The subject matter described herein relates to methods and electronic devices, e.g., tunable filters, cancellers, and duplexers based on passive mixers.
With increasing smartphone sales and consumption of bandwidth, wireless providers and device manufacturers are being pressured to improve spectral efficiency. Multi-band smartphones can use multiple channel filters to effectively use the wireless spectrum. The prospect of ever rising cost, complexity and space requirements in smartphones has driven the search for an ultra-wideband tunable filter. To date, research has focused on microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) or other switched filter banks and on tunable capacitors, but these solutions have not yet met all the criteria for commercial success. Without a cost-effective ultra-wideband tuning technology free of distortion, utilization of spectrum will be inadequate, adversely affecting consumers, industry and the economy.
Accordingly, there exists a need for a cost-effective ultra-wideband tuning technology with low distortion, and particularly for tunable filters, cancellers, and duplexers.
The subject matter described herein includes tunable filters, cancellers, and duplexers based on passive mixers. A tunable delay cell includes passive mixers electrically coupled together for receiving an input signal and outputting a delayed signal, each passive mixer comprising a plurality of mixer switches. The tunable delay includes a control circuit for providing, to each passive mixer, a respective plurality of local oscillator (LO) signals, one to each mixer switch of each passive mixer. The control circuit is configured to vary the LO signals to cause a target frequency band of the input signal to be delayed by a target delay time in propagating through the passive mixers.
A tunable filter includes a reflective-type filter that includes a filter input for receiving an input signal, a filter output for outputting a filtered signal, and first and second reflective loads. The reflective-type filter includes a directional coupler for coupling the input signal to the first and second reflective loads and for coupling first and second reflected signals from the first and second reflective loads to the filter output. The first and second reflective loads are configured so that the combination of the first and second reflected signals results in a filtered response of the filter input at the filter output. Example filtered responses include bandpass or bandstop. The tunable filter includes a feedforward path, between the filter input and the first and second reflective loads, configured to cancel isolation leakage within the reflective-type filter.
A tunable duplexer includes one or more antennas; an isolator electrically coupled to the one or more antennas for isolating a received signal and a transmitted signal on the one or more antennas; a combiner comprising a first input electrically coupled to the one or more antennas; and a feedforward path, between a coupler of the transmitted signal and a second input of the combiner, configured to cancel leakage across the isolator. The feedforward path comprises a tunable delay cell including a plurality of passive mixers electrically coupled together for receiving an input signal and outputting a delayed signal, each passive mixer including a plurality of mixer switches.
A tunable duplexer includes one or more antennas; an isolator electrically coupled to the one or more antennas for isolating a received signal and a transmitted signal on the one or more antennas; a combiner comprising a first input electrically coupled to the one or more antennas; a reflective-type tunable filter electrically coupled to an output of the combiner; and a feedforward path, between the output of the combiner and one or more reflective loads of the reflective-type tunable filter, configured to cancel leakage across the a directional coupler of the reflective-type tunable filter.
A tunable duplexer includes one or more antennas; an isolator electrically coupled to the one or more antennas for isolating a received signal and a transmitted signal on the one or more antennas; a combiner comprising a first input electrically coupled to the one or more antennas; a reflective-type tunable filter electrically coupled to an output of the combiner; and a feedforward path, between a coupler of the transmitted signal and one or more reflective loads of the reflective-type tunable filter, configured to cancel leakage across the isolator.
The subject matter described herein may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. As such, the terms “function” “node” or “module” as used herein refer to hardware, which may also include software and/or firmware components, for implementing the feature being described. In one exemplary implementation, the subject matter described herein may be implemented using a computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to perform steps. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include non-transitory computer-readable media, such as disk memory devices, chip memory devices, programmable logic devices, and application specific integrated circuits. In addition, a computer readable medium that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device or computing platform or may be distributed across multiple devices or computing platforms.
This specification describes technology that can be used to implement a tunable channel selection filter for smartphones and other wireless mobile devices and radios. The technology can use frequency-translating passive mixers with feedforward cancellation to realize a widely tunable filter which reduces the need for resonance-based filters in common use today. The filter can be implemented, e.g., as a complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) circuit to provide the low size, weight, power and cost required of consumer wireless electronics, while also addressing military requirements for multi-band tuning.
The mixer switches 102 can be implemented using CMOS transistors or any appropriate switching technology. The control circuit 104 can be implemented using any appropriate combination of hardware, firmware, and/or software. The control circuit 104 can include a local oscillator and any appropriate circuitry for generating and phase-shifting local oscillator signals. In some examples, the control circuit 104 is implemented using one or more processors configured to execute instructions stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium.
In operation, the control circuit 104 provides M local oscillator (LO) signals (LO-1 to LO-M) to the mixer switches 102. The LO signals can be signals at a same frequency that are phase-shifted from one another. The LO signals can also be non-overlapping, such that when used to control the mixer switches, only one mixer switch is turned on at a time. The control circuit 104 can be configured to adjust the LO signals to cause the passive mixer 100 to operate as a frequency-shifting mixer. For example, the passive mixer 100 can operate as a down-shifting mixer that inputs a radio frequency (RF) input signal and outputs a baseband signal or an up-shifting mixer that inputs a baseband signal and outputs an RF output signal.
In the illustrated example:
The tunable reflective-type filter 210 (as illustrated in
In operation, the transmitted signal on the transmit antenna 202 is received, at least in part, on the receive antenna 204, i.e., there will be some leakage from the transmit antenna 202 to the receive antenna 204. The duplexer 200 can cancel some or all of the leakage using a feedforward path 213 coupled from the transmit channel to a combiner 212. The feedforward path 213 includes an adjustable attenuator 214 and a tunable delay cell 216. The tunable delay cell 216 includes a down-shifting mixer 218, a bandpass filter 220 (e.g., a capacitor), and an up-shifting mixer 222 electrically coupled together for receiving an input signal and outputting a delayed signal.
The duplexer 300 includes a combiner 306 having an input coupled to the isolator 304 and another input coupled to a feedforward path 310 of a coupler 308 of the transmitted signal, e.g., a weak coupler. The feedforward path 310 includes circuits to alter the amplitude, delay, and phase of the transmitted signal through the coupler 308 so that the combiner 306 can removes whatever portion of the transmitted signal leaks across the isolator 304. In essence, the feedforward path 310 is configured, by virtue of appropriate selection of amplitude, delay and phase matching, to match or approximate the path of the transmitted signal across the isolator 304, so that when the feedforward signal is subtracted from the received signal, only the received signal remains. The feedforward path 310 can also be configured to cancel out-of-band noise, e.g., by coupling to a tunable filter.
The loss can be set by the adjustable attenuator 406. The passive mixers 404 realize a tunable delay cell. The coarse delay of the tunable delay cell can be set, e.g., by a control circuit, by reordering the phases of the LO signals supplied to the passive mixers 404. The fine delay of the tunable delay cell can be set, e.g., by a control circuit, by offsetting the clocks between two passive mixers within a least significant bit (LSB) of a variable representing the delay of the cell as a mixer period. In some examples, the control circuit includes the delay circuit 408 which is configured to vary LO signals by offsetting respective clock signals. In operation, the tunable delay cell 402 behaves like a delay line within the passband of the baseband filter 404.
The first feedforward path 506 starts at a weak coupler 512 to the transmitter and ends at an adder 514. The adder 514 is a circuit configured to add the signal at the output of the first feedforward path 506 with the received output signal of the isolator 504. The output of the adder 514 is coupled to a reflective-type mixer filter 516, and the output of the reflective-type mixer filter 516 is coupled to the receiver.
The second feedforward path 508 branches from the first feedforward path 506 (or from the weak coupler 512 if the first feedforward path 506 is absent) to the reflective-type mixer filter 516. The third feedforward path 510 starts at the output of the adder 514 and ends at the reflective-type mixer filter 516.
Each of the feedforward paths 506, 508, and 510 can be implemented independently of the other feedforward paths so that the duplexer 500 can be implemented having any combination of the feedforward paths 506, 508, and 510. For example,
The second feedforward path 704 is configured to cancel the leakage over the coupler by virtue of a down-converting mixer 710 configured to downconvert a feedforward signal on the second feedforward path 704 to baseband before the feedforward signal is coupled to one or more reflective loads 712 and 714 of the reflective-type tunable filter 708. The down-converting mixer 710 is configured to downconvert the feedforward signal by virtue of being supplied with an appropriate control signal, e.g., clock4.
