Wireless communications is a rapidly growing segment of the communications industry, with the potential to provide high-speed high-quality information exchange between portable devices located anywhere in the world. Potential applications enabled by this technology include, but are not limited to, multimedia Internet-enabled cell phones, smart homes and appliances, automated highway systems, video teleconferencing and distance learning, and autonomous sensor networks, to name just a few. However, supporting these applications using wireless techniques poses a significant technical challenge.
Presently, mobile phones employing the Global System for Mobile Communication (“IGSM”) standard operate in multiple frequency bands. Mobile phones may be capable of three or four frequency bands, thereby allowing the mobile phone to be used with a variety of service providers. However, the speed and quality of GSM will not meet the requirements of the large data transmission of the future.
GPRS (General Packet Radio Services) is a packet-based wireless that promises data rates from 56 up to 114 Kbps and continuous connection to the Internet for mobile phone and computer users. GPRS is based on “regular” GSM (with the same modulation) and will complement existing services such circuit-switched cellular phone connections such as SMS or cell broadcast. Voice over IP over GPRS has also been explored.
Similarly, Enhanced Data rate for Global Evolution (EDGE) is a radio based high-speed mobile data standard. It allows data transmission speeds of 384 kbps to be achieved when all eight timeslots are used. This means a maximum bit rate of 48 kbps per timeslot. Even higher speeds and bandwidths are now available as WCDMA (Wideband Code Division Multiple Access) is implemented.
As handsets move to meet increased bandwidth needs, the requirements of components are more astringent. Battery life has to be maximized, reception clarity in a multitude of environments has to be improved and at the same time the customers require a significant reduction in size. These requirements burden the Radio Frequency (RF) front end modules (FEM) to be capable of modulating efficiently and dynamically between the leading global wireless broadband standards in a single platform solution.
In order to maximize battery life, energy transfer received by RF (inputs and outputs) must be perfectly matched to the impedance of the antennas. This impedance is typically assumed to be 50 ohms. For no mismatch losses to occur, the impedance of the radio must be the “conjugate match” of the impedance of the antenna. That is, the impedances must have the exact same value of real impedance (resistive part) and opposite but equal value of imaginary impedances (reactive part). For example, if the radio impedance is 40+j6, the antenna impedance must be 40−j6 in order to have no power lost due to impedance mismatch.
However, this 50 ohm design target is never perfectly met and also an antenna's impedance is never consistently 50 ohms over all conditions and frequencies of operation. The greater the difference in impedance, the less power reaches the antenna and radiates. Instead, a portion of this power (proportional to the impedance mismatch) is reflected back towards the radio during transmission and never gets radiated out of the antenna as intended. Given the reciprocal nature of most radios with antennas, this mismatch reduces the amount of power received by the radio from the antenna during reception. Because the mobile phone is operated in various environments, the antenna is “detuned”, resulting in impedance at its I/O port which can vary wildly. Similarly, unit-to-unit variations in performance can be seen in power amplifiers, filters, switches and antennas when produced in high volume. Regardless of why the two impedances may not be matched, the greater the difference, the greater the power level reflected and the lower the power transferred (transmitted or received), thus lowering the overall efficiency of the RF system (antenna+radio). Also, antennas often compromise bandwidth in exchange for greater gain (efficiency) or reduced size. This results in greater variation of its impedance over the frequency of operation.
The voltage standing wave ratio is a measure of how well a load is impedance-matched to a source. The value of VSWR is always expressed as a ratio with 1 in the denominator (2:1, 3:1, 10:1, etc.). It is a scalar measurement, so although they reflect waves 15 oppositely, a short circuit and an open circuit have the same VSWR value (infinity: 1). A perfect impedance match corresponds to a VSWR 1:1, but in practice it will never be achieved. The reflection coefficient can be read from a Smith chart. A reflection coefficient magnitude of zero is a perfect match; a value of one is perfect reflection. The return loss of a load is merely the magnitude of the reflection coefficient expressed in decibels.
A. Fixed Impedance Networks.
With a fixed matching network, an amplifier which had been tuned for peak efficiency at the maximum output power level will show severely degraded efficiency as the gain is lowered and the output power drops. Standard matching networks present fixed impedance transformations at a given frequency. This limits the efficient operating range of an amplifier to 5 a narrow range of frequencies and a small range of power and bias settings.
B. Digital Matching Networks
Digital impedance matching using hybrid transformers, discrete OpAmp circuits, integrated analog/digital implementations are used to synthesize the matching impedance. Digital implementations of impedance matching networks are problematic due to the delays through the digital processors. These delays cause a phase difference between the incident and synthesized signals which results in an amplitude difference that worsens the return loss. This problem is generally alleviated by using a faster, but more costly and higher power consuming digital converter and processor.
C. Adaptive or Variable Matching Networks
It is possible to provide an adaptive antenna matching network which compensates for these variations. Several advantages offered by tunable matching networks, including optimization of amplifier match at varying frequency and against variable load VSWR. As the output power is reduced in a variable gain amplifier, the load impedance which allows the amplifier to operate with optimum efficiency changes. A system monitors the signal strength of an incoming signal, to provide indication of signal strength. This signal strength level is also used to adapt an adaptive network arranged to compensate for variations in antenna impedance. A problem with the above method is that adaptations of the antenna matching network may be effected in response to reductions in signal strength, when said reductions occur due to reasons other than antenna mismatch; for example, when the variations are due to mismatch in several mobile standards such as switching from GSM mode to EDGE mode. Therefore, adaptations do not improve transmission characteristics and at worst may make the transmission characteristics worse.
In variable impedance matching networks, the impedance can be adjusted to allow optimum efficiency at both low and high power settings. Output matching networks consisting of lumped capacitors (standard ceramic or tantalum capacitors), varactors, inductors, transmission lines, or transformers, suffer because the loss associated with the individual components. At the RF frequencies the more components used in the network, the aggregate of the individual component loss will worsen the total loss of the matching network.
D. Tunable Capacitors
High performance tunable capacitors are frequently used to tune variable impedance matching networks for RF communication applications. Typical capacitance values for these applications range from 1 pF to 5 pF with a tuning range of approximately 20% for Voltage Controlled Oscillators (VCOs) and 100% for antennas and filters. High quality factors 20 (Qs) over 50 are critical for these high performance tuning applications. A large voltage swing capability is highly desirable for implementing transmitter building blocks, where an RF voltage amplitude can reach 20 V peak to peak for an output power of 1 W.
Conventional tunable capacitors, commonly referred to as varactor diodes, are implemented using silicon PN junctions and Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) capacitor structures. These devices suffer from a limited qualify factor and tuning range, and exhibit a low voltage swing capability limited by the forward biasing of PN junctions or silicon dioxide breakdown, thus inadequate for high performance RF applications. The most commonly used varactor is a semiconductor diode varactor. However, semiconductor diode varactors suffer from low Q factors (especially at high frequencies), low power handling, and high intermodulation distortion. Common varactors used today are silicon and gallium arsenide based diodes.
Micromachined tunable capacitors have been proposed to improve various aspects of the device performance. Aluminum micromechanical tunable capacitors have been demonstrated by vertically moving a suspended plate towards the substrate with an electrostatic force. The device achieves a high Q due to low resistive loss and a moderate tuning range adequate for low phase noise RF VCOs.
Copper-based micromachined tunable capacitors, relying on laterally actuating a dielectric slab between two sets of copper electrodes, have been developed to obtain an improved quality factor but suffer from a small tuning range due to the dielectric layer warpage caused by the film strain gradient.
Silicon-based micromachined tunable capacitors have also been investigated, including vertically actuating a movable plate between two fixed electrodes and laterally varying the overlap area between two sets of comb drive fingers to achieve a large tuning range around 100% with a 5 V tuning voltage. However, due to the excessive silicon resistive loss, the devices exhibit low quality factors at high frequencies.
Recently, micromachined tunable capacitors operating in dielectric fluid have also been demonstrated to achieve an increased capacitance density with improved tuning performance. However, besides the low quality factor caused by the large silicon resistive loss, complex fluidic packaging is required not suitable for mobile applications.
Ferroelectric materials can also be used to create matching networks for fixed as well as variable impedance matching applications. The dielectric constant of the ferroelectric material can be varied by a DC voltage applied across the ferroelectric. Because the dielectric constant of the ferroelectric material changes over time due to several factors including temperature, humidity, aging of the material and hysteresis, it has to be well known before and calibrated during the fabrication process. The degree to which temperature, humidity, aging, hysteresis and the like cause the value of the dielectric constant to vary over time depends on the particular material. Ferroelectric materials are available which demonstrate minimal dielectric constant variations as a result of these factors. However, such materials have the undesirable properties of low phase change with voltage which is the main parameter of interest between the conductor line and the ground plane.
Recent advances in tunable ferroelectric materials have allowed for relatively low capacitance varactors that can operate at temperatures above those necessary for superconduction and at bias voltages less than those required for existing planar varactor structures, while maintaining high tunability and high Q factors. Even though these materials work in their paraelectric phase above the Curie temperature, they are conveniently called “ferroelectric” because they exhibit spontaneous polarization at temperatures below the Curie temperature. Tunable ferroelectric materials including barium-strontium titanate BaxSrl-xTiO3 CBST) or BST composites have been the subject of several patents. Dielectric materials including BST are disclosed by Sengupta, et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,312,790; U.S. Pat. No. 5,427,988; U.S. Pat. No. 5,486,491; U.S. Pat. No. 5,846,893; U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,434; U.S. Pat. No. 5,830,591; U.S. Pat. No. 5,766,697; U.S. Pat. No. 5,693,429; U.S. Pat. No. 6,074,971; U.S. Pat. No. 6,801,104 B2 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,433. These patents are hereby incorporated by reference. The permittivity (more commonly called dielectric constant) of these materials can be varied by varying the strength of an electric field to which the materials are subjected. These materials allow for thin-film ferroelectric composites of low overall dielectric constant that takes advantage of the high tunability and at the same time having high dielectric constants.
Embedded mobile phone antennas have significant performance issues such as dramatic drop in efficiencies when operating conditions change from free space (in a hands-free cradle) to in-situ (against head/hand), with typical efficiencies going from 70% to 25% for the high bands and from 50% dropping down to 10% for the low bands. Also antenna bandwidths often compromises band-edge performance, especially for antennas having aggressive size reduction, the laws of physics limits gain bandwidth product possible for a given antenna volume.
For the foregoing reasons, there is a need in the RF industry to develop a self-contained dynamic, tunable (variable) matching antenna network for improved efficiency in the “de-tuned” state of components, with minimal mismatch loss in multi-mode operation. To match dynamically multiple power levels, temperature changes, aging of components in RF circuits. A matching antenna network compliant to many different high efficiency power amplifier front end modules (FEMs), for multiple protocols in a multi-mode/multi band/multi-frequency devices.
An embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus, comprising an input port and a dynamic impedance matching network capable of determining a mismatch at the input port and dynamically changing the RF match by using at least one matching element that includes at least one voltage tunable dielectric capacitor. The matching network may be a “Pi”, a “T”, or “ladder” type network and the apparatus may further comprise at least one directional coupler capable of signal collection by sampling a portion of an incident signal, a reflected signal or both. In an embodiment of the present invention, the apparatus may also include a control and power control & logic unit (PC LU) to convert input analog signals into digital signals and sensing VSWR phase and magnitude and processing the digital signals using an algorithm to give it a voltage value and wherein the voltage values may be compared to values coming from the coupler and once compared and matched, the values may be passed to a Hi Voltage Application Specific Integrated Circuit (HV ASIC) to transfer and distribute compensatory voltages to the matching network elements.
In an embodiment of the present invention the sampling may be accomplished by at least one low impedance capacitor sampling element and the sampling element may be an interdigital capacitor or metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitor.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the aforementioned “ladder” type network may comprise four inductors in series and may include three grounded matching capacitors in parallel connected to the inductors.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the dynamic impedance matching network may be mounted onto a low-cost thermally conductive dielectric substrate with components surface mounted on one side, then over-molded as a Multi-Chip-Module (MCM), which may be itself surface mountable on to a printed wiring board of an RF devise. Further, the dynamic impedance matching network system may be positioned between a Power Amplifier (P A) unit and a frequency filter unit in the apparatus and the apparatus may be a mobile phone and further comprises an external digital signal processor to convert input analog signals into digital signals and sensing VSWR phase and magnitude and processing the digital signals using an algorithm to give it a voltage value and wherein the voltage values are compared to values coming from the coupler and once compared and matched, compensatory voltages are transferred and distributed to the matching network elements.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the apparatus may be a mobile phone and the dynamic impedance matching network system may be positioned between a frequency filter unit and a switch unit in the mobile phone or the dynamic impedance matching network may be a single stand-alone component that may be placed in the transmit chain of a mobile phone radio. Also, the apparatus may be a mobile phone and the dynamic impedance matching network may be self-contained thereby requiring only a fixed DC bias 3V from the mobile phone. This self-contained dynamic impedance matching network system enables impedance matching and therefore operation in a GSM, EDGE, CDMA or WCDMA or multi-mode mobile phone, and at least capable of a single band operation that includes 800, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz bands and the 2.1 GHz band.
