The present invention relates to a tufting machine and a method of operating the tufting machine. In particular, it is directed to a tufting machine and a method with enhanced control of the yarn feed in order to provide a more uniform pile height.
A uniform pile height is desirable in tufting machines as it allows the tufting machine to produce a carpet which is as avoids the formation of unduly short tufts which then become essentially invisible in the finished carpet.
The invention applies in particular, to a tufting machine as defined by the pre-characterising clause of claim 1.
Such a machine has a sliding needle bar which will slide laterally with respect to a tufting direction in which a backing medium is fed through the tufting region. The machine also has a stitch selection mechanism which means that, as the sliding needle bar slides across the backing medium, a controller may determine when the tuft presented by a particular needle is required by the pattern data at that position and uses that to form a tuft, while any needles which carry a colour not required by the pattern data at that position are not used for the tuft.
Such stich selection mechanisms are well known in the art and broadly fall into two categories.
Firstly, in a more traditional tufting machine, this is done by controlling the yarn tension. If a yarn of a non-required colour is presented to the backing medium, the needle carrying that yarn penetrates the backing medium and forms a tuft as usual. However, the yarn tension is briefly increased such that the tuft is either pulled out of the backing medium or is pulled low such that the tuft that it produces is not visible in the finished carpet.
The second approach is an individual needle control (ICN) machine such as that disclosed in GB2242914 and GB2385604. In these machines, the needle for a non-selected colour is not driven into the backing medium. Instead, the individual need (or group of needles) are latchable with respect to the needle bar. If the colour presented by a particular needle is not required for the pattern, the stitch selection mechanism simply does not operate the associated latching mechanism such that the needle is not latched to the needle bar and is therefore not reciprocated as the needle bar reciprocates. If the yarn is required by the pattern, the associated latch operates to couple the needle to the needle bar to allow the needle to provide a tuft.
The present invention is applicable to either type of stich selection mechanism.
A problem with these stitch selection mechanisms is that in between each location where a particular needle is required to form a tuft, the yarn extends across the back side of the backing medium. The sliding medium bar extends across a significant number of needle pitches such that there each back stitch extends to a considerable lateral extent, particularly where the yarn is not required in the pattern for some considerable distance. Further, there are typically somewhere between 2-6 different colours of needles of yarn involved in the pattern and all of these extend in different directions on the back stitch such that entanglement of the yarn is a common phenomenon leading to the back surface of the carpet looking extremely messy. This is not a problem in itself as the carpet is subsequently coated. However, this leads to other difficulties. In particular, the amount of yarn required for the back stitch stitch as calculated on the basis that there is a direct path between two adjacent tufts created by each respective needle. If a yarn is entangled, it is effectively anchored at a point off of the direct path and this will lengthen the path of the back stitch. However, because the amount of yarn fed is calculated based on the direct path, this means that there is a short fall in the yarn feed. As a result of this, the next tuft produced following a point of entanglement will be short by an amount approximately equivalent to half of the additional amount of yarn required to produce the back stitch for the entangled yarn. This will not be visible, or will at least be hard to see in the finished carpet.
As mentioned above, in a traditional tufting machine, the yarn for an non-required colour is either pulled out of the backing or is pulled low. Where the yarn is pulled low but not out of the backing medium for all stitches, the problem of entanglement does not arise as the yarn is anchored to the backing medium at each stitch position. However, where a significant proportion of the yarns are pulled out of the backing medium, the problem of entanglement arises as this forms “tails” of unattached yarn on the back side of the back of the backing medium. This is also a problem for the above mentioned ICN machines with the latching mechanism as these will form the same type of tails as a traditional machine will where all of the yarns are pulled out of the backing medium.
According to the present invention, such a tufting machine is characterised by the characterising features of claim 1.
The present invention takes a different approach in that it actively determine where a point of entanglement will occur and then takes this into account in the yarn feed.
As a first iteration, the controller may be arranged to calculate the points of entanglement based on the assumption that the path of each yarn from one tuft formed by a respective needle to an adjacent tuft formed by the same needle is the straight path. However, once this first iteration has been carried out and the points of entanglement have been calculated, a controller may then carry out a second iteration of the calculation taking into account that the yarn path from the tuft formed by one needle to an adjacent tuft formed by the same needle is deflected by virtue of the point of entanglement and may calculate further points of entanglement based on this non-straight path. Providing just the first iteration significantly improves upon the prior art where no compensation is provided for the points of entanglement such that this second iteration may not be necessary in practice.
