This invention relates generally to inductance tuning, and more particularly, to switched-inductance tuning.
Inductance tuning may be used in many different applications, such as to provide frequency tuning in microwave communications. For example, a magnetically-coupled tunable inductor for variable frequency oscillators may be used to tune the frequency of a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) within radio-frequency (RF) communication devices, such as switching between different frequency bands in a multi-band or multi-mode wireless transceiver. For a fully integrated VCO a tunable LC resonator may be provided as part of an RF integrated circuit to improve performance of a communication device using magnetically coupled inductance tuning. The VCO then operates to provide, for example, frequency translation based on the tuning of the VCO. Accordingly, fine tuning at different frequency bands is important for proper communication.
Conventional inductance tuning methods include using active inductors where the inductors are tuned using amplifiers with feedback. Other conventional inductance tuning methods include biasing transistors to present a positive reactance to a circuit. At microwave frequencies, the small sizes of the devices providing the inductive tuning makes the conventional methods very sensitive to variations, for example, in the manufacturing process. Moreover, the requirement for direct current (DC) bias is inefficient and is also the source of high-noise injection to the circuit, thereby degrading performance. Accordingly, these conventional inductance tuning methods are suitable for low-frequency applications, but typically not for higher frequency VCO applications.
For higher frequency VCO applications, a switched inductor arrangement is typically used. The inductors may be connected in series or parallel and switches are used to short one or more of the inductors to achieve inductance tuning. These switched arrangements can result in wasteful or inefficient use of circuit area and can make circuit layout difficult. Additionally, it can be difficult to make small or incremental changes to the inductors reactance.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, a tunable inductor is provided that includes a transformer having a primary winding and a secondary winding and a switch connected to the secondary winding of the transformer. The transformer is capacitively loaded with at least one capacitor connected to the secondary winding of the transformer with the switch.
In accordance with another exemplary embodiment, a tunable transformer is provided that includes a primary coil having a self-inductance L1. The tunable transformer further includes a secondary coil having a self-inductance L2. An effective inductance is defined by the inductance on the primary coil with the secondary coil loaded with the combination of a capacitor and a switch.
In accordance with yet another exemplary embodiment, a method of tuning a transformer using capacitive loading is provided. The method includes connecting at least one capacitor to a secondary winding of the transformer and providing a switch to connect and disconnect the at least one capacitor from the secondary winding of the transformer to provide a switched inductance.
For simplicity and ease of explanation, the invention will be described herein in connection with various embodiments thereof. Those skilled in the art will recognize, however, that the features and advantages of the various embodiments may be implemented in a variety of configurations. It is to be understood, therefore, that the embodiments described herein are presented by way of illustration, not of limitation.
As used herein, an element or step recited in the singular and proceeded with the word “a” or “an” should be understood as not excluding plural said elements or steps, unless such exclusion is explicitly stated. Furthermore, references to “one embodiment” of the present invention are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features. Moreover, unless explicitly stated to the contrary, embodiments “comprising” or “having” an element or a plurality of elements having a particular property may include additional such elements not having that property. Additionally, the arrangement and configuration of the various components described herein may be modified or change, for example, replacing certain components with other components or changing the order or relative positions of the components.
Various embodiments of the present invention provide a tunable inductance arrangement having a tunable transformer wherein the mutual inductance to a second inductor (e.g., secondary winding) of the transformer is controlled using one or more switches on the second inductor of the transformer. The one or more switches switch the second inductor in and out of the transformer along with one or more capacitors connected to the secondary winding of the transformer.
Specifically, and as shown in
Referring again to
In operation, the mutual inductance to the secondary winding 26 is controlled using the switch 32 connected to the secondary winding 26. In particular, when the switch 32 is in an off state such that an open loop arrangement is provided for the secondary winding 26, there is no induced current on the secondary inductor 30 and the effective inductance (Leff) of the tunable inductor 20 is primarily the inductance from the primary inductor 28. When the switch 32 is in an on state such that a closed loop arrangement is provided for the secondary winding 26, current is induced or flowing through the secondary inductor 30 due to the induced magnetic field and results in a mutual inductance Lmu between the first and second inductors 28 and 30. Accordingly, current flowing through the primary and secondary windings 24 and 26 provides an effective mutual inductance Lmu therebetween (i.e., between the first and second inductors 28 and 30). Thus, the Leff becomes and is defined as follows:
Leff=L1+Lmu Equation 1
Thus, when the switch 32 is in an off state, an open-circuit results in the secondary winding 26 wherein the effective inductance is defined as follows, which is the primary coil self-inductance:
Leff=(L1−Lm)+Lm=L1 Equation 2
When the switch is in an on state, a short circuit results in the secondary winding 26. The equivalent circuit for the transformer 22 is shown in
Referring now to
Leff=(L1−Lm)+LM>L1 Equation 3
Therefore, when the switch 32 is in the on state, the resultant inductance, Leff, is larger than L1. Thus, in operation, the coupling capacitor (C1) 34 allows the various embodiments to achieve an inductance larger than L1.
In operation, with a larger L, when a typical switch is in the on state, the switch introduces some extra loss due to the use of the switch. This loss will generally degrade the quality factor of the inductor. The quality factor of the inductor can be estimated as Q=jwL/R, if the inductor is treated as a lossless inductor L with a series resistor R. Therefore, turning on the switch will increase R, and if at the same time, L becomes smaller, which is the case when there is no capacitor used, then the Q is reduced. However, in the various embodiments, when turning on the switch 32, the L increases, and R increases a little, but the Q of the inductor can remain relatively constant.
It should be noted that the tunable inductor 20 also may be modified to allow the inductance to be varied in different increments, for example, by changing the number of capacitors 34 and corresponding switches 32 as shown in
The various embodiments of a tunable inductor 20 may form part of a voltage controller oscillator (VCO) 50 as shown in
The VCO 50 is shown in more detail in
It should be noted that although the VCO 50 is described in connection with the PLL 52 shown in
Referring again to
In a dual-band VCO design as shown in
The layout of the transformer 22 allows the tunable inductor 20 to be formed in a compact footprint, for example, having the dimensions of a typical on-chip inductor. Moreover, requirements on the loss of the switch 32 can be relatively reduced as the switch 32 only affects the tunable inductor 20 through the capacitors 34 and the coupling of the transformer 22. The various embodiments also allow greater flexibility in the design of the tunable inductor 20 in that the self-inductance of L2, the coupling coefficient of the transformer 22, the capacitance of the capacitors 34 (coupling capacitors) and the sizes of the switches 32 can be more easily varied for specific applications.
It should be noted that modifications and variations to the various embodiments are contemplated. For example, the number, relative positioning and operating parameters of the various components may be modified based on the particular application, use, etc. The modification may be based on, for example, different desired or required operating characteristics.
It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. For example, the above-described embodiments (and/or aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from its scope. While the dimensions and types of materials described herein are intended to define the parameters of the invention, they are by no means limiting and are exemplary embodiments. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects. Further, the limitations of the following claims are not written in means-plus-function format and are not intended to be interpreted based on 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph, unless and until such claim limitations expressly use the phrase “means for” followed by a statement of function void of further structure.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.