In another embodiment of the present invention is provided a method of matching the impedance of an RF signal received by an input port of a device by using a dynamic impedance matching network capable of determining a mismatch at the input port and dynamically changing the RF match by using at least one matching element that includes at least one voltage tunable dielectric capacitor.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention is provided an auto-adjusting matching circuit, comprising a first and second coupler to sample an incoming signal and an outgoing signal, a matching network to receive the incoming signal and including a plurality of matching network elements comprising voltage tunable dielectric capacitors, wherein the matching network is capable of automatically adjusting an impedance of the incoming signal, and a power control & logic unit to produce a voltage to output ports from a High Voltage Application Specific Integrated Circuit to the plurality of matching network elements.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Additionally, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the drawing in which the reference number first appears.
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present invention.
An impedance matching network or circuit, may be a combination of reactive elements connected between a circuit and at least one load that transform the load impedance into another impedance value to achieve improved performance such as maximum power transfer, reduced reflections, or optimum load performance. An impedance matching network may be made up of a combination of lumped elements, (resistors, capacitors, and inductors), or distributed elements (transmission lines of varying characteristic impedance and length). Similarly, an impedance matching network, transforms the circuit impedance from one value to another. A varactor of one embodiment of the present invention that may be used in an impedance matching network is illustrated in
It may be determined, based on required source and load reflection coefficients, the ideal matching network required for a particular circuit. Depending on the center frequency, the proper individual values of the lumped elements or lengths of the transmission lines will be applied. In general, there are several different matching circuits available. Based on insertion loss, simplicity, and reproducibility of each matching element, the best selection can be made. Some of the possible networks typically used are described but not limited to
Turning now to
Throughout the description of the present invention, BST may or has been used as a tunable dielectric material that may be used in a tunable dielectric capacitor of the present invention. However, the assignee of the present invention, Paratek Microwave, Inc. has developed and continues to develop tunable dielectric materials that may be utilized in embodiments of the present invention and thus the present invention is not limited to using BST material. This family of tunable dielectric materials may be referred to as Parascan®.
The term Parascan® as used herein is a trademarked term indicating a tunable dielectric material developed by the assignee of the present invention. Parascan® tunable dielectric materials have been described in several patents. Barium strontium titanate (BaTiO3-SrTiO3), also referred to as BSTO, is used for its high dielectric constant (200-6,000) and large change in dielectric constant with applied voltage (25-75 percent with a field of 2 Volts/micron). Tunable dielectric materials including barium strontium titanate are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,312,790 to Sengupta, et al. entitled “Ceramic Ferroelectric Material”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,427,988 by Sengupta, et al. entitled “Ceramic Ferroelectric Composite Material-BSTO-MgO”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,486,491 to Sengupta, et al. entitled “Ceramic Ferroelectric Composite Material-BSTO-ZrO2”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,434 by Sengupta, et al. entitled “Ceramic Ferroelectric Composite Material-BSTO-Magnesium Based Compound”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,830,591 by Sengupta, et al. entitled “Multilayered Ferroelectric Composite Waveguides”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,846,893 by Sengupta, et al. entitled “Thin Film Ferroelectric Composites and Method of Making”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,766,697 by Sengupta, et al. entitled “Method of Making Thin Film Composites”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,693,429 by Sengupta, et al. entitled “Electronically Graded Multilayer Ferroelectric Composites”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,433 by Sengupta entitled “Ceramic Ferroelectric Composite Material BSTO-ZnO”; U.S. Pat. No. 6,074,971 by Chiu et al. entitled “Ceramic Ferroelectric Composite Materials with Enhanced Electronic Properties BSTO Mg Based Compound-Rare Earth Oxide”. These patents are incorporated herein by reference. The materials shown in these patents, especially BSTO-MgO composites, show low dielectric loss and high tunability. Tunability is defined as the fractional change in the dielectric constant with applied voltage.
Barium strontium titanate of the formula BaxSrl-xTiO3 is a preferred electronically tunable dielectric material due to its favorable tuning characteristics, low Curie temperatures and low microwave loss properties. In the formula BaxSrl-xTiO3, x can be any value from 0 to 1, preferably from about 0.15 to about 0.6. More preferably, x is from 0.3 to 0.6.
Other electronically tunable dielectric materials may be used partially or entirely in place of barium strontium titanate. An example is BaxCal-xTiO3, where x is in a range from about 0.2 to about 0.8, preferably from about 0.4 to about 0.6. Additional electronically tunable ferroelectrics include PbxZrl-xTiO3 (PZT) where x ranges from about 0.0 to about 1.0, PbxZrlxSrTiO3 where x ranges from about 0.05 to about 0.4, KTaxNbl-xO3 where x ranges from about 0.0 to about 1.0, lead lanthanum zirconium titanate (PLZT), PbTiO3, BaCaZrTiO3, NaNO3, KNbO3, LiNbO3, LiTaO3, PbNb2O6, PbTa2O6, KSr(NbO3) and NaBa2(NbO3)5 KH2PO4, and mixtures and compositions thereof. Also, these materials can be combined with low loss dielectric materials, such as magnesium oxide (MgO), aluminum oxide (AI2O3), and zirconium oxide (ZrO2), and/or with additional doping elements, such as manganese (MN), iron (Fe), and tungsten (W), or with other alkali earth metal oxides (Le. calcium oxide, etc.), transition metal oxides, silicates, niobates, tantalates, aluminates, zirconnates, and titanates to further reduce the dielectric loss.
In addition, the following U.S. patent applications, assigned to the assignee of this application, disclose additional examples of tunable dielectric materials: U.S. application Ser. No. 09/594,837 filed Jun. 15, 2000, entitled “Electronically Tunable Ceramic Materials” Including Tunable Dielectric and Metal Silicate Phases”; U.S. application Ser. No. 09/768,690 filed Jan. 24, 2001, entitled “Electronically Tunable, Low-Loss Ceramic Materials Including a Tunable Dielectric Phase and Multiple Metal Oxide Phases”; U.S. application Ser. No. 09/882,605 filed Jun. 15, 2001, entitled “Electronically Tunable Dielectric Composite Thick Films And Methods Of Making Same”; U.S. application Ser. No. 09/834,327 filed Apr. 13, 2001, entitled “Strain-Relieved Tunable Dielectric Thin Films”; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/295,046 filed Jun. 1, 2001 entitled “Tunable Dielectric Compositions Including Low Loss Glass Frits”. These patent applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The tunable dielectric materials can also be combined with one or more nontunable dielectric materials. The non-tunable phase(s) may include MgO, MgAl2O4, MgTiO3, Mg2SiO4, CaSiO3, MgSrZrTiO6, CaTiO3, Al2O3, SiO2 and/or other metal silicates such as BaSiO3 and SrSiO3. The non-tunable dielectric phases may be any combination of the above, e.g., MgO combined with MgTiO3, MgO combined with MgSrZrTiO6, MgO combined with Mg2SiO4, MgO combined with Mg2SiO4, Mg2SiO4 combined with CaTiO3 and the like.
Additional minor additives in amounts of from about 0.1 to about 5 weight percent can be added to the composites to additionally improve the electronic properties of the films. These minor additives include oxides such as zirconnates, tannates, rare earths, niobates and tantalates. For example, the minor additives may include CaZrO3, BaZrO3, SrZrO3, BaSnO3, CaSnO3, MgSnO3, Bi2O3/2SnO2, Nd2O3, Pr7O11, Yb2O3, HO2O3, La2O3, MgNb2O6, SrNb2O6, BaNb2O6, MgTa2O6, BaTa2O6 and Ta2O3.
Thick films of tunable dielectric composites may comprise Bal-xSrxTiO3, where x is from 0.3 to 0.7 in combination with at least one non-tunable dielectric phase selected from MgO, MgTiO3, MgZrO3, MgSrZrTiO6, Mg2SiO4, CaSiO3, MgAl2O4, CaTiO3, Al203, SiO2, BaSiO3 and SrSiO3. These compositions can be BSTO and one of these components, or two or more of these components in quantities from 0.25 weight percent to 80 weight percent with BSTO weight ratios of 99.75 weight percent to 20 weight percent.
The electronically tunable materials may also include at least one metal silicate phase. The metal silicates may include metals from Group 2A of the Periodic Table, i.e., Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba and Ra, preferably Mg, Ca, Sr and Ba. Preferred metal silicates include Mg2SiO4, CaSiO3, BaSiO3 and SrSiO3. In addition to Group 2A metals, the present metal silicates may include metals from Group 1A, i.e., Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs and Fr, preferably Li, Na and K. For example, such metal silicates may include sodium silicates such as Na2SiO3 and NaSiO3-5H2O, and lithium-containing silicates such as LiAISiO4, Li2SiO3 and Li4SiO4. Metals from Groups 3A, 4A and some transition metals of the Periodic Table may also be suitable constituents of the metal silicate phase. Additional metal silicates may include Al2Si2O7, ZrSiO4, KaISi308, NaAISi3O8, CaAl2Si2O8, CaMgSi2O6, BaTiSi3O9 and Zn2SiO4. The above tunable materials can be tuned at room temperature by controlling an electric field that is applied across the materials.
In addition to the electronically tunable dielectric phase, the electronically tunable materials can include at least two additional metal oxide phases. The additional metal oxides may include metals from Group 2A of the Periodic Table, i.e., Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Be and Ra, preferably Mg, Ca, Sr and Ba. The additional metal oxides may also include metals from Group 1A, i.e., Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs and Fr, preferably Li, Na and K. Metals from other Groups of the Periodic Table may also be suitable constituents of the metal oxide phases. For example, refractory metals such as Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, Ta and W may be used. Furthermore, metals such as AI, Si, Sn, Pb and Bi may be used. In addition, the metal oxide phases may comprise rare earth metals such as Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd and the like.
The additional metal oxides may include, for example, zirconnates, silicates, titanates, aluminates, stannates, niobates, tantalates and rare earth oxides. Preferred additional metal oxides include Mg2SiO4, MgO, CaTiO3, MgZrSrTiO6, MgTiO3, MgAl2O4, WO3, SnTiO4, ZrTiO4, CaSiO3, CaSnO3, CaWO4, CaZrO3, MgTa2O6, MgZrO3, MnO2, PbO, Bi2O3 and La2O3. Particularly preferred additional metal oxides include Mg2SiO4, MgO, CaTiO3, MgZrSrTiO6, MgTiO3, MgAl2O4, MgTa2O6 and MgZrO3.
The additional metal oxide phases are typically present in total amounts of from about 1 to about 80 weight percent of the material, preferably from about 3 to about 65 weight percent, and more preferably from about 5 to about 60 weight percent. In one preferred embodiment, the additional metal oxides comprise from about 10 to about 50 total weight percent of the material. The individual amount of each additional metal oxide may be adjusted to provide the desired properties. Where two additional metal oxides are used, their weight ratios may vary, for example, from about 1:100 to about 100:1, typically from about 1:10 to about 10:1 or from about 1:5 to about 5:1. Although metal oxides in total amounts of from 1 to 80 weight percent are typically used, smaller additive amounts of from 0.01 to 1 weight percent may be used for some applications.
The additional metal oxide phases can include at least two Mg-containing compounds. In addition to the multiple Mg-containing compounds, the material may optionally include Mg-free compounds, for example, oxides of metals selected from Si, Ca, Zr, Ti, Al and/or rare earths. The matching network elements 10a, 10c may be connected to matching network element 10b by means of line 106 and line 107. These lumped components in the matching network 10 are ideally suited for integrated impedance matching at low GHz frequencies. This type of matching network 10 may be further preferred because it may comprises passive components such as inductors and metal-BST or dielectric-metal capacitors with high quality factors not generating noise or loss as with resistive networks. It is understood that the present invention is not limited to the aforementioned passive components.
The signal collecting means used in
The purpose of the coupler 102 may be to sample the incoming (mismatched) signals in one direction by means of line 110 and on reverse direction in line 109. In order to maximize coupling efficiency and to increase coupling field, two coupling ports may be used 109 and 110. There is transfer the RF energy from signal 104 to line 106 to the coupling means of ports 110 and 109 into the control and power control & logic unit (PC LU) 116 which converts the input analog signals 104 into digital signals, senses VSWR phase and magnitude, processes the digital signals using an algorithm and gives it a voltage value. These values may be compared to values coming from coupler 101 through coupling ports 105 and 108 into the logic and power control & logic unit (PC LU) 116. Once compared and matched, these values may later be fed through a connection means 118 into a Hi Voltage Application Specific Integrated Circuit (HV ASIC) 117 by which further transfers and distributes the compensatory voltages to the matching network elements 10a, 10b and 10c.
In an antenna, the impedance is the ratio of the applied or induced voltage to the current flowing into or out of the antenna input. More generally, it is defined as the ratio of the electric field to the magnetic field. The purpose of using variable matching capacitors 313 as matching network elements 10a, 10b and 10c is to compensate the mismatched impedances in the RF circuit by means of dynamically increasing or decreasing the voltage across said BST capacitors. The capacitance may be used to “tune” the RF circuit with an externally applied variable voltage 34. The algorithms in the power control & logic unit (PCLU) 116 may be based on dynamic equations (independent equations) for the purpose of control. Voltage compensation operations applied to the matching network elements 10a, 10b, and 10c, may be employed in a closed loop control system. This means will counteract dynamic lags or to modify the impedance between measured voltage of coupler 101 and coupler 102. Variables in the power control & logic unit (PCLU) 116 produces a prompt stable response voltage to output ports 111, 112, 113 from the HV ASIC 117. The compensation action may be conditioned by speed of the power control & logic unit (PCLU) 116 and the frequency of the incoming signals 104 and 103. In an embodiment of the present invention the variable capacitance of matching network elements 10a, 10b and 10c may allow for a simple low loss means to dynamically compensate any RF circuit in an autonomous system loop.
According to another embodiment of the present invention as illustrated in
The signal sampler used in
As an alternative means, interdigital capacitors may be used as sampling capacitors 204 and 203. These are a planar version of the multilayer capacitor. These capacitors have medium Q, are accurate, and are typically less than 1 pF and may be tuned by cutting off fingers. Because interdigital capacitors have a distributed transmission line structure, they will show multiple resonances as frequency increases. The first resonance occurs when the structure is a quarter wavelength. The Q of this structure is limited by the current crowding at the thin edges of the fingers.
As a further alternative means, metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitor may be used as sampling capacitors 204 and 203. A MIM capacitor, which has a thin insulator layer between two metal electrodes and generally this capacitor is fabricated in semiconductor process, and this insulator layer provides high capacitance. Two extreme behaviors of a capacitor are that it will act as an open circuit to low frequencies or DC (zero frequency), and as a short frequency at a sufficiently high frequency (how high is determined by the capacitor value).
The signal sampling means used in
The sampling process is the act of turning a time continuous signal into a signal that is time discrete or time-discontinuous. In order to maintain frequency components of interest in the time-discontinuous signal, the Nyquist sampling criterion is satisfied. This criterion states that the rate of sampling of the time-continuous signal has to be at least twice as great as the frequency of the signal component with the highest frequency which is of interest in the time-continuous signal. A control loop can uniform supply the sampling of a continuous signal at a constant sampling frequency.
According to an embodiment of the present invention,
The purpose of the coupler 102 is to sample the incoming (mismatched) signals in one direction by means of line 110 and on reverse direction in line 109. In order to maximize coupling efficiency and to increase coupling field, two coupling ports 109 and 110 are used. There is a transfer of RF energy from signal 104 to line 106 to the coupling means of ports 110 and 109 into the control and power control & logic unit (PC LU) 116 which converts the input analog signals 104 into digital signals, senses VSWR phase and magnitude, processes the digital signals using an algorithm and gives it a voltage value. These values are compared to values coming from coupler 101 though coupling ports 105 and 108 into the logic and power control & 5 logic unit (PC LU) 116. Once compared and matched, these values are later fed through a connection means 118 into a Hi Voltage Application Specific Integrated Circuit (HV ASIC) 117 by which further transfers and distributes the compensatory voltages to the matching network elements 10a, 10b and 10c.
According to a fourth advantageous embodiment,
In an embodiment of the present invention, the dynamic impedance matching network systems 100, 200, 300 and 400, may be single stand-alone components (modules), that may be placed in the transmit chain of mobile phone radio
The self contained dynamic impedance matching network systems of embodiments of the present invention may be mounted onto a low-cost thermally conductive dielectric substrate such as Alumina (AI203) with the said components surface mounted on one side, then over-molded as a Multi-Chip-Module (MCM) of a typical size of 10-15 mm2 size, which is itself surface mountable on to the printed wiring board (PWB) of the RF devise. It is understood that the present invention is not limited to any particular dielectric substrates. The dynamic impedance matching network systems may further comprise at least one DC input port 115, at least one RF output port 109 and at least one RF input port 125 (multiple ports may be used for each band). Generally, GaAs MESFET processes are utilized; on semi-insulating substrate and thick metallization layers, although the present invention is not limited in this respect. This process allows passive matching components such as spiral inductors and variable matching capacitors 313 and metal-insulator-metal (MIM) 305,306 and 307 capacitors with high quality factors. Fully integrated matching network elements 10a, 10b and 10c using spiral inductors and variable matching capacitors 313 may be done on-chip in order to improve the reproducibility and save board space, although it is not required to be. These lumped passive components may be ideally suited for integrated impedance matching at low GHz frequencies.
The self-contained dynamic impedance matching network systems 100, 200, 300 and 400, may be advantageously used between any two units or components in any system with a varying impedance match issue. In an embodiment of
Change in optimum impedance is required when operating under different protocols for multi-mode phones. Using this type of self-contained dynamic impedance matching network system there are no specific signals needed from the baseband or receiver, making it possible to be universal in nature, working in any RF devise regardless of protocol. This same self-contained dynamic impedance matching network system works equally well in a GSM, EDGE, CDMA or WCDMA phone, or even multi-mode phone. The dynamic impedance matching network system will be at least capable of a single band operation, this includes but it is not limited to; 800, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz bands and the 2.1 GHz band.
The PA's in the 410 unit may be made of Gallium Arsenide (GaAs)/Heterojunction Bipolar Transistor (HBT), although the present invention is not limited in this respect. In a multiple band module such as in
When positioned at 407 in
The TABLE of
The experiments showed a significant improvement by maximizing power transfer and reducing mismatch losses caused by component impedance variations. Impedance variations of all components in the transmitter chain caused by temperature variations, aging or radiation hot spots caused by VSWR problems within the phone, resulting in radiation leaking around the display and into the user's body or hand. The experiments also showed that the closer the dynamic impedance matching network system 100 was to the antenna 440, the larger the effect and the greater the ability to control the impedance match. Furthermore, a significant decrease in specific absorption rate (SAR) was seen, improving the transmitter chain match reduced much of the radiation that was measured during SAR testing.
While the present invention has been described in terms of what are at present believed to be its preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that various modifications to the disclose embodiments can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/952,395, entitled TUNABLE MICROWAVE DEVICES WITH AUTO-ADJUSTING MATCHING CIRCUIT, filed Nov. 23, 2010, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/245,898, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,154, entitled TUNABLE MICROWAVE DEVICES WITH AUTO-ADJUSTING MATCHING CIRCUIT, filed Oct. 8, 2005, which is a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 10/938,898 entitled “TUNABLE MICROWAVE DEVICES WITH AUTO-ADJUSTING MATCHING CIRCUIT”, filed Sep. 10, 2004, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/455,901, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,864,757, entitled “TUNABLE MICROWAVE DEVICES WITH AUTO-ADJUSTING MATCHING CIRCUIT”, filed Jun. 6, 2003, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/909,187, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,590,468, entitled “TUNABLE MICROWAVE DEVICES WITH AUTO-ADJUSTING MATCHING CIRCUIT”, filed Jul. 19, 2001, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 60/219,500, filed Jul. 20, 2000. All sections of application Ser. No. 12/952,395, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,154 are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2745067 | True | May 1956 | A |
3117279 | Ludvigson | Jan 1964 | A |
3160832 | Beitman | Dec 1964 | A |
3390337 | Beitman | Jun 1968 | A |
3443231 | Roza | May 1969 | A |
3509500 | McNair | Apr 1970 | A |
3571716 | Hill | Mar 1971 | A |
3590385 | Sabo | Jun 1971 | A |
3601717 | Kuecken | Aug 1971 | A |
3742279 | Kupsky | Jun 1973 | A |
3794941 | Templin | Feb 1974 | A |
3919644 | Smolka | Nov 1975 | A |
3990024 | Hou | Nov 1976 | A |
3995237 | Brunner | Nov 1976 | A |
4186359 | Kaegebein | Jan 1980 | A |
4201960 | Skutta | May 1980 | A |
4227256 | O'Keefe | Oct 1980 | A |
4383441 | Willis | May 1983 | A |
4476578 | Gaudin et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4493112 | Bruene | Jan 1985 | A |
4777490 | Sharma | Oct 1988 | A |
4799066 | Deacon | Jan 1989 | A |
4965607 | Wilkins | Oct 1990 | A |
4980656 | Duffalo | Dec 1990 | A |
5032805 | Elmer | Jul 1991 | A |
5136478 | Bruder | Aug 1992 | A |
5142255 | Chang | Aug 1992 | A |
5177670 | Shinohara | Jan 1993 | A |
5195045 | Keane | Mar 1993 | A |
5200826 | Seong | Apr 1993 | A |
5212463 | Babbitt | May 1993 | A |
5243358 | Sanford | Sep 1993 | A |
5258728 | Taniyoshi | Nov 1993 | A |
5276912 | Siwiak | Jan 1994 | A |
5301358 | Gaskill | Apr 1994 | A |
5307033 | Koscica | Apr 1994 | A |
5310358 | Johnson | May 1994 | A |
5312790 | Sengupta | May 1994 | A |
5334958 | Babbitt | Aug 1994 | A |
5371473 | Trinh | Dec 1994 | A |
5409889 | Das | Apr 1995 | A |
5427988 | Sengupta | Jun 1995 | A |
5430417 | Martin | Jul 1995 | A |
5446447 | Carney | Aug 1995 | A |
5448252 | Ali | Sep 1995 | A |
5451567 | Das | Sep 1995 | A |
5451914 | Stengel | Sep 1995 | A |
5457394 | McEwan | Oct 1995 | A |
5472935 | Yandrofski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479139 | Koscica et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486491 | Sengupta et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5496795 | Das | Mar 1996 | A |
5502372 | Quan | Mar 1996 | A |
5524281 | Bradley et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5548837 | Hess et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5561407 | Koscica et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5564086 | Cygan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5589844 | Belcher et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593495 | Masuda et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5635433 | Sengupta | Jun 1997 | A |
5635434 | Sengupta | Jun 1997 | A |
5640042 | Koscica | Jun 1997 | A |
5679624 | Das | Oct 1997 | A |
5689219 | Piirainen | Nov 1997 | A |
5693429 | Sengupta | Dec 1997 | A |
5694134 | Barnes | Dec 1997 | A |
5699071 | Urakami | Dec 1997 | A |
5721194 | Yandrofski | Feb 1998 | A |
5766697 | Sengupta et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777581 | Lilly | Jul 1998 | A |
5778308 | Sroka | Jul 1998 | A |
5786727 | Sigmon | Jul 1998 | A |
5812572 | King | Sep 1998 | A |
5812943 | Suzuki | Sep 1998 | A |
5830591 | Sengupta | Nov 1998 | A |
5846893 | Sengupta | Dec 1998 | A |
5874926 | Tsuru et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880635 | Satoh | Mar 1999 | A |
5886867 | Chivukula | Mar 1999 | A |
5892482 | Coleman | Apr 1999 | A |
5929717 | Richardson | Jul 1999 | A |
5963871 | Zhinong | Oct 1999 | A |
5969582 | Boesch | Oct 1999 | A |
5982099 | Barnes et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990766 | Zhang | Nov 1999 | A |
6009124 | Smith | Dec 1999 | A |
6020787 | Kim | Feb 2000 | A |
6020795 | Kim | Feb 2000 | A |
6029075 | Das | Feb 2000 | A |
6045932 | Jia | Apr 2000 | A |
6061025 | Jackson | May 2000 | A |
6074971 | Chiu | Jun 2000 | A |
6096127 | Dimos | Aug 2000 | A |
6100733 | Dortu | Aug 2000 | A |
6101102 | Brand | Aug 2000 | A |
6115585 | Matero | Sep 2000 | A |
6133883 | Munson | Oct 2000 | A |
6172385 | Duncombe | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6215644 | Dhuler | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242989 | Barber | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6281748 | Klomsdorf et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281847 | Lee | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309895 | Jaing | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343208 | Ying | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6377142 | Chiu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377217 | Zhu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377440 | Zhu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384785 | Kamogawa | May 2002 | B1 |
6404614 | Zhu | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408190 | Ying | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414562 | Bouisse | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415562 | Donaghue | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6452776 | Chakravorty | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461930 | Akram | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6466774 | Okabe | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6492883 | Liang | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6514895 | Chiu | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525630 | Zhu | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531936 | Chiu | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535076 | Partridge | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535722 | Rosen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538603 | Chen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556102 | Sengupta | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556814 | Klomsdorf | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570462 | Edmonson | May 2003 | B2 |
6590468 | du Toit | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6590541 | Schultze | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597265 | Liang | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6608603 | Alexopoulos | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6624786 | Boyle | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6640085 | Chatzipetros | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657595 | Alameh | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661638 | Terry | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670256 | Yang | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6710651 | Forrester | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6724611 | Mosley | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724890 | Bareis | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737179 | Sengupta | May 2004 | B2 |
6759918 | Du Toit | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6765540 | Toncich | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768472 | Alexopoulos | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774077 | Sengupta | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795712 | Vakilian | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6825818 | Toncich | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839028 | Lee | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845126 | Dent | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859104 | Toncich | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862432 | Kim | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6864757 | Du Toit | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6868260 | Jagielski | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875655 | Lin | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888714 | Shaw | May 2005 | B2 |
6905989 | Ellis | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6907234 | Karr | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920315 | Wilcox et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6922330 | Nielsen | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6943078 | Zheng | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6946847 | Nishimori | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949442 | Barth | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961368 | Dent | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964296 | Memory | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965837 | Vintola | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6993297 | Smith | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999297 | Klee | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7009455 | Toncich | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7071776 | Forrester | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7106715 | Kelton | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7107033 | Du Toit | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113614 | Rhoads | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7151411 | Martin | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7176634 | Kitamura | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7176845 | Fabrega-Sanchez | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180467 | Fabrega-Sanchez | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7221327 | Toncich | May 2007 | B2 |
7298329 | Diament | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7312118 | Kiyotoshi | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7332980 | Zhu | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7332981 | Matsuno | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339527 | Sager | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7369828 | Shamsaifar | May 2008 | B2 |
7426373 | Clingman | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427949 | Channabasappa et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7453405 | Nishikido et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468638 | Tsai | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7469129 | Blaker et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7531011 | Yamasaki | May 2009 | B2 |
7535080 | Zeng et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7535312 | McKinzie | May 2009 | B2 |
7539527 | Jang | May 2009 | B2 |
7557507 | Wu | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7596357 | Nakamata | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7633355 | Matsuo | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7655530 | Hosking | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7667663 | Hsiao et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7705692 | Fukamachi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711337 | Mckinzie | May 2010 | B2 |
7714676 | McKinzie | May 2010 | B2 |
7714678 | du Toit | May 2010 | B2 |
7728693 | du Toit | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7768400 | Lawrence | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786819 | Ella | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7795990 | du Toit | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7852170 | McKinzie | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7865154 | Mendolia | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7907094 | Kakitsu | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917104 | Manssen | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7949309 | Rofougaran | May 2011 | B2 |
7969257 | du Toit | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7991363 | Greene | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8008982 | McKinzie | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8072285 | Spears | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8112043 | Knudsen | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8170510 | Knudsen et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190109 | Ali et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8204446 | Scheer | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8217732 | McKinzie | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8299867 | Mckinzie | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8320850 | Khlat | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8442457 | Harel et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
20020008672 | Gothard | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020030566 | Bozler | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020109642 | Gee et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118075 | Ohwada | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020145483 | Bouisse | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167963 | Joa-Ng | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187780 | Souissi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191703 | Ling | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193088 | Jung | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030060227 | Sekine | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071300 | Yashima | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030114124 | Higuchi | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030142022 | Ollikainen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030193997 | Dent | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199286 | D du Toit | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210206 | Phillips | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030232607 | Le Bars | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040009754 | Smith | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040090372 | Nallo | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100341 | Luetzelschwab | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127178 | Kuffner | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137950 | Bolin | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040202399 | Kochergin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040257293 | Friedrich | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007291 | Fabrega-Sanchez | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050032488 | Pehlke | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032541 | Wang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042994 | Otaka | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059362 | Kalajo | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082636 | Yashima | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085204 | Poilasne | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093624 | Forrester et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130608 | Forse | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130699 | Kim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050208960 | Hassan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215204 | Wallace | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050264455 | Talvitie | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282503 | Onno | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003537 | Sinha | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009165 | Alles | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060099915 | Laroia et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060160501 | Mendolia | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060183433 | Mori et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183442 | Chang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205368 | Bustamante | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060281423 | Caimi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070013483 | Stewart | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070035458 | Ohba | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042725 | Poilasne | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042734 | Ryu | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070063788 | Zhu | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080888 | Mohamadi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082611 | Terranova et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085609 | Itkin | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070111681 | Alberth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142014 | Wilcox | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149146 | Hwang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070182636 | Carlson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070184825 | Lim | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194859 | Brobston | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197180 | McKinzie | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200766 | McKinzie | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070285326 | McKinzie | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293176 | Yu | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007478 | Jung | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018541 | Pang | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080055016 | Morris | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080081670 | Rofougaran | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080106350 | McKinzie | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122553 | McKinzie | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122723 | Rofougaran | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129612 | Wang | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158076 | Walley | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080261544 | Blin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274706 | Blin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080280570 | Blin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300027 | Dou | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080305749 | Ben-Bassat | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002077 | Rohani et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027286 | Ohishi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090082017 | Chang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090109880 | Kim et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121963 | Greene | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149136 | Rofougaran | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180403 | Tudosoiu | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090184879 | Derneryd | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090215446 | Hapsari et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090231220 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253385 | Dent et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264065 | Song | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278685 | Potyrailo | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090323582 | Proctor | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100041348 | Wilcox | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100053009 | Rofougaran | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073103 | Spears | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085260 | Mckinzie | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105425 | Asokan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100156552 | McKinzie | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164640 | Mckinzie | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100164641 | Mckinzie | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100232474 | Rofougaran | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100285836 | Horihata | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302106 | Knudsen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304688 | Knudsen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110012790 | Badaruzzaman | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110014879 | Alberth et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110014886 | Manssen | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110043298 | McKinzie | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110053524 | Manssen | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063042 | Mendolia | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110086600 | Muhammad | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110086630 | Manssen | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110102290 | Milosavljevic | May 2011 | A1 |
20110105023 | Scheer et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121079 | Lawrence et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133994 | Korva | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110183628 | Baker | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110183633 | Ohba | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110227666 | Manssen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110250852 | Greene | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254637 | Manssen | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254638 | Manssen | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110256857 | Chen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110281532 | Shin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299438 | Mikhemar | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120075159 | Chang | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120094708 | Park | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120100802 | Mohebbi | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120154975 | Oakes | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120214421 | Hoirup | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120243579 | Premakanthan et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120295554 | Greene | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19614655 | Oct 1997 | DE |
102008050743 | Apr 2010 | DE |
0685936 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0909024 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1079296 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1137192 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1298810 | Apr 2006 | EP |
2328233 | Jun 2011 | EP |
03276901 | Mar 1990 | JP |
9321526 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10209722 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2000124066 | Apr 2000 | JP |
100645526 | Nov 2006 | KR |
10-0740177 | Jul 2007 | KR |
0171846 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2006031170 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2008030165 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2009064968 | May 2009 | WO |
2009155966 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2011044592 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011084716 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011133657 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011028453 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012085932 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bezooijen, A. et al., “A GSM/EDGE/WCDMA Adaptive Series—LC Matching Network Using RF-MEMS Switches”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, No. 10, Oct. 2008, 2259-2268. |
Du Toit, , “Tunable Microwave Devices With Auto Adjusting Matching Circuit”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,617, filed Nov. 22, 2011. |
Du Toit, , “Tunable Microwave Devices With Auto-Adjusting Matching Circuit”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,649, filed Nov. 22, 2011. |
Eiji, N. , “High-Frequency Circuit and Its Manufacture”, Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 1998, No. 13, Nov. 30, 1998 & JP 10 209722 A (Seiko Epson Corp), Aug. 7, 1998. |
Greene, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,463, filed May 16, 2011. |
Greene, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,589, filed May 16, 2011. |
Hoirup, , “Method and Apparatus for Radio Antenna Frequency Tuning”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,177, filed Feb. 18, 2011. |
Huang, Libo et al., “Theoretical and experimental investigation of adaptive antenna impedance matching for multiband mobile phone applications”, IEEE, Sep. 7, 2005, 13-17. |
Hyun, S. , “Effects of strain on the dielectric properties of tunable dielectric SrTi03 thin films”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 2, Jul. 9, 2001. |
Ida, I. et al., “An Adaptive Impedence Matching System and Its Application to Mobile Antennas”, TENCON 2004, IEEE Region 10 Conference, See Abstract ad p. 544, Nov. 21-24, 2004, 543-547. |
Katsuya, K. , “Hybrid Integrated Circuit Device”, Patent Abstracts of Japan, Publication No. 03-276901, Date of publication of application: Sep. 12, 1991. |
Manssen, , “Method and Apparatus for Managing Interference in a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/326,206, filed Apr. 20, 2010. |
Manssen, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning Antennas in a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/941,972, filed Nov. 8, 2010. |
Manssen, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning Antennas in a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/005,122, filed Jan. 12, 2011. |
McKinzie, , “Adaptive Impedance Matching Module (AIMM) Control Architectures”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/293,544, filed Nov. 10, 2011. |
McKinzie, , “Adaptive Impedance Matching Module (AIMM) Control Architectures”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/293,550, filed Nov. 10, 2011. |
McKinzie, , “Method and Apparatus for Adaptive Impedance Matching”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/217,748, filed Aug. 25, 2011. |
Mendolia, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/035,417, filed Feb. 25, 2011. |
Paratek Microwave, Inc., , “Method and Appartus for Tuning Antennas in a Communication Device”, International Application No. PCT/US11/59620; Filed Nov. 7, 2011. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, International Application No. PCT/US2010/046241, Mar. 2, 2011. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, International Application No. PCT/US2010/056413, Jul. 27, 2011. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Nov. 16, 2011, International Application No. PCT/US/2011/038543. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, PCT Application No. PCT/US08/005085, Jul. 2, 2008. |
Pervez, N.K. , “High Tunability barium strontium titanate thin films for RF circuit applications”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, No. 19, Nov. 8, 2004. |
Petit, Laurent , “MEMS-Switched Parasitic-Antenna Array for Radiation Pattern Diversity”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, No. 9, Sep. 2009, 2624-2631. |
Qiao, et al., “Antenna Impedance Mismatch Measurement and Correction for Adaptive COMA Transceivers”, IEEE, Jan. 2005. |
Qiao, et al., “Measurement of Antenna Load Impedance for Power Amplifiers”, The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, Sep. 13, 2004. |
Spears, , “Methods for Tuning an Adaptive Impedance Matching Network With a Look-Up Table”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,951, filed Nov. 16, 2011. |
Stemmer, Susanne , “Low-loss tunable capacitors fabricated directly on gold bottom electrodes”, Applied Physics Letters 88, 112905, Mar. 15, 2006. |
Taylor, T.R. , “Impact of thermal strain on the dielectric constant of sputtered barium strontium titanate thin films”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, No. 11, Mar. 18, 2002. |
Tombak, Ali , “Tunable Barium Strontium Titanate Thin Film Capacitors for RF and Microwave Applications”, IEEE Microwave and Wireles Components Letters, vol. 12, Jan. 2002. |
Xu, Hongtao , “Tunable Microwave Integrated Circuits using BST Thin Film Capacitors with Device”, Integrated Ferroelectrics, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering, University of California, Apr. 2005. |
Zuo, S. , “Eigenmode Decoupling for Mimo Loop-Antenna Based on 180 Coupler”, Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters, vol. 26, Aug. 2011, 11-20. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130169493 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60219500 | Jul 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09909187 | Jul 2001 | US |
Child | 10455901 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12952395 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 13745624 | US | |
Parent | 11245898 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 12952395 | US | |
Parent | 10455901 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 10938898 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10938898 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11245898 | US |