Third and subsequent iterations may also be carried out but each iteration will generate a significant increase in the processing power required and the level of additional accuracy provided between the second and subsequent iterations diminishes rapidly with each further iteration.
A tufting machine and method for operating a tufting machine will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
A tufting machine according to the present invention is shown in
The tufting machine 1 is based on an individual needle control (ICN) machine as such as a ColorTec.
In particular, it comprises a rear 5 and front 6 backing feed mechanisms to feed a backing medium 7 through the tufting machine. Beneath the backing material are a series of gauge parts including a series of hooks 8 and knives 9 which are arranged across the tufting machine in a direction perpendicular to the plane of
In such a machine, the needle bar 11 is reciprocated to form tufts and is moved laterally to selectively align needles with different coloured yarns at a particular position. A controller receives pattern data and, when a needle with the colour demanded by the pattern is in the appropriate position, the latching mechanism 12 will operate to couple that needle 10 to the needle bar 11 such that, as the needle bar reciprocates, the yarn is driven through the backing medium 7. The loop of yarn formed by that needle is picked up by the adjacent hook 8 to form a loop of yarn which is then cut by the knife 9 in order to form a cut pile carpet. This is how a conventional ICN machine operates. The machine may also be provided with a looper in place of the hook 8 and with no knife in order to produce a loop pile carpet, although ICN machines are not generally used in this way.
As described so far, the ICN is a known arrangement. In a conventional ICN machine a yarn latch is associated with each needle to pull the yarn down with a selected needle. The present invention applies to such a conventional ICN machine. However, it also applies to a modified ICN machine as shown in
Instead of providing latches on the needles to pull the yarn down, the yarn in the modified ICN machine is fed by an actively driven yarn feed mechanism 2. This comprises a series of server motors 20 each of which feeds an individual yarn 21 to a respective needle. As shown in
In some situations described below, it is necessary to operate the servo motors 20 in reverse. This can create slack yarn between the creel 30 and the yarn feed mechanism 2. If the slack reaches unacceptable levels, a compensation system 31 can be provided between the creel 30 and yarn feed mechanisms 2. This is in the form of a weight for each of the yarns which will effectively hang from the yarn and hence take up any slack if the respective servo motor 20 is driven in reverse.
This will now be described with reference to
By complete contrast, in
The above yarn feed profiles provides a superposition of the yarn feed needed to compensate for the backing stitch and the yarn feed needed to form the pile height with the desired height. This is done by concentrating the yarn feed in the first half of the cycle as described above. This provides a benefit that the yarn remains more stretched during the entire stitch cycle and slack can be avoided.
The above description relates to a modified ICN machine and the manner in which the yarn is fed to such a machine. This is the subject of GB 1720794.5. As mentioned above, the present invention is also applicable to a conventional ICN machine. It is also applicable to a conventional tufting machine which uses the control of yarn tension rather than a latching mechanism to selectively produce each tuft. In all cases, on the back side of the backing medium, the yarns follow a complex path and will frequently become entangled. The manner in which this is dealt with will now be described with reference to
Before describing the new yarn feed in detail, the nomenclature being used in
The figures essentially represent a schematic plan of the backing medium 7. The backing medium 7 is fed through the tufting machine the direction B. The needle bar 11 (not shown in
In the drawings, each different yarn is shown with different shading. For the purposes of this explanation, the colours described will be referred to as red 200 depicted by vertical shading, yellow 201 depicted by cross-hatched shading, blue 202 depicted by continuous shading and white 203 depicted by the absence of shading. It will be understood, however, that any colours can be used. Further, although four separate colours are described, the colours may be present in any permutation such that they may, for example, be a group comprising two yarns of the same colour and two further yarns of each of a different colour. Such needle threading arrangements are well known in the art and will not be described further here.
With reference to
The needle bar starts in the position R1 shown on the left hand side of
On the first stroke of the needle bar 11, the above mentioned colours are presented at the above mentioned positions. In the case of an ICN machine, if that particular colour is required at that particular position, its needle is latched to the needle bar and the needle penetrates the backing medium 7 to form a tuft of the appropriate colour. In the case of a traditional tufting machine, all of the needles penetrate the backing medium 7, but if the colour is not required, the yarn tension is increased to pull an unwanted colour out of the backing medium 7.
