in the casing 14 is important as, for example, if the overlap between the liner 18 and casing 14 is not as intended, it may not be possible to fully expand the liner 18, leaving a restriction in the liner bore. Of course the location device may take other forms, and may utilise sensors relaying signals to surface rather than relying on mechanical engagement.
Below the latch 50 is the fixed diameter expansion tool 25, which in this example features three rollers 52 mounted on inclined spindles. Mounted below the expansion tool 25 are a pair of torque anchors 56, 58, which are rotatably fixed relative to the arrangement for supporting the liner on the tool 22 (
The liner-supporting dogs 60 initially extend through windows 64 in the upper end of the liner 18, which will form the liner hanger. The dogs 60 may be released by application of an over-pressure within the tool 22. In this example such an over-pressure shears a disc which then creates an impulse pressure on a dog-supporting sleeve, to move the sleeve to a position in which the dogs may radially retract. However, in other embodiments the dogs may be released by some other means, for example by rotating the tool 22 to the left relative to the anchored liner 18.
The liner-supporting dogs 60 and the torque anchors 56, 58 operate in concert when the compliant expansion device 23 (
Following release of the dogs 60, by application of an over-pressure following activation of the anchor, the rollers 62 allow the actuated anchors 56, 58 to move upwardly relative to the casing 14 as the activated device 23 is utilised to expand the liner 18 above the anchor 24.
A cement stinger 70 (
Following cementation and cleaning, as described above, the compliant expansion tool 23 is utilised to further expand the upper end of the liner, and in particular to activate the seal 35 and close the liner flow ports 27. This follows the tool 22 being accurately located relative the upper end of the liner 18 and the casing 14 by means of the latch 50.
Reference is now made to
In other embodiments, the lower end of the casing may be subject to little if any expansion, such that there is a small loss of diameter at the liner top.
Reference is now made to
In other embodiments of the invention the cementation step may not be required, for example when the liner is provided with an elastomer on its outer face, which elastomer may be formulated to swell on contact with certain fluids to fill the annulus between the expanded liner and the bore wall. In still further embodiments, the cementation may be carried in stages, particularly when the liner is relatively long. In such a situation the expansion may also be carried out in stages, that is a section of liner is expanded and then cemented, and this process is then repeated as many times as is necessary for subsequent sections. Fluid circulation between the annulus and an intermediate section of the liner may be achieved by providing flow ports at appropriate points in the liner, which ports are adapted to be closed on expansion of the liner to a predetermined degree. In one embodiment, an exterior sleeve 33 is provided around the ports 27, allowing fluid to flow through the ports. However, when the liner is expanded the liner is brought into contact with the sleeve 33 and the sleeve closes the ports.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0130849.3 | Dec 2001 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
761518 | Lykken | May 1904 | A |
1233888 | Leonard | Jul 1917 | A |
1324303 | Carmichael | Dec 1919 | A |
1545039 | Deavers | Jul 1925 | A |
1561418 | Duda | Nov 1925 | A |
1569729 | Duda | Jan 1926 | A |
1597212 | Spengler | Aug 1926 | A |
1880218 | Simmons | Oct 1932 | A |
1930825 | Raymond | Oct 1933 | A |
2383214 | Prout | Aug 1945 | A |
2499630 | Clark | Mar 1950 | A |
2627891 | Clark | Feb 1953 | A |
2663073 | Bieber et al. | Dec 1953 | A |
2734580 | Layne | Feb 1956 | A |
2898971 | Hempel | Sep 1959 | A |
3087546 | Wooley | Apr 1963 | A |
3188850 | Linthicum et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3195646 | Brown | Jul 1965 | A |
3353599 | Swift | Nov 1967 | A |
3412565 | Lindsey et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3467180 | Pensotti | Sep 1969 | A |
3529667 | Malone | Sep 1970 | A |
3669190 | Sizer et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3785193 | Kinley et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3818734 | Bateman | Jun 1974 | A |
3911707 | Minakov et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4069573 | Rogers, Jr. et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4127168 | Hanson et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4159564 | Cooper, Jr. | Jul 1979 | A |
4288082 | Setterberg, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
4311194 | White | Jan 1982 | A |
4324407 | Upham et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4393931 | Muse et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4429620 | Burkhardt et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4531581 | Pringle et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4588030 | Blizzard | May 1986 | A |
4697640 | Szarka | Oct 1987 | A |
4848462 | Allwin | Jul 1989 | A |
4848469 | Baugh et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4862966 | Lindsey et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5014779 | Meling et al. | May 1991 | A |
5027894 | Coone et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5048612 | Cochran | Sep 1991 | A |
5083608 | Abdrakhmanov et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5086845 | Baugh | Feb 1992 | A |
5181570 | Allwin et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5220959 | Vance, Sr. | Jun 1993 | A |
5228959 | Vance, Sr. | Jul 1993 | A |
5271472 | Leturno | Dec 1993 | A |
5297633 | Snider et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5409059 | McHardy | Apr 1995 | A |
5435400 | Smith | Jul 1995 | A |
5467826 | Miller | Nov 1995 | A |
5472057 | Winfree | Dec 1995 | A |
5494106 | Gueguen et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5560426 | Trahan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5685369 | Ellis et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695008 | Bertet et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5785120 | Smalley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5833001 | Song et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5901787 | Boyle | May 1999 | A |
5918677 | Head | Jul 1999 | A |
6021850 | Wood et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6056536 | Schad et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065536 | Gudmestad et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073692 | Wood et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085838 | Vercaemer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098717 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6253850 | Nazzai et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6321847 | Brown | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325148 | Trahan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6352112 | Mills | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6425444 | Metcalfe et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431282 | Bosma et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446323 | Metcalfe et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446724 | Baugh et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454013 | Metcalfe | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457532 | Simpson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6457533 | Metcalfe | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6497289 | Cook et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6527049 | Metcalfe et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543552 | Metcalfe et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6543816 | Noel | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6578630 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6598677 | Baugh et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6648075 | Badrak et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662876 | Lauritzen | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6702029 | Metcalfe et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6712401 | Coulon et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6742606 | Metcalfe et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
20010020532 | Baugh et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20030047320 | Badrak et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030127774 | Stephenson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030183395 | Jones | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040031530 | Duggan | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055754 | MacKay et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040123983 | Cook et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050000697 | Simpson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023001 | Hillis | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060054330 | Ring et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2356130 | Jun 2000 | CA |
0 961 007 | Dec 1999 | EP |
2 320 734 | Jul 1998 | GB |
2 326 896 | Jan 1999 | GB |
2 344 606 | Jun 2000 | GB |
2 344 606 | Jun 2000 | GB |
2 345 308 | Jul 2000 | GB |
2 347 950 | Sep 2000 | GB |
2 347 952 | Sep 2000 | GB |
2350137 | Nov 2000 | GB |
2 382 605 | Jun 2003 | GB |
9325799 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9324728 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9706346 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9918328 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9923354 | May 1999 | WO |
9935368 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0037766 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0225056 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 02081863 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03006788 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030127225 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |