This disclosure relates to wireless communication and, in particular, to resonators.
In recent years, much interest has been shown to generate high-performance devices for wireless communications. Simultaneously, 3D printing technologies continue to generate better results as the industry delivers machines that can match higher standards in geometrical tolerances and expand into new materials with a broad portfolio of properties.
Injection molding of thermoplastics is used widely on everyday-use products. In recent years, micro-IM technology has advanced to deliver parts with tight tolerances on the order of microns. These can be successfully metalized with finely finished surfaces while producing parts with complex 3D geometries, providing a significantly lower cost per part and lower weight per volume, with the same or better characteristics of a machined part. Moreover, micro-IMs have the potential to generate components for higher frequency bands as well, as they can maintain the required micrometer-scale tolerances.
The embodiments may be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale. Moreover, in the figures, like-referenced numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
The roll-out of 5th generation (5G) wireless communication technology is constantly demanding the increase of available communication bands. The next generation of factory equipment, vehicles, and personal devices will generate and transmit massive amounts of data in real-time. These 5G communication networks require a significant increase in the available channels. The challenge lies in the coexistence of all these channels without interference between them. Currently, more than 50 frequency bands are used in 4G networks, and it is expected that they will increase to 75 or 100 as more advanced 5G networks are rolled out globally, thereby expanding the complexity of the RF front-end. Moreover, 100× increase in the network at the edge through the introduction of small cell towers exponentially increases hardware costs and requires a higher degree of self-configuration. A recent report estimates that 45 million 5G small cell towers would be installed by the end of 2031. Reconfigurable filters offer an alternative solution to lower costs and increase the performance of small cell station.
Evanescent-mode (EVA) resonators are capable of delivering high-performance devices. Most recently, efforts have been focused on minimizing manufacturing costs while preserving performance. Hickle has shown promising results with printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing, demonstrating wide tunability of 91% tuning range, from 3.2-6.1 GHz. Simultaneously, this manufacturing method is in line with the current manufacturing method of millimeter-wave components for cost reduction. Research has also been advancing for EVA-mode devices to match the demand of 5G for higher frequencies by pushing the PCB manufacturing boundaries. In a high frequency band-stop filter is shown tuning from 22-42 GHz with performance with less than 1 dB out-of-band insertion loss. Advancements in well-established technologies, such as injection molding (IM), are candidates for lower cost, high performance, scalable manufacturing, and great potential to deliver on these research efforts.
The disclosure herein demonstrates low-cost and high-performance through manufacturing with IM technology of an air-filled EVA-mode resonator and a bandpass filter (BPF). In various embodiments, an unloaded quality factor (Qu) ranging from 1548-2573 was measured, representing state-of-the-art performance and a record power-handling of more than 100 W.
The RF cavity core 102 may further include a post 108 centrally positioned within the RF cavity 104. The post 108 may include a protrusion within the RF cavity 104 that extends from a base end of the RF cavity core 102 toward the flexible membrane 106. A gap may be defined between the flexible membrane 106 and an end of the post 108. The RF cavity core 102 may further include an input port to the cavity an output port from the cavity.
The RF Cavity core 102 may further include a flange 114 around an outer perimeter of the resonator. The flange 114 may be an annular disk and define a recess 116 in which the flexible membrane is received. The flange 114 may include a plurality of holes to receive fasteners for assembly. The RF cavity core may be an injection molded plastic with a metalized plating.
One example of a technical advancement is that post 108 may be tapered such that a first width of the post proximate to the membrane is smaller than a second width of the post proximate to a base end of the RF cavity core. Likewise, the RF cavity 104 may be tapered such that a first width of the RF cavity proximate to the membrane is wider than a second width of the cavity proximate to a base end of the RF cavity core.
In some examples and in another manner of description, the RF cavity core 102 may include a first recess and a second recess within the first recess. The second recess may define the RF cavity 104. The flexible membrane 106 may be positioned within the first recess and the post 108 may be positioned within the second recess.
The tunable RF resonator assembly 200 may include a base fixture 206 having an input port 208 and an output port 210 may receive the RF cavity core 102 such that the input port 208 and output port 210 of the base fixture are respectively aligned with the input port and the output port of the RF cavity core 102.
The tunable RF resonator may include an actuator fixture 212. The actuator fixture may be coupled to the linear actuator 202 and the RF cavity core 102. The RF cavity core 102 may be coupled to the base fixture 206. The RF cavity core 102 may include a flange 114 comprising a plurality of mounting holes which receive mechanical fixtures for affixing the RF cavity core 102 to the base fixture 108, actuator fixture 212, or any other component.
A tunable membrane 106 may be positioned on top of the RF cavity core 104. The tunable membrane may have cover each of the cambers. For example, the tunable membrane may have multiple tuning sections positioned above the chambers 302, 304, respectively. The area of the tuning sections may vary based on the volume of the chambers 302, 304. For example a first tuning section for the first chamber 302 have a larger area than a second tuning section for the second chamber 304.
The tunable RF filter may further include a base fixture 404 having an input port and an output port. The base fixture 404 may receive the RF cavity core 102 such that the input port and output port of the base fixture are respectively aligned with the input port and the output port of the RF cavity core 102.
The tunable RF filter assembly 400 may further include an actuator fixture 202. The actuator fixture 406 may be coupled to the multiple linear actuators 202 and to the RF cavity core 102. The RF cavity core 102 may be coupled to the base fixture 404. The RF cavity core 102 may include a flange comprising a plurality of mounting holes which receive mechanical fixtures for affixing the RF cavity core 102 to the base fixture 404, actuator fixture 212, or any other component.
In the examples shown in
where cavity inductance (Lcav) is given belowV
Cseqv is the total approximate capacitance between the post and membrane Cpm and the post and the cavity Cpc, and can be calculated using the following equations:
Other important parameters of the RF cavity resonator are described as follows. The frequency tuning of the resonator depends primarily on Cpm. A change in the gap height hg between the post and the membrane changes Cpm, thus changing the resonant frequency and tuning the resonator. In this particular resonator design, the lowest gap considered is 45.7 μm, which corresponds to the lowest resonance frequency of 2.0 GHz, and the highest gap is 540 μm, which corresponds to the highest resonance frequency of 5.0 GHZ.
Qu is an important parameter of a resonator circuit and indicates the loss associated with the resonator (a lower loss implies a higher Qu). In general, resonators suffer losses due to conductor loss, dielectric loss, and radiation loss. With an air-filled cavity, the IM resonator had the lowest possible dielectric loss. Radiation loss is also low because of the close contact between the flexible ceiling and cavity. To minimize conductor loss, the IM technology implementation aimed at a high surface finish for the part, which was maintained during metalization by utilizing a reverse power plating (RPP) method (Ra=0.31 μm)
The filter response type and fractional bandwidth (FBW) depend on the cavities' external input/output and inter-resonator couplings. The external couplings are evaluated by the external quality factor Qe, and the inter-resonator coupling k12 is evaluated by the even-mode (fm) and odd-mode (fe) resonance frequencies of a coupled-resonator system. In one embodiment, a Chebyshev BPF response at 2.8 GHz (hg=101 μm) with 7.6% FBW and 30 dB minimum return loss is initially designed, with calculated coupling values Qe=4.76, and k12=0.22. A highly coupled response is chosen to achieve low insertion loss in the passband.
The required external coupling was realized by an RF connector inserted through the sidewall of the cavity and short circuited on the metalized sidewall of the capacitive post. The coupling strength is controlled by the distance of the pin from the top of the post, as shown by dimension hi in
The iris located between the two resonators implements the necessary inter-resonator coupling, where the dimensions Wi and dp shown in
The iris dimensions providing the k12 were determined to be Wi=13 mm and dp=16 mm.
Finally, a flexible membrane is used to enclose the cavity top to provide vertical movement and control the air gap (hg) to tune the filter. An LCP layer was mechanically pressed against the sidewalls to achieve good contact, thus maintaining a high Qu. Two external microactuators individually control the two separate tuners, changing hg from 101 μm to 588 μm, thus tuning the filter from 2.8 to 5.2 GHz.
Technological limitations and capabilities were considered to define a desirable design for part manufacturing, part assembly, and device performance. Design constraints may change certain aspects of a commercially manufactured resonator or filter using the advancements described herein. One parameter carefully considered herein is the flexible upper wall of the air-filled cavity, which serves as a tuning element. An external actuator facilitates its accurate movement to control the resonant frequency of the device. As such, the large diameter of the tuning membrane allows for more deflection, which dictates the resonator tuning range. The geometrical characteristics, such as the diameter of the post, the diameter of the cavity, depth of the cavity, and actuation length of the membrane, will be modified in the RF design and will be analytically explained herein.
Finally, it should be appreciated that while injection molding technology has provided an avenue by which the embodiments disclosed herein were explored, injection molding technology itself is not necessarily a limitation of manufacturing the embodiments described herein.
To clarify the use of and to hereby provide notice to the public, the phrases “at least one of <A>, <B>, . . . and <N>” or “at least one of <A>, <B>, . . . <N>, or combinations thereof” or “<A>, <B>, . . . and/or <N>” are defined by the Applicant in the broadest sense, superseding any other implied definitions hereinbefore or hereinafter unless expressly asserted by the Applicant to the contrary, to mean one or more elements selected from the group comprising A, B, . . . and N. In other words, the phrases mean any combination of one or more of the elements A, B, . . . or N including any one element alone or the one element in combination with one or more of the other elements which may also include, in combination, additional elements not listed.
A second action may be said to be “in response to” a first action independent of whether the second action results directly or indirectly from the first action. The second action may occur at a substantially later time than the first action and still be in response to the first action. Similarly, the second action may be said to be in response to the first action even if intervening actions take place between the first action and the second action, and even if one or more of the intervening actions directly cause the second action to be performed. For example, a second action may be in response to a first action if the first action sets a flag and a third action later initiates the second action whenever the flag is set.
While various embodiments have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible. Accordingly, the embodiments described herein are examples, not the only possible embodiments and implementations.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/442,989 filed Feb. 2, 2023, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63442989 | Feb 2023 | US |