Having made the first stroke, the backing medium 7 is advanced so that the needle bar lines up with position R2. At the same time, the needle bar moves one position to the right following the path depicted by the dotted lines in
The needle bar makes its final step to the right so that, for example, the needle with the red yarn 200 that began at position P1 moves to position P5. The needle bar then reverses and moves four steps to the left following the line 210 in
Having described the notation used in
Thus, the pattern data calls for a blue yarn 203 at position P4 of row D1, a white yarn at position P5 of row D1 and a blue yarn at position P6 of row D1. White yarns are also required in position P5 for rows D2, D3 and D4 while a blue yarn is required in position P6 of row D3.
As can be seen, for example, from
With reference to
At row R2, the needles at position P4 and P5 are selected to form tufts such that a blue tuft 202 is formed at position P4 and a white tuft 203 is formed at position P5. The needle bar then moves to row R3 where no tufts of significance to this explanation are formed and subsequently onto positon R4 where a blue tuft is formed at position P6. As a result of this, the path 220 shown in a bold line in
The needle bar follows the zigzag paths 211 and 212 through a successive position R5 to R7 without forming any further tufts.
The next tuft on note is formed in position R8 by the needle with the white yarn 203 as depicted in
While this is going on, the needle for the blue yarn follows the zigzag path 211 while the blue yarn itself on the backside of the backing medium is anchored at position P6, R4, which is then dragged to the left as shown in
From this point of entanglement E1, the blue yarn then follows the unattached path 227 which swings around as shown in
In
Finally, in relation to
If the blue yarn had not become entangled at the point E1, the blue yarn path on the backside of the backing medium would have been straight line from position P6, R4 to position P6, R12 as depicted by the dotted line 230 in
Similarly, for the white yarn, the path of yarn if it had not become entangled is a straight path from P5, R10 to P5 to R16 as depicted by line 231. Again, the additional yarn required is calculated as the length of the path 228 plus path 239 minus path 231.
The same calculation is repeated from all yarn at all positions and the yarn feed mechanism is then instructed by the controller to feed additional yarn based on this calculation.
The described example includes only one point of entanglement between adjacent tufts. It is perfectly possibly for there to be two or more such points of entanglement. Under these circumstances, it is simply a matter of adding together the path between the two tufts via all points of entanglement and is subtracting the length of the direct path between the two tufts to determine the additional yarn required.
In practice, the controller first determines whether a tuft is formed at a particular position. If it is, there is no need for the controller to determine whether there are any points of entanglement of the yarn. It is only when the controller determines that a tuft is not formed at a particular positon that it then needs to determine whether additional yarn is required to take into account any points of entanglement. In doing so, if the needle bar is moving to the left, the controller needs to check the path of all colours to the right that potentially cross the path of the yarn in question. Similarly, if the needle bar is going to the right the controller needs to check the paths of the yarn to the left. This simplifies the amount of calculations that are required.
As described above, the method is carried out on the assumption that each yarn follows the zigzag paths 210 to 212 as described by the needle bar. However, once a yarn is entangled, it is caused to follow a different path from its associated needle than it would had it not been trapped. As a result of this deviation, each yarn may entangle other yarns in the manner which is different from the manner in which it would have done had it not become entangled. Having calculated the path of the tangled yarn, the software may perform a second iteration of calculations using the newly calculated tangled yarn path instead of the previously used ideal yarn path in order to provide a more accurate calculation of the yarn entanglement. However, this may not be necessary as the first approximation described above may provide sufficient accuracy that this makes no difference in practice to the finished carpet. On the other hand, second and subsequent iteration could be provided to provide further accuracy. Ultimately this is a trade-off between processing power and the degree of accuracy of the tuft length required in the final carpet.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1720794 | Dec 2017 | GB | national |
1800486 | Jan 2018 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/083875 | 12/6/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/115362 | 6/20/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20030140830 | Pokrishevsky et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20090205547 | Hall | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090260554 | Hall | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20140283724 | Frost et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160069010 | Frost et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170204546 | Padgett et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
The Search Report prepared by the Intellectual Property Office of Great Britain dated Jul. 11, 2018 for priority patent application No. GB1800486.1; 3 pages. |
The International Search Report prepared by the European Patent Office as International Search Authority dated Feb. 18, 2019 for the parent PCT application, PCT/EP2018/083875; 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210180230 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |