Patent Application
20220207403
Tunable couplers for superconducting qubits, once a longterm investment in future quantum computers and a direction towards improving two-qubit gate fidelities are now a center-piece of large qubit arrays. The recent quantum supremacy demonstration owes its success in part to the twoqubit gate fidelities across the chip facilitated by fast, tunable couplers. Frequently realized as a mutual inductance or effective capacitance between nearest-neighbor qubits and tuned by flux-biased superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), these couplers naturally integrate with both fixed and flux-tunable superconducting qubits.
Recent advancements in semiconductor-superconductor junctions as gate-tunable Josephson junctions have led to new proposals and realizations of coupling schemes to superconducting storage units and readout buses. Unlike their transmon counterparts, these hybrid systems employ various III-V semiconductor materials with properties tunable in both fabrication and with external electric fields as opposed to the canonical, fixed fabrication Al/Al2O3 and Nb-based device stacks that rely on external current sources for tuning.
As with prior attempts to improve coherence with new materials, there are challenges in realizing high coherence gatemon qubits, where an applied electric potential depletes a superconductor-semiconductor-superconductor junction. Recent dielectric loss studies of III-V materials, specifically Al/GaAs/Al trilayers, suggest that the piezoelectricity of GaAs can contribute to higher losses compared to sapphire or silicon substrates. Apart from the aforementioned experimental results for GaAs, there have been no other studies that have measured the loss in III-V materials at single photon powers and millikelvin temperatures. A solution that addresses both the issue of realizing a fast, tunable coupler and quantifying its potential as an additional source of dielectric loss has proven difficult.
This disclosure includes examples of a tunable coupler to control interactions between solid-state qubits, including interactions between solid-sate qubits in a single, two-dimensional (2D) layer, interactions between three-dimensional (3D) cavities, or any combination thereof . . In some examples, the solid-state qubits may include superconducting qubit, quantum-dot qubits, flux-qubits, 3D cavities, or any other type of solid-state qubits. The tunable coupler may include a capacitor with source and drain terminals each connected to a respective qubit, and a plurality of gate terminals that are selectively enabled to adjust or control a capacitance. In some examples, adoption of fast, parametric coupling elements may improve the performance of superconducting qubits. A low loss, high contrast coupler may be useful in scaling up quantum computing systems. In some examples, the gate-tunable coupler may be formed using a two-dimensional electron gas in an InAs/InGaAs heterostructure. Such an implementation may yield an on/off ratio of over two orders of magnitude.
The gate voltage-controlled capacitive coupling element between neighboring superconducting qubits described herein may include a pair of fixed air-gap capacitors with a single, effective capacitance that is tuned by a collection of gates (e.g., metal oxide) that deplete a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) in a semiconductor heterostructure (e.g., InAs/InGaAs heterostructure). The described coupling element relying on tuning of electric fields to control qubit interactions may be a replacement for a flux-biased superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID)-based inductive couplers (which rely on tuning of electromagnetic fields to control qubit interactions).
Air-gap capacitors isolate the tuning elements, namely the gates, from the qubits, which may reduce stray electric fields on the neighboring qubits as compared with flux-biased SQUID devices, where stray magnetic fields lead to cross-talk between qubits. In some examples, implementations other than the air-gap capacitors may be realized to achieve a tunable capacitor without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
The capacitive coupling element 130 may include source/drain terminals 131(1)-(2) at each end that are coupled to the nodes providing the V1 and V2 voltages, respectively. The capacitive coupling element 130 may further include multiple gate terminals 132(1)-(N), where N is a positive integer. In some examples, N may be equal to 3, 4, 5, etc. In some examples, N may be less than 10. In some examples, the capacitive coupling element 130 may include only two gate terminals. The gate terminals 132(1)-(N) may be configured to control the conductive properties within the dielectric material 134 to control the effective capacitance of the capacitive coupling element 130. Each of the gate terminals 132(1)-(N) may be configured to receive a respective gate voltage VG1-VGN. Collectively, the respective VG1-VGN gate voltages may be selected to tune a particular effective capacitance of the capacitive coupling element 130 between the source/drain terminals 131(1)-(2).
In operation, the VG1-VGN gate voltages may be selected to control coupling between the first qubit 110 and the second qubit 120 by adjusting the capacitance of the capacitive coupling element 130. That is, as the VG1-VGN gate voltages increase, the coupling between the first qubit 110 and the second qubit 120 become tighter, because the capacitance increases within the capacitive coupling element. Implementation of the capacitive coupling element 130 may be a replacement for a flux-biased SQUID-based inductive couplers, and may reduce crosstalk between the field controlling the coupler and the qubits, particularly if the qubits are tunable with magnetic flux.
In some examples, alternatively or additionally, the capacitive coupling element may be configured to adjust the capacitance in response to the alternating-current (AC) fields to perform parametric operations. In some examples, first and second qubits 110 and 120 and the capacitive coupling element 130 may be included in a small logical qubit device. In some examples, one of the pair of qubits may be a solid-state qubit and the other may be a three-dimensional cavity. In some examples, the capacitive coupling element may be configured to adjust the capacitance of the capacitive coupling element to route a signal between the first and qubits 110 and 120. In a multi-qubit architecture on a chip with multiple ones of the tunable elments, the tunable elements may be configured to route singals around the chip for any purpose.
The gate terminals 232(1)-(N) may be configured to control the conductive properties within the dielectric material 234 (e.g., InAs) and 235 (e.g., InGaAs) formed on the substrate 238 (e.g., InAIAs) to control the effective capacitance of the capacitive coupling element 230. The substrate 238 may have a height of W nm. Each of the gate terminals 232(1)-(N) may be configured to receive a respective gate voltage VG1-VGN. Collectively, the respective VG1-VGN gate voltages may be selected to tune a particular effective capacitance of the capacitive coupling element 230 between the source/drain terminals 231(1)-(2).
The dielectric material 234 and 235 may be buffered on each side by respective n+ regions 233 and air-gap regions 236. The air gap regions 236 may be in contact with the source/drain terminals 231(1)-(2). The n+ region 233 may include highly doped n-type InAs. The n+ regions 233 may also be formed on the substrate 238, and may have a width of Z nm. The air-gap regions 236 may have a width of V nm. In some examples, V is less than Z. In some examples, Z is 3, 4, or 5 times greater than V. In some examples, X is four times greater than Z.
Appendix A includes specific, non-limiting examples of the capacitive coupling element described herein. The contents of Appendix A are incorporated herein in their entirety for all purposes.
From the foregoing it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the disclosure have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, the disclosure is not limited except as by the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/132,831, filed Dec. 31, 2020, entitled “Tunable Capacitor for Superconducting Qubits Using an InAs/InGaas Heterostructure,” the contents of which are incorporated herein in their entirety for all purposes.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63132831 | Dec 2020 | US |
