1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to tunable interference filters, and more specifically, it relates to tunable filters that have a transmittance that is independent of the polarization state of the incident beam.
2. Description of Related Art
The transmission profile of an interference bandpass filter comprises the transmission peak wavelength, the transmittance and the pass bandwidth. The transmission peak wavelength is a function of the angle of incidence of incoming light. Increasing the incident angle will shift the transmission peak wavelength to a shorter wavelength. Typically, the amount of shift depends on the polarization state of the incident light. Any polarization state can be expressed in terms of two orthogonal linearly polarized states. conventionally, the designations of S-polarization and P-polarization are used to represent the two orthogonal polarizations with P-polarization being parallel to the plane of incidence. In this disclosure, the plane of incidence is referred to as the XZ plane.
When the interference filter is tilted at a large angle with respect to an incident beam, the components of the P-polarization and the S-polarization can each have a relatively different transmission profile, an example of which is shown in
The input and output beams, I(in) and I(out), of any polarization state can be expressed as follows.
I(in)=Ip(in)+Is(in), and
I(out)=Ip(out)+Is(out),
Therefore, when transmittance is characterized as a percentage and the system includes a mirror so that the beam makes two passes through the filter,
Tnet=I(out)/I(in)=(Ip(in)×Tp×Tp+Is(in)×Ts×Ts)/(Ip(in)+Is(in)).
3
In the prior art, polarization splitting elements have been used to split the incident beam into two beams according to their polarizations, P or S. An appropriate wave plate inserted into the path of one of the two beams can convert its polarization to the same as the polarization of the other beam, for instance, from S-polarization to P-polarization. As a result, both beams can have the same polarization. In this manner, the influence of different polarizations can be eliminated. Unfortunately, prior art configurations for these systems are complicated. It is desirable to provide embodiments of tunable filters that have a transmittance that is independent of the polarization state of the incident beam. It is also desirable to provide embodiments that are simplified compared to the prior art, have low polarization dependent losses, eliminate polarization splitting/recombining elements, are compact due to the elimination of the polarization splitting/recombining elements and allow the use of a dual-fiber collimator as input/output ports.
It is an object of the present invention to provide tunable filters that have transmittances that are independent of the polarization state of an incident beam.
It is another object of the present invention to provide tunable filters that have low polarization dependent losses.
Another object of the present invention is to provide tunable filters that eliminate polarization splitting and recombining elements.
An object of the present invention is to provide tunable filters that are compact.
Another object of the present invention is to provide tunable filters that allow the use of dual-fiber collimators as input/output ports.
These and other objects of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art based on the teachings of this disclosure.
A tunable filter includes an interference bandpass filter positioned to transmit an input beam of light to produce transmitted light. A wave plate is positioned to rotate the polarization of the transmitted light and a reflector is positioned to reflect the rotated light so that it propagates through the wave plate a second time and then passes through the interference filter a second time to produce second transmitted light. A mount can be provided to rotate the filter about an axis that is perpendicular to the normal of the surface of the filter. In some embodiments, one or more fiber collimators provide an input port and an output port. In an ideal case, the interference filter is selected to have about the same amount of wavelength shift for each polarization of the beam of light when the filter is tilted in various angles. Example reflectors include a mirror and a retro-reflector. Example wave plate include a ¼ waveplate and a ½ waveplate. In some cases, the input light is provided from one fiber collimator and the output light is collected by a second fiber collimator. The retro-reflector can have about the same amount of phase change on reflection for each polarization. Embodiments of the invention include methods for operating the tunable filters as well as methods for fabrication of the tunable filters. The configurations of the tunable filters provide transmittances that are independent of the polarization state of an incident beam.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and form a part of the disclosure, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
When a linearly polarized beam passes through a wave plate whose polarization axis is at an angle α with respect to the direction of polarization of the beam, the polarization direction of the beam is rotated by an angle 2α. For example, when α=45 degrees, a linearly polarized beam with its polarization direction in the vertical direction (X-axis) becomes a linearly polarized beam with its polarization direction in the horizontal direction (Y-axis). Referring specifically to
Given a uniform input beam having a bandwidth greater than the bandpass of a particular filter of interest, and referring, as an example, to the transmittance of the filter of
When the portion of the input beam that is S-polarized relative to the interference filter propagates through the filter on a first pass, it will have the transmittance according to the Ts curve. After this polarization follows the same path as the P-polarized beam, it become P-polarized and the second transmission through the interference filter will again be the product of the Ts and Tp curves. Accordingly, it will make no difference what the angle of the interference filter is relative to the input beam, both polarization components will have identical transmission curves and hence, the tunable filter has a transmittance that is independent of the polarization state of the incident beam.
Thus, for the P-polarization component of an input beam, the resulting transmission profile is determined by the product of Tp and Ts.
Tnet=Ip(out)/Ip(in)=Ip(in)×Tp×Ts/Ip(in)=Tp×Ts.
Similarly, for the S-polarization component of the input beam, the resulting transmission profile is determined by the product of Tp and Ts.
Tnet=Is(out)/Is(in)=Is(in)×Ts×Tp/Is(in)=Ts×Tp.
When the wavelength shift for each polarization is about the same, the product of Tp and Ts has a single peak with a small insertion loss, as shown in
It should be noted that if the transmitted peaks of P- and S-polarization in a single pass are far apart such as in
Thus, any polarization state can be expressed in terms of two orthogonal linearly polarized states. The input and output beams, I(in) and I(out), of any polarization state can be expressed as follows.
I(in)=Ip(in)+Is(in), and
I(out)=Ip(out)+Is(out).
Therefore,
Tnet=I(out)/I(in)=(Ip(in)×Tp ×Ts+Is(in)×Ts×Tp)/(Ip(in)+Is(in))=Ts×Tp.
The net transmittance is independent of the polarization of the input beam. In theory, the polarization dependent loss (PDL) should be zero. The residual PDL could be due to the orientation of the wave plate, and the dispersion of the wave plate. In contrast, without using the ¼ wave plate, the transmittance of a filter in an angle will have strong polarization dependence, as follows.
Tnet=(Ip(in)×Tp×Tp=Is(in)×Ts×Ts)/(Ip(in)+Is(in)).
The foregoing description of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive, or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments disclosed were meant only to explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best use the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications suited to the particular use contemplated. The scope of the invention is to be defined by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/540,867 titled “Tunable Filter Using a Wave Plate,” filed Sep. 29, 2011, incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61540867 | Sep 2011 | US |