1. Field of the Invention
The invention pertains to dielectric resonator circuits. More particularly, the invention pertains to dielectric resonator filters that are tunable over a broad bandwidth range and a broad frequency range.
2. Background of the Invention
WiMAX (Worldwide Inter-Operability For Microwave Access) is a wireless industry coalition organized to advance IEEE 802.16 standards for broadband wireless access networks. WiMAX 802.16 technology is adapted to enable multimedia applications with a wireless connection. WiMAX 802.16 has a range of up to 30 miles, presenting network providers with a wireless, last-mile solution for wideband data transmission.
According to the WiMAX IEEE 802.16 specification, WiMAX transmitters transmit data at frequencies between 2500 MHz and 2700 MHz or between 3500 MHz and 3700 MHz and may have channel bandwidths between 5 MHz and 30 MHz.
Accordingly, there is a need to supply the WiMAX 802.16 industry with microwave filters that can provide band pass filters capable of offering these parameters.
To minimize manufacturing and design costs, it would be beneficial for the manufacturers of filters for the WiMAX industry to be able to manufacture a filter of a single basic design that can be easily and inexpensively tuned to provide a passband over these broad frequency and bandwidth ranges.
Dielectric resonator circuits and filters are commonly used in the wireless microwave transmission field because of their very high quality factor, Q, and thus low losses.
Dielectric resonators have multiple modes of electrical fields and magnetic fields concentrated at different center frequencies. A mode is a field configuration corresponding to a resonant frequency of the system as determined by Maxwell's equations. In a dielectric resonator, the fundamental resonant mode frequency, i.e., the lowest frequency, is normally the transverse electric field mode, TE01 (or TE hereinafter). Typically, the fundamental TE mode is the desired mode of the circuit or system in which the resonator is incorporated.
Microwave energy is introduced into the cavity by an input coupler 28. That energy electromagnetically couples from the input coupler to the first dielectric resonator. Conductive separating walls 32a-32d separate the resonators from each other and block (partially or wholly) coupling between physically adjacent resonators 10. Particularly, irises 30a, 30b, 30c in walls 32b, 32c, 32d control the coupling between adjacent resonators 10a-10b, 10b-10c, and 10c-10d. Walls without irises generally prevent any coupling between adjacent resonators separated by those walls. Walls with irises allow some coupling between adjacent resonators separated by those walls. By way of example, the dielectric resonators 10a, 10b, 10c, 10d in
Generally, both the bandwidth and the center frequency of the filter must be set very precisely. Bandwidth is essentially dictated by the coupling between the dielectric resonators and, therefore, is affected by (a) the spacing between the individual dielectric resonators 10 of the circuit and (b) the metal between the dielectric resonators (i.e., the size and shape of the housing 24, the walls 32 and the irises 30 in those walls, as well as any tuning screws placed between the dielectric resonators as discussed below). Frequency, on the other hand, is primarily a function the size of the individual dielectric resonators and the metal adjacent the individual resonators.
Initial frequency and bandwidth tuning of these circuits is done by selecting a particular size and shape for the housing and the spacing between the individual resonators. Generally, a different housing design is developed and manufactured for every circuit having a different frequency and/or bandwidth. Once the housing and initial design of the circuit is established, it is sometimes desirable to provide the capability to perform fine tuning of the frequency and/or bandwidth.
In order to permit such fine tuning of the frequency of such circuits after the basic design is developed, one or more metal tuning plates 42 may be attached to a top cover plate coaxially with a corresponding resonator 10 to affect the field of the resonator (and particularly the parasitic capacitance experienced by the resonator) in order to help set the center frequency of the filter. Particularly, plate 42 may be mounted on screws 43 passing through a threaded hole in the top cover plate (not shown) of enclosure 24. The screw may be rotated to vary the distance between the plate 42 and the resonator 10 to adjust the center frequency of the resonator.
Mechanisms also often are provided to fine tune the bandwidth of a dielectric resonator circuit after the basic design has been selected. For instance, conductive tuning screws 33 may be positioned in the irises 30 between the adjacent resonators to affect the coupling between the resonators. The tuning screws 33 can be rotated within threaded holes in the housing to increase or decrease the amount of conductor (e.g., metal) in the space between adjacent resonators in order to affect the capacitance between the two adjacent resonators and, therefore, the coupling therebetween. However, such tuning screws do not permit significant changes in coupling strength between the dielectric resonators. Tuning screws typically provide tunability of not much more than 15 percent.
Thus, for a standard dielectric resonator filter, tunability over a 200 MHz frequency range and over a bandwidth range from 5 MHz to 30 MHz for a single basic circuit design is not reasonably possible.
Furthermore, the Q of dielectric resonator circuits is highly sensitive to tuning, particularly at very high frequencies such as that required for WiMAX. The Q of a circuit is a measure of the ability of the circuit to concentrate the electromagnetic (EM) field energy without loss. More specifically the quality factor, Q, is proportional to the amount of stored EM energy divided by the amount of lost energy. Q is defined at resonance.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a dielectric resonator circuit that is tunable over a broad range of frequency and/or bandwidth, preferably, without substantially diminishing the Q of the circuit.
In accordance with a first aspect of the invention, a dielectric resonator is provided comprising a first body component comprising a substantial portion of a generally annular shape and having an open space substantially interrupting the annular shape and a second body portion shaped to substantially fill the open space without contacting the first body portion.
In accordance with a second aspect of the invention, a dielectric resonator circuit is provided comprising an enclosure, an input coupler, an output coupler and at least one dielectric resonator disposed in the enclosure, each resonator comprising a first body component comprising first and second substantially parallel faces, the first and second faces joined by at least one third face running between the first and second faces defining a periphery of the body, a first through opening in the body extending in a first direction perpendicular to the first and second faces, the first opening defining a fourth, inner face of the body, and a second opening in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction extending from the at least one third face to the fourth face, and a second body component comprising a plug shaped and positioned to fit at least partially within the second opening, the second body component adjustably mounted to the enclosure so as to be movable relative to the first body component in the second direction to permit tuning of the circuit.
In accordance with a third aspect of the invention, a method is provided for tuning a dielectric resonator circuit comprising a plurality of dielectric resonators disposed in a housing, each resonator comprising a first body component comprising first and second substantially parallel faces, the first and second faces joined by at least one third face running between the first and second faces defining a periphery of the body, a first through opening in the body extending in a first direction perpendicular to the first and second faces, the first opening defining a fourth, inner face of the body, and a second opening in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction extending from the at least one third face to the fourth face and a second body component comprising a plug matingly shaped to and collinear with the second opening, the second body component adjustably mounted to the enclosure so as to be movable relative to the first body component in the second direction to permit tuning of the circuit, the method comprising adjustably mounting the second body components to the housing so that the second body components are movable in the second hole in the second direction relative to the first body component of the resonator and moving the second body components in the second direction to alter the center frequencies of the resonators.
In a preferred embodiment, the second hole 117 is cylindrical.
The second body component 103 (herein termed the tuning plug body component) comprises a first portion 103a that is matingly sized and shaped to fit within the second through hole 117 so that it may pass through the second through hole and substantially fill the cross-section of the through hole, but is slightly smaller than the through hole 117 so that there will be no physical contact between the two body components 101, 103. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the tuning plug 103 may further include a second portion 103b comprising a head that is larger in cross-section (in the x, z plane) than the first segment 103a. A through hole 103c is provided to accept a mounting post (not shown).
The tuning plug 103 and the main body portion 101 need not necessarily be made of the same dielectric material.
Moving the tuning plug 103 in the direction of the y axis changes the amount of dielectric material in the second through hole 117 of the main body component 101 and, therefore, alters the resonance frequency of the resonator 100. Accordingly, moving the tuning plug 103 along the y-axis tunes the resonance (or center) frequency of the resonator. Also, moving the tuning plug changes the gap between the head portion 103b of the tuning plug 103 and the adjacent surface 119 of the resonator, thereby modifying the tangential fields at the dielectric/air interfaces and decreasing the sensitivity of tuning.
In a dielectric resonator, electric fields are concentrated in the dielectric material due to the high dielectric constant of the dielectric resonator material. The magnetic field, however, is not concentrated because dielectric materials generally have a magnetic constant (or μ) of 1.
As previously noted, the resonance frequency of a resonator is primarily a function of the size and shape of the resonator, i.e., the amount of dielectric material within which the TE field mode is concentrated. Accordingly, moving the tuning plug changes the effective shape of the dielectric resonator as well as the amount of the dielectric material in the path of the TE mode field lines.
Particularly, the tuning plugs may be mounted on threaded screws passing through matingly threaded holes in the walls of the enclosure so that rotation of the screws causes the tuning plug to move linearly in the y direction. If the tuning plug is cylindrical or otherwise symmetric about its central axis in the y direction, the tuning plug can be rigidly mounted to the end of the screw (so that it rotates with the screw). If, however, the tuning plug is not symmetric about a central axis in the y direction, it may need to be mounted to the housing by means of a mounting mechanism in which the tuning plug does not rotate during linear movement in the y direction so that it does not hit the main body component 101. This could be accomplished by mounting the tuning plug on an unthreaded post frictionally engaged in a hole in the housing, for instance.
The portion 119 of the outer annular surface 109 of the main body portion 101 around the second through hole 117 may be made flat (as best seen in
This flat portion 119 on the main body component 101 and/or the head portion 103b on the tuning plug body component 103 may be incorporated into the resonator, if desired, for the purpose of decreasing tuning sensitivity. These features may be omitted if it is desired to maximize tuning sensitivity. Particularly,
Simulations show that, with the tuning plug 103 in this position, the center frequency of the fundamental TE mode is 2.4892 GHz and the circuit has a Q of 28,908. It has a spurious response of 800 MHz (i.e., the frequency of the next closest field mode is 800 MHz higher than the center frequency of the fundamental TE mode.
Thus, it can be seen that a 9 mm movement of the tuning plug results in an approximately 200 MHz shift in center frequency (the full range required to cover the entire WiMAX range of either 2500 MHz-2700 MHz band or 3500-3700 MHz. Further, spurious response and Q are excellent and Q is almost unaffected over this tuning range.
The movement of the tuning plug 103 has little or no effect on the bandwidth of a dielectric resonator filter. Particularly, as previously noted, the dielectric materials generally have a magnetic constant of 1. Therefore, the magnetic field is not more concentrated in the resonator bodies than in the surrounding air. Hence, movement of the tuning plug will not substantially affect the magnetic field and therefore will not substantially affect the bandwidth of the filter.
Even further minimizing the affect of movement of the tuning plug on the magnetic field (and thus on coupling), is the fact that the electric field and the magnetic field are more physically separated in the resonators of the present invention as compared to conventional resonators. Specifically,
As previously noted, the bandwidth of a dielectric resonator filter, is dictated primarily by coupling of the magnetic fields (not the electrical fields) of the resonators in the circuit. The more the magnetic coupling, the wider the bandwidth. The amount of magnetic coupling between resonators depends primarily on three factors. First, the more magnetic field outside of the resonator, the more coupling between adjacent resonators. Further, the closer the resonators are to each other, the more coupling. Finally, the cavity affects coupling strength. The same resonators placed in the same positions relative to each other will coupled with the different strengths in different sized cavities. Specifically, the presence of the resonators excites the cavity modes of the field configurations that coincide with those of the resonators and which respect the symmetry of the cavity. However, these are evanescent and not propagating modes supported by charges and currents on the inside surface of the cavity. There are many such modes, but generally only the fundamental mode contributes to and modifies the coupling between the resonators. The other modes have larger evanescent constants and, therefore, die out very fast. The interaction between the magnetic field of the resonators and the currents of the cavity affects the coupling and is responsible for most of the conductive losses.
The resonators may be rotatably mounted to the housing by threaded screws extending in the y direction of the resonators that pass through matingly threaded holes in the housing.
As previously noted, the most concentrated portion of the magnetic field is displaced slightly downwardly from the central longitudinal axis (z) of the resonator (into the page in
For a given resonator spacing, the coupling of the resonators depends substantially on the orientation of the resonators relative to the side walls, and particularly the long side walls 501b, 501d. Specifically, the losses depend mostly on the distance to the nearest wall to the resonator in the z-direction of the resonator because the greatest concentration of the magnetic field is in this direction towards that wall. By tilting the resonators, this distance is generally increased and, therefore, the Q of the resonator-cavity system is generally enhanced.
In the simple case of a rectangular enclosure such as illustrated in
For other shapes of enclosures (e.g., folded, radial, etc.), the most significant walls with respect to the orientation of the resonators may be different than for the simple case of a rectangular enclosure.
Another significant feature is that the adjacent resonators that are to couple to each other are positioned so that they overlap each other in the z dimension of the resonators. That is, there is a portion of the main resonator body 101 of each resonator for which a line drawn parallel to the z axis of that resonator intersects the next, adjacent resonator with which it is to couple. For instance, see line 541 in
Specifically, the magnetic field lines can be separated into two categories, namely direct coupling field lines and indirect coupling field lines. The direct coupling field lines are the field lines emanating from a first resonator that couple to the next (second) resonator in a “direct” path such as illustrated by field line 543 in
The indirect coupling field lines are the field lines that couple to the next resonator in an “indirect” path which have substantially turned in the opposite direction from which they originally emanated from the first resonator before entering the second resonator at a point 512 on the other side of the second resonator from the direct coupling field lines, such as illustrated by path 544 in
The magnetic fluxes that indirectly couple to the second resonator are in anti-phase with the field lines that directly couple to the second resonator. The direct and indirect coupling field lines cancel each other partially.
As previously mentioned, the magnetic field flux from one resonator to the next defines the coupling strength. Two resonators are maximally coupled when the overlapping is maximum, i.e., when the z axes of the resonators are collinear and all coupling is direct coupling. Hence, there is only one corresponding flux.
On the other hand, when two resonators are completely non-overlapping (e.g., their z axes are normal to long side walls 501b, 501d), there is only indirect coupling. In this orientation, the coupling is still strong, but not as strong as in the case of complete overlap.
Orientations between these two extremes, such as oblique angle actually illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a tuning screw 531 can be provided between the two resonators to fine tune the coupling strength (i.e., bandwidth).
A rectangular housing as illustrated by the embodiment of
The principles of this embodiment are essentially similar to those of the first embodiment illustrated in
The TE field is in the x-y plane and is concentrated in the resonator material. The field lines are closed (and therefore generally circular) and are concentrated in the loosely circular path defined by tuning plug 703, leg 701a, adjoining portion 701c, and leg 701b. Hence, moving the tuning plug up and down along the y axis changes the size of the path of the TE field lines through the dielectric resonator material defined by the two legs 701a, 701b, adjoining portion 701c, and the tuning plug 703. Obviously, as the block is moved downwardly, the size of that space is decreased, thereby decreasing the space in which the TE field is concentrated. This increases the center frequency of the resonator. For instance, compare the field path 801 shown in
In one sense, the shape of the main body portion 701 in the embodiment of
Having thus described a few particular embodiments of the invention, various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements as are made obvious by this disclosure are intended to be part of this description though not expressly stated herein, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only, and not limiting. The invention is limited only as defined in the following claims and equivalents thereto.