Accordingly, while the methods, systems, and computer readable media have been described herein in reference to specific embodiments, features, and illustrative embodiments, it will be appreciated that the utility of the subject matter is not thus limited, but rather extends to and encompasses numerous other variations, modifications and alternative embodiments, as will suggest themselves to those of ordinary skill in the field of the present subject matter, based on the disclosure herein.
Various combinations and sub-combinations of the structures and features described herein are contemplated and will be apparent to a skilled person having knowledge of this disclosure. Any of the various features and elements as disclosed herein may be combined with one or more other disclosed features and elements unless indicated to the contrary herein.
Correspondingly, the subject matter as hereinafter claimed is intended to be broadly construed and interpreted, as including all such variations, modifications and alternative embodiments, within its scope and including equivalents of the claims. It is understood that various details of the presently disclosed subject matter may be changed without departing from the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/706,327, filed Sep. 15, 2017, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/257,354 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,800,278), filed on Sep. 6, 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/214,876, filed Sep. 4, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under grant number 1353180 awarded by the National Science Foundation. The government has certain rights to this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3681697 | Moroney | Aug 1972 | A |
5303418 | Staudinger et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5410743 | Seely et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5512963 | Mankovitz | Apr 1996 | A |
6020783 | Coppola | Feb 2000 | A |
6029059 | Bojer | Feb 2000 | A |
6107898 | Rauscher | Aug 2000 | A |
6343211 | Thodesen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6654595 | Dexter | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6714775 | Miller | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6745019 | Thodesen | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6792250 | Zarubin | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6845126 | Dent | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6917815 | Hajimiri et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6934341 | Sahlman | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937849 | Kluge et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7085122 | Wu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7145415 | Sengupta et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7345557 | Podell | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7545622 | Morris, III et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7561009 | Larson, III et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7584496 | Zinevitch | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7692513 | Yoshimoto | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7768364 | Hart et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8145155 | Pullela et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8314653 | Granger-Jones et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8351874 | Dent | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8351889 | Roussel et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8565681 | Kim et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8666347 | Wilkerson et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9020065 | Wyville | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9042847 | Zhou | May 2015 | B2 |
9083518 | Bauder et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9088344 | Wyville | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9654983 | Floyd et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9800278 | Floyd et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10333569 | Floyd et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20060009172 | Shamsaifar | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20090197552 | Kurahashi et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100148888 | Hara et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110065408 | Kenington et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110122932 | Lovberg et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110227665 | Wyville | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120128350 | Popovic | May 2012 | A1 |
20140204808 | Choi et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140273814 | Ralph et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140323076 | Kintis et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140376419 | Goel et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150078702 | Dorin et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150094008 | Maxim et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150099478 | Wyville | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150133068 | Aggarwal et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150155899 | Webb et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150194884 | Levesque et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150208137 | Alrutz | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150263782 | Wyville et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160134325 | Tageman et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20170070251 | Floyd et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180013459 | Floyd et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 15/706,327 (dated Feb, 8, 2019). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/706,327 (dated Sep. 11, 2018). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 15/257,354 (dated Jun. 15, 2017). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/U32016/063863 (dated May 11, 2017) |
Restriction and/or Election Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 15/257,354 (dated Apr. 21, 2017). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,938 (dated Apr. 19, 2017). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,938 (dated Jan. 10, 2017). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,938 (dated Aug. 25, 2016). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,938 (dated May 11, 2016). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,938 (dated Nov. 5, 2015). |
Mirzaei et al., “Architectural evolution of integrated M-phase high-Q bandpass filters,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems-I, vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 52-65 (Jan. 2012). |
Bolton, “Abstract: Mobile Device RF Front-End TAM analysis and forecast”. CS ManTech Conference, p. 1 (May 16, 2011). |
Mirzaei et al., “Analysis of imperfections on performance of 4-phase passive-mixer-based high-Q bandpass filters in SAW-less receivers,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems-I, vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 879-892 (May 2011). |
Ghaffari et al., “Tunable high-Q N-path band-pass filters: modeling and verification,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 998-1010 (May 2011). |
Sideco, “Smartphones to account for majority of cellphone shipments in 2015” IHS iSupply report, pp. 2-1 (2011). |
Natarajan et al., “A fully-integrated 16-element phased-array receiver in SiGe BiCMOS for 60-GHz communications,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 1059-1075 (May 2011). |
Gartner, “Smartphone shipments up 42 per cent in Q3 2011,” www.gartner.com, pp. 1-4 (Nov. 16, 2011). |
Andrews et al., “Implications of passive mixer transparency for impedance matching and noise figure in passive mixer-first receivers,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems-I, vol. 57, No. 12, pp. 3092-3103 (Dec. 2010). |
Vye, “Perspectives on Mobile Device Front-end integration,” MW Jour, pp. 1-11 (Sep. 15, 2010). |
Werth et al., “System design considerations for SAW-less front-ends at the example of GSM DCS1088” 53rd MidWest Symp Circ and Sys, pp. 648-651 (2010). |
“RF Device Module for Cellular,” Navian Inc., www.navian.co.jp, slides 1-12, (2009). |
Meeker et al., “Internet Trends” Ten Questions Intetnet Execs Should Ask & Answer, Morgan Stanley Investor Conference, NY, siles 1-49, (Apr. 2010). |
Mi et al., “MEMS tunable bandpass filter on high-k LTCC” 23rd Int. Conf MEMS, pp. 787-790 (2010). |
Hu et al., “A wide-tuning digitally controlled FBAR-based oscillator for frequency synthesis.” Int Freq Cont Symp (FCS) pp. 608-612 (2010). |
Abouzied et al., “An integrated SAW-less narrowband RF front-end,” 53rd Midwest Symp Cir and Sys, pp. 664-667 (2010). |
Tsai et al., “60GHz passive and active RF-path phase shifters in silicon,” IEEE RFIC Symp. Dig. Papers, pp. 223-226 (Jun. 2009). |
Reines et al., “Cascadable RF MEMS switched capacitors for 0.1 to 2 GHz applications” Microwave Symp Digest, pp. 1157-1160 (2009). |
Hilbert “Radio Frequency MEMS for Wireless Communications,” IEEE Magazine, pp. 68-74 (Aug. 2008). |
Floyd et al., “A 16 to 18.8-GHz sub-integer-N frequency synthesizer for 60-GHz transceivers,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 1076-1086 (May 2008). |
Darabi, “A blocker filter technique for SAW-less wireless receivers” IEEE Solid State Circuits (42), pp. 2766-2773 (2007). |
Long, “Monolithic transformers for silicon RF IC design,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 1368-1382 (Sep. 2000). |
Franks et al., “An alternative approach to the realizations of network functions: The N-path filter,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., pp. 1321-1350 (1960). |
Cross, “MEMS for secure RFID” Crebrex Technologies SBIR Phase II report. FCC11, pp. 1-2 (Retrieved from htlps:/|www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/delaiU121049 on Oct. 30, 2015) |
Angier, “Tunable RF Filters: Pursuing the ‘holy grail’ of acoustic filter R&D.” http://mwjournal/expertadvice/tunable_RF_fulters_pursuing_holy_grail_acoustic_filter_RES_125/, pp. 1-2 (Jun. 16, 2008). |
Kaskowitz, “Mobile Everywhere—how enriched mobile media is changing the IP landscape” http://www.design-reuse.com/webinar/intro/ infinitedge2, slides 1-22 (2010). |
“RF Filters, PAs, Antenna Switches & Tunability for Cellular Handsets,” Yole Développement, pp. 1-16 (2012). |
Mi et al., “MEMS Tunable Bandpass Filters on High-k LTCC,” IEEE, pp. 787-790 (Copyright 2010). |
Doherty et al., “A New High Efficiency Power Amplifier for Modulated Waves,” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 1-20 (Sep. 1936). |
Natarajan et al., “A Bidirectional RF-Combining 60GHz Phased-Array Front End,” 2007 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, pp. 202-203, 597 (2007). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190222244 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62214876 | Sep 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15706327 | Sep 2017 | US |
Child | 16367217 | US | |
Parent | 15257354 | Sep 2016 | US |
Child | 15706327 | US |